<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Fewer Americans Believe in Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zplonk</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-149513</link>
		<dc:creator>zplonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-149513</guid>
		<description>Wait, on your &quot;LIST&quot;, which you could have made up entirely, it&#039;s Wikipedia, after all, are only about 40  - 50 people, who are probably very BAD scientists, if that. For these 40-50 &quot;scientists&quot;, I can produce literally thousands of scientists who do NOT believe in Global Climate Destabilisation, because it&#039;s not an article of faith, but who think that science behind this is good and sound and PROVEN.&lt;br&gt;All you can give me is a bunch of hacks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richard Lindzen: Booted out of MIT for falsification of records&lt;br&gt;George V. Chilingar: misappropation of funds and in general, a lackey of Big Oil.&lt;br&gt;Tad Murty, oceanographer: scandal with an underage student.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And so on, and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, on your &#8220;LIST&#8221;, which you could have made up entirely, it&#39;s Wikipedia, after all, are only about 40  &#8211; 50 people, who are probably very BAD scientists, if that. For these 40-50 &#8220;scientists&#8221;, I can produce literally thousands of scientists who do NOT believe in Global Climate Destabilisation, because it&#39;s not an article of faith, but who think that science behind this is good and sound and PROVEN.<br />All you can give me is a bunch of hacks.</p>
<p>Richard Lindzen: Booted out of MIT for falsification of records<br />George V. Chilingar: misappropation of funds and in general, a lackey of Big Oil.<br />Tad Murty, oceanographer: scandal with an underage student.</p>
<p>And so on, and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlin</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-149016</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-149016</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are calling these people hillbillies? There are hundreds of thousands that argue that climate change, changed from &quot;global warming&quot; is noting but a geo-political movement. Copenhagen was an attempt at global government, payable to world bankers who want to tax every human on earth. It is well documents, and the proof is there as world leaders are screaming from the rooftops that &quot;it&#039;s gonna kill everyone if you don&#039;t let us tax and control you&quot; while they own 15 5 k sq ft houses and consume more than 100 average Americans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a blind fool you are. How pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists&#8230;</a><br />You are calling these people hillbillies? There are hundreds of thousands that argue that climate change, changed from &#8220;global warming&#8221; is noting but a geo-political movement. Copenhagen was an attempt at global government, payable to world bankers who want to tax every human on earth. It is well documents, and the proof is there as world leaders are screaming from the rooftops that &#8220;it&#39;s gonna kill everyone if you don&#39;t let us tax and control you&#8221; while they own 15 5 k sq ft houses and consume more than 100 average Americans.</p>
<p>What a blind fool you are. How pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwngator</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-134995</link>
		<dc:creator>jwngator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-134995</guid>
		<description>Who is selling snake oil?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The facts are plain and simple:&lt;br&gt;1) The earth is cooling and has been for nearly a decade&lt;br&gt;2) Global warming theory is not coming from the scientific community - it&#039;s driven by political bodies&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From where I&#039;m standing, Global Warming supporters are the &quot;dumb&quot; ones - they just want to believe it SOOO badly that their ears are impervious to evidence (as is apparently the Global Warming theory, oh sorry, Climate Change.)  Now that&#039;s very convenient...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is selling snake oil?</p>
<p>The facts are plain and simple:<br />1) The earth is cooling and has been for nearly a decade<br />2) Global warming theory is not coming from the scientific community &#8211; it&#39;s driven by political bodies</p>
<p>From where I&#39;m standing, Global Warming supporters are the &#8220;dumb&#8221; ones &#8211; they just want to believe it SOOO badly that their ears are impervious to evidence (as is apparently the Global Warming theory, oh sorry, Climate Change.)  Now that&#39;s very convenient&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwngator</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-105148</link>
		<dc:creator>jwngator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-105148</guid>
		<description>Who is selling snake oil?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The facts are plain and simple:&lt;br&gt;1) The earth is cooling and has been for nearly a decade&lt;br&gt;2) Global warming theory is not coming from the scientific community - it&#039;s driven by political bodies&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From where I&#039;m standing, Global Warming supporters are the &quot;dumb&quot; ones - they just want to believe it SOOO badly that their ears are impervious to evidence (as is apparently the Global Warming theory, oh sorry, Climate Change.)  Now that&#039;s very convenient...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is selling snake oil?</p>
<p>The facts are plain and simple:<br />1) The earth is cooling and has been for nearly a decade<br />2) Global warming theory is not coming from the scientific community &#8211; it&#39;s driven by political bodies</p>
<p>From where I&#39;m standing, Global Warming supporters are the &#8220;dumb&#8221; ones &#8211; they just want to believe it SOOO badly that their ears are impervious to evidence (as is apparently the Global Warming theory, oh sorry, Climate Change.)  Now that&#39;s very convenient&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zplonk</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-94986</link>
		<dc:creator>zplonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-94986</guid>
		<description>LOL, is there a youtube on him saying that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, is there a youtube on him saying that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zplonk</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-94985</link>
		<dc:creator>zplonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-94985</guid>
		<description>Wait, when has the general American public been right about anything scientific? When did the OPINIION  of 1000 undereducated hillbillies been a SCIENTIFIC argument? Only when Imhofe is the audience.&lt;br&gt;Joe sixpack is as dumb as shit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just shows the skeptics have better marketing skills, are better con-men, snake oil sellers. Nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, when has the general American public been right about anything scientific? When did the OPINIION  of 1000 undereducated hillbillies been a SCIENTIFIC argument? Only when Imhofe is the audience.<br />Joe sixpack is as dumb as shit.</p>
<p>Just shows the skeptics have better marketing skills, are better con-men, snake oil sellers. Nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisjay</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-94234</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-94234</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a big pool of credulous rubes, and there are othersw who are begging to be convinced that anything the scientific community says is debateable. There are indeed 2 sides to the &#039;round earth&#039; theory, so let&#039;s not be so hasty here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s a big pool of credulous rubes, and there are othersw who are begging to be convinced that anything the scientific community says is debateable. There are indeed 2 sides to the &#39;round earth&#39; theory, so let&#39;s not be so hasty here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Stop Cap and Trade as of October 23, 2009</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-94064</link>
		<dc:creator>COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Stop Cap and Trade as of October 23, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-94064</guid>
		<description>[...] pro-abortion, pro-Card Check radical Republican.  STAY UP TO DATE ON NY-23 AT DUMPDEDE.COM.   Poll: Fewer Americans Believe in Global Warming - washingtonindependent.com 10/22/2009 Fantastic news for conservatives and libertarians who’ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pro-abortion, pro-Card Check radical Republican.  STAY UP TO DATE ON NY-23 AT DUMPDEDE.COM.   Poll: Fewer Americans Believe in Global Warming &#8211; washingtonindependent.com 10/22/2009 Fantastic news for conservatives and libertarians who’ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSR0601</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-93887</link>
		<dc:creator>HSR0601</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-93887</guid>
		<description>Set apart the climate change as manifested in unpredictable seasons, drying up water sources, prolonged droughts and devastating floods, ice-melting and more, just to think of the sky in Beijing, human-made climate change might need no further evidence. Polluting toxic chemicals is comparable to the smoking habit that is detrimental to human health. And the numerous intractable diseases are almost certainly due to the toxic chemicals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Breathing toxic chemicals in the outdoor air exposes all Americans to a lifetime cancer risk at least 10 times greater than the level considered acceptable under federal law, shows  data released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Beyond, provided the average temperature is getting higher, accordingly all forms of germs, bacterias, viruses, and influenza etc are more likely to multiply. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Some skeptics say the warning against hazards of climate change is overstated, but judging from more frequent and widespread outbreaks of e. coli, salmonella, and bird, swine flu cases endangering human lives and economic recovery seriously, some prompt measures need to be taken, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set apart the climate change as manifested in unpredictable seasons, drying up water sources, prolonged droughts and devastating floods, ice-melting and more, just to think of the sky in Beijing, human-made climate change might need no further evidence. Polluting toxic chemicals is comparable to the smoking habit that is detrimental to human health. And the numerous intractable diseases are almost certainly due to the toxic chemicals.</p>
<p> Breathing toxic chemicals in the outdoor air exposes all Americans to a lifetime cancer risk at least 10 times greater than the level considered acceptable under federal law, shows  data released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.</p>
<p>Beyond, provided the average temperature is getting higher, accordingly all forms of germs, bacterias, viruses, and influenza etc are more likely to multiply. </p>
<p>Some skeptics say the warning against hazards of climate change is overstated, but judging from more frequent and widespread outbreaks of e. coli, salmonella, and bird, swine flu cases endangering human lives and economic recovery seriously, some prompt measures need to be taken, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64782/poll-fewer-americans-believe-in-global-warming/comment-page-1#comment-93918</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64782#comment-93918</guid>
		<description>[...] Not a good sign for the climate bill: New poll shows a precipitous drop in the share of Americans who believe there is &quot;solid evidence&quot; of global warming (Wash. Indy) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not a good sign for the climate bill: New poll shows a precipitous drop in the share of Americans who believe there is &quot;solid evidence&quot; of global warming (Wash. Indy) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

