rssThe NY Times Interview: McCain Against Gay Adoption
Monday, July 14, 2008 at 11:40 am
- 18 Comments
The New York Times yesterday featured a front-page interview with Sen. John McCain. On its Website, the newspaper published excerpts from the transcript of the interview, which included this exchange on whether gays should be allowed to become adoptive parents:
Q: President Bush believes that gay couples should not be permitted to adopt children. Do you agree with that?
Mr. McCain: I think that we’ve proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no I don’t believe in gay adoption.
Q: Even if the alternative is the kid staying in an orphanage, or not having parents.
Mr. McCain: I encourage adoption and I encourage the opportunities for people to adopt children I encourage the process being less complicated so they can adopt as quickly as possible. And Cindy and I are proud of being adoptive parents.
Q: But your concern would be that the couple should a traditional couple
Mr. McCain: Yes.
Actually, according to the American Psychological Assn., research shows "that children of gay or lesbian parents are just as mentally healthy as children with heterosexual parents," and there may even be some positive effects. Also, the sexual orientation of parents has no impact on that of their children. From the APA:
"There were very few group differences between the kids who had been brought up by same- or opposite-sex parents," says [Dr. Charlotte] Patterson, [a psychology professor at the University of Virginia], who conducted the research with students Jennifer Wainright and Stephen Russell, Ph.D., now an associate professor of sociology at the University of Arizona. One group difference that Patterson was surprised to find: Children of gay and lesbian parents reported closer ties with their schools and classmates. However, says Patterson, the difference was small and needs to be studied further.
Patterson’s study debunks the myth that children of gay or lesbian parents have trouble developing romantic relationships due to a missing father- or mother-figure–a concern that judges making custody rulings have cited. Equal numbers of teenagers from each group reported that they had been in a romantic relationship in the previous 18 months. Participants from the two groups did not differ in grade point average, symptoms of depression or self-esteem.
While the sexual orientation of the parents in Patterson’s study did not predict the adolescents’ social adjustment, the quality of the parent-child relationship did. Children who reported warm relationships with their parents tended to be the most mentally healthy and have the fewest problems in school.
So the biggest determining factor in determining the emotional health of a child is not the whether a parent is gay or straight, but the strength of the child’s relationship with his or her parents. That hardly seems surprising.
Whether McCain actually believes homosexuals are incapable of raising "successful" families or he’s just pandering to the GOP’s Christian conservative base is irrelevant. If this information is to be believed, then the net effect of McCain’s position would be to deprive parent-less children of the potential for adoption into a loving, supportive home. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, there are about two and a half times as many children waiting to be adopted as are adopted every year. As an adoptive parent himself, you would think McCain would be willing to take a more humanitarian position, for the sake of children who don’t have parents.
18 Comments
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 4:30 am
I don’t agree with President Bush.I think it is not wise to take the measure that the govement would rather let the children stay in orphanage than be adopted by the gay or lesbian parents.people discuss the topic hotly on the forum ***seekbi.com***
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 3:03 pm
Notice the answer to question 2. It is not really an answer. McCain just regurgitates what he said in question one. So, he encourages adoption. BFD. The adoption situation in America has become critical: there are very few orphanages any more. Faith-based entities used to have them on an almost regular basis, but ever since the Duplessis Orphans scandal (Quebec), the practice has been to place children in foster homes. The treatment of some children in foster homes is criminal. And the older they get, children become less attractive as adoptees. In essence, what McCain has done in his dodging of the question is say, “Well, I’d rather have the kid in an orphanage or foster care then have them grow up under the care of two queers.”
Of course, McCain had no choice about the matter: he’s lukewarm for Evangelical voters. If he said he was for gay adoption, he would have cut out a large section of society and said “Fuck You!”
It’s too late in the gain to start educating evangelicals about what the APA has found – especially since they think that the APA is in league with the Anti-Christ.
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 10:03 am
Notice the answer to question 2. It is not really an answer. McCain just regurgitates what he said in question one. So, he encourages adoption. BFD. The adoption situation in America has become critical: there are very few orphanages any more. Faith-based entities used to have them on an almost regular basis, but ever since the Duplessis Orphans scandal (Quebec), the practice has been to place children in foster homes. The treatment of some children in foster homes is criminal. And the older they get, children become less attractive as adoptees. In essence, what McCain has done in his dodging of the question is say, “Well, I'd rather have the kid in an orphanage or foster care then have them grow up under the care of two queers.”
Of course, McCain had no choice about the matter: he's lukewarm for Evangelical voters. If he said he was for gay adoption, he would have cut out a large section of society and said “Fuck You!”
It's too late in the gain to start educating evangelicals about what the APA has found – especially since they think that the APA is in league with the Anti-Christ.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 11:30 pm
I don't agree with President Bush.I think it is not wise to take the measure that the govement would rather let the children stay in orphanage than be adopted by the gay or lesbian parents.people discuss the topic hotly on the forum ***seekbi.com***
Comment posted January 29, 2009 @ 7:28 pm
Thanks for the info. May God have mercy on us all.
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 2:40 pm
Social conservatives are saddened by children in foster care or orphanages too. So that’s not the issue. The debate over gay adoption is another matter entirely. The focus here is on John McCain. Evangelicals are already feeling fidgety about McCain and have concerns about him on a number of issues. Why add to the list?
Let’s face it. Taking a hard line against gay adoption does not play well in the maverick, independent McCain persona. It doesn’t help him attract the moderates he needs But this move hurts him with the Evangelical base too.
=========================
akhil
=========================
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 2:50 pm
I can’t imagine comments like that will play well with the social conservative base at all. I mean if you’re going to say that you’re against gay adoption then why not just stick with that view rather than trying to massage it? The qualifier after the interview does some damage. Why? Because McCain had an opportunity to add the gay adoption issue to his Evangelical checklist and now it’s muddy. As for this being a state issue? Why do so many politicians use the federalist approach to get out of a sticky situation? McCain’s not the first and he won’t be the last.
==============================
akhil
=============================
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 2:54 pm
I can’t imagine comments like that will play well with the social conservative base at all. I mean if you’re going to say that you’re against gay adoption then why not just stick with that view rather than trying to massage it? The qualifier after the interview does some damage. Why? Because McCain had an opportunity to add the gay adoption issue to his Evangelical checklist and now it’s muddy. As for this being a state issue? Why do so many politicians use the federalist approach to get out of a sticky situation? McCain’s not the first and he won’t be the last.
==============================
akhil
=============================
Comment posted May 27, 2009 @ 1:19 am
Totally not agreed, there's nothing wrong with adopting a child whatever their gender was..
Comment posted May 27, 2009 @ 8:19 am
Totally not agreed, there's nothing wrong with adopting a child whatever their gender was..
Comment posted June 10, 2010 @ 3:02 am
Demonstrate a unique new concept;Thereforejordan shoes|michael jordan shoes|cheap jordan shoesboth dressed in fashionable taste therelinks of london|air jordan 23|air jordan 11|air jordan 13So,air jordan 12this is the dress of a good choice!air jordan 21|air jordan 14|air jordan 16|At the same time,also has a super-powerful visual force;air jordan 17|air jordan 19|air jordan 18|This is a pretty good article!
Comment posted September 19, 2010 @ 9:27 am
Dell Laptop Batteries
tiffany and company store
swiss replica watches
nikeoutlet
discount uggs boots
Comment posted November 24, 2010 @ 3:00 am
This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. This is very nice one and gives in depth information. Thanks for this nice article. Good post…..Valuable information for all.Coach Handbags Outlet
Coach Purses
Louis Vuitton bags
Monogram Vernis,
Louis Vuitton Purses,
Discount Louis Vuitton Bags
Coach Store,
Coach Sunglasses
Burberry Handbags
Wool Cashmere Shawls
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
