Immigration a Tough Issue for Both Parties

By
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 at 3:56 pm

The changing demographics of the United States suggest that there would be a lot of support for comprehensive immigration reform that includes legalization of undocumented immigrants who pay a fine and pay their taxes. But both parties have failed to present a comprehensive immigration bill so far and risk losing the support of a key swing voter group: Latinos.

That was the overall message of a panel of immigration experts, pollsters and advocates who convened for a lunchtime talk on the subject at the Center for American Progress today.

On one hand, as CAP fellow Ruy Teixeira pointed out (and has shown in a recent study), the growing Latino population, the aging of white conservatives and the increasing political role of the Millennial Generation (born between 1978 and 2000) suggests that the culture wars should become a thing of the past — and so should the opportunity for conservatives to use immigration as a wedge issue.

But it’s not so easy. In recent elections, conservative Republicans have continued to use fears of immigration to galvanize voters against Democrats, though they were rarely successful, noted Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America’s Voice. Still, both Democrats and Republicans this year haven’t been willing to advance an immigration reform bill, and President Obama, despite election promises to Latino voters to advocate for reform in his first year in office, has admitted that’s not going to happen. And experts say it will only be more difficult as midterm elections approach.

“If immigration reform doesn’t get approved, it will it become a wedge issue,” predicted Anna Navarro, national co-chair of John McCain’s Hispanic Advisory Council and the lone Republican on the panel. “It will make a comeback. Not anti- and pro-, but rather, ‘you promised, and you didn’t deliver.’ It would be a good issue for Republicans.”

Perhaps, but it won’t lead to “a rush to the Republican party,” predicted Sharry. Still, it could dramatically reduce turnout among Latinos for Democrats in future elections.

Republicans are still identified as the restrictionists, though, said E.J. Dionne, columnist for The Washington Post. “As long as the loudest Republican voters are identified as restrictionist, the message Latinos get is that the Republican party is broadly hostile to them.”

But Democrats themselves are split on the issue, between more conservative Democrats and business groups who favor a large guest worker program, and more liberal Democrats and labor advocates who say that undermines American workers, and the answer is to create a path to citizenship.

“This is a very hard task,” said Dionne. “It’s not simply a matter of guts; it takes a lot of political and policy intelligence to put this thing together.”

Ultimately, all sides agreed that both parties need to unite behind bipartisan leadership and come to an agreement on this issue, or risk losing supporters.

“I think Republicans are waiting for this White House and this Congress to lead,” said Navarro. “The best thing Republicans can do is come up with an agreement and get rid of the issue once and for all. Get rid of the issue, and go back to what Ronald Reagan believed: that Latinos are Republicans, they just don’t know it yet.”

Comments

5 Comments

The Washington Independent » Immigration a Tough Issue for Both … | immigration wish
Pingback posted August 25, 2009 @ 7:23 pm

[...] is the original post:  The Washington Independent » Immigration a Tough Issue for Both … Share and [...]


AJF7688 Blog - The Washington Independent » Immigration a Tough Issue for Both …
Pingback posted August 25, 2009 @ 9:49 pm

[...] More:  The Washington Independent » Immigration a Tough Issue for Both … [...]


The Washington Independent » Immigration a Tough Issue for Both … « Immigration
Pingback posted August 25, 2009 @ 10:40 pm

[...] Mo­­re here: T­h­e Wash­in­­gt­on­­ In­­d­epen­­… [...]


Immigrants’ Advocates Not Letting Up on Obama | The Lie Politic
Pingback posted August 28, 2009 @ 4:49 am

[...] Immigration experts say the continued crackdown on enforcement without providing an opportunity for legalization of otherwise law-abiding immigrants could dampen Latino voters’ initial enthusiasm for Obama, as well as for other Democrats in the next round of elections. [...]


Adam
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 8:21 pm

The Democrats–like the British Labour, and the Canadian and Australian Liberals–have ties to the construction and real estate sectors. These businesses require constant population growth, to justify homebuilding and associated infrastructure (roads, schools). These are the people pushing for mass immigration.

There is no dancing around the issue: population growth is the cause of urban sprawl, loss of farmlnad and wild areas, and stress on freshwater supplies. The single preventable cause of population growth in developed countries is mass immigration. Environmentalists have completely sold their souls on this issue. The Sierra Club accepted a nearly $100M bribe (from David Gelbaum) to NOT discuss overpopulation and immigration. Canada's David Suzuki Foundation is funded by the large banks BMO-Financial and CIBC, who have lobbied to nearly DOUBLE immigration levels (from 250k to 400k per year). Independant environmentalists are afraid to be called racists, since most immigrants are People of Color.

The politically-incorrect truth is that Latin Americans, North Africans, East and South Asians, and other people from the developing world DO have too many kids. Much of this is cultural. Additionally, these societies didn't go through all the social changes wrought by WW I-II's total war economy: women entering the workforce and delaying childbirth. Whatever the reasons, it's not up to the developed world to save 3rd worlders from their own incontinent fecundity. We have to be more Yetzer Hara about this and worry about OUR environmental, food security and cultural needs.

A democratic, civil society requires ethnically-coherent nation states. Having a large 'minority' that can't function in the majority language (Hispanics, East Asians), or with radically-different cultural values (Muslims, Sikhs) isn't conducive to long-term political stability. Hispanics in the U.S. and Han Chinese in Canada expect everything from Police to ATMs to offer service in Spanish and Mandarin; they never bother learning English. Rotten Muslim and Sikh values regarding women are creeping into North America–just look at cases of 'honor killings' and female genital mutilllation that are making the headlines.

Our physical and cultural survival depends on two things, vis a vis immigration: assimilating (culturally and linguistically) the legal immigrants we've got, as well as halting further mass immigration. 3rd world family-planing initiatives, cancelled under Bush and Reagan Administrations, should also be aggressively restarted.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.