Berman’s Response to Goldstone on House Gaza War-Crimes Resolution

By
Monday, November 02, 2009 at 6:19 pm

Last week, Richard Goldstone, who investigated Israeli and Hamas war crimes in Gaza for the United Nations, wrote to Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) to say that a resolution co-sponsored by Berman, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, denouncing Goldstone’s report was significantly factually inaccurate. A spokeswoman for Berman, Lynne Weil, told me that the chairman would reply to Goldstone before the resolution would be debated, a move scheduled for Tuesday. She said that Goldstone committed some factual inaccuracies in his letter, but did not specify.

Berman just now replied to the U.N. investigator and South African judge, in the form of a letter to colleagues. He concedes practically nothing to Goldstone. The full reply is after the jump.

Dear Colleague:

Last week, Justice Richard Goldstone sent us and other Members a memorandum outlining his “strong reservations about the text of the resolution” (H.Res.867) that will be voted upon by the House tomorrow. We have the utmost respect for Justice Goldstone, but we disagree with his criticisms of H.Res.867.  Our primary concerns are as follows:

–The mandate of the commission Justice Goldstone chaired (“The United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict”) was one-sided and biased, and, even though Justice Goldstone made earnest efforts to alter the mandate, he did not fully succeed, as we indicate below.  We intend to alter the resolution to take account of Justice Goldstone’s effort.

–The commission’s report lacks context.  It does not take account of the nature of Israel’s enemy – operating from the midst of civilian populations, committed to Israel’s destruction, and fully supported by state actors Iran and Syria.  (In fact, it is rather dismissive of claims that Hamas operated from amidst civilian populations.)  The report generally gives short shrift to Hamas’ relentless rocket attacks on Israeli civilians, over a period of eight years, which precipitated the war.

–The report does not take into account the extent to which witnesses from Gaza were likely intimidated by Hamas.

–In general, the report is credulous of Hamas claims but skeptical of Israeli claims.

We would like to share with you, below, my point-by-point analysis of Justice Goldstone’s comments.

Sincerely,

HOWARD L. BERMAN, Chairman             GARY L. ACKERMAN, Chairman

Committee on Foreign Affairs                    Subcommittee on the Middle East

and South Asia

Letter and Response

[Note: Justice Goldstone counts the descriptive paragraph as Paragraph 1. Therefore, “Paragraph 3” refers to Whereas 2 (and accordingly throughout his text).]

[Goldstone:]

“MEMORANDUM

FROM:   RICHARD GOLDSTONE

TO:         INTERESTED PERSONS

RE:         HR 867

“Here are some comments on this resolution in an effort to correct factual errors:
1. Paragraph 3:That is why I and others refused the original mandate – it only called for an investigation into violations committed by Israel. The mandate given to and accepted by me and under which we worked and reported reads as follows:
‘. . .to investigate all violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law that might have been committed at any time in the context of the military operations that were conducted in Gaza during the period from 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009, whether before, during or after.’

“That mandate clearly included rocket and mortar attacks on Israel and as the report makes clear was so interpreted and implemented. It was the report with that mandate that was adopted by the Human Rights Council and that included the serious findings made against Hamas and other militant Palestinian groups.”

Response: The broadened mandate Justice Goldstone sought was discussed, but not voted on, at a UNHRC plenary session. It was then announced via a press release in an altered formulation, more restrictive than the formulation envisioned by Justice Goldstone. The UNHRC did not create a new mandate. The only relevant mandate remained the one which includes operational paragraph 14 of UNHRC resolution A/HRC/S-9/L.1, as was accepted by the Council on January 12, 2009. The January 12 mandate was also the only mandate referenced in the October 16 UNHRC resolution that adopted the Report.

This whereas clause focuses on the mandate. Of course, the far more important issue is the Report itself, which makes only limited mention of the rocket attacks on Israel.

[Goldstone:] “2. Paragraph 4: This is factually incorrect. Chapter XXIV of the Report considers in detail the relentless rocket attacks from Gaza on Israel and the terror it caused to the people living within their range. The finding is made that they constituted serious war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity.”

