U.S. Citizen Can Sue Ashcroft for Wrongful Detention

By
Tuesday, September 08, 2009 at 8:58 am

Few innocent victims of post-9/11 counter-terrorism policies have been able to sustain their claims against government officials in federal courts, although many have tried.  But on Friday, a federal appeals court held that a U.S. citizen detained for more than two weeks as a “material witness” and then released under severe restrictions can sue former Attorney General John Ashcroft for the policy that led to his treatment. The court also held that the U.S. government cannot “preventively” detain or investigate suspects.

Abdullah al-Kidd, a Kansan who converted to Islam in college, was arrested in 2003 after he and his wife became targets of an FBI anti-terrorism investigation involving surveillance of Arab and Muslim men. The FBI never found any evidence against al-Kidd, but believed he might have information that would be useful to another prosecution. Although al-Kidd agreed to cooperate, the FBI detained him for the next 16 days in high-security prisons in Virginia, Oklahoma and Idaho. Strip-searched and shackled, he was kept in a cell that was lit 24 hours a day.

Al-Kidd was finally allowed to leave, but only if he promised to live at his in-laws’ home in Nevada, limit his travel to only four states, report regularly to a probation officer and consent to home visits for more than a year. Fifteen months’ later, he and his wife had separated, and al-Kidd was fired from his job after he was denied a security clearance due to his arrest, he claims. He was also denied a chance to study in Saudi Arabia on a scholarship.

Al-Kidd was never charged with any crime or called as a witness in any trial.

In March 2005, Al-Kidd sued Ashcroft for what he claims was an illegal policy of detaining Muslim men suspected of terrorism as material witnesses even though there was no evidence against them, they’d agreed to cooperate with the government and posed no security risk.

Like other former government officials sued in recent years for promulgating unlawful counter-terrorism policies, Ashcroft claimed he was immune from suit as a government official doing his job. But in this case, the court ruled against him. There was no doubt that it was unconstitutional to arrest a person without probable cause that he committed a crime under the pretext that he may be a witness to one, the court ruled.

“All seizures of criminal suspects require probable cause of criminal activity. To use a material witness statute pretextually, in order to investigate or preemptively detain suspects without probable cause, is to violate the Fourth Amendment.”

Writing for the court, Judge Milan Smith continued, suggesting concerns broader than al-Kidd’s case alone:

Framers of our Constitution would have disapproved of the arrest, detention, and harsh confinement of a United States citizen as a “material witness” under the circumstances, and for the immediate purpose alleged, in al-Kidd’s complaint. Sadly, however, even now, more than 217 years after the ratification of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, some confidently assert that the government has the power to arrest and detain or restrict American citizens for months on end, in sometimes primitive conditions, not because there is evidence that they have committed a crime, but merely because the government wishes to investigate them for possible wrongdoing, or to prevent them from having contact with others in the outside world. We find this to be repugnant to the Constitution, and a painful reminder of some of the most ignominious chapters of our national history.

Al-Kidd still has to prove the facts of his case, but he’s scored a significant legal victory.

“The court made it very clear today that former Attorney General Ashcroft’s use of the federal material witness law circumvented the Constitution,” said American Civil Liberties Union Immigrants’ Rights Project Deputy Director Lee Gelernt, who argued the appeal. “Regardless of your rank or title, you can’t escape liability if you personally created and oversaw a policy that deliberately violates the law.”

That victory may not translate to many of the other cases involving victims of post-9/11 U.S. government detention policies who were not U.S. citizens, however, or who were detained in prisons abroad. Courts have generally ruled that the rights of non-citizens detained in overseas prisons were not sufficiently clear in the initial years after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to warrant denying government officials immunity from lawsuits, even if the detainees were held for years without charge or trial.

Comments

7 Comments

U.S. Citizen Can Sue Ashcroft for Wrongful Detention | Free Student Scholarship
Pingback posted September 8, 2009 @ 9:18 am

[...] U.S. Citizen Can Sue Ashcroft for Wrongful Detention Share and Enjoy: [...]


The Washington Independent » U.S. Citizen Can Sue Ashcroft for … | Citizen watch live today
Pingback posted September 8, 2009 @ 11:30 am

[...] General Evangelist Ashcroft for the contract that led … Go here to feature the rest:  The pedagogue Independent » U.S. Citizen Can Sue Ashcroft for … Posted in Uncategorized | Tags: a-federal-appeals, attorney, attorney-general, court-held, [...]


U.S. Citizen Can Sue Ashcroft for Wrongful Detention « Later On
Pingback posted September 8, 2009 @ 2:10 pm

[...] in Bush Administration, Daily life, Government, Law at 11:09 am by LeisureGuy Daphne Eviatar in the Washington Independent: Few innocent victims of post-9/11 counter-terrorism policies have been able to sustain their [...]


valentinegastoine
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 11:47 pm

The over-population within government is indeed not a myth, no society can exist with so many people who are paid by the people’s taxes, live in expensive homes, send their kids to the best schools yet refuse to ride the train, as driving want someone else to pay for the gas. Republicans are noted for this, not wanting to provide assistance to greedy relatives, hence create a job for them in part to get them off their back. The unions take a similar stand breaking the back of the company whom believe it or not pay the majority of taxes not the individual, regulations upon regulations, no one able to compete as throwing the ball to the foreign based company, the lawsuit to the US company. Does no one recall the basics of democracy, it’s base in the US Constitution without which there is no government or at least not a legal one.

The US motor car once the leader if not originator of automobile manufacture, still remains a leader, especially in design, no longer has a frame, the frame has been replaced by air bags, required car seats for children, TV, audible and visible maps, if not phones, a far greater concern imposed by the US government for fuel economy, something had to give, so it was the frame, ain’t life great! I say why not try using the train, the East Coast system seems to make a lot more sense than continued expansion of road, highway and bridge, if not restrictions of the automobile industry, hopefully the bridge will not collapse as unable to bear the strain and weight of rush hour traffic, bumper to bumper cars if not trucks and big ‘ins. Why not take a train, “leave the driving to us” which is done on the East Coast, very little if any pollution to mass transit?

The car lasts longer, tends to be more durable, reflects what Detroit likes to make, an engine that turns over at 100,000 not turns in, comfort for 4 adults, head and leg room and factory air, nice colors that blend in with the horizon not garish colors that make you squint. Do we have to bring in N. Korea so as to be permitted to use the train, bus, mass transit rather than pick up “the dead” from the mini-compact which does not just resemble a motor cycle, occupants could not withstand much of crash, regardless of the airbag. Detroit ain’t my home, but it’s got my heart, if it weren’t for government would there be unions, driving up the cost of everything, everywhere.


Supreme Court Will Hear Whether Man Detained Without Charge Can Sue John Ashcroft « South Capitol Street
Pingback posted October 18, 2010 @ 11:18 am

[...] in March 2003 as a “material witness” in a terrorism investigation. According to the Washington Independent, al-Kidd was detained in high-security prisons for 16 days, strip-searched and shackled. When they [...]


Birgün Mutlaka
Comment posted February 22, 2011 @ 6:58 pm

gulamin chat en kaliteli sohbet chat siteleri ve sohbet odalar? olmaya aday canl? sohbet sitesidir. sohbet siteleri aras?nda lider olmaya devam ediyor.
Ayr?ca ahmet kaya sitemizde sanatç?ya ait albümler ve haberler bulunmaktad?r. bedava sohbet etmek icin linklere t?klay?n?z.sohbet siteleri engüzel sohbet burda…
sohbet odas? sohbet odas?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.