Obama Defies Federal Courts in Holding Yemeni Detainees

By
Friday, August 21, 2009 at 6:00 am
Donald Rumsfeld called the Gitmo detainees "the worst of the worst." (Wikimedia Commons)

Donald Rumsfeld called the Gitmo detainees "the worst of the worst." (Wikimedia Commons)

On Monday a federal court judge ordered the Department of Defense to release a 47-year-old father of two with a heart condition who it has imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay for the past seven years without justification. But like the other Yemeni men cleared for release but still held at the detention facility, it’s not clear when or even if Mohammed al-Adahi will get to go free.

Illustration by: Matt Mahurin

Illustration by: Matt Mahurin

Obama administration officials on Wednesday boasted that they’d secured agreements from six European countries to accept Guantanamo detainees, although the United States itself has still refused to free any Guantanamo prisoners on U.S. soil. But since President Obama’s inauguration in January, the administration has not released a single prisoner to Yemen, although that country is willing to have them back and many would be happy to go there. (Some prisoners from other countries, such as the Uighurs from China, cannot be returned to their home countries for fear of persecution.) The administration has not stated its reasons, but said only that the State Department is negotiating with the Yemeni government over the prisoners’ return. At least three Yemeni prisoners since April have won their petitions for habeas corpus in federal court — meaning a judge has ordered that the government must let them go. (The government has cleared for release an unknown number of others.) So far, though, the Obama administration has not complied with those court rulings.

The United States has long been reluctant to return Guantanamo detainees to Yemen, where al-Qaeda is believed to be active. As a result, of about 550 prisoners released from Guantanamo by Bush officials, only 14 were from Yemen. But that trickle has slowed to a complete halt under the Obama administration, despite court rulings that the government hasn’t shown the men have done anything wrong or present any security risk.

Nearly 100 of the remaining 223 detainees at Guantanamo Bay are from Yemen. A government official on Wednesday said that negotiations are ongoing. Now that two U.S. federal courts have ordered at least three Yemeni prisoners freed, however, it’s not clear under what power the United States can continue to hold them.

“We appreciate that the United States has security concerns about Yemen, but continuing to hold these men without charge is morally wrong, is in violation of court orders, and it’s handing al-Qaeda a recruiting tool,” said Letta Taylor, a researcher for Human Rights Watch who wrote a report on the Yemeni detainees’ situation in March. “It creates its own sets of risks.”

The standoff between the court and the president in the Yemeni prisoner cases is another example of the executive branch ignoring the orders of the federal judiciary. In previous court cases, the government has refused to turn over evidence that it deemed a “state secret,” for example, even after a federal judge ordered the evidence be disclosed.

“The way our system is supposed to work is that if a federal district court orders that a branch of the government do something, they’re supposed to do it,” said John Chandler, a lawyer in Atlanta who represents al-Adahi in his court case and won his order of release on Monday. “I have every hope that they will. But they haven’t done anything yet. And he’s not the first one to be ordered released.”

In April, Judge Ellen Huvelle granted the habeas corpus petition of Yasin Muhammed Basardah, a Yemeni who was known to have provided information — often found to be unreliable — against other Guantanamo detainees. As a result, he faces security risks wherever he’s released.

And in May, Judge Gladys Kessler ordered the release of Alla Ali Bin Ali Ahmed, a Yemeni man arrested seven years ago as a teenager. The Pentagon claimed he was a terrorist based largely on statements from other Guantanamo prisoners whose testimony the judge deemed unreliable, as well as bits and pieces of other circumstantial evidence that Judge Kessler found were too “weak and attenuated” to support his continued detention.
Despite the federal court orders to release them, both men are still at Guantanamo Bay. And many more Yemenis have been cleared for release by the U.S. government, although in a strange twist, the government refuses to say how many and their lawyers are forbidden from divulging this information to the media. Among them is a 38-year-old orthopedic surgeon captured in Afghanistan in January 2002, who the Justice Department announced in March that it had cleared for release. Two more Yemeni prisoners at Guantanamo apparently committed suicide, according to the government.

“The government is designating the very fact of approval for transfer ‘protected’ information, meaning it can’t be disclosed to anyone who has not committed to obeying the protective order – which in turn prohibits the disclosure of ‘protected’ information,” explained David Remes, Executive Director of the nonprofit group Appeal for Justice, and a lawyer representing more than a dozen detainees from Yemen. “All of us are fighting that ["protected"] designation in our cases.”

Al-Adahi, who won his order of release on Monday, was captured by Pakistani troops while fleeing Afghanistan after the U.S. invasion. Because he was on a bus that also carried some wounded Taliban soldiers, the Defense Department claimed he was working for the Taliban and sent him to Camp X-Ray at Guantanamo Bay in January 2002.

An oil worker who lived in Yemen, Al-Adahi was originally suspected of acting as Osama bin Laden’s bodyguard, but he has consistently maintained his innocence. In June, he testified to a closed federal courtroom via video camera from Guantanamo, where he was chained to the prison floor and sweating in the Caribbean heat. Al-Adahi talked about his high blood pressure, and Guantanamo officials have confirmed he has heart problems.

According to declassified portions of the transcript, Al-Adahi testified that he was introduced to Osama bin Laden during the summer before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks while he was in Afghanistan, where he was bringing his sister, who the family had arranged to marry a Yemeni man in Kandahar. Bin Laden, then considered the de facto “governor” of Kandahar, was at the wedding celebration. Al-Adahi has consistently maintained that he never worked for bin Laden, and Judge Kessler apparently believed there was insufficient evidence to support the government’s claims. Her written opinion in the case has not yet been declassified, however, so the basis for her findings remain unclear.

“I did not fight the American alliance,” Al-Adahi testified. “I did not deal with Taliban or al-Qaeda. I am a working man in my country. I have never committed a crime.”
The Department of Justice referred questions about the repatriation of Yemeni detainees to the State Department. A State Department spokesman said he cannot comment on the situation of Yemenis who have brought their cases to federal court.

Of the 35 habeas corpus cases heard so far, federal courts have granted the petitions and ordered the release of 29 Guantanamo Bay detainees, finding the government has not produced enough evidence to keep holding them. In addition to the three Yemeni prisoners whose petitions have been granted, the petitions of three others from Yemen have been denied.

Update: Judge Kessler released this unclassified, redacted version of her opinion in the al-Adahi case late on Friday. In the opinion, she says there is no reliable evidence that al-Adahi was ever a member of or fought for al-Qaida or the Taliban, or provided either group any affirmative support.

Comments

19 Comments

Twitter Trackbacks for The Washington Independent » Obama Defies Federal Courts in Holding Yemeni Detainees [washingtonindependent.com] on Topsy.com
Pingback posted August 21, 2009 @ 12:01 pm

[...] The Washington Independent » Obama Defies Federal Courts in Holding Yemeni Detainees washingtonindependent.com/55890/obama-defies-federal-courts-in-holding-yemeni-detainees – view page – cached #The Washington Independent RSS Feed The Washington Independent » Obama Defies Federal Courts in Holding Yemeni Detainees Comments Feed The Washington Independent Biden Time No Wonder the Auto Dealers Are Angry — From the page [...]


Miranda
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 11:08 am

So what is the US Gov't afraid of in the release of these innocent prisoners? Could it be their stories of torture that must be silenced even if by “death by suicide”?


maneeshbhati
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 1:02 pm

thanks for sharing.


tropicgirl
Comment posted August 21, 2009 @ 3:33 pm

And Obama just can't figure out why people dislike him now…

This torture scheme has defiled us and our country. It WILL stop one way or another.


pppoll37
Comment posted August 22, 2009 @ 5:02 pm

Hello mate, I want to thank you for this nice blog. Would you mind telling me some secrets for a succesful blog ? Which could attract some visitors than it normally does. Please come visit my site Chicago Yellow Page Business Directory when you got time.


The Washington Independent » Obama Defies Federal Courts in … « Obamabidenforchange.com
Pingback posted August 23, 2009 @ 6:43 am

[...] Here is the original:  The Washington Independent » Obama Defies Federal Courts in … [...]


Weekly Web Watch 08/17/09 – 08/23/09 « EXECUTIVE WATCH
Pingback posted August 23, 2009 @ 7:57 pm

[...] Eviatar reports that the Obama administration is now holding at least three detainees at Guantanamo in defiance of court orders that they be released.  However, they are now holding at least one with a federal court’s [...]


Name
Comment posted August 24, 2009 @ 4:42 pm

I find it amazing how quickly Americans forget. Many of those who are detained in Guantanamo were captured by the U.S. or its allies immediately following 9/11 when the U.S. went into Afghanistan in search of bin Laden/Al Qaeda and their Taliban supporters. Yes the government has definitely made many mistakes in their handling of this from the beginning, however that does not mean that those people are innocent of any wrongdoing. Like many, I don't condon torture for any reason or under any circumstance, but even if some of those people were tortured; again, it still does not meant they are innocent.


Ima Guest
Comment posted August 24, 2009 @ 5:22 pm

One would have to agree with the flawlless logic of your statement that “even if some of those people were tortured; again, it still does not meant they are innocent”.

Similarly though, just because they were detained doesn't mean they were guilty of anything.

In areas of staggering poverty such as exists in Afghanistan, it would be completely unsurprising if handing out cash payments for information would lead to innocents being (using our government's euphemism here) “detained”.


BEN1234
Comment posted August 25, 2009 @ 4:48 pm

It is unfortunate to observe the government administration have little respect and regard for rule of law. Any thing that happens contrary to the normal procedure at the instance of the government administration is obviously labeled as President Obama's doing. It is time to go into the details of the structure of the making of administration manning of individuals, their legal jurisdiction to recommend to avoid/ manipulate to avoid or even to defy court orders. There can be no document called for by the court to be hood winked by advanceing the reason of national security/ top national secret can not be show or produced before the court.

If the judges of a country are untrustworthy or cannot be trusted with the top national secret documents for personal consultation for the ends of proper justice. Then it definitely needs to be looked into such a justice system if it should continue or a major over haul is needed, empowering judges to consult all types of documents including national top secret documents for equity of justice. Otherwise how can judges come to proper conclusion to take impartial view to pass a verdict.

At the same time how judges can save accused from administrative manipulation facts/evidences and defiance of court verdicts. Defiance of court orders must be dealt with mercilessly.


Obama ignores the courts « Later On
Pingback posted August 26, 2009 @ 3:51 pm

[...] LeisureGuy This seems much more like Bush’s line of country, but I guess Obama likes it, too. Daphne Eviatar in the Washington Independent: On Monday a federal court judge ordered the Department of Defense to release a 47-year-old father [...]


Pre-emptive detention « Nanobots Will Enslave Us All
Pingback posted August 28, 2009 @ 3:38 pm

[...] By nanobotswillenslaveusall From the Washington Independent (via Dispatches From the Culture Wars): On Monday a federal court judge ordered the Department of [...]


johnhkennedy
Comment posted August 30, 2009 @ 1:56 pm

“Obama Defies Federal Courts” Not the “CHANGE” We Voters were promised when WE gave Obama & Democrats Total Power.

KEEP ASKING ALL POLITICIANS AT ALL PUBLIC EVENTS
“WHY DO YOU SUPPORT TORTURE?”
If they aren't actively calling for enforcement of our Federal Torture Laws,
They DO Support Torture.

SIGN THE PETITIONS
Demanding
both a Commission of Inquiry
and prosecution for all those leaders
in Bush's Administration that
Conspired to Torture at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

Only Prosecution Stops Torture!
Only Prosecution Stops Abuse of Power and
of Our Constitution and Rule Of Law


Switzerland May Take Four Gitmo Detainees | GSA Schedule Services
Pingback posted September 21, 2009 @ 9:22 am

[...] of the detainees cleared for release on its own soil, including those that U.S. federal judges have ruled were wrongly imprisoned by the United States for more than seven years. Filed under: Government Spending Leave a comment [...]


adidas originals
Comment posted June 4, 2010 @ 7:55 am

Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.


louis vuitton
Comment posted August 5, 2010 @ 6:06 am

This torture scheme has defiled us and our country. It WILL stop one way or another.


Discount Louis Vuitton
Comment posted August 23, 2010 @ 2:16 am

It is unfortunate to observe the government administration has little respect and regard for rule of law. Any thing that happens contrary to the normal


Check out my facebook profile
Trackback posted March 24, 2011 @ 5:07 pm

You have chek this website out….

Hey I found this website to be actually attention-grabbing! Bookmarked!…


http://beautyxpose.com/2010/features/high-fashion-low-maintenance-nude-shoes.html/
Trackback posted April 12, 2011 @ 3:28 pm

You have chek this website out….

Hey I discovered this website to be really interesting! Bookmarked!…


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.