rssWhatever Happened to That New Justice Department Policy on ‘State Secrets’?
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 at 8:58 am
- 4 Comments
After my post yesterday updating the status of the Obama administration’s ongoing efforts to conceal evidence that British resident and former Guantanamo Bay prisoner Binyam Mohamed was tortured, Ed Brayton, a fellow with the Center for Independent Media and author of the blog Dispatches from the Culture Wars, asked me whatever happened to that promise from Attorney General Eric Holder to issue a new government policy on the use of the “state secrets” privilege?
The state secrets privilege, of course, is what the government invokes when it wants a judge to dismiss a lawsuit that it claims will reveal “state secrets” just by going forward, even if the judge is the only person who gets to see the sensitive secret evidence. The government invoked “state secrets” in the case of Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, and several other cases involving torture and warrantless wiretapping that the Justice Department wants dismissed. Pending legislation would limit the executive’s ability to use this confidential evidentiary privilege to dismiss outright legal challenges to government conduct. The administration so far has avoided taking a position on the legislation.
As I reported almost two months ago, Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 17 that he would issue a new policy on when the government will invoke the state secrets privilege to conceal evidence from the public — and even from federal court judges — “in a matter of days.”
Well, it’s August, and still nothing. After Ed asked me the question, I followed up with Dean Boyd, spokesman for the Justice Department’s national security division, asking him if that policy had ever been issued. After all, maybe we’d just missed it.
Boyd’s response: “Not yet; still in the works.”
4 Comments
Comment posted August 11, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
Holder doesn't seem interested in committing himself on any of the Bush-Cheney abuses. Would have thought if Obama really wanted change he would have appointed someone as AG that had more guts.
SIGN THE PETITIONS
Demanding
both a Commission of Inquiry
and a Special Prosecutor
For All Their Crimes
at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG
Comment posted August 12, 2009 @ 3:03 am
Asserting “State Secrets” is merely a ploy to evade criminal responsibility and the attendant negative publicity.
The Feds have no credibility whatsoever. Holder may be a good start, but it will take years to finish flushing the sewage from the system.
“State CYA” would be far more accurate.
Comment posted August 14, 2009 @ 5:48 pm
Yeah, where is it?
I hope Obama gives us the change we wanted from Bush-Cheney policies.
Keep up the pressure for investigation
and prosecution.
Keep asking ALL politicians at ALL public events
“Why do they support Torture?”
If they aren't actively calling for enforcement
of our Federal Torture Laws,
They Do Support Torture.
AND
SIGN THE PETITIONS
Demanding
both a Commission of Inquiry
and a Special Prosecutor
For All Their Crimes
at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG
Over 250,000 signed
Add your Signature Today
Only Prosecution Stops Torture!
Only Prosecution Stops Abuses of Our Constitution and Rights.
Comment posted August 19, 2009 @ 1:25 pm
Only One word to characterize such a great post “WOW” that was a very interesting read
a href=”http://www.victoriaclassic.com”>Links of London Jewellery
Everything dynamic and very positively!
a href=”http://www.victoriaclassic.com”>Links of London Jewellery
I think I will try to recommend this post to my friends and family, cuz it’s really helpful.
a href=”http://www.victoriaclassic.com”>Links of London Jewellery
Just wanted to say great job with the blog, today is my first visit here and I’ve enjoyed reading your posts so far
a href=”http://www.victoriaclassic.com”>Links of London Jewellery
Thanks for article. Everytime like to read you.
a href=”http://www.victoriaclassic.com”>Links of London Jewellery
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
