Comments on: The White House Fires Back on ‘Czars’ http://washingtonindependent.com/62673/the-white-house-fires-back-on-czars National News in Context Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: MARCUS http://washingtonindependent.com/62673/the-white-house-fires-back-on-czars/comment-page-1#comment-88231 MARCUS Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:45:44 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62673#comment-88231 CZAR IS THE TERM USED BY THE IDIOTS WHO CANNONT AND DO NAT KNOW THE FULL NAMES OF THESE DEPT HEADS, <br>THERE ARE ACTUAL DEPTS WITH LONG TITLES BUT THE MEDIA BEIGN DUMB AS YOU CALL THEM CZARS, THE TEA BAGGERS SAY NAZI, AND ALL OF U ARE DUMB AS HELL, FOR NOT KNOWING THESE DEPT EXIST AND HAVE FULL TITLES BUT NO ONE DOES RESEARCH SO THEY CALL THEM CZARS, AND NOW MORE DUMMIES ARE OUTRAGED. CZAR IS THE TERM USED BY THE IDIOTS WHO CANNONT AND DO NAT KNOW THE FULL NAMES OF THESE DEPT HEADS,
THERE ARE ACTUAL DEPTS WITH LONG TITLES BUT THE MEDIA BEIGN DUMB AS YOU CALL THEM CZARS, THE TEA BAGGERS SAY NAZI, AND ALL OF U ARE DUMB AS HELL, FOR NOT KNOWING THESE DEPT EXIST AND HAVE FULL TITLES BUT NO ONE DOES RESEARCH SO THEY CALL THEM CZARS, AND NOW MORE DUMMIES ARE OUTRAGED.

]]> By: lkt http://washingtonindependent.com/62673/the-white-house-fires-back-on-czars/comment-page-1#comment-84997 lkt Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:08:14 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62673#comment-84997 Except George W. Bush, who had 47 compared to the 36 advisors currently in the White House. So what was GW's breeding of "czars" like, loser? Except George W. Bush, who had 47 compared to the 36 advisors currently in the White House. So what was GW's breeding of “czars” like, loser?

]]> By: Doc3 http://washingtonindependent.com/62673/the-white-house-fires-back-on-czars/comment-page-1#comment-84922 Doc3 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:39:41 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62673#comment-84922 All the Congress needs to do is to cut the budget of the White House. I have read somewhere the budget for the White House has grown to two billion dollars per year. Keep in mind it is not the question of having a Czar, it is that Obama has been breeding them like bunnies. No past President has had anywhere near this number. All the Congress needs to do is to cut the budget of the White House. I have read somewhere the budget for the White House has grown to two billion dollars per year. Keep in mind it is not the question of having a Czar, it is that Obama has been breeding them like bunnies. No past President has had anywhere near this number.

]]> By: Jon H http://washingtonindependent.com/62673/the-white-house-fires-back-on-czars/comment-page-1#comment-84812 Jon H Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:36:19 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62673#comment-84812 I think the White House should start referring to the staff members of Congresspeople as 'czars'.<br><br>Senator Snowe's chief of staff is now Snow's Staff Czar. Etc. I think the White House should start referring to the staff members of Congresspeople as 'czars'.

Senator Snowe's chief of staff is now Snow's Staff Czar. Etc.

]]>