The Balance Sheet on the Scrapped Missile Shield

Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 10:02 am

So let’s total up what was gained and what was lost by the Obama administration’s decision to scrap the never-built ballistic missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic. In favor of abandonment:

1. Russia, a much more important country than either Poland or the Czech Republic, viewed it as needlessly provocative.

2. The thing was never actually built, so getting rid of the plans to build it is fairly cost-free.

3. The thing was more about Eastern European political fears of a resurgent Russia, which are better dealt with through diplomatic means.

4. Iran isn’t dreaming of raining missiles down on Prague or Gdansk.

5. Moving Patriot batteries into Poland is an adequate political substitute for Polish anxieties.

[UPDATE: 6: Oh, and there are alternative missile-defense systems like Aegis that would be used as a substitute in a couple of years; plus closer-to-Iran interceptors as well

In favor of continuation:

1. Iran might someday at some point acquire this missile capability and then decide what it wants to do is blackmail European countries into giving it all their gold coins.

2. Russia isn’t an important country and even if it were, the United States ought to cherish the memory of when it was cool to provoke it.

Eric Edelman, the second Bush-administration undersecretary of defense for policy, tells The Wall Street Journal’s Peter Spiegel that he saw intelligence reports on the pace at which Iran is making technological progress on long-range missiles. But you know who sees more intelligence reports on those missiles? Edelman’s former boss, Defense Secretary Bob Gates. If Gates, the model of a pragmatic defense secretary who often discusses the need to reset defense policy around “real” and not “hypothetical” threats, doesn’t see an actual cost to U.S. or allied security, then none exists.

You can follow TWI on Twitter and Facebook.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter



Tweets that mention The Washington Independent » The Balance Sheet on the Scrapped Missile Shield --
Pingback posted September 17, 2009 @ 10:08 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Fung and WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: The Balance Sheet on the Scrapped Missile Shield [...]

We’re Canceling Our Order Of Fries « Around The Sphere
Pingback posted September 17, 2009 @ 10:47 am

[...] Spencer Ackerman at Washington Independent: In favor of abandonment: [...]

Goodbye, Theoretical Missile Shield | Oliver Willis
Pingback posted September 17, 2009 @ 2:18 pm

[...] totally horrible that President Obama scrapped a useless initiative in favor of a sane, realistic [...]

Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 5:11 am

What was Obama supposed to do, push the missile defence system and instigate hostility towards Russia when the system was overly aggressive from the start?

Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 1:22 pm

Two quick points – first, I keep reading statements to the effect that the Polish and Czech people are going to be dismayed by this action. In fact, the majorities of the actual population resisted the US bases. It was the governments who wanted the US money, not the “protection” that it was dressed up to be. Second, I would note that Gates' opinion isn't really that valid. This is, in the end, a political decision – SHOULD we deploy an untested strategic missile defense effort against a nation that doesn't yet have either nukes or an ability to range the United States. The military question is, CAN we deploy an untested strategic missile defense system… or are there alternatives (yes to both questions). Our Cold War neocons continue the fallacy that there are only military options to foreign policy questions.

Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 1:44 pm

Russia isn't an important country!? This statement can only be made by someone who isn't an important journalist.

Comment posted September 20, 2009 @ 1:34 am

Read it again.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.