Peter Singer: No, Cass Sunstein Isn’t My Disciple
Tuesday, September 08, 2009 at 3:18 pm
I reported last week that Cass Sunstein, the Harvard Law School professor whose nomination to run the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs is in Senate limbo, would be the next target of Glenn Beck and the rest of the anti-”czars” crusade. On July 22, Beck hosted David Martosko of the Center for Consumer Freedom to explain that Sunstein was actually a radical animal rights activist.
A partial transcript:
MARTOSKO: He is a philosopher in the mold of Peter Singer.
BECK: Hang on just a second. Peter Singer, America, in case you don’t know who Peter Singer is — Peter Singer is the guy, he is the chair of ethics at Princeton University. He believes — he first came out and said, “You can abort a baby 20 days after birth.” Then he came out and apologized because there was some outcry on that one, and he said, “I’m sorry, I shouldn’t have put a number on it because actually a baby isn’t really human until it can realize that there’s a tomorrow. So, up until two years, two years of age, you can abort a child. OK.
MARTOSKO: OK.
BECK: So, he’s a friend of Peter Singer’s.
MARTOSKO: Yes. He is a — he is a disciple of Singer’s. I mean, Singer is in favor of infanticide and this whole idea of quality adjusted life years.
BECK: Yes.
So I asked Peter Singer about this. His response:
It’s absurd. Cass Sunstein has developed his own views on this issue. You might as well say that Glenn Beck is a disciple of Lyndon LaRouche because they agree on opposing the public health care option. (Incidentally, Glenn Beck’s characterization of my views in that clip is also a grotesque distortion.)
My “work” with Cass Sunstein on these issues consists, in its entirety, in my attending a one-day workshop at the University of Chicago some years ago on a proposal to label animal products so that consumers could know more about how the animals were treated. If I recall correctly, the workshop was co-hosted by Sunstein and Martha Nussbaum.
He also once reprinted an essay of mine in a book that he co-edited with Nussbaum.
That’s it.
I talked to Martosko, too, and will have more about all of this later. [UPDATE: The Singer quote has been revised to correct a small error from our original conversation.]
Follow David Weigel on Twitter
9 Comments
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 7:33 pm
Do you have a database of talk radio transcripts at your disposal? Or do you have a membership to his site?
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 7:34 pm
Trying to get a straight answer out of someone paid not to give one seems sort of like a foolish proposition, doesn't it?
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 7:57 pm
By the way — next time you report on Cass Sunstein — don't forget that there are PROGRESSIVE objections to his nomination. It's not just rightwing kookery.
check out:
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/10/ca…
and
http://www.progressivereform.org/SunsteinOIRA.cfm
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 8:13 pm
Since the issue is ABOUT kookery, instead of honest and upfront ideological/political differences, that's hardly relevant, So.
As an aside though, I'd really like more detail on why cost-benefit analysis is allegedly so suspect, simply because it's possible to do one badly. Of course it is. But generally that's because the people claiming to do them have no idea what a C/B actually is in the first place (anyone that counts “increased tax revenue” as a benefit, for instance, has flunked the basic principle of C/B right off the bat, which is that wealth transfers are themselves neither costs nor benefits)
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 9:57 pm
Okay … I'm a “disciple” of Jesus Christ, but I never met the guy and we never co-wrote any papers.
What's the problem here. Are you really going to go balls-to-the-wall over semantics?
If Sunstein is an animal-rights believer, chances are his philosophy was informed by–if not DOMINATED by–Peter Singer.
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 11:00 pm
And if my aunt had a package, she'd be my uncle. Your point?
Pingback posted September 9, 2009 @ 1:10 pm
[...] friend link: read there Tags: animal, cass, peter, rights, singer, [...]
Comment posted September 9, 2009 @ 2:47 pm
Point? Person one says he's a Singer disciple. Singer says “naaah.” But discipleship is in the eye of the student, not the teacher.
Comment posted September 9, 2009 @ 2:56 pm
And yet, don't count on Beck to actually ask said student… he would much rather do his usual schtick and run with this one.
And no, if you are an animal-rights believer, your views do not have to be informed by or dominated by Peter Singer. There are believers in the rights of animals, even above those of humans who have never heard of Pete Singer.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss