<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plan B in Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/57477/plan-b-in-afghanistan/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/57477/plan-b-in-afghanistan</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: knowbuddhau</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/57477/plan-b-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1#comment-70874</link>
		<dc:creator>knowbuddhau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=57477#comment-70874</guid>
		<description>Word!  I still see Yglesias, TP, and CAP as war-mongering fauxy leftists, in the light Jeremy Scahill and others have shed on their shilling for ever more war.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br&gt;Rahm Emanuel&#039;s Think Tankers Enforce &#039;Message Discipline&#039; Among &#039;Liberals&#039;&lt;br&gt;By Jeremy Scahill, RebelReports&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Over the past several weeks, independent journalists and anti-war activists have tried to shine a spotlight on how groups like the Center for American Progress and MoveOn, which portrayed themselves as anti-war during the Bush-era, are now supporting the escalation and continuation of wars because their guy is now commander-in-chief. CAP has been actively pounding the pavement in support of the escalation in Afghanistan, the rebranding of the Iraq occupation and, more recently, Obama’s bloated military budget, which the group said was “on target.” MoveOn has been silent on the escalation in Afghanistan and has devoted substantial resources to promoting a federal budget that includes a $21 billion increase in military spending from the Bush-era.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is clear here is that CAP and MoveOn are now basically psuedo-official PR flaks targeting “liberals” to support the White House agenda. This, though, should not come as a shock to those who have closely monitored these groups. They were the primary force behind Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI), “a coalition that spent tens of millions of dollars using Iraq as a political bludgeon against Republican politicians, while refusing to pressure the Democratic Congress to actually cut off funding for the war.” Now, according to John Stauber, executive director of the Center for Media and Democracy, the Center for American Progress is now running “Progressive Media which was begun by Tom Matzzie and David Brock in 2008 and now ‘represents a serious ratcheting up of efforts to present a united liberal front in the coming policy wars….’ [These groups] are working hard to push Obama’s policies, including rationalizlng or defending his escalation of the wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan as “sustainable security.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rebelreports.com/post/94549885/rahm-emanuels-think-tankers-enforce-message&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://rebelreports.com/post/94549885/rahm-eman...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pepe Escobar discusses the real method to our military madness: full-spectrum dominance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~~~~~~~~~&lt;br&gt;US&#039;s &#039;arc of instability&#039; just gets bigger&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By Pepe Escobar&lt;br&gt;AsiaTimes Online (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atimes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.atimes.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The New Great Game is not only focused on the face-off between the United States and strategic competitors Russia and China - with Pipelineistan as a defining element.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The full spectrum dominance doctrine requires the control of the Pentagon-coined &quot;arc of instability&quot; from the Horn of Africa to western China. The cover story is the former &quot;global war on terror&quot;, now &quot;overseas contingency operations&quot; under the management of President Barack Obama&#039;s administration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of all, the underlying logic remains divide and rule.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KI03Df01.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KI03Df0...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even here at home, right Yglesias?  Eff you and your war-mongering, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word!  I still see Yglesias, TP, and CAP as war-mongering fauxy leftists, in the light Jeremy Scahill and others have shed on their shilling for ever more war.</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~<br />Rahm Emanuel&#39;s Think Tankers Enforce &#39;Message Discipline&#39; Among &#39;Liberals&#39;<br />By Jeremy Scahill, RebelReports</p>
<p>Over the past several weeks, independent journalists and anti-war activists have tried to shine a spotlight on how groups like the Center for American Progress and MoveOn, which portrayed themselves as anti-war during the Bush-era, are now supporting the escalation and continuation of wars because their guy is now commander-in-chief. CAP has been actively pounding the pavement in support of the escalation in Afghanistan, the rebranding of the Iraq occupation and, more recently, Obama’s bloated military budget, which the group said was “on target.” MoveOn has been silent on the escalation in Afghanistan and has devoted substantial resources to promoting a federal budget that includes a $21 billion increase in military spending from the Bush-era.</p>
<p>What is clear here is that CAP and MoveOn are now basically psuedo-official PR flaks targeting “liberals” to support the White House agenda. This, though, should not come as a shock to those who have closely monitored these groups. They were the primary force behind Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI), “a coalition that spent tens of millions of dollars using Iraq as a political bludgeon against Republican politicians, while refusing to pressure the Democratic Congress to actually cut off funding for the war.” Now, according to John Stauber, executive director of the Center for Media and Democracy, the Center for American Progress is now running “Progressive Media which was begun by Tom Matzzie and David Brock in 2008 and now ‘represents a serious ratcheting up of efforts to present a united liberal front in the coming policy wars….’ [These groups] are working hard to push Obama’s policies, including rationalizlng or defending his escalation of the wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan as “sustainable security.”<br /><a href="http://rebelreports.com/post/94549885/rahm-emanuels-think-tankers-enforce-message" rel="nofollow">http://rebelreports.com/post/94549885/rahm-eman&#8230;</a><br />~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>Pepe Escobar discusses the real method to our military madness: full-spectrum dominance.</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~<br />US&#39;s &#39;arc of instability&#39; just gets bigger</p>
<p>By Pepe Escobar<br />AsiaTimes Online (<a href="http://www.atimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.atimes.com</a>)</p>
<p>The New Great Game is not only focused on the face-off between the United States and strategic competitors Russia and China &#8211; with Pipelineistan as a defining element.</p>
<p>The full spectrum dominance doctrine requires the control of the Pentagon-coined &#8220;arc of instability&#8221; from the Horn of Africa to western China. The cover story is the former &#8220;global war on terror&#8221;, now &#8220;overseas contingency operations&#8221; under the management of President Barack Obama&#39;s administration.</p>
<p>Most of all, the underlying logic remains divide and rule.<br /><a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KI03Df01.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KI03Df0&#8230;</a><br />~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>Even here at home, right Yglesias?  Eff you and your war-mongering, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/57477/plan-b-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1#comment-70866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=57477#comment-70866</guid>
		<description>What are we doing in Afghanistan again? What&#039;s the goal? How do we benefit? I&#039;m still in the dark on all of this.  Even the Yglesias statement doesn&#039;t do it for me. Keep a lid on the Taliban? To what end? Shore up the Afghan government? A fools errand. Shoring up Karzai or some other &quot;democratically elected official&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are we doing in Afghanistan again? What&#39;s the goal? How do we benefit? I&#39;m still in the dark on all of this.  Even the Yglesias statement doesn&#39;t do it for me. Keep a lid on the Taliban? To what end? Shore up the Afghan government? A fools errand. Shoring up Karzai or some other &#8220;democratically elected official&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Manson Invasion of Afghanistan Afghanistan Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/57477/plan-b-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1#comment-70872</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Manson Invasion of Afghanistan Afghanistan Pakistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=57477#comment-70872</guid>
		<description>[...] The Washington Independent » Plan B in Afghanistan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Washington Independent » Plan B in Afghanistan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

