Democrats Lament Midnight Changes to Patriot Act

By
Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 2:00 pm

One of the highlights of today’s House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the expiring provisions of the USA Patriot Act was Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers’ (D-Mich.) repeated lamentations about the sneaky way that the Patriot Act got passed in the first place, offering an interesting glimpse into the behind-the-scenes workings of Congress.

After the House Judiciary Committee worked for days shortly after September 11, 2001 to hammer out a bill that both parties’ representatives unanimously agreed to, Conyers recalled with obvious irritation, the House Rules committee managed to hack it up so much behind closed doors that by the time the full House voted on it the next day, it was unrecognizable.

“Then Chairman Dreier” — referring to Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.), then chairman of the House Rules Committee — “under lord knows whose instructions, substituted that bill for another bill, that we at Judiciary had never seen. So we come here today now to consider what we do with those parts that are expiring.” Conyers proceeded to say that many of the problems being discussed at the hearing with the current law would have been addressed by the original bipartisan one, such as offering an opportunity for people harmed by the Patriot Act’s abuses to seek redress. The original law also “may have eliminated, or simplified, litigation about Patriot Act abuses that continue today,” said Conyers.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who chaired today’s hearing of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, backed up Conyers’ version of what happened.

“We held in this committee five days of markup and achieved unanimity on the Patriot Act. Then the bill just disappeared. And we had a new several-hundred-page bill revealed from the Rules Committee” that had to be voted on the next day, before most members of Congress even had a chance to read it, said Nadler.

None of the Republicans at today’s hearing challenged the Democratic chairmen’s version of events.

Comments

9 Comments

Tweets that mention The Washington Independent » Democrats Lament Midnight Changes to Patriot Act -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted September 22, 2009 @ 2:06 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Harvard Law Record and WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Democrats Lament Midnight Changes to Patriot Act http://bit.ly/17UyI4 [...]


How the PATRIOT Act Came To Be « Obama Letdown Watch
Pingback posted September 22, 2009 @ 7:04 pm

[...] it’s of particular interest that today, via The Washington Independent, we found out exactly how the PATRIOT was enacted: “Then Chairman Dreier” — referring to Rep. [...]


Reexamining the PATRIOT Act | Legal-Sleaze.com
Pingback posted September 23, 2009 @ 8:58 am

[...] The Washington Independent’s Daphne Eviatar reports that during today’s hearing before the House Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers and Rep. Jerrold Nadler questioned "the sneaky way that the Patriot Act got passed in the first place, offering an interesting glimpse into the behind-the-scenes workings of Congress." The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a related hearing tomorrow. [...]


Gavel Grab » Wednesday Media Summary
Pingback posted September 23, 2009 @ 1:31 pm

[...] Washington Independent: Democrats Lament Midnight Changes to Patriot Act Daphne Eviatar -  Septembe… [...]


ginnasloane
Comment posted September 23, 2009 @ 9:33 pm

Hello!!! It seems obvious what to do: adopt the original bill that both parties’ representatives unanimously agreed to in the days shortly after September 11, 2001.


Beca
Comment posted September 24, 2009 @ 8:30 am

My question is why then don't they just outlaw this version of the Patriot Act, and unearth the 'real' version that was mysteriously replaced at the eleventh hour? When they do that, they should also try to name it something totally different, becuase the “Patriot Act” now has some very ugly connotations. This should solve the issue or revising and whatever else they are trying to do with the existing piece of crap act.


Ruggy
Comment posted September 25, 2009 @ 6:34 am

Doesn't surprise me, considering that the first version of the Patriot Act was voted on before it was even written.


SS
Comment posted October 1, 2009 @ 7:33 pm

Who forced the Congress to vote for a bill they “hadn't read”? Just as in the Iraq war, if you voted yes, you're accountable. Nice try, Mr. Conyers.


Canada Goose Jackets
Comment posted October 14, 2010 @ 9:29 am

If you want a warm winter


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.