More on the Congressional Move to Amend FOIA, Hide Torture Photos

By
Thursday, October 15, 2009 at 1:56 pm

To follow up on my earlier post about Rep. Louis Slaughter (D-N.Y.) and her speech on her colleagues’ move to amend the Freedom of Information Act to prevent the release of photographs depicting abuse of detainees in U.S. custody, it’s worth looking at the conference report on the bill. The bill is called the “Protected National Security Documents Act of 2009,” but refers not to any “documents” per se, but only to any “photograph” taken between Sept. 11, 2001 and Jan. 22, 2009, that “relates to the treatment of individuals engaged, captured, or detained after September 11, 2001, by the Armed Forces of the United States in operations outside of the United States.”

The provision was proposed by Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Ct.), as Steven Aftergood of Secrecy News explains, specifically “to thwart a successful FOIA lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union” which wants the government to turn over photos documenting abuse of detainees in U.S. military custody.  I wrote about the bill and its progress last week here. Although a federal appeals court ruled last year that the government must produce those unclassified photos under the Freedom of Information Act, the government has refused, and filed a petition to the Supreme Court for review.

The Supreme Court hasn’t yet decided whether it will hear the case, though, and given that Congress may resolve the matter by hiding the unclassified photographs with this legislation, Solicitor General Elena Kagan last week asked the court to put off deciding, since it looks like Congress is prepared to decide the matter — and conceal the photographs — on its own.

“From an open government point of view, it is dismaying that Congress would intervene to alter the outcome of an ongoing Freedom of Information Act proceeding,” writes Aftergood in his blog, which has done a terrific job of exposing the government’s efforts to hide what’s supposed to be public information. Aftergood adds that the move reveals Congress doesn’t have much confidence in its own Freedom of Information Act, the federal courts interpreting it, or the principles behind it, if it feels the need to exempt this specific set of photos from the law’s purview.

On the other hand, he notes that it could be worse: the Supreme Court could have taken the case and upheld the Obama administration’s right to exempt the photos “simply because they may pose an unspecified danger to unspecified persons.” “Such a Supreme Court ruling would have left a gaping hole in the Freedom of Information Act even larger than what the Obama Administration and Congress have now created,” writes Aftergood.

Or, of course, the Supreme Court might have just done its job, and recognized, as the two lower courts who’ve heard this case did, that unclassified documents can’t be concealed based simply on the executive’s fear that exposing government wrongdoing will incite anger at the United States and endanger national security. After all, if preventing anger at the United States were a legitimate reason to conceal unclassified information about the government, then there would be considerably less Information left for the Act to protect.

Comments

7 Comments

Tweets that mention More on the Congressional Move to Amend FOIA, Hide Torture Photos « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted October 15, 2009 @ 4:49 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NatlSecurityArchive, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: More on the Congressional Move to Amend FOIA, Hide Torture Photos http://bit.ly/44cj8M [...]


Class Relevant News: « Mass Media and American Politics: The Blog
Pingback posted October 15, 2009 @ 10:12 pm

[...] October 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment Today, the House of Representatives passed a bill amending the Freedom of Information Act so as to prevent the release of still unseen photos documenting detainee abuse. Here’s a brief rundown on FOIA and on the move by the House. [...]


Immigration
Comment posted October 19, 2009 @ 5:42 am

Excellent site!This site is extremely informative and has proved to be handy.Thanks for such a wonderful informative and entertaining read. Quotations are a great way to inspire you to perform at your best and to remember sage advice from the smartest minds in the world.
http://immigrationprofessionals.info


Anonymous
Comment posted April 19, 2011 @ 12:50 am

You can also find a wide variety of prom dresses materials and styles, as well as some <a href="http:/You can also find a wide variety of prom dresses materials and styles, as well as some prom dress really great value prices on the prom dresses and quinceanera dresses.
http://www.promdressmart.com/“>prom dress really great value prices on the prom dresses and quinceanera dresses.


Anonymous
Comment posted May 9, 2011 @ 1:07 pm

First off, make certain you realize that real Religion jeansTrue Religion Jeans are very, extremely expensive. There will be the common stitched real Religion jeans, the large T stitched (with thicker stitching), as well as the awesome T stitched (with awesome thick stitching). The awesome T’s are Mens True Religion Jeans one of the most expensive, near to $319 every pair. Your very first clue to or not or not the jeans you need are risk-free to purchase is: PRICE. If they are as well cheap, then odds are they are FAKE. However, this really is not in any way instances the case. I have observed countless fakes getting marketed at extremely considerable prices. So glimpse out! spend thought to details!!
Details such since the Cheap True Religion whether stitching, problem concerning the horseshoes, inside pattern concerning the pockets, rivets, placement concerning the back again logo patch, inseam length, material, inside tags, as well as the belt loops are all methods to inform the distinction in between a genuine pair as well as a Womens True Religion Jeans FAKE pair. I will include every one of those for you.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.