Murkowski Seeks to Thwart EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases

By
Friday, September 18, 2009 at 1:00 pm

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) wants to put the brakes on the Environmental Protection Agency’s efforts to curb climate change by barring the agency from spending any funds on regulating carbon dioxide pollution from power plants, manufacturers, and other major emissions sources. She’s asking for a one-year “timeout” so Congress can pass new legislation, despite the fact that they’ve known since April 2007 that EPA regulations were coming down the pike.

Murkowski’s proposed amendment (PDF) would allow the EPA to continue work on regulating emissions from automobiles, but would block them from using funds from “this or any other Act” to create rules governing stationary sources until after Sept. 30, 2010.

She hopes to attach it to the $32.1 billion spending bill that the Senate took up debate on yesterday, which covers the appropriations for the EPA as well as the Department of Interior and the U.S. Forest Service.

This comes as the EPA continues work on regulating carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act, in response to the 2007 Supreme Court Decision directing them to do so.

A Murkowski spokesperson told ClimateWire that the senator wants to respect the court’s decision, but that a one-year timeout is needed to give Congress enough time to come up with a legislative solution.

Update: Murkowski’s office informed TWI that this is not the most recent version of the proposed amendment. Her spokesperson said the senator is seeking bipartisan support for the amendment and does not yet have a final version ready to be introduced.

Update: Murkowski’s office just sent the text of the latest version of the amendment, which states:

Effective during the 1-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, none of the funds made available for the Environmental Protection Agency under this Act may be expended to regulate or control carbon dioxide from any sources other than a mobile source as described in section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act or to treat carbon dioxide as a pollutant subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act except for purposes of section 10 202(a) of that Act.

Update: Here is the latest version of the amendment. Murkowski’s office said the senator is seeking bipartisan support for the amendment, and the language may still change. The spokesman said the senator has not made a final decision as to whether she will introduce the amendment, but will decide by mid-week.

The spokesperson also said that Murkowski does not want to thwart action on climate change entirely — just put if off for a bit longer. “Sen. Murkowski is not seeking to derail or delay congressional action on climate change,” said the spokesman. “She simply wants adequate time for the legislative process to work in order to avoid enacting a law that could have devastating unintended consequences on the economy.”

Comments

14 Comments

Tweets that mention The Washington Independent » Mukowski Seeks to Thwart EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted September 18, 2009 @ 1:03 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Mukowski Seeks to Thwart EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases http://bit.ly/8B6Ol [...]


alan__b
Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 5:26 pm

Brakes…………….


Swami_Binkinanda
Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 10:17 pm

Daddy's girl is no smarter or better than her dippy Daddy was.


monkey99
Comment posted September 21, 2009 @ 1:16 am

Maybe Murkowski and Michelle Bachmann can huff that “harmless gas” , carbon dioxide. See how long before they turn green. Gosh, I never took a CPR class!


monkey99
Comment posted September 21, 2009 @ 6:23 am

On second thought, I think they already are! QUICK! Get the Halon! we have to counteract the carbon dioxide!!


Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.
Pingback posted September 21, 2009 @ 2:42 pm

[...] Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) wants to put the brakes on the Environmental Protection Agency’s ef… [...]


Lisa Murkowski proposes to fiddle while Alaska burns | Going Green
Pingback posted September 21, 2009 @ 2:47 pm

[...] Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) wants to put the brakes on the Environmental Protection Agency’s ef… [...]


Raleigh Latham
Comment posted September 21, 2009 @ 7:24 pm

Her state is melting, polar bears, walruses and caribou are dying in the thousands, and millions of acres of alaskan forest are being infested from pine beetles, and yet…this horrible person, Senator Lisa Murkowski….want's to delay action, endangering the livelihoods of everyone in her state, she should be thrown out of office…NOW.


Lisa Murkowski proposes to fiddle while Alaska burns | Climate Vine
Pingback posted September 21, 2009 @ 8:32 pm

[...] Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) wants to put the brakes on the Environmental Protection Agency’s ef… [...]


Greenhoof » Blog Archive » Lisa Murkowski’s bid to become a climate outlaw
Pingback posted September 22, 2009 @ 6:36 pm

[...] (R-Alaska) behaving like an outlaw? It’s jarring to learn that Sen. Murkowski wants to take away U.S. Environmental Protection Agency authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions from oil refineries, coal-burning power plants and other [...]


Getting Serious About Global Warming
Pingback posted September 24, 2009 @ 6:11 pm

[...] to impose new carbon dioxide regulations.” And Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) “wants to take away U.S. Environmental Protection Agency authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions from oil refineries, coal-burning power plants and other [...]


Lisa Murkowski proposes to fiddle while Alaska burns « Regurgitation
Pingback posted December 1, 2009 @ 4:03 pm

[...] Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) wants to put the brakes on the Environmental Protection Agency’s ef… [...]


jordan shoes
Comment posted June 9, 2010 @ 6:38 am

Demonstrate a unique new concept.


1061367
Comment posted September 7, 2011 @ 12:50 pm

1061367 beers on the wall. sck was here


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.