Comments on: Emerging GOP Line: Don’t ‘Rumsfeld’ Afghanistan

By: chenlifeng0810

chenlifeng0810 — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:33:52 +0000

Only One word to characterize such a great post “WOW” that was a very interesting read
a href="http://www.victoriaclassic.com">Links of London Jewellery

Everything dynamic and very positively!
a href="http://www.victoriaclassic.com">Links of London Jewellery

I think I will try to recommend this post to my friends and family, cuz it’s really helpful.
a href="http://www.victoriaclassic.com">Links of London Jewellery

Just wanted to say great job with the blog, today is my first visit here and I’ve enjoyed reading your posts so far
a href="http://www.victoriaclassic.com">Links of London Jewellery

Thanks for article. Everytime like to read you.
a href="http://www.victoriaclassic.com">Links of London Jewellery

By: Yahya

Yahya — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:01:24 +0000

Just compare the number of troops in Afghanistan during the last 8 years with the number of “ennemy initiated attacks” and you will understand what is the cause of what.

The “light footprint” Rumsfeld's theory was making sense. In 2001, there were five specialists of Afghanistan in Washington. Then you got hundreds of “experts”, you got self-confidence, you got regional ambition, you created PRTs and you brought the NATO “machin” to the country! Now, you are done: you need more and more troops to hold and hold again! Is the goal a “held country”?

By: JRome

JRome — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:28:52 +0000

Keep in mind. IF it stink it from the back side of the GOP's Elephant. ? TO BE RUMMED ? I'm not sure. Is it a NEW tes bag?, assthrowturf? As long as they con keep it up we can (;>).

wit loVe J Rome

By: JRome

JRome — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:22:43 +0000

TO THE GOP, IF IT STINKS SAY IT.