Civil Libertarians Dismayed by Patriot Amendments

By
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 5:10 pm

I just spoke to Kevin Bankston, the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s senior attorney specializing in free speech and privacy law, about his reaction to today’s Senate Judiciary Committee markup session on the Patriot Act, which resulted in passage of the Leahy-Feinstein bill, with a few amendments. Bankston, who’s been following this debate closely, was not pleased.

“We’re deeply disappointed that the Obama administration sided with the committee Republicans to pass amendments to remove reforms from the already watered-down bill,” he said this afternoon, referring to seven amendments, five of which were introduced by Senator Jeff Sessions (R-S.C.), which removed civil liberties protections and which Sessions said were mostly recommended by the Obama administration’s FBI and Justice Department in closed-door classified briefings.

“We’re very disappointed in the final bill that was voted out of committee,” said Bankston. “It has fewer reforms than the original bill from Sen. Leahy, and it’s a very far cry from Sen. Feingold and Durbin’s JUSTICE Act.” The JUSTICE Act would have required the government to specify more clearly the targets of their investigations and their connections to terrorism, to keep the FBI from using its authority to engage in broad-based data-mining of Americans’ phone, library and business records.

The amendments adopted included removing a requirement that the FBI periodically review its gag orders on National Security Letter recipients, removed judicial review for those gag orders, and watered down an effort to heighten the showing required when the FBI is seeking library records. The text of the final amendments and votes on each is available on the Judiciary Committee’s Website here.

Bankston was also disappointed that the Judiciary Committee refused to consider amendments to the FISA Amendments Act passed last year, which he calls “a much graver threat to civil liberties.” Feingold’s attempt to offer an amendment was withdrawn when Committee Chairman Leahy said he’d oppose it on procedural grounds.

To Bankston, this was all evidence that Congress is far too willing to cave to the wishes of a Democratic administration, even if its proposals are just as bad for the civil liberties of Americans as the Republican administration’s were.

“In 2005, the Judiciary Committee was able to pass much stronger reforms under a Republican administration,” said Bankston. “Now, in a position of power and with a vaunted supermajority, the Democrats are still bargaining against themselves rather than having a united front and introducing new civil liberties protections. I think it’s because of the White House’s position that these powers need to be renewed. There’s an unwillingness to consider even minor reforms.”

The American Civil Liberties Union was similarly disappointed, and Michael Macleod-Ball, Acting Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office, came out with this statement this afternoon:

We are disappointed that further changes were not made to ensure Americans’ civil liberties would be adequately protected by this Patriot Act legislation. This truly was a missed opportun Sity for the Senate Judiciary Committee to right the wrongs of the Patriot Act and stand up for Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights. The meager improvements made during this markup will certainly be overshadowed by allowing so many horrible amendments to be added to an already weak bill. Congress cannot continue to make this mistake with the Patriot Act again and again. We urge the Senate to adopt amendments on the floor that will bring this bill in line with the Constitution.

Comments

17 Comments

Tweets that mention Civil Libertarians Dismayed by Patriot Amendments « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted October 8, 2009 @ 5:40 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMC Member Feed. TMC Member Feed said: Wash. Independent: Civil Libertarians Dismayed by Patriot Amendments: I just spoke to Kevin B.. http://bit.ly/JwIRF [...]


betsym
Comment posted October 8, 2009 @ 9:32 pm

I am also disappointed. Even though I'm an Obama supporter I still don't like the Patriot Act.


Round-Up of Reactions to Yesterday’s PATRIOT Vote | Left to chance
Pingback posted October 9, 2009 @ 4:20 pm

[...] send to the Senate floor a USA PATRIOT Act renewal bill lacking critical civil liberties reforms, EFF’s reaction was much the same as Senator Feingold’s, as he expressed in his post-vote blog post at Daily [...]


Obama the Rock Star vs. Obama the Peacemaker | GSA Schedule Services
Pingback posted October 9, 2009 @ 10:42 pm

[...] the Freedom of Information Act to dismissing torture cases on “state secrets” grounds, encouraging Congress to limit civil liberties protections against broad-based FBI snooping and refusing even to investigate cases where the [...]


H
Comment posted October 10, 2009 @ 6:51 am

Did anyone research Obama before voting for him? (shakes head)


Gavel Grab » Senate Panel Divided on Patriot Provisions
Pingback posted October 11, 2009 @ 8:56 am

[...] The displeasure of civil liberties and privacy advocates was reported by the Washington Independent in an article headlined, “Civil Libertarians Dismayed by Patriot Amendments.“ [...]


waa
Comment posted October 14, 2009 @ 2:53 pm

The USA PATRIOT ACT is unconstitutional and as such ALL members of Congress that voted FOR it must be impeached. Enough of this sideshow already.


darthtater
Comment posted October 23, 2009 @ 5:33 pm

Regardless of political points of view, our Civil Liberties are being eroded by both parties.


jakibaez
Comment posted November 2, 2009 @ 2:34 pm

I like to get in touch with Kevin Bankson, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation–how can I?


jakibaez
Comment posted November 2, 2009 @ 7:34 pm

I like to get in touch with Kevin Bankson, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation–how can I?


artsy mm
Comment posted August 21, 2010 @ 11:31 am

Did anyone research Obama before voting for him? (shakes head)


Rosie Kuntz
Comment posted January 19, 2011 @ 12:33 pm

hi, thank you for this post
careprost


franquicia lyoness
Comment posted June 8, 2011 @ 11:14 pm

thank you for sharing such a great post its really awesome


Apollo
Comment posted June 24, 2011 @ 2:09 pm

The commenter believes that readers can find and use so many valuable information here. Surely I will recommend your site. You really helped me a lot and contributed o my researches. I want to mention how wonderful your work are and its contribution in our society today. I wish to see more in the future. more power

tenant screening


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.