<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Washington Post Botches It on Orly Taitz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:22:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oldmagicman666</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-106265</link>
		<dc:creator>oldmagicman666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-106265</guid>
		<description>Alaska Governor Sean Parnell shows the world how to handle Obama. Take a look---&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29467.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29467...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone should handle this usurper this way. When you are not really a President why should you be treated like a POTUS. Give Parnell a big hand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alaska Governor Sean Parnell shows the world how to handle Obama. Take a look&#8212;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29467.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29467.." rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29467..</a>.</p>
<p>Everyone should handle this usurper this way. When you are not really a President why should you be treated like a POTUS. Give Parnell a big hand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-106054</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-106054</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re the only here that thinks people worship the President as a God.  I don&#039;t worship ANY God at all, much less a simple man.  I was able to think and reason long before President Obama came along and will continue to do so free of what he says or does.  You&#039;ve used the word &quot;communist&quot; so much it means nothing to anyone but you.  Give it a rest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are no smoke and mirrors required to uphold the law of the land as it has been applied for the past 220 years.  Our founding fathers felt so strongly about the Natural Born clause, that they wrote the a grandfather clause that allowed themselves to be exempt.  If they wanted the term &quot;Natural Born&quot; to exclude citizens based not only on their birthplace, but the birthplace of BOTH their parents, then they would have written it like that; which they DID NOT.  Your interpretation (ie OPINION) does not make it fact.  How the law has been applied is what I base my judgement upon.  You, on the other hand, only have conjecture and the word &quot;communist&quot; in your severely-lacking arsenal.  Again, no third type of citizenship exists.  Only someone like you and other idiot birthers think otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Woodrow Wilson&#039;s mother was born in England.  Chester Arthur&#039;s father was born in Ireland.  What about them?  By your very flawed logic, they should have never been allowed into office.  Mitt Romney&#039;s dad was born in Mexico.  I never heard anyone question his eligibility to run.  Why not?  Because you are peddling a load of garbage and you know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re the only here that thinks people worship the President as a God.  I don&#39;t worship ANY God at all, much less a simple man.  I was able to think and reason long before President Obama came along and will continue to do so free of what he says or does.  You&#39;ve used the word &#8220;communist&#8221; so much it means nothing to anyone but you.  Give it a rest.</p>
<p>There are no smoke and mirrors required to uphold the law of the land as it has been applied for the past 220 years.  Our founding fathers felt so strongly about the Natural Born clause, that they wrote the a grandfather clause that allowed themselves to be exempt.  If they wanted the term &#8220;Natural Born&#8221; to exclude citizens based not only on their birthplace, but the birthplace of BOTH their parents, then they would have written it like that; which they DID NOT.  Your interpretation (ie OPINION) does not make it fact.  How the law has been applied is what I base my judgement upon.  You, on the other hand, only have conjecture and the word &#8220;communist&#8221; in your severely-lacking arsenal.  Again, no third type of citizenship exists.  Only someone like you and other idiot birthers think otherwise.</p>
<p>President Woodrow Wilson&#39;s mother was born in England.  Chester Arthur&#39;s father was born in Ireland.  What about them?  By your very flawed logic, they should have never been allowed into office.  Mitt Romney&#39;s dad was born in Mexico.  I never heard anyone question his eligibility to run.  Why not?  Because you are peddling a load of garbage and you know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldmagicman666</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105978</link>
		<dc:creator>oldmagicman666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105978</guid>
		<description>Indiana Court of Appeals tries to define Natural Born! Now to the Supreme Court to overturn this tragedy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indiana Court of Appeals tries to define Natural Born! Now to the Supreme Court to overturn this tragedy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldmagicman666</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105963</link>
		<dc:creator>oldmagicman666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105963</guid>
		<description>You continue to throw up the Obot smoke and mirrors and substitute Natural Born Citizen where Citizen was and try to use the 14th amendment which dealt only with citizenship and has nothing to do with Natural Born American Citizens. But you never once stated why the founding fathers wanted the Natural Born Requirement in our great Constitution, and what they intended for it to do, when not a one of them were Natural Born in 1787. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you love America as much as you type you do, why would you want this Great Capitalistic World Leader of a country to fall into Communist hands (that you say you are not one of) and destroy Capitalism and embrace Communism. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Explain what the Natural Born American Citizen requirement was to our Founding Fathers and what they intended to gain from this requirement as they founded our new and great Country. Who was this requirement supposed to exclude, and why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You continue to throw up the Obot smoke and mirrors and substitute Natural Born Citizen where Citizen was and try to use the 14th amendment which dealt only with citizenship and has nothing to do with Natural Born American Citizens. But you never once stated why the founding fathers wanted the Natural Born Requirement in our great Constitution, and what they intended for it to do, when not a one of them were Natural Born in 1787. </p>
<p>If you love America as much as you type you do, why would you want this Great Capitalistic World Leader of a country to fall into Communist hands (that you say you are not one of) and destroy Capitalism and embrace Communism. </p>
<p>Explain what the Natural Born American Citizen requirement was to our Founding Fathers and what they intended to gain from this requirement as they founded our new and great Country. Who was this requirement supposed to exclude, and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105920</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105920</guid>
		<description>You are kidding, right?  First of all, you calling me a Communist, etc. just makes me laugh at your ridiculousness.  It just makes you sound as loony as you are.  I love this country more than you can ever imagine and have no desire to see it pissed on anymore like it was by the previous administration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, I don&#039;t need to lie.  The quotes are there for a reason.  Read these two and keep weeping...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227), declared Miss Elg &quot;to be a natural born citizen of the United States,&quot; and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mandoli v. Acheson, 344 U.S. 133 (1952)&lt;br&gt;Joseph Mandoli was a dual US/Italian citizen by birth (born in the US to Italian parents). He left the US as an infant and moved to Italy with his parents. When he sought to return to the US in 1937, his claim to US citizenship was rejected because he had failed to return promptly to the US upon reaching the age of majority, and also because he had served briefly in the Italian army in 1931. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Supreme Court ruled that the law, as it then stood, did not permit natural-born US citizens to be stripped of US citizenship for failing to return to the US upon reaching adulthood. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The court did not base its ruling in this case on any overarching constitutional arguments. Rather, it examined the legislative history of the portions of US citizenship law, and concluded that Congress had consciously chosen to make these provisions applicable only to naturalized US citizens (see Rogers v. Bellei below). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In particular, the court noted that although US law at that time required certain US citizens with childhood dual citizenship (such as those born abroad to American parents) to make a specific &quot;election&quot; of US citizenship (i.e., a declaration of allegiance followed by a return to the US) upon reaching adulthood, no such requirement applied to a person who had US citizenship on account of having been born in the US. Lower courts had apparently interpreted the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier decision in Perkins v. Elg as imposing such an &quot;election&quot; requirement quite broadly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The court also decided that Mandoli&#039;s foreign military service did not warrant loss of his US citizenship because, under Mussolini&#039;s Fascist government, he really had had no choice but to join the Italian army. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dean Acheson (Dean was his first name, not a title) was Secretary of State during Truman&#039;s second term as President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My worst shot is still better than what you can throw at me any day of the week.  The 14th Amendment of our Constitution states the following:  All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See how there are only two types of citizenship listed and defined?  Born or Naturalized.  That&#039;s it.  There is no third type of citizenship.  Obama is not a Naturalized citizen.  He was born and always has been a natural-born citizen.  Get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are kidding, right?  First of all, you calling me a Communist, etc. just makes me laugh at your ridiculousness.  It just makes you sound as loony as you are.  I love this country more than you can ever imagine and have no desire to see it pissed on anymore like it was by the previous administration.</p>
<p>Second, I don&#39;t need to lie.  The quotes are there for a reason.  Read these two and keep weeping&#8230;</p>
<p>Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227), declared Miss Elg &#8220;to be a natural born citizen of the United States,&#8221; and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants.</p>
<p>Mandoli v. Acheson, 344 U.S. 133 (1952)<br />Joseph Mandoli was a dual US/Italian citizen by birth (born in the US to Italian parents). He left the US as an infant and moved to Italy with his parents. When he sought to return to the US in 1937, his claim to US citizenship was rejected because he had failed to return promptly to the US upon reaching the age of majority, and also because he had served briefly in the Italian army in 1931. </p>
<p>The Supreme Court ruled that the law, as it then stood, did not permit natural-born US citizens to be stripped of US citizenship for failing to return to the US upon reaching adulthood. </p>
<p>The court did not base its ruling in this case on any overarching constitutional arguments. Rather, it examined the legislative history of the portions of US citizenship law, and concluded that Congress had consciously chosen to make these provisions applicable only to naturalized US citizens (see Rogers v. Bellei below). </p>
<p>In particular, the court noted that although US law at that time required certain US citizens with childhood dual citizenship (such as those born abroad to American parents) to make a specific &#8220;election&#8221; of US citizenship (i.e., a declaration of allegiance followed by a return to the US) upon reaching adulthood, no such requirement applied to a person who had US citizenship on account of having been born in the US. Lower courts had apparently interpreted the Supreme Court&#39;s earlier decision in Perkins v. Elg as imposing such an &#8220;election&#8221; requirement quite broadly. </p>
<p>The court also decided that Mandoli&#39;s foreign military service did not warrant loss of his US citizenship because, under Mussolini&#39;s Fascist government, he really had had no choice but to join the Italian army. </p>
<p>Dean Acheson (Dean was his first name, not a title) was Secretary of State during Truman&#39;s second term as President.</p>
<p>My worst shot is still better than what you can throw at me any day of the week.  The 14th Amendment of our Constitution states the following:  All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.  </p>
<p>See how there are only two types of citizenship listed and defined?  Born or Naturalized.  That&#39;s it.  There is no third type of citizenship.  Obama is not a Naturalized citizen.  He was born and always has been a natural-born citizen.  Get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldmagicman666</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105893</link>
		<dc:creator>oldmagicman666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105893</guid>
		<description>So you admit that you are simply trying to hide the truth that your magic Communist foreigner is a usurper and if found out will not be able to get your Communist agenda through the House and Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939): The U.S. Supreme Court concluded that Marie Elizabeth Elg, who was born in the United States of Swedish parents naturalized in the United States, had not lost her birthright U.S. citizenship because of her removal during minority to Sweden and was entitled to all the rights and privileges of that U.S. citizenship. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decree that declared Elg &quot;to be a natural born citizen of the United States.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that was a nice try and might convince a Obot, but the Supreme Court never said Elg was a Natural Born Citizen of the United States. That was an opinion and never was included in the final decision. Why do &quot;you lie&quot;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now wanna play? Why did the founding fathers follow our first Supreme Court Justice&#039;s lead and add the language John Jay wrote to George Washington about, concerning a Commander in Chief should have to be Natural Born? No one was Natural Born back in 1787 and no one would be Natural Born and old enough to become POTUS for over 35 tears. So, what did the founding fathers want to keep out of power? British citizens that had British citizen parents, and allegiance to a foreign power not the United States! That is exactly what we have sleeping in our White House today. What else could the founding fathers in all their wisdom have intended? Come on. hit me with your best shot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you admit that you are simply trying to hide the truth that your magic Communist foreigner is a usurper and if found out will not be able to get your Communist agenda through the House and Senate.</p>
<p>Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939): The U.S. Supreme Court concluded that Marie Elizabeth Elg, who was born in the United States of Swedish parents naturalized in the United States, had not lost her birthright U.S. citizenship because of her removal during minority to Sweden and was entitled to all the rights and privileges of that U.S. citizenship. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decree that declared Elg &#8220;to be a natural born citizen of the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now that was a nice try and might convince a Obot, but the Supreme Court never said Elg was a Natural Born Citizen of the United States. That was an opinion and never was included in the final decision. Why do &#8220;you lie&#8221;?</p>
<p>Now wanna play? Why did the founding fathers follow our first Supreme Court Justice&#39;s lead and add the language John Jay wrote to George Washington about, concerning a Commander in Chief should have to be Natural Born? No one was Natural Born back in 1787 and no one would be Natural Born and old enough to become POTUS for over 35 tears. So, what did the founding fathers want to keep out of power? British citizens that had British citizen parents, and allegiance to a foreign power not the United States! That is exactly what we have sleeping in our White House today. What else could the founding fathers in all their wisdom have intended? Come on. hit me with your best shot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105880</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105880</guid>
		<description>You are the one whose stupidity is perfectly obvious to everyone with an IQ higher than their shoe size.  Stop using someone&#039;s legal brief as evidence.  It&#039;s not.  It&#039;s an opinion that has never been given merit in any court of law; which is exactly why Orly and people like you are losing their minds.  Here is what actually qualifies as evidence:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874): In this case decided after the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court stated (pp. 167–68): &lt;br&gt;The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. ---These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. ---Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. --As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.---&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939): The U.S. Supreme Court concluded that Marie Elizabeth Elg, who was born in the United States of Swedish parents naturalized in the United States, had not lost her birthright U.S. citizenship because of her removal during minority to Sweden and was entitled to all the rights and privileges of that U.S. citizenship. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decree that declared Elg &quot;to be a natural born citizen of the United States.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Several United States District Courts have ruled that private citizens do not have standing to challenge the eligibility of candidates to appear on a presidential election ballot.[22] Alternatively, there is a statutory method by which the eligibility of the President-elect to take office may be challenged in Congress.[23]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please try to pay attention.  I&#039;m thinking the Thorazine probably makes it hard for you to concentrate, but I&#039;ll give it another shot for those whose brains are actually open to facts.  There IS a difference between a NATURALIZED citizen and a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, but they are the only only two types.  There is no third category; which is the one you and Ms. Taitz are trying to make up for President Obama to fall under.  The Terminator falls into the naturalized citizen category.  President Obama is a Natural Born citizen.  End of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are the one whose stupidity is perfectly obvious to everyone with an IQ higher than their shoe size.  Stop using someone&#39;s legal brief as evidence.  It&#39;s not.  It&#39;s an opinion that has never been given merit in any court of law; which is exactly why Orly and people like you are losing their minds.  Here is what actually qualifies as evidence:</p>
<p>Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874): In this case decided after the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court stated (pp. 167–68): <br />The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. &#8212;These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. &#8212;Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. &#8211;As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.&#8212;</p>
<p>Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939): The U.S. Supreme Court concluded that Marie Elizabeth Elg, who was born in the United States of Swedish parents naturalized in the United States, had not lost her birthright U.S. citizenship because of her removal during minority to Sweden and was entitled to all the rights and privileges of that U.S. citizenship. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decree that declared Elg &#8220;to be a natural born citizen of the United States.&#8221; </p>
<p>Several United States District Courts have ruled that private citizens do not have standing to challenge the eligibility of candidates to appear on a presidential election ballot.[22] Alternatively, there is a statutory method by which the eligibility of the President-elect to take office may be challenged in Congress.[23]</p>
<p>Please try to pay attention.  I&#39;m thinking the Thorazine probably makes it hard for you to concentrate, but I&#39;ll give it another shot for those whose brains are actually open to facts.  There IS a difference between a NATURALIZED citizen and a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, but they are the only only two types.  There is no third category; which is the one you and Ms. Taitz are trying to make up for President Obama to fall under.  The Terminator falls into the naturalized citizen category.  President Obama is a Natural Born citizen.  End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldmagicman666</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105416</link>
		<dc:creator>oldmagicman666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105416</guid>
		<description>charles--- you are talking about a &quot;citizen&quot; we are talking about a requirement for the office of POTUS. That being one must be a Natural Born American Citizen. Not every citizen can be President. Just ask Arnold Swarchenegger. Google - John Jay, George Washington, Natural Born, and read what the founding fathers were intent on when they added this requirement.It all deals with allegiance to America and we can all tell by the first 9 months )o(, like his Communist Kenyan Brit father, has no allegiance to our country. He is trying to destroy our Capitalism to be replaced with Marxist Communism and bankrupt this Rock&#039;s greatest power. If you love America you too will join the fight to save our country from this Communist coup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>charles&#8212; you are talking about a &#8220;citizen&#8221; we are talking about a requirement for the office of POTUS. That being one must be a Natural Born American Citizen. Not every citizen can be President. Just ask Arnold Swarchenegger. Google &#8211; John Jay, George Washington, Natural Born, and read what the founding fathers were intent on when they added this requirement.It all deals with allegiance to America and we can all tell by the first 9 months )o(, like his Communist Kenyan Brit father, has no allegiance to our country. He is trying to destroy our Capitalism to be replaced with Marxist Communism and bankrupt this Rock&#39;s greatest power. If you love America you too will join the fight to save our country from this Communist coup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldmagicman666</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105408</link>
		<dc:creator>oldmagicman666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105408</guid>
		<description>Under Article 2. Section 1. paragraph 5. of our great Constitution a President must not just be a citizen he must be a &quot;Natural Born American Citizen&quot; That is a person born to parents (with a &quot;s&quot; declaring both) that are American Citizens at the time of your birth and that birth on American soil. No one knows with any certainty where he was born but everybody knows his father was never an American citizen. poppa being a British subject under the British Nationality Act or 1948 also caused the baby )o( to be born a British Citizen giving that child allegiance to England the very thing our founding fathers were dead set against having happen (real John Jay&#039;s letter to George Washington dealing with Natural Born) People are confused with &quot;citizen&quot; &quot;naturalized citizen&quot; &quot;Native Born&quot; and the requirement for POTUS &quot;Natural Born American Citizen&quot; The only time Natural Born American Citizen is used is in qualifying a President it has no other use in our government. The phrase comes from old English law and means born of Blood and Soil. The Blood of ones parents having allegiance to America which his father could never provide and the Birth on American Soil, which after a year we still have no prof of. With British Citizenship at birth and a non-American father Barack Hussein Obama Jr. can never be considered a Natural Born American Citizen and has never provided substantiated pfof he is even a true citizen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Article 2. Section 1. paragraph 5. of our great Constitution a President must not just be a citizen he must be a &#8220;Natural Born American Citizen&#8221; That is a person born to parents (with a &#8220;s&#8221; declaring both) that are American Citizens at the time of your birth and that birth on American soil. No one knows with any certainty where he was born but everybody knows his father was never an American citizen. poppa being a British subject under the British Nationality Act or 1948 also caused the baby )o( to be born a British Citizen giving that child allegiance to England the very thing our founding fathers were dead set against having happen (real John Jay&#39;s letter to George Washington dealing with Natural Born) People are confused with &#8220;citizen&#8221; &#8220;naturalized citizen&#8221; &#8220;Native Born&#8221; and the requirement for POTUS &#8220;Natural Born American Citizen&#8221; The only time Natural Born American Citizen is used is in qualifying a President it has no other use in our government. The phrase comes from old English law and means born of Blood and Soil. The Blood of ones parents having allegiance to America which his father could never provide and the Birth on American Soil, which after a year we still have no prof of. With British Citizenship at birth and a non-American father Barack Hussein Obama Jr. can never be considered a Natural Born American Citizen and has never provided substantiated pfof he is even a true citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldmagicman666</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/62644/the-washington-post-botches-it-on-orly-taitz/comment-page-16#comment-105402</link>
		<dc:creator>oldmagicman666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=62644#comment-105402</guid>
		<description>The depth of your stupidity is so tremendous, it has to be an act to allow you to combat a truth you are trying to hide, and we all know that truth is that your shining star is in reality just a piece of broken Communist junk orbiting this small rock we live on. It shown brightly for a bit but the illusion quickly faded and everyone now knows it is not what it appeared to be. You lost your credibility when you propose he will be re-elected. America had it&#039;s eyes closed to the Communist coup in 2008 but is now wide awake and at war with this attempted take over. Watch capitalism shine in 2010 an again even brighter in 2012. We will take our country back and expel all you traitors. Just hide and watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The depth of your stupidity is so tremendous, it has to be an act to allow you to combat a truth you are trying to hide, and we all know that truth is that your shining star is in reality just a piece of broken Communist junk orbiting this small rock we live on. It shown brightly for a bit but the illusion quickly faded and everyone now knows it is not what it appeared to be. You lost your credibility when you propose he will be re-elected. America had it&#39;s eyes closed to the Communist coup in 2008 but is now wide awake and at war with this attempted take over. Watch capitalism shine in 2010 an again even brighter in 2012. We will take our country back and expel all you traitors. Just hide and watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