Response: Paragraph 4 [Whereas #3] of H.Res.867 is addressing the mandate, not the Report. It reads as follows: “Whereas the mandate of the ‘‘fact-finding mission’’ makes no mention of the relentless rocket and mortar attacks, which numbered in the thousands and spanned a period of eight years, by Hamas and other violent militant groups in Gaza against civilian targets in Israel, that necessitated Israel’s defensive measures”. That statement is an accurate characterization of both the formal mandate, as passed by the UNHRC, and of the broadened mandate requested by Justice Goldstone.

[Goldstone:] “3. Paragraph 5: The member concerned, Professor Christine Chinkin of the London School of Economics, in the same letter, together with other leading international lawyers, also condemned as war crimes the Hamas rockets fired into Israel.”

Response: The letter Professor Chinkin signed, which was published in the British press in mid-January, did indeed accuse Hamas of war crimes. But it also accused Israel of war crimes, months before the investigation began, clearly prejudging the outcome of the investigation regarding both parties. In my view, Professor Chinkin should have been disqualified from serving on the commission, based on her having signed the letter. The UN watchdog UN Watch notes that Justice Goldstone himself admitted in an August interview that the signature “would have been grounds for disqualification” if the commission had constituted a formal judicial inquiry.

[Goldstone:] “4. Paragraph 6: The mandate that was given to the Mission was certainly not opposed by all or even a majority of the States to which reference is made. That is factually incorrect. I am happy to provide further details if necessary.”

Response: H.Res.867 uses the phrase “refused to support,” not “opposed by,” as Justice Goldstone suggests. The language of H.Res.867 was carefully chosen to include those nations who voted no, those who abstained, and those who chose not to vote at all, i.e., all those who “refused to support.”

[Goldstone:] “5. Paragraph 7: This too is factually incorrect. The mandate that had been rejected was the one I rejected. Mary Robinson, for example, has written in support of the mandate given to and accepted by me.”

Response:  As indicated above, the formal mandate is that contained in the UNHRC Resolution A/HRC/S-9/L.1.

[Goldstone:] “6. Paragraph 9: The words quoted relate to the decision we made that it would have been unfair to investigate and make finding on situations where decisions had been made by Israeli soldiers ‘in the fog of battle’. This was a decision made in favor and not against the interests of Israel.

“I do not consider that it is fair or just to label the findings as ’sweeping and unsubstantiated determinations’.”

Response: When summarizing the results of investigations into alleged Israeli attacks on Palestinian civilians, the Report states that “the Mission found in every case [except one] that the Israeli armed forces had carried out direct intentional strikes against civilians” and that “in none of the cases reviewed were there any grounds which could have reasonably induced the Israeli armed forces to assume that the civilians attacked were in fact taking a direct part in the hostilities…”

The assertion regarding “intentional strikes” is particularly mystifying. The Report does not take into account that Israeli soldiers were operating under fire, in an extremely volatile and dangerous environment, in which the enemy was hiding amongst a civilian population.

Nor does the Report generally take into account that testimony from Gazans was given under the watchful eye of Hamas officials. Moreover, the commission heard, at best, only one side of the story, since Israel, despairing of the biased mandate, chose not to participate. Whatever the wisdom of that Israeli decision – and, as indicated below, I do find it understandable – the Report at least should have acknowledged that Israeli non-participation limited the commission’s ability to reach firm conclusions.

[Goldstone:] 7. Paragraph 11: What I had explained to The Forward was that the Report itself would not constitute evidence admissible in court of law and that investigators would have to investigate which allegations they considered relevant. That, too, was why we recommended domestic investigations into the allegations. The remark as quoted is both inaccurate and taken completely out of context.”

Response: Here is the relevant quote, as well as the passages that directly precede and follow it, taken directly from the article in the Jewish Daily Forward:

“Goldstone defended the report’s reliance on eyewitness accounts, noting his mission had cross-checked those accounts against each other and sought corroboration from photos, satellite photos, contemporaneous reports, forensic evidence and the mission’s own inspections of the sites in question.

For all that gathered information, though, he said, “We had to do the best we could with the material we had. If this was a court of law, there would have been nothing proven.”

Goldstone emphasized that his conclusion that war crimes had been committed was always intended as conditional. He still hopes that independent investigations carried out by Israel and the Palestinians will use the allegations as, he said, “a useful road map.””

http://www.forward.com/articles/116269/

We consider the quote in the whereas to be fully in context.

[Goldstone:] “8. Paragraph 12: It is again factually incorrect to state that the Report denied Israel the right of self-defense. The Report examined how that right was implemented by the standards of international law. What is commonly called ius ad bellum, the right to use military force was not considered to fall within our mandate. Israel’s right to use military force was not questioned.”

Response: We use the phrase “in effect” in our clause because the Report does not explore why Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorist aggression perpetrated by a non-state actor. Justice Goldstone says that “the right to use military force was not considered to fall within our mandate.” Yet, he went beyond his mandate in several other areas of the Report, including discussion of Israel’s policies throughout the occupied territories (including the West Bank) and recommendations that were not called for by the UNHRC resolution that established the mandate.  An acknowledgement of Israel’s right of self-defense would have provided vital context to the issues raised in the Report.

[Goldstone:] “9. Paragraph 13: This is the first suggestion that I have come across to the effect that we should have investigated the provenance of the rockets. It was simply not on the agenda, and in any event, we would not have had the facilities or capability of investigating these allegations. If the Government of Israel has requested us to investigate that issue I have no doubt that we have done our best to do so.”

Response: As noted, Justice Goldstone’s Report went beyond its mandate in several respects; looking at the roles of Iran and Syria in assisting Hamas certainly would have provided critical context to the Report.  Iran and Syria enable Hamas’ terrorism. The assistance Hamas receives from outside actors allows the Hamas terrorist organization to attack Israel incessantly, certain in the knowledge that its arsenals will be replenished.

Hamas’ support by state actors makes it a formidable foe. The report should have considered that geopolitical context.

[Goldstone:] “10. Paragraph 14: This is a sweeping and unfair characterization of the Report. I hope that the Report will be read by those tasked with considering the resolution.”

Response:   The Report uncritically attributes numerous statements to “Gaza Authorities” (meaning, Hamas), while often casting doubt on information derived from the international and Israeli press and from non-government-affiliated Israelis.

For example, the Report criticizes the fact that an Israeli Government web-post cites a Newsweek article reporting on Hamas depredations against its own population and casts doubt on the accuracy of the article.  According to the Report, the citing of the Newsweek article, far from being an effort to invoke a neutral source, is merely evidence that Israel itself finds the Newsweek report unconvincing, since Israel does not adduce evidence from its own internal sources (p.143 paragraphs 612-614). This is an odd criticism, since intelligence information, no matter how compelling, is only rarely disclosed to the public.

Perhaps most tellingly, the Report appears only to cite Israeli statements when it finds such statements a useful basis for criticizing Israel. For example:

Section 41 – “The Mission examined the mortar shelling of al-Fakhura junction in Jabaliyah next to a UNRWA school, which, at the time, was sheltering more than 1,300 people (chap. X). The Israeli armed forces launched at least four mortar shells. One landed in the courtyard of a family home, killing 11 people assembled there. Three other shells landed on al-Fakhura Street, killing at least a further 24 people and injuring as many as 40. The Mission examined in detail statements by Israeli Government representatives alleging that the attack was launched in response to a mortar attack from an armed Palestinian group. While the Mission does not exclude that this may have been the case, it considers the credibility of Israel’s position damaged by the series of inconsistencies, contradictions and factual inaccuracies in the statements justifying the attack.”

Section 702 – “The Mission views as being unreliable the versions given by the Israeli authorities. The confusion as to what was hit, the erroneous allegations of who was specifically hit and where the armed groups were firing from, the indication that Israeli surveillance watched the scene but nonetheless could not detect where the strikes occurred, all combine to give the impression of either profound confusion or obfuscation.”

