<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Republicans Fall to 25 Percent Approval, Most Americans Back Public Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What About Bob</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option/comment-page-1#comment-92893</link>
		<dc:creator>What About Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62968#comment-92893</guid>
		<description>This article is propaganda!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is propaganda!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option/comment-page-1#comment-85781</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62968#comment-85781</guid>
		<description>The prevailing theory is that Obama won his presidential campaign by successfully mobilizing large groups of people who don&#039;t normally vote to head to the polls.  The 2008 presidential election yielded a mucher higher voter turnout of both black voters and young voters, both demographics that are statistically more likely to vote for a democrat than a republican. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The deviation from the norm on this was immense, really, so it&#039;s a pretty safe prediction that the 2010 election will trend at least a ways back towards the average voting demographics, which would make it very accurately an &quot;older and whiter&quot; election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prevailing theory is that Obama won his presidential campaign by successfully mobilizing large groups of people who don&#39;t normally vote to head to the polls.  The 2008 presidential election yielded a mucher higher voter turnout of both black voters and young voters, both demographics that are statistically more likely to vote for a democrat than a republican. </p>
<p>The deviation from the norm on this was immense, really, so it&#39;s a pretty safe prediction that the 2010 election will trend at least a ways back towards the average voting demographics, which would make it very accurately an &#8220;older and whiter&#8221; election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option/comment-page-1#comment-85768</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62968#comment-85768</guid>
		<description>Charlie Cook is pushing the &quot;older, whiter&quot; thing as is Ron Brownstein.  They&#039;re both very good. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think they base it on the fact that non-Presidential elections are lower turn out and minorities and young people are usually even lower turn out in those elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Cook is pushing the &#8220;older, whiter&#8221; thing as is Ron Brownstein.  They&#39;re both very good. </p>
<p>I think they base it on the fact that non-Presidential elections are lower turn out and minorities and young people are usually even lower turn out in those elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option/comment-page-1#comment-85747</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62968#comment-85747</guid>
		<description>The white voter thing is kind of weird.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s like, here&#039;s what people in general think of the GOP.  Now let&#039;s take out the black people and see what the people think who really matter in 2010.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously you didn&#039;t mean it that way or anything close, but I think this is not a valid way to use racial data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The white voter thing is kind of weird.</p>
<p>It&#39;s like, here&#39;s what people in general think of the GOP.  Now let&#39;s take out the black people and see what the people think who really matter in 2010.</p>
<p>Obviously you didn&#39;t mean it that way or anything close, but I think this is not a valid way to use racial data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannalee</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option/comment-page-1#comment-85681</link>
		<dc:creator>hannalee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62968#comment-85681</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why the 2010 electorate would be &quot;whiter and older.&quot; Likely older, but I thought it was getting browner. Also, you have to believe that the recent success of minority support, particularly from African Americans, would improve turnout among these communities. Hope so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t understand why the 2010 electorate would be &#8220;whiter and older.&#8221; Likely older, but I thought it was getting browner. Also, you have to believe that the recent success of minority support, particularly from African Americans, would improve turnout among these communities. Hope so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Poll: Republicans Fall to 25 Percent Approval, Most Americans Back Public Option « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62968/poll-republicans-fall-to-25-percent-approval-most-americans-back-public-option/comment-page-1#comment-85616</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Poll: Republicans Fall to 25 Percent Approval, Most Americans Back Public Option « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62968#comment-85616</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by daveweigel and TMC Member Feed. TMC Member Feed said: Wash. Independent: Poll: Republicans Fall to 25 Percent Approval, Most Americans Back Public .. http://bit.ly/11K5UM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by daveweigel and TMC Member Feed. TMC Member Feed said: Wash. Independent: Poll: Republicans Fall to 25 Percent Approval, Most Americans Back Public .. <a href="http://bit.ly/11K5UM" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/11K5UM</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

