<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Dems Cave on Telecom Immunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/642/senate-dems-cave-on-telecom-immunity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/642/senate-dems-cave-on-telecom-immunity</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: labdancer</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/642/senate-dems-cave-on-telecom-immunity/comment-page-1#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>labdancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=642#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Spence...okay &quot;Atta K man&quot;- Good piece for the unsaturate- no insult intended. I&#039;d email it to Senator Bond but the &#039;Artless Dodger is only going to ensure it never gets that far. How y&#039;all doing, Big Dick- you crazed maniac.

wainiha- Ooo- I might see about changing that blog handle- which with former Senator Gramm R-BI wanting to out all the American Whinos &amp; all.

FWIW- IAAL- &amp; you have the general drift &amp; math correct. Congress &amp; the President have no more authority to overrule the 4th Amendment without complying with clear provisions in the Constitution on how it might be amended- than the President- or any other felon for that matter- has to overrule the 4th Amendment &amp; the FISA 1978 [RIP].

The trick for the good folks at ACLU &amp; EFF will be to get around any objections to standing to sue. Mind you- by the time that comes up President Obama will have been sworn into [whatever may be left behind &amp; standing of that] office &amp; hopefully will have recovered his bearings from this High &amp; Silly Season- &amp; AG Edwards or whoever may decline to advance such an objection- along with others like the lawsuit of Joseph &amp; Valerie Plame against The &#039;Artless Dodger [a.k.a. Big Dick a.k.a.TCM a.k.a. Shooter a.k.a. Angler a.k.a. Draftee Numbers [redacted redacted redacted redacted redacted] a.k.a. RiCHARD de CHENEY ...et al.

&amp; Senators Obama &amp; Whitehouse being so sincere &amp; accommodating I&#039;d expect them to pony up their share of the court award of damages- which- incidentally- would appear to qualify for trebling under RICO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spence&#8230;okay &#8220;Atta K man&#8221;- Good piece for the unsaturate- no insult intended. I&#8217;d email it to Senator Bond but the &#8216;Artless Dodger is only going to ensure it never gets that far. How y&#8217;all doing, Big Dick- you crazed maniac.</p>
<p>wainiha- Ooo- I might see about changing that blog handle- which with former Senator Gramm R-BI wanting to out all the American Whinos &#038; all.</p>
<p>FWIW- IAAL- &#038; you have the general drift &#038; math correct. Congress &#038; the President have no more authority to overrule the 4th Amendment without complying with clear provisions in the Constitution on how it might be amended- than the President- or any other felon for that matter- has to overrule the 4th Amendment &#038; the FISA 1978 [RIP].</p>
<p>The trick for the good folks at ACLU &#038; EFF will be to get around any objections to standing to sue. Mind you- by the time that comes up President Obama will have been sworn into [whatever may be left behind &#038; standing of that] office &#038; hopefully will have recovered his bearings from this High &#038; Silly Season- &#038; AG Edwards or whoever may decline to advance such an objection- along with others like the lawsuit of Joseph &#038; Valerie Plame against The &#8216;Artless Dodger [a.k.a. Big Dick a.k.a.TCM a.k.a. Shooter a.k.a. Angler a.k.a. Draftee Numbers [redacted redacted redacted redacted redacted] a.k.a. RiCHARD de CHENEY &#8230;et al.</p>
<p>&#038; Senators Obama &#038; Whitehouse being so sincere &#038; accommodating I&#8217;d expect them to pony up their share of the court award of damages- which- incidentally- would appear to qualify for trebling under RICO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wainiha</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/642/senate-dems-cave-on-telecom-immunity/comment-page-1#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>wainiha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=642#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Thank Goodness for the ACLU.

What good is a Congress that&#039;s afraid to make any decisions that go against the &quot;Political Considerations First&quot; or the &quot;Fear is the First Consideration&quot; criteria?

I vote for a legal penalty for breaking one&#039;s oath of office.  If you swear to uphold the Constitution etc. then you must do it.

Also not being a lawyer...We must have two thirds of the States Ratifiy an Constitutional  Amendment how can we simply pass a law by Congressional majority that makes it moot?  How can Congress pass a law and the President sign it if that law voilates a Constitutional Amendment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Goodness for the ACLU.</p>
<p>What good is a Congress that&#8217;s afraid to make any decisions that go against the &#8220;Political Considerations First&#8221; or the &#8220;Fear is the First Consideration&#8221; criteria?</p>
<p>I vote for a legal penalty for breaking one&#8217;s oath of office.  If you swear to uphold the Constitution etc. then you must do it.</p>
<p>Also not being a lawyer&#8230;We must have two thirds of the States Ratifiy an Constitutional  Amendment how can we simply pass a law by Congressional majority that makes it moot?  How can Congress pass a law and the President sign it if that law voilates a Constitutional Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

