<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentagon: Gates, Joint Chiefs Support for Obama&#8217;s Missile Defense Program Is Real</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/60039/pentagon-gates-joint-chiefs-support-for-obamas-missile-defense-program-is-real/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/60039/pentagon-gates-joint-chiefs-support-for-obamas-missile-defense-program-is-real</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/60039/pentagon-gates-joint-chiefs-support-for-obamas-missile-defense-program-is-real/comment-page-1#comment-77987</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=60039#comment-77987</guid>
		<description>Uh...okay, Spencer.  I guess we can count on you to take all communiques from the Joint Chiefs and the Pentagon press secretary at face value. When the Pentagon speaks, we needn&#039;t analyze or dig for pesky facts then?  I trust you won&#039;t change your mind about this when the GOP eventually takes back the White House?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;C&#039;mon, now.  If you abhor SDI and its offspring, just come out and say so. I can respect that, especially with sound reasoning and honest factual interpretation, even if we come to different conclusions.  But siding unquestionably with the Pentagon?  That&#039;s not the real you, and it&#039;s not honest.  You ought not trade your journalistic or intellectual integrity for a cheap debating point.  It ultimately undermines your credibility.  Worse than that, it&#039;s the very kind of thing that causes so much mistrust and rancor in the ongoing debate between liberal-ish and conservative-ish Americans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I assume you care about this kind of thing.  That is, unless this &quot;independent media&quot; project you&#039;re part of is really meant to be nothing of the kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230;okay, Spencer.  I guess we can count on you to take all communiques from the Joint Chiefs and the Pentagon press secretary at face value. When the Pentagon speaks, we needn&#39;t analyze or dig for pesky facts then?  I trust you won&#39;t change your mind about this when the GOP eventually takes back the White House?  </p>
<p>C&#39;mon, now.  If you abhor SDI and its offspring, just come out and say so. I can respect that, especially with sound reasoning and honest factual interpretation, even if we come to different conclusions.  But siding unquestionably with the Pentagon?  That&#39;s not the real you, and it&#39;s not honest.  You ought not trade your journalistic or intellectual integrity for a cheap debating point.  It ultimately undermines your credibility.  Worse than that, it&#39;s the very kind of thing that causes so much mistrust and rancor in the ongoing debate between liberal-ish and conservative-ish Americans.</p>
<p>I assume you care about this kind of thing.  That is, unless this &#8220;independent media&#8221; project you&#39;re part of is really meant to be nothing of the kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

