Krauthammer Debunks ‘Death Panel’ Claim
Friday, August 21, 2009 at 10:58 am
Suggesting that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin “leave the room” in the debate over end-of-life counseling, conservative Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer today takes on the accusation that the Democrats’ strategy for health reform would create government-backed committees to euthanize seniors, as Palin has charged.
[T]here are no “death panels” in the Democratic health-care bills, and to say that there are is to debase the debate.
With his comments, Krauthammer joins an ever-growing list of conservative commentators and health policy experts who’ve blasted the “death panel” claims as inaccurate, malicious or both.
What the Democrats bill does — and what some Republicans have supported in the past — is to have Medicare pay doctors for late-life decision-making services when patients request such counseling. That means it’s exactly 100 percent voluntary.
Krauthammer doesn’t like the idea, arguing that the effect of the “chats” will be “to gently point the patient” toward choosing death over the expensive treatments that might prolong life for just a few months.
[W]hy get Medicare to pay the doctor to do the counseling? Because we know that if this white-coated authority whose chosen vocation is curing and healing is the one opening your mind to hospice and palliative care, we’ve nudged you ever so slightly toward letting go.
This is an odd remark, which seems (1) to question the wisdom of the doctors who do this counseling, (2) to toss doctors into the same mythical category of government bureaucrats hell-bent on killing off seniors to save costs, and (3) to doubt the ability of patients to make their own decisions based on the advice they’re given.
Still, Krauthammer, who is a psychiatrist, adds that the proposal is “not an outrage,” and “it’s surely not a death panel.”
It’s safe, at this point, to place those claiming otherwise squarely in the category of folks trying to kill health care reform, rather than debate it.
14 Comments
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
“Because we know that if this white-coated authority whose chosen vocation is curing and healing is the one opening your mind to hospice and palliative care, we’ve nudged you ever so slightly toward letting go.”
Marginally less dishonest. I guess that's about as good as it's going to get with conservatives and healthcare.
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 3:47 pm
There will be a panel. It may not be the doctor patient end of life review that you mentioned but there clearly will be a panel that decides in general terms what the public system will pay for and what it will not. there has to be a panel or some mechanism to do it. If Sarah Palin is referring to that as a Death Panel it is a bit of Marketing that may be a reach but then most politicians seem to be reaching.
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 7:52 pm
Just as there is a panel that decide what the insurance company will pay for. Srah was not refering to that panel, she was referring to the made up imaginary panel the Charlie C. is at pains to dismuss.
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 7:57 pm
Someone with more patience than I could maybe explain how this jibes with “OMG costs are going to get out of control” when in fact the kind of greedy, rapacious doctor that other conservatives are telling us to fear would advise expensive, ultimately futile, care.
I can't do it; I've personally given up on trying to unravel their contradictions. I quit after “It'll be incredibly expensive! It'll be so cheap that private companies can't compete! And that's a bad thing somehow!” gave me whiplash.
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 8:00 pm
But there will be a panel. Maybe Sarah Palin did not link to the panel correctly but what does that matter. So you get to the panel another way. There is a panel. Has to be. So Charles Krauthammer, who I think is brilliant and often correct, is attacking the existence of a panel that has to exist.
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 9:14 pm
Why would he say that doctors who have sworn to do everything in their power to save lives would encourage people toward euthanasia? If anything, the opposite would appear to be more likely. And more likely still would be that doctors would try to stay above the fray by informing their patients of the various options and letting them choose for themselves, having been apprised of the fact that living wills can be changed whenever desired as long as the patient is still mentally competent- which is of course the only time a living will can be created. If it falls onto relatives who can only guess what outcome their loved one would have chosen, then it's already too late- as the Terry Shiavo tragedy will remind us.
Pingback posted August 22, 2009 @ 2:42 am
[...] The Washington Independent » Krauthammer Debunks ‘Death Panel’ Claim washingtonindependent.com/55914/krauthammer-debunks-death-panel-claim – view page – cached #The Washington Independent RSS Feed The Washington Independent » Krauthammer Debunks ‘Death Panel’ Claim Comments Feed The Washington Independent Biden Time Vote Fraud LOL — From the page [...]
Comment posted August 22, 2009 @ 3:04 am
This is how they plan to bend the curve, as Emmanuel has pointed out, with 600 million dollars in saving for South Florida alone, didn't the President say, take the painkiller for the operation
Pingback posted September 1, 2009 @ 6:09 am
[...] Charles Krauthammer to the list of conservatives who are debunking the death panel lie. Now if only some elected officials (Chuck Grassley) would do the [...]
Trackback posted July 22, 2010 @ 8:00 am
Panel to Vote on FDA Proposal on Painkiller Abuse…
WASHINGTON — An advisory panel to the FDA will meet this week to vote on whether to adopt a new risk-reduction strategy for long-acting opioid-based painkillers, the use — and misuse — of which have exploded in recent years. The FDA has p……
Trackback posted March 24, 2011 @ 5:33 pm
Better website?…
Hey this can be a real cool website…
Trackback posted April 12, 2011 @ 3:39 pm
You have chek this website out….
Hey I discovered this web site to be really interesting! Bookmarked!…
Comment posted May 10, 2011 @ 7:19 am
This initial offer is usually far below what would be assessed by the Injuries Board Ireland, and although a better settlement of whiplash injury compensation can be agreed by negotiation, this is best left to an experienced personal injuries solicitor.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss