Rockefeller vs. Trigger
Friday, October 23, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Not the horse.
Here’s the statement from Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee’s health subpanel, reacting to reports that the White House is leaning toward a trigger in lieu of a strong public option in the Democrats’ health reform legislation:
Historically, ‘trigger’ mechanisms have not been successful, and they are not a substitute for a strong public health insurance option. A ‘trigger’ simply delays price competition, which in turn will delay affordability for consumers and moves us farther away from the goals of health care reform. Already, we are seeing insurance companies threatening to game the system, by raising their prices in advance of reform. The only way to curb price-gouging by health insurance companies is with real competition on day one—that is the public option.
Any questions?
4 Comments
Pingback posted October 23, 2009 @ 4:55 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WashIndependent, TMC Member Feed. TMC Member Feed said: Wash. Independent: Rockefeller vs. Trigger: Not the horse. Here’s the statement from Se.. http://bit.ly/xe4Ob [...]
Comment posted October 23, 2009 @ 9:07 pm
Exactly how much worse does it need to get before they can be forced to do the right thing?
Comment posted October 23, 2009 @ 9:26 pm
Whats he talking about? The trigger worked great for the credit card companies. It gave them plenty of time to jack up rates before the regulations kicked in. The only party that got screwed was the people, as usual.
Comment posted October 25, 2009 @ 8:18 am
Triggers are for the very people they are supposed to contain. Always have been. Always will be.
Notice all the water being slung around in the last few weeks? The bill may end up being the healthcare insurance industry's best friend. Campaign finance reform, anyone?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss