<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Scarborough Bets on Cheney, Loses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chslop</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-133794</link>
		<dc:creator>chslop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-133794</guid>
		<description>You can tell who the left (or the right, for that matter) fear the most just by watching who they choose to demonize.  If Palin and Bachman and &quot;Faux&quot; news are so unworthy of serious consideration, why are they so front-and-center on the minds of the Kos, Huffpo, MSNBC, NY Times?   I don&#039;t know what the story is or will be for Palin, but her list of enemies tells me she&#039;s got something going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell who the left (or the right, for that matter) fear the most just by watching who they choose to demonize.  If Palin and Bachman and &#8220;Faux&#8221; news are so unworthy of serious consideration, why are they so front-and-center on the minds of the Kos, Huffpo, MSNBC, NY Times?   I don&#39;t know what the story is or will be for Palin, but her list of enemies tells me she&#39;s got something going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chslop</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-100738</link>
		<dc:creator>chslop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-100738</guid>
		<description>You can tell who the left (or the right, for that matter) fear the most just by watching who they choose to demonize.  If Palin and Bachman and &quot;Faux&quot; news are so unworthy of serious consideration, why are they so front-and-center on the minds of the Kos, Huffpo, MSNBC, NY Times?   I don&#039;t know what the story is or will be for Palin, but her list of enemies tells me she&#039;s got something going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell who the left (or the right, for that matter) fear the most just by watching who they choose to demonize.  If Palin and Bachman and &#8220;Faux&#8221; news are so unworthy of serious consideration, why are they so front-and-center on the minds of the Kos, Huffpo, MSNBC, NY Times?   I don&#39;t know what the story is or will be for Palin, but her list of enemies tells me she&#39;s got something going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hshaw</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-99161</link>
		<dc:creator>hshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-99161</guid>
		<description>Joe ( Chuck ) Scarborough is a saner version of Glen Beck.&lt;br&gt;To watch him on TV you must slant your head to the right.&lt;br&gt;Not one show can end without him saying something about&lt;br&gt;his &quot;when I was in office&quot; crap.  He defends the GOP and has on many &quot;puppets&quot; as guests that agree with his views. I am sure he &lt;br&gt;can find a home on &quot;Faux&quot; news, which is much better suited to him.&lt;br&gt;He is such a phony he doesn&#039;t even use his real name.He&#039;s no Joe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe ( Chuck ) Scarborough is a saner version of Glen Beck.<br />To watch him on TV you must slant your head to the right.<br />Not one show can end without him saying something about<br />his &#8220;when I was in office&#8221; crap.  He defends the GOP and has on many &#8220;puppets&#8221; as guests that agree with his views. I am sure he <br />can find a home on &#8220;Faux&#8221; news, which is much better suited to him.<br />He is such a phony he doesn&#39;t even use his real name.He&#39;s no Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jelperman</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-95322</link>
		<dc:creator>Jelperman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-95322</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take Scarborough seriously the day he explains how one of his interns turned up dead in his office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll take Scarborough seriously the day he explains how one of his interns turned up dead in his office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boots</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-94548</link>
		<dc:creator>boots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-94548</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the strangest thing:  I&#039;m seeing and hearing more from Dick Cheney now than when he was Vice President --- apparently hiding under his desk in some secret bunker.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are those who buy into his revisionist BS.  But unfortunately, the circumstances --- the lies and deceptions --- are too fresh in our minds to be obscured by a rewriting of the worst administration in recent history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dubya, while being incompetent, would be a fun guy to hang out with.  Watch a football game and have a beer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the otherhand, Cheney is vile and evil.  Yet, those who have ears, but refuse to hear the truth, and eyes, but refuse to see, buy into his BS.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it really doesn&#039;t matter.  The Republicans are rutterless and destined to reside on the margins as they look to Cheney, Hannity, Beck, Coulter and Limbaugh for direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s the strangest thing:  I&#39;m seeing and hearing more from Dick Cheney now than when he was Vice President &#8212; apparently hiding under his desk in some secret bunker.</p>
<p>There are those who buy into his revisionist BS.  But unfortunately, the circumstances &#8212; the lies and deceptions &#8212; are too fresh in our minds to be obscured by a rewriting of the worst administration in recent history.</p>
<p>Dubya, while being incompetent, would be a fun guy to hang out with.  Watch a football game and have a beer.</p>
<p>On the otherhand, Cheney is vile and evil.  Yet, those who have ears, but refuse to hear the truth, and eyes, but refuse to see, buy into his BS.  </p>
<p>But it really doesn&#39;t matter.  The Republicans are rutterless and destined to reside on the margins as they look to Cheney, Hannity, Beck, Coulter and Limbaugh for direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dink Singer</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-94199</link>
		<dc:creator>Dink Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-94199</guid>
		<description>Actually if you look at the NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll from June it comes out tied at net -22.  Pelosi in June was 24% positive 46% negative.  The net -17 figure is from September.  If you give any weight to the Very/Somewhat scores Pelosi had a lower approval rating, since her Very Positive score was 5% compared to Cheney&#039;s 10% and her Very Negative score was 34% compared to his 30%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually if you look at the NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll from June it comes out tied at net -22.  Pelosi in June was 24% positive 46% negative.  The net -17 figure is from September.  If you give any weight to the Very/Somewhat scores Pelosi had a lower approval rating, since her Very Positive score was 5% compared to Cheney&#39;s 10% and her Very Negative score was 34% compared to his 30%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Cheney&#8217;s Job Approval Rating: Why Does Anyone Care? &#124; Obama Biden White House</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-94163</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Cheney&#8217;s Job Approval Rating: Why Does Anyone Care? &#124; Obama Biden White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-94163</guid>
		<description>[...] The Washington Independent&#8217;s Dave Weigel dug into one of the day&#8217;s hot Twitter spats (&#8221;Spatter?), between Salon&#8217;s Glenn [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Washington Independent&#8217;s Dave Weigel dug into one of the day&#8217;s hot Twitter spats (&#8221;Spatter?), between Salon&#8217;s Glenn [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Cheney&#8217;s Job Approval Rating: Why Does Anyone Care? &#8211; MR PC EASY</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-94146</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Cheney&#8217;s Job Approval Rating: Why Does Anyone Care? &#8211; MR PC EASY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-94146</guid>
		<description>[...] The Washington Independent&#8217;s Dave Weigel dug into one of the day&#8217;s hot Twitter spats (&#8221;Spatter?), between Salon&#8217;s Glenn [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Washington Independent&#8217;s Dave Weigel dug into one of the day&#8217;s hot Twitter spats (&#8221;Spatter?), between Salon&#8217;s Glenn [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MilesTougeaux</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-93744</link>
		<dc:creator>MilesTougeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-93744</guid>
		<description>Palin isnt hated so much as seen a bad joke. I think in another 6 months more will feel sorry for her than actually hate her. Shes a Liz Dole with a c-average and only a 1 page resume.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bachman is just a figment of Faux News. She really doesnt do much. Shes basically a Coulter or a Malkin with a lower IQ and a congressional office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin isnt hated so much as seen a bad joke. I think in another 6 months more will feel sorry for her than actually hate her. Shes a Liz Dole with a c-average and only a 1 page resume.</p>
<p>Bachman is just a figment of Faux News. She really doesnt do much. Shes basically a Coulter or a Malkin with a lower IQ and a congressional office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonnie</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/comment-page-1#comment-93739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839#comment-93739</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re probably correct that Rahl isn&#039;t representative, at least I&#039;d like to believe that&#039;s true.  So, how about Sarah Palin?  I&#039;d estimate she&#039;s hated by Liberals more than Pelosi is hated by Conservatives.  Add Michelle Bachman to the list too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re probably correct that Rahl isn&#39;t representative, at least I&#39;d like to believe that&#39;s true.  So, how about Sarah Palin?  I&#39;d estimate she&#39;s hated by Liberals more than Pelosi is hated by Conservatives.  Add Michelle Bachman to the list too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