By contrast, the Report is far more forgiving when discussing contradictions in Palestinian evidence:

Section 1092 – “There are some minor inconsistencies, which are not, in the opinion of the Mission, sufficiently weighty to cast doubt on the general reliability of Majdi Abd Rabbo. There are also, not surprisingly, some elements of the long account which appear in some versions and not in others. The Mission finds that these inconsistencies do not undermine the credibility of Majdi Abd Rabbo’s account.”

[Goldstone:] “11. Paragraph 16: Again, this is an unfair and selective quotation taken out of context.”

Response: Our whereas clause reads as follows: “Whereas in one notable instance, the report stated that it did not consider the admission of a Hamas official that Hamas often ‘‘created a human shield of women, children, the elderly and the mujahideen, against [the Israeli military]’’ specifically to ‘‘constitute evidence that Hamas forced Palestinian civilians to shield military objectives against attack.’’

This quote was not taken out of context, and it can be found in Sections 477 and 478 of the Report, as follows:

“The Mission is also aware of the public statement by Mr. Fathi Hammad, a Hamas member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, on 29 February 2009, which is adduced as evidence of Hamas’ use of human shields. Mr. Hammad reportedly stated that:

…the Palestinian people has developed its [methods] of death seeking. For the Palestinian people, death became an industry, at which women excel and so do all people on this land: the elderly excel, the mujahideen excel and the children excel. Accordingly, [Hamas] created a human shield of women, children, the elderly and the mujahideen, against the Zionist bombing machine.

478. Although the Mission finds this statement morally repugnant, it does not consider it to constitute evidence that Hamas forced Palestinian civilians to shield military objectives against attack. The Government of Israel has not identified any such cases.

The Report also displays numerous examples of credulousness regarding Hamas behavior. For example:

p. 117: “While, in the light of the above reports, the Mission does not discount the use of booby traps by the Palestinian armed groups, it has no basis to conclude that civilian lives were put at risk, as none of the reports record the presence of civilians in or near the houses in which booby traps are alleged to have been set.”

p. 117: “Although the Mission was not able to investigate the allegation of the use of mosques generally by Palestinian groups for storing weapons, it did investigate the incident of a missile attack by the Israeli armed forces against al-Maqadmah mosque on the outskirts of Jabaliyah camp, in which at least 15 people were killed and 40 injured on 3 January 2009 (see chap. XI). The Mission found no evidence that this mosque was used for the storage of weapons or any military activity by Palestinian armed groups. As far as this mosque is concerned, therefore, the Mission found no basis for such an allegation. However, the Mission is unable to make a determination regarding the allegation in general nor with respect to any other mosque that was attacked by the Israeli armed forces during the military operations.”

p. 121: “On the basis of the information it gathered, the Mission finds that there are indications that Palestinian armed groups launched rockets from urban areas. The mission has not been able to obtain any direct evidence that this was done with the specific intent of shielding the rocket launchers from counterstrokes by the Israeli armed forces.”

p. 121: “The Mission finds that the presence of Palestinian armed fighters in urban residential areas during the military operations is established. On the basis of the information it gathered, the Mission is unable to form an opinion on the exact nature or the intensity of their combat activities in urban residential areas that would have placed the civilian population and civilian objects at risk of attack. While reports reviewed by the Mission credibly indicate that members of Palestinian armed groups were not always dressed in a way that distinguished them from civilians, the Mission found no evidence that Palestinian combatants mingled with the civilian population with the intention of shielding themselves from attack.”
[Goldstone:] “12. Paragraph 17: That Hamas was able to shape the findings or that it pre-screened the witnesses is devoid of truth and I challenge anyone to produce evidence in support of it.”

Response: The evidence is within the Report itself.  Page 111 of the Report reads as follows: “In its efforts to gather more direct information on the subject, during its investigations in Gaza and in interviews with victims and witnesses of incidents and other informed individuals, the Mission raised questions regarding the conduct of Palestinian armed groups during the hostilities in Gaza. The Mission notes that those interviewed in Gaza appeared reluctant to speak about the presence of or conduct of hostilities by the Palestinian armed groups. Whatever the reasons for their reluctance, the Mission does not discount that the interviewees’ reluctance may have stemmed from a fear of reprisals.”

Hamas is in full control of Gaza, and this “fear of reprisals” significantly helped Hamas shape the findings. See, for example, an Amnesty International publication that reports on how Hamas murdered its rivals while operation Cast Lead was ongoing: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/hamas-waged-deadly-campaign-war-devastated-gaza-20090212.

Furthermore, the commission conducted some of its proceedings through holding televised open hearings in Gaza. Given its total control of Gaza and its ability to intimidate, Hamas almost certainly would have been able to control the access and message of each witness attending a televised open hearing. What is beyond doubt is that witnesses were keenly aware that Hamas was monitoring the televised proceedings and likely to inflict reprisals for any unwelcome testimony.

[Goldstone:] “Finally, I note that there is not a word to record that notwithstanding repeated pleas to the Government of Israel, it refused all cooperation with the Mission. Amongst others, I requested the views of Israel with regard to the implementation of the mandate and details of any issues that the Government of Israel might wish us to investigate.”

Response: Justice Goldstone is correct. The Government of Israel decided not to cooperate with the Mission, based on its biased mandate, as well as the UNHRC’s long history of anti-Israel bias. I find that position, at the least, understandable.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

58 Comments

uberVU - social comments
Trackback posted November 2, 2009 @ 6:50 pm

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TWI_news: Berman’s Response To Goldstone On House Gaza War-Crimes Resolution http://bit.ly/1ixOdb...


US Congressman Berman stifles Goldstone by citing UN Watch report at View from Geneva
Pingback posted November 2, 2009 @ 6:55 pm

[...] U.S. Congress today cited a UN Watch report when it stifled Judge Richard Goldstone’s objections to a draft resolution [...]


Your Israel lobby at work: Howard Berman describes Palestinian fighters as ‘the enemy’
Pingback posted November 2, 2009 @ 7:11 pm

[...] Berman, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has responded to Judge Goldstone’s vigorous defense of his report–preparatory to the vote in the House tomorrow on Berman’s bill to denounce Goldstone. [...]


colindale
Comment posted November 3, 2009 @ 2:27 am

Now is the time for Europe to divorce itself from the AIPAC-controlled, American foreign policy on Israel that accepts gross human rights violations i.e. the killing of 900 civilians in Gaza, in January last, which included the deliberate killing of 320 children and the illegal use of white phosphorus as a chemical weapon.

Obviously the United States will act as it, or the American Israel lobby group, sees fit – but Europe will hopefully conform to the principles of democracy, international law, the Geneva Conventions on Human Rights and basic morality.

The armies of western democratic nations would never be ordered to target civilians, unarmed women and innocent children. It is incumbent, therefore, for Europe to show its condemnation of such acts of barbarity.


Awamori
Comment posted November 3, 2009 @ 6:59 am

Bravo! I wonder, how will Goldstone respond to that?

And one more point:

According to Al Jazeera, the impetus for the Goldstone Commission report came from the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)

The OIC, it should be remembered, opposed the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir. In other words, in the view of the OIC international law is war by other means. It is an instrument to be used for its members' benefit or ignored if inconvenient.


Awamori
Comment posted November 3, 2009 @ 7:03 am

Common, don't be ridiculous! There were many hundreds of innocent civilians killed by the ” armies of western democratic nations ” in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan.


knowbuddhau
Comment posted November 3, 2009 @ 11:13 am

Your comment echoes in a grand canyon of historical ignorance.

The ghosts of Wounded Knee, of Dresden, Hamburg, Nagasaki, Hiroshima, of Southeast Asia, the Americas, and uncounted others incinerated by “the armies of western democracies,” say you're wrong.

For example, the firestorms of Hamburg and Dresden were deliberately created to see what could be done with incessant aerial bombardment of cities.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In 1941 Charles Portal of the British Air Staff advocated that entire cities and towns should be bombed. Portal claimed that this would quickly bring about the collapse of civilian morale in Germany. Air Marshall Arthur Harris agreed and when he became head of RAF Bomber Command in February 1942, he introduced a policy of area bombing (known in Germany as terror bombing) where entire cities and towns were targeted.

