Comments on: Obama’s Improbable Social Security Attack http://washingtonindependent.com/6668/obamas-improbable-social-security-attack National News in Context Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: exercise routine http://washingtonindependent.com/6668/obamas-improbable-social-security-attack/comment-page-1#comment-226591 exercise routine Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:39:06 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=6668#comment-226591 <strong>Thank you......</strong> I love this blog. Its great. Keep it up man.... Thank you……

I love this blog. Its great. Keep it up man….

]]> By: fitness program http://washingtonindependent.com/6668/obamas-improbable-social-security-attack/comment-page-1#comment-226195 fitness program Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:12:42 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=6668#comment-226195 <strong>Thank you......</strong> Good journey and experience!... Thank you……

Good journey and experience!…

]]> By: hewhoasks http://washingtonindependent.com/6668/obamas-improbable-social-security-attack/comment-page-1#comment-37498 hewhoasks Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:31:46 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=6668#comment-37498 Given that the Republican-dominated Congress refused to pass any form of "personal account" scheme under Bush it's likely true that no matter what McCain favors the Congress won't deliver it. <br><br>Nonetheless, that McCain does favor such a scheme is significant. McCain's position reflects his attitudes and his priorities. The underlying message from Obama seems to be that McCain is not committed to helping the average person. That matters. McCain favors something that not even a Republican-dominated Congress would enact (heck, they never even really introduced enabling legislation, they were so unenamored of the idea.) If McCain is a "maverick" here he's a "maverick" completely in sync with George W. Bush and the interests who back Bush and who want to destroy Social Security for reasons that are utterly remote from any desire to provide retirement security to Americans. <br><br>Or does the independent think that Social Security is so inconsequential that the label "improbable" can be hung on Obama? Given that the Republican-dominated Congress refused to pass any form of “personal account” scheme under Bush it's likely true that no matter what McCain favors the Congress won't deliver it.

Nonetheless, that McCain does favor such a scheme is significant. McCain's position reflects his attitudes and his priorities. The underlying message from Obama seems to be that McCain is not committed to helping the average person. That matters. McCain favors something that not even a Republican-dominated Congress would enact (heck, they never even really introduced enabling legislation, they were so unenamored of the idea.) If McCain is a “maverick” here he's a “maverick” completely in sync with George W. Bush and the interests who back Bush and who want to destroy Social Security for reasons that are utterly remote from any desire to provide retirement security to Americans.

Or does the independent think that Social Security is so inconsequential that the label “improbable” can be hung on Obama?

]]> By: hewhoasks http://washingtonindependent.com/6668/obamas-improbable-social-security-attack/comment-page-1#comment-6881 hewhoasks Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:31:46 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=6668#comment-6881 Given that the Republican-dominated Congress refused to pass any form of "personal account" scheme under Bush it's likely true that no matter what McCain favors the Congress won't deliver it. <br><br>Nonetheless, that McCain does favor such a scheme is significant. McCain's position reflects his attitudes and his priorities. The underlying message from Obama seems to be that McCain is not committed to helping the average person. That matters. McCain favors something that not even a Republican-dominated Congress would enact (heck, they never even really introduced enabling legislation, they were so unenamored of the idea.) If McCain is a "maverick" here he's a "maverick" completely in sync with George W. Bush and the interests who back Bush and who want to destroy Social Security for reasons that are utterly remote from any desire to provide retirement security to Americans. <br><br>Or does the independent think that Social Security is so inconsequential that the label "improbable" can be hung on Obama? Given that the Republican-dominated Congress refused to pass any form of “personal account” scheme under Bush it's likely true that no matter what McCain favors the Congress won't deliver it.

Nonetheless, that McCain does favor such a scheme is significant. McCain's position reflects his attitudes and his priorities. The underlying message from Obama seems to be that McCain is not committed to helping the average person. That matters. McCain favors something that not even a Republican-dominated Congress would enact (heck, they never even really introduced enabling legislation, they were so unenamored of the idea.) If McCain is a “maverick” here he's a “maverick” completely in sync with George W. Bush and the interests who back Bush and who want to destroy Social Security for reasons that are utterly remote from any desire to provide retirement security to Americans.

Or does the independent think that Social Security is so inconsequential that the label “improbable” can be hung on Obama?

]]>