The Cost of Progress: Mercury in Every Stream and Fish

By
Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 1:54 pm

After eight years researching mercury levels in the nation’s streams, scientists at the United States Geological Survey unveiled some bad news yesterday: Every fish taken from nearly 300 streams between 1998 and 2005 tested positive for Mercury, a neurotoxin, with 27 percent containing levels deemed unfit for human consumption. The Associated Press lays out both the dangers, and the sources of contamination:

Mercury consumed by eating fish can damage the nervous system and cause learning disabilities in developing fetuses and young children. The main source of mercury to most of the streams tested, according to the researchers, is emissions from coal-fired power plants. The mercury released from smokestacks here and abroad rains down into waterways, where natural processes convert it into methylmercury — a form that allows the toxin to wind its way up the food chain into fish.

The study provides yet another boost for legislation to move the country away from its heavy reliance on dirty fuels like coal. But not everyone has greeted the news with alarm. The Center for Consumer Freedom, a group backed by the food and restaurant industry, shot out a statement yesterday disputing the findings, arguing that the mercury levels reported by USGS are no cause for concern.

“There’s nothing new about tiny traces of mercury in fish,” David Martosko, the group’s director of research, said in a statement. “[I]t’s been there since the first ocean creatures evolved.”

Comments

6 Comments

The Washington Independent » The Cost of Progress: Mercury in … | planets
Pingback posted August 20, 2009 @ 5:24 pm

[...] Read more here: The Washington Independent » The Cost of Progress: Mercury in … [...]


sdf
Comment posted August 20, 2009 @ 6:16 pm

Do you read the label on a light bulb before you buy it? You should. Those “so called” green light bulbs made by GE contatin mercury, which when YOU through them away, go to landfills and now into those fish. But those light bulbs are not being recalled and no one is called for the manufacturing of them to stop. Way to go green!!!!!


strangely_enough
Comment posted August 20, 2009 @ 6:42 pm

If you are eating your light bulbs, you're doing something wrong…


Irish_Wake
Comment posted August 20, 2009 @ 7:13 pm

Do you read the label on a light bulb before you buy it? You should. Those “so called” green light bulbs made by GE contatin mercury, which can be recycled when disposed of per the label instructions.


ajm8127
Comment posted August 20, 2009 @ 8:30 pm

All fluorescent lamps contain a tiny bit of mercury. Thats why you are not supposed to throw them in the garbage. From GE's site:

http://www.gelighting.com/na/home_lighting/ask_…

You cannot blame manufacturers or CFLs for the lack of responsibility of consumers. Truth is, I think all fluorescent lamps should be mandatory recycle items, but I guess that idea is socialism. I am sure some would argue that the market is the best force to control environmental protection, but thats a different topic entirely.


» The Washington Independent » The Cost of Progress: Mercury in …
Pingback posted August 21, 2009 @ 2:26 am

[...] Excerpt from: The Washington Independent » The Cost of Progress: Mercury in … [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.