Pentagon: Gates, Joint Chiefs Support for Obama’s Missile Defense Program Is Real

By
Friday, September 18, 2009 at 2:36 pm

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee told our own Dave Weigel that “those in the Pentagon who do answer to the commander in chief and have to answer for his policy decisions” aren’t “at a point of liberty where they can speak their minds” on the overhauled missile defense system. That sounded a lot like Huckabee was saying Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Marine Gen. James Cartwright, Adm. Michael Mullen and the entire joint chiefs of staff weren’t being candid about their views on missile defense, and if they were, they wouldn’t support it. Gates, with Cartwright next to him, yesterday said that the missile-defense overhaul came “on the recommendation and advice of his national security team and our senior military leadership.”

So what did the Pentagon think of Huckabee’s implicit suggestion that the leadership was misleading the public? “That is not the inference I would draw from Mr. Huckabee’s comments,” said Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, “but if that is what he was trying to imply I would say that Secretary Gates’ support is completely genuine … as is that of Joint Chiefs.”

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

1 Comment

Name
Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 7:43 pm

Uh…okay, Spencer. I guess we can count on you to take all communiques from the Joint Chiefs and the Pentagon press secretary at face value. When the Pentagon speaks, we needn't analyze or dig for pesky facts then? I trust you won't change your mind about this when the GOP eventually takes back the White House?

C'mon, now. If you abhor SDI and its offspring, just come out and say so. I can respect that, especially with sound reasoning and honest factual interpretation, even if we come to different conclusions. But siding unquestionably with the Pentagon? That's not the real you, and it's not honest. You ought not trade your journalistic or intellectual integrity for a cheap debating point. It ultimately undermines your credibility. Worse than that, it's the very kind of thing that causes so much mistrust and rancor in the ongoing debate between liberal-ish and conservative-ish Americans.

I assume you care about this kind of thing. That is, unless this “independent media” project you're part of is really meant to be nothing of the kind.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.