<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pawlenty: I Support Sara Taylor-Style Focus on Voter Registration Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/61881/pawlenty-i-support-sara-taylor-style-focus-on-voter-registration-fraud/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/61881/pawlenty-i-support-sara-taylor-style-focus-on-voter-registration-fraud</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: webcelt</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/61881/pawlenty-i-support-sara-taylor-style-focus-on-voter-registration-fraud/comment-page-1#comment-84298</link>
		<dc:creator>webcelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=61881#comment-84298</guid>
		<description>The follow up to Pawlenty saying he thought Bush was right to go so hard after voter fraud: did he think to question his assumptions when the Bush DOJ found nothing over eight years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The follow up to Pawlenty saying he thought Bush was right to go so hard after voter fraud: did he think to question his assumptions when the Bush DOJ found nothing over eight years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmcintee</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/61881/pawlenty-i-support-sara-taylor-style-focus-on-voter-registration-fraud/comment-page-1#comment-83769</link>
		<dc:creator>mmcintee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=61881#comment-83769</guid>
		<description>There were 146,529 absentee ballots cast in Minnesota&#039;s 2006 election.   Not 12,000 as Governor Pawlenty states.   There were even more (200,000+) absentees cast in 2004... the previous Presidential election.  See the MN Secretary of State&#039;s website here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=452&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=452&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why doesn&#039;t anyone in the media call him on his numbers as he tries to see fraud where there isn&#039;t any?    This is not the first time he has tossed out numbers that were off by a factor of 10 or even 100.   In April 2008 he claimed that 20-30% of the money that the state collects for local governments is eaten up in bureaucracy.  This was his rationalization for cutting back on local government aid.  Less than 1% of the money goes to bureaucracy.  I couldn&#039;t find anyone at the State Capitol who had the slightest idea of what the Governor meant.  After months of not returning my phone calls, I finally asked the Governor at a public press conference what he meant by that statistic.  He said that he probably &quot;misspoke&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were 146,529 absentee ballots cast in Minnesota&#39;s 2006 election.   Not 12,000 as Governor Pawlenty states.   There were even more (200,000+) absentees cast in 2004&#8230; the previous Presidential election.  See the MN Secretary of State&#39;s website here: <a href="http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=452" rel="nofollow">http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=452</a></p>
<p>Why doesn&#39;t anyone in the media call him on his numbers as he tries to see fraud where there isn&#39;t any?    This is not the first time he has tossed out numbers that were off by a factor of 10 or even 100.   In April 2008 he claimed that 20-30% of the money that the state collects for local governments is eaten up in bureaucracy.  This was his rationalization for cutting back on local government aid.  Less than 1% of the money goes to bureaucracy.  I couldn&#39;t find anyone at the State Capitol who had the slightest idea of what the Governor meant.  After months of not returning my phone calls, I finally asked the Governor at a public press conference what he meant by that statistic.  He said that he probably &#8220;misspoke&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

