Comments on: Michael Ledeen on Obama’s Nobel Prize

By: texasaggie

texasaggie — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:49:47 +0000

I seem to remember that this same Ledeen (are there more of them?) was involved in preparing the forged letter that claimed that Hussein had imported tons of yellowcake from Niger. Are his thoughts actually of any consequence?

By: Pug

Pug — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:37:05 +0000

Michael Ledeen has the credibility of Bill Kristol. Zero.

By: William Ockham

William Ockham — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:06:52 +0000

Really, Michael Ledeen? You asked Ledeen? Granted, you can count on him to say something really stupid, but you should be ashamed of yourself for taking that idiot seriously.

By: strangely_enough

strangely_enough — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:26:38 +0000

Shouldn't Ledeen be out ginning up a new war so someone else can win the Nobel for stopping/preventing it?
Oddly, the Nobel Committee's “well-known proclivity of awarding the Peace Prize to people who make war more likely,” somehow missed Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Ledeen himself.

By: bimplebean

bimplebean — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:11:17 +0000

What a dick. Carter brokered peace between Israel and Egypt. Anyone see them go to war lately? Of course not. Ledeen has it all wrong.

By: Chamberlain Round Up « Repartay

Chamberlain Round Up « Repartay — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:02:21 +0000

[...] As expected, a number of conservatives have reacted to Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize by highlighting the incontrovertible fact that Barack Obama — far from a missionary of peace — is actually a weak willed appeaser like Neville Chamberlain, and as Michael Ledeen earlier suggested, is making the world a more dangerous place. [...]

By: Turn It Down | The League of Ordinary Gentlemen

Turn It Down | The League of Ordinary Gentlemen — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:47:29 +0000

[...] X: Wow – this award has provoked a bipartisan race to the bottom. Michael Ledeen wastes not time in suggesting that Obama “makes war more likely.” On the other side of the fence, [...]