One tactic used by the Royal Air Force and the United States Army Air Force was the creation of firestorms. This was achieved by dropping incendiary bombs, filled with highly combustible chemicals such as magnesium, phosphorus or petroleum jelly (napalm), in clusters over a specific target. After the area caught fire, the air above the bombed area, become extremely hot and rose rapidly. Cold air then rushed in at ground level from the outside and people were sucked into the fire. The most notable examples of this tactic being used was in Hamburg (August, 1943), Dresden (February, 1945) and Tokyo (March 1945).

[...]

1) Alexander McKee, Dresden 1945: the Devil's Tinderbox (1982)

From a firestorm there is small chance of escape. Certain conditions had to be present, such as the concentration of high buildings and a concentration of bombers in time and space, which produced so many huge fires so rapidly and so close together that the air above them super-heated and drew the flames out explosively. On the enormous scale of a large city, the roaring rush of heated air upwards developed the characteristics and power of a tornado, strong enough to pick up people and such them into the flames.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWfiresto…

How's that for your angelic armies?


dan
Comment posted November 3, 2009 @ 12:18 pm

The real context is that the US should not be involved in what the current Israeli government is doing: house demolitions, refusing building permits to Palelstinians, forced resettling of Bedouins, protecting settlers who are illegally on Palestinian land … as a former South African I follow in detail what is going on and it is all very similar to apartheid. I do not wish my tax money to go towards this. It is setting the US up for future disaster and it limits our policy options. It is unconscionable the way a small percentage of the US population can control our politicians and media on this issue. The fault is with the politicians, Jews who disagree with AIPAC are finally speaking up. Because so much of our money goes to Israel, a huge amount is given to the corrupt gov. of Egypt. All of us who pay the money to these two need to see how it is spent.


dan
Comment posted November 3, 2009 @ 5:18 pm

The real context is that the US should not be involved in what the current Israeli government is doing: house demolitions, refusing building permits to Palelstinians, forced resettling of Bedouins, protecting settlers who are illegally on Palestinian land … as a former South African I follow in detail what is going on and it is all very similar to apartheid. I do not wish my tax money to go towards this. It is setting the US up for future disaster and it limits our policy options. It is unconscionable the way a small percentage of the US population can control our politicians and media on this issue. The fault is with the politicians, Jews who disagree with AIPAC are finally speaking up. Because so much of our money goes to Israel, a huge amount is given to the corrupt gov. of Egypt. All of us who pay the money to these two need to see how it is spent.


The Day In Israel: Wed Nov 4th, 2009 : Israellycool
Pingback posted November 4, 2009 @ 1:15 am

[...] here is a response to Goldstone from one of the co-sponsors of the resolution, Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif., after the [...]


No bark dog collar
Comment posted February 19, 2011 @ 8:39 am

Thanks for the post. This keeps me informed about the topic.


3313532
Comment posted September 5, 2011 @ 9:37 pm

3313532 beers on the wall. sck was here


Cheap Jordan shoes,Nike air max shoes,Supra Shoes,UGG Boots,CL pumps,Polo,Lacoste t-shirts,True Religion Jeans,LV,Coach handbags,brand name sunglasses,NFL,NHL,MLB,NBA Jerseys
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 2:16 am

Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely helpful info specifically the last part I care for such info much. I was looking for this particular information for a very long time. I will keep the attention of your blog. Thank you and have a nice day.


Loura Fabello
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:09 am

Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.


Cheap Jordan shoes,Nike air max shoes,Supra Shoes,UGG Boots,CL pumps,Polo,Lacoste t-shirts,True Religion Jeans,LV,Coach handbags,brand name sunglasses,NFL,NHL,MLB,NBA Jerseys
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:21 am

Excellent post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed! Very useful info particularly the last part I care for such info much. I was looking for this certain information for a long time. I will keep the attention of your blog. Thank you and have a nice day.


Mayra Dragun
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:27 am

This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.


InterGardening
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 4:08 am

This website is mostly a stroll-by for the entire data you needed about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse right here, and you’ll definitely uncover it.


ecotourism
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 5:03 am

Thank you for every one of your efforts on this blog. Betty really loves going through investigation and it’s really simple to grasp why. My spouse and i learn all about the dynamic method you render very important information on this web site and as well as encourage participation from other individuals about this area plus our favorite daughter has been learning so much. Enjoy the remaining portion of the year. You are doing a brilliant job.


dry clutch
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 5:15 am

I intended to post you the very little remark just to thank you so much again with your awesome solutions you have discussed on this page. This is really tremendously generous of you to give easily what exactly a lot of people might have supplied as an electronic book to generate some dough for their own end, precisely considering the fact that you could have done it in case you desired. These solutions also worked to be a fantastic way to recognize that other people online have the identical zeal like my very own to know the truth a whole lot more when it comes to this problem. I am sure there are many more pleasant times ahead for many who looked over your blog post.


opticians in hampshire
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 6:57 am

You made some decent factors there. I seemed on the internet for the issue and found most individuals will associate with with your website.


law firms in newport
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 9:33 am

I simply wished to thank you very much all over again. I do not know the things I would have accomplished without those information provided by you relating to my theme. It truly was the challenging scenario for me, however , looking at your professional fashion you processed it made me to jump with happiness. I’m grateful for the work and as well , sincerely hope you find out what a powerful job you have been doing teaching some other people by way of your web blog. More than likely you haven’t encountered any of us.


tinnitus cure
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 11:11 am

Good day! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.


learn how to get more women
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 11:14 am

Really like your websites particulars! Undoubtedly an exquisite provide of data that is extremely helpful. Keep on to carry publishing and that i’m gonna proceed studying by means of! Cheers.


asking a girl out
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 11:31 am

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If doable, as you acquire expertise, would you mind updating your weblog with additional info? It is extremely helpful for me.


tinnitus remedies
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 11:34 am

Hi! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this post to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!


celebrity interviews pavlina
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 11:45 am

I am not really excellent with English but I get hold this rattling easy to understand.


attract girls
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 1:02 pm

Actually like your web sites details! Undoubtedly a beautiful offer of information that is extraordinarily helpful. Keep on to hold publishing and i’m gonna proceed studying by way of! Cheers.


tyre companies in swansea
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 1:24 pm

I would like to show some appreciation to this writer for rescuing me from this type of dilemma. Just after looking out through the world wide web and finding ideas which were not productive, I thought my entire life was done. Living devoid of the answers to the difficulties you have sorted out as a result of this short post is a crucial case, and the kind which might have negatively damaged my entire career if I hadn’t encountered the blog. Your natural talent and kindness in playing with every part was vital. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I hadn’t come upon such a step like this. I can also now look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for your impressive and amazing help. I won’t be reluctant to suggest your blog to anybody who ought to have tips on this subject.


site whois
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 1:29 pm

Wohh exactly what I was looking for, appreciate it for putting up.


Eye glasses Colorado Springs
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 2:47 pm

You have brought up a very great points, thank you for the post.


porsche service fountain valley
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:18 pm

Some really excellent info, Gladiolus I noticed this.


Car Repair Irvine
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:25 pm

Merely to follow up on the update of this theme on your web site and wish to let you know how much I liked the time you took to produce this beneficial post. Within the post, you spoke on how to definitely handle this concern with all convenience. It would be my pleasure to build up some more thoughts from your site and come up to offer people what I have learned from you. I appreciate your usual wonderful effort.


Smong Check Irvine
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:29 pm

You are a very intelligent person!


Colorado Springs Painters
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 4:02 pm

What’s Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely useful and it has helped me out loads. I’m hoping to give a contribution & assist other users like its helped me. Good job.


small portable printer
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 4:22 pm

I intended to write you this little note to thank you very much over again for your personal incredible tricks you have shared here. It was incredibly generous with people like you to deliver freely just what many individuals would have advertised as an electronic book to end up making some bucks for their own end, specifically since you could possibly have done it in case you considered necessary. These concepts additionally worked like a great way to fully grasp other individuals have the identical fervor like mine to grasp somewhat more when it comes to this matter. I am sure there are a lot more pleasant sessions ahead for many who see your blog post.


Seo Consultants Denver Co
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 4:50 pm

I like this web site it’s a master piece! Glad I found this on google.


lavorare miami
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 6:33 pm

Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something informative to read?


compro oro
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 6:50 pm

My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on a variety of websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it? Any help would be greatly appreciated!


Vada Cranmore
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 7:30 pm

Your place is valuable for me. Thanks!…


Shaunte Coache
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 7:47 pm

I discovered your blog site on google and check a few of your early posts. Continue to keep up the very good work. I just added your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you later on!…


faith
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 7:52 pm

Enjoyed reading this, very good stuff, thankyou . “What the United States does best is to understand itself. What it does worst is understand others.” by Carlos Fuentes.


free amateur sex tube
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 8:22 pm

WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …


World Famous Waste of Time
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 9:26 pm

Hi my friend! I want to say that this post is awesome, nice written and come with approximately all vital infos. I would like to peer more posts like this.


best place to sell gold
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 9:51 pm

For the last tenmonths I have been going to a jewelry shop to sell our gold rings and I have never came out with more than $500. Think of my happiness when I attemped http://www.sellgold-online.com and they sent me a check for $480 for moregold! That’s quadruple what the pawn shop paid me!


PDF to ePub Reader
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 10:52 pm

I like this web blog very much so much fantastic information.


ceramic
Comment posted September 6, 2011 @ 11:45 pm

Only a smiling visitant here to share the love (:, btw outstanding layout. “Reading well is one of the great pleasures that solitude can afford you.” by Harold Bloom.


cheap mbt shoes
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 12:52 am

I wanted to construct a remark to be able to express gratitude to you for some of the wonderful tactics you are giving out on this site. My time-consuming internet lookup has finally been compensated with extremely good points to share with my co-workers. I would state that that we readers actually are undoubtedly endowed to dwell in a fabulous website with so many brilliant people with beneficial concepts. I feel really happy to have used the web site and look forward to tons of more pleasurable times reading here. Thanks a lot once again for everything.


Replica Watches
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 12:53 am

Just about all of whatever you mention happens to be supprisingly appropriate and that makes me ponder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light before. This particular piece really did switch the light on for me personally as far as this issue goes. Nonetheless at this time there is 1 issue I am not necessarily too comfortable with so whilst I try to reconcile that with the central idea of your position, let me observe just what all the rest of your visitors have to say.Nicely done.


matta scarves
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 1:18 am

I have learn a few excellent stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how much attempt you set to make the sort of excellent informative site.


android shop
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 1:35 am

But wanna comment on few general things, The website design and style is perfect, the content is rattling great. “Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.” by Andre Gide.


Discount Moncler Sweater
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 3:27 am

know all of the dynamic medium you provide simple


karpacz
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 6:36 am

Its like you read my own thoughts! You seem to know so much about it, like you wrote the book in it or something. I’m sure that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home a little bit, but instead of that, this is exactly wonderful web site. A good read. I’ll certainly be back again.


Dominique
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 7:58 am

I am always browsing online for articles that can aid me. Thank you!


caudalimetro precio
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 10:20 am

You can certainly see your expertise in the work you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to say how they believe. All the time go after your heart. “No man should marry until he has studied anatomy and dissected at least one woman.” by Honore’ de Balzac.


exchange 2003 cannot sync iPhone
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 10:49 am

Very interesting details you have remarked, appreciate it for putting up. “You can tell the ideas of a nation by it’s advertisements.” by Douglas South Wind.


Buzz To Save
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 11:07 am

That is really fascinating, You are a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your feed and look forward to searching for extra of your wonderful post. Additionally, I have shared your website in my social networks!


Little Blue Kangaroo
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 11:17 am

I do not even know how I stopped up right here, however I assumed this put up was once great. I do not recognise who you might be however certainly you are going to a well-known blogger when you are not already ;) Cheers!


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.