A Senate Bill to End Cocaine Sentencing Disparity
Thursday, October 15, 2009 at 1:44 pm
A group of 10 Democratic senators today reintroduced legislation designed to end the sentencing disparity between powder and crack cocaine — a long-standing push that never quite seems to get enacted.
In a statement, the lawmakers cite the reasoning behind the proposal.
Under current law, possession of five grams of crack cocaine (roughly the weight of two sugar cubes) triggers a mandatory minimum five-year prison sentence, while trafficking 500 grams (approximately one pound) of powder cocaine triggers the same sentence. The so-called 100:1 sentencing disparity has been in place since 1986. The Fair Sentencing Act would eliminate the disparity, treating crack and powder cocaine equally.
Sen. Richard Durbin (Ill.), the upper chamber’s second-ranking Democrat, said passage of the bill is long overdue.
The sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine has contributed to the imprisonment of African Americans at six times the rate of whites and to the United States’ position as the world’s leader in incarcerations. Congress has talked about addressing this injustice for long enough; it’s time for us to act.
Other sponsors of the bill include Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy (Vt.), Arlen Specter (Pa.), Chris Dodd (Conn.), John Kerry (Mass.), Al Franken (Minn.), Ted Kaufman (Del.), Russ Feingold (Wis.), Ben Cardin (Md.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.).
In July, the House Judiciary Committee advanced a similar bill, sponsored by Rep. Robert Scott (D-Va.).
5 Comments
Comment posted October 15, 2009 @ 7:48 pm
It's not clear from this post what “treating crack and powder cocaine equally” actually means.
Would the bill in question reduce sentences for crack possession, or increase sentences for powdered cocaine possession? If the latter, then it seems like passage of the bill would serve to increase the number of people incarcerated.
Comment posted October 16, 2009 @ 2:10 am
time to stop weighing LSD carrier mediums too!
Comment posted October 16, 2009 @ 3:19 am
I think that most advocates of parity in cocaine sentencing assume that penalties for crack would reduced to those for powder. But why not go in the other direction? I'd kind of lke to see tht happen.
Comment posted August 30, 2010 @ 4:50 pm
No doubt, the carrier weight prosecution is asenine, @ best!
Comment posted August 30, 2010 @ 4:52 pm
2 my mind, it would mean that crack sentancing would be done like powder, because lord knows nobody wants 2 increase the number of people in jail. @ least nobody sane…
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss