There’s Something About Orly
Monday, August 31, 2009 at 10:58 am
The indispensable Terry Krepel asks a good question: Why has WorldNetDaily not quoted Orly Taitz since dutifully promoting her forged “Kenyan birth certificate”?
Ignoring Taitz after months of championing her… is not the same as telling the truth about her. Do Farah and WND have the journalistic guts to tell their readers about Taitz’s questionable lawyering and her wackjob conspiracies?
It’s a good question. Via my friends at Politijab.com, we now have an exclusive look into how Taitz argues before the innumerable courts she finds herself in front of. Here’s the transcript of the first hearing in Brockhausen v. Andrade, on January 22.

Compare this with how Taitz described the hearing.
When I asked him to allow me to represent her pro hac vice, pro bono after I made an effort of flying and driving from CA all night long, he stated that he didn’t sign pro hca vice application, at which time I told him that there is nothing preventing him from signing it now. He finally agreed.
She didn’t say anything like that. The credence that WorldNetDaily gave her is truly stunning in retrospect.
Follow David Weigel on Twitter
42 Comments
Comment posted August 31, 2009 @ 7:10 pm
“Indispensable”? Here's more on Terry Krepel. Maybe he and Weigel could pool the money they get from their wonderful employers and take logic lessons together.
Comment posted August 31, 2009 @ 8:22 pm
Tell you something else — she lied to the judge's face three times in that brief section of the transcript you quoted.
There isn't a chance in a million that she read the State Bar Act, the State Bar Rules, or the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.
This is Orly we're talking about … the worst lawyer in this great land of ours. She never read the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, either, until us folks at Politijab.com shoved them down her throat.
She'll be disbarred soon, and then who will the Moonbat Army turn to as their leader?
Comment posted August 31, 2009 @ 8:46 pm
[reposting, since for some wild and wacky reason this comment was deleted]
“Indispensable”? Here's more on Terry Krepel. Maybe he and Weigel could pool the money they get from their wonderful employers and take logic lessons together.
Comment posted August 31, 2009 @ 8:56 pm
Please please please visit my website! I need the ad revenue to buy tin foil!
Comment posted August 31, 2009 @ 9:46 pm
Like birthers are so full of logic they can sit in judgment of others…LOL! Sorry, 24, you're not getting any more clicks from me for your wild delusions…leave you to the other birthers, or should I say blowers since the latest is you folks want to see Obama's privates now to see if he's been circumcised. Let's see how you do in court with that one.
Comment posted August 31, 2009 @ 11:19 pm
read the whole transcript, it's hilarious.
I love the part at the end when the judge tells Brockhausen to get out of his court room..
Comment posted September 1, 2009 @ 1:30 am
24Ahead, the Prince of All Birfers! I'm sure he's taking classes for his JD from Hollywood Upstairs Law School right now.
Comment posted September 1, 2009 @ 3:01 am
My sense of logic is just fine. 24ahead has a problem with hypersensitive word-parsing.
Oh, and thanks for the recognition, David — I appreciate it.
Comment posted September 1, 2009 @ 11:47 am
To begin with, as a lawyer, reading anything Orly Taitz puts in writing to file with the courts is a mortifying experience. I can't finish a single line without wincing, cringing, or flat out crying multiple times.
That transcript has the same effect, except the sheer hilarity of her performance is enough to keep me from crying. I mean, Orly didn't even come close to addressing the jurisdictional issue in any sense, and didn't even draw out the slightest bit of any interest at all from the judge in addressing her argument.
“Blah blah blah Obama is Hitler and election fraud and federal courts and hoo ha I live on the moon and Mr. Obama blah blah.”
“Okay. Is that it?”
“Yes.”
“The plea to the jurisdiction is granted.”
LOL
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 7:37 pm
When your father is not an American Citizen and never became one. When your father was a Kenyan and therefore a British Subject under the British Nationality Act of 1948 which caused you to be born a British Subject at the moment of birth no matter where that birth took place. When your 2nd father took you to Indonesia and made you a Indonesian citizen and gave you a new name. You can never be considered a Natural Born American Citizen. Natural Born, old British Common Law, Born of Blood & Soil. That's the “Blood” of parents (with a “s” meaning both) and birth on the “Soil” of the country in question. There is no way the man in our White House today can be considered a Natural Born American Citizen under the requirement covered in John Jay's letter to George Washington.
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 8:52 pm
Thankfully we use the Constitution and not John Jay's correspendence as the basis of law in this land.
Just admit you're a racist and get over it.
The amount of Quisling-like behavior from a pack of neo-thugs these days is ridiculous. You all LOST an election. Try again next time like the process allows. Also, if Obama is a socialist – or even a liberal – I'm freaking Grimace from McDonaldland.
Get over yourselves, you are making the rest of your party look even less credible than they already were.
Comment posted September 9, 2009 @ 5:39 am
BREAKING NEWS A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution. If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.
In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, also were restored to the case.
Want to know for certain where Obama was born? Demand the truth by joining the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
The judge did comment that if there are legitimate constitutional questions regarding Obama's eligibility, they need to be addressed and resolved.
Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery.
If the case survives that challenge, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.
The case would be the first time, according to Kreep, that the actual merits of the dispute will have been heard in open court. A multitude of such disputes have been rejected out of hand by various state and federal courts. Even the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly has rejected urgent appeals to hear the evidence.
The suit alleges Obama is actually a citizen of Indonesia and “possibly still citizen of Kenya, usurping the position of the president of the United States of America and the commander-in-chief.”
Comment posted September 11, 2009 @ 11:18 pm
sure, trash Dr. Orly, ya little nonentity. She's working hard for US and what are you doing — sipping lattes and trying to pick up boys? please, go back to reporting onneighborhood art gallery openings. you might be good at that, possibly.
Comment posted September 12, 2009 @ 6:19 am
Your darling “Dr. Orly” is an embarrassment to the legal profession.
Comment posted September 12, 2009 @ 6:25 am
You have no idea what you're talking about, you doorknob. I find it hilarious that you birthers cite Jay's letter to Washington as support for your completely fabricated theory that having two parents who are U.S. citizens is a requirement for being a “natural born citizen” of the United States. Nothing whatsoever in Jay's language in that letter supports that argument (and even if there were, Jay's correspondence is not the law of the land), and there's no support anywhere in the law for this crackpot theory If you could actually understand what you read, you'd realize this, but you are plainly an illiterate boob..
Comment posted September 12, 2009 @ 6:39 am
I can't understand why she hasn't been hit with Rule 11 sanctions yet.
Comment posted September 12, 2009 @ 6:52 am
I just read the whole transcript, too. OMG! I started laughing so hard I got the hiccups! Taitz is UNBELIEVABLY clueless. Newsflash, birthers: you darling Orly is a M-O-R-O-N.
Comment posted September 13, 2009 @ 4:58 am
American citizenship is determined by the United States rules not British rules.
Read Sec. 301. [8 U.S.C. 1401]
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:…
And Sec. 301. [8 U.S.C. 1409]
… a person born, after December 23, 1952, outside the United States and out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother, if the mother had the nationality of the United States at the time of such person’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.
Comment posted September 13, 2009 @ 5:48 am
BTW, the War of 1812 was fought over the British claim to Americans as British subjects.
In essence, the U.S. answer was, “Get Bushed”.
Pity that after two centuries of independence, someone would want to surrender Americans to British control.
Comment posted September 13, 2009 @ 9:51 pm
Do you people think Obama walks on water.? No he is so full of hot air he floats through it. This guy can't even make a speach on his own. To me he belongs in Indonesia. Maybe he can help those people out. We do not need his help. He has broke our country. After hee sees the world he will be glad to do to return to somewhere. God forbid let him leave here and take his mother in law with him. Please don't leave Michell here either. Take em all with you Mr. Prez for now.People don't let Mrs, Orly Taitz fool you. She is not!!!!! Wait you will see. I have seen her inaction.
Comment posted September 14, 2009 @ 3:20 am
At least homemaker is honest. They don't like Obama and isn't trying to make up some story to hide that fact. The underlying feeling produced the “He has broke our country” statement, which of course ignores the timing of the stock market bust, the financial melt down, the war spending, the automobile company problems, etc. All of those happened before the inauguration.
As to letting Mrs. Orly Taitz fool me? I honestly hope that she doesn't fool anyone.
Homemaker has seen her inaction? Hmmm? The transcript and quotation presented shows her attention to detail.
Comment posted September 15, 2009 @ 9:07 am
You f++++ totally ignore the fact the POTUS is the grandchild of a couple from Kansas. His grandfather fought in WWII and his grandmother worked in the ammo factories to keep our troops supplied. She had to raise President Obama's mother alone for six years while her husband was off to war while working in a factory. The only thing you can see is the black part of him which proves that your biggest objection is racial and you don't any of you have the gumption to stand up and say that. You keep trying to go to some stupid British law that has absolutely NOTHING to do with OUR law and Constitution. The POTUS is the son of an American woman, born on American soil and is therefore a natural born citizen and a citizen of the United States., The only way any of what his father and/or stepfather might have done while he was a minor would be if , at the time of reaching majority, President Obama would have declared dual citizenship and he didn't. No parent, stepparent, grandparent can do anything to remove the citizenship of a child duly born in the United States. Period. End of story. Give it up. Barack Obama is the duly elected President of the United States and you can take that to the bank.
Comment posted September 15, 2009 @ 9:15 am
The only thing that fool woman is doing is stirring up malcontents with her stupid lawsuits. She is obviously an idiot and she should go back where she came from. I would think that sedition is a deportation offense. I hope the Justice Department will take that up after the judges finally quit giving her a forum for her racist views. She is definitely guilty of sedition.
Comment posted September 16, 2009 @ 8:35 pm
Oily Taint fails again.
Nice to have both a seditious soldier and the Head Birther Loon put on notice.
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/breaking_ne…
Good consistent string of O-fers for her crazy legal mockeries too. Let's hope the trend continues.
As for anything Obama has done to “break our country” I would like to thank him for AT LEAST showing us who the true enemies of freedom are: the racists and demagogues who refuse to respect the results of an election. The people have chosen and you folks are talking secession and violent revolution. Congrats, you've outted yourselves as un-American.
Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 2:38 pm
Believe me, we have all seen Taitz'z “inaction.” If you think that she is anything close to a competent lawyer, I offer you my sincerest condolences on the loss of your last remaining brain cell.
Comment posted August 12, 2010 @ 5:56 am
There is a difference between a “motion” and “pro hac vice”. Pro hac vice is an application to be allowed to participate in proceedings and there is a fee involved. It looks to me like she was asking the judge to allow her to do it pro bono. The issue with the motion looks like something entirely different taken out of context.
It's very underhanded to present something dishonestly don't you know.
Comment posted May 17, 2011 @ 7:26 am
I like it very much, thank you
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
Comment posted May 17, 2011 @ 7:26 am
I like it very much, thank you cheap custom jerseys
Comment posted May 17, 2011 @ 7:26 am
I like it very much, thank you cheap custom jerseys
Comment posted May 17, 2011 @ 7:27 am
cheap custom jerseys
custom hockey jerseys
custom baseball jerseys
custom basketball jerseys
custom nfl jerseys
custom football jerseys
custom jerseys
cheap custom jerseys
customized jerseys cheap
customized jerseys
cheap customized nfl jerseys
cheap customized sports jerseys
cheap customized jerseys
nfl custom jerseys
cheap jerseys
Comment posted May 17, 2011 @ 7:27 am
cheap custom jerseys
custom hockey jerseys
custom baseball jerseys
custom basketball jerseys
custom nfl jerseys
custom football jerseys
custom jerseys
cheap custom jerseys
customized jerseys cheap
customized jerseys
cheap customized nfl jerseys
cheap customized sports jerseys
cheap customized jerseys
nfl custom jerseys
cheap jerseys
Trackback posted August 22, 2011 @ 5:06 am
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…
Trackback posted August 22, 2011 @ 4:10 pm
Immigration…
[...]we like to honor other sites on the web, even if they aren’t related to us, by linking to them. Below are some sites worth checking out[...]…
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 12:18 am
hat cookie cutter…
[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]…
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 3:37 pm
heys usa sidewinder…
[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]…
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 9:44 am
Investing for Beginners…
Best info thought we could put several unrelated posts, nevertheless really worthwhile having a look…
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 10:20 am
The Best Cat Suits For Women…
[...]what follows are some references to web pages I always link to since we feel they really are worthy of checking out[...]…
Comment posted September 5, 2011 @ 10:45 am
Tartarus yea, i wish compose affair have a regard for this limit didnt be under the necessity unoccupied, may i repost this There’s A part Relating to Orly | The Washington
Trackback posted September 7, 2011 @ 4:07 am
Netflix…
[...]these are a handful of links to webpages which we connect to seeing that we feel they really are well worth browsing[...]…
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss