Patriot Act Amendments Disappoint Civil Libertarians

By
Thursday, October 01, 2009 at 3:16 pm

Though the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week included lots of expressed concern that the USA Patriot Act compromises civil liberties, the version of the bill being debated in that committee today fails to adequately address the problems, argues Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) and  the American Civil Liberties Union.

According to the ACLU, the committee substituted the original language of the bill with “a watered-down version” offered by Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).  An alternative bill, sponsored by Feingold and Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), known as the JUSTICE Act, would have added civil liberties protections not only to the Patriot Act but also to other surveillance laws.

Earlier today, Feingold similarly expressed disappointment that the bill currently being debated in the committee would not adequately provide information about how the FBI is using its authority, and would not sufficiently limit the use of national security letters, which allow the FBI to obtain customer information from businesses and prevent them from disclosing the requests to their customers.

Comments

4 Comments

Tweets that mention The Washington Independent » Patriot Act Amendments Disappoint Civil Libertarians -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted October 1, 2009 @ 3:39 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ACSLaw and WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Patriot Act Amendments Disappoint Civil Libertarians http://bit.ly/BEcVS [...]


Patriot Act Amendments Disappoint Civil Libertarians | The Lie Politic
Pingback posted October 1, 2009 @ 6:12 pm

[...] Visit Source [...]


Gavel Grab » Friday Media Summary
Pingback posted October 2, 2009 @ 12:31 pm

[...] The Washington Independent: Patriot Act Amendments Disappoint Civil Libertarians Daphne Eviatar &#82… [...]


louis vuitton neverfull mm
Comment posted August 21, 2010 @ 12:14 pm

good post!


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.