Dick Cheney, Meet Sabrina deSouza
Thursday, November 05, 2009 at 1:30 pm
Sabrina deSouza is one of the 23 U.S. officials convicted in Italy for the illegal CIA rendition of an Egyptian terrorist suspect named Abu Omar. She concedes the United States “broke the law” in ordering and carrying out the rendition, and says, “we are paying for the mistakes right now, whoever authorized and approved this.”
Wow, who could that be? Remember this:
Well, you think, for example, in the intelligence arena. We ask those people to do some very difficult things. Sometimes, that put their own lives at risk. They do so at the direction of the president, and they do so with the — in this case, we had specific legal authority from the Justice Department. And if they are now going to be subject to being investigated and prosecuted by the next administration, nobody’s going to sign up for those kinds of missions.It’s a very, very devastating, I think, effect that it has on morale inside the intelligence community. If they assume that they’re going to have to be dealing with the political consequences — and it’s clearly a political move. I mean, there’s no other rationale for why they’re doing this — then they’ll be very reluctant in the future to do that.
Back in the real world, former Vice President Dick Cheney’s decisions to embrace illegality and instruct CIA operatives to carry it out have resulted in the actual convictions in absentia of 23 people. What do you think the odds are that Cheney will pay deSouza’s legal bills with all his oil money?
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
6 Comments
Pingback posted November 5, 2009 @ 1:45 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by pacaschera and John Lavis, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Dick Cheney, Meet Sabrina deSouza http://bit.ly/2AShR6 [...]
Trackback posted November 5, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Dick Cheney, Meet Sabrina deSouza http://bit.ly/2AShR6...
Comment posted November 5, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
We ask those people to do some very difficult things.
And, apparently, quite illegal.
[W]e had specific legal authority from the Justice Department.
To break the laws of an allied country?
And if they are now going to be subject to being investigated and prosecuted by the next administration, nobody’s going to sign up for those kinds of missions.
In a, nominally at least, democracy that respects the rule of law, I would think that wouldn't be a problem…
Pingback posted November 5, 2009 @ 5:03 pm
[...] Source [...]
Comment posted December 14, 2009 @ 8:41 pm
Strictly speaking, who cares if they violated Italian law? Did they violate US law (including int'l treaties)??
So they won't be vacationing in Italy (or anywhere with an extradition treaty with them ;)
Comment posted December 15, 2009 @ 1:41 am
Strictly speaking, who cares if they violated Italian law? Did they violate US law (including int'l treaties)??
So they won't be vacationing in Italy (or anywhere with an extradition treaty with them ;)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss