<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Bagram Rules Seem a Lot Like Old GTMO Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bagram: The sham of closing Guantanamo - Salon.com</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-256426</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagram: The sham of closing Guantanamo - Salon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 12:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-256426</guid>
		<description>[...] wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.&#160; Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.&#160; Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bagram: The sham of closing Guantanamo</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-243861</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagram: The sham of closing Guantanamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-243861</guid>
		<description>[...] wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.&#160; Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.&#160; Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikileaks Video Release of Collateral Murder and Other Insights Into The Psychopathic M.I.C. &#171; Streams of consciousness</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-150408</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikileaks Video Release of Collateral Murder and Other Insights Into The Psychopathic M.I.C. &#171; Streams of consciousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-150408</guid>
		<description>[...] whether its &#8216;new system&#8217; is a sufficient Constitutional replacement for habeas review. [Spencer] Ackerman quotes David Remes, the legal director of the non-profit Appeal for Justice law firm who represents [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whether its &#8216;new system&#8217; is a sufficient Constitutional replacement for habeas review. [Spencer] Ackerman quotes David Remes, the legal director of the non-profit Appeal for Justice law firm who represents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Roston - Newsbroke &#8211; A subprime Nobel Peace Prize for President Barack Obama - True/Slant</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-86135</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roston - Newsbroke &#8211; A subprime Nobel Peace Prize for President Barack Obama - True/Slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-86135</guid>
		<description>[...] he&#8217;s failed to come up with a plan to close Guantanamo Bay, and he possibly may be preserving the prison at the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan as a Guantanamo-like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he&#8217;s failed to come up with a plan to close Guantanamo Bay, and he possibly may be preserving the prison at the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan as a Guantanamo-like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Progressive Mind &#187; Green Change : Bagram: The sham of closing Guantanamo</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-80495</link>
		<dc:creator>The Progressive Mind &#187; Green Change : Bagram: The sham of closing Guantanamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-80495</guid>
		<description>[...] the wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.  Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.  Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippi&#8217;s ClipBoard &#171; Streams of consciousness</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-78504</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippi&#8217;s ClipBoard &#171; Streams of consciousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-78504</guid>
		<description>[...] its &#8216;new system&#8217; is a sufficient Constitutional replacement for habeas review.  [Spencer] Ackerman quotes David Remes, the legal director of the non-profit Appeal for Justice law firm who represents [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its &#8216;new system&#8217; is a sufficient Constitutional replacement for habeas review.  [Spencer] Ackerman quotes David Remes, the legal director of the non-profit Appeal for Justice law firm who represents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salon: Obama&#8217;s pledge to close Gitmo is a sham &#124; America 20XY</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-78392</link>
		<dc:creator>Salon: Obama&#8217;s pledge to close Gitmo is a sham &#124; America 20XY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-78392</guid>
		<description>[...] the wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.  Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the wake of this new filing, numerous commentators made excellent points about these shenanigans.  Spencer Ackerman notes that, the day before the ruling, the administration leaked that they were creating &#8220;new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Wants to Have His Guantanamo and Eat it Too &#124; NYU Local</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-77420</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Wants to Have His Guantanamo and Eat it Too &#124; NYU Local</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-77420</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama administration&#8217;s new plan for dealing with detainees is roughly equivalent to Guantanamo&#8217;s CSRT system, in which prisoners were put before a makeshift military tribunal (not a civilian court). They were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama administration&#8217;s new plan for dealing with detainees is roughly equivalent to Guantanamo&#8217;s CSRT system, in which prisoners were put before a makeshift military tribunal (not a civilian court). They were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where, oh where, has the fierce moral urgency gone? &#171; Cadillac Tight</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-76879</link>
		<dc:creator>Where, oh where, has the fierce moral urgency gone? &#171; Cadillac Tight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-76879</guid>
		<description>[...] Republicans. We&#8217;ve seen it with rendition, with the drone bombing in Pakistan, and now we see Spencer Ackerman calling out Obama over habeas &#8212; That&#8217;s right, habeas, the issue the left and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Republicans. We&#8217;ve seen it with rendition, with the drone bombing in Pakistan, and now we see Spencer Ackerman calling out Obama over habeas &#8212; That&#8217;s right, habeas, the issue the left and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama: Violating Habeas Corpus Okay When It&#8217;s Not At Gitmo</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/58971/new-bagram-rules-seem-a-lot-like-old-gtmo-rules/comment-page-1#comment-76863</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama: Violating Habeas Corpus Okay When It&#8217;s Not At Gitmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=58971#comment-76863</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;Alex Knapp&#160;&#124;&#160;Tuesday, September 15, 2009   This must be some of that &#8220;change&#8221; that Obama is always talking about: a change of names, anyway. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;Alex Knapp&nbsp;|&nbsp;Tuesday, September 15, 2009   This must be some of that &#8220;change&#8221; that Obama is always talking about: a change of names, anyway. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

