<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Johnsen Opposition Mum on Possible Filibuster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis vuitton handbags</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-181811</link>
		<dc:creator>louis vuitton handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-181811</guid>
		<description>These critics have no tolerance for any viewpoint that doesn&#039;t march in lockstep with their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These critics have no tolerance for any viewpoint that doesn&#39;t march in lockstep with their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutlem</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-144759</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutlem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-144759</guid>
		<description>Great Post&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arfahhusaifah.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;!&lt;/a&gt; Thank You Very Much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post<a href="http://www.arfahhusaifah.com" rel="nofollow">!</a> Thank You Very Much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pressure’s on Reid to Call Vote on Dawn Johnsen &#171; Yuvablog</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-98607</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pressure’s on Reid to Call Vote on Dawn Johnsen &#171; Yuvablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-98607</guid>
		<description>[...] I reported earlier this week, Republicans have stalled Johnsen&#8217;s nomination with their ambivalence about supporting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I reported earlier this week, Republicans have stalled Johnsen&#8217;s nomination with their ambivalence about supporting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pressure’s on Reid to Call Vote on Dawn Johnsen &#124; GSA Schedule Services</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-98562</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pressure’s on Reid to Call Vote on Dawn Johnsen &#124; GSA Schedule Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-98562</guid>
		<description>[...] I reported earlier this week, Republicans have stalled Johnsen&#8217;s nomination with their ambivalence about supporting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I reported earlier this week, Republicans have stalled Johnsen&#8217;s nomination with their ambivalence about supporting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KobukAlaska</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-134177</link>
		<dc:creator>KobukAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-134177</guid>
		<description>It is time for a public debate on the meaning of a &quot;loyal opposition&quot; in light of the GOP&#039;s tactics to prevent the current administration from moving forward on the many critical issues facing this nation. As stated recently by one of their leaders, the GOP defines democrats as &quot;the enemy&quot; and their stated goal is to prevent any and all successful democratic programs in order to regain control of congress and ultimately the White House. I do hope that all citizens of good will remember their traitorous stance for a long time to come. It is not enough that their party destroyed the world economy and thrust us into unending war. They want another chance to finish the job. It&#039;s time the voters finish them and send them into the political wilderness, where they belong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time for a public debate on the meaning of a &#8220;loyal opposition&#8221; in light of the GOP&#39;s tactics to prevent the current administration from moving forward on the many critical issues facing this nation. As stated recently by one of their leaders, the GOP defines democrats as &#8220;the enemy&#8221; and their stated goal is to prevent any and all successful democratic programs in order to regain control of congress and ultimately the White House. I do hope that all citizens of good will remember their traitorous stance for a long time to come. It is not enough that their party destroyed the world economy and thrust us into unending war. They want another chance to finish the job. It&#39;s time the voters finish them and send them into the political wilderness, where they belong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KobukAlaska</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-96492</link>
		<dc:creator>KobukAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-96492</guid>
		<description>It is time for a public debate on the meaning of a &quot;loyal opposition&quot; in light of the GOP&#039;s tactics to prevent the current administration from moving forward on the many critical issues facing this nation. As stated recently by one of their leaders, the GOP defines democrats as &quot;the enemy&quot; and their stated goal is to prevent any and all successful democratic programs in order to regain control of congress and ultimately the White House. I do hope that all citizens of good will remember their traitorous stance for a long time to come. It is not enough that their party destroyed the world economy and thrust us into unending war. They want another chance to finish the job. It&#039;s time the voters finish them and send them into the political wilderness, where they belong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time for a public debate on the meaning of a &#8220;loyal opposition&#8221; in light of the GOP&#39;s tactics to prevent the current administration from moving forward on the many critical issues facing this nation. As stated recently by one of their leaders, the GOP defines democrats as &#8220;the enemy&#8221; and their stated goal is to prevent any and all successful democratic programs in order to regain control of congress and ultimately the White House. I do hope that all citizens of good will remember their traitorous stance for a long time to come. It is not enough that their party destroyed the world economy and thrust us into unending war. They want another chance to finish the job. It&#39;s time the voters finish them and send them into the political wilderness, where they belong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-96104</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-96104</guid>
		<description>There is no &quot;University of Indiana.&quot; It&#039;s &quot;Indiana University&quot; as any semi-well educated person should know. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The GOP&#039;s failure to give Dawn Johnsen an up or down vote is disgraceful. The president deserves this appointment and the nonsense about the footnote analogy on abortion and slavery is a cover for their real reason to oppose her: She had the gall to say that waterboarding is torture, which is evident to anyone remotely familiar with the history of waterboarding and the Geneva Convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no &#8220;University of Indiana.&#8221; It&#39;s &#8220;Indiana University&#8221; as any semi-well educated person should know. </p>
<p>The GOP&#39;s failure to give Dawn Johnsen an up or down vote is disgraceful. The president deserves this appointment and the nonsense about the footnote analogy on abortion and slavery is a cover for their real reason to oppose her: She had the gall to say that waterboarding is torture, which is evident to anyone remotely familiar with the history of waterboarding and the Geneva Convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uponfurtherreview</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-96097</link>
		<dc:creator>uponfurtherreview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-96097</guid>
		<description>This is hilarious. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Liberals call Republicans &quot;ruthless tribalists&quot; for refusing to be yes-men to the Democratic Party&#039;s agenda ... but amazingly, the same disparaging tag is never applied to Democrats who similarly stand in unison against Republican issues, such as the amendment requiring citizenship checks in the health care bill. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These critics have no tolerance for any viewpoint that doesn&#039;t march in lockstep with their own. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And why shouldn&#039;t Johnsen have to answer for what she wrote 20 years ago? Haven&#039;t Democrats held Bob McDonnell&#039;s feet to the fire for a thesis he wrote in 1989?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the Obama administration has shown us, &quot;freedom of speech&quot; is defined as &quot;the freedom to agree with our point of view.&quot; Right, Humana?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious. </p>
<p>Liberals call Republicans &#8220;ruthless tribalists&#8221; for refusing to be yes-men to the Democratic Party&#39;s agenda &#8230; but amazingly, the same disparaging tag is never applied to Democrats who similarly stand in unison against Republican issues, such as the amendment requiring citizenship checks in the health care bill. </p>
<p>These critics have no tolerance for any viewpoint that doesn&#39;t march in lockstep with their own. </p>
<p>And why shouldn&#39;t Johnsen have to answer for what she wrote 20 years ago? Haven&#39;t Democrats held Bob McDonnell&#39;s feet to the fire for a thesis he wrote in 1989?</p>
<p>As the Obama administration has shown us, &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; is defined as &#8220;the freedom to agree with our point of view.&#8221; Right, Humana?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up or down vote? Yeah right. The opposition to Dawn Johnsen continues &#124; Yuvablog</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-95891</link>
		<dc:creator>Up or down vote? Yeah right. The opposition to Dawn Johnsen continues &#124; Yuvablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-95891</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothing has changed: Seven months after her nomination was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee, she still hasn’t gotten an up or down vote from the full Senate. Yet she’s been nominated for a critical position in the Justice Department — the senior lawyer to advise the president on the legality of his administration’s policies. Johnsen’s supporters are irate. When asked, Republican senators refuse to say where they stand on Johnsen, whether they would support a vote on her nomination, or if they plan to fillibuster. [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothing has changed: Seven months after her nomination was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee, she still hasn’t gotten an up or down vote from the full Senate. Yet she’s been nominated for a critical position in the Justice Department — the senior lawyer to advise the president on the legality of his administration’s policies. Johnsen’s supporters are irate. When asked, Republican senators refuse to say where they stand on Johnsen, whether they would support a vote on her nomination, or if they plan to fillibuster. [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up or down vote? Yeah right. The opposition to Dawn Johnsen continues &#171; Yuvablog</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/65031/johnsen-opposition-mum-on-possible-filibuster/comment-page-1#comment-95888</link>
		<dc:creator>Up or down vote? Yeah right. The opposition to Dawn Johnsen continues &#171; Yuvablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=65031#comment-95888</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothing has changed: Seven months after her nomination was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee, she still hasn’t gotten an up or down vote from the full Senate. Yet she’s been nominated for a critical position in the Justice Department — the senior lawyer to advise the president on the legality of his administration’s policies. Johnsen’s supporters are irate. When asked, Republican senators refuse to say where they stand on Johnsen, whether they would support a vote on her nomination, or if they plan to fillibuster. [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothing has changed: Seven months after her nomination was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee, she still hasn’t gotten an up or down vote from the full Senate. Yet she’s been nominated for a critical position in the Justice Department — the senior lawyer to advise the president on the legality of his administration’s policies. Johnsen’s supporters are irate. When asked, Republican senators refuse to say where they stand on Johnsen, whether they would support a vote on her nomination, or if they plan to fillibuster. [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

