DNC to McCain: How You Like Privatization Now?
Friday, September 19, 2008 at 4:58 pm
The DNC is gleefully circulating an AP article that flags another obvious, but important, shortcoming of Sen. John McCain’s domestic platform when viewed under the harsh light of the market crisis.
The Democrats observe: “In an AP article today, Glen Johnson highlights the difficulty John McCain is having trying to explain his long held position in support of George Bush’s failed 2005 privatization of Social Security in the wake of this week’s economic turmoil.”
The article reports that McCain’s privatization position now looks like bad policy and terrible politics:
McCain defends retirement accounts amid stock dive
Wall Street turmoil [left McCain] defending his support for privately investing Social Security money in the same markets that had tanked earlier in the week…. A headline Friday in the Manchester, N.H., Union Leader, the leading paper in that battleground state, underscored the political challenge. “Pension funds for workers take a hit,” read a story about a roughly $500 million decline the past three months in the state’s public pension fund.
McCain counters that he does not support full-bore “privatization.” He has not exactly been pushing the issue at all, recently. Social Security is unlikely to break through as a national campaign issue right now, either, but it could gain traction in swing states with large elderly populations. The Republicans’ old promises to shrink government and ‘Let The Market Decide’ just don’t have the same ring.
2 Comments
Comment posted September 20, 2008 @ 3:26 am
Ari, I'd be interested in how you'd weigh in on the following: that the current economic crisis was precipitated by the creeping politicization of lending policies, ie. the pressuring of appropriations committees to influence financial institutions (particularly those with federal backing) to provide loans on the basis of demographics rather than credit strength (how the market would decide). Skewing the responsibility to private institutions is a diversion from first causes (though I concede that they probably don't fly on angel's wings).
Comment posted September 20, 2008 @ 8:26 am
Ari, I'd be interested in how you'd weigh in on the following: that the current economic crisis was precipitated by the creeping politicization of lending policies, ie. the pressuring of appropriations committees to influence financial institutions (particularly those with federal backing) to provide loans on the basis of demographics rather than credit strength (how the market would decide). Skewing the responsibility to private institutions is a diversion from first causes (though I concede that they probably don't fly on angel's wings).
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss