Is This the Source of the Forged ‘Kenyan Birth Certificate?’
Monday, August 03, 2009 at 7:34 pm
[Update: Credit where it's due—my source tipped me off to this in the Politijab web forums, which have become a good site for "birther" debunking.]
One of my friends in the small community of Obama “birther”-debunkers passes on quite the discovery: a 1964 “certified copy of registration of birth” from Australia, easily available on Bomford.net, a genealogy site. There are striking similarities between this document and the one Orly Taitz is passing off as a “Kenyan birth certificate” for Barack Obama.
- The design is identical, down to the seal at the top and the classifications (“Christian name,” etc) used for identifying the baby.
- The “registrar” on the Bomford document is G.F. Lavender. On the Taitz document, it’s E.F. Lavender.
- The “district registrar” on the Bomford document is J.H. Miller. On the Taitz document, it’s M.H. Miller.
![]()
![]()
- The number of the book is identical on both documents: Book 44B, Page 5733.
What’s more likely — that two Kenyan bureaucrats shared last names with two Australian bureaucrats, and that the numbers on both certificates were identical? Or that someone used this document, available online for anyone who wanted to look, to forge the Obama “certificate?”
Update: As a commenter points out, the Bomford.net site is down. Here is the original image, from that site:

And here is the Taitz document:

Follow David Weigel on Twitter
3,588 Comments
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 9:32 pm
[...] A possible source of the Kenyan birth certificate… Kenyan Certificate: Fake Obama Kenya birth certificate An Australian Certificate: http://www.bomford.net/worcestershir…hCertDoc65.jpg …many similarities. News Source: The Washington Independent Is This the Source of the Forged ‘Kenyan Birth Certificate?’ [...]
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 9:34 pm
[...] # 2: It appears that this whole damn thing is a bogus fraud. The Washington Independent has the scoop. (H/T AllahPundit): One of my friends in the small community of Obama [...]
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 10:19 pm
[...] Update: Thanks to more comments on TRSOL, the WashingtonIndependent site takes note: [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:55 am
“under Hawaiian Law in 1961 you could be born on MARS and get a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth,”
Yes, but it would say you were born on MARS.
Epic Fail.
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 10:59 pm
[...] Weigel points to a document which looks like it may be the template that was used to create the Obama document: – The design is identical, down to the seal at the top and the classifications (”Christian [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:02 am
Apologies. I clicked the link and it didn’t work — something related to my browser, I think. I have resolved it and now see the link.
The other poster (going by the legitimate-sounding moniker “A”) just directs people to politijab dot com. No specific page. So I doubted that there’s any real motive besides driving traffic to your chosen website.
The other times I have looked at posts like yours, it’s a trick to get me to look at porn that isn’t worth a free look or some such thing.
Thanks for the concern, but I’m certain that my dusty old dictionary is still serving me faithfully. I just this minute got accused by a doofus on this thread of winning a spelling bee as a child.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:15 am
Apologies, as noted above.
You speak truth to delusional birthers?
So do I. I just don’t bother to sugar-coat that truth for those racist xenophobic lying cowards who won’t stop hiding behind this nonsense about a birth certificate.
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 11:28 pm
[...] Office” on August 5, 1961, a Saturday when the office would have been closed. Late Monday evening, TWI reported that the certificate had significant similarities to an unrelated Australian birth certificate, [...]
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 11:36 pm
[...] Great Source for Birth Certificates Published August 3, 2009 Media Leave a Comment Tags: Birthers Just in case you can’t find your original copy. [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:40 am
How would he not be qualified if born in the US?
He’s old enough.
Please site what would disqualify him.
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 11:43 pm
[...] [...]
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 11:48 pm
[...] It was Australian. God I love the internets. [...]
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 11:50 pm
[...] It was Australian. God I love the internets. [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:54 am
Because he’s shown us the birth certificate; the rest you’re asking for is irrelevant. Who cares what his high school records say? Is there any doubt that he was going to school in Hawaii as a teenager? Law office records are privileged, lawyers show them to no one.
I really don’t understand this mania about Obama’s papers.
Pingback posted August 3, 2009 @ 11:59 pm
[...] The rest is here: Is This the Source of the Forged #39;Kenyan Birth Certificate?#39; | The b…/b [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:00 am
What makes you think that? The “certificate of live birth” that has been presented makes no statement as to “WHERE” the birth took place.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:01 am
You’re right, he’s not an American citizen. He’s United States citizen. America is a continent.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:13 am
[...] [...]
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:19 am
[...] looks as though David Weigel at Washington Independent has found the source of the so-called “Kenyan birth certificate” that Orly Taitz is [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:31 am
“Obama HATES America in it’s traditional form”
That comment pretty much says it all. Define traditional form. Pre-civil war America? America as an agrarian society? The era of McCarthyism? Pre-civil rights movement deep southern society?
Or simply maintaining the status quo and perpetuating the mindset that it’s a “white man’s world”?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:31 am
“Obama HATES America in it’s traditional form”
That comment pretty much says it all. Define traditional form. Pre-civil war America? America as an agrarian society? The era of McCarthyism? Pre-civil rights movement deep southern society?
Or simply maintaining the status quo and perpetuating the mindset that it’s a “white man’s world”?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:33 am
Eugenia, that is the wrong response to this gentleman. The correct response is, “Shut the fuck up, LoneWacko*!”
*That is his real moniker.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:33 am
Eugenia, that is the wrong response to this gentleman. The correct response is, “Shut the fuck up, LoneWacko*!”
*That is his real moniker.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 am
Dufus.
The Annenbergs were conservatives w/respect to their political ties, but they set up the Annenberg Foundation as a philanthropic organization to provide funding for public school education throughout the nation. It was in this scenario that they have a connection to Obama. He was a member of a community group working toward providing educational resources to inner city schools in Chicago.
“Guilt by association” is a very easy, yet extremely malicious and disingenuous game to play. Palin learned that lesson the hard way with her fear and hate-mongering “palling around with terrorists” remarks that caused her to lose favor with the majority of American voters.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 am
Dufus.
The Annenbergs were conservatives w/respect to their political ties, but they set up the Annenberg Foundation as a philanthropic organization to provide funding for public school education throughout the nation. It was in this scenario that they have a connection to Obama. He was a member of a community group working toward providing educational resources to inner city schools in Chicago.
“Guilt by association” is a very easy, yet extremely malicious and disingenuous game to play. Palin learned that lesson the hard way with her fear and hate-mongering “palling around with terrorists” remarks that caused her to lose favor with the majority of American voters.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:45 am
[...] It was Australian. God I love the internets. [...]
Comment posted August 3, 2009 @ 11:48 pm
Did you click the link zax? That they tried to pass that kenyan nonsense off as legit is indeed a joke.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:01 am
It didn't have pretty pictures. Zax can't read, apparently. Must be a birther.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:11 am
So you are saying that just as porkpie Gibbs and other flaks decided to talk about the “birther” issue because even that is more comfortable than talking about Obama's lies, dropping polls, and failed policies, they then created a fake Kenyan birth certificate?
To deflect attention from the fact that we still have not seen his transcripts, client lists, passports,or American birth certificate?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:12 am
“7s 6d No. 495″ is identical on both as well. Date of Registration and Date Entered are 4 days apart on both.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:20 am
So… are we now saying that is Obama actually Australian?
My head hurts. =D
This whole story needs to die.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:23 am
No, we're saying you've SEEN his American [sic] birth certificate. It's the one from Hawaii Elmer. “America” doesn't issue birth certificates (your nutty friend from Delaware notwithstanding). States issue them. Hawaii issued one to Barack Obama when he was born there. They have confirmed this. They have *repeatedly* stated that he was born there and is, therefore, a Natural Born Citizen, and thanks to our Constitution, they get to make that determination.
And you have absolutely NO reason to, or need to, see his transcripts, client lists, passport, etc. I'm pretty sure you weren't clamoring to see George W. Bush's National Guard records when THEY went missing, were you? Didn't think so. So you can STFU now about the President's transcripts, client lists (seriously? His CLIENT LISTS? WTF??) etc.
Now, if you'd like to try facts for a change, feel free to post some of these “lies” and “failed policies” you prattle on about. In 6 months it's pretty hard to say a policy is “failed.” We're pretty sure about the ones from the past 8 years though.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:26 am
Not too convincing. Australia and Kenya were both Commonwealth nations and inherited a lot of forms from their colonial days. But really, it's so easy to forge a birth record that I'm going to believe the Hawaii births registrar when she says the Hawaii certificate is the real deal, not some completely unvetted Kenyan document. After all, I just “proved” (follow my link above) that Obama was born in a foreign country called “Louisiana” to two parents also born there and should thus be deported, see how easy it is with a bit of Photoshop? :)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:27 am
Brilliant find! That's pretty obviously the source doc.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:28 am
[...] the rest here: The Washington Independent » Is This the Source of the Forged … Tags: document, fact, forge-the-obama, Technology, though-not [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:32 am
Busted!
Poor Orly. Hope she enjoys her vacation in Israel.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:37 am
“So far, Congress has not passed
any law that defines “natural born citizen”. In 1790, Congress passed the
Naturalization Act of 1790, which extended the meaning of “natural born citizen”
to include the foreign-born children of U.S.-citizen parents”
You went from zero to self-contradicting in two sentences, dude.
“but Congress never again passed any law that explicitly
clarified, defined or extended the meaning of natural born citizenship.”
False- the Immigration and Nationality Act does just that, and it was passed in the 1950s.
“To summarize, we know for sure that persons born in the U.S., of parents who are
U.S. citizens, are definitely, without doubt, natural born citizens. So far, the
Supreme Court has not decided whether natural born citizenship also includes
U.S.-born children of non-citizen parents.”
And until SCOTUS decides that it does NOT include such people, the statutory law stands. That’s 8 USC 1401, which explicitly includes people in Obama’s situation. See, that’s a pretty big misunderstanding of SCOTUS, until it rules a law invalid, the law IS VALID- it’s not in some Schroedinger’s Cat half-life kinda thing.
So yeah, we DO know, for sure, that Obama is a natural born citizen. If SCOTUS comes out with a different ruling (And they never, ever will), then it’s only going to be because they CHANGE the definition of “natural born citizen”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:37 am
And they even cost the same: 7 shillings and sixpence. I can do better than that.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:39 am
I think the legal term here is oppsies. I'm guessing the federal judge in her case isn't going to find this all that amusing.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:40 am
The above discovery courtesy of a Politijab.com researcher who found the template document!
see the whole story at the politijab.com forum.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:43 am
“One of my friends in the small community of Obama “birther”-debunkers…”
Politijab.com!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:47 am
Full story about the original document that Dave refers to can be found at: http://politijab.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=25&…
The poster who goes by Koyaan is the guy who found the original Bomford document. He did an amazing sleuth job. Credit where credit is due… and it's definitely due here.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:50 am
That Louisiana one that you have on your blog is pretty good. The second one is just…funny. The loony troll that posted there, priceless.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:58 am
Why do you people keep trying to deceive others into looking at unrelated websites by lying about what's at your link?
What kind of cretin are you?
Can you not find someone who will let you dance around with a giant arrow at intersections, directing people to sales on major appliances?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:03 am
God that's funny.
Imagine….the birthers are relying on a Russian immigrant woman with an online law degree to 'save the Republic'.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:04 am
“Stephen”, “Stephen”,
We speak truth to delusional birthers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:08 am
It's hardly “unrelated”. It's the actual information that Dave WROTE HIS ARTICLE ABOUT. If that's unrelated in your book, then you need a new dictionary. ;)
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 am
[...] Apparently, Obama has a little more Australian in him than previously [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:26 am
Many of you are missing the MAIN point, the point is the total lockdown of ALL pertinent Obama documents. His birth certificate, his college admissions forms, his HIGH SCHOOL records, law office records, ect ect ect — he has totally hidden all records from his past WHY???????
And the same people that have a problem with those of us that question all of this are the very same people that absolutely believed those phony forged George Bush Air Force documents
The MSM and and their followers!!
p.s. I DO believe he is U.S. citizen, just want to know why the secrecy
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:28 am
*Birthers are thinly veiled as the new : “Koo Koo Kux Klan”. I feel very ashamed that this still exists in the 21 Century. We have a Very Qualified Black President ( U-can disagree with his policies but not his Legitimacy as our President). I think the Birhters have aborted Logic and replaced it with *Racism. If you believe BHO is not the Legal President of the USA. You were most Likely raised in a Racist environment and taught to hate!
Please step away from teaching & Preaching Hate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:32 am
the embossed “seal” looks too small, as well. Kind of looks like they rubbed the paper over a coin to make it look like an embossed seal.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:35 am
None of this changes the need for Obama to produce the vault records that the State of Hawaii has announced they are holding. Those records will confirm or not Obama's claim he was born in a hospital in Hawaii. The COLB is on par with the Kenyan birth certificate. Both on their own prove nothing. We all know the State of Hawaii has the vault birth records, and we all know Obama is refusing to release the records. This issue will continue until Obama stops hiding whatever it is he does not want to come out. Whether it is something embarrassing, or if it shows he lied (for example the records say he was born at home with no witnesses) all needs to come out. This should have been done by the Democratic Party before they placed his name on the primary ballot.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:38 am
I like where they crossed out dog and wrote cat in with a crayon
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:43 am
Obama is not an American citizen. No amount of nonsense denial can change that.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:45 am
I love how birthers are happy to use some Swiss philosophers (not legally binding and not the definition until after the Constitution was written) definition of Natural-born citizen that hasn’t been argued by the Supreme Court but they turn around and scream at Sotomayor and other judges for even checking actual international case law (also not binding but a lot more important than some Swiss guy’s ramblings about citizenship). IOKIYAR.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:45 am
“The COLB is on par with the Kenyan birth certificate”
Except the Kenyan government says the Kenyan birth certificate is a forgery and the United States government says the COLB is real. Other than that, you're right, the two documents are exactly on par.
President Obama doesn't have to show you spit. Why don't you show us something to back up your allegations. Oh, that's right, you don't have any proof, do you?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:50 am
paulnashtn
If you can find ANY of the documents you reference for the Previous President or for that matter any President in the last 60 years you let me know
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:51 am
i guess when your like WAY WACKY, you fail to realize that level headed people might pick your silly little scheme to pieces. great work. for anybody to actually believe that the old white men in power would allow such a falsehood to continue is in itself pretty stupid. I WILL ALWAYS BELIEVE THAT THE REAL REASON FOR THESE BIRTHERS IS THAT THEY ARE RACIST TO THE CORE AND CANNOT STAND THAT FACT THAT WE –THE GOOD OLD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA–NOW HAS A BLACK MAN AS PRESIDENT.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:53 am
i guess when your like WAY WACKY, you fail to realize that level headed people might pick your silly little scheme to pieces. great work. for anybody to actually believe that the old white men in power would allow such a falsehood to continue is in itself pretty stupid. I WILL ALWAYS BELIEVE THAT THE REAL REASON FOR THESE BIRTHERS IS THAT THEY ARE RACIST TO THE CORE AND CANNOT STAND THAT FACT THAT WE –THE GOOD OLD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA–NOW HAS A BLACK MAN AS PRESIDENT.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:55 am
So many mistatements packed in this post. Lets deconstruct them and help our slow friend, Clem:
You realize it was the democrat party, after the Civil War that created the Klu Klux Klan, correct?
*** You realize that Party ideology can evolve (or devolve in the case of the modern Republican Party) over time, right? You probably would have been a Democrat 150 years ago and I would have been the Republican calling you on your BS trashtalking of Lincoln.
You also realize it was a Republican, Abe Lincoln who freed the slaves, correct?
*** See above. If Lincoln were alive today, which Party do you think he’d identify with? Doubtful it would be the Southern Old White Male Corporate Sponsored Republican Party…he was from Illinois, after-all.
You also realize that it was the Republicans who helped LBJ pass Civil Rights legislation while the democrats fought against it, correct?
***Excellent point! Back then, the Republican Party had moderates and even liberals. Back before the great purge and the long march back into obscurity. It was a coalition of progressives in both Parties that brought forth the Civil Rights legislation. If we had to pass Civil Rights legislation today, Republicans would be filibustering it.
You also realize that Republican Dr Martin Luther King was murdered by democrat James Earl Ray, correct?
***Yes, he was a Southern Dixiecrat, but, more importantly, he was a racist.
You also realize that the democrat party still have a very prominent Klan member in the US Senate, correct? Robert C Byrd of WV to be exact.
*** Amazing that people can change, eh? There’s hope for you, yet.
The democrat party founded the Ku Klux Klan as a domestic terrorist arm with the goal of destroying the Republican party. Go read some history.
***True, Nathan Bedford Forrest was a Confederate General who was a Democrat….what Party would old Nathan be hooked up with today? The Party of Barack Obama or Jeff Sessions? Think real hard about this one, Clem.
No one gives a damn that Obama is black, or half black, or actually half white, almost half Arab, with some black.
***Well, except you do – “He is also an evil bastard intent on destroying our great nation.”. C’mon…let your racist freak flag fly. You know you really hate black folks…I can almost hear Nathan channeling you…..
What we care about is Obama is an America hating communist bent on destroying everything good about America and turning it into a communist state. He is pure evil and has wiped his ass with the Constitution. He is intent on destroying liberty and freedom.
*** After having lived through the last administration’s trillion dollar taxcut for the rich, asleep at the wheel on 9/11, starting an illegal/immoral war based on lies, letting a US city drown, and implementing the most serious destruction of civil liberties… excuse me while I laugh at your concern about the Constitution. And please give us details on how Obama is turning us into a Communist state. I thought he was turning us into an Islamofacist Caliphate? Communism is pretty passe. But if Obama creates 24MM new jobs, like Clinton did…..maybe we could learn to love it, Comrade Clem!
All I know is Barack Obama has spent almost $1 million dollars with the law firm Perkins-Coie defending himself in all of the dozens of eligibility cases. Obama could get a certified copy of his original long form birth certificate for $10!
***All I know is that you have no idea what legal fees are generated to run a 50 state Presidential campaign. Did you figure this talking point out on your own, Clem?
Why then has he spent a million bucks, so far, when in September of 2007, when DEMOCRAT Phillip Berg filed the first lawsuit, he could have ended this for $10?
**Maybe he likes pulling your chain, Clem. Maybe he knows that no proof will ever satisfy birfers like you Clem. Maybe he wants to drive you bonkers, Clem.
Doesn’t make sense to me either.
***Having read your post, I understand why nothing makes sense to you, Clem.
Obama is a poseur and a usurper.
***You are racist, Clem. A sad, pathetic rube that is being exploited by corporate lobbyists to vote/act against your best interests. You are being manipulated by the same folks that have been cleaning out this country for decades and you aren’t bright enough to figure it out.
He is also an evil bastard intent on destroying our great nation.
***You are racist, Clem. A sad, pathetic rube that is being exploited by corporate lobbyists to vote/act against your best interests. You are being manipulated by the same folks that have been cleaning out this country for decades and you aren’t bright enough to figure it out.
Here’s more on Perkin-Coie
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/...
http://texas4palin.blogspot.com/2009/07/latest-...
Oh, and here is a video Barack Obama does NOT want you to see. They were going to IMPEACH Richard Nixon for a hell of a lot less that what he is involved in here. Especially with the payoffs.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13302
***You’re right Nixon would have been impeached for crimes he committed had he not had the good sense to put Gerald Ford in, resign, and then get himself pardoned. Everything else, is just unmitigated BS.
Barack Obama will prove to be one of the greatest Presidents this country has elected. It’ll drive you mad, Clem, but you’ll just have to remain on the short bus and let the adults handle the driving.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:56 am
You realize it was the democrat party, after the Civil War that created the Klu Klux Klan, correct?
You also realize it was a Republican, Abe Lincoln who freed the slaves, correct?
You also realize that it was the Republicans who helped LBJ pass Civil Rights legislation while the democrats fought against it, correct?
You also realize that Republican Dr Martin Luther King was murdered by democrat James Earl Ray, correct?
You also realize that the democrat party still have a very prominent Klan member in the US Senate, correct? Robert C Byrd of WV to be exact.
The democrat party founded the Ku Klux Klan as a domestic terrorist arm with the goal of destroying the Republican party. Go read some history.
No one gives a damn that Obama is black, or half black, or actually half white, almost half Arab, with some black.
What we care about is Obama is an America hating communist bent on destroying everything good about America and turning it into a communist state. He is pure evil and has wiped his ass with the Constitution. He is intent on destroying liberty and freedom.
All I know is Barack Obama has spent almost $1 million dollars with the law firm Perkins-Coie defending himself in all of the dozens of eligibility cases. Obama could get a certified copy of his original long form birth certificate for $10!
Why then has he spent a million bucks, so far, when in September of 2007, when DEMOCRAT Phillip Berg filed the first lawsuit, he could have ended this for $10?
Doesn't make sense to me either.
Obama is a poseur and a usurper.
He is also an evil bastard intent on destroying our great nation.
Here's more on Perkin-Coie
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/…
http://texas4palin.blogspot.com/2009/07/latest-…
Oh, and here is a video Barack Obama does NOT want you to see. They were going to IMPEACH Richard Nixon for a hell of a lot less that what he is involved in here. Especially with the payoffs.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13302
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:59 am
You would think, Doc3 , that this would be all the more reason why Obama should produce his vault copy of his BC, to end all this hoax BS, and for us to move on to other things, after all if Obama is indeed a “natural born citizen” then the vault copy will PROVE it. I believe that Obama's people themselves are keeping this going to distract from the HORRIBLE job Obama is doing and to distract attention from the direction of socialism this country is headed toward under Obama.
It's the only theory that makes sense.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:00 am
I haven't believed he is a ligitimate candidate when he was running for the primary nomination.
Maybe he was born in Hawaii, that doesn't automatically make him qualified either. He can be the biggest fraud and threat to the nation we have ever seen- despite being black.
I believe your the racist.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:00 am
I haven't believed he is a ligitimate candidate when he was running for the primary nomination.
Maybe he was born in Hawaii, that doesn't automatically make him qualified either. He can be the biggest fraud and threat to the nation we have ever seen- despite being black.
I believe your the racist.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:02 am
Think there’s a correlation between poor spelling/grammar and birfism? I do.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:04 am
Kevin Lately said: “I think the Birhters have aborted Logic and replaced it with *Racism. If you believe BHO is not the Legal President of the USA. You were most Likely raised in a Racist environment and taught to hate!”
Are you stuck on stupid? Did it ever occur to you that such resentment and conspiracy mongering would have existed no matter who won the Presidency? Be it Barack Uh-uh-uh-bama, Hillary Clinton, or John McCain.
Don't believe it? Does “Vincent Foster and the trail of bodies” ring a bell? How about the fact that MORE DEMOCRATS believed Bush was complacent in 9-11 than Republicans who doubt Obama's country of birth?
So are you really that stupid that you think this is about racism? Or maybe it's because we've been saddled with a socialist who has never held a real job, unless you count being a disciple of Saul Alinsky and William Ayers…maybe THAT is why people want to embrace a theory that questions his legitimacy.
If you still think it's racism, do yourself a favor. Don't vote. Don't breed. Don't breath.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:07 am
Never held a real job?
He was a law firm associate at a large Chicago firm. He was also a law professor at the top law school in the country, for 12 years. Do you even know what you're talking about or do you just make things up as you go along?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:07 am
YOU ARE A DAMN RACIST, get ver yourslef with your RACIST RANTS. You ever think that some people believe in teh rule of Law and the Consitution?
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:10 am
[...] More here: The Washington Independent » Is This the Source of the Forged … [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:12 am
To think like Doc3 and the rest of the birfers, you believe a Russian/Israeli emigrant and some unauthenticated document over the official State document of Hawaii. It’s very strange that these people who claim to love America so much, hate their fairly elected President, hate the 60MM people who voted for President Obama, hate Hawaiians – but love a lone nut baggess woth a heavy peroxide dyejob.
A shame Orly can’t run for President in 2012. :-0
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:14 am
LOL, you guys will believe anything.
The damn fold lines don't even match
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
thanks for taking the bait you fool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:15 am
Name one legal opinion he authored. Oh, snap! Got you there, didn't I?
And he was little more than a guest lecturer at University of Chicago Law School, hardly a “law professor”. It was during this time he was a…ahem…”community organizer”, Bill Ayers partner at Woods, AND Illinois State Senator who was also trying to run as U.S. Representative AND U.S. Senator. He was no law “professor”, and you're damn gullible to believe it.
Stop reading his glorified bio and think for yourself.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:19 am
Oh, socialism? Evil, evil. Get a grip, America – so-called “free market” capitalism has crashed and burned for 95% of Americans.
A mixed economy is the way forward. Doesn't have to be full-blooded socialism, or even as advanced as Japan's. But you've had socialism for years – like it or not. State-financed weapons industries, state-supported airlines and transport, government-funded roads, education, etc.
A little compassion from Americans, rather than the random psychopathic violence visited round the world, would go a long way to restoring the USA to a place worthy of respect.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:23 am
You do realize that all those Kluxers and garden variety racists in the “Democrat” party bolted to the Republicans after the Dems passed the Civil Rights Act legislation in the '60's? Right?
Good riddance.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:24 am
Ah, Obama's destroying your freedom? Just like GWB maintained your “freedom” with the “PATRIOT” Act, etc.? Get a grip on reality, man. Start taking the meds again – they might help you.
Don't disagree about the D vs R 150 years ago, by the way. But since Reagan, Republicans have been on the side against the people, Democrats (nominally) for the people. Things change, even in the backward, ignorant US of A.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 am
Look, I tend to believe that Obama was born in Hawaii, but you should understand that under Hawaiian Law in 1961 you could be born on MARS and get a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth, which is what Obama claims to have. It IS different than a birth certificate. Obama's sister from his mother's marriage to Lolo Soetoro was born in the Philippines and has the same Hawaiian Birth certificate Obama has. That's UNDISPUTED fact.
The certificate Obama had on his website was an obvious forgery.
Now I know, “FactChech.org” claims to have “verified” it, but FactCheck is bogus itself. This is part of the Annenberg group. The same group that funneled millions of dollars to Barack Obama and domestic murdering terrorist Bill Ayers when they sat on the boards of the Woods Fund and the Annenberg Challenge. Ayers was chair of both of these. Most of that money was funneled to ACORN. LOOK IT UP.
Again, Obama could have cleared ALL of this up almost 3 years ago by releasing his REAL birth certificate. Remember it was a DEMOCRAT who started all of this. Everyone else just started following a logical path.
Why in God's name has Obama spent a million bucks on this?
He IS hiding something.
The Constitution Article II Section 1 of the Constitution says:
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
Natural born means being born to TWO parents who were American citizens. On this point alone, Obama fails. His father was a British subject, and under British law and treaties of the day, Obama held dual citizenship at birth.
This may, or may not, disqualify Obama. Many think it does. But the Court must certainly rule on this. It's their constitutional duty.
Funny thing, Congress, including Obama, made a big stink about John McCain, who was born in Panama. Now, obviously McCain was born to two United States citizens. And Panama was US territory at the time. and yet, there was a big stink, and the Senate actually passed a non binding resolution declaring McCain “natural born”
Do any of you folks understand WHY the founders wanted someone to BE natural born before they could become President?
Well, the founders instinctively knew that a man or woman must feel total allegiance to America, and no other nation or cause, or they would not be fit for the office.
In this too, Obama is an Epic Failure. Obama HATES America in it's traditional form. Obama was raised by radical America hating communists. He was mentored by radical Frank Marshall Davis, and befriended by anti-American crazies like domestic terrorists Bill ayers and his insane preacher of 20 years the Rev Jeremiah “God Damn America' Wright.
Obama may, or may not actually be eligible to be POTUS. That is a case for the Supreme court. But one thing is for sure, he is NOT fit to be POTUS. He is nothing more that a Chicago street thug. He hates America, and calls our Constitution “deeply flawed”.
Epic Fail.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:28 am
Wow, that was fun. Lotsa exclamation points.
Now then, let's get back to looking at what is obviously the source of the forged Kenyan burf sirtifikat.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:29 am
No, he was more than a “guest lecturer.” He was an adjunct professor, which means he taught Constitutional Law for U of C students. Yes, he was a community organizer. No, he didn't make legal opinion. Few lawyers do. Judges do. Did Ronald Reagan create law before being in politics? GWB? Of course not.
He ran as US congress considerably before he ran for Senate. I know. I live in Chicago. He lost his bid for Rep. Bobby Rush's congressional seat. Then he ran for senate.
Get your facts straight.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:29 am
No, he was more than a “guest lecturer.” He was an adjunct professor, which means he taught Constitutional Law for U of C students. Yes, he was a community organizer. No, he didn't make legal opinion. Few lawyers do. Judges do. Did Ronald Reagan create law before being in politics? GWB? Of course not.
He ran as US congress considerably before he ran for Senate. I know. I live in Chicago. He lost his bid for Rep. Bobby Rush's congressional seat. Then he ran for senate.
Get your facts straight.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:30 am
O'Fraud needs to “get ver” himself. He doesn't have any clue as to what ” teh rule of Law and the Consitution” means. He should also learn to read & write English. What a birther fool.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:33 am
He was not an adjunct professor either. This is what the University of Chicago actually has to say about the issue:
“The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as “Senior Lecturer.” From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:34 am
Doofus. He worked at Sidley & Austin. Big Chicago-based mega firm. I clerked for their LA office as a summer associate.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Lawyers don't “author” “legal opinions.”
Judges do.
You can set up WHATEVER nonsensical bullshit you want.
Obama taught constitutional law AS A PROFESSOR at U of Chicago. He was not a “guest lecturer.”
Read the U of Chicago's own words:
“From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year.
Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching.”
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/28/132341/045
“Oh, snap! Got you there, didn't I?”
Get a life, doofus.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:35 am
I didn't expect any reasonable comments here, Hugh. Thank you. I totally agree. No sarcasm at all. Thank you for exceeding my expectations.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:35 am
Define “legal opinion.”
Every lawyer, law student and law professor authors “opinions” on various legal issues. A formal “opinion” is commonly referred to rulings written by judges though, so I don't really know what you're talking about since we all agree that Obama has never been a judge.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:36 am
I think we were posting at the same time, Neil.
Good going!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:38 am
How is Obama supposed to release vault records that he doesn't actually have?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:39 am
Could be. Could also be a fake source document template. In this day and age who's to say Koyaan didn't do a one-off on the Kenyan document submitted to the court? Just saying.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:39 am
YOU “get ver yourslef” and get serious about combating that dyslexia.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:41 am
If 'all you know' is that Obama has spent $1 million dollars fighting this you don't know anything.
It isn't true. It's speculation with no actual evidence, like everything else the birfers have come up with.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:43 am
If you say “Maybe he was born in Hawaii, that doesn't automatically make him qualified,”
then…
“I believe your the” doofus. Because you don't understand basic citizenship law.
Also, “I believe your” a bad speller.
I say that for a “ligitimate” reason.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:48 am
Sure you do. Prove it. To my satisfaction. Moron.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:48 am
Sure you do. Prove it. To my satisfaction. Moron.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:50 am
Judges author legal opinions. Stop showing off your ignorance.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:51 am
“All I know is Barack Obama has spent almost $1 million dollars with the law firm Perkins-Coie defending himself in all of the dozens of eligibility cases.”
No. That isn't true. So, by your own admission, you don't know a damned thing.
Obama's FEC quarterly filing shows a large sum going to a large law firm named Perkins Coie. It is a one line entry. The filing shows every expense the Obama campaign incurred or paid (not clear which) in a quarter (undefined as to months or year covered).
It is not broken out by matter worked on or by time spent working or by how many attorneys were engaged. It just, literally, says Obama paid a law firm X dollars.
You do not have any basis to suspect that any or all of that sum went to defend birther suits.
EVERY major candidate for President, even the way-siders like Fred Thompson and John Edwards, to say nothing of McCain and Clinton, engaged large law firms to handle the myriad legal issues that come up in a national campaign.
Unless you look at McCain and Clinton as well as Obama, you know nothing of context; $1 million in legal fees, even if I granted that was true, is NOT a big deal for a national campaign that generates $300 million in contributions. It's less than 1/3 of one percent!
And unless you know what the firm was billing for, you're just speculating as to whether the money went to birther suits.
The figure is pulled out of thin air. Read what Politico reported way back in March 2009 about Gary Kreep, Alan Keyes's California lawyer, made up about Obama's fees:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19450…
While you're at it, read what Politico reports about conservatives trying to rid themselves of birthers (same article as above link):
“The conservative talk show host Michael Medved recently referred to the movement's leaders as “crazy, nutburger, demagogue, money-hungry, exploitative, irresponsible, filthy conservative imposters” who are “the worst enemy of the conservative movement.”
“It makes us look weird. It makes us look crazy. It makes us look demented. It makes us look sick, troubled, and not suitable for civilized company,” he mourned.
One of the lead anti-Obama lawyers, Orly Taitz, a California dentist with a degree from an online law school, promptly threatened to sue Medved for defamation.”
Enjoy!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:52 am
Yes, he is. He has exactly the same sort of certification of birth that I do, and I'm a seventh generation American who is eligible to join the DAR.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:54 am
How can you tell when a politician (any party by the way) is lying ???
Their lips are moving…!!
Want an enjoyable read ? The Federalist Papers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:54 am
How can you tell when a politician (any party by the way) is lying ???
Their lips are moving…!!
Want an enjoyable read ? The Federalist Papers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:54 am
And the Republicans and the Democrats have switched positions on virtually everything over the past 150+ years since the Civil War. Or didn't they teach you that in Birther Civics Class?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:54 am
hi precious, yea- i do believe that some people believe in teh rule of las and the constitution–just not the wingnuts/birthers. you brighten my day with your silliness. next you'll be saying that Barack can't be prez cause he's a negro and –”well you know–their not really humans”.
get over it. he is the prez and yes–HE IS YOUR PRESIDENT!!!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:56 am
What's even funnier is that not long ago the birthers would have scorned Orly Taitz as a possible Russian spy, or possibly as an Evil Jew. Now they think she's the fount of all wisdom because she got a worthless law degree from a diploma mill
*shakes head*
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:56 am
Just in case you didn't know, it is quite common for Kenyan bureaucrats to take on an Australian bureaucrat's last name as a sort of tip 'o the hat their Australian friends. Next time do some research, for God's sake…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:59 am
See the real fake at http://storyarc.squarespace.com/vault-copy-obam…
ice9
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:59 am
LEMME SEE HERE–IF HE'S ALL THAT AND ALL POWERFUL–WHY O WHY CAN'T HE STOP THE VIEWING OF THIS SO CALLED VIDEO TO END ALL VIDS. HMMM, DOESN'T MAKE A LOT OF SENSE DOES IT.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:59 am
LEMME SEE HERE–IF HE'S ALL THAT AND ALL POWERFUL–WHY O WHY CAN'T HE STOP THE VIEWING OF THIS SO CALLED VIDEO TO END ALL VIDS. HMMM, DOESN'T MAKE A LOT OF SENSE DOES IT.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:00 am
Although Weigel has lied and misled about other, non-Kenya aspects of this issue, he might have gotten this one right.
Say, if any HotAir readers want to see how Ed Morrissey and Allahpundit are hurting the GOP at the same time as they refuse to bust the MSM for obvious lies, see this.
Apparently Ed and Allahpundit think you have to engage in “birther theories” to point out that the MSM has made a long series of factual errors in their reporting on this issue. For instance, CNN just made something up, claiming that HI's governor had said something she never said.
And, Ed and Allahpundit refuse to take the MSM to task over that, despite the fact that you don't have to engage in “birther theories” to do it. Let them know what you think.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:02 am
Aren't we special … Did you win the spelling bee as a child? … Did your Mother not teach you that it's impolite to point (retorically speaking of course) … Oh darn … I forgot … all “youse” progressives are air heads … you can not help it. Please correct my post and let me know where my errors are. “Youse is so smarts” Thanx
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:04 am
Well, how damn gullible do you think we are ynot? You're the one that implied he had never had a job and then you asked what legal opinion's he authored. So which is it moron. He either did or didn't have a job because you can't have it both ways..
Talking with Republicans is like talking to my dead aunt Thelma. They have not a clue.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:06 am
I'll do you the courtesy of letting you pick at your own scabs in relative obscurity.
But if you post something here that is plainly disingenuous, in which you insult others while denying the reality that we all see around us, then I will not refrain from mocking you in the course of pointing out the error of your pretzel logic.
That's what happens when you make a name like “KenyanMuslimsMakePoorLeaders.” You attract attention. It's what you wanted. Just not the kind of attention you wanted.
You can't spell “rhertorically.” So I won't bore you with my spelling bee exploits.
Thanx
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:09 am
Your heart is your best compass. Love is the supreme expression of life, it is the essence and ground of all creation.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:09 am
Stop slandering David Weigel.
You continue to assert, baselessly, that he lied or misled someone. Multiple people have called you on it. Have you no shame?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:10 am
the birth certificate is not the issue. In “Dreams of my Father”,Obama says his father was a UK subject. The constitution says both parents have to be “Natural Born ” American citizens. He does not meet that ” ONE THING” plus all the money he has spent to not release anything. Thats the reason people think something is not right. It is not just left, right, dems, rep. It is most of America.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 am
Obama is the legitimate and duly-elected President of the United States.
“No amount of nonsense denial can change that.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 am
As an australian born in 1966, I can confirm that this is what my birth certificate looks like, the only amusing thing is watching this weird witch from russia run with it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 am
and the 1st national Imperial Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan was that distinguished democrat,disgruntled Southerrn General,Nathan Bedford Forrest-whom the north had Custer and the 7th cavaly chase all over the south and could never catch lol-
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:16 am
It is NOT most of America. It is a wacko 25%, of which you are right in the wacko middle of. And both parents do NOT have to be natural born citizens. You are seriously wacko'd out on even the basic facts. It's too bad you don't have the desire (or is it that you don't have the simple intelligence?) to find out even the first fact about what you are trying to talk about.
I think if someone is as dumb as you, it would have been better if you hadn't been born, period.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 am
I don’t care where you scrub toilets, you obviously don’t know anything about acquiring passports.
However, I am glad to hear that you have a job, because I believe in hiring the mentally handicapped.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 am
I don’t care where you scrub toilets, you obviously don’t know anything about acquiring passports.
However, I am glad to hear that you have a job, because I believe in hiring the mentally handicapped.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:19 am
You should reread the constitution. It says NOTHING about the parents at all. It says the person who is president must be a “natural born citizen”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:20 am
Please provide a link to that because I just reviewed the Constitution and I didn't see that anywhere
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:21 am
Yes, I knew it was a ringer from the first we laid eyes on it! It was created to distract and discredit! Regardless, just because the world consists of hoaxers – this does not make the argument that Barack, Barry Obama may have possibly been born in in Kenya any less relevant!
The old psyop Illuminatti trick of making the water muddy won't work here! The whole point of this is that Birthers' are demanding to see the” actual original legal birth cetificate and track records”, of Barack Hussein Obama, regardless of which country his records come from as called for in compliance with the Constitution of The United States of America as provisions to qualify to be the President of The United States of America! I don't know why it is that Barack won't or can't produce his? If he has lost his Birth Certificate and Documents, Departments of Statistics in all countries of the world usually produce the certificate that backs up their legal files of registrations in that country! I have mine and a baptism certificate as well and it has been around for a while ! Most people I speak with and ask all have one or sure quickly know how to retrieve one from their Federal Government!
What is going on here? Just how stupid does Barack, his Government, Czars and Global Elitist friends think the American citizens are? You know what? I think they are in for a surprise! They have already hung themselves several times within the law of Treason and don't even have the faculty of mind to realize it!
In addition to all that a writer tpgrow on this webpage has already brought up a true fact, “In “Dreams of my Father”,Obama says his father was a UK subject. The constitution says both parents have to be “Natural Born ” American citizens.” This checked out legally in it's self should be enough to remove Obama from the Whitehouse!
Now lets' Audit and Abolish the Fed Make sure your Congressmen support Bill HR1207 and that your Senators support Bill S604 . It is well passed time to' clean House folks!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:21 am
The currency on the “Kenyan” birth certificate is also wrong. The figure in the upper left — “7s. 6d.” — is part of the pre-decimalization, pound/shilling/pence system used in the U.K. and Australia until the late 60's. (“d” was a Latinate abbreviation for pence, and was changed to “p” once decimalization occurred.) Kenya's currency in 1964, however, was completely different. It was the Kenyan shilling, divided into 100 cents. If the cost of the document were 7 Kenyan shillings and 6 Kenyan cents, this would have been written as 7' 6
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:21 am
The Constitution says that a candidate for president must be a “natural born Citizen,” at least 35 years of age and at least 14 years a resident within the United States, which would include someone born in the US (such as Obama) and/or the child of an American citizen (such as Obama).
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:21 am
The Constitution says that a candidate for president must be a “natural born Citizen,” at least 35 years of age and at least 14 years a resident within the United States, which would include someone born in the US (such as Obama) and/or the child of an American citizen (such as Obama).
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:22 am
If you could cite your reference for “both parents have to be “Natural Born”. I have posted this excerpt for your reference.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:24 am
And your credibility? Dave uses his real name, you don't.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:25 am
Now the question occurs; Who would gain from producing such an easily exposed fraud? I would ask how Orly was so easily duped, but most of us know the answer to that. What amazes me is that WND was taken in by the same hoax.
Could WND still have an ace up their sleeve we don't know about?
Full document here:
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/08/wnd-a…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:25 am
Er,
Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
I don't see the part about both parents; where in the Constitution is that written again?….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:25 am
Er,
Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
I don't see the part about both parents; where in the Constitution is that written again?….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:26 am
Celcus wins the thread! I forgot all about the fish license sketch. Luckily, Orly Taitz and her friends in the Kenyan Ministry of Housinge are around to find the real documents.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:27 am
The Constitution says no such thing about both parents having to be natural born citizens for a child born on US soil to be a natural born citizen himself. Quit pulling stuff out of your butt.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:28 am
tpgow you are wrong. The Constitutional requirement to be President is:
Age and Citizenship requirements – US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
The only time the requirement that both parents be U.S. Citizens is when the child is born outside the United States and it isn't in the Constitution. Hawaii is not outside the U.S. To break it down for you:
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”
* Anyone born inside the United States *
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:31 am
You are a liar. The constitution does not define the phrase natural born. It has een defined in the US according to English common law.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:31 am
NEWS FLASH! NEWS NAG…..If in fact you had facts you would have posted a fact. Though the constitution has never defined the “Natural Born” SCOTUS has in Wong Kim Ark. SCOYUS defined “Natural Born” by BOTH(2) must be citizens please educate yourself in case law!
The SC has to date (Wong Kim Ark) ONLY upheld citizenship of “Natural Born” as 2
parents being US citizens. NOT 1 parent as US citizen and 1 parent being
non-citizen as in Obama’s father case. Also, (Wong Kim Ark) couldn’t be used as
a defense to Obama because: The Supreme Court did not rule that Mr. Ark was a
natural born citizen. It merely ruled that he was a citizen. Even if Barack
Obama’s circumstances at birth were identical to those of Mr. Ark, the Wong Kim
Ark decision would, at most, only convey citizenship to the President. It would
not convey natural born citizenship, which is what the President needs in order
to be eligible to hold office (SCOTUS in ‘Wong Kim Ark’).
Mr. Ark was granted citizenship because, at the time of Mr. Ark’s birth, his
parents had “permanent domicile and residence” in the United States and was
“carrying on business” in the United States. President Obama’s father did not
meet these conditions. He was not a permanent resident and he was not doing
business in the U.S. He was merely visiting the U.S. temporarily, presumably on
a student visa, for the purpose of getting an American education.
To summarize, we know for sure that persons born in the U.S., of parents who are
U.S. citizens, are definitely, without doubt, natural born citizens. So far, the
Supreme Court has not decided whether natural born citizenship also includes
U.S.-born children of non-citizen parents.
Thanks For Playing!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:31 am
Here is the exact language out of the constitution it clearly only requires the president be natural born, it does not say anything about the president's parents. If you are going to believe a conspiracy theory like this at least take three seconds to look online for the “facts” you think support your theory.
“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.” available at http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constit…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:32 am
Again, where in the constitution does it state that both parents have to be “natural born citizens”. If you could actually show in any government document the definition of “natural born citizen” I will give you a cookie.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:34 am
Yes, I believe I made an error at any rate I stand to be corrected or informed as such but I believe that is true as long as an individual has been born in the United States of America or it's Territories a “Natural born citizen” !
Naybe we should copy and post the, Constitution of The United States of America , on this site so we can all check that part out? :>)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:35 am
heh.
Okay, I'll bite. I actually *do* believe that Bush was “complacent” in 9-11 (cf. August 6th PDB, “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US,” and Suskind's reporting in his 2006 book: “And, at an eyeball-to-eyeball intelligence briefing during this urgent summer, George W. Bush seems to have made the wrong choice. He looked hard at the panicked CIA briefer. ‘All right,’ he said. ‘You’ve covered your ass, now.’”)
But I'll bet that's not what you meant, is it? (You probably didn't mean for me not to “breath” either. Oh well.)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:37 am
Can't site case law, but I know there is a child in Chicago whose mother is an undocumented alien, but he is a cirtizen. It was a big story in the Chicago papers.
But it has nothing to do with POTUS Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:37 am
Weigel knows perfectly well who I am, since he wrote a post about me and then refused to approve a comment I left showing how he was wrong.
Also, you can find my real name in all the entries I posted here: michellemalkin.com/immigration/2005/05
Consider thinking before posting.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:41 am
WND posted an article on 8.23.2008 confirming that the COLB Obama provided is authentic.
“A separate WND investigation into Obama's certification of live birth utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren't originally there.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI…
Could WND have an ace up their sleeve? Buy their video for $18.99 and tell us, Aristotle.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:42 am
I'm not aware of anyone presenting a valid, factual, logical, intellectually-honest counter-argument to anything I've written about Weigel. You can try this. See if you can find any supporting evidence for either of the first two statements Weigel made that I discuss at that link.
To make it even easier: Weigel claimed that Hawaiian officials said the cert on BHO's site wasn't forged. Can anyone find anything – besides the HI spokeswoman who reversed herself on the same Politifact page – that backs up Weigel's claim? I call him a liar because… he's lied. Hawaiian officials didn't say the picture on BHO's site wasn't forged, even if Weigel thinks they did.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:42 am
Faux, not wrong I suggest you learn case law. There are 2 definitions of “Natural Born” Constitutional and statutory which would fall under USC. SCOTUS has already defined (2) parents defines it in the constitution which is what is in play regarding “O's” citizenship. Let me type this slowly so you understand!
“Natural Born” is not defined in the constitution nor
any federal law only inelligibility guidelines. So far, Congress has not passed
any law that defines “natural born citizen”. In 1790, Congress passed the
Naturalization Act of 1790, which extended the meaning of “natural born citizen”
to include the foreign-born children of U.S.-citizen parents:
And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the
sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural
born citizens (Naturalization Act of 1790)
Five years later, Congress repealed the 1790 Act and replaced it with the
Naturalization Act of 1795. The wording of the 1795 Act was essentially the same
as the 1790 Act, except that the term “natural born citizens” was deleted and
replaced with “citizens”.
Thereafter, Congress has passed laws that convey American citizenship to certain
people at birth, but Congress never again passed any law that explicitly
clarified, defined or extended the meaning of natural born citizenship. Senate
Bill S.2128 was supposed to define “natural born citizen”, but it was never
enacted. The bill was referred to the Judiciary Committee in 2004, where it has
remained ever since. In 2008, the Senate passed Resolution 511 regarding
Presidential candidate John McCain’s natural born citizenship, but the
resolution was nonbinding and had no legal effect.
Every U.S. President who was born after 1787 — except President Barack Obama
and President Chester Arthur — was born in the United States, to parents who
were both U.S. citizens. The general public did not learn until recently that,
when Chester Arthur was born, his father was not a U.S. citizen. The 2008
election is the first time in American history that America knowingly elected a
post-1787-born President whose parents were not both U.S. citizens.
When Chester Arthur ran for Vice President and later President, he told outright
lies and burned historical records, to conceal the fact that, although he was
born in the United States, his father was a British Subject and not a U.S.
citizen at the time of his (President Arthur’s) birth. If “natural born citizen”
means anyone born in the United States, regardless of parental citizenship, why
did Chester Arthur go through so much trouble to convince the public that his
parents were U.S. citizens when he was born? It is inconceivable that Chester
Arthur would have taken such extraordinary measures, unless he believed that his
birth to non-citizen parents made him ineligible to serve as VP or President.
The SC has to date (Wong Kim Ark) ONLY upheld citizenship of “Natural Born” as 2
parents being US citizens. NOT 1 parent as US citizen and 1 parent being
non-citizen as in Obama’s father case. Also, (Wong Kim Ark) couldn’t be used as
a defense to Obama because: The Supreme Court did not rule that Mr. Ark was a
natural born citizen. It merely ruled that he was a citizen. Even if Barack
Obama’s circumstances at birth were identical to those of Mr. Ark, the Wong Kim
Ark decision would, at most, only convey citizenship to the President. It would
not convey natural born citizenship, which is what the President needs in order
to be eligible to hold office (SCOTUS in ‘Wong Kim Ark’).
Mr. Ark was granted citizenship because, at the time of Mr. Ark’s birth, his
parents had “permanent domicile and residence” in the United States and was
“carrying on business” in the United States. President Obama’s father did not
meet these conditions. He was not a permanent resident and he was not doing
business in the U.S. He was merely visiting the U.S. temporarily, presumably on
a student visa, for the purpose of getting an American education.
To summarize, we know for sure that persons born in the U.S., of parents who are
U.S. citizens, are definitely, without doubt, natural born citizens. So far, the
Supreme Court has not decided whether natural born citizenship also includes
U.S.-born children of non-citizen parents.
Now regarding what you stated of the federal statute there is “Constitutional”
and “Statutory” natural born citizens as follows:
“Constitutional natural born citizen” refers to the term “natural born citizen”
when it appears in the Constitution or in a Constitution-related document such
as a Supreme Court decision. It refers to the meaning of “natural born citizen”
in the Constitution, whatever the Supreme Court ultimately decides such meaning
to be.
“Statutory natural born citizen” refers to someone who is deemed a “natural born
citizen” as a result of a Federal or State law.
Currently, there is no Federal law that explicitly defines “natural born
citizen” or explicitly conveys “natural born citizenship” to anyone. However,
existing laws are sometimes understood or interpreted as conveying natural born
citizenship to certain individuals at birth. At this point, we do not pass
judgment on these understandings and interpretations. We merely say that, if
someone is deemed to be a “natural born citizen” pursuant to a law or statute,
we refer to such person as a “statutory natural born citizen”.
A statutory natural born citizen is not necessarily the same thing as a
Constitutional natural born citizen. The U.S. State Department warns against
confusing the two concepts:
…the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does
not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional
purposes in U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual — 7 FAM 1130
If we were to define “natural born citizen” to mean anyone who is a “citizen at
birth”, our definition of “natural born citizen” would be statutory because it
would depend on the statute or law which defines “citizen at birth”. Under
existing law, all children born in the United States (except the children of
foreign diplomats) are “citizens at birth”. Therefore, under existing law,
almost all children born in the U.S. — including children of illegal immigrants
– could be regarded as statutory natural born citizens.
However, H.R.1940, also known as the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007, would
change the existing law so that it would no longer grant “citizenship at birth”
to children of illegal immigrants. If Congress were to pass H.R.1940, it would
alter the meaning of “citizen at birth”, and therefore would alter our statutory
definition of natural born citizen. If H.R.1940 were enacted, the U.S.-born
children of illegal immigrants could no longer be regarded as statutory natural
born citizens.
To summarize:
“Statutory natural born citizen” is the meaning of “natural born citizen” when
such meaning depends on a Federal or State law. As Federal and State laws
change, the meaning of “statutory natural born citizen” changes accordingly.
“Constitutional natural born citizen” is the meaning of “natural born citizen”
as used in the Constitution.
If Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, he could be regarded as a statutory natural
born citizen. But a statutory natural born citizen is not necessarily a
Constitutional natural born citizen. And therein the problem lies.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:47 am
Since this post is probably getting a lot of HotAir readers, I urge them to see the earlier comments I left down below.
I mean, seriously: why the heck is HotAir promoting David Schuster? Aren't they smart or creative enough to think up an angle that wouldn't involve promoting MSNBC?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:47 am
How about doing some research. The University of Chicago law school issued a statement because they were getting so many inquiries. Obama was a professor.
The University of Chicago says that Obama is entitled to describe himself as a professor during his time teaching there
From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers has high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/deadlineusa/200…
I cannot believe this is still a talking point. But I'm glad to set you straight since you've been the gullible one.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:49 am
Oh, I did think. However, I am not all that interested in who you are, since I know what you are..a liar and a spammer.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:51 am
It is funny that so many complain about Obama and where he was alledgedly born. However, it took Senate action to ensure that the republican candidate, John McCain, was eligible since he was born outside the US and a full year before Congress ruled that people born of American parents outside the US were “natural born”. I just wish that the courts would put a hefty price tag on these suits and apply it to the national debt.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:53 am
If you have a valid, factual, logical, intellectually-honest counter-argument to anything I've written about this issue, let me know. Otherwise, please stop making noise.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:55 am
John McCain on;y became an issue to take the heat off of “O” . McCain was NEVER an issue because BOTH of his parents were US Citizens and a military base or embassy ANYWHERE in the world is considered american soil!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:59 am
Orly Taintz is gonna do you for this, as soon as she settles with Moose and Squirrel.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:00 am
[...] Is This The Source of the Forged Kenyan Birth Certficate? By David Weigel, The Washington Independent, Aug. 3, 2009. (Similarities to Australian forms easily available online.) [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:02 am
face it liberals, your messiah Obama is BUSTED.
This is proof he was born in Africa, and no ammount of liberal lies and spin will discredit this very authentic document. Obama will be exposed, deported, and the Republicans will fix the damage he wrought on our country.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:07 am
Geez I sure hope you are being sarcastic because I can't quite figure it out. IF you really believe this, then…..welllll.
IF you are being sarcastic, seems a bit over the top.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:09 am
“Who would gain from producing such an easily exposed fraud?”
Anyone looking for quick buck. The screen name “InspectorSmith” comes to mind….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:10 am
Yeah, Liberals, why can't you just face the facts? Like good old AMY here, who really seems to have a headlock on reality.
This document IS irrefutable proof, and Obama will be deported. Anyone who can't see that is COMPLETELY DELUSIONAL.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:10 am
No, no — nobody needs to post the Constitution. It is readily available at zillions of places online, in libraries, in schools, and in museums. Go and read it for yourself. We all have access and there's no need for additional clutter here. Stay on topic. Go find it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:11 am
Oooh, I'm shaking! Please. You people can't even make a convincing forged birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:12 am
Uh NO there is no problem.
Do loosen your tinfoil hat.
There has been NO Constitutional definition of “natural born” and no one gives a flying f.
That so called explanation of your was just more birther nonsense.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:14 am
[...] Is This The Source of the Forged Kenyan Birth Certficate? By David Weigel, The Washington Independent, Aug. 3, 2009. (Similarities to Australian forms easily available online.) [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:14 am
Also, McCain was white and conservative, so the birthers weren't concerned.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:16 am
Wandering_Joe GIVE ME MY COOKIE. BEST WAY TO GET TO A LIBERAL CONFUSE THEM WITH FACTS AND DOCUMENTS
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:16 am
Hey, TP loosen your tinfoil hat. You haven't shown anything. Stop reaching.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:18 am
Really? Well, I sure hope that Orally Taintz tries to introduce this “document” in a court of law. What's the sentence for faking evidence? LOL, please please PLEASE try to take this “document” to court! We Liberals are begging you.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:20 am
Stop rewriting SCOTUS interpretations. I'm not going to even bother trying to show you just had badly wrong you are, you DON'T want to be wrong, so nothing will dissuade you but keep living in your delusional world that you understand what the SCOTUS “really” meant. The rest of us can read English just fine (and better than you)
I've read the case law cited and you haven't got a clue, but keep deluding yourself. You can only help keep democrats in office and Obama another four years by keeping up this idiocy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:22 am
Furthermore, McCain was born in Panama which, at the time of his birth until the Carter Administration, was US territory due to the fact that the US built the Panama Canal after the French surrendered to an army of mosquitos.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:22 am
Here you go, btok. Enjoy:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/const…
I'm always in favor of folks getting informed. ;-)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:24 am
LULU Why do you have to bring race in to it People should be judged by their character not their race.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:25 am
Hey Orly, hear that flushing sound…?
Yep, it's your legal career headed where it belongs…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:26 am
If the forgers movement had a small amount of the curiosity regarding the fake COLB that was purported to prove the usurpers eligibility as they do for this document we could have an interesting conversation.
Alas, only things and events that comport with their dogma is worthy of consideration. No critical thinking.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:27 am
If you're a HotAir reader who's wondering why HotAir is promoting David Schuster, it gets even worse: HotAir is passing up a golden opportunity to discredit the MSM and groups like the SPLC. And, they can do that without engaging in any “birther theories”. All HotAir would have to do would be to tell the truth, and they could help me discredit far-left groups like the SPLC.
A few weeks ago, CNN broadcast a report that outrageously lied: they claimed that HI's governor had verified that Obama was born there. Just one problem: HI's governor has never issued a statement verifying that Obama was born there. Not only that, but HI's governor sends out a form letter in which she points out that it would be illegal for her to verify Obama was born there.
And, you don't have to engage in “birther theories” to point out that CNN lied: all you have to do is tell the truth. HI's governor never issued the statement that CNN claimed. That's very cut-and-dried, and doesn't involve “birther theories”.
Unfortunately, the problem is that people like Ed Morrissey and Allahpundit can't (or won't) see that. Rather than smacking down the MSM, they're promoting MSNBC. They need your help: write them and try to help them understand that – without engaging in “birther theories” – they can help me discredit the MSM.
Note also that several other sources went on to rely on CNN's report. In fact, the SPLC – in their press release calling for Lou Dobbs to be fired – referred to it as an example of good journalism. I want CNN to issue a correction, and that would help make CNN, several other MSM sources, and the SPLC look bad. Why isn't HotAir helping me in that but is instead promoting MSNBC? Write them and ask.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:28 am
“Birthers” are chemically imbalanced nut jobs holding on for dear life to anything that they feel will get the first black president out of office. The issue with the birth certificate is just a cover for the over abundant amount of prejudice that runs rampant among them. The longer they press this issue, the more they look unstable. Neo-Consvervatives cant say they hate black people for fear of repercussions from the more logical and sane public……so they latch on to anything, no matter how stupid it sounds. I consider myself an independent, I don't agree with some things both Democrats and Republicans do. I am white, so there is no bias as to defending Obama as president. But watching from the sidelines, the “birthers” are more of a circus freek show than a group of concerned citizens with a legitimate gripe and this will alienate the Republican party further in the depths of extreme right wing-ism. It is becoming more of a cult following than a political party. Acquaintances from Europe find it comical that such a large movement of idiots exist while I am embarrassed at how some Americans can be such uneducated imbeciles.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:29 am
Don’t you ever get anything right? I didn’t find it at all. Hanen found it before the Politijab post.
GEEZ!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:29 am
Don’t you ever get anything right? I didn’t find it at all. Hanen found it before the Politijab post.
GEEZ!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:34 am
Every time a birther is shown a web link to, or hard copy of Obama's official birth certificate (you know, the one that is recognized by the federal government when applying for a passport), they pull the equivalent of a 9-year old covering his ears and shouting “nyah, nyah, nyah, I can't hear you!”
You can lead right wingers to the truth, but you cannot make them embrace it.
Each state has its own standard for an official record of birth.
You have to look at the motivations of the majority of the birthers to understand why they simply cannot “let go”. Fundamentally, it comes down to the following mindset: “I cannot accept THAT man in the White House because…. (fill in the blank).”
Just about ANY reason will do — any excuse that will legitimize their race-based outrage. If it wasn't about a birth certificate, it would be about his middle name. (He's a closet Muslim, you know.)
In addition, there are a handful of unscrupulous politicians and pundits who, although not necessarily racist themselves, have no problem capitalizing on the bigotry of others by fueling their fear and hatred of Obama in order to score political points or further a personal agenda.
The birther phenomenon is intended to damage the validity of the Obama Administration, but it will instead diminish the credibility of the conservative base so long as its members continue to give credence to the deluded fantasy that the POTUS was not born in Hawaii.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:34 am
Other countries have always thought Americans were stupid. Then they went to the polls on 09/08 and proved the other countries were right.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:37 am
LOL Still on the racism thing? Sorry but it has lost it's power as the ultimate excuse for failures. Now a loser is simply a loser. In any color.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:38 am
COLB is not accepted for a US Passport get your facts right
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:38 am
Why do obots always resort to the lowest form of argument? An ad hominem attack requires no basis other than the attackers own prejudice.
It is clear that all the calls of racism and questioning others mental capacity is merely projection. Dim-witted racists, like seotoro/obama/whowever-he-is and his supporters here, embody the traits they decry in others.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:40 am
As a scientist (yes, Ph.D. and all that), I am skeptical of EVERYTHING!!! I am skeptical of Obama's “natural born citizen” due to the fact that he could have ended the controversy months ago by providing an ACTUAL birth certificate which includes the hospital of birth and the attending physician. I am skeptical of the “Birthers'” claims due to the fact that they are all conservatives and libertarians who have always opposed Obama and, since the election (in which I held my nose and voted for McCain), have been grasping to straws as vehemently as hard-core Al Gores have beeen doing since the 2000 election!!!
In short, I don't know. I haven't been convinced one way or the other (come on Obama, be as TRANSPARENT as you promised during your campaign!!!).
Both extremes seem to be hiding stuff for example, in the Cook case in which the Birthers neglect to disclose that Cook volunteered for deployment, therefore, when the case was dropped it was NOT because Obama would not disclose his “true” birth certificate, but because Army regulations (I am an Army civilian scientist and a National Guard Soldier for full disclosure) say that an officer who volunteers for deployment can opt out of the deployment before his deployment date!!!
In the middle, the rotten fish smell lingers, but its location cannot be determined.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:40 am
Totally wrong. The rest of the world breathed a sigh of relief that US citizens had finally got a collective IQ higher than room temperature.
The way the American people accepted the stolen 2000 and 2004 confirmed the world's view that Americans are stupid gutless cowards whose only skill is using high technology to destroy other people.
I suggest you learn something about other countries and their attitudes before you start mouthing off about things you don't understand.
Oh, and what happened in 09/08 (you mean September 2008, I take it)? I thought the polls were in November?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:44 am
Well, according to this alleged birth certificate, both of Obama's parents were citizens of the US. And, no, military bases in other parts of the world are NOT automatically considered US soil.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:47 am
COLB = Birth Certificate in Hawaii & is accepted as proof of citizenship.
Aloha
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:48 am
I suggest all you libs on here get Kevin Jackson's book “THE BIG BLACK LIE”. Lincoln never freed the slaves because the dems have kept them slaves for years living on the dole. The dems do not like black people they just want you to think they are on your side, for your vote. WAKE UP!!! The dems take your dignity and self worth from you. All people are created equal and have a fair shot to achieve in the USA think about it
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:48 am
Ironic that the birthers forge a BC after accusing Obama of doing it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:49 am
Good job explaining what’s actually happening in America.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:49 am
Good job explaining what’s actually happening in America.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:49 am
Its the only logical explanation that could explain why this issue…is well….still an issue. Any educated person that graduated school would know that the birth certificate provided by the “birthers” is not real. There are a few people that I know personally that believe that Obama was born in Africa AND he is Muslim. 2 of them are rednecks so you really cant count them, but the other 3 are neo-conservatives. Complete Jesus freaks and to me admitted to hating black people (yet will never openly admit to it because it will give there cause less validity). I have yet to meet one normal person that believes Obama was not born in the US.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:50 am
Uh, if you had an Australian Birth Certificate – you’d know that each State issues its own certificates. They all look different. They also look different based upon when you obtain your copy of the birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:50 am
Uh, if you had an Australian Birth Certificate – you’d know that each State issues its own certificates. They all look different. They also look different based upon when you obtain your copy of the birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:53 am
I originally dismissed the idea that he was ineligible as too far fetched. Then I became agnostic, now unless evidence to the contrary is proven as fact in the real world I have come to believe he is the tip of the spear of the biggest fraud in history.
His entire past is almost void of objective data.
In truth there is no evidence that he is even a small portion of what he says he is. And his actions since ascending to the oval office have proven him to me a liar at best.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:57 am
I hate to say it….but the document in question looks nothing like an an Australlian Birth certificate (or certified copy of registration of Birth) from that era…..I have both from this time period.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:58 am
@superdave – I'm skeptical that you're skeptical. “As a scientist”, is this how you usually regard evidence–you ignore that it exists? How about Obama's genuine birth certificate that has been corroborated independently countless times? Or do you expect someone to knock at your door and present it to you in person?
The research question that your comment presents is, “Why do some people persist in remaining confused in what is otherwise a straightforward matter?”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:58 am
Regardless if he's a “Natural Born Citizen” or not, Obama is already the biggest fraud in history.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:00 am
Wow. I'm skeptical your PhD is worth the paper it's printed on.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:01 am
Easy, moi. You can tell from looking at the threads that the comments bear little relation to the articles to which the comments are appended.
People just write what they want. One person a little while ago wrote about term limits.
I thought contraryskeptic’s post was interesting and worth reading.
I appreciate that you were polite in your attempt to set another person straight.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:09 am
Don’t feel constrained by the either-or nature of Name’s last question.
“Yes,” for example, would be an appropriate response.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:09 am
Don’t feel constrained by the either-or nature of Name’s last question.
“Yes,” for example, would be an appropriate response.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:09 am
Must you persist in spreading lies?
I got my passport with a COLB. I've never had anything but that (and I just pulled it out of my files to double check).
It is ignorant blathering like this that fuels the idiocy of the birther movement.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:09 am
I personaly don't care where he was born. His father was a UK subject as he said in his book “Dreams of my Father” He was in the US for an education not to become a US citizen. So that alone makes O ineligible for the highest office in the land. And that is according to case law that I posted earlier. He is taking the USA on a downward spiral fast and your freedoms along with it
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:10 am
She did…as part of the Keyes v Obama case!!! Rumor has it that she is also using it as part of an appeal in FL…but that is rumor at this point.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:10 am
Whats really confusing is that all the “real Americans” are fuming over the fact that Obama is not an American and that he is a Muslim (no hard evidence needed, just take there word for it). However, where were these “Real Americans” when Bush was in office pushing America into the economic abyss we find ourselves in now. Once again the double standard is prevalent amongst Republicans. It appears to be that religion, guns and Obama are there sole and primary focus. Meenwhile us “fake Americans” have an agenda of destroying American at any cost. I guess Neo-Conservatives are just too smart for us socialist commies.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:12 am
I came across this rant of a blog on accident and I can't help but laugh! Let's say, just for fun, that Obama was born in Kenya and forged his birth certificate (although I don't believe that for one second). Do you people honestly think that his educational background would not enable him to win any such court case that would result from actually being born in Kenya? Case law and/or law in general is only black and white to those that can see only in black and white. Lawyers are educated to find the grey areas and argue sufficiently. I don't believe Obama would have had to forge a birth certificate when he could potentially win the right, in a court of law, to run for presidency. And I also think that he would have stood his ground and challenged the law, if that is what he had to do, so as to become our legitimate and rightful president.
I know the facts, I know where to find legal precedence and legal documents. And I also know how to read with a discerning eye. Yet I'm not citing all that here and there will be no further defense of my perspective! This is my educated voice of personal opinion not an argumentative thesis. And I also don't think that Obama owes a look at his private documents to any doubting citizen. Due process people! The only place Obama should have to defend himself is in a court of law. Americans elected him and quite frankly, the people I talk to care more about the fact he's well educated than where he was born. I find this blog is a moot point. Thus, if you're hell bent on being proven wrong, take him to court. … In the mean time, whether intentionally or not, thanks for providing me with some laughs. Most of you have been quite entertaining…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:15 am
Interestingly you are claiming that you found the Aussie BC first…6 hours after it was posted on Politijab.com!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:18 am
Seriously? Do I have to teach you the multiplication tables too?
Prove he was an associate at Sidley Austin?
http://www.sidley.com/newsresources/newsandpress/Detail.aspx?news=3804
Prove he was a law professor at the University of Chicago?
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/node/1039
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:18 am
Seriously? Do I have to teach you the multiplication tables too?
Prove he was an associate at Sidley Austin?
http://www.sidley.com/newsresources/newsandpress/Detail.aspx?news=3804
Prove he was a law professor at the University of Chicago?
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/node/1039
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:19 am
“Sorry I ment 11/08 You moron! just a typo”
If you’re going to insult someone else’s intelligence for pointing out, politely, what you are now calling a typo (how’d you fuck up when typing 11/08 and somehow type 09/08? when you mean to type “your” and you type “yoru,” that’s a typo. what you did is called not fucking knowing when an election happened)…
then at least spell “ment” correctly. You moron!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:19 am
“Sorry I ment 11/08 You moron! just a typo”
If you’re going to insult someone else’s intelligence for pointing out, politely, what you are now calling a typo (how’d you fuck up when typing 11/08 and somehow type 09/08? when you mean to type “your” and you type “yoru,” that’s a typo. what you did is called not fucking knowing when an election happened)…
then at least spell “ment” correctly. You moron!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:19 am
Bush made a lot of mistakes as did Clinton so on and on. But you have to remember Congress runs the country and the republicans and dems went on a spending spree with our money “We The People” and now the people are fighting back. We need term limits no more career law makers VOTE THEM ALL OUT!!! Teach them a lesson they won't forget
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:20 am
ATTENTION EVERYBODY! Obama was born in HAWAI'I, not Mombasa, Zanzibar or whereever the Full Mooners say he was born. In fact, one source said that the “Kenya BC” is actually an Austrailian BC, SO LET'S TALK ABOUT THE HEALTH CARE WE NEEDED 15 YEARS AGO!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:22 am
So which one is fake, or are they both authentic? Which one was “cloned” from which one, and can anyone prove it? Were they both created under the jurisdiction of the UK, and could it be all UK birth certificates at the time used the same blank form? The link to the original “.jpg” from which poster “Koyan” claims he made this discovery
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/Da…
gives a “404 file not found” error message…was it pulled now that it has done its job?
If Mr. Obama would simply release the sealed records, the issue could be resolved. What is he hiding, this “transparent” President?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:25 am
Thank you for slogging through all that claptrap. Liked the bit about zero to self-contradictory in 2 sentences.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:25 am
Thank you for slogging through all that claptrap. Liked the bit about zero to self-contradictory in 2 sentences.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:25 am
You forgot the homosexuals, which “are worse than terrorists”. Wow… my committed, monogamous relationship with ONE man will shred the fabric of the nation. If that's the case, what gossamer threads must the U.S. be made of?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:29 am
The fact that people don’t bother responding to your lies, except to tell you what a piece of shit you are for lying, ought to tell you something, doofus.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:29 am
The fact that people don’t bother responding to your lies, except to tell you what a piece of shit you are for lying, ought to tell you something, doofus.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:29 am
HotAir readers:
Continuing with my discussion below, about a week ago a NY Daily News columnist said this: The [authenticity of Obama's] official Hawaii birth certificate [was] vouched for by Hawaii officials up to and including Republican Gov. Linda Lingle.
The problem with that statement is that it's completely false. HI's governor never said any such thing. You can hate “Birthers” with a passion and still point out that the NY Daily News columnist was lying. You don't have to engage in any “birther theories” to point out that the NY Daily News columnist was lying.
So, why aren't Ed Morrissey and Allahpundit doing that? Why instead are they promoting David Schuster?
Please write HotAir and ask them to help me discredit the MSM.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:35 am
I think he probably was born in HI but doesn't want to release his birth cert. for some other reason. Maybe it says religion Muslim on it or something like that.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:36 am
“‘It’s crazy,’ said Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health. ‘I don’t think anything is ever going to satisfy them.’
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. ‘If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.’”
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-movement-picks-up-steam
THAT is what makes me think that.
What made you lie about the COLB? It states he was born in Honolulu. That’s a “where.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:36 am
“‘It’s crazy,’ said Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health. ‘I don’t think anything is ever going to satisfy them.’
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. ‘If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.’”
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-movement-picks-up-steam
THAT is what makes me think that.
What made you lie about the COLB? It states he was born in Honolulu. That’s a “where.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:36 am
This is all the proof I need that Barack Obama was born in Australia.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:38 am
[...] One of my friends in the small community of Obama “birther”-debunkers passes on quite the discovery: a 1964 “certified copy of registration of birth” from Australia, easily available on Bomford.net, a genealogy site. … See the rest here: The Washington Independent » Is This the Source of the Forged … [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:40 am
Get a life you dimwits. This has been and is a dead story. Go back to chasing UFOs, the Sasquatch, the second gunman on the grassy knoll, the antichrist, and god knows whatever else springs from cretin minds with lots of time.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:43 am
Oh, yeah didnt homosexuals cause Katrina? Someone actually said that. I guess God was really pissed and need to punish everyone indiscriminately.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:50 am
Amy, the “deported” part is the best. Are you also denying that his mom was an American citizen?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:51 am
I am with you on that. I am not a fan of Republicans nor much a fan of the Democrats either. Both parties have been tainted with the greed of lobbyist. Very few laws are passed with the American in mind, rather industry and banking sectors over saturate D.C with money flung at congressman from every angle. That is why this whole “birthers” thing seems so trivial with so many real issues to deal with.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:52 am
I guessed it was a typo. The trouble is, that little typos like that get pounced on as evidence that either the writer doesn't know wtf (s)he is talking about, or else that they are outright lying.
And thank you for spelling “moron” correctly. I hate being called a moron by someone who can't spell the word!
By the way… This was a real British national tabloid cover from 2004:
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/…
In 2000, just before the election, another British tabloid ran 10cm (4-inch for Americans) headlines pleading DON'T DUMP DUBYA ON US!
My mother (a conservative by British standards, but a raving radical by American standards) said to me on September 13 after Americans were having their Bush-inspired wargasm, “Americans are still children aren't they? They haven't grown up yet.”
Only when Obama was elected did most non-Americans start to have respect for the USA again. However, this whole “birther” business seems to mean that right-wing Americans are determined to keep their rightful place as Toilet Cleaners of the Free World – their intelligence doesn't allow them to take any better jobs.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:57 am
@Udontnome – absolutely. This is a classic example of pointing at the sun while pissing on your shoes.
To be frank, I'm surprised not more bankers/insurance execs/etc. have been found swinging from lampposts. No-one wants lynch law, but given the American fondness for extreme violence and the 2nd amendment, I'm surprised Bubba's not more pissed than he actually is. The whole ridiculous “birther” business provides him with something to hate, while he is distracted from the fact that he and his whole family are being raped wholesale at the expense of the top 0.5%.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:57 am
That explains why the passport office is so screwed up. ;)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:04 am
Utterly wrong. Or have you forgotten about all the children of illegal immigrants who were born in America and automatically have American citizenship? *They* are natural-born citizens, which is why they can’t be deported along with their parents. Obama is no different, and this birther nonsense is nothing but veiled racism.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:04 am
Utterly wrong. Or have you forgotten about all the children of illegal immigrants who were born in America and automatically have American citizenship? *They* are natural-born citizens, which is why they can’t be deported along with their parents. Obama is no different, and this birther nonsense is nothing but veiled racism.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:04 am
I agree with your mother> Duba was not quite as bad a O but it is becoming a toss up. I am not right or left just try to use common sense that most Americans seem to have lost. Don't bother to answer. I bid you Goodnight and God Bless. Had enough fun tonight
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:06 am
Did you get your Ph.D. from the same fine institution of higher learning patronized by Orly Taitz?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:06 am
Did you get your Ph.D. from the same fine institution of higher learning patronized by Orly Taitz?
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:08 am
[...] Just when you think the Birthers could not get any sillier (for example Orly Taitz’s MSNBC interview in which she says “WHARGARBL!” over and over), comes the revelation that the supposed Obama Kenyan birth certificate is a forgery. [...]
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:10 am
[...] to create a phony Kenyan "birth certificate" for Obama. The deception seems to have been uncovered by a blogger. The web site has exceeded its allowed usage and is now down. Mr Bomford, self-described as a [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:20 am
Pretty clear from http://www.bomford.net that the site was brought down, doofus.
Try http://www.bomford.net.nyud.net/worcestershire/…, and next time learn the interwebs.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:43 am
Probably more for several reasons:
1) He doesn't have to.
2) There's no reason for him to.
3) Anyone sane doesn't need him to; anyone else won't believe it anyway.
4) If he responds to this, it opens the floodgates for all manner of other frivolous requests.
5) It's more fun this way.
If it says “religion Muslim”: big whoop. That'd be what his parents (neither of whom were Muslim, by the way) would have put, not what he practices or believes today.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:45 am
You must be joking. You're not aware that we have birthright citizenship in the U.S.? Are you suffering from stupidity or mendacity?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:48 am
The anger in the US is really something. It is like a macabre insanity, It is one thing to be angry if your child is blown to bits from a military strike or if every every family you know has a dead member from war strife, but to go berserk ( the only name for it) because a black man with the middle name of Hussein handily wins the popular vote in 'the freest, most democratic society on the world' ??? – what's that about.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:50 am
It's likely that Pres. Obama does not have the original copy of his birth certificate. Have never seen my original birth certificate.
Second, does anyone really believe that a white American woman would move to Kenya to give birth? That's suicidal.
What is on his birth certificate are dates. Pres. Obama was conceived before his parents were married.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:54 am
The Australian one is internally consistent; the “Kenyan” one is not. The Australian one can be found at http://archive.org , indicating that it's been around for awhile.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:08 am
um hon? This is an ANTI-birthers piece. So your declarations of reading with a discerning eye cast a rather ironic note on your comment, considering you can't even get the point of the piece you're ridiculing. But have a nice day anyway.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:13 am
you don't have to be born “in America” to be an American citizen. His mother was a citizen, that was enough.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:20 am
LOOKING FOR WORK
>> >
>> > A Mexican doctor says 'Medicine in my country is so advanced that
>> > we can take a kidney out of one man, put it in another, and have
>> > him looking for work in six weeks.'
>> >
>> > A German doctor says 'That is nothing; we can take a lung out of
>> > one person, put it in another, and have him looking for work in four > weeks.'
>> >
>> > A Russian doctor says 'In my country, medicine is so advanced
>> > that we can take half a heart out of one person, put it in another,
>> > and have them both looking for work in two weeks.'
>> >
An ILLINOIS doctor threatened with socialized medicine admitted,
All 'Youse guys are way behind recent accomplishments.
Illinois recently sent a man with no brains to DC.
He resided in the White House only THREE MONTHS.
Before half the WORLD started looking for work
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:20 am
You'r kidding right?
Have you bothered to read The Constitution?
DUH!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:23 am
obama loved to ride in the limo with larry sinclair and rev wright, doing crack, and each other! This is an old kenyan custom started by obama's muslim father this is how they prepare male children for life! barry is a born from the hole of his cracker mamma and that rug of a head daddy step-in fetch-it!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:26 am
All the proof I need that Obama was born in Hawaii is his birth certificate and not his COLB that can be obtained without being born there.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:32 am
there is no Federal requirement that a natural born American citizen even have a birth certificate. I doubt that President Lincoln had one – and no one doubted he was a natgural born American. Remember the entries of birth records in family Bibles and similar documents. They are legally valid evidence of what their entries say.
Also, by the way. according to Islamic law Obama is technically a Muslim, whether he likes it or not, because he was born of a father who was a Muslim (it doesn't matter if the father didn't think of himself as a Muslim so long as his father was a Muslim, etc.). The fact that he “renounced” his birthright religion merely makes him an apostate, which is a crime punishable by death in many Muslim countries.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:34 pm
Kenyancitizen- He shouldn’t have misrepresented the fact that he was born in Kenya. Alot of People still love him and would be willing to have the Constituition changed for him, but he pretty much knocked that option to out of reach. He would now have to confess and bow down on his knees and ask for forgiveness to be deported to Kenya rather than face a criminal trial.
Incidentally, have you heard him call for a complete and thorough investigation into this matter?
Has he made a speech to the American People saying “He is my Long/Form BC, I am an American and I am Proud to have been born in Hawaii”…. nope and you won’t either. He is more
proud of his African heritage. And if given a chance he would announce to the world “proud to be a Kenyan”!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:34 pm
Kenyancitizen- He shouldn’t have misrepresented the fact that he was born in Kenya. Alot of People still love him and would be willing to have the Constituition changed for him, but he pretty much knocked that option to out of reach. He would now have to confess and bow down on his knees and ask for forgiveness to be deported to Kenya rather than face a criminal trial.
Incidentally, have you heard him call for a complete and thorough investigation into this matter?
Has he made a speech to the American People saying “He is my Long/Form BC, I am an American and I am Proud to have been born in Hawaii”…. nope and you won’t either. He is more
proud of his African heritage. And if given a chance he would announce to the world “proud to be a Kenyan”!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:34 am
A person's action tells ali what
no peace of paper could know
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:38 am
[...] David Weigel seems to have found the source of that Kenyan birth record: an Australian birth record taken from an Internet genealogy site. By JDZ Feedbacks on this entry via RSS 2.0 Please leave a Comment or discuss via Trackback! One Feedback on "Well, That Settles It" meaux [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:41 am
“NO”, answered the White House when asked,
“Is there any evidence the White House can release to settle the “Birther” claim”
Where's the controversy?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:43 pm
Sorry, Jack, you’re wrong. In TWO ways;
First. a COLB from Hawaii would NOT say he was born in Hawaii; that would be fraud.
Second, the ability to register foreign births on Hawaiian COLB’s didn’t happen until 20 years after Obama’s birth.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:43 pm
Sorry, Jack, you’re wrong. In TWO ways;
First. a COLB from Hawaii would NOT say he was born in Hawaii; that would be fraud.
Second, the ability to register foreign births on Hawaiian COLB’s didn’t happen until 20 years after Obama’s birth.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:43 am
[...] One small problem: the document in question is quite clearly an altered copy of an Australian birth certificate. [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:49 am
If the US would just drop the citizenship requirement
the Terminator could do for the US what he did for call eh porn eh ah or
Acorn could elect a really conservative Shiite pres.direct from you wait or saw de or eye rack.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Fabricating? I SAW a debate on Crossfire about it. The reason I remember it was that Bill Press had a great one-liner. He said I’ll trade you; I’ll let you amend the Constitution to allow Arnold to run if you allow me to amend it to allow Bill Clinton to run for a 3rd term.
Secondly, you should never say never; you can’t know what every Republican said at any time. Just ONE example disproves your claim. (And I’ve provided it).
Finally, it’s QUINTESSENTIAL.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Fabricating? I SAW a debate on Crossfire about it. The reason I remember it was that Bill Press had a great one-liner. He said I’ll trade you; I’ll let you amend the Constitution to allow Arnold to run if you allow me to amend it to allow Bill Clinton to run for a 3rd term.
Secondly, you should never say never; you can’t know what every Republican said at any time. Just ONE example disproves your claim. (And I’ve provided it).
Finally, it’s QUINTESSENTIAL.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:54 am
agree! Amazing how much ignorance and hate there still is. I am afraid that Obama election has only awakened the ignorant and uneducated red necks that look to blame others for their sorry lives than themselves. In the meantime the US has become a joke after 8 years of Cheney/Bush. We have more hate than ever, we are more stupid than before, we are much much fatter than ever, and we owe way too much money to China.
More people should focus on doing good to help our Country back. But sadly there is a pre-occupation with Race, blaming others, stuffing their face,and defending the right to bear M-16's and grenade launchers, exactly the thing our forefathers had in mind when they drafted the constitution.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:55 am
That's mighty white of you, tpgow! I mean, you have Mike Steele and 7 other blacks in your Party and you show them how much respect you have for Obama…I'm betting they'll be flocking to the GOP next election cycle. And hispanics, too! Because nothing says “big tent” like voting against Sotomayor and letting Tom Tecrando do hispanic outreach! LOL. Plus the young folks…and women. You're gonna enjoy your long hike into the wilderness.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:58 pm
Wow, your favorite show must be “Short Attention Span Theatre 3000″. We’ve been in a recession for the last 2 years, Obama’s been on the job for 6 months, and suddenly HE’S responsible for a global recession.
So tell me, how exactly did Obama cause these job losses? Or is it the same reasoning that blamed him for the stock market fall, even before he took office. Can you at least give him credit for the 2,000 point rise SINCE he’s taken over?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:58 pm
Wow, your favorite show must be “Short Attention Span Theatre 3000″. We’ve been in a recession for the last 2 years, Obama’s been on the job for 6 months, and suddenly HE’S responsible for a global recession.
So tell me, how exactly did Obama cause these job losses? Or is it the same reasoning that blamed him for the stock market fall, even before he took office. Can you at least give him credit for the 2,000 point rise SINCE he’s taken over?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:02 pm
Again, nice try. Attacking the person (who disagrees with you) instead of the idea simply shows that you know how weak your argument is. Now a question: With all of that education you purport to have, did they ever teach you the difference between intelligence and education?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:02 pm
Again, nice try. Attacking the person (who disagrees with you) instead of the idea simply shows that you know how weak your argument is. Now a question: With all of that education you purport to have, did they ever teach you the difference between intelligence and education?
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:03 am
[...] To their glee, the “birthers” have discovered via the internet, a 1964 “Republic of Kenya” birth certificate, dated BEFORE there was a Republic of Kenya. We’ve seen Ashton Kushner in the Obama celebrity entourage. Could it be possible that the “birthers” have been “punked” with this Kenyan birth certificate? Apparently so, according Markos of Daily Kos. [Read the debunking analysis here.] And it turns out, the source of the forged Republic of Kenya birth certificate is Australia. [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:08 am
Seems like only a couple of years ago, Republicans were ready to revisit the 'natural born' Constitutional issue for their darling, Arnold Schwartzeneggar. Amazing the intellectual consistency of conservatives. Almost as consistent as their moral virtues.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:18 am
You are making the point that a document only available for public view online is easily manupulated.
You get my point?
Obama can end all of this by making his real birth certifice available for public inspection. Why doesn't he do that? It is a cynical ploy to keep this issue in the news to distract from his policy failures or what?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:18 am
The link is to the Coral Cache of the original page. It should be populated through most of the CDN, but I think it's possible that it hasn't reached your nearest node yet. Also, I'm not sure how Coral handles 404 errors over time, but for now it's returning a perfect cache of the original image when accessed here in Maine.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:27 pm
Perhaps not the Governor, but the person in charge of the records vouched for it:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen,” Fukino said in a statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008, over eight months ago.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:27 pm
Perhaps not the Governor, but the person in charge of the records vouched for it:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen,” Fukino said in a statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008, over eight months ago.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:29 am
Scratch that, the CDN has updated to the 404… oh well
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:32 am
@ jamesdecatur , get your head out of the sand. His “real” actual original authenticated birth certiifcate has been posted on the internet for all to see. Several months ago.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:32 am
As mentioned by @hcv, archive.org holds several snapshots of the site, e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20070205211559/http:…
Unfortunately, they did not cache the image itself, but it's all over the web by now.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:49 pm
Better do a Google before you accuse people of lying, Till. Took me about ten seconds to find that Republicans indeed were trying to get the rules changed for The governor of California
Senator Hatch Republican of Utah, introduced a bill in 2003 called the “Equal Right to Govern” act.
This act would allow people who were Naturalized citizens for at least 20 years to run for President. Schwartznegger had been a Naturalized citizen since 1983.
Full story is in the 2004-12-02 edition of USA Today.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:49 pm
Better do a Google before you accuse people of lying, Till. Took me about ten seconds to find that Republicans indeed were trying to get the rules changed for The governor of California
Senator Hatch Republican of Utah, introduced a bill in 2003 called the “Equal Right to Govern” act.
This act would allow people who were Naturalized citizens for at least 20 years to run for President. Schwartznegger had been a Naturalized citizen since 1983.
Full story is in the 2004-12-02 edition of USA Today.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:54 pm
That doesn’t square with my understanding of the facts, which is that he was born in a US military hospital. Where’s your link showing that Colon Hospital was “never part of the Canal Zone”?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:54 pm
That doesn’t square with my understanding of the facts, which is that he was born in a US military hospital. Where’s your link showing that Colon Hospital was “never part of the Canal Zone”?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
IF this is a criterion, explain how SIX previous presidents had only one American parent; in fact, Andrew Jackson had TWO Irish-immigrant parents. Chester Arthur, Woodrow Wilson, Herbert Hoover etc., etc only had ONE American parent.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
IF this is a criterion, explain how SIX previous presidents had only one American parent; in fact, Andrew Jackson had TWO Irish-immigrant parents. Chester Arthur, Woodrow Wilson, Herbert Hoover etc., etc only had ONE American parent.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:02 pm
McCain was born in the Coco Solo Naval Hospital located on the US Naval Base in 1936, which was part of the Canal Zone. Some have looked at the current location of the Coco Solo Naval Hospital, built in 1941, which is located within boundry of the Canal Zone, but was in territory of the two cities excluded from the Canal Zone until annexed in 1941, and concluded that McCain was born outside the territory, but they are clearly wrong (a US military base qualifies on its own, even if they were right about Canal Zone boundries). The Supreme court ruled in 1964 that those born in US territories were US Citizens in response to Goldwater running (he was born in Arizona before it was a state).
In Robinson vs Bowen case in US District court in Riverside, California, judge decided McCain was a citizen, though there was wiggle room if someone wanted to appeal, but no one did.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:02 pm
McCain was born in the Coco Solo Naval Hospital located on the US Naval Base in 1936, which was part of the Canal Zone. Some have looked at the current location of the Coco Solo Naval Hospital, built in 1941, which is located within boundry of the Canal Zone, but was in territory of the two cities excluded from the Canal Zone until annexed in 1941, and concluded that McCain was born outside the territory, but they are clearly wrong (a US military base qualifies on its own, even if they were right about Canal Zone boundries). The Supreme court ruled in 1964 that those born in US territories were US Citizens in response to Goldwater running (he was born in Arizona before it was a state).
In Robinson vs Bowen case in US District court in Riverside, California, judge decided McCain was a citizen, though there was wiggle room if someone wanted to appeal, but no one did.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:03 am
Except for you can't get a COLB without being born there unless you believe websites written by nitwits incapable of understanding the laws written decades after the dates in question. A Hawaiian COLB can get you a passport and is recognized by the State Department as proof that someone was born in the US. What Obama released is the ONLY official birth certificate the state of Hawaii presently gives out, and its been approved as proof of citizenship. It can get you a passport, which is about as concrete a proof of citizenship as one can get. Do you really think the US Department of State has such willy-nilly, easily falsified ways to get a passport? If so, why doesn't every illegal immigrant get one this way? Or does it make more sense that some “lawyer” who got her “degree” from a website and isn't even a member of the American Bar Association is incapable of understanding basic legalese?
The simple fact is you hate Obama and there is nothing else to it. Just admit that. I hated Bush. There is nothing wrong with disliking the president. Almost 50% of voters voted for the other guy in most elections anyway. Heck, in 2000, more than 50% did!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:05 pm
He released his birth certificate. Check your facts.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:05 pm
He released his birth certificate. Check your facts.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:08 am
There is a very nice comparison of the Australian docments and the forgery here:
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9981/kenyaau…
The key thing that gives it away is the fact that the book numbers are the same. “Book 44B Page 5733″. It is very unlikely that a birth certificate from Kenya and one from Australia would have the same book numbers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
1. Nobel Prize is so IMPORTANT. Al Gore got one and he thinks the world is going to end through Global Warming and HE invented the internet.
2. You are right. The DEMS controlled the house for the last two years under Bush when the housing crises exploded. Under Clinton, when we had a surplus the House was controlled by the Rep, the last 6 years of his administration. And under Reagan and Bush 1, the House was controlled by the Democrats.
3. You said two points but you made three. Obama apologize to everybody but our best allies. To England and to Israel he snubs them.
Your points are good, all for the Republicans
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
1. Nobel Prize is so IMPORTANT. Al Gore got one and he thinks the world is going to end through Global Warming and HE invented the internet.
2. You are right. The DEMS controlled the house for the last two years under Bush when the housing crises exploded. Under Clinton, when we had a surplus the House was controlled by the Rep, the last 6 years of his administration. And under Reagan and Bush 1, the House was controlled by the Democrats.
3. You said two points but you made three. Obama apologize to everybody but our best allies. To England and to Israel he snubs them.
Your points are good, all for the Republicans
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:15 am
[...] fake Kenyan birth certificate being shopped around by the birthers yesterday looks like it was copied from an Australian birth certificate. So does that make Obama a New Zealander? (Washington [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:16 pm
Look in the mirror. Idiots like you are the problem with this country. Obama is a joke and so are his worshippers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:16 pm
Look in the mirror. Idiots like you are the problem with this country. Obama is a joke and so are his worshippers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:19 pm
The section on the meaning of what “natural born” MEANT to the Framers has never been changed. The evidence is patently clear. The Framers accepted both “jus soli” and jus sanguinus” as constituting “natural born”. That was their intent of the meaning of “natural born”…it wasn’t the same as “native born”.
lthough other aspects of the Constitution can be altered by an act this aspect cannot be repealed without a Constitutional Amendment. It has been modified somewhat by the l4th, l5th and l8th Amendments but this broa dened the definition of who Constituted full citizens by “jus soli” (blacks and women)…thus their descendents were granted the rights by jus sanguinus (blood descent) that formerly was restricted to White men.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:19 pm
But Robinson v. Bowen was thrown out; the judge didn’t hear any evidence re McCain; btw, McCain never showed his BC, and was not part of the case. My highly refined bulls*** serves me once again.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:19 pm
But Robinson v. Bowen was thrown out; the judge didn’t hear any evidence re McCain; btw, McCain never showed his BC, and was not part of the case. My highly refined bulls*** serves me once again.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:26 pm
Freedom,
THINK, I know GOP’s are not used to it but try. O is trying to fix what the GOP nut case called W left him. No one knows if his policies will work over the long haul but here is what we do know your guy W had 8 years to show us how stupid his policies are! All the Dems are doing is trying to fix a mess your side left, a mess the likes of which have never been seen before so shut up hold on and pray the GOP doesn’t screw up the fix as they seem to like this sorry mess where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. They just want to reduce the number of rich so controling them will be easier.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:26 pm
Freedom,
THINK, I know GOP’s are not used to it but try. O is trying to fix what the GOP nut case called W left him. No one knows if his policies will work over the long haul but here is what we do know your guy W had 8 years to show us how stupid his policies are! All the Dems are doing is trying to fix a mess your side left, a mess the likes of which have never been seen before so shut up hold on and pray the GOP doesn’t screw up the fix as they seem to like this sorry mess where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. They just want to reduce the number of rich so controling them will be easier.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
Wait until Bamsters 4 years are up. They will be judged the worst in history. Jimmy Carter will be so relieved.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
Wait until Bamsters 4 years are up. They will be judged the worst in history. Jimmy Carter will be so relieved.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:29 pm
You’re an idiot–wreckless with your “facts” And have absolutely no grasp ofeconomics.
Reagan’s 1981 business-tax cut and the reductions in personal-income-tax rates in 1982 and 1983 raised the after-tax earnings on real investment in the U.S. relative to the rest of the world. Instead of exporting capital, the U.S. retained it and financed its own deficit.. Unlike today where individuals and businesses are punished with high taxes on income they create outside the US. That’s why an estimated $13 trillion lies in banks outside the US and won’t be coming home anytime soon.
As the budget deficit under Reagan rose, interest rates fell. A good thing for economic growth. I remember the 18% home mortgage loans under Carter.Made home ownership alot more expensive.
Reagan rescued us from Carter’s miserable economy and double digit inflation–bringing inflation down from more than 11% to less than 4%
Supply-side economics made good on its promise—Ronald Reagan delivered both the longest peacetime U.S. expansion and disinflation. This achievement has been buried under a pack of lies told by people whose reputations exceed what their integrity warrants. (From the National Review)
You’ve also inflated the National debt under Reagan by $5.5 Trillion. But then no one expect Liberals to use actual factual material to try to prove a point. The very fact that they make a statement no matter how erroneous should be enough…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:29 pm
You’re an idiot–wreckless with your “facts” And have absolutely no grasp ofeconomics.
Reagan’s 1981 business-tax cut and the reductions in personal-income-tax rates in 1982 and 1983 raised the after-tax earnings on real investment in the U.S. relative to the rest of the world. Instead of exporting capital, the U.S. retained it and financed its own deficit.. Unlike today where individuals and businesses are punished with high taxes on income they create outside the US. That’s why an estimated $13 trillion lies in banks outside the US and won’t be coming home anytime soon.
As the budget deficit under Reagan rose, interest rates fell. A good thing for economic growth. I remember the 18% home mortgage loans under Carter.Made home ownership alot more expensive.
Reagan rescued us from Carter’s miserable economy and double digit inflation–bringing inflation down from more than 11% to less than 4%
Supply-side economics made good on its promise—Ronald Reagan delivered both the longest peacetime U.S. expansion and disinflation. This achievement has been buried under a pack of lies told by people whose reputations exceed what their integrity warrants. (From the National Review)
You’ve also inflated the National debt under Reagan by $5.5 Trillion. But then no one expect Liberals to use actual factual material to try to prove a point. The very fact that they make a statement no matter how erroneous should be enough…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:30 am
Well! You know now days, so many wonderful things can happen to you if you are rich and famous!! cause there are so many more who are not and will definitely try and get a bit of that glamour you have. So, don't worry if someone says that you have been found out and that this and that is about you. The best you can do is to bask in your own limelight and say, well! at least someone is wasting their time today on me and that makes me a little more famous is what the other person does not know. And, beside, there are umteens of sikies today, that will do anything to bring a good name down, just take it as a punch of salt cause, no matter what you do, there will always be something else on you. Enjoy it all as life is short and damn the rest.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:35 pm
Clearly not everybody in the world wants to live in America, but keep fapping to that lie.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:35 pm
Clearly not everybody in the world wants to live in America, but keep fapping to that lie.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:36 pm
1. Yeah, shithead, the Nobel prize is important. Al Gore and about 2,000 scientists think Global Warming is a problem. Who you got, Glen Beck
2. Typical; when Republicans are in the White House, blame congress. When Dems control congress, blame the White House. Whatever happened ot personal responsiblity.
Here’s the problem with arguing with republitards; they can’t grasp complex ideas. Let’s discuss your little shot at Al Gore, JUST FOR THE EXAMPLE IT MAKES!
First, you start with a lie. Then repeat it enough until it takes hold. AL GORE NEVER SAID HE “INVENTED” THE INTERNET. Find a quote that says he did; I dare you. I double-dog dare you. Google search; you know, Al Gore & Internet & Invent. You won’t find it.
Finally, you mock him for it. What he DID do was authorize funding for DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Ad.) who needed a more efficient method of sharing information, so they linked up via phone lines. So, in a way, Gore and hundreds of scientists were RESPONSIBLE for the internet. But he never said he INVENTED it!
Oh, BTW, do you LIKE the internet that allows us to communicate like this? It was first a GOVERNMENT PROGRAM! See. the gov. works sometimes.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:36 pm
1. Yeah, shithead, the Nobel prize is important. Al Gore and about 2,000 scientists think Global Warming is a problem. Who you got, Glen Beck
2. Typical; when Republicans are in the White House, blame congress. When Dems control congress, blame the White House. Whatever happened ot personal responsiblity.
Here’s the problem with arguing with republitards; they can’t grasp complex ideas. Let’s discuss your little shot at Al Gore, JUST FOR THE EXAMPLE IT MAKES!
First, you start with a lie. Then repeat it enough until it takes hold. AL GORE NEVER SAID HE “INVENTED” THE INTERNET. Find a quote that says he did; I dare you. I double-dog dare you. Google search; you know, Al Gore & Internet & Invent. You won’t find it.
Finally, you mock him for it. What he DID do was authorize funding for DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Ad.) who needed a more efficient method of sharing information, so they linked up via phone lines. So, in a way, Gore and hundreds of scientists were RESPONSIBLE for the internet. But he never said he INVENTED it!
Oh, BTW, do you LIKE the internet that allows us to communicate like this? It was first a GOVERNMENT PROGRAM! See. the gov. works sometimes.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:36 am
That's an obfuscating untruth. Republicans have NEVER sought to revisit “natural born.” You are the quentessential democrat, fabricating nonsense to promote your agenda.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:39 pm
“You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist” I never saw any non-white people either.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:39 pm
“You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist” I never saw any non-white people either.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:40 pm
24Ahead: fired by Michelle Malkin for being too fucking crazy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:40 pm
24Ahead: fired by Michelle Malkin for being too fucking crazy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:43 am
As long as you are obsessing over this you aren't paying a bit of attention to the healthcare mess!!!!! Get your heads out of the sand and stand up for the people!!! At least fight for the right to have your health!!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:47 am
…? If you are born of a Kenyan father, irrespective of where you are born in the world, irrespective of what birth certificate or nationality you’ve adopted, you are automatically a Kenyan citizen and you request for that citizenship to be formalized at any point in your life…apart from if you are under the age of 21 when a parent or guardian would be required to apply for you, such as in the case of his two daughters, for example, who also qualify for citizenship….the relevant section of the Kenyan constitution is section 87 (2) which reads…(2) Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th
December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a
British protected person shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his
death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1),
become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963.,”
This citizenship right does not require one to have a birth certificate from Kenya, neither does it negate citizenship rights if one already holds citizenship in another country. Therefore one could have a birth certificate from Hawaii and be a US citizen and still qualify and retain the right to his/her citizenship of Kenya…all a person needs is to establish their father is/was a Kenyan citizen and automatically they get full citizenship. If you have already formally adopted another citizenship you will have to formally renounce your other citizenship in order to take up the Kenyan citizenship. However a modification to the Kenyan constitution has been proposed to make it possible to retain dual citizenship in the near future, so Obama could vote in Kenya legally when this is passed, probably before 2012 and run for President here in 2015.
So for purpose of this debate, note that it isn't necessarily to prove he has a Kenyan birth certificate to prove he is a Kenyan citizen, the constitution of Kenya already says he is as long as his father was Kenyan
… relax, let our Kenyan rule the free world, he will take good care of you….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:48 am
A person who doesn't know how to think rationally or read articles for himself can also be “easily manupulated.”
Whether the online document is capable of being photoshopped is irrelevant. State officials, including the Republican governor of Hawai'i, have agreed with factcheck.org that the paper hard copy of the COLB is authentic.
So, do you have any proof that those people are all lying?
Is your post “a cynical ploy to keep this issue in the news?” I hope so. You're great advertising for Democrats. And spell-check software.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:50 pm
Of course I am reasonable. I don’t need to call True Believers names. I just need to ask a simple question that has not been answered to get folks like you all spun up:
Where’s the Birth Certificate?
You claim I’m asking for “further proof of what is proven” — but the problem is that there has not been any “proof” presented.
Obama refuses to release his original birth certificate — this is irefutable fact. He has also sealed most of his other life records, from his kindergarten records, college records, passport records, medical records, etc …
What is he hiding?
Nor am I making “absurd claims”. I do not claim Obama was born in a foreign country, I’m just asking for simple proof that he was not.
Why doesn’t he release his birth certificate?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:50 pm
Of course I am reasonable. I don’t need to call True Believers names. I just need to ask a simple question that has not been answered to get folks like you all spun up:
Where’s the Birth Certificate?
You claim I’m asking for “further proof of what is proven” — but the problem is that there has not been any “proof” presented.
Obama refuses to release his original birth certificate — this is irefutable fact. He has also sealed most of his other life records, from his kindergarten records, college records, passport records, medical records, etc …
What is he hiding?
Nor am I making “absurd claims”. I do not claim Obama was born in a foreign country, I’m just asking for simple proof that he was not.
Why doesn’t he release his birth certificate?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:51 pm
No, tp, that is an urban legend. Otherwise, every cleaning lady and member of the janitorial staff would try to give birth in our embassies.
Also, I haven’t seen any evidence that McCain was born on a military base; his official bio has him born in Panama, but doesn’t specify on base.
IRONY ALERT! IRONY ALERT! IRONY ALERT! Guess who HASN’T shown his birth certificate? John McCain!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:51 pm
No, tp, that is an urban legend. Otherwise, every cleaning lady and member of the janitorial staff would try to give birth in our embassies.
Also, I haven’t seen any evidence that McCain was born on a military base; his official bio has him born in Panama, but doesn’t specify on base.
IRONY ALERT! IRONY ALERT! IRONY ALERT! Guess who HASN’T shown his birth certificate? John McCain!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:51 am
“High-level political operatives from Arnold 's Schwarzenegger's gubernatorial campaign have commenced a media blitzkrieg propagandizing for a change in the Constitution so Arnold can run for President.
Arnold has said for decades that he wants to amend the Constitution so he can be President. Now, Congressman Dana Rohrbacher, Senator Orin Hatch and others have introduced legislation known in Congress as “Arnold Bills” to give Schwarzenegger what he wants. This has been an obvious, well-focused campaign to mold public opinion in favor of amending the Constitution for Arnold Schwarzenegger.”
http://www.arnoldexposed.com/media.html
So, Rohrbacher and Hatch are non-existent? Because they're Republicans.
Please define “obfuscating untruth.” Or just use your own post as an example. Either way.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:53 am
We in the other parts of the world love to watch americans hate each other for their color, race, language and breed. We love to see you defile your intelligent president to the world and wonder how the hell you ever got to the top when you cannot see further than your noses. Now, for those who are reading this, I know you must be fuming, but this also is accepted, cause you rednecks think that your own shit does not stink and so, try to bring down whoever is above you and not white. Go ahead, make my day from day to day as I watch, read your silly bickerings when there is a president in DC who has been given the wonderful inheritance of a great big mess that the previous Government created. Me thinks, that Obama was destined to be the 44th US President as none other was to willing to take up the previous administration's woes and so, they started to drop out one by one, simply pretending to be in the race for real and poor old John McCain was picked as most knew that he did not stand a chance at all. Think about this for awhile before you begin to critisize President Obama who stood tall, believing that the best was yet to come for America. Most americans I have met, are pretty cool, I guess I'm talking about a small percentage, but that small percentage can destroy the goodness of America as time goes by. As they say… “One bad Apple in a basket of good Apples, can destroy the whole lot.”
God Bless America as I hope the saying will still be there in the future!!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:54 am
Kenyan law does not trump the Constitution of the United States.
We in this country could care less what a foreign nation has to say about its own citizenship laws. Our Constitution requires our president to be born in the United States. The man we elected president, with more votes than any presidential candidate in history, was born in the United States. There's nothing more to the story.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:55 am
If you were born out of state the Hawai'ian government would, in some circumstances, issue you a COLB.
But in no event would they lie about your birth place. Your COLB from Hawai'i would just indicate, for example, that you were born in Florida.
Or, in your case, it'd say you were born last night.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:56 am
He already made his “real birth certificate” available for public inspection.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:57 am
The question wasn't whether there was evidence to “settle” the claim. There is evidence, and the claim has been settled.
The question was whether there was evidence to shut up the birthers. The answer, correctly, was no. The birthers will never shut up regardless of the state of the evidence.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:58 am
Hmmm. All you've done is discredit the people who go around calling everyone liars.
You even do a bad fucking job of THAT, doofus.
What is this now, the fifth or sixth journalist or public figure you've accused of lying?
Your avatar is appropriate. Can you see land from that far out to sea?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:59 am
There's no difference between a COLB and a birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:02 pm
Hi Bruce,
I did not really make any racist remark; you could see that I put the n word
in parenthesis, meaning, I do not sincerely see Mr Obama as anything other
than an American. I, myself am black and I am certainly .one of the best
human beings on earth. In my opinion, the so called “birthers” are the
racists, especially in relation to the Obama birth cert saga, and I tell you
what; if the birthers raised questions about the citizenship of previous
presidents – who were all white – it was alright. But if they do it in the
case of Obama, it surely is racism.
Take this from me, the idlers will never find anything other than the fact
that Obama is an American and Americans made the correct decision to have
elected him. There is no “heck of a mess” here Bruce. If you have any on
your hands, know that it is your colleagues, the birthers who placed it
there, and that will have nothing to do with Obama.
It is the birthers and other right wingers and what they do that is
disgusting not my putting a word in quotes, okay?
I want to repeat that Obama will make a better president than the moron
Bush.
Abubakar, Abuja, Nigeria.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:02 am
This whole thing with the fake birth certificate was probably cooked up by someone in the camp of Rupert Murdoch and the news corp. Since as a natural born australian he couldn't legally own the fox television station until he became a US citizen. Now he owns the Dow and New York times and controls one of the largest media conglomerates in the world. And I dont know if you folks follow Fox News but they're not exactly Pro Obama. Dont believe what they tell you, its all hokus pokus bull $%^. Do your own research.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
Carl4432,
Instead of empty words quote me some facts!!! I am challenging your superior intellect, show us that you are capable of ACTUAL thought rather than merely regurgitating empty, meaningless, statements every liberal talk show host (and yes I listen to them and not to Rush or Sean) has repeated ad nauseum. Give me facts, son, not your mantras,
By the way before you make a bigger fool of yourself read some up on some economics, read up on some some recent history about how enlightened Europe is sloooowly moving away from the Socialist model, read up how communism failed.
Oh, before I forget… the GAO (know who they are, kid?!?) also thinks Obama’s Theory of Economics is disastrous. Look it up and then I want to see you show off your brilliance.
Now, let me give you a fatherly piece of advice… please stop foaming at the mouth, it’s really bad for you kid.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:04 am
Any child born in the US soil is an automatic American citizen, regardless of what else any other country states. But for the sake of discussion as per your statement, Obama was born in 1961 making him a British subject if he followed his father. But never mind this is the father who abandoned his teenage mom when Obama was 2 instead choosing to pursue his studies in Harvard.
The only legacy there is for Kenya is shame and abandonment, Obama is too decent to still acknowledge his paternal relatives. God Bless him
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:05 pm
Hey, did you hear that Sarah Palin lost her book deal? You betcha. She decided that everyone knew that the book was going to come to an end anyway, so she quit half way through.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:05 am
“Our Constitution requires our president to be born in the United States.”
I wouldn't go that far, Neil. It just requires that he or she be a natural-born citizen.
You can have that status if you're born abroad. *cough* John McCain *cough*
You just need your parents, or one of them at least, to be citizens. Certain details apply depending on whether it's one or both parents, etc.
I completely agree that there's nothing more to this story, from a truth-finding standpoint. But as a sociological opportunity or experiment, it is likely to continue to provide very instructive, fascinating data for months or years to come.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:07 pm
Like fixing health care? /snickers
I hope I don’t have to sit in the nosebleed section for the “Crash and Burn” spectacle.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
“Dude”
People in their early 20′s use this term, I am curious
Please tell me your age , education level, and party of choice?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
Just read your name thought so. When you get “growed up” write again
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:10 am
I have a Kenyan birth certificate dated, 1964 and it is nowwhere near that crap these guys are pendling. Kenya Birth certificates are never on white paper, they are all landscape format and the registry guys does a pretty good job in the different numbers that appear on the certificate
Obama does not decide what kind of doc the US gov issues him, thats why he posted Birth certificate he got from Hawaii. Yet this immigrant woman has the audacity to forge docs and completely disregard US gov docs. How do we know her green card or whatever it is she has gives her legal residence? she is a master forger and should be sued to bankruptcy
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born_citizen_of_the_United_States
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The grandfather provision of the “natural born Citizen” clause provides an exception to the “natural born” requirement for those persons who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, but had been born as British subjects before the American Revolution (or were born after the Revolution, but before 1787). Without this exception, ten subsequent presidents would have been constitutionally ineligible to serve.[1]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:13 pm
Why don’t you release your “original long from birth certificate”? I’ll bet you can’t. Even if you could it would just show that your parents were siblings. It might even mention that you were dropped on your head at birth.
I don’t know anybody that has their original birth registration. I’ve never even tried to get a copy of mine. Why? Because you don’t need it, idiot!
You people really need to get a grip on reality. You can’t even avoid contradicting yourself. For instance, how can someone be a “terrorist” muslim and have a “radical” BAPTIST pastor at the same time? I’m sure you’re one of the closet racists who say some c r@p like “I’m not racist, but I can’t vote for a black man”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:20 pm
Additional Amen! I’ve read his books and nowhere does he state he was born in Kenya. This fabricated “movement” is nothing more than a small group of ignorant white people who are pissed off that a black guy won. I’m white and I’m thrilled that he won. Of course, I also read and am capable of forming my own opinions, plus I don’t give a flip whether he’s black, white, purple or green – I only care that he is the best person for the job. Maybe that’s the difference between rational people and the Birthers.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:22 am
[...] believe Obama is a citizen. This leaves Republicans open to falling for hoaxes, such as a fake Kenyan birth certificate which has been spread around the internet the last couple of days. While right wing sources such as [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:22 am
Well, reasonable minds can differ on the birth requirement. I think birth on a US military base abroad qualifies, but I'm not convinced that birth abroad otherwise would. Whatever the case may be, the issue is moot and/or irrelevant because Obama was born in Honolulu.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
I love Chris kelly Take on this …
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”
So if we take the Constitution “Literally” word by word with out left-wing liberal interpretation and spin then the outcome is:”
a. Barack Obama can’t be president, even if he was born in Hawaii, because Hawaii wasn’t a state when the Constitution was adopted In 1788.
b. Therefore you can only be president if you were born in one of the original 13 colonies. Sorry Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan Bill Clinton … What are you smiling at, Abe? Kentucky didn’t join the Union until 1792
c. Read it again … It’s not just about where you were born. It says you can never be president unless you were alive in 1788. That leaves out everyone but Robert Byrd.
Here is the full article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-kelly/the-constitution-says-oba_b_249730.html?page=21
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:25 pm
Mine is the original. And I’m only a friggin cashier, not the bloody PotUS. Nowhere does it say “certification that the original exists.” In big, bold, Old English letters across the top it says “Certificate of Birth.” Even has the raised stamp from the Health Department, and the multicolored signature, that it’s required to have to prove it’s an original document, as it says right across the bottom. So, yeah. Just saying. I’d scan it to show you, but you’d probably try to get a driver’s license with it, or something.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
You really are a spammer though. That is my fact based take on this.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
Were you born in Hawaii? Otherwise your post is irrelevant.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:37 am
If Obama had no US born birth certificate, how did he get documents such as SSN, drivers license, US passport. If he were born out of the country with one parent a US citizen, his mother, he would have been issued by the embassy in the foreign country a “Certificate of a US citizen Born in a Foreign Country, as many of our GI's kids born in Germany, Japan and elsewhere. Where is that? But, then again, where is his Hawaii issued birth certificate?
Is there any proof to this Malaysian BC used to get a California college scholarship?
Curious people want to know.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:38 pm
Sorry Timothy. You didn’t read the clarification? Treasury Secretary, and the White House, confirmed that they would NOT seek additional taxes on those making less than $250K/year.
I’d strongly suggest you actually look at the economic numbers. Yes, unemployment is still going strong, but it is slowing. Consumer Confidence actually GREW in the last reporting period, and the GDP shrunk less than it has in a year last quarter, indicating that the recession is slowing down, which indicates that the economy is turning around. Slowly. It takes a LONG time to undo the damage done over 8 years of pillaging.
Regarding respect around the world, I suggest you read the comments here , on this article, from our foreign friends. MOST of them have more respect for Obama than they EVER had for Bush. He was a 2-bit (fake) cowboy (he’s not from Texas you know. He’s upper-crust East Coast Establishment all the way, that fake Texas twang and all that brush-clearing aside). Obama is at least man enough to admit when he makes a mistake (as he did in the Gates affair). Has George *ever* admitted he made a SINGLE mistake in 8 years? Nope. Still hasn’t. Can’t.
So far, I’d say that Obama has done more for the American image abroad than I thought he could, given where we started. He has begun to turn the economy around, but it will take time given what a shit-can George and Dick left it smoldering in.
Now, regarding your assertion of the COLB from Hawaii. Yes, you can get one. But it will state clearly that you were not born there. Janet Okubo (I think that’s her name, I’d have to check) has said as much publicly. And you can do that today. BUT (and this is a big but, and a tricky part for most Birthers, so pay attention) that law was passed AFTER 1961. So Obama could NOT have done that. Since when have you had to show a birth certificate to work? I don’t. I show two forms of ID, usually my Social Security card and a driver license or a passport, and there you go! I even worked for the Federal Government and had to have a security Clearance (DOE Q Clearance) done, and they didn’t ask for my Birth Certificate. All that is a long-form (since birthers are so fond of those) way of saying I think you’re pretty much full of shit there.
I have no partisan hatred. Do I think the Republican party is full of shit? Completely. Do I think they convince people who are generally to ignorant to know otherwise to rally against their own self interests? Somehow they manage it. Do I think the Democrats are full of shit? Completely. Do I think they at least have the well-being of the country at heart? Yes, I do.
Now, lastly, your assertion that Obama is somehow ‘incompetent.’ On what do you base that? His Harvard Law degree? Or are you comparing him to George Bush somehow? Someone who’s major claim to fame seems to have been a) his daddy and b) his uncanny ability to run almost every business he touched previously (and currently, it turns out) into bankruptcy? George bankrupted an OIL company. In West Texas, During an OIL BOOM for fuck’s sake. And yet he was competent and Obama isn’t? I’d say the jury is still out on Obama, while it is well in on George. Bush was an abject failure in foreign policy, domestic policy, economic policy, and even war.
So let’s at least give Obama a chance to succeed or fail. But to declare it a failure at this point? A bit premature.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:39 pm
Just being born on American soil makes one an American. If you did not know that Cricket51……….your ignorance is frightening. Learn more before you post again please.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:40 pm
His birth announcement in the HI papers was placed there by Hawaii’s Dept. of Vital Records, Chucklenuts.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:47 pm
Right. And if only Bigfoot would land his UFO and step out arm in arm with Elvis we could put an end to all the questions that keep being raised. But the fact that he hasn’t only goes to prove that it must be true.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:50 pm
You seem to favor the kind of transparency that is so transparent…it isn’t even there.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:50 am
The Australian ABC have found the man whose birth certificate was copied. Listen to the interview here.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm
His birth certificate was up on the net and they managed to find it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:50 am
But McCain wasn't born on a US military base. According to his birth certificate, he was born in Colon Hospital in Colon, Panama. Colon was always part of Panama, and was never part of the Canal Zone.
See for yourself:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/11110505/JohnMcCain-B…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
ask Palin to produce a BC for trig..and try n put that to rest
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
Crciket 51 All i have to say about your assertino about the US Constitution- BULL CRAP
Natural born citizen does nto translate into 2 US born citizens. nice try, It just goes to show how you end up shooting yourselves int eh foot. If that were indeedt he case NOONE HERE IS A US Citizen
If you were not of native american descent, then your how many generations back when they came over here from Europe and gave birth that child was not a US citizen ( using your logic). T
Enough.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
Hey Elton,
We’re not taking about just being an American citizen-we’re talking about a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, the requirement to be POTUS; that requirement is unique to the office of POTUS.
You’re the one who should be doing more research before you call others ‘ignorant.’ You’ve obviously not read the Constitution and if you have, do NOT understand it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:54 am
Bullshit. Conservative talk shows were full of excited speculation about how to amend the Constitution to allowed naturalized citizens to run for President. There was such a negative response from the public that Schwarzenegger himself had to go on TV and disavow the whole thing.
The difference? Schwarzenegger is white. Obama is black. And no one, NO ONE, questioned Obama's citizenship status until this idiotic birther nonsense started last summer.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:56 am
Wrong. Islam has no such provision. You are confusing Islam with Judaism, where the child of a Jewish *woman* is automatically Jewish unless and until s/he converts to another faith.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:04 pm
I work in the Mental Health field, and all I can say is you conspiracy theorists better get treated for Paranoia, and quit listening to the fat, pill popping (War on Drugs, Family values advocate, who has been divprced 3 times) Rush, who is the biggest hypocrite in the United States, and the most unpatriotic slob there is, wanting the President’s policies to fail and the every day , hard working, Americans to suffer, due to political reasons. I think his major audience consists of people who’s family tree doesn’t branch!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:05 pm
What is it with you and double posting, sir? Your points really aren’t good enough to merit saying twice, fyi.
As for staying on-topic, have you ever had a conversation? There are these things called tangents. In Geometry, a tangent is a line that has one, and only one point in common with a circle. When alluding to a tangent in conversation, you’re in the circle talking about your thing, and then the tangent comes. Instead of staying in the circle talking about the same thing, you follow the tangent instead, and talk about something new. That’s where ideas come from. Talking outside the circle is a lot like thinking outside the box.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:07 pm
Again, not up to Obama to disprove your crazy ideas. It’s up to YOU to prove them. So far, your side’s got nothing. Well, except forgeries.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:08 pm
Yes, I am a called Minister by The Spirit of GOD. Evidently, you don’t know what an authentic birth certificate looks like. That type of birth certificate that is shown on behalf of Obama is downsized version and I believe that that type of birth certificate is what corrupt corporatist and gain willed politicians are allowing to be accepted as a birth certificate to hide the true origin of where a lot a of these undocumented illegal people that are brought here to destroy the economy of our Nation by paying them slave wages. I don’t know wether or not if you have seen an authentic long version of a birth certificate, if not ask one of your elders to show you what an authentic birth certificate looks like. Thank You. Because I am a Minister of Jesus Christ/The Word of GOD which is The Truth; it The Truth which I seek. God Bless You.
Ira L. Lewis
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:09 am
Birth certificates don't contain information about religion. Get your own BC out and look at it, if you have one. It won't say what religion you are (and what newborn has a religion anyway?) or your parents either. Try it, then be embarrassed about what you said.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:11 pm
“Your points really aren’t good enough to merit saying twice, fyi.”
Yes, they are. Yes, they are.
In my own defense, I find I have to say everything twice because people like you can’t listen once without their own pomposity getting in the way.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
I don’t care if you do work in the health industry, you had better do an investigation as what an authentic birth certificate looks like. Evidently, you are a newer birth generation than myself; but I have the original copy of my birth certificate of 58 years of age and copies os that original copy. You need to do background research as to what these type of birth certificates look like. Again, GOD Bless you.
Ira L. Lewis
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:14 pm
I don’t know why you weren’t worried about debt 2 years ago, because the vast majority of it grew during the Bush years.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:20 pm
Umberto,
I must tip my hat to your own obvious display of genius. Here’s the deaI (I realize it might make you uncomfortable, sorry!) I have said nothing about the birth certificate Dr. Orly Taitz showed on TV, because, whether she realized or not, it’s obvious to me that what she showed was a forgery. Which still does NOT resolve the question asked by the birthers. Only Obama can quell that argument, just like McCain immediately did when your people brought it up against him.
My comment only referred to an individual who tried to change the debate to bring up extraneous issues about Bush WHICH HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE. I merely tried to get him to provide facts on what he did say, instead of just foaming at the mouth!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
Come on Toby Moby, just because you’re a democrat doesn’t mean you’re liberal or progressive and nobody buys into your charade. I’d take a northeast rockafeller republican over a southern dixiecrat any day and twice on sunday.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
Listen jerk,
If you knew how to read with comprehension you would already have the answers to your questions. As far as education is concerned I hold a master of science degree. Which high school did you graduate from? Facts…. You GOP assholes are all alike you get the facts and because you don’t like them you invent a reason in your own minds to ignore them. As far as economics goes it is not my field but I have had training in it now why don’t you lie and tell me you hold a PhD in it. GOP assholes are all alike they attack the person and ignore the message. GET A GRIP YOU ASSHOLES LOST AND our side is in power most likely for a long time that is W’s legacy I have repeatedly told my GOP friends that W was the best thing to ever happen for the Democratic party.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:36 pm
Bye the way I am 57 years in age now who’s the kid kid
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
There is a process for removing the president if conspiracy is proven; so, I would think it wise for Mr. Obama to just prove his birth with the long form certificate and be done with it! If, he chooses not to prove beyond doubt his citizenship, he’s done! The mob of irratated people will only grow, and the heat that is intensifying on congressional and senate leaders will flow over onto Mr. Obama – Whether he likes it or not!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
Umberto,
“In my own defense, I find I have to say everything twice because people like you can’t listen once without their own pomposity getting in the way.In my own defense, I find I have to say everything twice because people like you can’t listen once without their own pomposity getting in the way.”
Bravo!!! Bravissimo!!! Now take heed of your own words above and stop displaying your lack of intelligent debating skill… or any kind of intelligence, for that matter.
madcapfeline,
Be fair, please! Don’t confuse Umberto with things like geometry, he’s proven it’s above his pay grade.
Instead of sticking to the facts, instead of offering intelligen rebuttal based on known facts, he has to accuse anyone of his own blind pomposity. Pity him!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:39 am
It is clear that the Framers viewed both those born within the territory of the United States (jus soli( as well as those both of a US Citizen abroad (jus sanguinus) were “natural born”.
The Naturalization Act of 1790, states that “the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens”.
People confuse the concept of “native born” with “natural born”…the founders viewed them as somewhat distinct concepts. They recognized that Roman Law, which also dealt with these issues as more children of citizens were born beyond the actual borders of Rome. Thus they incorporated jus sanguinus (law of descent) into their concept of “natural born”. There were others that could apply for citizenship…through Imperial or Senate edict. Those that served in the Roman military of performed some act beneficial to the Empire were “naturalized”.
Obama was born in Hawaii, a US State…that allows him to be President by “jus soli”. But he is also a “natural born” Citizen via “jus sanguinus” nd that right was recognized by the Framers when they wrote the first Citizenship laws just three years after the Constitution was ratified.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:41 am
Everyone know's that he was born in Kenya,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,in a manger.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:41 am
Hmmm… Which network did Dan Rather work for before he was fired? It is not Fox News that has a proven track record of forging documents.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:44 am
Why does the media and others try so hard to discredit our President of the United States, I have never seen any other president put under the microscope like Obamma has had to endure. Just get with it. He is an American, He is a great President, He is cleaning up the mess left by the Bush and Clinton Family. Let him get us out of this recession and the country back on its feet already. Enough Already!! He's President and He is here, and so what, he just happens to be Black. Get over it, its 2009 already. When will u really just let the best man for the job, be the best man for the job.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:46 pm
As if either of you knuckleheads had mad skills at debating. You don’t know nuthin’, don’t wanna know nuthin’ and ain’t trainable. You’ll make good Republicans.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:47 am
I think I just threw up in my mouth! LOL that's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time! Thank you for a good laugh!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:48 am
The link used in Mr. Weigel's post for “'certified copy of registration of birth' from Australia” on bomford.net (http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/Da…) is invalid (“Page Not Found” HTTP 404 error).
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:51 am
Well look at all of the illegals obtaining their fake SSN#'s, dirvers license's and so on. Where there's a will there's a way. I'm not saying Obama stole his but if you're desperate enough to do it you'll fine a way to get it done.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:53 am
Wow. Can I live in your perfect place? Everyone in the world wants to live here in America. Why? I thought we were the stupid ones. Are Americans the only people dissatisfied with their government? I'll tell you what stinks……biting the hand that feeds you.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:59 am
On the Australian form, there is a section “Signature and Description of Authorized Person, and Name, Description and Residence of Informant”. This is not on the kenyan document.
The Australian document is “No. 2″. On April 10, 1959 David Jeffery was only the second person born that year? I know that Australia currently has a very low birth rate, but I doubt that it ever was THAT low.
Note that “G. F. Lavendar” is not aligned with the rest of the type on the Australian form. Everything else is neatly left aligned, like that was the margin set on the typewriter. Why would that line not match?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:03 pm
Crazy people don’t know they’re crazy. Take comfort in that YesIDo. You can make every argument you want and it can sound perfectly logical to you, but that doesn’t mean that it is logical to the rest of us. By the way, the short form birth cirtificate is an acceptable form of proof for eligibility to hold public office — even the president. The long form birth certificate is only an issue because the last peice of proof you asked for, you got.
You’re incredibly naive if you think it’s going to end by him revealing his long form birth certificate. The wheels will keep on turning, and more arguments will pop up. This is not about his birthing, its about delegitamizing BHO. It will never end.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:06 pm
Carl,
“Jerk?!?” Is that your best argument?!? Brilliant! I bow to your superior reasoning.
I am 63, kid!!!
“GOP assholes are all alike they attack the person and ignore the message.” Wooow!!! I didn’t call you any names but you just proved who and what you are for the whole wide world to enjoy. Well done, sonny! Congratulations!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:07 pm
don’t know if this is true – But BRAVO.
It’s not true (not that that’s ever stopped a birther). One member of the National Guard volunteered, and then decided he didn’t want to be deployed (ok, he decided beforehand as his whole point in volunteering was to be part of an ill-advised court case). So they revoked his orders, and because this coward wanted to play games another soldier had to have his tour extended. That’s it. If any soldier is given deployment orders and refuses (other than Guard volunteers recruited by half-wit lawyers), he/she will face a court-martial.
If he is not a citizen – he is a criminal. And then we are in grave danger of a criminal alien running the military.
He is a citizen. So no danger of criminal aliens using their mind-control devices on us.
Produce the D@mned document.
Already did. In 2008.
If I were in his position I would go on National TV
We are all very glad you are not in his position.
show the document and let his opponents have an independed expert validate it and compare the hand or foot print to his own.
The worst thing the President of the United States could do would be to submit to the demands of deranged birthers who will never be satisfied.
This Would End the Controversy 100%.
Correction: 0%. Crazy ass birther will never stop.
If raises the legitimate Question – “What is he hiding?”
It only raises one question. Who let you people out of the asylum?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:09 pm
Why can no one get comparative copies of uncontested birth certificates from both/either Kenya and Hawaii from that period. Wouldn't that put a lot of this to rest?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:09 pm
The link is not working because “This account has been suspended.
Either the domain has been overused, or the reseller ran out of resources.” Austrailian ISP' are stingy with bandwidth.
By the way, I don't understand all the controversy, like most of the “Birthers” Obama's been “Born Again”, ain't that good enough for you whackos. Oh I forgot, he's the wrong color.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:12 pm
I dont care to see any birth papers as it doesnt matter.. he is ineligible because his father was a British subject at the time of Obama’s Birth making him of dual allegience meaning he is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN! End of story.. over.. what is going to happen is he IS going to produce a BC that says he was born in Hawaii, and this will all get swept away and the real issue of NATURAL BORN will be no more…The BC issue is being pushed to hide the real problem. I totally believe he was born here.. but he will not ever be a NBC. To be natural born, both parents must be US citizens at the time of the childs birth. There is US Cit, Naturalized Cit and Natural Born…dont get them confused…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:13 pm
First of all, it’s not in his possession. It’s in the Hawaii state archives.
Secondly, why should he bother? He’s already released the birth certificate issued by the State of Hawaii. It’s good enough for any court in the land. Why submit to the demands of lunatics?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:14 pm
It certainly does state “WHERE” the birth took place:
City, Town, or Location of Birth
Honolulu
Island of Birth
Oahu
County of Birth
Honolulu
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:14 pm
If he’s been so good up to this point at lying and protecting his so-called secret, you don’t think he’d be able to doctor his long form birth certificate too? Try to suspend your disblief, if he’s managed to fool everyone but a small percentage of birthers, what makes you think that he can’t continue the charade and continue to fool people. This is the fallacy of the birther argument. If he was really that adept at deceiving the world, then he’d have no problem producing more deceptions to “prove” his critics wrong.
Here’s the circular logic: Imagine this scenario –
Birthers “Produce the long form birth certificate!”
BHO “Here it is.”
Birthers “it’s fake, you knew that somone would ask for that, so you had one forged. You took so long to produce it, we don’t beleive it’s real!”
Ok — where do we go from here guys?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:14 pm
We need to see and validate the original
No, you don’t.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:15 pm
YesIdo:
first: Hawaii’s govenor is a she ( Linda Lingle) not a him.
and Linda Lingle (Rep.) confirmed that the BC of Obama is real and so did the Health Dep, Director Chiyome Fukino:
I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen,”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:16 pm
Thing is when verification attempts are made those illegals are found out. You are saying the FBI and other departments that would have done background checks including contacting the various states and what not to have them look in their archives wouldn't detect irregularties that would show up if he had faked anything?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:17 pm
Dead wrong Fox has a proven track record of lying and they even got told in a court of law that they can legally lie.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:19 pm
Umberto,
Whether you write under this name or any of the others, try doing so without foaming at the mouth, try using some intelligence instead of ad hoc attacks. Just because you scream louder, proves nothing. Except… it shows what you are. Why do you need to publicize it? What desperate demand in your childhood was left unfullfilled?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:21 pm
When resolving http://www.bomford.net/ the following is displayed:
This account has been suspended.
Either the domain has been overused, or the reseller ran out of resources.
Apparently the traffic has exceeded the amount allowed by the level of service purchased by the domain owner.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:24 pm
Not all are found out. I also said that I didn't say Obama did that either.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:25 pm
Uh, yes he has, it’s called a COLB and the photographs at FactCheck
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:31 pm
Use the copy on the politijab site
http://politijab.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=25&…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:36 pm
Oh please, your accusations are garbage. He lied to the US? Where is your proof? At the time of the Iraq war everyone believed Hussein had some sort of weapon, be it nuclear, chemical or biological. He was playing games with the UN in order to appear ‘strong’ to the Mullahs–making it seem that he did have something to hide. It turns out that there wasn’t anything, however nobody lied, save Hussein, and that was only to protect his own power. As for torture….please, I have delved through the pages of history and can tell you that this is nothing compared to actual torture.
You wish to look for a traitor and murderer, look no further than FDR. He went to bed with Stalin, giving him everything he wanted in order to ‘build a partnership to make the world safe for democracy,’ despite the fact that Stalin had killed over 20 million people by this time. He backed Stalin’s population transfer and repatriation programs which lead to the deportation of 30 million people and the deaths of 6 million of them, broken down as 2,000,000 Germans, 1,000,000 Poles, 1,000,000 Ukrainians and Belorussians combined, 1,000,000 ‘repatriated citizens’ (mainly Russians) and 1,000,000 Others (Romanians, Hungarians, Japanese, Bulgarians, Italians, Finns, Estonians, Latvians and Lithuanians combined). He has more blood on his hands than all other US political leaders combined.
Not to mention he broke several treaties between the US and USSR, ignored the rules of war as agreed upon as of 1908, violated the UN declaration which he himself authored and sold the 100 million survivors of Eastern Europe into Communism, some literally such as the Eastern Poles and the people of the Baltic States which were annexed by the USSR. You have the greatest war criminal of American History here, the beloved leftist leader FDR.
You with no knowledge of history try to depict Bush as a war criminal, yet have no idea what your talking about. The great generals of the past would have been far harsher on these hapless savages in Afghanistan, generals such as Patton and MacAurther, who actually fought the last major US war. Iraq and Afghanistan are naught but skirmishes given more people die from drunk driving per year in the US than all military casualties combined over 8 years. Oh self righteous fools who know nothing of true suffering, what do you say to the millions who died during WWII, the Poles for example, families of 8 where only one child survived, where entire generations were liquidated. That is war, it’s ugly, it’s inhuman, it’s something we have not faced in 64 years.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:39 pm
He is the best man for the job of destroying this country with his irresponsible spending. He keeps complaining he “inherited a $1.2 trillion dollar deficit” which he has now added, in less that a year mind you, an additional $2 trillion. This $2 trillion does not even take into consideration what the Federal Reserve has spend bailing out banks etc–no one know how many trillions they have spent. All he knows how to do is spend other peoples money and apologize to the world about how wrong the US is about everything. The man obviously despises the country and wants to transform it into his socialist eden.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:41 pm
A Web site, Amendforarnold.com, promotes the effort with photos of the Austrian-born Schwarzenegger and a mention of the Canadian-born Granholm — “Amend for Arnold and Jen,” it proclaims. The same people who are sponsoring the Web site have bought ads on California television, hoping to create a groundswell of support.
Several measures have been introduced in Congress, including a joint resolution by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, which proposes a constitutional amendment that would extend eligibility for the presidency to immigrants who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,139952,00.html
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:42 pm
I would just point out that Orly is NOT passing this off as anything. Her post clearly states she is seeking authentication of it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:44 pm
I am all for proofs, but what would make you believe? If I produced a piece paper, you would say I forged it, and that all levels of the government are in for the cover-up. Think about it. What would make you stop asking for proof? How would you arrange millions of people from looking at the certificate or using it for evil puposes?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:45 pm
Thanks for the humor! I need it after reading all of this crazy right wing nonsense. God knows there are better, more productive uses for these people’s time than on such a ridiculous and hate driven effort.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:51 pm
Numnut, every economist has said we need to spend to get out of this recession the repubs created the last 8 years. HE HAS TO SPEND. Get it through your thick head. Doing nothing will cause even more unemployment and a slower recovery. Perhaps you should take an Econ 101 course before posting your pathetic rants, efftard.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:52 pm
Are you people STUPID or what? Bush has killed how many thousands? Trashed our economy. Attacked and destroyed a country that has NOT warrented such an attack (Iraq). Rode his bike with Lance while we died and idiots are debating where O was born What a joke you GOP people are. At least he was elected, too bad your guy wasn't.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks, Mike, I made the same observation in another post a little later before noticing your reply.
Not to discredit your statement on Australian ISP's, but the ISP used by bomford.net actually does not appear be Australian, at least the IP address (207.250.49.161) for the domain seems to be registered to a company in Germantown, Wisconsin and is a North American IP address.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks, Mike, I made the same observation in another post a little later before noticing your reply.
Not to discredit your statement on Australian ISP's, but the ISP used by bomford.net actually does not appear be Australian, at least the IP address (207.250.49.161) for the domain seems to be registered to a company in Germantown, Wisconsin and is a North American IP address.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks, Mike, I made the same observation in another post a little later before noticing your reply.
Not to discredit your statement on Australian ISP's, but the ISP used by bomford.net actually does not appear be Australian, at least the IP address (207.250.49.161) for the domain seems to be registered to a company in Germantown, Wisconsin and is a North American IP address.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks, Mike, I made the same observation in another post a little later before noticing your reply.
Not to discredit your statement on Australian ISP's, but the ISP used by bomford.net actually does not appear be Australian, at least the IP address (207.250.49.161) for the domain seems to be registered to a company in Germantown, Wisconsin and is a North American IP address.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks, Mike, I made the same observation in another post a little later before noticing your reply.
Not to discredit your statement on Australian ISP's, but the ISP used by bomford.net actually does not appear be Australian, at least the IP address (207.250.49.161) for the domain seems to be registered to a company in Germantown, Wisconsin and is a North American IP address.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks, Mike, I made the same observation in another post a little later before noticing your reply.
Not to discredit your statement on Australian ISP's, but the ISP used by bomford.net actually does not appear be Australian, at least the IP address (207.250.49.161) for the domain seems to be registered to a company in Germantown, Wisconsin and is a North American IP address.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks, Mike, I made the same observation in another post a little later before noticing your reply.
Not to discredit your statement on Australian ISP's, but the ISP used by bomford.net actually does not appear be Australian, at least the IP address (207.250.49.161) for the domain seems to be registered to a company in Germantown, Wisconsin and is a North American IP address.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:54 pm
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp
This explains it all, and has the scan of the birth certificate. The problem isn’t with the explanation, dude — the problem is that people don’t want to listen to it and prattle on about “long form” versus “short form” without understanding what they’re talking about. When I requested a copy of my birth certificate for a job that required it a couple years ago, I got a “short form,” because that’s what you get from most states these days. That’s ALL you get. Instead of “long form” and “short form” we should be talking about “old form” and “new form.” Bureaucracies change forms over the years. It’s still a legal document. It’s accepted as a birth certificate by everyone except, apparently, Lou Dobbs and Orly Taitz… and other people who are, bluntly, looking for a reason to keep this dispute alive.
This is an absolutely crazy conspiracy theory. We HAVE the document. We’ve verified the publication of birth announcements from two papers in Hawaii in 1961! Are people making the case that somebody has forged freakin’ microfilm archives in the Honolulu Advertiser? Really? This doesn’t seem just a little farfetched?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:54 pm
The Naturalization Act of 1790 has been overridden and has nothing to do with immigration law in August 1961. Natural born means that under the law at the time when the person was born, no request for naturalization needed to be made to make him a citizen.
If Obama was born in Hawaii, he would be natural born. I don't believe the birther nonsense, but their point is that there were at least three illegal methods of obtaining a legal birth certificate in Hawaii that would just rely on one adult telling a lie. And that the original birth certificate would show the type of documentation used to generate the original birth certificate as well as when the original birth certificate was issued that would clear up the issue.
Even many birthers probably don't believe that he was born overseas, But they do believe there may be embarrasing information on the original form as the reason he will not release the orginal.
McCain went through a similar indignity, and the federal courts held that the law at the time when he was born said that his birth in a US Territory to US citizens in the year he was born made him a natural born citizen.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 12:59 pm
Why does the media and others try so hard to discredit our President of the United States, Since when is the media trying to discredit Obama…they walk in front of him throwing down rose petals…
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:00 pm
[...] [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:01 pm
As Ms Palin said in her final speech, “Stop making things up!” … and, if that's not good enough for you then, as a member of the party that calls itself “the Christian right,” remember “Thou shall not bear false witness.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:04 pm
Why won’t you admit that he has released his birth certificate? What on earth is the difference between a certified copy released by the state verifying the information on the original and the original itself? This is not about Obama, it is about you.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:04 pm
way2confused:
Two points; one, the strongest criticism of Obama has been that he hasn't urged Congress to spend ENOUGH to stimulate the economy. Of course, that criticism is led by Paul Krugman, last year's winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics, but what does HE know? I mean, that Nobel thing is just a popularity contest.
Secondly, Obama can't spend ANYBODY'S money. All appropriations emanate from the House. He can only recommend.
Oh, BTW, would you conservatives quit beating that drum about Obama apologizing to the world? You sound like a bunch of whiny little tittie babies. We have completely effed up the Middle East. I think a little apologizing is in order. Don't you ever apologize to your friends and family, or are you perfect?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:04 pm
way2confused:
Two points; one, the strongest criticism of Obama has been that he hasn't urged Congress to spend ENOUGH to stimulate the economy. Of course, that criticism is led by Paul Krugman, last year's winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics, but what does HE know? I mean, that Nobel thing is just a popularity contest.
Secondly, Obama can't spend ANYBODY'S money. All appropriations emanate from the House. He can only recommend.
Oh, BTW, would you conservatives quit beating that drum about Obama apologizing to the world? You sound like a bunch of whiny little tittie babies. We have completely effed up the Middle East. I think a little apologizing is in order. Don't you ever apologize to your friends and family, or are you perfect?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:04 pm
I see BDS (Bush derangement Syndrome) is still alive and well.
Now that Obama has spent your grandkids retirement to combat the myth of global warming, he is well on his way to spend their grandkids retirement to fix a health care system that is only broken by the fact that we are giving free health care to illigal immigrants. The tru number or people w/o insurance is not 42 million that you hear over and over again it is actually closer to 10 million. I am the first to agree that even that number is to high but to spend 2 trillion dollars to give free health care to that group is insane.
STOP the bankrupting of America.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:04 pm
I see BDS (Bush derangement Syndrome) is still alive and well.
Now that Obama has spent your grandkids retirement to combat the myth of global warming, he is well on his way to spend their grandkids retirement to fix a health care system that is only broken by the fact that we are giving free health care to illigal immigrants. The tru number or people w/o insurance is not 42 million that you hear over and over again it is actually closer to 10 million. I am the first to agree that even that number is to high but to spend 2 trillion dollars to give free health care to that group is insane.
STOP the bankrupting of America.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:09 pm
and yet you had such a firm and unwaivering opinion without fact?
amazing the difference between opined emotion and fact isn’t it
under the law, yes, both McCain’s parents are American citizens. under the law so is Obama’s mother and in tern him.
the gray area is what the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” is vesus simply a “Statutory Citizen” which is a person who is a US Citizen by right (as opposed to by naturalization) but not necessarily Natural Born.
See, the constitution says No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at
the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office
of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not
have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a
Resident within the United States.
but, it never lays out a strict definition of “natural born” If you look at the 14th amendment and Title 8 of the US Code (both nicely included by will9 – thank you) you will see no mention of Natural Born in the definition.
If you look further at case law on the Federal level there is little to no attempt to define it there either.
Some states have basic statutes attempting to define it but there are conflicting viewpoints from state to state in how or what defines Natural Born.
Therefor, the specific use of Natural Born as a way to pre-empt a US Citizen (which Obama clearly is by the existing legal definition) is greatly dependent on the the reader’s definition. You choose to read it as meaning one thing but the only real meaning can be one that is defined legally. And, since none-such element exists the next best option is to use the tools priorly granted defining Statutory citizenship as noted above and go with those, which is what the US has been doing as a general rule of thumb since their adoption in clearing potential canidates for any office. When those come into question (such as Gov. Schwarzenegger in CA) different governmental entities have handled them in different ways.
As a matter of fact, just for the record on Mr. McCain actually, he was not born in the Canal Zone, he was born at Colon Hospital in Colon, Panama, which lies outside of the US territorial holdings and recognized as Panama proper. In April 2008 the U.S. Senate approved a non-binding resolution recognizing McCain’s status as a natural born citizen, so he basically got a government waiver to define his ambiguous status based on his unique case.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:09 pm
You sir are an idiot. Perfect example of the demcrapic party.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:09 pm
You sir are an idiot. Perfect example of the demcrapic party.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:11 pm
This is what the repubs have been reduced to……crazy whack-job conspiracy theorists with no concept of logic, reason or rationality. How sad.
Hmm, why didn't they ask for Bush's birth certificate….or even a basic sanity test? Maybe it could have saved us a war, hundreds of thousands dead, and a recession. But this is the party of Palin………
All the repub clowns do these days is blabber on about socialism and other BS. It's like they can't stand the idea of a “colored” guy in power. I would wager that these people could not even define socialism if asked. Oh no, the guy wants to tax rich people more – well who else should pay for the mess created by the rich & their puppet Bush? The rich are paying hisorically low levels of tax – it was much higher under IKE (now where is the talk of him being a socialist?)
The pathetic knuckle-draggers really should get an education. But when you listen to folks like Limbaugh, Beck and Hannity (not one college degree between the three of them), then no wonder you end up with tea-baggers, birthers, and creationists all over the place.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:11 pm
Abortion kills more people in one year than the whole Iraqi war did in Bush's 8 yrs total…and you post that crap….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:12 pm
1) True. But if the document were being used as a template, with some modications, one would take out the blank sections, particularly if they were blank, and unenumerated. Given the fact that many Kenyan births would be outside of hospitals one might expect that this section or something analogous, “should” be on a Kenyan document. The Taitz one doesn't. Maybe whoever created it wanted it to fit on a 8.5x 11 form? Why would someone INCLUDE a section in a fake that doesn't exist in the original, and leave it blank? More reasonable the other way 'round.
2) I doubt that David Jeffrey Bomford was only the second child born in Australia that year either. In fact I doubt that the Australians would be out counting who was the 234th Australian born in 1959 and providing these numbers in real time to put on Birth Certificates. Thus the number is either a “local” number (dealing with births in that District) or perhaps the number of the District of Hintmarsh. Or maybe DJ Bomford was #2 listing on pp.5733?
2) I doubt that David Jeffrey Bomford was only the second child born in Australia that year either. In fact I doubt that the Australians would be out counting who was the 234th Australian born in 1959 and providing these numbers in real time to put on Birth Certificates. Thus the number is either a “local” number (dealing with births in that District) or perhaps the number of the District of Hintmarsh
3) So. If you look carefully you'll see that the letters do line up precisely with the ones above. Misalignments like this are common when the writer is simply aligning the left margin visually. If there are several “empty rows” the visual cue is absent and it's hard to line up the margin precisely. In fact, that's precisely what might happen with the gap produced by the situation you noted in (2). Thats actually good evidence it was done on an older model typewriter, one with perhaps the margin tab disfunctional, rather than a word processor.
lso note, though perhaps it's my imagination, that there is an erased “dot” in the blank section above, that might have been an effort to place a margin cue in that section. But it also looks mis-aligned.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:12 pm
I'm not doubting your word, Bruce, but when did “Federal Courts” adjudicate McCain's eligibility? I've done extensive research, and I've never heard of any court deciding the issue. Can you cite?
I do remember the US Senate passing a Resolution (non-binding, unfortunately) clarifying the issue. It was introduced by Dems McCaskill & Leahy and Republican Coburn. It passed unanimously, with every single Democrat voting for it. Shows a lot more class than Republican Congressmen introducing legislation to require BC's of all “future” candidates and muttering mealy-mouthed platitudes when asked if they believe Obama is eligible to be president.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
what people, zygotes? you a religious nutjob who voted to put a know-nothing bimbo one hearbeat away from the presidency. You are an effing joke.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:17 pm
oh, yeah, be real proud of the bush years – the worst in history. good one, numnut.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:18 pm
National debt is now 11 trillion. 8 trillion of that accumumlated under Reagan, Bush 1, and Bush 2. Five trillion accumulated under Bush 2 all by himself, mostly to fund wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, that serve no purpose at all. In reality, illegal immigrants contribute more in withholding taxes than they ever receive in free health care or any other program. They will never be able to access all the Social Security and Medicare taxes paid in. The actual uninsured/underinsured is 45-50 million people, all citizens. We are not bankrupted by “tax and spend” liberals, but by “BORROW and spend” Republi-nazis.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:19 pm
By the way tool, was abortion stopped under the bush administration????? Your logic is as flawed as your pathetic party. Stupid eff-tard.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:20 pm
The question I have is why won’t he relase his SAT scores, transcripts, Thesis, etc. Could it be that he is not that bright. I mean even the idiot Bush had to release his grades etc but Wonder Dog does not have to.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:25 pm
John McCain wasnt born in the US, how come they dont over scrutinize his birth certificate???
Barack Obama, could be born anywhere on the planet, point being his MOMMA was a Us Citizen, there he'd come out the womb as one. End of story.
“Generally, if you are born in the United States or born to U.S. citizens, you are born a U.S. citizen, unless you are born to a foreign diplomat.”
http://www.american-citizenship.org/
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
and what hole is your head buried in? this man is a huge danger to american freedom.he is rapidly grabining control,and changing freedom as we know it.when a person wans to make it so that the government takes over major corperations such as banks,auto indust,housinging,and medical,this is a total step to control you,your choices,your life style.obama has put his self in front of the public on a consistant basis. with his speechs of what wonderful care and plans he will give the american people.this is how castro,stalin,idi amien,hitler,the list of dictators goes on. but all sweet talked the people of a wonderous improvment with change,read your history.humanity was lead like lambs to the slaughter,till it was to late.the iron gate of socialisam and commie control slamed shut.this so called president is the catilist of americas fall from freedom.listen to his empty speechs,his words are full of me's an i's.when he gets finished….we will have know country the free USA standing to put back on it's feet.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:27 pm
I really am sad to see this 'birther movement' gain traction, instead of puttering out like I thought this would it seems to have hooked its tentacles into every main stream and some independent news medias as well. I understand that we have to debunk this theory but it seems that quite the opposite is happening. Lou Dobbs is a jerk in a major way, but he took his ummm.. jerkiness to a much higher level ( jerkiness is a word but birther is not ). I think its just away for racist to spin there hate without being called to mat and being made to look like KKK members. This is 2009 why such hate, I had hoped the next generation would kill this nonsense, but unfortunately people like these 'birthers' will cling to anything that will keep there ‘America’ like they remembered it 60 years ago, segregated.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:31 pm
I hate splitting hairs, but to be honest that’s not a fair comparison. Bush’s honor and Obama meeting the requirements to be Presidet? Come on, that’s not even an intelligent comparison. The difference between Repubs and Libs is what we choose to bitch about, either Bush’s war record and Palins clothing or the Presidents birth record. It becomes clear in comparison. Listen to Fortunate Son and maybe you’ll understand why his war records might be missing. Right, no but not the same as Obama’s BC by a LONG shot. (And wasn’t there a Lib who was caught lying about his war record?) Food for thought.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:31 pm
You’re Strange. He had seen his grandmother regularly. Michelle, the girls, would vacation there during Christmas time. Fact: Obama has a white grand uncle who is still alive, and Obama spoke of him numerous times during his campaign as helping to free Jewish concentration camps in Europe. This same uncle attended his inaugration. So, you see, there is another “living” person around. Check your facts.
I’m sure he was vetted by everyone and everybody and if they could have found him NOT to be a citizen he would have NEVER, I repeat NEVER, obtained the Office of President.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:31 pm
It took Bush 2, 8 years to accumulate his debt, the Obamessiah in a mere 6 MONTHS already passed the Bush half point! Learn some basic 'rithmetic before u open your moth and show everybody what is missing between your 2 ears.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:31 pm
LOL! tea-baggers! Do they even know what that means? I have a sneaking suspicion they do!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:32 pm
It is because they have NOTHING else. The Right is done. The intelligent people of this country stopped listening to Bill O and Rush and started using their heads for more than holding their hats up. Unfortunately, there are some Small Brains still out there who, with nothing better to do, get onto the internet and look for trouble to start. These are the wasted few who are lost to reality. Toe suckers. The Great Unwashed.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:33 pm
We don't call ourselves the christian right – you do
You are the party of taking categorizing and labeling people.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:35 pm
Oh, and they are unable to spell correctly because they huffed too much paint while in their teens, and their brains don't work well anymore.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:35 pm
Even by your own math, Obama surpassed the Bush 2's half way point (and that took 8 years to accumulate!) in a mere MONTHS! Quick, learn some basic 'rithmethic before you open your mouth.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:36 pm
It’s people such as yourself who probably don’t know who their “real” father is, try to project this onto someone else. He knows his heritage, too bad you don’t.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:36 pm
Actually, they did: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar… , but I suppose its only ok to question the Republican candidate, BO deserves affirmative action on natural born citizen, after all, he is our affirmative action president.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:39 pm
The Australian BC is a fake. Put it in Photoshop and you will see. Also, notice the number 1's in his date of birth are completely different. MR. Bomford is a FAKE!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:40 pm
Shrub 2 inherited a surplus, which he turned into a deficit then into the next Great Depression. Worst president we ever had. Just like after Ray-gun/Shrub 1, the Democrats are left the pay off the deficit.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:40 pm
Shrub 2 inherited a surplus, which he turned into a deficit then into the next Great Depression. Worst president we ever had. Just like after Ray-gun/Shrub 1, the Democrats are left the pay off the deficit.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:41 pm
Quick, learn some basic economics before you open yours.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Show me a real birth certificate for Obama. People can make up all kinds of fake ones until then. The next one could be from planet Krypton (LOL).
Mcain is not the president, if he was, there would be a raft of Moveon.org nut birthers out there for him. The difference is that he would actually have a birth certificate.
I do not care where he was born if he loves America. Something that I doubt.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Can't win, so you bring up racism as usual. Is Alan Keyes a racist for questioning Obama's birthplace?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Can't win, so you bring up racism as usual. Is Alan Keyes a racist for questioning Obama's birthplace?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Can't win, so you bring up racism as usual. Is Alan Keyes a racist for questioning Obama's birthplace?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Can't win, so you bring up racism as usual. Is Alan Keyes a racist for questioning Obama's birthplace?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Your anger knows no bounds and is kind of fun to read.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Your anger knows no bounds and is kind of fun to read.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Your anger knows no bounds and is kind of fun to read.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Your anger knows no bounds and is kind of fun to read.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Your anger knows no bounds and is kind of fun to read.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:43 pm
its amazing to me that all this wasnt looked into and discovered long before this man was allowed to even run for president.Now that he is in office and ruining america as we know it and allowing his family to roam the world on american taxpayers money,its to late.
America is being destroyed by this so called Barrack Obama.I hope all you that voted for him have visas to africa because thats what america is being turned into and thats who Barrack Obama is selling our country to.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:43 pm
its amazing to me that all this wasnt looked into and discovered long before this man was allowed to even run for president.Now that he is in office and ruining america as we know it and allowing his family to roam the world on american taxpayers money,its to late.
America is being destroyed by this so called Barrack Obama.I hope all you that voted for him have visas to africa because thats what america is being turned into and thats who Barrack Obama is selling our country to.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:44 pm
Many constitutional scholars look to acts of Congress from the time period in which the Constitution was ratified as evidence of the framers' intent, since many of the framers were voting members of Congress as well. So, the point is a valid one.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:46 pm
The war in Iraq wasn’t WON. Obama decided he would honor his campaign promise and ‘pull out of Iraq.’ He cleaned that one up for Bush and now he has to work on Afgahnistan — the 2 wars Bush initiated.
Oh, haven’t you heard? The economy is on the upswing, housing is rebounding, and banks are repaying that loan. All of this in just 6 months as opposed to Bush’s 96 months in office.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:46 pm
Planning on collecting your social security when you’re retired? Freakin’ liberal SOCIALIST.
Give me a break with your idiotic socialism baiting. Perhaps you should look up some of the programs you and your loved ones take advantage of that, by definition are socialism.
;
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:46 pm
Do you even read the paper? Who created the mess we are in now, no one had anything to say about Retarded and Chief Bush nose-diving our economy into the ground his last few weeks in office? Do you think the cash for clunkers was Obama’s idea? I don’t think so, I think Senator Chuck Schumer came up with that brilliant idea and the fools in Congress passed it. Even if the number is only 10 million without health insurance ( and I highly doubt that) why should the child down the street not have access? That is heartless, yes I have said it. Who picks you fruits and vegetables, who fix's your streets, umm let me think oh yeah illegal immigrants. Hey I don’t like it either, especially because illegal’s from Haiti always end up back in Haiti, Mexicans stay, get caught then they let them out and make them promise to come back for a court date. Haitians’, if they even make it here without half the boat drowning, are arrested held in camps or facilities and then unceremoniously shipped off! Read a paper and learn something about the real immigration crises in this country. If we wanted Hispanics out we would put them out.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:48 pm
I didn’t see any indication of a Raised Seal. That’s the problem with computer copies – you can’t see the seal and without out that it’s not certified.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:48 pm
I really don’t care either way but “Scaredfor US” won the arguement hands down which is really funny because MANTIS was so offensive and now must be feeling a twit. Great blog and I learned a lot.
I learned that there are people out there that are not really stupid but very opinionmated such as Mantis but the really intelligent and educated people like “Scared…” make Mantis’s look stupid in a universally truthful kind of way.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:48 pm
How can anyone even consider anyone a racist when your hero obama has made it very clear he is in fact a racist and his friend henry gates is as well.And untill he discovered that other black scholars thought his statements were out of line did he decide to attempt to defuse the situation?All this racist crap is being kept alive by the black community because to admit racism is a dead horse,they would be admitting they are not a minority but an equal and heaven forbid they do that,the welfare would be cut off.Grow up,and get off your lazy ass like REAL Americans do
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:49 pm
Wait. You are not winning. Stop projecting. The Birther movement has just shown itself to be in the same vain as alien autopsies and the Boogeyman…..And, after the signs I saw from various 'tea parties' around the country, yes, racism is a part of it for so many rightwingers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:51 pm
That is not called for, I think your a moron for using language like that when someone doesnt agree with you. Very rude!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
They are still trying to find out Obama's birth certificate.
Get over with it idiots.
His mother is a US citizen and he is an automatic US citizen regardless wher ever he is born.
He was born in Hawai,ok.
Is that enough for people who is bickering about Obama's citizenship.
Stop these nonsens,republican.
How many times this citienship issuue came along and it was buried.
STOP BICKERING NOW AND GET WITH THE PRESIDENT and work towards our national pride,ok
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
Really? Who is it that is always talking about the “Socialist, Marxist, Democrat” (as opposed to Democratic) party again? I love how the right tries to distract from it's own name calling by accusing the other side of precisely what it is guilty of.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:53 pm
I think it's great how the pressure is building and building and building.
As the “birther” movement grows and grows, the “anti-birthers” grow more and more hysterical as they're reduced to hurling insults and accusations of “racism” because they have absolutely nothing else to argue with.
Obama can defuse the whole thing with one 30 second phone call, but he doesn't.
Kinda makes you go “Hmmmmmmmm …” doesn't it?
Where's the Birth Certificate?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:54 pm
Because it's true, like many people have pointed out John McCain was NOT born in America but his citizenship is not called into question. Don’t be upset your a racist you should embrace your ineptitude to see the person and not the skin. Sorry for you.
And yes Alan Keyes is a racist for questioning Obama's birthplace.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:55 pm
I really don’t care either way but “Scaredfor US” won the arguement hands down which is really funny because MANTIS was so offensive and now must be feeling a twit. Great blog and I learned a lot.
Well there you go. Barack Obama must not be a citizen because I offended a birther. Good thinking.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:55 pm
Funny how white Republicans are so sensitive to “reverse racism”, but regular racism doesn't seem to exist in their world.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:55 pm
Something I almost hate, but not quite as it's more like an annoyance akin to a gnat buzzing around one's ears (or would it be eyes in this case? or both ears and eyes!), is the misuse of words, e.g. their, there, and they're, which I believe is all too common amongst posters on here and elsewhere. This is not meant to imply hating the posters nor finding them annoying.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:55 pm
No he can't. (Defuse the whole thing with a 30 second phone call).
He's already released the birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:57 pm
ebonyangel/shedevil,you mam are the true racist.To blame the problems in america on bush it crazy,this crap started when the,Ididnt inhale,and I did not have sex with her came out of that lieing,adulterous clinton and has snowballed since.If you think for a minute that a 2yr senator is capable of running this country you are sadly mistaken and it is being proven by the around the world vacations the obama family has taken since being in office.Racism is your excuse for not being willing to take advantage of the opportunities the entire country has.It is alive only in those who claim its eyes.Racism died yrs ago the black activist just wont allow it to die,they themselves keep it alive and so do you ebony!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:58 pm
No, it doesn't. It makes us wonder about your sanity.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:58 pm
have you ever applied for gov. aid you need like 8 proofs of i.d. illigals dont get gov. help they cant even if they know it is available,they work for all there money and pay up front to go to the dr.Have you ever had to watch your family scrape out a life from nothing on a farm and still suffer from pverty and near starvation,your children,mother,wife?They do,all they want is a better life for thier family woludnt you?Using illigals as scape goats for our mistakes is becoming appalingly to commen as well as untrue,we(americans)get gov. help or go to the E.R. and dont pay,we live above our maens get in debt then want some one to blam look in the mirror,they dont get credit cards,or food stamps,or medicaid,they cant with out i.d. They live in run down houses work piece of crap low paying job and are put down or taken addvantage of by us and all the time are just grateful to have what little they have,no american would live like that we would get help from the gov.we need to remember what this country started as and is ment to stand for FREEDOM for all peopl,under god illigals are just peopl. who started with nothing and dont want their kids to grow up starving would you,how about you try understnding somthing before you critisize it,odds are your ancestors were immagrants to unless your an indian.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 1:59 pm
So, you're a “real American”? That is a shame, because you're sorely lacking in logical and reality.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:00 pm
Are we just counting American soldiers? I think if we counted EVERYONE killed like Iraqis and other nationalities than your figure may not be higher than the Iraqi war, plus abortion is between the woman who is having it and maybe her partner. Not you or anyone else. On the other hand, the war concerns us all.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:01 pm
[...] debunkers (there’s a job description) to trace the source document for the forgery (source: The Washington Independent). It’s a 1964 Australian birth certificate posted on a genealogy website and available to anyone [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
Wanting clarity on our presidents citizenship qualifications is not racist. Most people who have this concern (the ones you smear as 'birthers', just like the protesters you smeared as 'tea baggers' -both very derogatory) immediately laughed at the forged document, knowing it would be used as a tool to 'prove' that all birth questions are stupid.
I will go as far to say that you ebony angel are being racist by pulling the Gates strategy to use race as a tool for your own benefit. Don't worry though, I am sure you will convince yourself differently and will still be able to sleep well tonight.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
Wanting clarity on our presidents citizenship qualifications is not racist. Most people who have this concern (the ones you smear as 'birthers', just like the protesters you smeared as 'tea baggers' -both very derogatory) immediately laughed at the forged document, knowing it would be used as a tool to 'prove' that all birth questions are stupid.
I will go as far to say that you ebony angel are being racist by pulling the Gates strategy to use race as a tool for your own benefit. Don't worry though, I am sure you will convince yourself differently and will still be able to sleep well tonight.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
Or maybe he just knows his only chance of getting anywhere in politics is by being one of the few minority members of the Republican party. As much as they say they are against it, they do seem to have their own “affrimative action” program going on. (See Michael Steele)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
Well, duh! It WAS looked into before he was running for President. It was looked into when he entered the first grade. It was looked into when he got innoculations. It was looked into when he entered high school, applied for a passport, applied to college, applied to run for the Senate, etc. etc.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:03 pm
Dude learn how to spell or at the very least learn how to spell check. My mom would kick your…oh never mind. You arent worth it. And you just proved my point, racist!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
Makes sense to me that a guy who's lived his whole life in ustralia and posted his BC on the web in 2006…long before the Russian nutjob began her anti-Obama campaign…he's the one with the fake BC…not someone who photoshopped it and used it (outstandingly ineptly, I might add) s a template to pull of this fake.
I guess they were too lazy to try and obtain a real Kenyan BC from which to photoshop? One that wasn't on the web.
My gawd…their best defense for fraud is that their forgery was so shabby “we didn't think anyone would believe it.” But I wonder if auctioning this thing off on EBay constitutes interstate wire fraud? Orly Taitz it's said, paid $l000 for this…jeesh, if it were authentic don'tch think it would have gotten millions? But only Taitz was dumb enough to buy it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
In Hawaii, why dont you take a vacation and go see it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
I think that these debate about Obama's birth cert is very sickening; it potrays americans as speulators and rumour peddlers. It is just stupid. I think that the brains behind this devilish misinformation missed the train back in Denver.
They are in cahoots with author Corsi and lot other swift-boaters. They should have played this card may be even earlier, say during the Democratic nomination debates so that Clinton, Richardson, Biden, and other Americans, would have had the opportunity to make a timely investigation about the Obama-is-not-an-American saga.
What I think: t is too late for Americans to do anything about the Barak Obama presidency. The “nigger” WILL rule them and he will be a brilliant CEO, certainly better than the dullard called Bush. This is not something Americans, especially the bad losers, can help.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:06 pm
You just made a very racist comment in your post, Grow up and act like REAL Americans do. What is a real American, what makes you a real American?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:07 pm
Ah, I see that the morons on the political right are still sucking their thumbs after McCain and Palin went down in flames. Here's the thing – does anyone with half a brain (had to say that so that the conservatives wouldn't feel left out) really believe that either major party would ever allow an illegal resident to run for president? Please…..this is so stupid that it defies imagination. If this is the best you can come up with, then it's really better for the country that conservatives remain in the political minority. But after the recently-completed eight year fraternity party that was hosted by King George the Dimwitted, no one should be surprised at the intellectual dross that passes for conservative commentary these days.
For all of you moron Republicans (I know, redundant) who can't seem to read either the record or the Constitution, here's how it is: The Constitution doesn't allow for naturalized citizens to run for the presidency. That's why the conservative, spastic steroid user who was elected to the governorship in California will never be allowed to run. What the Constitution DOES require is that at least one parent be an American citizen. The country of birth is neither a qualifying nor disqualifying factor and is never mentioned in the Constitution. Citizenship is based solely on your parentage, NOT your place of birth. Obama's mother is American. Game over. If, as the birthers claim, your place of birth determined your eligibility, then McCain would have never been allowed to run, seeing as how he was born in…..oh yeah…..the Panama Canal (when his father was stationed there as a naval officer).
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:08 pm
I never made up birthers, or tea baggers. I think tea baggers was created by the tea bagging movement. LOL
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
1+1+1 equals what? You can't answer that one I bet. Bush came into a pile of cash Clinton left him. Clinton paid off Bush's Daddy and Ronnie's debt. NOW LET ME THINK wasn't Ronnie the balance the budget Prez? I am sick and tired of the GOP running its stupid mouth about us tax and spent Dems. ONLY A FOOL CUTS INCOME AND RAISES SPENDING LIKE YOUR BOY “W” he cut taxes saying it would raise everything while to only thing raised was unemployment. He weakened the dollar ON PURPOSE. You boys need to hide under a rock as the GOP and Rush need to be on Perkadan because of all the pain and suffering at their feet. The sad part is you idiots still vote for a FAILED party
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
Ed,
Please enlighten us with your obviously superior knowledge. I can't wait to learn from you!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
As Bill Maher said the other day…..Hey birthers! I'll show you Obama's birth certificate when you show me Sarah Palin's high school diploma!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
As Bill Maher said the other day…..Hey birthers! I'll show you Obama's birth certificate when you show me Sarah Palin's high school diploma!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:11 pm
Sorry if this has been mentioned already…but wouldn't the similarity in document form (not contents) be explained simply by the influence of British bureaucracy on both nations?
ice
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:12 pm
Or you let this joke of a conspiracy run it’s course and muddy the message from Conservatives (GOPer’s). There is zero credibility of the crazed “birthers” but for some odd reason, people believe them.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
No, he has NOT released the original long-form birth certificate. All he has released is a certification that the original exists.
Where is the original and why hasn't he released it?
… and notice how I'm called crazy just for asking a simple question?
What's it like to be True Believers who take on faith alone what Obama refuses to prove?
Is Obama like you new god or something?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
Where's the complete, originial, Hawaiian birth certificate? That document would end a lot of questions … but both sides have to play a game, claiming moral superiority, while there is hanging over the President a simple question: Where was he born? In one of his books, he claims to have been born in Kenya.
Produce the original, and the problem is solved.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
Where's the complete, originial, Hawaiian birth certificate? That document would end a lot of questions … but both sides have to play a game, claiming moral superiority, while there is hanging over the President a simple question: Where was he born? In one of his books, he claims to have been born in Kenya.
Produce the original, and the problem is solved.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
Where's the complete, originial, Hawaiian birth certificate? That document would end a lot of questions … but both sides have to play a game, claiming moral superiority, while there is hanging over the President a simple question: Where was he born? In one of his books, he claims to have been born in Kenya.
Produce the original, and the problem is solved.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
Your racist remark is disgusting. True “birthers” don't base their case on the obviously photoshopped Kenyan BC or the Australian fake that is probably the second in the series of “Obama Birth Certificates of the World” series that you can order for $19.95, proving he was born in each of the nations in the UN.
As you can see from this thread, there would have been Democratic birthers if McCain had won, just as there were birthers for a dozen or so other candidates for the US presidency in the past (all of the other candidates who had their citizenship questioned were white)
If it is ever found out that our currently legitimately elected president was not in fact eligible when elected, we will have one heck of a mess on our hands, but til they prove something, just let them run their mouths.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
Your racist remark is disgusting. True “birthers” don't base their case on the obviously photoshopped Kenyan BC or the Australian fake that is probably the second in the series of “Obama Birth Certificates of the World” series that you can order for $19.95, proving he was born in each of the nations in the UN.
As you can see from this thread, there would have been Democratic birthers if McCain had won, just as there were birthers for a dozen or so other candidates for the US presidency in the past (all of the other candidates who had their citizenship questioned were white)
If it is ever found out that our currently legitimately elected president was not in fact eligible when elected, we will have one heck of a mess on our hands, but til they prove something, just let them run their mouths.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You never saw any signs at the tea parties that were racist. You simply WANT to say that to bolster your argument. Were you at a tea party? The tea parties were not just a bunch of 'rightwingers' either. They were Americans of all parties and races who exercised their right to protest. It appears your goal is to call us names and show us as less than equal to your superior intellect.THAT IS RACIST Because the left has debunked a document – most likely created by the left – this does not erase all other doubt about the eligibility of Mr. Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
Freedom,
Grow up, learn to think, stop listening to Rush. He is getting rich off you nuts. Go back to school get an education that is the first rule. After that you might see the folly of your thinking pattern.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
Freedom,
Grow up, learn to think, stop listening to Rush. He is getting rich off you nuts. Go back to school get an education that is the first rule. After that you might see the folly of your thinking pattern.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
Obama's birth cetificate has been shown several times online by the state of Hawaii and the WH.
Look for it!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:14 pm
The age of the citizen parent is the main factor. But, the Paternal Father was a citizen of Kenya. The Mother was not old enough to pass on Citizenship to B.H.O. alias Barry Soetorro. Call me stupid? That might be so, although it would be for you to prove… I correctly call you ignorant. The proof has been documented with your comments.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:15 pm
As mentioned in the Snopes article, the seal is on the back side of
the document; if you look at it you can see markings from that, but
you’re right in that it’s not really “proof” of anything. A scan of
the back of the document wouldn’t “prove” anything, either — it
could, after all, be a scan of a different document. So the testimony
of those who’ve actually handled it is arguably better than offering
another JPEG, right? And reporters have indeed handled it and verified
that the mark is indeed there:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
Now, of course, those reporters could be lying. But I guess my bottom
line here is that at some point you have to stop and ask yourself how
far one needs to go to validate this: we have photographic evidence,
eyewitness testimony, newspaper records (which nobody seems to have
challenged the validity of), and of course the circumstantial evidence
that Obama has other documents — a driver’s license, a passport —
which normally require a certified birth certificate to obtain.
I think a lot of us just love conspiracy theories that suggest The
Other Side isn’t just proposing and enacting policies we don’t agree
with, but is somehow actively evil. So Bush is involved with the 9/11
attacks, or Hillary Clinton had Vince Foster killed. And I have little
doubt that had McCain won, there would be some core of people trying
to prove his birth circumstances disqualified him from being
president, too. But I think we love them because they provide
distractions from the disquieting truth that The Other Side is not
acting out of Illuminati-supported malice, but instead doing what they
think is the best for the country — and that an awful lot of our
fellow countrymen agree with them. That was true of Bush, and Clinton,
and Reagan. And it’s also true of Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:19 pm
If this is not true, I wonder why Obama doesn't settle the matter by producing his original birth certificate. I have a copy of mine, which you need to get any type of license, so I'm sure he has a copy of his.
BJ
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:21 pm
Dear recross1960. I'm assuming that's the year of your birth, so you can't claim youth as a defense against either ignorance or illiteracy.
My history books reveal that our 15th President, perhaps our greatest President ever, served as a two-year senator and then had the wisdom and strength to lead our nation through it's darkest moments.
Racism is an institutional fact that was shaped by 400 years of slavery. We are not quite a post-racial society, but we're close. It seems to me that the ones benefiting from the “race card” these days is the right, who have re-adopted the sick strategy of calling minorities “racists” when they do things like get nominated for the Supreme Court, win the Presidency, or get arrested in their own home.
I think our President is a great example of taking the opportunities that our country has to offer. From modest means, he is a self-made millionaire and has every potential to be remembered along with the pinnacle of the American Presidents – Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Kennedy – as one of the greatest ever.
Mr. Recross1960, you need to heed the words of our leader and add a two-year degree to your own resume. Or, at least hit the spell check function on whatever electronic gizmo you're using to rant here.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:22 pm
I doubt you need the original to get a license. What you need is simply an “Authentication of Live Birth”…not the full, original certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:23 pm
Well yose. Look again at that constitution your trying so diligently to spout quotes from. As a matter of fact, Obama's mother was one year shy of being considered eligible to pass on citizenship to her son. So yes I do think that a major party would allow such bullsh@t to transpire. They probably realized it to late and are trying to look less like a bunch of dumb@$$es than they already do. So shut up and let him prove it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:23 pm
Well yose. Look again at that constitution your trying so diligently to spout quotes from. As a matter of fact, Obama's mother was one year shy of being considered eligible to pass on citizenship to her son. So yes I do think that a major party would allow such bullsh@t to transpire. They probably realized it to late and are trying to look less like a bunch of dumb@$$es than they already do. So shut up and let him prove it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
It was looked into. He passed with flying colors. He's a natural born citizen. Get over it!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
In which of his books does Obama say he was born in Kenya? Title and page number please.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
He doesn't have to show you anything. He has satisfied the FBI and the Secret Service.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:25 pm
I would love to see the citation from “one of his books” where he claims to have been born in Kenya. If you can find that and post it, I'll personally send you a thousand dollars.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:26 pm
Your whackadoodlery is astounding Atlas. You outright reject any hard evidence that disproves your whacked out assertions and continue to assert falsehoods as though they were truths. And, for the record, comments that you are touched in the head aren’t ad hominem attacks. Your statements are proof that something ain’t quite right with you. Now, if someone were to say “You have sex with horses; therefore, your arguments concerning President Obama’s already proven US citizenship are invalid,” THAT would be an ad hominem attack.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:26 pm
Yosemitesam,
Does not sound like you are a very bright person at all. The problem with people like you is that you know you can not accomplish anything on your own so you are plenty happy to have a democrat lead congress to give you as much as they can so you can sit home on your computer that more then likely your mom or dad bought for you or maybe the goverment already bought it for you. You will never have your own business or contribute to society but you will spend your entire life whinning that the “rich” don't give you enough or the goverment should help you more. Why not get up each day and try working – several years from now you may actually feel good about yourself stop whinning and become something. Yosemtesam we can not take care of you every day of your life. Just because it looks like Obama lied at some point in his life with some type of misrepresentation of his birth cert –more then likely so he could get into an international school for free– doesn't mean that he can not be questioned about it. You and alot of lower intelligent people more then likely wiht out a job may think obama is your saviour but many of the rest of us who actually have jobs, businesses, and contribute to the world do not need a saviour. We have done it a different way then you are used too –it is called work!!!! Try it your life may change.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:26 pm
Listen. The State of Hawaii and its Republican governor have certified that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii as his birth certificate shows. This has been done twice already.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:26 pm
Listen. The State of Hawaii and its Republican governor have certified that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii as his birth certificate shows. This has been done twice already.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
“In one of his books, he claims to have been born in Kenya” Which book was that? Because I have read them and he says he was born in Hawaii. This all boils down to desperate, old, poorly educated, right wing white people who can think of nothing to do but make up crap, fling it as fast as they can, and hope some of it sticks. Your ideology has been proven to be bankrupt and you can't stand the thought of a black man getting credit for repairing the damage it has caused to our country. Get over it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
Don’t call me out without knowing anything about me, I have to say Mike you sound like someone who has absolutely NO black friends, and if you don’t cool. But I am not a racist, and I don’t like playing the race card. I think it undermines me and my achievements and the hard work of individuals before me. Its okay to disagree but when you have no basis for the disagreement people start looking for reasons. Please tell me why after six months in office, two years of running for president this crazy idea that Obama is not a citizen has taken such a hold of many people in America, why after all this time? Logical people have concluded it is because of the his race/skin color what ever you may call it. Now I did not come up with this theory on my own, plenty of people have come to the same conclusions. Can they all be wrong, well maybe they can but until I hear something a little more logical than “his dad wasn’t a citizen” then I will still believe that it is racism.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
Don’t call me out without knowing anything about me, I have to say Mike you sound like someone who has absolutely NO black friends, and if you don’t cool. But I am not a racist, and I don’t like playing the race card. I think it undermines me and my achievements and the hard work of individuals before me. Its okay to disagree but when you have no basis for the disagreement people start looking for reasons. Please tell me why after six months in office, two years of running for president this crazy idea that Obama is not a citizen has taken such a hold of many people in America, why after all this time? Logical people have concluded it is because of the his race/skin color what ever you may call it. Now I did not come up with this theory on my own, plenty of people have come to the same conclusions. Can they all be wrong, well maybe they can but until I hear something a little more logical than “his dad wasn’t a citizen” then I will still believe that it is racism.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
Don’t call me out without knowing anything about me, I have to say Mike you sound like someone who has absolutely NO black friends, and if you don’t cool. But I am not a racist, and I don’t like playing the race card. I think it undermines me and my achievements and the hard work of individuals before me. Its okay to disagree but when you have no basis for the disagreement people start looking for reasons. Please tell me why after six months in office, two years of running for president this crazy idea that Obama is not a citizen has taken such a hold of many people in America, why after all this time? Logical people have concluded it is because of the his race/skin color what ever you may call it. Now I did not come up with this theory on my own, plenty of people have come to the same conclusions. Can they all be wrong, well maybe they can but until I hear something a little more logical than “his dad wasn’t a citizen” then I will still believe that it is racism.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
That's a good one too. Who told you that, Mr. Constitution Expert? Where does it say what age a mother (or child) has to reach before being eligible to pass citizenship on to her son? Citation, please.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
That's a good one too. Who told you that, Mr. Constitution Expert? Where does it say what age a mother (or child) has to reach before being eligible to pass citizenship on to her son? Citation, please.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
He doesn't have the “original long-form birth certificate”. It's not in his possession. Every single birth certificate issued by the state of Hawaii is a “certification that the original exists.” The state, and no state in the union, refuses to release its original documents to any person. Think about it long and hard and you might be able to come up with a reason why that is.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
He doesn't have the “original long-form birth certificate”. It's not in his possession. Every single birth certificate issued by the state of Hawaii is a “certification that the original exists.” The state, and no state in the union, refuses to release its original documents to any person. Think about it long and hard and you might be able to come up with a reason why that is.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:29 pm
WRONG!
His daddy was a Kenyan citizen and was never an American citizen.
Read the Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 5: he must be a Natural Born Citizen to hold the office of POTUS.
Natural Born Citizen = TWO citizen parents and born on American soil.
He's a fraud and a usurper. He cannot be impeached because he's not a legal U.S. POTUS; he can, however, be arrested and thrown in jail along with the rest of his thugs.
Only a matter of time
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:29 pm
There is no such thing as “being eligible to pass on citizenship to her son.” This is just a bunch of made up bull. If she has a baby, he's a citizen. Period. And don't you think the FBI and Secret Service would have discovered any irregularities in his past? So, it's time for you to shut up. He doesn't have to prove anything to you.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:30 pm
King of Spades, man – King of Spades
And the Joker is an Albino.
All this broohaha keeps alot of people busy about nothing. Like a grand scale diversion that is harmless and takes up alot time and energy from alot of people who need to be kept busy and out of Big Brother’s hair.
Obama does lean too far to the left for me. But as long as he appears to make the effort to stay in the middle, I don’t really give a flying fern about the little bit of socialistic leanings.
Beware of conspiracies and rumors of conspiracies.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:30 pm
Perfect reply! I am so sad to hear someone born in the 60's is still clinging to that type of thinking when it comes to race relations.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:30 pm
Our Fifteenth President (James Buchanan) was a 40 year politician with 2 years in the senate and 10 years in the House of Representatives, along with being secretary of state.
Presumably you are speaking of our Sixteenth president, Abraham Lincoln. Please check your own facts before you rant about others.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:32 pm
I assume you are in agreement that the Kenyan birth certificate is fake then, since even it says that Obama's mother wast 18.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:33 pm
Stop for a moment and ask yourself if the FBI and Secret Service would have approved of Barack Obama's fitness to run for president if there was anything odd about his past. And, yes, you are “called crazy just for asking a simple question.” It shows you haven't looked in to the matter but have simply parroted the birthers' complaints.
The State of Hawaii has the original. Barack Obama cannot release it. He doesn't have it. Obama doesn't have to prove anything to you. He has been vetted by the FBI and Secret Service.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:33 pm
I don't think “birthers” are necessarily racists. I do think they are the dumbest people on earth. I sometimes think whether they are in fact aliens from another planet.
The Republican governor of Hawaii has stated very forcefully that he has seen the original birth certificate and so has the other other Hawaiian officials. It's there and it's real. From what I understand it's against state to make the original document of ANY citizen public. But, they have published the pictures of it online. If Republican “birthers” don't believe the Republican governor of Hawaii, then they really need to move to Finland or Iceland where they don't have to worry about a person of color winning an election. Those countries may still be a bit too socialist for them. So they're still out of luck. Maybe they can all board rocket ships and start a colony on the moon. I'll help pay for their one way tickets!!!
Jersey Ted
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:34 pm
Ah, how reasonable you seem, and how unreasonable everyone else appears for failing to satisfy your unsatisfiable desire for further proof of what is proven. The responsibility for backing up your absurd claims that Obama's presidency is the product of a 48 year conspiracy fall on you, not on the president. If the birther movement had real evidence, they would produce it, wouldn't they? In the meantime, I'd prefer for the president to work on fixing the problems that exist in real life.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:34 pm
All you have is a document created by the state in which you were born that certifies your birth. That's the exact same thing Obama has. He's released it to the media.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:36 pm
Since Yosemitesam used correct spelling and punctuation (something you lacked), I wouldn't think you would want to call him not a very bright person. And your argument about him not working is based on what? Insulting someone else by setting up a straw man is not a very good argument for your point of view.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:36 pm
Then-candidate Obama did release a certified copy of his Certification of Live Birth, in June 2008.
The Hawai'i Department of Health has officially acknowledged that they have his original Certification of Live Birth, and that it confirms his birth took place in Hawai'i, on August 4, 1961.
The highly-irrational Birthers, led by disbarred-lawyer/Dentist/Realtor Orly Taitz, claim that a Certification of Live Birth is not a 'Birth Certificate,' though that this the form of birth documentation that the state of Hawai'i confers and they claim that because Barack Obama, Sr. was not a U.S. citizen, that his son isn't either, despite the fact that Ms. Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's mother was a natural-born U.S. citizen.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:36 pm
I have read, on more than one occasion, that not only did the State of Hawaii issue a birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama, the two major Honolulu newspapers carried announcements of his birth (just as I am sure the “Meridian Star” in Meridian, Miss. carried an announcement of my birth on November 4, 1963. Or Nov. 5, considering that I was born at 5:30 PM.)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
Ah, if that was what “natural born citizen” meant, you'd really be on to something there. But wait: Thomas Jefferson's mother was born in London. That would make him a usurper too! Zomg!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Randolph_Jeff…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:38 pm
Q. When is a race card not a race card?
A. When race is the only relevant fact.
“Let’s face it: Presiden’t Obama’s black.” ~ Rush Limbaugh
The birthers and their cheerleaders are providing a textbook example of racial profiling.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:38 pm
Except that would not explain the identity of names of the officials, nor the fact that the record books have the same numbers typed in. To say that those were coincidences strains credulity. The fact that it has the same form as the one thats posted on the web several years ago WITH those numbers and names strongly implies that this document was the template.
Whoever did this was so stupid that the retyped the same names and registration book numbers in (although they did use the 43O47 “inside joke” which isn't on the BOMFORD BC).
also Kenya went to a decimal currency system in the l920's…yet the BC still uses pence.
Interesting that WDN hasn't produced it's copies of the “comparison BC's from Kenya” it claims to have checked. Odd that large numbers of Kenyans born in the '60's are claiming, and showing,BC's that look very different in style. I'm wondering if the WDN got their BC's from the same source as the “Obama” BC and didn't think…these might be phony as Brittney Spear's tata's, too.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:38 pm
When you ask the state of Hawaii to give you a “complete, original birth certificate,” they give you exactly the same thing that Obama got and has since released to the public. Do you know what the word “certificate” means? It's a “certification” by the state that it has checked its original records and verified a person's birth details. That's what Obama requested in 2007. If you're not willing to trust the state of Hawaii when it says it has certified his birth details, why are you bothering the rest of us with demands from the state of Hawaii at all?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:39 pm
Most Americans do not have the “original” birth certificate. They are kept in state files. My parents never had my original certificate. Mine is a certificate of birth registration stating the original is on file. Just like Obamas. The loonies who can not think for themselves will belive anything fox news, Rush or that idiot Lou Dobbs states.
Look at your own certificate. It is not the original. It is either a certiciate of live birth or a birth registration, not the actual certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:40 pm
“you do know that the definition of “natural born” is not codified anywhere including in the constitution” Maybe you should try to know what your talking about first…
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:41 pm
What's odd though is that NO hospital in Hawaii has any record of Obama's mother ever having been a patient there. Yet some claim he was born there and got dual-citizenship before going to Indonesia & becoming an Indonesian.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:42 pm
Wow. This website, and this topic, is a strong argument for increasing funding for education ten-fold. I know, you birthers and conservatives are thinking “yeah, those libs don't know how to think for themselves!” but really? You (90% of you, at least) are being had. All this jumping up and down about taxes? Do you all *really* make over $250k/year?? Really? Without being able to spell of complete a coherent thought? Huh. Interesting.
You're being convinced to rail against your won self-interests.
And this says nothing of this whole birther kerfufle. Seriously? Have you guys READ your own arguments? Have you WATCHED your de facto leader Orly Taitz? REALLY? THAT's what you're getting behind in all this?
Umm … ok. Good luck with that. If that's seriously going to be your play here, then my hat's off to you. Insanity like that can't be faked.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:42 pm
First, the fact that a birth certificate exists, in Hawaii, does NOT prove that Obama was born in Hawaii. Most states WILL issue a certificate, of some type, to someone not born in that State. Next, the governor of Hawaii is Female, not male. Next, SHE said she had the original, she never VERIFIED anything from that document. Next, many of the Obama supporters have claimed that the original has been destroyed, obvious contradiction there, huh? Next, which hospital was Obama born in? Official statements, from Obama's own supporters, list two DIFFERENT hospitals.
Me? I I think Obama's father was Communist Frank Marshal Davis, and that is why Obama has spent $800,000 to HIDE HIS PAST from the American people!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:43 pm
“What’s it like to be “True Believers” who take on faith alone what has not been proven?”
A) It has been proven, to any one who will rationally examine the facts.
2) None of the “birthers” believe in God then, right? Or live in glass houses!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:43 pm
I cn haz gud grammers, ok, lolol…..Anywho, actually, no. If his mother was a U.S. citizen, his father was not, regardless of where he was born, then he is born with dual citizenship. People born with dual citizenship can claim to be a citizen of either country until the date of their 18th birthday. This is the case for those claiming dual American citizenship, anyway, not sure if it's the exact same everywhere. Anyway, at that time, they must decide in which country they would like to be a citizen, and of course, there is paperwork. If the decision is not made, and/or forms not filed, then citizenship reverts to the country of birth. This was high school gov't class folks, of course the rampant need for a spellchecker (Hawaii is spelled with two i's, cupcake) on this site is cause for speculation that some of us didn't make it to senior year. o.O
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:46 pm
Obama can settle the whole issue once and for all…just release the vaulted copy,college records, etc. Let the truth speak for itself…then everyone can move on. Let transparancy shine.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:46 pm
What folly. If President Obama (Mr. Transparency) wanted to put an end to the qualifications controversy he could do so by releasing all of the records that have been kept secret better than CIA secrets. He surely knows what they say so he should know that the release cannot harm him. In general, if a policy does no harm to anyone and benefits some it is good policy. His policy of hiding his past does cause some people, maybe wishful thinkers that he can be removed from office, consternation. The policy of secrecy can't be better policy than releasing the records. I'd like to see an end to this loony business and President Obama can easily do that.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:47 pm
Of all the info that I have learned about this issue, I have never heard Rush or Fox news mention this issue (though I could have easily missed it). All has come from mainstream media or blogs (very different in content, accuracy and specificity), and a tiny bit of research. Lou Dobbs doesn't believe the birther nonsense either. But there are birthers out there who have legitimate points that haven't been addressed. All Dobbs did was allowed them a venue to speak, which reduces the conspiracy theories about not allowing this info to get out.
Obama is probably right in ignoring them, because once he answers their current questions they will undoubtedly come up with more, but it is ridiculous to call this racist.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:47 pm
Of all the info that I have learned about this issue, I have never heard Rush or Fox news mention this issue (though I could have easily missed it). All has come from mainstream media or blogs (very different in content, accuracy and specificity), and a tiny bit of research. Lou Dobbs doesn't believe the birther nonsense either. But there are birthers out there who have legitimate points that haven't been addressed. All Dobbs did was allowed them a venue to speak, which reduces the conspiracy theories about not allowing this info to get out.
Obama is probably right in ignoring them, because once he answers their current questions they will undoubtedly come up with more, but it is ridiculous to call this racist.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:47 pm
How convenient to make him responsible for your paranoia.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:48 pm
If you don't know how to spell, you are a racist? I really wonder why I am reading this nonsense from both sides. Wow, what a waste of time. Goodbye
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:48 pm
I was born in the same hospital as Obama, almost exactly 10 years later. My dad was military. I don't have the original birth certificate–no one has their original birth certificate. I have a copy of my birth certificate, issued by the state of Hawaii in 1987. It looks the exact same as Obama's. It is a short-form(?) “Certificate of Live Birth.” I have used it to get 2 passports and several driver's licenses. Are you saying that I am not a natural-born US citizen? That my parents did not have me in Hawaii at hospital? They also had birth announcements published in the Honolulu papers…this is so ridiculous!
p.s.–in what book did Obama claim to be born in Kenya? I would like the full citation (title, publisher, date of pub, page number). I think you are content to make stuff up
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
I am a registered Republican, voted dutifully for McCain, and would greatly welcome a competent and viable Republican candidate in 2012. I was upset when Obama won, but after he took the oath of office, he became my President. Do I like his politics… no. Do I like him as an individual… I have to say, yes. He seems to embody many of the qualities we like to see in our leaders. I would prefer to see a stronger system of checks and balances in this critical time (I don't like to see a super majority of either party, it's just not good for the people). But… he is my President. Forgive the male sports analogy, but I liken it to being a diehard football fan for your favorite team… and you find out that the star quarterback holds values opposite to yours. A true fan is not going to take that into consideration… a true fan is going to hope that the star quarterback performs as well as possible, so that the team does as well as possible. I will work to see that good decent Republican candidates win elections in 2010, but Barack Obama is my President until 2012 and while I will disagree with him at times, I will support him.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
I am a registered Republican, voted dutifully for McCain, and would greatly welcome a competent and viable Republican candidate in 2012. I was upset when Obama won, but after he took the oath of office, he became my President. Do I like his politics… no. Do I like him as an individual… I have to say, yes. He seems to embody many of the qualities we like to see in our leaders. I would prefer to see a stronger system of checks and balances in this critical time (I don't like to see a super majority of either party, it's just not good for the people). But… he is my President. Forgive the male sports analogy, but I liken it to being a diehard football fan for your favorite team… and you find out that the star quarterback holds values opposite to yours. A true fan is not going to take that into consideration… a true fan is going to hope that the star quarterback performs as well as possible, so that the team does as well as possible. I will work to see that good decent Republican candidates win elections in 2010, but Barack Obama is my President until 2012 and while I will disagree with him at times, I will support him.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
What a damning story that would be, were it in any way true. In real life, wild accusations such as your are generally required to be backed up by some type of evidence.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
What a damning story that would be, were it in any way true. In real life, wild accusations such as your are generally required to be backed up by some type of evidence.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:51 pm
Mine is not! I was born in NY and they do not give the original certificate. perhaps each state handles this differently. I do wonder why the Republican Goverernor of Hawaii would lie?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:51 pm
Florida, Indiana and New Jersey all require a CERTIFIED copy of the birth certificate to obtain a drivers license. That copy can only be obtained from the county of your birth. I have 5 extra copies because I had to have a copy for the Military when I joined back in 62, for a Police Dept when I went to the Police Training Academy in 70 and even when I applied for Social Security. SO, I'm quite sure that if someone is running for a public office, there has to have been a background check at some point. More so the higher the office and part of that background check includes the party running for that office providing a CERTIFIED copy of their birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:51 pm
How convenient to make him responsible for your thought process.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:52 pm
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Current law extends this to children born of two American citizens overseas, with at least one of the two parents having lived inside the USA. So McCain's a natural born citizen. So is the president, since he has valid proof of his birth in Honolulu, Hawaii. My god, have you guys never heard of google? Or Wikipedia?
As to the birther nonsense. A certified copy of the president's birth certificate has been provided to the press and is available for viewing on the internet . . . . and there are several mentions of the president's birth in Hawaiian newspapers at the time. Go to factcheck.org and view it all if you want.
Ask yourself this, if the president weren't black, if he were, say, the son of an Irish immigrant and an American mother, if his name was Barry O'Bama, would we be having this conversation?
Welcome to the desert of the real.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:52 pm
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Current law extends this to children born of two American citizens overseas, with at least one of the two parents having lived inside the USA. So McCain's a natural born citizen. So is the president, since he has valid proof of his birth in Honolulu, Hawaii. My god, have you guys never heard of google? Or Wikipedia?
As to the birther nonsense. A certified copy of the president's birth certificate has been provided to the press and is available for viewing on the internet . . . . and there are several mentions of the president's birth in Hawaiian newspapers at the time. Go to factcheck.org and view it all if you want.
Ask yourself this, if the president weren't black, if he were, say, the son of an Irish immigrant and an American mother, if his name was Barry O'Bama, would we be having this conversation?
Welcome to the desert of the real.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:52 pm
I'm one of those bleeding heart liberals that gets sick reading your GARBAGE. You folks live in a fantasy world. I don't know why we waste our time on people like you. You people are SOOOO sad.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:54 pm
How convenient to make him responsible for your thought process.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:54 pm
These two documents of Obama's place of birth maybe fraudulent, as I feel certain that they are but that still does not dismiss the fact that he needs to poster his real authentic birth certificate. That very limited informed birth certificate that they keep showing of his possible birth in Hawaii is not convincing enough to prove that he was born there. I am a 58 year old sixth generation Texan/African-American, who can trace my African ancestral lineage back to Jamestown Island, Virginia and among The Seminole Indian Tribe, down in Florida. I (my Mother) have the original copy of my lengthy authentic birth certificate and several copies of that in my personal possession; and I did not seek The Office of The President of The United States of America. All, that Obama have to do is bring forth a copy of his original birth certificate (the long authentic form). I was a thirty year Democrat, but after the fiasco that took place during the Democratic Primary, I left the association of myself with the Democrats. I am now proudly to say that I am proudly an Independent Voter because both of these defined parties are parties of whoremongering. I'm looking for the day, if it will ever come, that we can get back to a real Sovereign Nation that will be sustained by our Sovereign Laws. Votes did not put Obama in The White House, but Six Hundred and Sixty Eight Million Dollars ($668,000,000.00). I saw Congressman Lewis of Georgia, one day endorse Hillary Clinton, then suddenly the very next day after with Obama, he endorsed Obama. Only, 20% of the Black Voters voted for Obama, yet his camp greatly used The Race Card during his running. He is a bought piece, that is why The Law was not applied in the Gates/Crowley episode, but an embarrassing sit down over mugs of beer at The House of The People of The United States of America. Because of the tint of Obama's skin, he have as so many other Blacks brought a taint upon our credibility. We are such kiss-butts, in stead of standing up on the principle of Truth… Reverend Ira L. Lewis 2009B Conestoga Trail Austin, TX 78744-3568 5124431079 iradject@yahoo.com… I am a Licensed/Ordained Baptist Gospel (Jesus Christ) Minister a twice Honorably Discharged Disabled Navy Veteran a dba Business Owner, who is in my right mind by the Grace of GOD through His Son/Word (Jesus Christ).
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:55 pm
You forgot to explain how Obama went back in time to have his birth announcements planted in two Hawaiian newspapers.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:55 pm
What a liar. No one in their right mind that has any centrist or right values can stomach Oba-mao.
Nice try, Obot.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:56 pm
Carl4432,
Instead of empty words quote me some facts!!! I am challenging your superior intellect, show us that you are capable of actual thought rather than merely regurgitating empty, meaningless, statements every liberal talk show host (and yes I listen to them and not to Rush or Sean) has repated ad nauseum. Give me facts, son, not your nonsense, By the way before you make a bigger fool of yourself read some up on some economics, read up on some some recent history about how enlightened Europe is sloowly moving away from the Socialist model, read up how communism failed. Oh, before I forget… the GAO (know who they are, kid?!?) also thinks Obama's Theory of Economics is disastrous. Look it up and then I want to see you show off your brilliance. Oh, and please stop foaming at the mouth… it's bad for your heart, kid.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:56 pm
Of course, I'm not holding the most powerful office in the nation, either.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:56 pm
Of course, I'm not holding the most powerful office in the nation, either.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:57 pm
A red herring … yeah, that’s the ticket.
Supply a high-profile birther with an obviously fake birth certificate so when it’s revealed as obviously fake all the birthers hide their faces in shame and Obama is free to pursue his nefarious plans to destroy the USA.
Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:57 pm
“Scared” outdid you by facts, logic and powerful prose. You ended up only with attitude as your defense after he destroyed all your points.
Its no big deal, he made you look silly.
As for Obama, who really cares? If he does the country in, good p[eople will vote him out and reverse his idiocy. If he is as good as Dems say he is – and comes up good on economy netc – I’m all for it. Still think he is suspect for not releasing his documents.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:57 pm
Have you ever took a mental health test?
What year is it? What day is It?
Where are you right now?
Who is the President?
NOW GET OVER IT
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:58 pm
I am not the one who isn't thinking this through. The evidence that has been released should offer sufficient proof to anyone who is the least bit objective. Neither Obama nor anyone else has the slightest duty to cater to the paranoid ramblings of people who are desperate to overturn the previous election under any flimsy pretext.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 2:59 pm
Another point: Kenya and Australia BOTH were former British colonies. It is not at all surprising that documents, from both, from this time period, would look nearly identical. It is also not at all surprising that the same name would be appear, as a son or other relative could EASILY have followed in the footsteps of another family member, and entered “foreign service”.
The “anti-birthers” do not have their facts straight.
Many of us “birthers” simply want to know the truth. I admit I do not know the truth, but I know pure BS when I hear it, and most of the BS, on this issue, comes from Obama supporters.
This BC thing is part of a bigger story: What if?: Obama LIED in his own books, about Obama's past. Obama LIED in his college entrance paperwork. Obama LIED in his college financial aid requests. Obama's parenced RENOUNCED any US Citizenship, as part of the Indonesian adoption.
Face it, you do not know the facts, and you do not WANT to know the facts!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:00 pm
DID YOU HERE ABOUT THE …. WORLD TRADE CENTER ?????
IT WAS ISRAELI’s THAT BROUGHT THE BUILDINGS DOWN IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!
SO THE US WOULD GO AFTER THE MUSLIMS….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:01 pm
Monitor, Can you proof to me that your birth certificate says “Birth Certificate” and not any other phrase?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:01 pm
Not all of us are political reactionaries, you know, and we don't all see things from your point of view. Supporting your president whether or not you fully agree with him was considered a virtue under the last administration.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:01 pm
If you really think it's loony, why do you keep questioning?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:01 pm
As a lifelong Democrat, I have to say that Obama is worse than Bush by a country mile and that Hanover Rocky is nuts.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:01 pm
[...] The Washington Independent » Is This the Source of the Forged … [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:03 pm
Let’s see, two years ago unemployment was lower than it is now because unemployment is a lagging indicator, companies lay people off AFTER the economy starts getting bad – so you have no point there.
8 years ago I felt safe from terrorists and then we were attacked on 9/11. The fact that the united states was not hit again by a major terrorist attack means nothing because 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch — he was not able to keep us safe. Stop with you’re scaremongering and contribute something real to the conversation.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
Hillary’s the mother of “Birthers” – August 23, 2008 A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.
Philip Berg, the filing attorney, is a former gubernatorial and senatorial candidate, former chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery (PA) County, former member of the Democratic State Committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. According to Berg, he filed the suit–just days before the DNC is to hold its nominating convention in Denver–for the health of the Democratic Party.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:06 pm
The birthers are not “idiots,” they are just going through a bit of therapy.
Look: their entire world-view has been demonstrated wrong by 8 years of Republican mismanagement. That's a real strain on the noggin! There is bound to be a lot of irrational paranoia until this cognitive dissonance sorts itself out.
The teabaggers are no different. Every single one of the things they complain about is indeed a bad thing — unfair taxes, government intrusion, etc. — but their brains are literally blind to this stuff happening when Republicans are in charge. That's just the nature of the partisan brain. Now that Democrats are running things, their brains recognize that the policies of the last 6 years were REALLY stupid, but the only way they can deal with reality sucking is by blaming the Democrats. Ask them for a specific policy they hate, and doubtless it was initiated and/or supported by Republicans.
Until they are done ranting, venting, and acting like emotional little girls, they will be immune to logic. So stop trying.
My advice? Let them rant. They'll feel a lot better, and then we can all move on.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:06 pm
Evidently you are the one intellectually challenged. I can get a certificate of live birth from Hawai'i and I live in Texas. It really is that easy. A few dollars and a witness statement is all that is needed. A birth certificate requires much more scrutiny and is why it is required for a passport. It is also why I want the President to follow the same rules as I have to follow. When applying for a job, show legal (birth certificate) qualifications to work in the U.S. and face termination if such documents presented are found to be a forgery. Produce the original certificate and get this matter behind us. Easy. Even Barack should be able to accomplish that between his taxpayer funded vacations around the globe.
Also, no new taxes or tax hikes on those making less than $250K? Get real! His administration just sent the Treasury Secretary out on TV Sunday telling us all the middle class was going to have to pay more taxes to get the deficitg down.
David, you seem like a common guy, a decent citizen. Do not let partisan hatred blind you to the obvious fact we have an incompetent person in the White House. He has committed every citizen in this country to more debt than his 43 predecessors combined. And he has growing unemployment, nobody buying Treasury notes, declining consumer confidence, and less respect around the world daily. Add to this a weakening of our defense forces and inserting himself into a misdemeanor police case (the Gates arrest) and you have to wonder how much damage this President can really accomplish.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:07 pm
Surely Hillary Clinton isn't responsible for every one of her supporters. Berg is a nut, no matter where his political preferences lie.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:07 pm
If you're really a minister why do you keep lying? He's shown his genuine certified BC, confirmed (repeatedly) by the Hi. DOH. It's the only kind of certified BC Hi. gives out. 36 other states also either give short forms by preference, or, like Hi., ONLY give short forms. It legally proves he was born in Honolulu Hi. He's already proven his citizenship far beyond what any prior President has even been asked to do, so do you wonder why people think some's unwillingness to accept his eligibility, in spite of overwhelming evidence, might have something to do with racism?
And only 20% of black voters voted for him? What planet are you from?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:10 pm
Just as my father had his death notice placed in papers in Indiana, Texas, California, and New York. Family often places obituaries and birth notices in papers other than where the event happened. Do you have a copy of the birth notice – and did it say he where he was born? That would be more proof than most birthers have seen and would satisfy many of them.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
Yes, because it's a good idea for the President of the United States to capitulate to this kind of terrorism-by-tantrum. Wonderful idea.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
It's politics as a team sport, I think. You love that quarterback until he starts to play for the rival team and then suddenly he's your very worst enemy. For what I hope is a noisy minority on both sides of the aisle, politics isn't really about ideas — it's about having your side on top and blinding yourself to what happens after that.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
Sir, I say this sincerely: seek professional help. Your delusions may make you a danger to yourself and others.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
Sir, I say this sincerely: seek professional help. Your delusions may make you a danger to yourself and others.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
State your source, please, for the news that NO hospital in Hawaii has any record.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
State your source, please, for the news that NO hospital in Hawaii has any record.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:12 pm
Do the birth announcements in the Honolulu papers say “where” he was born? Does it name the hospital? Or just the parents address? If it just announces his birth, playing Devil's Advocate here, even if he was born in Kenya, it would have been on a short visit to that country, with his parents still maintaining an apartment in Honolulu. Why wouldn't they have, or the grandparents have announced the birth regardless of place in the hometown newspaper? They lived there.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:12 pm
Wow. Lighten up! The man is just expressing his opinion. That's the freedom of speech
that you right wing wackos are always whining about.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:12 pm
Wow. Lighten up! The man is just expressing his opinion. That's the freedom of speech
that you right wing wackos are always whining about.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:13 pm
Kinda like how my birth announcement was in paper in Indiana, Kentucky, North and South Carolina and Arizona? It's called proud parents, cupcake. Proud parents (or grandparents, whatever) extending their joy to friends and family as far as they can reach.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:13 pm
Al Gore catered to people desperate to overturn the election? How, by bowing out of the race gracefully after the Supreme Court decision?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
The forger had to obtain a suitable facsimile of an aged birth certificate. This looks like it.
I know a forger who makes 100k per year. He says obtaining the actual paper is where you have to start, but it's a lot easier to modify a digital image. The second trick is to change a single letter in someone's name so it it is harder to trace the source.
I've see the digital image, but has anyone examined Orly's actual document?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
Wow. Lighten up. They are just expressing their opinion. That's the freedom of speech
that you righties are always whining about.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:15 pm
“For the believer no proof is necessary, for the non-believer no proof is possible.” Stewart Chase 1929
I doubt this will end before 2016 … might even continue on after … sort of like the investigation into whether bush/cheney broke any laws during their reign of lies and terror.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:15 pm
Love how birthers keep coming up with these dollar figures on how much he's supposedly spent defending frivolous law suits that have all been immediately dismissed by the courts.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:16 pm
Yes, well, if only. Leaving these people to work out their therapy is to simply give a green light to their rantings. They take silence as encouragement. The best way to deal with whatever flat earth BS the right wing spews is to come down on it like a ton of bricks ASAP. The mistake Democrats, Liberals and Progressives have made since the Reagan era is to “take the high ground” and hope lies and nonsense will evaporate on their own. Instead, in the absence of challenge, they've grown into mythology. It's a waste of time and tactics to think you're going to change these people's world view. That goes without saying. What you can do is keep knocking the legs out from under their lies.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:18 pm
I don't normally describe birthers this way, but this comment is absolutely precious. The exact same form shows up with the same page number, same book number, same registrar names, etc., and FactsObama is whimpering to himself in the corner about how it must be real, just must. Someone needs a hug. Don't worry, buddy, someone will come up with a new forgery in a little while and you can get excited about that one!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:18 pm
His mother was a U.S. Citizen, his father Kenyan, he had dual citizenship the second he took his first breath, regardless of where that was.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:19 pm
Paco, remember that I said I do not like his politics, and that I will work to see that viable Republicans win their elections next year. Will you do the same? I challenge and encourage you to to apply your passion in that direction. To apply any effort or energy toward any other aspect of the office and the man is a waste of time, and quite frankly, it is what tarnishes those who try to merely outshout the opposition. My advice to all those who are pursuing or can't let go of these side issues… try and step back from the trees and grasp the sheer scope of the forest. Change, real change begins when we can see the big picture and can work… together… to make a difference. While many “good” people demand answers regarding birth certificates that will never be forthcoming… many good people are working quietly and tirelessly behind the scenes in preparation for the 2010 elections. Put away the rhetoric, and join us…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:19 pm
good lord…some of the comments here are hysterical. wake me in a year.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:20 pm
You think a pregnant woman living in Hawaii would take a “short visit” to Kenya?
Have you been pregnant?
Most women not named Sarah Palin don't go jetting around the world when their baby is due.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
“Scared” outdid you by facts, logic and powerful prose.
All without facts or logic. Quite impressive!
You ended up only with attitude as your defense after he destroyed all your points.
Except he didn’t. Oops.
Still think he is suspect for not releasing his documents.
I think you’re suspect. Release your documents!!!!!11!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:21 pm
I just wish O.B. would put this all too rest and stop spending millions to keep his records sealed. If he has nothing to hide then please show it and be done with it!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:21 pm
Then do it and show everyone. Spend a “few dollars” and get a witness to claim you were born in Hi. and see how that works out for you.
He's shown his BC. It's the only kind they issue in Hi. He HAS a passport which he got with a certificate just like that one. He has a drivers license too. Guess what he used to get THAT?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:22 pm
Wow. You’re crazy. I don’t really comment here (just browse the comments for fun), but wow. 20% of black voters voted for Obama….uh…wow. “Fully 96 percent of black voters supported Obama and constituted 13 percent of the electorate” ..http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15297.html
Votes did not put Obama in the White house? Now I admit the money bought the votes (like every election)…but uh…yeah the votes did put him in the white house
“That very limited informed birth certificate that they keep showing of his possible birth in Hawaii is not convincing enough to prove that he was born there”….that is an official state document, backed up by an official statement.
I know you did not bring this up, but I googled Hawaii birth certificate. The long version everyone talks about is also called “Certificate of Live Birth”. Same thing….less info. But the short form does list City/Town, Island and County of Birth, which debunks all the ..”could have been born elsewhere” craziness.
But I guess if you believe there is an invisible man is the sky watching everything you do, then I guess you’ll believe anything.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:22 pm
“Many of us “birthers” simply want to know the truth.”
That's just a bold-faced lie. You've been told the truth time and time again but simply refuse to accept it!
It must be hard to accept that a black man is the President of the USA, right?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
I could produce a 'birth certificate' that says he was born in Paris, with a little help from my friend Photoshop. Why is that more believable than the word of the Hawaiian government and the hospital, saying he was born there and his birth certificate is entirely proper and valid?
The idea that every pundit and doubter has to hold 'the original' in their own hands is absurd — I can't get the original of my own certificate let alone someone else's. Everything is on microfiche or computer now, and even if you look up the original record in storage, you aren't allowed to take it anywhere.
If you'd like to substantiate your claims about his parents renouncing citizenship (what exactly is the process for that) please link to a verifyable source. You know, that I can hold in my hands and check for photoshopping.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
I could produce a 'birth certificate' that says he was born in Paris, with a little help from my friend Photoshop. Why is that more believable than the word of the Hawaiian government and the hospital, saying he was born there and his birth certificate is entirely proper and valid?
The idea that every pundit and doubter has to hold 'the original' in their own hands is absurd — I can't get the original of my own certificate let alone someone else's. Everything is on microfiche or computer now, and even if you look up the original record in storage, you aren't allowed to take it anywhere.
If you'd like to substantiate your claims about his parents renouncing citizenship (what exactly is the process for that) please link to a verifyable source. You know, that I can hold in my hands and check for photoshopping.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
I could produce a 'birth certificate' that says he was born in Paris, with a little help from my friend Photoshop. Why is that more believable than the word of the Hawaiian government and the hospital, saying he was born there and his birth certificate is entirely proper and valid?
The idea that every pundit and doubter has to hold 'the original' in their own hands is absurd — I can't get the original of my own certificate let alone someone else's. Everything is on microfiche or computer now, and even if you look up the original record in storage, you aren't allowed to take it anywhere.
If you'd like to substantiate your claims about his parents renouncing citizenship (what exactly is the process for that) please link to a verifyable source. You know, that I can hold in my hands and check for photoshopping.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:26 pm
For the umpteenth time – like most places, official birth announcements are run in Hawaii based on reports from the Department of Vital Records, who in turn get their information from the local hospitals. Has been that way pretty much forever. So its not an announcement of every birth everywhere, but births in Hawaii.
The only answer to get around this Orly & co. have is to slander Obama's dead relatives by saying someone lied and filled out a declaration of birth with the Hawaiian state authorities to evade immigration costs. After all, you make the moonbat decision to travel to Africa 9 months pregnant, have the money for a “brief” transcontinental trip, have your baby in Zanzibar of all places, but don't want to deal with immigration hassles so you lie about the place of birth. And apparently smuggle the newborn through customs in both Zanzibar and the US (with multiple stopovers, mind you) with no one being aware of the baby's presence or questioning the child's status. Never mind that there's nothing but Taitz' less than credible word for the ability to even get such a form, the grand Dunham family birth conspiracy, etc. Because Occam's razor be damned if the evidence doesn't fit your preconceived prejudicial ideas – it must be a conspiracy, darn it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:27 pm
Can you prove that, marshmallow? And I need to see originals, not copies, of those birth announcements. Please forward them to my dentist, I mean realtor, I mean lawyer, Orally Teetz.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
You wouldn't know a fact if it planted its boot in your butt. All the evidence in the world has been piled in front of you and you people won't accept it. And you are living proof that the right wing lives and works and in Crazy Town. Here's a fact for you: the black guy won the election. Get over it. You're not going to turn it over. Ain't gonna happen. Your desperate little white man's paranoid fantasy is based on lies and easily disproved facts. When people persist in believing things in the absence of proof, or despite having been disproved, that's called…insanity.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
The Question is “Why aren't we seeing the long birth certificate that must exist if this guy really was born where he claims”?
What is Mr. Transparency afraid of?
Here's what I'm afraid of: This guy was backed by big Islamic money, much of it 'funnelled' through the honorable rev. wright's church of hate and he is bankrupting us, eroding our national defenses and undeniable out to take away our freedoms including the freedom to express our opinions. Sotomayor? If you can't see that this is a racist fascist – then you're one of them.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
The Question is “Why aren't we seeing the long birth certificate that must exist if this guy really was born where he claims”?
What is Mr. Transparency afraid of?
Here's what I'm afraid of: This guy was backed by big Islamic money, much of it 'funnelled' through the honorable rev. wright's church of hate and he is bankrupting us, eroding our national defenses and undeniable out to take away our freedoms including the freedom to express our opinions. Sotomayor? If you can't see that this is a racist fascist – then you're one of them.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
Send in the clowns. Send in the clowns. Don't bother their here!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
Send in the clowns. Send in the clowns. Don't bother their here!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
You wouldn't know a fact if it planted its boot in your butt. All the evidence in the world has been piled in front of you and you people won't accept it. And you are living proof that the right wing lives and works and in Crazy Town. Here's a fact for you: the black guy won the election. Get over it. You're not going to turn it over. Ain't gonna happen. Your desperate little white man's paranoid fantasy is based on lies and easily disproved facts. When people persist in believing things in the absence of proof, or despite having been disproved, that's called…insanity.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
You wouldn't know a fact if it planted its boot in your butt. All the evidence in the world has been piled in front of you and you people won't accept it. And you are living proof that the right wing lives and works and in Crazy Town. Here's a fact for you: the black guy won the election. Get over it. You're not going to turn it over. Ain't gonna happen. Your desperate little white man's paranoid fantasy is based on lies and easily disproved facts. When people persist in believing things in the absence of proof, or despite having been disproved, that's called…insanity.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
You wouldn't know a fact if it planted its boot in your butt. All the evidence in the world has been piled in front of you and you people won't accept it. And you are living proof that the right wing lives and works and in Crazy Town. Here's a fact for you: the black guy won the election. Get over it. You're not going to turn it over. Ain't gonna happen. Your desperate little white man's paranoid fantasy is based on lies and easily disproved facts. When people persist in believing things in the absence of proof, or despite having been disproved, that's called…insanity.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
There are many effective treatments for schizophrenia today – talk to your psychiatrist.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
Sorry. You can only blame one-third of that disaster on Obama (and maybe yourself, since everyone else’s is going up). You have to blame two-thirds of it on Bush.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
All this talk about a birth certificate is funny. Obama deserves to be President since he planned his own lies before he was born. He was born in kenya and as a baby convinced everyone that he was born in HI. Just for that great effort to lie as a unborn baby makes him worthy of being President. Now doesn't this all make perfect sense. Give me a break people! Please complain about something relevent. The economy, world peace or something. A birth certificate lord have mercy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
All this talk about a birth certificate is funny. Obama deserves to be President since he planned his own lies before he was born. He was born in kenya and as a baby convinced everyone that he was born in HI. Just for that great effort to lie as a unborn baby makes him worthy of being President. Now doesn't this all make perfect sense. Give me a break people! Please complain about something relevent. The economy, world peace or something. A birth certificate lord have mercy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
All this talk about a birth certificate is funny. Obama deserves to be President since he planned his own lies before he was born. He was born in kenya and as a baby convinced everyone that he was born in HI. Just for that great effort to lie as a unborn baby makes him worthy of being President. Now doesn't this all make perfect sense. Give me a break people! Please complain about something relevent. The economy, world peace or something. A birth certificate lord have mercy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
I can't help but laugh at the losers and the dummies that are spending their time and money to prove Obama wasn't born in the US. Keep up the distractions. Obama and the Democratic congress will continue with their agenda. And in the end, Obama is still president and there is nothing you can do about it. lol
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
I can't help but laugh at the losers and the dummies that are spending their time and money to prove Obama wasn't born in the US. Keep up the distractions. Obama and the Democratic congress will continue with their agenda. And in the end, Obama is still president and there is nothing you can do about it. lol
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
I can't help but laugh at the losers and the dummies that are spending their time and money to prove Obama wasn't born in the US. Keep up the distractions. Obama and the Democratic congress will continue with their agenda. And in the end, Obama is still president and there is nothing you can do about it. lol
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
Sorry to repost:
QUESTION: “Can anybody answer why this guy refuses to produce the long birth certificate that would once and for all put this to rest?”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
Sorry to repost:
QUESTION: “Can anybody answer why this guy refuses to produce the long birth certificate that would once and for all put this to rest?”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:33 pm
Sorry to repost:
QUESTION: “Can anybody answer why this guy refuses to produce the long birth certificate that would once and for all put this to rest?”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:35 pm
Don't know what world you've been living in, but I got an Indiana Driver's License in 1998 with nothing but my California license and social security card. I haven't used a birth certificate for anything since I got my first passport in 1996 since passports stand alone, and a photo id and social security card is enough for just about anything (other than the few times you also need a utility bill).
A certified copy is what Obama posted, by the way. Some states used to issue both unofficial (no seal) and official (sealed) copies, charging you for the latter. Hawaii only has one form that it will issue – the short form.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:35 pm
Don't know what world you've been living in, but I got an Indiana Driver's License in 1998 with nothing but my California license and social security card. I haven't used a birth certificate for anything since I got my first passport in 1996 since passports stand alone, and a photo id and social security card is enough for just about anything (other than the few times you also need a utility bill).
A certified copy is what Obama posted, by the way. Some states used to issue both unofficial (no seal) and official (sealed) copies, charging you for the latter. Hawaii only has one form that it will issue – the short form.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:36 pm
Yeah, if your toddler throws a tantrum. Do you pay attention or ignore it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:37 pm
I like how, when you guys get caught in your own BS, your eyes roll back in your heads and you start jabbering about Socialism. A little trouble staying on topic, Mr. Superior Intellect? Here's the deal. It's isn't up to Obama to disprove your crazy assertions. It's up to YOU to prove them. And so far, you brain damaged birthers haven't done anything except pound the table with your fists and insist that all the evidence isn't enough. Nothing will ever be enough for you clowns.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:38 pm
You would have lost your job and your portfolio had McCain won. You can thank your beloved George W and his base. The Have’s and Have-More’s. They made out with a trillion dollar tax give away during time of war, they drove our economy into the ground, and NOW you’re complaining? It’s called “chicken’s comin’ home to roost” Cass. You voted for them now you and the rest of us have to live with their lousy governance. Yeah, I guess helping people buy cars with better gas mileage and helping car dealerships is a waste. (what I find so ironic, is that the majority of car dealerships are owned by Republicans who donate big money to the GOP. Wonder how they feel about their corporate masters now) Of course in your universe, if it doesn’t benefit the wealthiest then it’s a “waste of taxpayers dollars”. Apparently you don’t mind the billions were spending in Iraq every month but then it benefits Bush’s buddies- Halliburton, KBR, Bechtal, Blackwater, and all the many thousands of war profiteers. I’m still wondering what happened to that nine million that went missing in Iraq about five years ago. Yet not one peep of complaint out of your trollish lips. Yeah, it’s a pity that the GOP can’t continue to turn our great nation into just another third world country through their shining incompetence. We won, now you can listen to the same BS I had to hear for eight years of Bush/Cheney…GET OVER IT!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:40 pm
What millions? Credible sources, please.
Oh wait, you can’t – because you’re a liar!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:40 pm
The more I read these kind of lies, the more I become a birther. I would have no problem with a black president. I also have no racial problems with our current president, who is half white, raised by whites and asians (his step-father), and who always attended elite private schools in Hawaii, Indonesia, California and Massachusetts. There are many black “birthers”, just as most whites are not birthers. Why is it that our President's defenders are the first to play the race card?
We have been told a whole bunch of facts – but not the facts that were asked for. Birthers cite a whole bunch of facts – and these fake Kenyan and Aussie birth certificates are hardly ever part of the discussion. Many states do show original documentation from the hospital or other application to register the birth to the public, though getting a “Certified Birth Certificate” is reserved for the parents and child. Just a few minutes of thought would tell you that a birth certificate is not irrefutable – there are forgeries and people who obtain theirs by lying to the state government. The likelihood is so small we usually don't consider the issue, but when stakes are high, a higher standard of proof is required.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:41 pm
If you think that would put an end to it then you haven't been paying attention. Can you think of any good reason why he should capitulate to nutballs who've already demonstrated they're unwilling to accept overwhelming evidence?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:42 pm
I usually point and laugh. It works. They get embarrassed and then they pout.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:42 pm
I usually point and laugh. It works. They get embarrassed and then they pout.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:43 pm
I like how, when you righties get caught in your own BS, your eyes roll back in your heads and you start jabbering about Socialism. A little trouble staying on topic, Mr. Superior Intellect? Here's the deal. It's isn't up to Obama to disprove your crazy assertions. It's up to YOU to prove them. And so far, you brain damaged birthers haven't done anything except pound the table with your fists and insist that all the evidence isn't enough. Nothing will ever be enough for you clowns.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:43 pm
hey liberal idiots:
His mother did not conceive of him becoming president. But she did want him to be a US citizen. It's a simple answer for simple minds.
The fact that you all present this idiotic logical line that since he ended up president that is why she connived her way into getting him falsely documented shows you can't think past the level of an idiot.
Which is why this country is in so much trouble. There's 10's of millions of idiots. Not to mention minority racists. And minority racists running the country who defend the racism.
I'm still waiting for an answer to the real question:
“Why not produce the long birth certificate that will end all of this?”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:45 pm
Let;s see, this time 2 years ago I was gainfully employed, living in a country where I felt safe from terrorist and I didn't worried about leaving my grandchildren in overwelming debt. Your right I guess it was that Saudi huge that help me realize how much better off we are now.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:47 pm
My comment about only 20% of the overall voting for Obama was from The Black Voters. That is a documented fact that was presented just days after the November 2008 Election. You should research you claim further and I am glad that you admitted that money bought him The White House, though you are not clearly admitting THAT. GOD Bless You.
Ira L. Lewis
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:47 pm
No, politics is about one thing…getting re-elected.
“What can I do to make it so that I can keep using tax money to pay for my (gambling, pot, stripper, insert vice here) habit?”
I for one am voting against all incumbents, regardless of party affiliation, until we get some REAL fkn change. We need to remind them, that at least for the time being, this is still a government of, for and by the people.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:47 pm
The dems can never answer one fact:
Obama has not produced his birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:48 pm
No, insantiy is repeating the same task over and over and over, and expecting a different outcome. What you describe is simply denial.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:51 pm
The point is Mccain showed his longform birth certificate whether you liked him or not he proved BEYOND A DOUBT that he was a NATURAL citizen ! when will Obama just produce the long form and shut everyone up? I mean seriously how long does it take to just post it and be done with it! Why even let this stuff drag on if there is no need ! I am not racist , I just want to know that he is really supposed to be there , then i will fully support him. Until then , I just cannot
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
There isn't overwhelming evidence. The overwhelming evidence of authenticity would be the long birth certificate. The fact that he hasn't produced it is the problem in and of itself. He is the president for crying out loud. I have mine in the safe and have no problem whatsoever with showing it. It raises the legitimate question :”Why won't the president produce a simple document to end controversy – except that perhaps he really isn't a citizen?”. You defend him because you put your faith in him. That's just plain stupid. You should question his motives too. If it's as purile a reason as you state – that he doesn't want to nah-nah-nah, then he is not worthy of the office.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
Why is it that our President's defenders are the first to play the race card?
Cause that's the game they were taught. Someone's saying something negative about you? Must be cause you're black, right? Couldn't be that skin tone has nothing to do with it, and you're just unqualified…..
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
If Obama didn't have anything to hide, and it seems he does, he would have released all his records including his birth certificate, BEFORE the election!!! He didn't run to Hawaii to see his ailing white grandmother, he went there for the purpose of having the Governor seal all his personal records—sounds like a cover up to me!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
So what's your theory there Elmer? She's 9 months pregnant, get's on a plane to have her baby in Kenya, then four days later (with a less than a week old newborn in tow) she's back in Hi. placing birth announcements in newspapers and convincing the DOH that he was born in Hi.?
And if that is your theory why do you need to see his original BC? Obviously it's not going to prove anything to you. You'll just believe she lied about where he was born way back when.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
So what's your theory there Elmer? She's 9 months pregnant, get's on a plane to have her baby in Kenya, then four days later (with a less than a week old newborn in tow) she's back in Hi. placing birth announcements in newspapers and convincing the DOH that he was born in Hi.?
And if that is your theory why do you need to see his original BC? Obviously it's not going to prove anything to you. You'll just believe she lied about where he was born way back when.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:53 pm
Like…refusing to acknowledge that the President of the United States was actually born in the United States? In the face of overwhelming evidence? Like that kind of denial?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:53 pm
Like…refusing to acknowledge that the President of the United States was actually born in the United States? In the face of overwhelming evidence? Like that kind of denial?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:54 pm
mystyplx analogous logic: “I will not sign a general armistice because if I did, that would only start another war!”
Produce a copy of the bona fide birth certificate (HI's long form) and the infantilism on both sides dies overnight. Failure to do this (i.e., 'there ain't no such turkey in reality') fans the flames of dissension and solves nothing. The legitimacy of the Zerobama presidency is already in doubt given who, er what, voted for him (the great majority of people in this country who pay no federal taxes. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Failures, in other words.). The least he can do is offer up the birth cirtificate!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
And to answer your question: It's because it's not a good idea for the President of the United States to capitulate to nutjobs throwing tantrums.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
HE HAS ALREADY POSTED IT!!!! The problem is that you wingnuts have decided it's a forgery. There is no satisfying you. Nuff said.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
Hm, that sounds suspiciously like what I said in the first place. My comment was descriptive, not prescriptive.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
Hm, that sounds suspiciously like what I said in the first place. My comment was descriptive, not prescriptive.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
Hm, that sounds suspiciously like what I said in the first place. My comment was descriptive, not prescriptive.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:56 pm
He DID release his birth certificate before the election, goofball. He did have his grandmother fake her own death to cover up his record sealing though.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:58 pm
Let;s see, this time 2 years ago I was gainfully employed, living in a country where I felt safe from terrorist and I didn't worried about leaving my grandchildren in overwelming debt. Your right I guess it was that Saudi huge that help me realize how much better off we are now.Luckily you brilliant folks were able to open my eyes.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:58 pm
You people need medication and an education. Period. Take off the tin foil hats and learn to live with the fact that you have a black President….an a educated one for a change.
Guess Obama's parents did not need to worry that a black man and white woman being married before Obama was born was against the law in many states. Guess they had the foresight to put birth notices in 2 papers 48 years ago…all so they could plan on his being the first black president. To a sane person who holds no racist views? ALL of that makes sense. To those of you lacking in so many ways? Your willing to lie to not have to deal with the facts…those pesky little things LOL Get use to it, NO ONE with a brain bothers to listen to your made up racist endeavors.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:59 pm
Where is the long form birth certificate, and WHO has reviewed it leftie?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 3:59 pm
Jen: You Got it.
The answers posted here that 'he doesn't have to' justifiably feed our speculation that he isnt' a citizen. Which would make him in violation of the law.
What we do know is that Congress is ready to appoint the most biased, racist judge in the history of this nation. Who's really running this country?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:00 pm
The Mother was not old enough to pass on Citizenship to B.H.O.
Sure she was, not that it matters considering he was born in Hawaii, but she was.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:00 pm
If HI produce the short form BC. wouldn't they the state of HI be able to produce the long form BC also. Your problem should be with the state of HI. I am sure if they produce the long form BC you will have a problem with that too.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:01 pm
uuhhh FreetoBme…….2 years ago was right before George Bush crashed the economy through deregulation and turning a blind eye to his friends such as Bernie……sorry but your not allowed to change the dates on who was responsible for the economy. LOL This is why ONLY 20% of the people in this country will not identify as Republican.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
You prove my point. He has produced a bona fide BC. The fact you won't accept that pretty well illustrates that you won't accept anything. You've already got fake experts claiming the BC he's shown is a forgery. They'll just claim the original is a forgery too.
Besides that, this is GOLD for him politically. Fair or not, you birthers create the impression that his political enemies are nutjobs. Why would he want to end that even if producing the vault copy WOULD end it?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
Jeff: We are talking about the 'REAL' birth certificate. The Long BC with his hand/foot print at the time of birth. I have one from 1954. It was a federal requirement. If he is a citizen it exists.
I don't know or care about his grandmother or his motives for a trip to Hawaii. Just produce the document, or I must conclude you are a fake.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
The State of Hawaii does not provide you with a long certificate. Yet, it was posted online for all to see to try to satisfy the Wingnut Nation. But that's not enough – the wingnutteria has deemed it a forgery. Would they prefer him to unilaterally override Hawaii's laws through executive order? Then you'll hear the banshees screaming about what a tyrant he is… Golly Miss Molly! Just face it – he's a thorn in their side and they'd believe anything to realize their fantasy of getting him out of office. So sad.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
The State of Hawaii does not provide you with a long certificate. Yet, it was posted online for all to see to try to satisfy the Wingnut Nation. But that's not enough – the wingnutteria has deemed it a forgery. Would they prefer him to unilaterally override Hawaii's laws through executive order? Then you'll hear the banshees screaming about what a tyrant he is… Golly Miss Molly! Just face it – he's a thorn in their side and they'd believe anything to realize their fantasy of getting him out of office. So sad.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:03 pm
You know, you're so right, Mysty! As Bill Clinton so covincingly artiuclated: “I never had sex with THAT woman!” Good thing we could believe him…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:04 pm
Theory doesn't matter.
Producing the Long Birth Certificate does.
End of Story.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:05 pm
The reason that Obama has not post his long form birth certificate and all necessary supporting documentation, is because he cannot provide what he does not possess!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:05 pm
All this crazy stuff about Obama not being a native born US citizen would simply end if Obama would just produce a physical (not a web image) copy of his certified birth certificate from the State of Hawaii. We all have to produce these documents throughout our live (get a passport, driver's license, professional licenses, etc…). Why he resists this doing this only feeds those who want to keep this bogus story alive. I never understood why Obama, like McCain, just did not produce a physical copy of his birth certificate during the campaign. It only costs about $20.00 to get a certified copy and it would end all this rumor mongering about his alleged “Kenyan birth”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:06 pm
Please please – do not shoot fish in a barrel with anything bigger than a BB gun . I’ve seen it done , and barrels break . Then we’ll have a new republican movement – the bursters . ( I’m still waiting to hear from the after-birthers . )
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:06 pm
All this talk makes me think someone is hiding something. What is Obama hiding? Why doesn't he just release his birth certificate? Makes you wonder, huh?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:08 pm
NO – You have your head wedge up your rear end pal.
The real LONG BC has a foot or hand print.
That would DEfinitively end this controversy.
nah-nah-nah-nah-nah – I'm the president and I don't have to doesn't cut it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:08 pm
Military members are now filing suit saying Obama is not a natural born US citizen, and therefore any orders to deploy to war zones are illegal. They are suceeding in not deploying. Military readiness has been affected. If Obama releases the long form birth certifcate the controversy ends.
The commander in chief has now damaged military readiness. Release the damn long form certifcate or resign, bumbler in chief.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:09 pm
I work in the Mental Health field, and I think you conspiracy theorists better consider getting treated for Paranoia, and quit listening to (pill popping, buying RX drugs illegally, divorced 3 times, advocate of family values and the War on Drugs) Rush, who is the biggest hypocrite in America. I think you all are victims of a family tree that doesn't branch, as are all the radicals.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:10 pm
If you could bottle the crazy in here and pour it in your gas tank, you could drive your car to Mars.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:10 pm
My BC doesn't have a hand/footprint. What makes you think Obama's does? And what difference would it make anyway? If his mother was capable of getting the State to issue him a BC even if he wasn't born in Hi. said BC would have his hand/footprint if Hi certificates do that.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:10 pm
The Birthers believes he was born in Kenya. so what would a long form BC do for them?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
No Liar – they have the LONG BC – he is refusing to produce it or show it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
This is true, and he is doing such a wonderful job of destroying the economy and ruining this country, birth certificate or not. This guy is making Jimmy Carter look like a genius.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:13 pm
Here's an interesting question, just as a thought experiment: Sure, you have your birth certificate in a safe; good for you! Now, are you saying that, regardless of anything else, *you* are therefore more qualified to be the President than the President? If not, then what difference does it make to begin with (leaving aside Constitutional quibbles for the moment)?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:13 pm
Here's an interesting question, just as a thought experiment: Sure, you have your birth certificate in a safe; good for you! Now, are you saying that, regardless of anything else, *you* are therefore more qualified to be the President than the President? If not, then what difference does it make to begin with (leaving aside Constitutional quibbles for the moment)?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:14 pm
Sorry, but yes it does. You can scream and cry and throw all the tantrums you want, but he's already proven his place of birth and the majority (the sane people) are satisfied.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:15 pm
Sweetie, I think George Bush did a crappy job. He's just another selfish big government politician. Although he loved spending he wasn't borrowning and printing money our grandchildren will have to repay. He may have left a deficit but it was chump change compared to Obama's work. Lol I didn't change the date on anything. Ah on last thing, I never said I was republican you just assumed I was because I'm not willing to lay the current mess anywhere but where but where it belongs. It's an OBAMANATION now. Drink some kool aide.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:16 pm
Yes they have the original vault copy. No they don't give it out. What they give out is what you've seen.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:16 pm
I don't know if this is true – But BRAVO.
thank God if it is.
If he is not a citizen – he is a criminal. And then we are in grave danger of a criminal alien running the military.
Produce the D@mned document.
If I were in his position I would go on National TV- The way he does when he is pushing his agenda and show the document and let his opponents have an independed expert validate it and compare the hand or foot print to his own.
This Would End the Controversy 100%.
If raises the legitimate Question – “What is he hiding?”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:16 pm
What is a long birth certificate? I do not have one and have considered myself a citizen all my 58 year life.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:16 pm
What is a long birth certificate? I do not have one and have considered myself a citizen all my 58 year life.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:16 pm
What is a long birth certificate? I do not have one and have considered myself a citizen all my 58 year life.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
I have evidence that Dick Cheney was born in Irag! He wanted to anilhate them, due to an ex-girlfriend that dissed him for Saddam Hussein, who had money and palaces.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
I have evidence that Dick Cheney was born in Irag! He wanted to anilhate them, due to an ex-girlfriend that dissed him for Saddam Hussein, who had money and palaces.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
Wrong, buddy. THE bona fide copy of the birth cirtificate is the long form. You know, the one that names the hospital at which you were born, indicates the signatures of the doctor who delivered you and the state's certificate registrar, among other authenticating info. Obama's abbreviated deal shows NONE of this. Show us the beef!
BTW, here's how we know what Obama has shown thus far was printed ages after his birth. First, his document says his father's race is 'African.' Minus ten points!! “African” is not a race, it's a place. Egyptians are Africans. So are South African's Boers. Neither are black, however. I challenge anyone to find a birth certificate from that era that would show 'African' on it! Analogously, 'Asian 'is not a race (Asia is a place), but “Oriental” is.
Second faux fact on Zerobama's alleged birth certificate: It says mother's race “Caucasian.” That indeed is a race, to be sure, but the word wasn't employed 48 yrs ago. The politically incorrect “white” word was used, however. Oh myyy — how 'insenstive!' of them to use that word back then!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
Wrong, buddy. THE bona fide copy of the birth cirtificate is the long form. You know, the one that names the hospital at which you were born, indicates the signatures of the doctor who delivered you and the state's certificate registrar, among other authenticating info. Obama's abbreviated deal shows NONE of this. Show us the beef!
BTW, here's how we know what Obama has shown thus far was printed ages after his birth. First, his document says his father's race is 'African.' Minus ten points!! “African” is not a race, it's a place. Egyptians are Africans. So are South African's Boers. Neither are black, however. I challenge anyone to find a birth certificate from that era that would show 'African' on it! Analogously, 'Asian 'is not a race (Asia is a place), but “Oriental” is.
Second faux fact on Zerobama's alleged birth certificate: It says mother's race “Caucasian.” That indeed is a race, to be sure, but the word wasn't employed 48 yrs ago. The politically incorrect “white” word was used, however. Oh myyy — how 'insenstive!' of them to use that word back then!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
Wrong, buddy. THE bona fide copy of the birth cirtificate is the long form. You know, the one that names the hospital at which you were born, indicates the signatures of the doctor who delivered you and the state's certificate registrar, among other authenticating info. Obama's abbreviated deal shows NONE of this. Show us the beef!
BTW, here's how we know what Obama has shown thus far was printed ages after his birth. First, his document says his father's race is 'African.' Minus ten points!! “African” is not a race, it's a place. Egyptians are Africans. So are South African's Boers. Neither are black, however. I challenge anyone to find a birth certificate from that era that would show 'African' on it! Analogously, 'Asian 'is not a race (Asia is a place), but “Oriental” is.
Second faux fact on Zerobama's alleged birth certificate: It says mother's race “Caucasian.” That indeed is a race, to be sure, but the word wasn't employed 48 yrs ago. The politically incorrect “white” word was used, however. Oh myyy — how 'insenstive!' of them to use that word back then!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
Wrong, buddy. THE bona fide copy of the birth cirtificate is the long form. You know, the one that names the hospital at which you were born, indicates the signatures of the doctor who delivered you and the state's certificate registrar, among other authenticating info. Obama's abbreviated deal shows NONE of this. Show us the beef!
BTW, here's how we know what Obama has shown thus far was printed ages after his birth. First, his document says his father's race is 'African.' Minus ten points!! “African” is not a race, it's a place. Egyptians are Africans. So are South African's Boers. Neither are black, however. I challenge anyone to find a birth certificate from that era that would show 'African' on it! Analogously, 'Asian 'is not a race (Asia is a place), but “Oriental” is.
Second faux fact on Zerobama's alleged birth certificate: It says mother's race “Caucasian.” That indeed is a race, to be sure, but the word wasn't employed 48 yrs ago. The politically incorrect “white” word was used, however. Oh myyy — how 'insenstive!' of them to use that word back then!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:19 pm
I Don't listen to Rush Limbaugh.
I draw a logical conclusion to a valid question and concern.
You are an idiot.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:20 pm
The kool aide reference exposes you to be a Fox News zombie. So you are probably very fair and balanced in your thinking. Let me guess, you think Bush did a crappy job because he was too liberal?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:20 pm
The kool aide reference exposes you to be a Fox News zombie. So you are probably very fair and balanced in your thinking. Let me guess, you think Bush did a crappy job because he was too liberal?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:21 pm
Ah, it's Bill Clinton's fault. Lies about Weapons of Mass Destruction, 5000 Americans sent to die in Iraq on the back of that lie, an economy in ruins, one Family Values Republican after another caught with his pants down, Ministers in gay porn scandals, Republican bribery and corruption…but Bill Clinton, OMIGOD that was bad bad bad.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:21 pm
If has your foot or handprint and detailed info such as the exact time of date, physician, mother and father's name, etc.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:22 pm
Makes me wonder why there are so many morons who keep insisting he hasn't released his BC.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:23 pm
Do you want Obama to display it to all 300 million Americans personally? You people are nut cakes! Let it die. It has been proven over and over again. Why didn't you demand Bush or Reagan to display actual birth certificates? No wonder this country is going down the tubes! I'll bet half of you are on Welfare, or Social Security, and bash the Government for entitlement programs. A bunch of hypocrites.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:23 pm
Yeah, that's very funny.
Do you have any insight or intelligence to add, or just ignorant insults designed to make you feel like your penis is big enough?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:24 pm
If the President is immune to the same level of accountability the citizens are held to then no one is accountable to any one including the president! What this means is that we as citizens can tell the president and any other authority they have no authority, and law does not pertain to us. I think we can all agree that without accountability there is no responsibility. Mr. Obama needs to be held accountable and show to the citizens that he represents that he is legitimate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:25 pm
lynnmcdaniel, tell me how two years ago, the economy crashed, two years ago the quarterly growth of GDP was positive 3.6%, not negative 6.4% under Obama. Unemployment was 4.7%, not 9.5% under Obama. Which “deregulation” led to the ecomomy crashing? Or was it due to massively understating the risk of FNMA and FRMAC, who invested in bogus mortgages during the time that FNMA was being run by Obama advisor Franklin Raines? And protected by Senator Dodd and Congressman Frank, Chairs of the committees overseeing regulations on these government entities. Or Bernard Madoff, who has made 80% of his donations to Democrats, and never donated one thin dime to President Bush.
There is a thing called the internet, where you can actually chech facts, so next time, keep your nonsense to yourself.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
Do you have any insight or intelligence to add, or just ignorant insults designed to make you feel like your penis is big enough?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
Brain dead conservatives still don't get it. I wellcome anyone who would care to argue that bush isn't a traitor and a murder. Not to mention war criminal. Look it up in the Constitution as well as the U.N. War crimes tribunal. Even morons such as rush can't argue with the truth unless they use propoganda. Which I might add they are second to no one in that form of brainwashing. I was called un-American and a traitor for accusing this corrupt Govt. of war crimes and lying to the American people as well as the world. They must have forgotten what this country was founded upon. I went to war for this country, now I'm ashamed of it and that makes me angry. I demand my country back. Let's begin by prosecuting those in the bush adminnistration for trashing the bill of rights. The punishment for treason is excecution and I for one would like to valunter to be a member of the firing squad. Oop's, I sure hope we still honor something called “Freedom of speech”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
You don't know what the phrase “logical conclusion” even means. He's shown his BC. It's the only kind Hi. gives out. It's been confirmed (repeatedly) by the DOH that actually issues said certificates.
The “logical conclusion” that anyone with more than two braincells would draw from that is that he was born in Hi., just like his BC says.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
You don't know what the phrase “logical conclusion” even means. He's shown his BC. It's the only kind Hi. gives out. It's been confirmed (repeatedly) by the DOH that actually issues said certificates.
The “logical conclusion” that anyone with more than two braincells would draw from that is that he was born in Hi., just like his BC says.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:27 pm
Oh, the REAL one. Even if a so called “long form” was released with those hand/foot prints on it something tells me you would think it was a fake.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:27 pm
Listen, this is very simple. The “long” birth certificate that all the crackpots are demanding does exist, has been seen and verified by the state of Hawaii! It is the stated policy of the state not to release the original copy, but have verified it as authentic and it does exist! THE LONG CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN RELEASED BY HAWAII…IT CANNOT BE RELEASED BY OBAMA, AS THE STATE OF HAWAII KEEPS THOSE RECORDS!!!!!!!! Enough already! get a clue people!!!!!! Really, learn the facts and you might just get a small clue about something for once in your life. What part of the original “long” certificate is held by the state of Hawaii and has been validated and authenticated do you losers not seem to understand!? By the way, John McCain was NOT born in the United States…fact is he was born in Panama! (albeit on US soil)….see the difference between you crackpot “Birther's” and people who live in reality, is that those of us in the real world accept that McCain was born in a US Military installation and therefore, counts as being a US citizen. We also accept that the fact that the original certificate exists and has been fully validated by the state of Hawaii, including the Governor (who is a Republican) and that a fully legal copy has been released, a copy that is valid and is good enough for the state department to issue a passport. How many of you lunatics have their original birth certificate…the “long” version that they are screaming about being produced? Not the fancy one their mommies kept for them with their footprints on them? Please get a clue, this is distracting from the real issues we are all facing and is simply propagated by a lunatic, racist fringe who cannot accept a black man is President of the United States.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:28 pm
Yep wez need to be smart like you. Us unedjukted folks would never think to borrow and print money we don't have so the govern't can keep on spendin. Wez would probably done somethin dumb like decrease goverment spendin, Good thing cuz than how would we keep blamin Bush? Again lucky to have you to point it out. Oh and is this what you meant? -This is why ONLY 20% of the people in this country will not identify as Republican. I think it's probably more than 20% I'm one of them. You just assumed I'm republican cuz I'm not sittin around drinking the kool aide with ya.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:28 pm
All of which you crazy ass birthers would claim are forged if the State of Hawaii were to release the original. There is no reason to give lunatics any credence, as it will only push them to greater heights of insanity.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:28 pm
What is your job in the 'Mental Health field'? Are you a janitor at an MHMR? I know several mental health professionals (yes, with real and direct health care jobs, who would not dream of writing so juvenile a comment, let alone actually posting such tripe. Please let us all know at what instituion you are mopping floors and cleaning toilets. I would not dream of going there for help, or entrusting loved ones into the care of someone so narrow-minded.
Paul M
Sesser, Illinois
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:29 pm
Mike;
These stats lie. Bush was a demon, a Nazi – a retarded psychopath.
It is all irrelevant though.
What is relevant in this discussion is whether this guy is a US Citizen. There are legitimate doubts as it is clear he is hiding something.
It is also clear that the liberal fools who worship him – because they are to stupid to think for themselves – cannot give an answer anything close to respectability.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:29 pm
“What is Obama hiding” is not a legitimate question. If Obama has nothing to hide concerning his b.c, why would he have to fulfill your dumb request?
If a kid challenged me to jump down from my house roof and I did it for him, that would make me as crazy and immature as he is.
Obama will not go down to your level.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:29 pm
While I can agree that conspiracy theorists ought to be treated to a nice healthy heaping of reality, I question the abilities of a practitioner in the mental health field who has such scorn for the very type of people they are supposed to help.
A hijacked plane crashed into the pentagon, two into the world trade centers, and a field. The government should have been able to figure it out, but the right people weren't talking to each other.
Bush wasn't AWOL in the Air National Guard. Forged memos run through a copy machine ten times doesn't make the accurate.
Obama IS the duly-elected PRESIDENT. The government issued his passport before the election based on their own research. The preponderance of evidence in the government's own records is why the lawsuits were all summarily dismissed.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:30 pm
So sorry you morons, but his 'Gammy' says he was born in Kenya. You calling a good black woman a liar?
Paul M
Sesser, Illinois
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:31 pm
Obama is destroying our country with his endless spending.. I hope you idiots that voted for this media fraud are happy..
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:31 pm
Mine doesn't have a hand or footprint. But even if Obama's does, why is it that you need to see his hand/footprint from when he was a baby? All the pertinent information is on the short form, which is based on the original.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:32 pm
The 'proof' by that Russian Lady has been debunked here but the birthers ignore it. Like what they say,”Don't let the facts cloud your imagination”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:32 pm
Are you Stupid:
Obama can make a simple Phone Call to the Gov of Hawaii – or speak to him when he is in D.C. and tell him to release the Document.
If the gov refused – he would be under attack, not Obama.
That document is the only true evidence that would put this legitimate concerna and question of millions of real citizens to rest.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:32 pm
Last I knew, it doesn't matter WHERE you are born if you have a parent who is a U.S. citizen. John McCain was born in Panama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:32 pm
he has. the state has verified it legitimate. doesn't matter, you could hold it in your hand and you wouldn't believe it real. you are being laughed at by most of the world.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:32 pm
he has. the state has verified it legitimate. doesn't matter, you could hold it in your hand and you wouldn't believe it real. you are being laughed at by most of the world.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:35 pm
You people are nuts. If he did produce the “long form” like you all say, you still would say its a forgery. What, is he supposed to mail the original copy to each of you crazies so you can touch it and be satisfied it is real? Please. Here's a question, you know the US State Dept. needs a copy of your birth certificate to issue a passport. Do you think they would have issued him a passport if the BC he submitted was fake? Are you telling me, all you idiots are better “experts” at spotting a fake birth certificate than the State Dept. who does this all the time? Just face it, you are a bunch of racists who can't accept a black president with a foreign-sounding name.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:35 pm
Futhermore – AHOLE – the fact that we can reason and draw logical conclusions doesn't make us racist.
Playing the race card is what liberal jerk-offs do best. Race is not the issue Moron.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:36 pm
So sorry, but she did NOT say that. It was a translated interview over a bad phone connection. Either she or the translator misunderstood the question. She immediately corrected it when she did understand the question. The desperation with which you birthers cling to that one simple mistake in an interview, instantly corrected, is illustrative of the level of insanity here.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:36 pm
Because you obviously love your dear leader, you really must read “his” book Dreams of My Father, where he remembers finding a copy of his bc in a book and how that caused him to reflect on his history and heritage… There is nothing racist about people who respect the Constitution and expect its provisions to be upheld.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
What if he do produce the long form. Then what. Will that be a fake to. What will you come up with next. I think if you don't like him vote him out in 2012. That's the only way you will get him out of office. Cause I am willing to bet that none of this stuff that you guys are talking about in her matters to those politicans. Cause if it did they would of been done something about it so stop your whining and take it like a man.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
Bush?
Who cares about that Retarded Psychopath?
We're talking about whether the president of our nation is even legitimate.
Are you Stupid, or just a liberal?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:38 pm
Where were you with your concerns about the Federal budget and spending when Bush/Cheny were spending $720 millions/day on the unwarranted war in Iraq? And then he cut taxes as a sop to the dumb and dumber on top of hemorraghing money into Iraq!! Millions in U. S. dollars given to milliary and civilian personnel to walk around in Iraq and hand out. No strings attached! No accountability! And then there's the little issue of the prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D? Another giveaway to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of the ignorant and the hysterical! Another instance of no provision to pay for it! Another instance of creative bookkeeping, not evening putting this new benefit into the budget! Talk about irresponsibility and lack of accountability! Let's face it, for a certain kook element in American society, Barack Obama can't do anything that willbe pleasing to them!
Sit down, shut up, and grow up!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:39 pm
Rush whatever his name is used to say all drug addicts should be shot. Since he's a drug addicted felon I demand he be shot. He should lead by example. That is if he wasn't a big mouth coward. I would love to have him call me un-American to my face for being against the wholesale slaughter of innocent civilions and brave American soldiers Unlike him I went to war for this nation, now I'm ashamed of it and that makes me angry. I want my country back
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:39 pm
The only ones making a big deal out of obummer being a 'black' (actually mulatto) president are the liberal fruitcakes. It's not about black, you idiots. It's about legal and illegal, about right and wrong. Everytime you people don't have a leg to stand on you trot out the tired old…'well, you're just racist' routine…you sound like fifth-graders, and asshole fifth-graders at that. All the moron has to do to clear this up, is do what any normal person would do…produce the real BC…not some facsimilize copy on the internet. Have you idiots never heard of 'freedom of information” The American people have a right to know, and we have a right to the real-mccoy-actual documents involved in any dispute. You left-wing nutjobs are only too ready to scream 'freedom of information!' when it comes to one of your pet, idiotic causes, but not so hot for it when the truth might damage your liberal nutjob president. The liberal idiots in this country continue to sicken me to no end.
Paul M
Sesser, Illinois
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:39 pm
He has produced his birth certitificate. Pay attention.
Let's move on to something important like health care.
I have Multiple Sclerosis.
When I get a relapse, my doctor wants me to receive steroid therapy by an iv because steroid therapy by iv reduces the likelihood of relapses. However, my insurance company won't pay for the steroid therapy.
My doctor gives me a blood test to determine if I am developing resistance to my MS therapy. It's a $1,000 blood test. My insurance won't pay for the test though.He ordered it, and we didn't know about the insurance so I had a $1,000 bill.
Others with health issues have even bigger issues. So let's move on from the stupid birth certificate issue, which has already been resolved.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:40 pm
Actually from the politico article I linked, it is not 20%. It would appear to be 13%. But that is not what you said. and I quote….”20% of the Black Voters voted for Obama”. That is just wrong.
In my view, money buys all elections…so that is moot point. That fact is how popular are you to raise that money. He was able to raise that money, which is what winning an election is all about. Thus got in the white house the same way all of them do.
Either way, you are still crazy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:40 pm
It's Based on the Original – which automatically puts it in Doubt.
We need to see and validate the original
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:40 pm
It's Based on the Original – which automatically puts it in Doubt.
We need to see and validate the original
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:40 pm
It's Based on the Original – which automatically puts it in Doubt.
We need to see and validate the original
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:40 pm
It's Based on the Original – which automatically puts it in Doubt.
We need to see and validate the original
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:41 pm
>>Or, are you one of those Caucasians who would voluntarily give their lives for someone who is dfferent from them, as long as they’re not required to give recognition of their equal humanity! <<
Your comment is pathetically humorous, buddy, indeed blatantly absurd, considering Zerobama never registered for the draft (a crime, oh by the way) and refuses to provide documented proof that he ever did. Of course, while (in)gloriously admitting that he was an avid drug user smoking pot 24/7 (among who knows how many other drugs), Zerobama somehow found the time to go to the Post Office and register for the draft. Sure, and Bill Clinton never had sex with THAT woman, too….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:41 pm
I imagine he could probably throw his weight around as President to get the vault copy in spite of Hi.s policies, but why on Earth should he? Just to satisfy a handful of nutjobs who won't believe it anyway?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:41 pm
that's a really stupid reply.
Why won't he release the original if it exists?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:41 pm
that's a really stupid reply.
Why won't he release the original if it exists?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
Mr. McCain was born on a military installation. So it does matter!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
Mr. McCain was born on a military installation. So it does matter!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
Mr. McCain was born on a military installation. So it does matter!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
Mr. McCain was born on a military installation. So it does matter!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
I wish the “birthers” would make up their minds–was Obama born in Kenya, Indonesia, Australia, or Timbuktu! PICK ONE AND STICK WITH IT!!
Or, they could come back to reality and realize that he was born in Hawaii.
But you know, even if he wasn't, his mother was an American citizen–that makes him a “Natural Born American, no matter where he was born!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
I wish the “birthers” would make up their minds–was Obama born in Kenya, Indonesia, Australia, or Timbuktu! PICK ONE AND STICK WITH IT!!
Or, they could come back to reality and realize that he was born in Hawaii.
But you know, even if he wasn't, his mother was an American citizen–that makes him a “Natural Born American, no matter where he was born!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
I wish the “birthers” would make up their minds–was Obama born in Kenya, Indonesia, Australia, or Timbuktu! PICK ONE AND STICK WITH IT!!
Or, they could come back to reality and realize that he was born in Hawaii.
But you know, even if he wasn't, his mother was an American citizen–that makes him a “Natural Born American, no matter where he was born!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
I wish the “birthers” would make up their minds–was Obama born in Kenya, Indonesia, Australia, or Timbuktu! PICK ONE AND STICK WITH IT!!
Or, they could come back to reality and realize that he was born in Hawaii.
But you know, even if he wasn't, his mother was an American citizen–that makes him a “Natural Born American, no matter where he was born!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
All craziness aside (and there's way too much of THAT around this President) why won't he let us see it if it would end all of this? I'm sure he was born in the United States, but that doesn't mean I don't want proof! I honestly think he loves the all the controversy around himself as he does never does anything to stop it! (And when it runs low he spouts his mouth off and creates more!) The words Media and Whore come to mind…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:43 pm
Dave Weigel might be right in this case, but in the past he's lied and misled about this issue. For instance, he claimed on TV that Hawaiian officials said the cert on BHO's site wasn't forged. But, they never said that: Weigel lied.
And, if any HotAir readers want to see how Ed Morrissey and Allahpundit are hurting the GOP at the same time as they refuse to bust the MSM for obvious lies, see this.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:43 pm
He has produced his birth certitificate. Pay attention.
Let's move on to something important like health care.
I have Multiple Sclerosis.
When I get a relapse, my doctor wants me to receive steroid therapy by an iv because steroid therapy by iv reduces the likelihood of relapses. However, my insurance company won't pay for the steroid therapy.
My doctor gives me a blood test to determine if I am developing resistance to my MS therapy. It's a $1,000 blood test. My insurance won't pay for the test though.He ordered it, and we didn't know about the insurance so I had a $1,000 bill.
Others with health issues have even bigger issues. So let's move on from the stupid birth certificate issue, which has already been resolved.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:43 pm
Isn't it funny that this lunatic movement is lead by a crazy lady dares to question POTUS' b.c. Is it legitimate because she has lighter skin that his? Who knows this lady has been plant by Russian to destroy our country? So who's the traitor here, the ones supporting the POTUS or the ones lead by this foreign-accent-speaking lady.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:45 pm
Doctor Roger – it would also be an ad equum attack , would it not ?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:45 pm
yes they would forge it. if the democratic party wanted the socialistic idiot to be in control and the democratic party to be in control in congress. the government has far more control than u.s. citizens realize. if they want it to look like obama was born in hawaii, ” here's your new birth certificate, mr. obama.” for me it's not that he's black, because for everyone accusing people of being racist, he's half WHITE. it's the fact that he is taking america down a socialist path. hmm think we'll collapse like russia in 20 years? something for everyone to think about.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:47 pm
Paul A Don't comment unless you know the facts! In regards to the Constitutuon, and eligability to be president:
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”
* Anyone born inside the United States
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
If you actually READ the constitution, the fact that John McCain was born outside of the US but on a military base of American parents while his father was serving in the military is the point.
Again, this illustrates the difference between people who make sound determinations based on fact instead of opinion and rhetoric.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:47 pm
Paul A Don't comment unless you know the facts! In regards to the Constitutuon, and eligability to be president:
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”
* Anyone born inside the United States
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
If you actually READ the constitution, the fact that John McCain was born outside of the US but on a military base of American parents while his father was serving in the military is the point.
Again, this illustrates the difference between people who make sound determinations based on fact instead of opinion and rhetoric.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:47 pm
the Long BC – the legitimate and valid BC – has NOT been produced.
Pay attention? What rock have you been hiding under?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:49 pm
Who cares where he was born. He's going to go down as the worst president of all time. Even worse than Bush, and all because he thinks that politicians can “solve” the economic crisis that we're undergoing. In actuality, he will make it hundreds of times worse and there will most likely be rioting solely because of these actions.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:49 pm
It's not enough to be an American Citizen at birth, you must be a “Natural Born” citizen of the United States to be President under our Constitution.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:49 pm
Hard to consider a post when someone says socialist. Sorry.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:50 pm
He's shown proof. Crazy people won't accept it. He's shown the only kind of BC Hi. issues. They don't release the original vault copy. No state does. Some states still make photocopies of the original, but more and more are doing it the way Hi. does and using computer printouts.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:51 pm
As an attorney with a very rudimentary understanding of US citizenship law, I must disagree. Given your logic, my father who was born in Los Angeles of a Canadian father and an American mother would have been disqualifed to be president. American citizenship (technically in 1938 there was no formal Canadian citizenship and his father was a British subject), although not being natural born, can be obtained by derviation through the father even with a birth overseas. A baby does not chose his citizenship but under all modern interpretations of the 14th Amendment anyone physically born within the United States (unless on grounds of a foreign embassy) would automatically acquire US citizenship as a natural born citizen on US soil. Of course, given your argument, Obama could have waived his US citizenship at 18 by renouncing it but he never did. I believe the only rational interpretation of the natural born citizenship requirement of the presidency set
forth in the Constitution was a desire by the Founding Fathers to prevent someone born and raised overseas (unless theoretically on US sovereign territory – US military base, US embassy, etc……) from being imported from somewhere else with a different cultural/politcal background to become president. I still think it is a good idea overall even though it does discriminate against some exeptionally well-qualified immigrants from ever seeking that position. But I also support the Electoral College so small states are not completely forgotten in the presidential election process..
I personally believe the real problem here is that Obama is a bit Nixonesque and is very secretive about small details of his life that do not matter. He probably thinks if he produces his birth certificate, like McCain did showing he was born in the Canal Zone at a military hospital, it would be some ”sign of weakness” in answering his critics. For example, he avoids any mention of initial college education at Occidental College here in Los Angeles (just wants to talk about those Ivy League school years), is purposely vague about his religious beliefs, etc…. Obama, in my opinion, has invented himself not from his own past but what he wants his past to be. This allowed him to throw his grandmother (the woman who raised him and gave him a future) under the bus during the campaign when it benefitted him politically. This side of Obama is his great weakness as a leader whatever your political beliefs. Obama has a ridden a bubble of good timing and
having great charm which allowed him to slip into the presidency with very little life experience that would normally qualify one for the job. I just hope this secretive side of Obama as to his personal life does not carry over into his management of government. But, of course, this is one man’s opinion and the election results prove at least as of last year my concerns were those of a minority of the voters.
Robert Bates
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:51 pm
You can repeat that till the cows come home, but it still aint true. The certificate he's shown is legitimate and valid.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:52 pm
I have been hiding under the rock of reality and real problems.
Furthermore, I have never seen my long form. Maybe my birth certificate is fake then. I should ask my dad. Have you seen your long form?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:52 pm
Nice.
Or course, these morons have nothing to offer except opinion and rhetoric. Oh – and of course playing the race card.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:53 pm
If he produced it the easiest mass form of distribution would be to place a copy on the internet, immediately that would be claimed as a forgery by the Birthers. If they have an independent authority review the documents (which as I understand was done with the ones he produced already) than it would be said by the Birthers the authority was biased. The state of HI has already confirmed this information several times as has the State Department, but of course those are government entities so according to the Birthers have to be involved in the cover up already. They could do a public viewing of the document so anyone who wants to visually see it could walk past it, but it would have to be kept securely which means people probably couldn't do much handling of it in order to preserve it so someone in the Birther community would claim the display one was a fake as well. Then, there's the real catch 22 which is they could retroactively produce one now but that would just be a lie regardless of what it said because HI officials could just manufacture the fake at any point just to cover up the conspiracy. Which, leads me to think it is not at all possible to ever lay this to rest. Birthers could always move to another nation and set up their own government according to whatever rules they want, but unfortunately, I doubt they will, they'll continue to bitch for the next 4 to 8 years.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:53 pm
Even worse than Bush? Even worse than the President and the Party that put us in this mess? That lied us into a war? That bankrupted the country on that war? Worse than that? Yeah, right, and 2 + 2 = Tuesday.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:54 pm
his mother was an American citizen–that makes him a “Natural Born American, no matter where he was born!!
Same as John Mc Cain, but he was born on a military base near Panama and many “antibirthers” claim that means he was not a “natural born American”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:55 pm
Poor lunitic libs! We are plying from the same playbook as you idiots and you whine like the little beeotches you are. See the following:
9/11 – Bush Conspiracy WTC detonation – Even when debunced by Popular Mechanics you kept it alive
Bush Nation Guard records – Produced pay stubs and you claimed they were forgeries
McCain not eligable for President because he was not born in the US – He (unlike Obama) produced the long form of his birth certificate proving he was born in the Panama Canal Zone and elegible.
Its funny that I have to produce a BC to go to Mexico, but the DICKtator of the United States is above producing his.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:55 pm
“Natural born” means citizen at birth AKA birthright citizenship. This is as distinguished from “naturalized.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:55 pm
“Natural born” means citizen at birth AKA birthright citizenship. This is as distinguished from “naturalized.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:55 pm
“Natural born” means citizen at birth AKA birthright citizenship. This is as distinguished from “naturalized.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:57 pm
He's my President and I demand proof… In this country the government only has power because WE give it to them, which means we can demand to see whatever we want! It's called democracy. I know you can get copies of your BC because you have to have them to get a state ID and to leave the country (which I'm sure he's done both). Plus you can't tell me that the PRESIDENT of the United States can't demand HI to release a certified copy… it's just simply idiocracy.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:59 pm
[...] Washington Independent bringer en “debunking”, der afslører at denne fødselsattest sandsynligvis er forfalsket fra en ægte attest fra [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:59 pm
Exactly, and well said. Sadly, the birthers don't want to talk about real problems. Not when they can distract us with fake “issues”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:59 pm
No, it's not.
Just produce the original document and this goes away.
What is the rock star hiding?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 4:59 pm
Where did you get your numbers? Fantasy land? There was no surplus in 2001, we were breaking even with a 5 trillion dollar debt. The first and ONLY year that the United States has had a trillion plus deficit is 2209 (this year) President Obama spent this year, more than the Bush Administration did in the entire second term of his Presidency. What new demographics? With revenuse shrinking the way it has been, how do we pay for health care, or social security or education or bailouts, or defense. At the rate the current tax and spenders are going, the economy will be crushed under huge interest inflation caused by this lunacy. Social Security's own leadership said that because of the economy, they start paying out mre than they take in in 2013 and go bankrupt in 2029
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:01 pm
Sorry, but the 911 “truthers” are nutjobs too. I used to think “truthers” were the biggest morons on earth, but you birthers make them look like mental giants by comparison.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:02 pm
Not up to Obama to “prove” your kooky theories. It's up to YOU to prove them. So far then you have, um, forgeries. Oh, yeah, and a lot of yelling. In other words: put up or shut up.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:02 pm
Not up to Obama to “prove” your kooky theories. It's up to YOU to prove them. So far then you have, um, forgeries. Oh, yeah, and a lot of yelling. In other words: put up or shut up.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:04 pm
Since Mombasa is a Muslim area of Kenya or Zanzibar at that time, I really doubt that it would ask for a “Christian Name”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:05 pm
You mean Bush bankrupted us like the $1.6 trillion deficit, that Barry O has us running on? You mean bankrupted like a $787 billion stimulus that has actually increase unumployment and shrunk the economy. At least we won the war in Iraq, Scrotey.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:06 pm
How's this? You show us where that dimwit draft dodger George Bush was during his “missing time” in the military and we'll trade you that for Obama's birth certificate. It's funny, the military has meticulous records on everybody who ever served, where they were and when. But somehow, someway, they just don't seem to have anything, exactly, on this guy…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:06 pm
There are no long form birth certificates for butthole babies. That is the reason some of you have never seen yours.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:07 pm
He's shown proof, you just won't accept it. He HAS shown a CERTIFIED copy. Complete with raised seal and stamp of the registrar, confirmed repeatedly by the Hi. DOH who are the agency that actually issues such certificates.
Talk about idiocracy….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:09 pm
You may have forgotten that your Republican heroes voted all against none for the biggest corporate bailouts in history. But spending on their corporate buddies is OK. Spending on the American people, oh, that's communism.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:09 pm
Most birthers are troothers anyway. Conspiracy theory nutjobs are always looking for teh new crazy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:10 pm
you do know that the definition of “natural born” is not codified anywhere including in the constitution and you are making an assumption as to its legal definition. since there is not a prescient set on the exact legal definition of “natural born” there are continuing competing theories as to how to effectively define it on a national level, including the interpretation of the 14th amendment and how it could relate to the argument. Since different states also hold the definition differently in their law there are even competing definitions on a non-Federal level of how to determine the difference between being a natural born citizen and being a statutory citizen (not naturalized, which implies changing citizenship from one nation to another, but rather is the definition of natural born strictly held to the soil of the continental United States + Alaska and Hawai'i or does it extend to US territorial holdings and military instillation or does it also impact births during travel particularly regarding at sea or by air). There are so many vast gray areas I'm sure the Birthers could exploit the same way that back in the day people went after Chester A. Aurhor. I'm all for challenging the status quo for the sake of the most accurate information but there is, I believe, a distinct difference in motives here.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:10 pm
Keep it up! This is busy work to keep you occupied so the rest of the country can get on with the important business of healing after this disastrous past eight years.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:12 pm
There is no long form in the state of Hawaii that its citizens can request. In HI, when citizens request a birth certificate, a CoLB is their only option–it's the only thing they can get, and it's Hawaii's official, federally approved version of a birth certificate.
Different states do things differently. Just because it's one way in South Dakota doesn't mean it's the same in Hawaii. Remember state governments? Or have conservatives finally stopped caring about states' rights? It's hard to tell. They just on the big government bandwagon everytime a state legislates in a way they don't like. Gay marriage? Forget laws–let's amend the freakin' constitution!
Maybe if you did a little genuine research into how Hawaii's state government and hospitals function instead of listening to AM talk radio you'd have a better grasp on reality. Heck, even the above post about proving McCain's citizenship listed the other definition of citizenship that works even when your father is an alien and you're born outside American soil: the mother simply has to have been an American citizen for at least five years. Guess where Obama's mom was born? Freakin' Kansas.
Move on already.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:16 pm
What an incredibly fact free little statement. And, I'm sorry, we “won” that war? Really? I know that Bush and Cheney's buddies, KBR and Halliburton, sure won the taxpayer rip-off award in Iraq. Come to think of it, all sorts of Republicans made tasty profits off the misery, lies and destruction in Iraq. Maybe that's what you mean by “won”. Like birthers and their forgeries, the “facts” you pimp are false and the facts that can be proven you won't accept.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:17 pm
Well if you can tell me where I can see that at I'll be proven wrong.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:17 pm
Strange!! Obama hadn't seen his Grandmother in years and she was the only living person
who could verify where he was really born, she died a week after his visit. Hmmmm
Obama couldn't get a security clearance to join the army but he can be President
something wrong with that
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:17 pm
actually, he was not born in the Canal Zone, he was born at Colon Hospital in Colon, Panama, which lies outside of the US territorial holdings and recognized as Panama proper. In April 2008 the U.S. Senate approved a non-binding resolution recognizing McCain's status as a natural born citizen, so he basically got a government waiver to define his ambiguous status based on his unique case.
you really should try and do you research better if you want to debunk myths. there's more than enough public record about this one.
then again, you sound like rather than Fact you prefer political Truth. There's a difference, it's a shame more people can't separate their emotions and personal interpretations when trying to present Fact.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:17 pm
I dont care to see any birth papers as it doesnt matter.. he is ineligible because his father was a British subject at the time of Obama's Birth making him of dual allegience meaning he is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN! End of story.. over.. what is going to happen is he IS going to produce a BC that says he was born in Hawaii, and this will all get swept away and the real issue of NATURAL BORN will be no more…The BC issue is being pushed to hide the real problem. I totally believe he was born here.. but he will not ever be a NBC. To be natural born, both parents must be US citizens at the time of the childs birth. There is US Cit, Naturalized Cit and Natural Born…dont get them confused…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:18 pm
You say that. But did Bush get put out of office for any of the things you just wrote know he didn't. So I hope you haven't made yourself believe that Obama will be put out of office just because you think his bc is fake.LLOOLL.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:20 pm
You mean all the camp. promises he’s already broken?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:20 pm
Yes, it is his responsibility. Government by the people, for the people. We have the right to demand proof that he meets the requirements to run OUR country. We also have the responsibility to judge each document fairly and if proven wrong, gracefully accept it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:21 pm
Sabbur, I see that you don’t understand the corruption of politics, so there is no need in engaging any further with you. From your own word, you admitted that voters don’t elect Presidents, but money. And since by your admission, what do you think this unknown Obama was able to gather Six Hundred and Sixty Eight Million Dollars ($668,000,000,.00) except that the anonymous powers selected him because of the great failure of The Bush Regime. They knew that the continuing of the madness of Bush by Senator John (?) would bring rioting in the streets of America. It was not that Obama was popular, but a Nation trying to cloak the mistreatment of a race of people of color for five hundred years. If you send me another message, I will look at that and that will be the end of our communication. GOD Bless You.
Ira L. Lewis
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:21 pm
there is precedent on this and you are incorrect, see Chester A Arthor 21st president of the US, who's father was Irish… blows your theory right out of the water.
and if you see my note below you'll understand better that there is not a pre-defined Federal level legal definition of Natural Born so you are making assumptions based on a theorized dictionary definition that both parents must be US citizens at the time of birth
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:21 pm
Socialism is when the government owns or controls the means of production, right? And right now, doesn't our government own or control the major banks and two of the “big three” automakers? And isn't the government poised to take control of health care, which is fully one fifth of the economy? This is, by definitition, socialism, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the race of the person pushing the program.
I mean, look at the numbers from the last election – Whites voted for and against Obama at the same rate they voted for and against Al Gore and John Kerry in the previous elections. Blacks, on the other hand, voted for Obama by over 30 percentage points more than they voted for Kerry and Gore. Did their politics change that dramatically? Or did they vote based on race? You decide.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:24 pm
Man how can you say we won the war in Iraq. We went to war on a lie. Then another lie was told then another lie was told. It was three different lies to the reason that we went to war in Iraq. So how can war on lies be won. Please explain that to me.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:29 pm
I dont care to see any birth papers as it doesnt matter.. he is ineligible because his father was a British subject at the time of Obama's Birth making him of dual allegience meaning he is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!
Wrong. And stupid. Here's a list of presidents with one non-citizen parent:
Thomas Jefferson
Andrew Jackson
James Buchanan
Chester A. Arthur
Woodrow Wilson
Herbert Hoover
Barack Obama
See, that's how stupid you are.
End of story.. over.. what is going to happen is he IS going to produce a BC that says he was born in Hawaii, and this will all get swept away and the real issue of NATURAL BORN will be no more…The BC issue is being pushed to hide the real problem.
The birthers are part of the conspiracy! They're just trying to distract us all from the real issue! Wow, the crazy just gets crazier.
To be natural born, both parents must be US citizens at the time of the childs birth. There is US Cit, Naturalized Cit and Natural Born…dont get them confused…
You have them confused. Don't feel bad about it, you're insane and rather dim. There are actually two types: natural-born and naturalized. They are both U.S. citizens.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:29 pm
From every point of view of this who BC thing, has really no strong evidence to prove that he -isn't- a citizen. There are no strong facts to claim, no hard evidence that even suggests it. Now, this is the real kicker for me: Why would the US Government, our Government be as incompetent as to not investigate any persons background for any federal position within any administration? The answer is: The have.
To even apply for any position within our federal government, you do have to supply your birth certificate, go through exhaustive background checks, physicals, and the alike, and to say that he deviously deceived all law enforcement officals, from every level. Is not only an insult to them as professionals, but to our government. Have you no faith in how we handle things?
So what about his drivers license? Last time I checked you needed to have a birth certificate for that. College Aid? Senatorial Runs? Are you people incompetent? Are you implying at -every- tier of government he was a part of, he magically eluded any form of investigation into his background?
Oh I get it, because he has a foreign name, and he looks black, all of a sudden he has to prove to you that he's a citizen. Ingenious. Really. You guys just keep digging your party deeper and deeper in a hole. At this rate, the Democrats can pass anything, and all you still are ranting about his Long Form BC.
Ingenious Really. You will doom your conservative movement for days to come. When you're old, retired, and about to pass on, when the youth look upon this, know that -you- ruined your only chance to redeem any semblance of power in the country.
The more and more you guys go about it, the more and more that future voters look upon this and say: You are crazy.
Good job in handing the liberals this country wingnuts.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:29 pm
you are a disgusting piece of shit for suggesting what you just did.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:30 pm
There is definition regarding dual allegience.. his father was a british subject and his mother was not here long enough to pass her citizenship to him .. so he is not natual born. as for Chester A.. It doesnt change the facts of NOW. So it slipped in.. oh wait.. so did this one.. it doesnt matter.. nothing short of a 2million person march to DC will be needed to make any change.. the hill doesnt care.. and they do whatever THEY want and not what WE want..
This country has been broke for a long time.. before bush..before clinton.. Oh well..I guess I will continue to cling to my guns and god..
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:32 pm
Oh NOES!1! Teh scawwy Muslin prezunit TeLePromTuRZ is comin' for mah bukkit!!1!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:34 pm
The right had their way for 8 long years, our country was run into the ground. Now we have a man that was elected by majority vote, that's correct the right lost, wheather you like it or not Obama is our president, our leader, the most powerful man in the world, brought into power by a democratic voting system that worked far better than in 2000. Deal with it, in less than 4 years you will have your chance again to get one of your beloved right wingers in power again, then all of you paranoid dillusionists can reign supreme again and ruin this country far more with your hatred, paranoia, guns, religious fanaticism and general fear of anything you don't fully understand. I am not a democrat but when you only have 2 choices for prez this is what happens. I can't imagine how the angry troll and his non-sensical mistress would've been doing right about now, probably more of the conservative right winger same. How boring!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:35 pm
I see these type of people everywhere on the net. They don't have to prove anything they say with facts, so they lie through their teeth to promote their rant du jour. I'm sick to death of them, and assume most are too. Obama was never denied clearance for the armed forces, and it doesn't matter what type of citizen his father was: He was born in the U.S., and his mother is also a U.S. citizen. Splice together all the misinformation you want, you really can't change what is true.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:36 pm
The deficit was 1.3 trillion when Bush left office. If Obama leaves us with 1.6, it will be a fraction of the deficit increase Bush saddled us with:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/10/business/econ…
According to the IMF and several economists, The stimulus has been partly responsible for the good economic news we've seen over the last few weeks:
“Obama's stimulus package of tax cuts and increased government spending provided some support to the economy in the second quarter. But it will have more impact in the second half of this year as it extends its reach, economists said.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090731/ap_on_bi_ge…
Even John McCain admits that Obama's economic policies are working in the short term:
“”I think you could say that it is a short-term improvement in the economy. And I'll be glad to give him credit for that.”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/25699…
Making up facts isn't working for the birthers, and it won't work for you.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:38 pm
Bush bankrupted us by nearly $800 billion thanks to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. At least Obama's helping American's with his plans, all Bush did was line the pockets of his oil industry pals. And TARP was approved before the Obama even got into office, so that's still on Bush's watch.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:38 pm
his father was a british subject and his mother was not here long enough to pass her citizenship to him
Yes, she was.
so he is not natual born.
Yes, he is.
as for Chester A.. It doesnt change the facts of NOW.
No, it just illustrates how idiotic your argument is. Oh, by the way, here's the full list of presidents with one or more foreign parents:
Thomas Jefferson
Andrew Jackson
James Buchanan
Chester A. Arthur
Woodrow Wilson
Herbert Hoover
Barack Obama
Do you think no one in the history of the United States ever thought about that?
Oh well..I guess I will continue to cling to my guns and god..
Don't forget your paranoid delusions! You sure are clinging to those real good.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:38 pm
Maybe I wasn't clear…my point was that under the law they BOTH are American citizens, not that I questioned McCain's citizenship. And I appreciate the posting of the actual law…I admit I didn't know the exact requirements.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:41 pm
We’ve long since stopped “communicating” (if it was ever there). On a separate note:
from http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5690
“And anyway, why do we say “God bless you”? Remember, “God, bless you.” It’s like saying, “Fred, drive you to the store.” That means Fred’s driving himself. So when we say “God bless you” we’re saying “God, bless your own self.” But we don’t want the blessing to go to God; supposedly, we want it to go to the person we’re talking to. ”
……..
“Did you ever notice how sometimes we say weird things like that? The other day a friend was riding with me in the car and we were trying to find a place for gas, but the gas stations all had long lines, and so she said, “Waiting room only.” And I thought, “What was that ? Waiting room only.” I guess she meant the auto equivalent to “standing room only” but cars don’t stand, they wait in line. But when you say “waiting room only” for cars it doesn’t mean the same thing as “standing room only for people.” Does it? “Standing room only” means there’s only room left for those who will stand? So “waiting room only” means there’s only room left for those who wait . But there wasn’t any room left for those who wait; there wasn’t any waiting room at all. Everything was full. So she said “waiting room only” but she really meant ” no waiting room only.” Weird. Why do we talk like that? We do the same thing when we say “God bless you.”
So we say “God bless you” when we really mean “God bless them.” But we can’t say “God bless them” when we’re actually talking to them, because then we sound schizoid. Like place your hand on someone’s head, raise your eyes to heaven and say, “God bless him.” Like Thomas supposedly did in John 20. He said, “My Lord, and my God.” He’s not talking to Jesus, he’s talking to God up in heaven. That’s weird. Nobody talks that way. So we should say, “God, bless him or her ” if we really wanted to bless someone. But then we’re not talking to them, we’re talking to God.
”
……
“That’s why we simply say things like “God bless you” because we don’t we sound looney when we do. Why don’t we sound looney? Because we don’t mean it. We’re not really invoking a blessing. We’re not saying anything at all. We’re making nice Christian noise….and we’re using God’s name in a vain and empty fashion. That’s the way it seems to me.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:44 pm
Digging their own graves. Just digging it deeper and deeper. Just like the children of Israel, there will be much wandering in the wilderness for 40 years. Perhaps after that time, do you see the follies of their ways, and attack policies, not birth certificates. If this is the only thing you have to bring down this guy, then.. well… good luck. Haha.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:44 pm
No matter what, we will have a bogus President due to our ineffective voting rights, along with a lack of representation in this lobbyist infected government.
I copied the following to make the point, just show us your real Birth certificate. That problem will go away. Next, answer the Barry Soetorro alien student question and if you mentioned Barry Soetorro on your bar exam.
Anonymous says:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI…
What Obama and my wife have in common
Posted: August 03, 2009
1:00 am Eastern
© 2009
Dear Mr. President:
First, happy birthday. I do hope Aug. 4 is an enjoyable day for you and your family. Coincidentally, I also will be celebrating this week the birth of someone dear to me, my beloved wife, Gena, whose birthday is on Aug. 9.
Speaking of birthdays, I couldn't help but hear and read all over the news last week about the fresh attention to your constitutional eligibility and natural born citizen status. I can hardly believe that individuals are now offering bounty – one for $100,000 – for any personal witness or sufficient evidence to your American birth.
For nearly two years, this debate continues to grow despite all your administration's attempts to diffuse it. And those who are raising concerns aren't just those on the right, but moderate law-abiding citizens like a retired CIA officer who commissioned an investigator to look into the issue.
Still, your press secretary, Robert Gibbs, continues to glibly brush aside the issue by calling it “fictional nonsense.” But, in so doing, he devalues the grievance passage of the First Amendment and insults those who are genuinely concerned and inquisitive by categorizing them all as political quacks. He needs to learn that you can't model tolerance for certain minorities while belittling and quarantining those who don't blindly follow your lead.
Believe it or not, I'm not writing you to challenge whether you were born in America, though I see nothing wrong with the American public voicing that constitutionally based grievance with someone in your esteemed position. As one blogger wrote, after all, “We aren't talking about a 12-year-old qualifying to play Little League here.” Or as Ronald Reagan once said, “Trust but verify.”
Personally, I must admit that I find it a bit of a groundless stretch not to believe in the birth announcements in two major Hawaiian newspapers in August of 1961, in which the Hawaiian Health Department would have been required to post information they received directly from hospitals: “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4.” Nevertheless, that proof still doesn't answer why you refuse to reveal your original birth certificate and end the growing tides of controversy.
I'm writing you because this is no longer a matter merely about proving a presidential prerequisite in the Constitution. Refusing to post a copy of your original birth certificate is an unwise political and leadership decision that is enabling the birther controversy. The nation you are called to lead is experiencing a growing swell of conspirators who are convinced that you are covering up something. So why not just prove them wrong and shut them up?
(Column continues below)
If the birther movement is truly full of a bunch of conspiracy-fringed kooks or “zombies,” as the Los Angeles Times proclaims, then prove once and for all that you are a naturally born citizen by posting your original birth certificate. And all the controversy will fade away like the pains of childbirth.
I agree with CNN's Lou Dobbs, who was chastised by his own media outlet for demanding the release of your original birth certificate. So why is that such a bad request? We certainly know why CNN/U.S. President Jon Klein thought it was a bad idea: because he previously declared that CNN researchers determined that Obama's 1961 birth certificate no longer existed.
But Hawaii's officials confirmed again last week that they indeed have your original birth certificate on file. Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaiian State Department of Health, repeated her October 2008 statement that she had personally seen with her own eyes the “original vital records.”
Some claim that even you cannot see or request your own personal birth certificate, because Hawai'i's disclosure law (Hawai'i Revised Statutes 338-18) states that “it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part on any such record … “
But the law further states that the Health Department “shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record.” (Italics mine)
Isn't categorically satisfying constitutional requirements for a president, or answering the First Amendment grievances of hundreds of thousands of Americans, or ending a national debate or healing a country's divisions enough “direct and tangible interest”?
Mr. President, as more and more people realize that you are refusing to release your original birth certificate, further questions will fuel the fires of debate or at least hinder the embers from ever being snuffed out. Questions like, “Does it really contain the Hawaiian physician's name?” Or “Does it disclose something other than his birth place that he wishes others not to see?”
In fact, last week copies of the 1961 birth certificates from twin girls, who were born a day after you in the same Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital, give examples of those typical of the time. They include much more information than certificates today, like the baby's parents' ages, occupations, birthplaces, race, etc., as well as specifics of the medical personnel presiding over the baby's birth and the hospital in which he or she was born.
Of course not every U.S. citizen has access to their original birth certificate, but you do, and that's the only one under debate. As valuable as copies can be, textual critics know that nothing outweighs an original, especially when only it contains the information under question.
So again I ask, why don't you simply request, release and give permission to make public your original birth certificate?
Mr. President, you promised the American people that you are “committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government.” In fact, on July 23 in your prime time press conference, you said that your administration was more transparent than those of previous presidencies: “I think that we have provided much greater transparency than existed prior to our administration coming in.”
So again I ask, why not live out that transparency promise by posting your original birth certificate and end the division and debate?
Well, I have a birthday to plan, so I better get going.
Again, happy birthday Mr. President.
Yours truly,
Chuck Norris
Posted On: Monday, Aug. 3 2009 @ 6:46AM
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:45 pm
Natural born? Doesn't that mean naturally birthed? Let me further confuse the conversation by proposing that only those born without use of medications by the mother, and heavens! no episiotomies! should qualify as natural born. I know my kids were!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:45 pm
I had to go get my birth certificate from the state of Oregon yesterday – cost me $20 bucks and it was a lousy forgery COLB. I asked the lady for my long form BC – she looked at me like I was crazy and said this is the only form that was available. I can't believe the state of Oregon would just hand out forgerys like this. Why didn't my parents tell me I was born in Kenya??
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:47 pm
I would rather be compared to the Chosen people of God, than the devils children such as yourself.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:48 pm
You need to learn how to read much better because you are confusing your opinion with legal fact. you are misreading the definition of natural born as how you chose to define it which says nothing about both parents having to be American citizens at the time of birth because no such law exists anywhere in the Federal government to define Natural Born.
second of all, the mother comment is completely incorrect as well, or do you suppose that her birth in Witicha KS was faked too and that her parents who were also born in Kansas weren't legit either.
It never ceases to amaze me how little Fact people need to know to form an opinion they feel is some kind of unfallable truth.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:50 pm
It's funny that you assert that people who are simply asking Obama to provide proof that he is a natural born citizen, a Constitutional requirement for the Presidency, don't have to prove anything.
The burden of proof is not on us. It is on President Obama. He has yet to prove that he is, in fact, a natural born citizen (see your Constitution). The Certificate of Live Birth that has been floated as evidence of his claim is not proof. In short, it can be obtained by or for someone who is not a natural born U.S. citizen.
The burden of proof rests exclusively on Obama. He could end all this by simply providing the necessary evidence. My guess is that he is more than happy to have this controversy taking up some of the time which could otherwise be devoted to understanding and then defeating his Marxist plans.
Obama clearly expresses his contempt for both the rule of law and his fellow citizens every day that he refuses to provide bona-fide evidence of his eligibility to serve as President.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:52 pm
This little clause here takes care of most of your arguement..
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. ”
The grandfather provision of the “natural born Citizen” clause provides an exception to the “natural born” requirement for those persons who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, but had been born as British subjects before the American Revolution (or were born after the Revolution, but before 1787). Without this exception, ten subsequent presidents would have been constitutionally ineligible to serve.[1]
Additionally, the Twelfth Amendment states that: “[N]o person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
All of those listed are covered under that clause except Maybe Chester..and for sure obama..but again.. it doesnt matter.. what they want, they get.
Also, in the future, just because I have a different point of view or interpretation than you do doesnt mean you need to resort insults and sarcasm. This should be a friendly debate.
thank you
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:52 pm
You're pathetic. You are so utterly pathetic, it makes me wretch. Stop.. Just stop doing what you're doing.
Breathe. Reverse course.
What is your -purpose- of bringing the Natural Born Citizerny into question. You don't think the FBI hasn't investigated -their own president- Do you not think, that any law enforcement official has not said. “Well, he's not eligible.” After seeing that he wasn't?
What about the Government of Hawai'i who had -come- out in a press conference twice.
Twice. And declared he is a citizen of the country.
And then the 378-0 Resolution voted by members of Congress, who confirmed his citizenship.
Maybe I'm beginning to think. He's either that good, or you're just that dim. Either way, he seems far above the fray. Good Job. Keep digging. I'm sure one day, you'll find the real killer of JFK, and the Aliens that are hidden in area 51, and the Illuminati and the Bilderbergers who manipulate you, and everything else.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:52 pm
Ms Taitz is introducing her copy of the birth certificate in court , so I doubt that it is a fraudulent
copy. She surely wouldn't want to look a fool in such a high profile case !
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:52 pm
Well, if Chuck Norris is on board, then so am I. He'll roundhouse kick that usurper in the face!!!!1!!
Seriously, birthers? Chuck Norris? It's hard to parody you when you do it yourselves.
Btw, I loved this:
I copied the following to make the point, just show us your real Birth certificate. That problem will go away. Next, answer the Barry Soetorro alien student question and if you mentioned Barry Soetorro on your bar exam.
Yeah, the problem will go away. But our chest of conspiracy theories is bottomless! We have more questions! We will never be appeased by the martian kenyan socialist fascist alien usurper!!!!1!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
Ever see the Twilight Zone episode, “Monsters Are Due on Maple Street”? It's the episode where there are lights and electrical power flickering on and off with no reason, and people in the neighborhood start to get paranoid and suspect that there is someone or something behind it and it's out to get them. Then one house doesn't lose power at all, and everyone gangs up on that family, believing them to somehow be behind it all. Eventually the neighborhood turns to physically fighting and trying to kill each other. The camera cuts away to show two aliens sitting on a hill watching it, and one points out how easy it is to get earthlings to destroy themselves, merely by messing with the power, and they speculate that taking over the earth will be easier than they ever imagined.
Well, I don't know if something like that is what's behind the President not releasing his alleged “long form” birth certificate (which I don't even know if Hawaii has), but as a Democrat, I think it's pretty funny watching you tin foil hat types destroying the reputation of your party by going to war over this. Hahahaha! Good luck getting any rational folks to vote along with you in 2010 or 2012! Go birthers, go birthers, go birthers!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:00 pm
Prove to me that Chuck Norris wrote this!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:01 pm
Maybe the forgery was concocted by Obama's camp as a sort of red herring to lead his persecutors astray. Whatever the forger is, he/she isn't a true sceptic or “birther”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:02 pm
You seem to be very versed in this.. its funny how each side sees what they want to see..and how they want to see it.. all seriousness aside..I still believe what I want based on how I interpret something..and you will still believe yours.. fair enough.. in the end will it really matter..they like this squabbling among the peasants.. ! Have a grand day!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:02 pm
All of those listed are covered under that clause except Maybe Chester.
Really? Are you suggesting that James Buchanan, who was born in Pennsylvania in 1791, is covered by a provision meant to cover those who were foreign citizens before the country was founded? Or that Woodrow Wilson, born in Virginia in 1856, was somehow a citizen of another country prior to 1789? Or Herbert Hoover, who was born in Iowa in 1874? You obviously have no clue what you're talking about.
but again.. it doesnt matter.. what they want, they get.
Oh, it doesn't matter? Then what's is the point?
Also, in the future, just because I have a different point of view or interpretation than you do doesnt mean you need to resort insults and sarcasm.
I call em as I see em. If you don't like it, maybe the internets aren't for you, bucko.
This should be a friendly debate.
Friendly debate with deranged wackos is an impossibility.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:04 pm
Actually a person can't be President if he isn't a natural born U.S. citizen, but Obama already is President. A priori, he is a natural born U.S. citizen. He proved it before he ran and was allowed to run. Now, if you think he isn't a natural born citizen, the burden is on you krazies to prove THAT.
And then after that, try to get jobs so you don't waste so much time on this.
Still laughing….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:06 pm
Um, it has been proven. People keep asking in the face of that proof … which is downright weird.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:06 pm
I just find it funny, most of the base here, will go to any length to prove themselves right. Saviours of the country.
How quaint.
Well, I propose this. After you spend as much time as you do unveiling this large convoluted plot to gain hold of the highest office in the land, and it proves to be invalid. You would've spent all the time, and energy, and patience, diffusing that situation, instead of focusing on Cap and Trade, or Health Care.
I'm bloody glad I have you. Bloody glad, indeed.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:07 pm
What percentage of the means of production in this country do you think the government owns–40%? 50%? 75%.
Would it surprise you to find out that even with owning or controlling the major banks (which it doesn't, but I'll give you that) and two of the three major automakers (which it doesn't–it owns part of one; Fiat owns another; shareholders own Ford), that the government “owns or controls” under 0.24% of the means of production in this country?
The Saudis actually own or control more of our production than the US government does. So much for socialism.
Still laughing….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:08 pm
What is the point of this post. It has nothing to do with the fact the crazies on the Right are saying that the President was not born in the United States. Just so that you know, there are banks that go under all the time. There were a number that went under during the Bush Administration, was that a sign that Bush is a socialist? What you should be outraged by is that fact that during the Bush Adm. credit swaps, bad subprime loans, and Ponzi scheme were allow to go on all while our then President and his administration told us that the fundimental of the economy were strong. Now, with that being said, should we be saying that capitalism is the devil. No, just the greed people running the capitalistic system. As far as your little statement about blacks voting for Obama based on race, I believe that your numbers are faulty. I believe that more blacks just actually got out an voted during this election. But the fact remains, the Republican Party has never been a party that wanted the black vote anyway but now they want to cry racism. Such a joke. Ignoring us just came back to bite them in the butt.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:09 pm
I see the anti-birthers are getting more hysterical by the hour.
What's it like to be “True Believers” who take on faith alone what has not been proven?
Why are you all so collectively UNcurious about how much of his life Barry Obama is hiding from the public?
All this fuss caused over a simple unanswered question:
Where's the Birth Certificate?
You know, I thought this was all a non-issue at first, but the longer it goes on that more I see the True Believers go batschit crazy and the more I see state/media collusion to quash the story, the more I think there's some “there” there.
Barry's hiding something, and I want to know what it is.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:09 pm
Hey moron, answer Mantis's reply. Oh, there is no answer to it? Then make up some more crap.
Laughing at you, not with you….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:13 pm
It's incurious, not UNcurious.
But that's not why we're all laughing AT you.
Hahahahaha!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:14 pm
His parents had become US cits.. therefore children are Natural Born Cits..
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
@Atlas_Collins:
Is that your real name or are you a commie spy? Pls put up a picture of your birth certificate or I'll assume you've something to hide. Because I'm a paranoid douchebag, too!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
What's it like to be “True Believers” who take on faith alone what has not been proven?
What's it like to be a deluded paranoiac?
Why are you all so collectively UNcurious about how much of his life Barry Obama is hiding from the public?
We know lots about the president. I don't personally need to know the name of the doctor that delivered him in Honolulu, or what grades he got in school. I've never known those things about any presidential candidate when voting, so why would I need them now?
Where's the Birth Certificate?
There's an original in the Hawaii state archives. There's a certified copy that the Obama campaign released in 2008, and presumably still has. What's the problem?
You know, I thought this was all a non-issue at first, but the longer it goes on that more I see the True Believers go batschit crazy and the more I see state/media collusion to quash the story, the more I think there's some “there” there.
Translation: the more crazy I consume, the more crazy I become. Black helicopters everywhere!!!!1!!
Barry's hiding something, and I want to know what it is.
Maybe it's your brain?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
Ok Obama! Lets show those Repubs a thing or two and shut them up!! Just show your COLB and put an end to it!! That will show them who's boss!! Not to mention saving yourself tons of money hiring lawyers to fight it. There were congressional hearings on Mcains birth. Show them you don't need no stinking hearing to prove where you were born!! OOPS!! You can't? You won't? You weren't? Oh, never mind!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:17 pm
Wrong. THe burden of proof in NOT on Obama. The powers that be checked, verified and deemed as acceptable his elegibility so serve as President. Now some people who really wanted the other guy to be President are crying foul. Please tell me where in the consitution that the President has to show the general populace his eligibility? You right wing wackos were perfectly complacent letting Bush II run roughshod all over the constitution, but when even republican senators who you probably voted for have laid this non-issue to rest and perfectly satisfactory evidence debuking your stupid conspiracy theory has been presented by government officials, you refuse to acknowledge the plain and simple truth that is right in front of your eyes. Get over yourselves. The burden of proof is upon the one who makes the accusation. That's the way our society works.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:18 pm
Blacks have ALWAYS voted for WHITE presidents — they had no other choice. Blacks usually voted democratic, so that didn't change either. What's the point??
You see, you're twisted. You started your conversation saying, “…it has absolutely nothing to do with the race of the person pshing the program.” Then, you give statistics regarding, “Blacks, on the other hand voited for Obama by over 30 percentage points…”
Once again, what's your racist point???
“
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:19 pm
I don't have the original copy of my birth certificate either. So does that mean I wasn't born in the United States as well?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:23 pm
Only if you are African American and your politics are to the left of Hannity/Rush/Beck and you get elected president.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:24 pm
Why would he do that? Then you guys would (in theory, at least) have to stop making asses of yourselves. Oh, the insane among you would still do so, but those on the margin would stop. It's too much fun watching the Republican Party self-destruct.
Still laughing!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:24 pm
I got a copy of mine because I couldn't afford to pay over $900,000 to fight showing it! Must be nice to have that much noney to waste! Cheaper to just get it!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:26 pm
No you didn't. You're lying. The one you are claiming is yours is a fake. Seriously. Show us the real one. Or else be prepared to be deported to wherever it is we say you were really born. Seriously.
Douchebag.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:26 pm
I just realized something. If you look at the copy of what is supposed to be Obama's Kenyan birth certificate it says under the seal republic of Kenya and the cert. is dated Aug. 1961.
Kenya was a british colony at this time and di not become the Republic of Kenya until 1963 , Dec 12 1963 to be precise so no way this could be authentic from the 'republic of Kenya ” of be dated form 1961.
But alas the birthers will keep it going anyway
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:27 pm
No, she wouldn't want to look like a fool. Nobody who has ever seen her and heard her speak would ever think she was a fool. LOL
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:29 pm
Once again, all I get is ad hominum attacks and accusations that I am the one who is crazy for asking a simple question that has NOT been answered:
Where is the Birth Certificate?
Why does that question get you so wound up? Why do YOU think Barry refuses to release the original? (And what the Obama campaign released is NOT a copy of the original — but you already know that, don't you?)
As for his grades — didn't we hear about Gearge Bush's C-average for 8 years? Didn't we lampoon John Kerry's F's? Didn't we make endless fun of Sarah Palin's community college education?
ALL Presidents in recent memory have released far more of their life records than Obama has.
WHY is he hiding so much of his life?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:30 pm
If it were me and I had the proof I was an American citizen I'd show it so it proved 1 of the essential requirements for being the President of the United States then I could go on with the business I was elected to do and try to fix this country, OOOHH, can't do that either?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:31 pm
Oh, thank you I certainly intend to have a grand day.
There's no “side” in my statements, simple a string of easily verifiable facts. Based on a series of facts and only of facts, it become plainly apparent two things 1) there is no formalized legal definition of “natural born” and 2) based on the only available definitions of statutory citizenship (as opposed to naturalized) Obama is a citizen based on the criteria provided and the information publicly available about Obama.
From there one can derive based on these two facts Obama is eligible.
IF however, which it appears some do, you believe the information made available publicly about Obama is incorrect than you could possibly surmise a potential ineligibility.
However, a great number of the theories that are floated around as to why he cannot be President based on legal definition miss-read how the legal definitions are actually structured, for example, the citizenship status of parents.
The ones that believe the BC that was produced is fake and that the rest of the birth related announcements and verifying factors were made up, well, those are opinion. I chose to believe they are real based on the information I have available. Someone else chooses to believe they are fake. Maybe I chose to believe there's is fake too and I should have them deported? Maybe I shouldn't.
The problem with the fake BC versus real BC is this – there is no such thing at this point of undeniable proof. No mater what course of action Obama would take it would result in some new form of the conspiracy morphing to disprove it. Since it is physically impossible for every last American to be trained in how to spot a fraud and then personally inspect the document and time machine's do not exist to go back and witness the birth itself there can be no end to the conspiracy theory.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Isn't Chuck Norris the washed up Hollywood actor who campaigned for the religious goofball who now has a show on Fox (Huckleberry, or Dingleberry, or Huckabee, something like that) who doesn't believe in evolution?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:33 pm
Even if Obama shows us his COLB (long form) birth certificate there are going to be Birthers claiming it will be a fake. BTW, I don't recall hearing anything about McCain's birth being brought up in Congressional hearings. It was brought up in the media that McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone at the time it was an American territory, but that both his parents being American made it a moot issue.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:33 pm
He did that before he got elected. He wouldn't have been on the ballot had he not. Moron.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:33 pm
Chuck Norris, I've always enjoyed your acting in Texas Ranger. But now you're revealing a facet of your character that is very unpalatable. The Governor of Hawaii, Hawaii's official vita statistics bureau, as well as President Obama himself, have all provided ample proof that Obama is a natural born American citizen. Would you bring similar accusations against Sen. John McCain, for having been born on a military base outside of the continental United States of America? I don't think so. You've aligned yourself with the right wing kooks who just won't admit to themselves that they are scared shitless because an African American has been elected POTUS. If the fears and anxieties of these people had been addressed and debunked way back in the days of George Wallace, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan (who went south to Philadelphia, Mississippi, where the creeks and streams are littered with the bodies of lynched African Americans, to announce his presidency and thereby cater to the fears and hysteria of these fringe element zealots, then the country would now be very much more mature politically and culturally and therefore not find it so difficult to accept the fact of Barack H. Obama as President of the United States of America. What's different in 2009 is that there are more Caucasians who are not so fearful and who are standing up to make themselves heard and to denounce the kooks for just what they are–right wing nut cases!
Think about it! Or, are you one of those Caucasians who would voluntarily give their lives for someone who is dfferent from them, as long as they're not required to give recognition of their equal humanity! Sorry, the Constitution was changed. African Americans are no longer to be considered nonhuman, property; we now are Constitutionally human beings, full-fledged, first class citizens and thereby entitled to the same liberties as Caucasian Americans!
Think about it. Recognizing the equal humanity of all does not diminish your humanity one bit!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:33 pm
I keep hearing about all this money Obama supposedly has spent to fight showing his birth certificate. Documentation, please.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:34 pm
Wow – the made up $800K figure it now $900K? I must have missed the memo.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:34 pm
Hi madelyn,
If I was President, or even a candidate, of course I would release any records that the public demanded.
What gets me about this whole situation is that Obumble could defuse it in about a minute and a half and make the “birthers” look as ridiculous as the leftie loon “911 truthers”.
But he doesn't. Why do you think Barry keeps his birth records, school records, medical records, passport records, adoptions records, etc ad infinitum, ALL sealed? And why, do you think, has he spent over a million dollars in legal fees keeping them sealed?
I'm not speculating as to what Obumble might be hiding, I'm just pointing out the factual evidence that he is, obviously, hiding something.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:36 pm
Sorry but it is a lie that blacks supported Obama by 30 percent larger margin.
Kerry got 88 % of the black vote
Gore got about 91% of the black vote.
You do the math. Unless Obama got 121% of the black vote, your numbers are a result of either ignorance or deliberate contempt for the truth.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:36 pm
Hawaii won't release the original due to statute. So, Obama doesn't have to spend anything to “fight” it, nor should he. The fact is he was born today in Hawaii 48 years ago! And I hope he is having a wonderful birthday too. :)
http://www.thehamandlegsshow.com
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:36 pm
Hawaii won't release the original due to statute. So, Obama doesn't have to spend anything to “fight” it, nor should he. The fact is he was born today in Hawaii 48 years ago! And I hope he is having a wonderful birthday too. :)
http://www.thehamandlegsshow.com
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:37 pm
If it's a Kenyan birth certificate, why is it in english? No, really, I'm curious.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:37 pm
If it's a Kenyan birth certificate, why is it in english? No, really, I'm curious.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:37 pm
Put your race card away, Jeff. It's old and worn out and doesn't work anymore.
Plus, it makes you look stupid.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:37 pm
Put your race card away, Jeff. It's old and worn out and doesn't work anymore.
Plus, it makes you look stupid.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:37 pm
Put your race card away, Jeff. It's old and worn out and doesn't work anymore.
Plus, it makes you look stupid.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
The question was answered in the post you replied to. Why do you keep saying it hasn't been?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
The question was answered in the post you replied to. Why do you keep saying it hasn't been?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
The question was answered in the post you replied to. Why do you keep saying it hasn't been?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:41 pm
She doesn't have a copy. She only has that photograph.
Orly Taitz has no problem looking like a fool.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:41 pm
She doesn't have a copy. She only has that photograph.
Orly Taitz has no problem looking like a fool.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:41 pm
And the reason you can't afford it? Because you don't have a JOB because all you do is research this issue.
Hahahaha!
Laughing AT you, not with you.
P.S. saminva, I'm still waiting for your real birth certificate and not that fake. I'm sending INS to Virginia as we speak. Better get the real one, fast!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:41 pm
And the reason you can't afford it? Because you don't have a JOB because all you do is research this issue.
Hahahaha!
Laughing AT you, not with you.
P.S. saminva, I'm still waiting for your real birth certificate and not that fake. I'm sending INS to Virginia as we speak. Better get the real one, fast!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
No, it hasn't, Pablo. What that was is called an “assertion”, it is not a definitive answer.
Is English not your first language, or are you just rather slow and thick?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
No, it hasn't, Pablo. What that was is called an “assertion”, it is not a definitive answer.
Is English not your first language, or are you just rather slow and thick?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
No, it hasn't, Pablo. What that was is called an “assertion”, it is not a definitive answer.
Is English not your first language, or are you just rather slow and thick?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
No, it hasn't, Pablo. What that was is called an “assertion”, it is not a definitive answer.
Is English not your first language, or are you just rather slow and thick?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
No, it hasn't, Pablo. What that was is called an “assertion”, it is not a definitive answer.
Is English not your first language, or are you just rather slow and thick?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:42 pm
No, it hasn't, Pablo. What that was is called an “assertion”, it is not a definitive answer.
Is English not your first language, or are you just rather slow and thick?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:43 pm
Is anyone questioning whether Mama Obama was a US citizen who lived at least 5 years in the US?
Because with just that he could have been born in Kenya and still be US President.
Apparently, the question of natural born is a bigger issue with McCain than Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:43 pm
How much more will our White House spend to defeat court challenges about this? After over a MILLION US DOLLARS (where did all that money come from, certainly not Barack's checkbook?) how much more will they be spending? Why did they even spend one penny? HUH??? Why spend even ONE PENNY?
Is there a hidden agenda in our White House??
The million dollars spent on this by our White House was surely an incredible waste of someone's money!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
you sound like you should have been a Jim Jones follower, to follow blindly
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
Well if it were real, it would be because English is the official language, being a former British colony and all that. But since it's a doctored copy of an Australian certificate, that's why.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:46 pm
Kenya was British Colony until 1963 or 64 depending on who you talk.
They speak English in England.
Do you have any other incredibly ignorant questions you want answered?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:46 pm
Hey. the ironically named nottawacky (sic) has found out that Obama spent another $100k on it. Now we're up to $1 million! Do I hear $2 million?
nottawacky (sic) isawacky!
P.S. nottawacky, don't you mean notawacky?
Laughing at you too!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:47 pm
Once again, all I get is ad hominum attacks and accusations that I am the one who is crazy for asking a simple question that has NOT been answered:
Basic syllogism. All birthers are crazy. You are a birther. You are crazy. QED.
Why does that question get you so wound up?
It doesn't. Why does Barack Obama get you so wound up?
Why do YOU think Barry refuses to release the original?
First, he doesn't have it. Second, he doesn't need to.
(And what the Obama campaign released is NOT a copy of the original — but you already know that, don't you?)
The state doesn't photocopy originals, you idiot. They issue a COLB. It is a certified document good enough for any court in the land. That's what they issue, that's what he got, that's what was released. Get over it.
As for his grades — didn't we hear about Gearge Bush's C-average for 8 years?
We heard about a lot of things. Did Bush release his college transcripts? No, he did not. The New Yorker got ahold of one Yale transcript in 1999, but that's it. I didn't know about that until 2005 when Kerry's grades were found in a Navy file (he didn't release his college transcripts either).
Didn't we lampoon John Kerry's F's?
In 2005, yes. That was after the election, and he didn't release them.
Didn't we make endless fun of Sarah Palin's community college education?
I didn't, but whatever. Did she release her transcripts? No, she did not.
ALL Presidents in recent memory have released far more of their life records than Obama has.
False.
WHY is he hiding so much of his life?
Obviously to make people like you crazy. Doesn't take much.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:48 pm
Hey — I SAW Obama's Birth Certificate on numerous news programs — and it looks almost exactly like mine from Pennsylvania. Mine was good enough to get an international passport, a driver's license, and insurance.
Also, who are these idiots claiming Obama has spent $800,000 fighting the birthers? Obama has spent NOTHING fighting this lie — because he doesn't have to. It's not like this is a valid lawsuit or anything. It's a bunch of screaming lunatics.
Obama should never respond or engage with these creeps; does anyone really think the birthers will get all nice and happy if they see more documents?? The birthers HATE Obama and want to destroy him. He's wise to ignore their ignorant slanders.
,
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:50 pm
do not believe he is was born in america. time for him to release all documents about his birth. that is all he has to do what does he have to hide. you do not take a breath test if you think you will not pass you do not release your records if you do not believe they will pass same thing. america is in the biggest scam of all times
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:52 pm
Um, whom exactly am I following blindly? The birthers, who don't believe 100% of the government entities and non-crackpots that have investigated this?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:52 pm
Um, whom exactly am I following blindly? The birthers, who don't believe 100% of the government entities and non-crackpots that have investigated this?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:52 pm
I heard a billion trillion! In taxpayer money! No wonder the deficit is so big!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:52 pm
I heard a billion trillion! In taxpayer money! No wonder the deficit is so big!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:54 pm
I’ll give two good reason:
A)He would put them in their place, shut them up and enjoy an easy ride forward as these nutjobs wouldn’t dare open their mouths, or if they try to attack him they’d be ridiculed since they’d have lost any credibility!
B) Sending $20.00 to the State of Hawaii is a hell of a lot cheaper (and faster) than paying $800,000 plus dollars to his lawyers to shut these guys up. If nothing else, it certainly doesn’t look good to spend four hundred times the necessary amount to shut everybody up.
These two good reasons come from a Republican who already said in another thread here, that as far as I’m concerned, what Dr. Orly Taitz showed on TV was nothing more than a forgery, whether she herself knew it or not. AND I’m not a birther of any kind, I have other issues I consider more worthy of discussion
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:54 pm
yes. if someone asks a question, it usually means they ignore the answer, right?
so your answer just shows how rude you are.
thank you. no need to answer that one. have a good life.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:56 pm
Your right we actually have documentation proving one so they are VERY different.
Too bad you won't accept Obama's BC as valid, nor well you believe the Democratic Party, the FBI, Congress, and the Senate when they ALL AGREE HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:57 pm
Actually, John McCain would have been our first foreign-born president, since he was born in Panama. But you know what?
HE LOST.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:58 pm
What you “saw” is merely a certification that an original document exists. It is that original document that Obama refuses to release.
An original birth certificate includes more extensive information than the abbreviated COLB form that the Administration falsely claims is a “Birth Certificate”, this information includes the date, time, place and attending physician or midwife's signature.
Or, in the case of Hawaii in 1961, Obumble's COLB could simply refer to an original foreign birth certificate that is on-file with the Hawaiian Department of Records.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:58 pm
Is this really Dwight Schrute, using the screen name Atlas_Collins?
Okay, Dwight, if you're so smart, try this one. Why are birth certificates in Puerto Rico written in Spanish, and why do people there speak Spanish, when it is a territory of the US, which speaks English?
Riddle me that, Dwight!
P.S., Dwight, Kenya has two official languages, Swahili and English. Why is it only written in English and not also Swahili? Oh yeah, because it's from Australia.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:58 pm
Hey quick question which I'm sure someone has asked – was Kenya a Republic in 1959? I'm sure the country's independence came later….1963 or 1964.
Schoolboy forgery error….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 6:59 pm
That million dollars spent? Never happened. I have asked birthers over and over again for any evidence of the money “spent by Obama” to defend his birth certificate. It should be easy to find since the all documentation necessary would be in the public record of the court cases the birthers have been bringing. Names of lawyers, briefs filed, etc. Yet there is absolutely nothing.
Funniest of all, the whole “million dollars to prevent his birth certificate from being made public” idea was nothing more than an April Fool's joke in one of the British newspapers intended to mock the birther “movement”. How ironic that they have now adopted this joke as a central part of the conspiracy. Foolish is not strong enough a word for these people.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:01 pm
Suppose I concede he was born in Hawaii.
Why the secrecy? Why the careful parsing from the Hawaiin Health Secretary, and Governor (R).
I read a theory, and it makes sense.
Barak Hussein Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro when he moved to Indonesia. He lived under the name of Barak Soetoro, and in the divorce papers between his mother, and Lolo Soetoro when he was 19, he was listed as a child of the marriage. If he was only a stepchild, then he wouldn't be included in the divorce documents.
It would also explain why so much secrecy, since adoption records are recorded with the original birth certificate, and are usually protected by state law.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:01 pm
A thoughtful commentator pointed out the following. Suppose someone comes up with absolute proof that Obama is not a natural born citizens and that he should not be president. What are the main courses of action available to fix the problem. (1) he might do the honorable thing and resign. (2) The house might impeach him and the senate could remove him from office. Both actions would seem to be required to be action by honorable men and women sworn to uphold the constitution- fat chance that that will happen.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:02 pm
Not true, Dwight, not true. My birth certificate doesn't contain a midwife or attending physician's name. Does yours? Please post a link to a picture of it. Otherwise, I don't believe who you say you are, nor that you were born in the United States.
Laughing!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:02 pm
Obama was born in the U.S. which makes him a citizen. I guess you wouldn't know that since you never heard of the constitution. Any citizen who wants the facts can find them from any Govt. institution.Such as comments from Bush staffers who said, under oath that “The administration used lies, forged documents and deception to gain support for for our invasion of Iraq” who by the way has never lifted a finger against us. Agreed they gassed 5ooo people but an American phamacuticle company headed by none other than D. Rumsfeld provided them with the chemicals to produce such a weapon. That make us an accomplice to murder. That is publc information. As for waterboarding not considered torture why is it that the U.N. excecuted Japanese officers for the same thing. I get it, It's torture if they do it but since we decided to re-define torture to suit our goals, that makes us right. That sir is as arrogant and self rightious as you can get. People like you who blindly follow the Govt. are our biggest threat. Ever hear of “We the people”? Guess not. You know nothing of war so you have no right to justify our murderous actions. Also, do you or anybody else know why we invaded Iraq? I didn't think so. Hell, Bush doesn't even know. Do you know why the Iranians hate us? Ever hear of the Shau? You know the puppet we installed to persecute his own people. The monster we helped train and equip his secret death squads and slaughter his opponants. If that's not enough reason to hate us what about our downing of a regularly schedualed civilian airliner with 3oo civilians, killing all aboard. Then awarding each crew member a medal. Are you proud of our immoral actions? What has Iran ever done to us? Lets face it, you can't deny a word I've said which makes you UN-AMERICAN, Anti constitution and an accomplice of genocide..What I've just said isn't open to interpretation, It is a well know fact. Look it up….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:03 pm
I realize you're new to America, but that's now how the American justice system works. See, in America, you are innocent until proven guilty. That means that _YOU_ have to prove Obama wasn't born here.
He doesn't have to do anything, he was born here until you do your work. Stop being a lazy foreigner, do your job, and prove Obama wasn't born in the US.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:04 pm
Forget the birth certificate. Obama failed two more powerful identity tests at the All-Star Game. Just as characters in WWII movies could spot a non-American using baseball trivia, it is clear to anyone who watched why he doesn't share a common view with the majority of this country (of any race). For one slim moment you saw truth. . . a boy from Jakarta getting ready to play cricket! There is no way that man played baseball growing up. The media's complicit one-camera set-up could hide the pathetic outcome near the plate, but not that larger truth… Oh the other test, he also proved that he is not a cool black man by wearing those mommy jeans… Stop worrying about where he was born and turn up the lights on the media-packaging job, the cracks have started. Somebody call “Makeup!” the real Obama is showing!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:04 pm
Oh no, I've been accused of playing the RACE CARD. I assume you think all the right wing loud mouths who say Obama is a secret reverse racist sound stupid for playing the race card too, right? Because otherwise, I think that might make you a racist. Oh no, I did it again. How do I get out of this card game? Please deliver me from this craziness! I know in my heart that racism doesn't exist any more! It's just a coincindence that the older, whiter, dumber, and more southern you are, the less likely it is that you voted for the black guy!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:04 pm
Oh no, I've been accused of playing the RACE CARD. I assume you think all the right wing loud mouths who say Obama is a secret reverse racist sound stupid for playing the race card too, right? Because otherwise, I think that might make you a racist. Oh no, I did it again. How do I get out of this card game? Please deliver me from this craziness! I know in my heart that racism doesn't exist any more! It's just a coincindence that the older, whiter, dumber, and more southern you are, the less likely it is that you voted for the black guy!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:05 pm
Obama hasn't spent a single penny blocking anything. He has never needed to. All of the court cases filed by birthers have be thrown out, without President Obama or his lawyers having to lift a finger. You have been lied to by your birther pals. If they had any evidence for the money spent, they would have been spreading it all over the Internet. Since court documents are public, there should be a million dollars worth of lawyer briefs and submissions from the Obama team in the public record, yet there is none. Why do you think that is?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:07 pm
Or it COULD refer to his engram from planet Arcturus IV, stored in liquid nitrogen inside a secret military facility under the Pacific Ocean.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:08 pm
What you “saw” is merely a certification that an original document exists. It is that original document that Obama refuses to release.
He doesn't have it. The State of Hawaii has the original in their archives. They don't release those. They issue COLBs. He got one. It was made public last year. It's good enough for any court in the land. You are dumb.
An original birth certificate includes more extensive information than the abbreviated COLB form that the Administration falsely claims is a “Birth Certificate”, this information includes the date, time, place and attending physician or midwife's signature.
And?
Or, in the case of Hawaii in 1961, Obumble's COLB could simply refer to an original foreign birth certificate that is on-file with the Hawaiian Department of Records.
No, it couldn't. He was born in Honolulu, just like the COLB states. Honolulu is not a foreign country, idiot.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:09 pm
Well, it might make sense if there was any secrecy or careful parsing. I have a theory that you are the secret love child of Michael Jackson and Elizabeth Taylor. Makes sense.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:09 pm
His Birth Certificate has been released MULTIPLE times! Now you have pretty clear proof of a forged Kenyan Birht Certificate based on an Australian Birht Certificate and you still are playing ignorant. The ONE AND ONLY way people like yourself will ever believe is if you could go back in time and be present at the birth event!
Just can't figure out which you hate more, this Country or this President. Either way, the rest of us are working for the success of America!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:09 pm
The reason he does not “release his real birth certificate” it is distracting people from the GOP message. GOPer's are going on and on about this and it becomes a distraction over time for them. This is a classic game of using your own momentum against you. Instead of fighting it, he sits back and laughs at how silly it has all become and allows the GOPer's to hurt themselves. Let them keep it in the news with all these conspiracy theories and fake documents, because that will really lend to their credibility. What is really sad, that people believe them and buy into the garbage theories. Just admit it that you hate the fact he is in office and that it may or may not bother you that he is black and that he trounced John McCain. The sooner you realize your true inner feeling, and then you can move on from fantasy and step back into reality.
As for McCain, he was born in Panama during a time when it was not a incorporated territory of the United states. Depending on how you view natural born citizen, which could mean John McCain is not one. There was a resolution passed in Congress that “cleared up” his situation and declared him to be a natural born citizen. He needed a resolution from Congress to clear it up since there was a question to his legitimacy as a natural born citizen.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:10 pm
I read a theory too, and it makes even more sense.
You birthers can't handle the FACT that the Democratic Party now controls both houses of Congress, the majority of governorships and state houses, and the Office of the President, and so you are getting your panties twisted in bunches over some made up fake birth certificate. For many of you, you also can;t handdle the fact that a half-BLACK man is President.
Sorry dudes, but that's what happens when one party so messes up the nation for 8 years.
How's your stock portfolio doing, by the way? Mine's doing great since Obama came into office. Under Bush, the Dow fell 25% in 8 years. Not so hot….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:11 pm
Why the secrecy? Why the careful parsing from the Hawaiin Health Secretary, and Governor (R).
You crazy ass birthers are the ones parsing the words of Hawaii officials. What they said makes perfect sense to anyone who isn't deranged. He was born in Honolulu, just as his birth certificate states. Get over it, crazy ass birther.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:11 pm
That doesnt look like a Kenyan birth certificate.I'm a Kenyan and can conclusively say that is a forgery.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:11 pm
Mystery solved. Even IF the “birthers” are shown the forgery papers above, they won't believe it because they will do anything to discredit our election result and the people's choice for President. Many, many people have reviewed the authenticity issue. Birthers would like to make us believe that there's a “cover-up” concerning the facts. Cover-up by who? Who can successfully cover anything up in this day in age? Lou Dobbs gave them their voice and they were shown to be fools. If he refused to report on their nonissue they would have said, “the media is sweeping this under the rug.” The media is damned if they do and damned if they don't. What do you do about “nutcases” without calling them “nutcases”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:12 am
Hmmmm, so my daughter can never become president because she was home birthed? I’m a little confused here. Hell, they let McCain run for Pres and he wasn’t born inside the U S of A. Now granted he was born to a US serviceman on duty in Panama, so that really shouldn’t disqualify a person.
Now the question that must be asked in your little scenario is how midwives are certified and monitored. Some states do all but forbid midwives, but even then there are ways to verify such live births as having in fact taken place inside the state and not long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away.
I do find it interesting that you put faith in so called “government” sources but automatically assume the state of Hawaii will lie outright and willfully in such important matters as well as in everyday matters. Seems to be a case of selective memory, especially because you are reading intent into a law that doesnt say what you say it says. Where are you getting your statement of intent?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:12 pm
Bush was and is an idiot and a liar, that doesn't mean Obama is any less an idiot and a liar. The problem is the US has been divided by political parties and special interest groups, we should unite and demand our elected officials are for us not for their own pocket filling.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:12 pm
My granddaughter was born on a base in Puerto Rico and her birthcertificate from Puerto Rico is in English. And when I visited there the people did speak Spanish but they also spoke English.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:14 pm
Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution states: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of the President;”
Therefore, no one born after September 17, 1787 is or has ever been eligible to be president.
Ask a conservative to read this clause for you if you have trouble with it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:14 pm
LOL. Are you for real? When President Obama was in Indonesia (1967-1971) there wasn't any organized cricket in Indonesia. They only got going with the formation of the International Sports Club of Indonesia *in* 1971, the year Obama left.
Cricket is a wonderful game, but I highly doubt that Obama even knows which end of a cricket bat to hold.
But thanks for continuing to confirm to everyone else than birthers are blithering idiots.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:15 pm
Truly an idiot. The “original” document IS A VITAL STATISTIC RECORD!!!!! You try to get YOUR OWN ORIGINAL, and I GUARANTEE what you get is a CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORIGINAL!!! Where do these idiots crawl out from under? Did any of them go to school, take civics or government classes? I am looking at my own “Certificate of Live Birth” from NV (1964). It is my ORIGINAL…as in the one given to my parents upon my birth. It has the information you suggest…physician's name, name of hospital, etc. I also have a certified copy. IT DOES NOT HAVE THIS INFORMATION. I then looked at my 6 children's birth certificates. NONE of them have the additional information. They only have the city, county, and parent's birth place.
GIVE IT A REST!!!! Don't you have anything better to do with your life than hate?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:15 pm
Truly an idiot. The “original” document IS A VITAL STATISTIC RECORD!!!!! You try to get YOUR OWN ORIGINAL, and I GUARANTEE what you get is a CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORIGINAL!!! Where do these idiots crawl out from under? Did any of them go to school, take civics or government classes? I am looking at my own “Certificate of Live Birth” from NV (1964). It is my ORIGINAL…as in the one given to my parents upon my birth. It has the information you suggest…physician's name, name of hospital, etc. I also have a certified copy. IT DOES NOT HAVE THIS INFORMATION. I then looked at my 6 children's birth certificates. NONE of them have the additional information. They only have the city, county, and parent's birth place.
GIVE IT A REST!!!! Don't you have anything better to do with your life than hate?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:15 pm
Outside of my own posts, this is the best one of the day!
We're laughing at you birthers. So are most Americans. And you're dragging the GOP down with you.
For example, Lou Dobbs = birther, which means that his crazy anti-immigration ideas might be crazy too. And since most of the Republican Party is in line with Lou on that, they're all implicated as well. See how it works? You're circling around the drain at the bottom of the toilet, bringing the whole GOP with y'all.
Man, it's like shooting fish in a barrel!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:16 pm
True…Kenya was not a republic in 1959 furthermore we were using Her Majesty's Coat of arms because we were still under British rule not the one they have put there that came after we attained independence in 1964.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:16 pm
Riddle me this: The US of A has NO, repeated, NO official language. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, NO means NO. Although we call ourselves and are considered to be an English speaking nation, no provisions exist to make it “official”. You really should try being a bit more civil towards people there, Skippy.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:16 pm
To Birther, After-birther, Liberial or Conservative, if you know the 'Man' you will understand the 'Scam'!
G B
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:17 pm
What Secrecy??? His Birth Certificate has passed the review of the United States government, multiple News sources, the Hawaii Secretary of State and on and on…
Bottom line, there are people that WANT so badly to believe this boy can't be our President, that no level of information or facts will stop them from their tin foil hat rounds. But to appease your question of the “secrecy” of the REPUBLICAN Governor of Hawaii saying the Birth Certificate is valid, there is as Cons love to say “the Rule of Law”:
“Hawai'i's disclosure law (Hawai'i Revised Statutes 338-18) states “it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part on any such record …The Health Department “shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record.”
Wearing a tinfoil hat is not direct and tangible interest in the record.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:20 pm
Yes….true it should be under Her Majesty's Coat of Arms. Not republic of Kenya.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:20 pm
This is probably the best post yet. I would love to visit your world.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:21 pm
i am a Kenyan.Kenyan birth certificates are half the size of that shown here! and they do not resemble the one shown here in any way..
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:22 pm
Well, I think anyone who has heard both men utter a sentence, and who is being honest, would say that Obama is VERY MUCH less an idiot than Bush. And Obama a liar? List of proven lies, please.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
Sorry, you just contradicted yourself by combining “thoughtful commentator” with Obama not a Natural Born citizen!!
Jeeeeesus! This story alone shows that the primary “piece” of evidence used by the father of the birthers, Orly T., is a Document readily available online modified to be “proof.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
Sorry, you just contradicted yourself by combining “thoughtful commentator” with Obama not a Natural Born citizen!!
Jeeeeesus! This story alone shows that the primary “piece” of evidence used by the father of the birthers, Orly T., is a Document readily available online modified to be “proof.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
Sorry, you just contradicted yourself by combining “thoughtful commentator” with Obama not a Natural Born citizen!!
Jeeeeesus! This story alone shows that the primary “piece” of evidence used by the father of the birthers, Orly T., is a Document readily available online modified to be “proof.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
Sorry, you just contradicted yourself by combining “thoughtful commentator” with Obama not a Natural Born citizen!!
Jeeeeesus! This story alone shows that the primary “piece” of evidence used by the father of the birthers, Orly T., is a Document readily available online modified to be “proof.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:25 pm
the reason he will not release is he and the media are scamming the american people just so a black man can be in office and the way he and his congress is trying to run this country will ruin it and make us a third world country like he has always wanted us to be
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:25 pm
the reason he will not release is he and the media are scamming the american people just so a black man can be in office and the way he and his congress is trying to run this country will ruin it and make us a third world country like he has always wanted us to be
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:27 pm
And of course Irene you were born in Kenya's 'Coast Province' prior to 1964?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:29 pm
HAPPY BIRTHER DAY TO THE BIG 0!
Are the humiliating Comment-makers and name callers all paid CHICOM Netizens or just paid ACORN activists?
Thank God for Attny. Taitz and her actions to save the US Constitution and the US, itself.
Ever notice: On ALL the search engine searches (Read they've been suppressing pro-birther results) the criticisms of all us “Birthers” is the same as they do in Red China?
There, the government employs a horde of “Netizens” to go to sites to humiliate & denigrate & suppress anti-government talk. They're paid about $.25 per input, I've read.
Just like these apparent ACORN operatives do, they ALWAYS humiliate, denigrate, and use varying terms of “Mental Illness” in volume! Buzzwords like “Wingnut,” “Birther,” “Insane,”Unhinged, “Delusional,”Tin-hat,” “Conspiratorialist,” etc.
That's what happens to the average Chinese when they type out loud, and the CHICOMs have even more “Mental Health” Prisons as do the Russians.
The apparent wave of the future for us here in Obamaland? Is this why The Great O is building more prisons on military bases?
The CHICOMS have been waging economic and PSYOPS warfare on us a long time, at least since JFK (Oooh.. LISTEN TO THEM HOWL, NOW!). They've apparently continued their terroristic use of Biblical prophesies and Feng Sui (Remember what they did on 6/6/6? On 7/4/6?) by creating as part of The Big 0's Economic Manchurian Candidate grooming and Legend, that he's “Actually the Anti-Christ” (Imagine the desired conquer-and-divide reactions.) That his name, “Barack Obama,” as pronounced, means “Antichrist,” in ancient Hebrew from the Book of Luke, according to a religious researcher. The video, actually a good one, can be seen at this YouTube video on World Net News.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI… is the site. I bet the CHICOMS knew this when they choose his Legend name.
This creation of a well-groomed “Legend,” part of an overall economic warfare agenda, taking over at the top, is as old espionage craft as is planting posts in prominent Hawaii newspapers, making myth evolve into “The Truth.”
.I lived on Maui when they were contemplating that legislation for the COLB's. At first it was touted as being “Generous” for the cheap immigrant Filipino sugar cane workers, because it allowed them access to Hawaii's huge entitlement programs. But when the Legislature found out hat it could potentially let a foreign, hostile, espionage agent in as US President, they RUSHED to pass that bill. HI is half-way to Red China IN EVERY WAY YOU CAN THINK OF. Very asian-based racist, they love to rip off tourists of any color or race, but there is not a school in Hawaii that does not have “Kill Ha'ole Day,” the first day of school, where any Caucasian kid who doesn't want to get beaten stays home. Gov. Waihe'e himself sanctioned the practice, calling it “Cultural.”
Hawaii politicians are more corrupt and racist than NJ or Chicago. Call ME a conspiriatoralist? For my own anti-drug work, I was beaten three times. Twice by the Lahaina Mafia, and once by the Maui PD. You could ask Sen. Inouye about it – He wrote to say it would be investigated. What ever happened? The Big 0…
These people who know not that major criminal and espionage crime are, indeed, CONSPIRING, ought to get off their high horses, and stand among common men such as myself, in the know, and in the craft, for a change, before flinging their verbal spears at others.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:30 pm
It's not a matter of tinfoil, the intelect involved in spending millions to hide your birth certificate, then millions more to hide your college records, if in fact there is nothing to hide leads me to believe that this guy isn't the person I want as the president.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:30 pm
It's not a matter of tinfoil, the intelect involved in spending millions to hide your birth certificate, then millions more to hide your college records, if in fact there is nothing to hide leads me to believe that this guy isn't the person I want as the president.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:32 pm
Funny… Because since Obama took office, I've lost my job, my portfolio is worth half what it was a year and a half ago and we're spending billions of dollars on useless “programs” like Cash for Clunkers. Hey, there's an idea: waste billions of taxpayer dollars so that people can go out and buy an new Honda or Toyota! Brilliant! Yessiree, Obama is the best thing to happen to this country since the boll weevil, Nancy Pelosi and tuberculosis.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:38 am
I’m interested that you put so little faith in the government of Hawaii, believing they will outright lie on an important matter, yet will trust one particular type of document from them as 100% accurate.
Equally, I must admit to amusement at the belief in some kind of conspiracy (and yes I know you havent used that word, but if it quacks like a duck) in the matter of keeping the long form “hidden,” and can’t seem to understand the idea that a state will hold documents from public view for their own reason, no matter who the document is about (Joe Average or the first Black non-Kenyan really born inside the US of A President of the US of A).
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:38 pm
I could care less if it matches the Australian paperwork of the time period vs. if it matches the Kenyan paperwork of the time… That what makes it a forgery in my mind? Yes?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:40 pm
Where's the Birth Certificate?
Such a simple question has never stirred the passion of so many people who oh so want to Believe that Barry is something other than the inept, unprepared, naive ideologue extremist he's proving himself to be.
True Believers are always a hoot to watch as they froth about and fling spittle and invective at all who challenge their dearly held dogmas.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:43 pm
Who cares about fake Kenyan birth certificates? Let's just see the American one.
They sure are willing to go to great lengths to avoid showing the American birth certiifcate they insist exists and yet refuse to show. Any child knows that when someone is willing to go to great lenths, all more difficult than simply producing the proof, that either that proof does not exist or does not prove what is claimed. Any child knows this.
Then, when people start making up degrading names such as “birther” to describe people asking a simple, rational, reasonable question, and then begin to ridicule anyone asking the “forbidden question” and trying to make them all out to be ” a crazy fringe element”… that is even more reason to believe that the proof that would be simple to produce, yet they refuse too, either does not exist or does not prove the claim.
All people are doing is asking a simple question “Since the Constitution specifically requires a person be born in the US to be president, and since there has long been an avoidance of showing the proof the current president insists exists, why can't we see this proof? Why is this man and his supporters willing to go to great lengths to avoid simply showing this piece of paper?” These are simple, logical, rational questions that any child might ask if faced with similar circumstances. Here's an example, you can try this on your own child and see how they react.
Show your child your closed hand and tell him there is a gold coin in your hand. When he/she asks to see it, show them a picture of a gold coin instead. When that doesn't convince them (and it won't), have your spouse also insist the coin is in your hand. When they, again, ask for you to simply open your hand and show it too you, show them another picture of the coin… this time of you holding both it and a copy of today's news paper. Keep doing anything but the most simple thing, that would prove beyond all doubt that the coin is in your hand, and see if you are EVER able to convince your child that there is a gold coin in your hand. You won't be able to, because even a child has enough sense to know that they are being lied too in this situation.
This is exactly the situation with Obama's birth certificate, that they insist they have but refuse to show and thus end all debate instantly. Your child is logical enough to not fall for this song and dance… why are you more gulible than your own child?
The more they are willing to do to avoid simply showing the birth certificate, the more logical and rational people will be convince that said birth certificate either does not exist or would prove that he was not born in Hawaii. There is nothing “crazy” or “conspiratorial” about this, it is simple logic that any child understands… and you can prove that to yourself by trying to convince your child that coin is in your hand in the exact same manner that Obama's supporters are trying to convince you without doing the most simple thing and just showing you a piece of paper they claim to have.
If you tire of your child refusing to believe you about the coin, start calling him “coiner” and insisting that only crazy people don't believe that the coin is in your hand. It's mean, and you probably shouldn't actually do this part, but you would find that it would shut him up. That type of psychological warfare has long been known to be very effective… ask yourself why it is being used on this subject, rather than simply producing the evidence, showing a piece of paper.
A logical and rational person can only conclude, based on the “available evidence”, that Obama's alleged American birth certificate either does not exist or would for some reason not prove that he was born in Hawaii. That is the only logical and rational conclusion that can be reached given the circumstances, as any child can tell you.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:46 pm
Is this a great country or what? We are so into diversity and tolerance that we elect our first foreign born president. It makes me proud to be an American.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:46 pm
Also, the state of Illinois, the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Naturalization Services, and (drum roll, please) the Republican Party.
Heckuva conspiracy, Brownie!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:48 pm
Is this a film treatment, or the outline of a novel? Good luck with that!
Honest to goodness: if you really believe this bilge you're spouting, you should seek professional help.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:49 pm
Silly boy – you are a political gift from heaven for Democrats. The longer you continue this nonsense the further you marginalize yourself. Keep it up…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:52 pm
martykayzee, you forgot to utilize the word “except” in your reasoning…
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:55 am
Actually, it happens to be true. It was revealed today that Obama is getting four times as many death threats as Bush received and I’ve read enough birther web sites to know that the cause of their visceral hatred of the man is much more than any policy issue he has followed. It’s no accident that a recent survey showed that birtherism is far and away most concentrated in the area of the country where racism is still the most prevalent — the deep South.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:57 am
Sabbur, by this comment, as the others I find it clear that you are unlearned about what Life is really about. Jesus is God, but you do not yet comprehend that. Well, for the sake of your salvation, let me attempt to enlighten you. When God gave out those CURSES in the 3rd Chapter of Genesis; He cursed the snake, personally; and when He cursed the woman, He did that personally. But, when He came to cursing Adam, He stated “CURSED IS THE GROUND”. Why Sabbur, did He say cursed is the ground? All of the Creation of the initial week of Creation; it all came from The Ground and because Adam was given the responsibility of that Creation and fail, then that Creation FAILED. Numbers 23:19 says that God is not man that He should LIE; neither the son of man that He should repent… If God cannot LIE nor can He change His Mind, then how can The Curse be removed? God removed That Cursed Word that He Cursed man by in The Garden of Eden
by crucifying That Word that was born of a virgin on the cross at Calvary and rose That Word from its Death that Third Day Morning. Hebrew 11:6 states “But without Faith it is impossible to please Him (God); for He that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a REWARDER of them that diligently seek Him. If you don’t get THIS, it really doesn’t affect me because I have done my part in sharing it with you. When I say to people GOD BLESS YOU, I am wishing them the best of being WELL. I’d rather people to be well and not damned or whatever choice of this word that you want to use. THIS WILL BE MY LAST ADDRESS TO YOUR COMMENTS; it is amusing to see how sarcastically intelligent that you think you are. John 1:1, 14 tells you that Jesus is The Word of GOD that became flesh. GOD Bless You.
Ira L. Lewis
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:58 pm
>”The more they are willing to do to avoid simply showing the birth certificate, the more logical and rational people will be convince that said birth certificate either does not exist or would prove that he was not born in Hawaii. There is nothing “crazy” or “conspiratorial” about this, it is simple logic that any child understands… “
Exactly so, and also exactly why the “birther” phenomenon has now become a full-blown “Movement”.
It's why I got on board after at first dismissing the claims as so much griping about a lost election.
See, when I looked at the facts, the facts don't add up. Obumble's hiding something, and the vitriol and hate being spewed by his defenders will do more to grow the movement than otherwise.
I hear some of the elitist True Believers calling the birthers “dangerous”.
Dangerous? Free Speech is now “dangerous” in America?
Such is the anti-freedom hate that fills the Obamaites.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 7:59 pm
Yes, but why NOT show it? What could be so embarassing ?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:02 pm
You can't see his birth certificate – yeah, yeah, yeah…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:04 pm
Sorry, you can't see his birth certificate. Would you like to see my butt instead?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:04 pm
Wow, the Shau and pharmacuticles! Where do I get me some of those? Um, FYI: Its the “Shah” and “pharmaceuticles”. Theres a little thing called spell check. Handy, especially if you're trying to make yourself appear smarter than you actually are.
What you said IS open to interpretation, therefore, I'm going to tear it a new orafice. You also speak of blindly following the government, yet you clearly state in the second line of your poorly thought-out rant that we can obtain “the facts” “from any Govt. institution”. Now, that is just every so slightly contradictory right there. You accuse people of blindly following, and you blatently state, that the government is going to provide me factual information via any one of its many institutions? Hmm, that sounds a bit like blindly following or believing to me!
What has Iran ever done to us? Here's some advice: Do a web search! The hostage crisis of the Carter administration comes to mind. How about the many human rights violations that occur regularly there? Oh, and didn't I just hear something about 3 missing hikers being detained by the Iranian government? You must not get out much, with all of the inconsistancies in your poorly-stated point.
I'll tell you what makes YOU un-American, is the fact that I, and many others have opinions which differ from yours, and you are trying to tell ME that I'm wrong. Well, my friend, THAT is un-American. This country was founded by great visionaries who saw a chance to found a great society for all to have freedoms and differing notions, opinions and beliefs. Now here you are, telling me that I'm UN-AMERICAN because I don't see eye to eye with you. The only reason I've picked this thing apart is because you are a hypocrite and a coward. That is just shameful! Why should/would/could I respect your views if you don't respect mine?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:06 pm
I find it hard to believe the only credible reason is that he refuses just to annoy his political enemies?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:07 pm
……. CONGRESS UNCOVERS INFORMATION REGARDING ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT WITH
THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 911
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:08 am
Well, the “Parents” in this case are the State of Hawaii, not Obama or his supporters. And yes, a state can and does seal documents even when it is not in the best interests of the citizen. For example, as stated above, I can’t see my birth records as they are sealed due to my adoption. I’m the child in these proceedings and the state won’t show me the records.
The “child” in this case are two different Federal Judges, both of whom have seen the records and dismissed the cases against Obama.
So, your analogy breaks down real fast. Try another one.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:08 pm
The search for universal truth is limitless in energy. That is why so many questions on this issue.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:08 pm
The search for universal truth is limitless in energy. That is why so many questions on this issue.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:10 pm
Where's the birth certificate? On file in Honolulu, Hawai'i, just as my original birth certificate is on file in Montclair, New Jersey, and yours is in the records of whatever town you were born in.
When I got my passport, I provided a certified copy of my birth certificate as proof of citizenship, because the town clerk in Montclair would not have mailed me the original.
President Obama couldn't show you his original birth certificate even if he wanted to, any more than I can show you my birth certificate. He has, however, shown the world a certified copy, which is all any reasonable person would need to see in order to acknowledge he is a natural-born citizen of the United States.
The only frothing and flinging here is being done by people convinced that this incompetent government of ours has managed to pull off one of the greatest conspiracies of all time, one involving the states of Hawai'i and Illinois, the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Naturalization Services, the Supreme Court … and oh yes, the Republican Party. After all, who else would have more incentive or more connections to pull out all the stops in an effort to disprove President Obama's citizenship?
But go ahead. Take comfort in the lies being fed to you if it makes you happy, you poor pathetic deluded True Believer. they are all you have, as you certainly have no empirical data to support your dearly held dogma.
After all, as Stephen Colbert observed, reality has a well-known liberal bias.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:11 pm
Hey, it could be. He IS the smartest black man on the planet, after all. He's probably just waiting for the 2010 elections, then he'll whip it out to prove all his detractors not only wrong, but crazy as well. ::)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:12 pm
…please clarify – “except” what…?
—– Original Message —–
From: Disqus
To: martykz@email.com
Subject: [washingtonindependent] Re: Is This the Source of the Forged
'Kenyan Birth Certificate'?
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:55:15 -0000
blmhny wrote, in response to martykayzee:
martykayzee, you forgot to utilize the word “except” in your
reasoning…
Link to comment:
http://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-…
–
You may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off
notifications, go to your Disqus settings at:
http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:12 pm
…please clarify – “except” what…?
—– Original Message —–
From: Disqus
To: martykz@email.com
Subject: [washingtonindependent] Re: Is This the Source of the Forged
'Kenyan Birth Certificate'?
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:55:15 -0000
blmhny wrote, in response to martykayzee:
martykayzee, you forgot to utilize the word “except” in your
reasoning…
Link to comment:
http://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-…
–
You may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off
notifications, go to your Disqus settings at:
http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:12 pm
…please clarify – “except” what…?
—– Original Message —–
From: Disqus
To: martykz@email.com
Subject: [washingtonindependent] Re: Is This the Source of the Forged
'Kenyan Birth Certificate'?
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:55:15 -0000
blmhny wrote, in response to martykayzee:
martykayzee, you forgot to utilize the word “except” in your
reasoning…
Link to comment:
http://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-…
–
You may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off
notifications, go to your Disqus settings at:
http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:13 pm
…please clarify – “except” what…?
—– Original Message —–
From: Disqus
To: martykz@email.com
Subject: [washingtonindependent] Re: Is This the Source of the Forged
'Kenyan Birth Certificate'?
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:55:15 -0000
blmhny wrote, in response to martykayzee:
martykayzee, you forgot to utilize the word “except” in your
reasoning…
Link to comment:
http://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-…
–
You may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off
notifications, go to your Disqus settings at:
http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:13 pm
There were some moonbat birthers whining about McCain being born in the PCZ, but the party leadership told them to STFU because they were making the party look silly and petty. You guys need the same thing fom your leadership.
I believe you're sincere about his NBC status (or that it's any more racist than some attacks on Palin and Clinton were sexist) but even if you don't believe any of the documentation he's shown and the FBI didn't vet him, consider some common sense stuff. Why would his parents fly across the world to a third world nation (not cheap) when she was nine months pregnant? Why would they be in Mombasa (if you believe Ms. Taintz), 1000 miles from his father's home village? Why would he have gone through his entire life without telling anyone he was born in Kenya; unless you believe everyone he told is staying quiet and always have?
Concentrate on his policies. I know you have some serious issues, both practically and idealogically, that do merit well-articulated (not that us moonbats are above ranting) public discussion. It'd be better for your movement and for the country.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:15 pm
What evidence do you have to support your ridiculous contention that one thin dime has been spent by anyone to hide anything?
Go ahead. One verifiable citation will do nicely.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:15 pm
What evidence do you have to support your ridiculous contention that one thin dime has been spent by anyone to hide anything?
Go ahead. One verifiable citation will do nicely.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:16 am
So what you’re saying is forty years ago, an 18 year old girl flew to Kenya, gave birth to a child, the midwife , mother and child flew back to Hawaii, the midwife (a kenyan most likely) swore she was there at the birth of the child and the mother and midwife swore the birth took place inside Hawaii and the official did not look into the nationality of the midwife all of this instead of the mother staying in Hawaii and giving birth to the child in a hospital and all of this so the child could have US citizenship (eventually). So the more complicated and convoluted and unlikely story is the true one is what you’re saying?
Course, we could slightly uncomplicate it by finding a midwife in Hawaii who for a few bucks would lie and say she was there and the birth took place in Hawaii, but that isn’t uncomplicating things by much.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:16 pm
Or maybe he already released his birth certificate, as issued by the State of Hawaii, and you are all just deranged birthers who will never accept reality….
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
The only vitriole and hate I see is coming from those who refuse to accept the simple fact that President Obama has already shown the world a certified copy of his birth certificate.
Are you saying you won't believe it until he flies you to Honolulu, walks you into the records office, and asks the clerk to show it to you personally?
Sheesh. What some people won't do for a free trip to Hawai'i.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
The only vitriole and hate I see is coming from those who refuse to accept the simple fact that President Obama has already shown the world a certified copy of his birth certificate.
Are you saying you won't believe it until he flies you to Honolulu, walks you into the records office, and asks the clerk to show it to you personally?
Sheesh. What some people won't do for a free trip to Hawai'i.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
>”But go ahead. Take comfort in the lies being fed to you if it makes you happy, you poor pathetic deluded True Believer. they are all you have, as you certainly have no empirical data to support your dearly held dogma.”
Sorry. It is YOU who is the True Believer here since it is you who is doing the believing of faith alone.
Obama has NOT released his original birth certificate. This is established and irrefutable fact. What Obumble has shown is a “Certification Of Live Birth” which itself is a document that refers to an original document on file: the long-form birth certificate which Obama has REFUSED to release for public scrutiny.
Now, I could make a personal insult back at you — as ALL of you True Believers have done nothing but hurl insults at anyone asking a simple question, but I don't need to. Your unAmerican hatred of freedom comes through loud and clear.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
>”But go ahead. Take comfort in the lies being fed to you if it makes you happy, you poor pathetic deluded True Believer. they are all you have, as you certainly have no empirical data to support your dearly held dogma.”
Sorry. It is YOU who is the True Believer here since it is you who is doing the believing of faith alone.
Obama has NOT released his original birth certificate. This is established and irrefutable fact. What Obumble has shown is a “Certification Of Live Birth” which itself is a document that refers to an original document on file: the long-form birth certificate which Obama has REFUSED to release for public scrutiny.
Now, I could make a personal insult back at you — as ALL of you True Believers have done nothing but hurl insults at anyone asking a simple question, but I don't need to. Your unAmerican hatred of freedom comes through loud and clear.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
>”But go ahead. Take comfort in the lies being fed to you if it makes you happy, you poor pathetic deluded True Believer. they are all you have, as you certainly have no empirical data to support your dearly held dogma.”
Sorry. It is YOU who is the True Believer here since it is you who is doing the believing of faith alone.
Obama has NOT released his original birth certificate. This is established and irrefutable fact. What Obumble has shown is a “Certification Of Live Birth” which itself is a document that refers to an original document on file: the long-form birth certificate which Obama has REFUSED to release for public scrutiny.
Now, I could make a personal insult back at you — as ALL of you True Believers have done nothing but hurl insults at anyone asking a simple question, but I don't need to. Your unAmerican hatred of freedom comes through loud and clear.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
>”But go ahead. Take comfort in the lies being fed to you if it makes you happy, you poor pathetic deluded True Believer. they are all you have, as you certainly have no empirical data to support your dearly held dogma.”
Sorry. It is YOU who is the True Believer here since it is you who is doing the believing of faith alone.
Obama has NOT released his original birth certificate. This is established and irrefutable fact. What Obumble has shown is a “Certification Of Live Birth” which itself is a document that refers to an original document on file: the long-form birth certificate which Obama has REFUSED to release for public scrutiny.
Now, I could make a personal insult back at you — as ALL of you True Believers have done nothing but hurl insults at anyone asking a simple question, but I don't need to. Your unAmerican hatred of freedom comes through loud and clear.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
>”But go ahead. Take comfort in the lies being fed to you if it makes you happy, you poor pathetic deluded True Believer. they are all you have, as you certainly have no empirical data to support your dearly held dogma.”
Sorry. It is YOU who is the True Believer here since it is you who is doing the believing of faith alone.
Obama has NOT released his original birth certificate. This is established and irrefutable fact. What Obumble has shown is a “Certification Of Live Birth” which itself is a document that refers to an original document on file: the long-form birth certificate which Obama has REFUSED to release for public scrutiny.
Now, I could make a personal insult back at you — as ALL of you True Believers have done nothing but hurl insults at anyone asking a simple question, but I don't need to. Your unAmerican hatred of freedom comes through loud and clear.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
if you people who support this president and this congress and say you are working for the success of America are either too stupid are just the ones who are recieving money from the government and want more
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
if you people who support this president and this congress and say you are working for the success of America are either too stupid are just the ones who are recieving money from the government and want more
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
if you people who support this president and this congress and say you are working for the success of America are either too stupid are just the ones who are recieving money from the government and want more
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:22 am
What is the source for your claim that “Obama is getting four times as many death threats as Bush received”? And how significant would 8 death threats versus 2 actually be?
By the way, I have read several “birther” websites, and I have had NO reason to think they are motivated by racism. AT ALL. Perhaps you seek out and read only those “birther” websites which seem to you to verify your view of birthers as racist.
Also, I have never said that there is absolutely no racism in the U.S.; and I have never said that the deep South is a bastion of egalitarianism. However, the correlation you mention is NOT proof that the cause of “birtherism” in the deep South is racism – perhaps those in the deep South are simply more independent-minded than most, and the least likely to listen to liberal news media, resulting in their being the least brain-washed.
Perhaps I can counter your claim with the observation that many blacks are CLEARLY racist, hating whites, and that many in the liberal media are Obama-worshipers, and that this explains why so many reject the claims of “birthers”. But I wouldn’t even try to do so, because, though those observations are true, they are not sufficient to proof a causal relationship, just like your “observations”, though possibly true, would not be.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:24 pm
His birth certificate has been posted online, shown to members of Congress (including both parties), and verified by Hawaiian state officials. The long form that so many birthers are demanding isn't available for public viewing but it has been seen and verified by Hawaiian officials. They stated that Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. The birthers just can't stand the idea of a man of color being our president. Their motto is “If it ain't white, it ain't right”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:24 pm
His birth certificate has been posted online, shown to members of Congress (including both parties), and verified by Hawaiian state officials. The long form that so many birthers are demanding isn't available for public viewing but it has been seen and verified by Hawaiian officials. They stated that Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. The birthers just can't stand the idea of a man of color being our president. Their motto is “If it ain't white, it ain't right”.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:26 pm
He CAN'T release his original birth certificate, any more than YOU can.
And, if you did even the slightest bit of research, you'd know that the “Certificate of Live Birth” is what Hawai'i uses when issueing certified copies.
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090…
Why do you hate reason and logic?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:29 pm
Replace “Obama's birth certificate” (or “coin” in your lame analogy) with “God” and you've just made a great argument for atheism.
And you compare yourself to a whiny child who won't listen to his parents. How appropriate…
Seriously, do you really think that when going to obtain a loan for a car, the financiers would refuse your bank statement as evidence, and demand that you withdraw all your money in cash and carry it in in a wheelbarrow?
We have official documents recording the existence of something else for a reason, so you don't have to be encumbered with the security risk of carrying around the original.
You're a racist, plain and simple. Everyone knows it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
Not simply annoy – rather to divide and conquer.
—– Original Message —–
From: Disqus
To: martykz@email.com
Subject: [washingtonindependent] Re: Is This the Source of the Forged
'Kenyan Birth Certificate'?
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:08:31 -0000
markclar wrote, in response to martykayzee:
I find it hard to believe the only credible reason is that he
refuses just to annoy his political enemies?
Link to comment:
http://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-…
–
You may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off
notifications, go to your Disqus settings at:
http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
>”Are you saying you won't believe it until he flies you to Honolulu, walks you into the records office, and asks the clerk to show it to you personally?”
He can give his permission for Hawaii to release a copy to the media. Period. It would cost him $5 and a two minute phone call.
But he refuses.
Why? Why do you think he's hiding his birth records, his school records, his medical records, his passport records, his adoption records, etc … ?
What is he hiding? Obviously he's hiding something?
Why are you afraid of the Truth?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:34 pm
Collins won't bother responding to the points you raise, as they show his/her argument to be idiotic. Just like all the birthers, he/she will ignore it and ask why you hate the Constitution, or why you are so incurious about Obama's super-secret identity, or some other detour into crazyland. Relevant facts? Who cares?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:34 pm
Collins won't bother responding to the points you raise, as they show his/her argument to be idiotic. Just like all the birthers, he/she will ignore it and ask why you hate the Constitution, or why you are so incurious about Obama's super-secret identity, or some other detour into crazyland. Relevant facts? Who cares?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:35 pm
Pharmaceuticals. Spell check is handy, especially if you're trying to make yourself appear smarter than you really are.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:36 pm
Could you really care less? How much less could you care? Or do you mean that you could NOT care less? Next time consult an English teacher before you comment.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:39 pm
He can give his permission for Hawaii to release a copy to the media.
He already released one himself. Oh, you want the State of Hawaii to break their own rules and procedures, get his original out of the archives and photocopy it? Why? You will just declare it a forgery anyway.
Why?
Because there is no reason for him to do so.
Why do you think he's hiding his birth records,
He's not. He released them.
his school records, his medical records, his passport records,
Why should he release those?
his adoption records, etc … ?
He wasn't adopted.
What is he hiding? Obviously he's hiding something?
That's only obvious to crazy ass birthers.
Why are you afraid of the Truth?
We already have the truth. Barack Obama, United States citizen born in Honolulu, is President of the United States. You are a crazy ass birther. That's the truth.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:39 pm
He can give his permission for Hawaii to release a copy to the media.
He already released one himself. Oh, you want the State of Hawaii to break their own rules and procedures, get his original out of the archives and photocopy it? Why? You will just declare it a forgery anyway.
Why?
Because there is no reason for him to do so.
Why do you think he's hiding his birth records,
He's not. He released them.
his school records, his medical records, his passport records,
Why should he release those?
his adoption records, etc … ?
He wasn't adopted.
What is he hiding? Obviously he's hiding something?
That's only obvious to crazy ass birthers.
Why are you afraid of the Truth?
We already have the truth. Barack Obama, United States citizen born in Honolulu, is President of the United States. You are a crazy ass birther. That's the truth.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:40 pm
marklang keeps sating any child knows … so I asked a child . She says people should try to be nice to marklang – he's crazy , not bad .
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:40 pm
So, Thedes, you “believe” based only upon hearsay evidence and a purported document that refers to an original document that may or may not exist?
I'll bet you are sought after for jury service, aren't you?
And please put your race card away. It doesn't work anymore. That Barry's father was a no-account Kenyan schmuck who abandoned Barry's mom shortly after he was born, like so many black seem to do to their children, has nothing to do with Barry's hiding of nearly all of his relevant life documents.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:41 pm
“He can give his permission for Hawaii to release a copy to the media. Period. It would cost him $5 and a two minute phone call.”
Wrong. Hawaiian law states that a BC can only be released to someone with a direct and tangible interest in it. That leaves his immediate family. He can't give the Hawaii department of Health permission to break Hawaiian law. So, unless you're Sasha or Malia, you ain't getting diddly from Hawaii, no matter what he says.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:43 pm
There are some effective drugs to treat schizophrenia today. Please talk to your psychiatrist.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:44 pm
Looks like someone has a problem with “black men,” doesn't it.
What. A. Surprise.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:45 pm
The cleaners called, your robes are bleached and ready, just in time for the ceremony, and they added extra starch to your hood, just like you asked.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:46 pm
The entire “birther” movement is absurd. It is Bill Clinton redux. Republicans tossing mud at a wall, and hoping idiots will believe some of it. We had this same garbage for the entire 8 years of the Clinton Administration, and that is because these “birther” people are not reasonable, thinking, sane individuals. So it is crazy on our part to treat them as sane, thinking, reasonable individuals. As with Bill Clinton, when the “birther” movement fizzles out, they'll be on to their next imaginary scandal because the right wing in this country has alot of money behind the people that originally push this garbage. What we see here in these forums are the dimwits that march in lock-step with blind party loyalty, without ever bothering to think, and consider things for themselves. Heavens no, that takes effort. The entire “birther” movement sinks to the depths of the gutter it belongs in based on one simple fact. Not one other thing matters. Not the document, not the Hawaiian Governor, not the attempted forgeries, not what Lou Dobbs, or Michael Savage say. It sinks based on the fact that the two newspapers of record in Hawaii have the birth announcement for Barack Hussein Obama on microfiche from 1961. You simply cannot get beyond that without getting into either 1) Time travel or 2) The greatest conspiracy ever hatched married to the wildest luck in the universe by placing a false birth announcement 48 years ago in Hawaii just on the small hope that perhaps Barack Obama might get elected as President 48 years later. You “birthers” are comically ridiculous, and all you are doing is ruining the chances of the Republicans holding an office higher than dog catcher in Fargo, ND in your lifetimes.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:46 pm
He has shown the certificate, as issued by the State of Hawaii. It's the only kind they issue. Deal with it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:49 pm
Furthermore, those rules are for certificates that the state actually issues (the COLB), not for photocopies of original documents that are archived. There are no rules for the proper release of those documents, because they don't release them.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:58 pm
I can think of two legitimate reasons why Obama would not direct the state of Hawaii to produce his original birth certificate:
1) Catering to the demands of lunatics never makes you look good in the end and only encourages them to demand something else
2) The birther moverment is one of the better things that's happened to the Democratic party in recent years, since it makes the whole right wing look nuts. So he's content to let them go on making fools of themselves.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:59 pm
Ok, Marty… Since when is a blog an English Class – let's discuss the subject and not the grammar… I think my comment speaks to the real issue… Who gives a rip if it is similar to Australia, Japan or England… Logically, does that prove it is NOT from Kenya? (take a logic class) The key point here… is it truly from Kenya – is it the same as the Kenyan Birth Registrations at that time? Pretty simple… if so, then “maybe” there is something there… If not, then case closed… Yes? (hopefully proper english)
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 8:59 pm
Of course, when the fake bush docs came out, the “source” was tracked down and labeled a kook, but the theory was that Rove actually put them in his hand to ultimately shut up the critics of bush's pathetic military record.
So, isn't it possible that Obama's handlers have put this in the crazy lady's hands just to make the birthers look like fools? Gee, maybe there is more to the story….
Just for fun.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:01 pm
Mid-term elections are always a referendum on the President.
That is why Obama cares about the 2010 elections.
That is why he is pushing hard to get healthcare reform passed this year, so that Democrats can have some further success to campaign on.
The economy will be in better shape, the stimulus will continue to take effect, and Americans will see that their black (gasp!) President managed to make good on his pledge to bring real change.
Nowhere in any of this does Obama need to acknowledge the birthers himself.
I learned a long time ago that when you are at oral argument before a judge, and opposing counsel is saying ridiculous nonsense, there's no need to interrupt him in the process.
I once had a lawyer ramble on for 10 minutes while the Judge actually looked at and picked at something on the bottom of his shoe! When the lawyer finished talking, the Judge asked me if I had anything to add. I said “my position is set forth in my papers, Your Honor. I agree with Your Honor's tentative ruling in my client's favor.” I won the motion, needless to say.
Just like Obama is kicking his political opponents in the ass by using the birthers to discredit the conservatives and Republicans in general. They are the conservative movement's worst enemy.
“Conservatives see that hazard.
The conservative talk show host Michael Medved recently referred to the movement's leaders as “crazy, nutburger, demagogue, money-hungry, exploitative, irresponsible, filthy conservative imposters” who are “the worst enemy of the conservative movement.”
“It makes us look weird. It makes us look crazy. It makes us look demented. It makes us look sick, troubled, and not suitable for civilized company,” he mourned.
One of the lead anti-Obama lawyers, Orly Taitz, a California dentist with a degree from an online law school, promptly threatened to sue Medved for defamation.”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19450…
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:01 pm
[...] Stu, nice BC forgery job: The Washington Independent Is This the Source of the Forged ‘Kenyan Birth Certificate?’ __________________ Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:04 pm
Mantis…its very simple.
The short-form Certificat of Live Birth, or COLB, that he released can be obtained by people who were born outside of the state of Hawaii or even outside of the country. (http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_…)
The above is called a source. I know it isn't as flashy as throwing about pejoratives but what the hell.
Besides, the issue is first and foremost about Obama's honesty. He claimed that he would be the most transparent administration yet he coneals more of his vital info than any previous president. And instead of wondering about the hypocrisy you drink the cool aid and put on the blinders.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:09 pm
The short-form Certificat of Live Birth, or COLB, that he released can be obtained by people who were born outside of the state of Hawaii or even outside of the country.
Yeah, and it has their place of birth right on it. Obama was born in Honolulu. Crazy ass birther.
The above is called a source. I know it isn't as flashy as throwing about pejoratives but what the hell.
The source of your insanity is the only source you should be worrying about.
Besides, the issue is first and foremost about Obama's honesty.
Yeah right.
He claimed that he would be the most transparent administration yet he coneals more of his vital info than any previous president.
Prove it.
And instead of wondering about the hypocrisy you drink the cool aid and put on the blinders.
By not believing he is a Kenyan/Indonesian/Communist/Fascist/Space Alien usurper? Yeah, I'm the one drinking the kool-aid.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:15 pm
Again, so you are saying that the Republican Governor and the likes of Alito, Thomas, Roberts and Scalia are all in collusion with the “Obama people?”
The Roberts Supreme Court refused without comment to even hear a “birther” case back in December! The Republican Governor of Hawaii verified it's legitimacy!
BTW, in the W case, yes it is far easier to reproduce and pass of unoffical, non certified documents, which was the case with W's sad Military record…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:17 pm
I'm sick of this story for the very reason that even if Obama really was born in Kenya, it doesn't matter. The Constitution does not state that you have to be born on American soil. It just states you have to be a natural born citizen. Obama's mother is an American citizen, so Obama is an American citizen. End of story.
Congress has spoken on that issue, there is no Supreme Court case contradicting that interpretation, and I'm not sure they would ever take such a case on the grounds that either (a) it is a political question and therefore non-justiciable or (b) utterly within Congress's purview to decide as Congress has plenary power over alienage. Obama's mother is an American citizen, so Obama is an American citizen, and has been since the moment he was born. End of story.
And even if I'M wrong about all of that, and 7 more birth certificates come out and the long form in Hawaii is taken out of it's CIA vault all showing that Obama was simultaneously born on 12 different planets, dimensions, and times of history and combined his disparate forms into the Anti-christ and therefore must be removed from office, GUESS WHAT?
Biden is now President, because he's the VP. The Administration's agenda continues unabated. End of story.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:17 pm
This has nothing to do with race. Perhaps you've heard of a little document called the “Constitution”? The people of this country deserve to see proof with their own eyes that thier president is a natural-born citizen and not be asked to blindly trust politicians. All we are asking is to see his long-form birth certificate. In return you call us racists. It is obvious you are the ignorant bigot in this discussion.
Further, in Fukino's 1st statement she said she had verified that a long-form birth certificate is on file but didn't say was information was on it. In her 2nd statement she said that his “vital records” show that he was born in Hawaii, but never used the word birth certificate or long-form birth certificate. This leaves open the possiblity that a long-form exists that contradicts the information on the short form. Given the fact that people born outside of Hawaii can get a Certificate of Life Birth (aka Short form) it seems only logical for there to be questions.
Drink…drink deep from the cool aid of naivety.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:17 pm
This has nothing to do with race. Perhaps you've heard of a little document called the “Constitution”? The people of this country deserve to see proof with their own eyes that thier president is a natural-born citizen and not be asked to blindly trust politicians. All we are asking is to see his long-form birth certificate. In return you call us racists. It is obvious you are the ignorant bigot in this discussion.
Further, in Fukino's 1st statement she said she had verified that a long-form birth certificate is on file but didn't say was information was on it. In her 2nd statement she said that his “vital records” show that he was born in Hawaii, but never used the word birth certificate or long-form birth certificate. This leaves open the possiblity that a long-form exists that contradicts the information on the short form. Given the fact that people born outside of Hawaii can get a Certificate of Life Birth (aka Short form) it seems only logical for there to be questions.
Drink…drink deep from the cool aid of naivety.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:20 pm
Excellent point arowland! And what do we have to show for that Clinton Conspiracy B.S. We got a 4/12 year $100M tax payer funded “hunt' for anything by Kenneth Starr…All this man was able to find in 4 1/2 years was a blowjob! No Whitewater, no travelgate, nothing but a BJ! Starr now admits his personal disdain caused him to do something that was truly detrimental to the U.S. and he would not do it again if given the chance!
BTW, the irony of this all is the Reagan Administration had 27 people in the Admin. convicted of crimes during or after his reign…The Clinton Administration? 0…None…Nada…
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:25 pm
Given the fact that people born outside of Hawaii can get a Certificate of Life Birth (aka Short form)
They can't get one that says they were born in Honolulu, idiot.
it seems only logical for there to be questions.
Birthers know nothing about logic.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:26 pm
Wow, you almost make it fun.
I'll try this again..more slowly this time. A Hawaiian COLB, that states you were born in Hawaii, can be obtained by persons born outside of Hawaii or even the US. And again here is the link to the official Hawaii government website that proves it -
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_…
I assume you want me to prove that he has concealed more vital info that any previous president and not that he made the statement concerning transparency since that was on national television (given your level of intellect and logic, however, I need to cover my bases). Here is a list of the documents he will not release:
Obama's kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.
Bush, McCain, Kerry and Clinton all provided long-form birth certicates during their campaign and there was even a Congressional hearing for McCain but not Obama.
You are an ignorant tool, or maybe a teenager who thinks he's “enlightened”. I've never claimed Obama was born in Kenya. I've simply claimed he hasn't proven he was born in the US which is obviously true from the above source. Keep listening to MSNBC and keep a close on on Chris Matthews leg for any tingles.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:32 pm
one of these days I'll understand why http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcerti… isn't good enough. I know it's his own site, but still. Dead horse (or I guess donkey in this case), stop beating it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:32 pm
A Hawaiian COLB, that states you were born in Hawaii, can be obtained by persons born outside of Hawaii or even the US.
You are a liar. It would state where the person was born. Hawaii would not issue a birth certificate stating someone was born in their state if that person was not.
And again here is the link to the official Hawaii government website that proves it -
Really? Where does it state that the State of Hawaii will lie about your birthplace?
[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]
Bush, McCain, Kerry and Clinton all provided long-form birth certicates
No they didn't. McCain did. That's it. I told you to prove it, by the way.
during their campaign and there was even a Congressional hearing for McCain but not Obama.
There was no congressional hearing, there was a non-binding resolution passed. So what? He was born in Panama. Obama was born in Honolulu.
I've never claimed Obama was born in Kenya.
I never claimed you did.
I've simply claimed he hasn't proven he was born in the US which is obviously true from the above source.
Yes he did. You just can't read and understand what you link to.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:33 pm
Wow…you still don't get it. The Hawaiian statute in question concerns getting a COLB stating that you were born in Hawaii.
The only thing that has to be done is “the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child”.
In plain english, this means that if his parents declared their home to be Honolulu for the year previous to his birth, outside of Hawaii, they can be issues a Hawaiian COLB stating he was born in Honolulu.
Is it starting to creep through that thick skull? This is the reason why most intrastate agencies don't accept the COLB as proof of Hawaiian birth but require the more definitive long-form.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:35 pm
Some insect I know will soon have a problem with black eyes.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:38 pm
The Hawaiian statute in question concerns getting a COLB stating that you were born in Hawaii.
No, it doesn't. You are either too stupid to understand what you are reading or you are lying.
The only thing that has to be done is “the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child”.
They still put the actual place of birth on the certificate, moron.
In plain english, this means that if his parents declared their home to be Honolulu for the year previous to his birth, outside of Hawaii, they can be issues a Hawaiian COLB stating he was born in Honolulu.
No, they can't. Go ahead, call up the Hawaii Department of Health and ask them.
This is the reason why most intrastate agencies don't accept the COLB as proof of Hawaiian birth but require the more definitive long-form.
Any agency in our country would accept Obama's COLB from the State of Hawaii. You are a bad liar.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:45 pm
Let me try to explain since you really do seem to be confused. The Certificate of Live Birth can be obtained for individuals born outside of Hawaii – http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_….
This means if a child is born outside of Hawaii but the parents claim honolulu as their home for the year up unto the birth, they can be issued a COLB stating they were born in Hawaii.
Hawaii has some of the loosest documentation requirements of any state. Even many intra-state agencies won't accept COLB as proof of Hawaiian birth. Instead they require submission of the more accurate long-form.
And it's obvious that your argument lacks substance when all you do is call people racist.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:48 pm
I just figured since you're willing to believe that the State of Hawaii will knowingly put false information on people's birth certificates, you might believe you can punch people through the internet.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:49 pm
Lies. The State of Hawaii will not lie for you and state you were born in the state when you weren't. Garrett is a liar, and a bad one at that (his link doesn't even support his claim).
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:52 pm
Wow, you really are thick.
The point of this statute is that if you declare your “loyalties” to Hawaii, even if you might be travelling when your baby is born he can be registered as a live birth IN HAWAII. They didn't have the natural-born citizen clause of the constitution in mind when they made the rule. They just thought it would be fair to confer Hawaiian birth rights on a child born to “Hawaiian” parents who happened to be out of state at the time of the birth. That meets the qualifications of the state of Hawaii, but not the constitutional qualifications.
That is why it's called a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth. Otherwise it would be called a Hawaiian Certificate of out-of-state birth.
If an individual was issues a COLB under this method, his filed long-form certificate would list his true place of birth.
In turn, I ask you to prove your assertion that Hawaii couldn't be listed as the place of birth. I have provided actual government sources, you have provided juvenile jabbering.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:53 pm
>>BTW, the irony of this all is the Reagan Administration had 27 people in the Admin. convicted of crimes during or after his reign…The Clinton Administration? 0…None…Nada…<<
Another stinkiing LIB LIE of embarrassing proportion. Clinton's first Deputy Atty General, Webster Hubbell, was convicted and incarcerated (after first resigning, naturally). Numerous others would follow him in disgrace. I could readily convey the manifold facts of that case, but an apparent ignoramus such as you should be FORCED to read it for himself You can start by enjoying the link (The A to Z of the Clinton Scandals) I've so helpfully provided. Think nothing of it! :)
http://www.io.com/~cjburke/clinton/clinatoz.html
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:56 pm
And for more evidence from my side (still none from you):
Robert Klein Engler, who writes at Chronwatch-America.com, said he called the State Department to ask about obtaining a U.S. passport with only a “Certification of Live Birth.” and was flat-out told no.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 9:58 pm
Until recently when state officials changed their program, the Hawaiian “homelands” program didn't even accept a “Certification of Live Birth” for its qualifications.
Fact.
Also, they didn't change the policy until it was reported that a COLB wasn't good enough.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:02 pm
You are correct, the state of Hawaii will not lie for you. The true hospital of birth will be listed on the long-form birth certificate. Which is why we want to see it.
Here is the truth about the COLB as stated by Jerry Fuller of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department – “There are some documents that say things that aren't true,” Fuller said. “That's not what's supposed to happen.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:03 am
zeeba,
I’ve seen Orly Taitz in two “Youtube” videos, and she didn’t come across as a “moonbat” to me. Why is it that you and other Obamanuts try to avoid the issues and instead fling insults and names? Do you really think doing so proves your side is right?
And, no, my explanation for the birth announcements was not “convoluted” at all. But instead of actually EXPLAINING in what way my explanation was “convoluted”, you instead resort to comparing it to a 10-year old’s defense of Santa Claus? How incredibly pathetic. Why don’t you try REFUTING the line of reasoning I used? All you have to do is refute JUST ONE of my points. For example, explain why Hawaii would not have accepted the word of a parent of a child, if they had no obvious reason to doubt their word and no obvious recourse to check it for veracity. Or maybe refute my claim that the newspaper birth announcements could be based on potentially false birth records (the falsity deriving from parental lies).
I predict you will not do so, but will instead resort to calling me “loony” or a “moonbat wannabe”, or something. That would be par for the course for you, and for your deluded brethren and sistren who can see no wrong in Obama.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:03 pm
The point of this statute is that if you declare your “loyalties” to Hawaii, even if you might be travelling when your baby is born he can be registered as a live birth IN HAWAII.
Wrong. Why do you lie so much? Ahem:
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.”
The state will not lie for you on the certificate.
The point of this statute is that if you declare your “loyalties” to Hawaii, even if you might be travelling when your baby is born he can be registered as a live birth IN HAWAII. They didn't have the natural-born citizen clause of the constitution in mind when they made the rule. They just thought it would be fair to confer Hawaiian birth rights on a child born to “Hawaiian” parents who happened to be out of state at the time of the birth. That meets the qualifications of the state of Hawaii, but not the constitutional qualifications.
No, the point is for parents to get certificates from the state where they reside, regardless of where the child is born.
If an individual was issues a COLB under this method, his filed long-form certificate would list his true place of birth.
Any COLB issued by the state lists the true place of birth.
In turn, I ask you to prove your assertion that Hawaii couldn't be listed as the place of birth. I have provided actual government sources, you have provided juvenile jabbering.
See above, moron.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:05 pm
Who cares what nutball birthers claim? I know for a fact that the State Department would accept a Hawaiian COLB.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:06 pm
No false information on birth-certificate just on the Certficate of Live Birth.
Come on kids..it's really easy to understand if you try.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:07 pm
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.”
Liar
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:07 pm
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.”
Liar
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:08 pm
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.”
Liar
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:10 pm
Well we agree on one thing. The point of the COLB statute is for parents to get certificates from the state where they reside, regardless of where the child is born.
Add that to this statement about the notorious short-form COLB made by Jerry Fuller of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department.
Fuller said Certificates of Live Birth should reveal the location of the child's birth accurately, but he confirmed there are cases known where that has not happened.
“There are some documents that say things that aren't true,” Fuller said. “That's not what's supposed to happen.”
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:12 pm
Why not just release the long-form and prove we are morons?
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:14 pm
Yep.
Jerry Fuller of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department said Certificates of Live Birth should reveal the location of the child's birth accurately, but he confirmed there are cases known where that has not happened.
“There are some documents that say things that aren't true,” Fuller said. “That's not what's supposed to happen.”
Truther
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:15 am
You’re a loony, but not a moonbat wannabe. You’re full-blown. It akes a
pretty sustained act of will to watch that MSNBC interview with Oily and not
conclude the woman has serious mental health issues.
Look, genius, Obama did a lot of travel as a kid and young man. Which means
he needed a passport. Which means he needed an authorized copy of his birth
certificate to obtain one. Which means that either a) the Hawaii birth
certificate used to obtain that U.S. passport when he was a kid and college
student was valid or b) the plot goes back even further than we feared. I’m
sure you’ll choose B.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:17 pm
Have you researched what is meant by verify in Okubo's above statement? Because the birthers have.
If you were not born in a hospital, the midwife can vouch for you essentially.
Okubo's statement doesn't proclude the possiblity that someone could be born outside of Hawaii and still have a COLB listing Honolulu as place of birth.
Surely someone of your limited logical faculties can see that.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:19 pm
I love how you take it on faith that the state of Hawaii has never made a mistake when listing place of birth on a COLB.
Although, I guess it makes sense. It's so easily verifiable, what, with it's clear date/time/hospital/physician.
Oh wait, I was thinking of an actual birth certificate.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:26 pm
Yep.
Jerry Fuller of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department said Certificates of Live Birth should reveal the location of the child's birth accurately, but he confirmed there are cases known where that has not happened.
“There are some documents that say things that aren't true,” Fuller said. “That's not what's supposed to happen.”
Truther
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:26 pm
Yep.
Jerry Fuller of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department said Certificates of Live Birth should reveal the location of the child's birth accurately, but he confirmed there are cases known where that has not happened.
“There are some documents that say things that aren't true,” Fuller said. “That's not what's supposed to happen.”
Truther
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:28 pm
Nope.
I have documented cases of people trying and being told flat-out no.
Robert Klein Engler, who writes at Chronwatch-America.com, said he called the State Department to ask about obtaining a U.S. passport with only a “Certification of Live Birth.” and was flat-out told no.
Click and read.
or drink and believe.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:29 am
This is a jurisdictional issue and last time I checked, states still have the right to set their own rules about the release of documents in vital statistics. All of these federal court suits will get nowhere. We still have some semblance of states’ rights in this country. And thank God.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:32 pm
Mantis. I do believe you are sincere in your faith of the state of Hawaii, no matter how unfounded. But let me present you with a scenario.
If a child was born outside of a hospital and the family contacts the state of Hawaii and tells them that it was born at home and have a individual to back that up they would be issued a COLB. That COLB would state that the person was born in Hawaii.
However, the long form wouldn't list a hospital. Instead it would have a home birth listed and a statement from a witness included.
Now we have an interesting problem. How to prove to a constitutional level that this person is a natural-born citizen?
Another interesting tidbit. Review both of Fukino's statements about the records that Hawaii has. None of those statements rule out the above possiblity. And it the above possiblity, if we are being honest with ourselves, the baby could really have been born anywhere.
Long-form or drink.
Pingback posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:34 pm
[...] the proof they have is some forged Kenyan ‘birth certificate’ and the word of a street preacher* interviewing via translator Obama’s Kenyan [...]
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:43 pm
This proves nothing! BHO is not human and thus was not born. He is a robot built by the Hollywood Elite in Kenya and programmed to destroy America! Oh, I'm so mad right now I'm slapping my face and jumping up and down like a hefty and mildly-retarded straight man at a Straight Dave cage match!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:46 pm
Like rowland and GOPShares1Brain accurately stated and which you magnificently ignored scion — where are the Clinton convictions? I painfully read through all of that gobbledygook at your pathetic link and I'm still trying to find the convictions? Right-wing GOP inspired/led investigations piled on top of investigations piled on top of more investigations of the Clintons over 8 years. I'll ask you the question again — where are all of the convictions? [crickets chirping]. That's what I thought.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 10:51 pm
I can't image dragging my or any other 18 year old daughter in labor 8000 miles in labor so that
she could give birth in a third world country like Ken Kenya. The would all speak a language that
she would not understand. The care would be inferior to that found in the USA in 1961.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:57 am
Okay, I was right about you. Not that I expected I wouldn’t be, but I just like to point out when I’m right.
“Look, genius,…”
By some measures.
“Obama did a lot of travel as a kid and young man.”
Ooooooo. And to think I wondered if he was truly qualified to be President.
“Which means he needed a passport.”
So if I travel from Indiana to Michigan, I need a passport? Or did you mean to say “Obama did a lot of travel TO OTHER COUNTRIES as a kid and young man”? (I’m being facetious – I know what you meant, but was just pointing out how sloppy you were in what you said.)
“Which means he needed an authorized copy of his birth
certificate to obtain one.”
I thought the Obamanuts have been arguing that a mere “Certification of Live Birth” is sufficient to obtain a passport. I am so confused.
“Which means that either a) the Hawaii birth certificate used to obtain that U.S. passport when he was a kid and college
student was valid or b) the plot goes back even further than we feared.”
Or c) he obtained a U.S. passport using a fraudulent (the fraud perhaps perpetrated by his mother in perhaps falsely claiming he was born in Hawaii when he perhaps was born in Kenya) Certification of Live Birth; or d) he traveled using an Indonesian passport as a young man, perhaps never having renounced his Indonesian citizenship before the age of 21.
“I’m sure you’ll choose B.”
Well, you are wrong once again.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:07 am
Usually, a sentence with an “either” requires an “or” somewhere. You should be careful about calling others stupid when you can barely construct a sentence. Also, receiving is spelled “receiving”. Plus, you’ll want to end your sentence with a period, or perhaps an exclamation point to emphasize how much you’re foaming at the mouth.
As to the general point you are trying to make, I am fairly sure that most Obama supporters don’t work for AIG or Goldman Sachs.
Enjoy life!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:10 am
douglasjbender: The reason Obama can’t “direct” the state of Hawaii to release his original birth record is because the federal government has no jurisdiction over a state in these matters.
If you want to challenge this, then go to Hawaii and sue there. No federal court will touch this case, because it’s not in their jurisdiction. Nor should they, because that would destroy one of the last principles of our system, which is constantly being eroded: states’ rights.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:14 am
You like talking about people’s dead mothers huh? Yours said that’s not how she raised you, at least that’s what she said when her mouth wasn’t full.
So I’m clear, your theory is that somehow Obama’s parents, with little financial resources, traveled to the other side of the planet to give birth, leaving no surviving witnesses or evidence at all? You understand he’s not releasing the original document because he wants people like you to keep talking about this all the way till the 2012 election? Your making conservatives look like nutcases, and liberals around the world are having a great laugh at your expense.
Oh look at how late it got, time to go poke your mom again, I love her non-traditional behaviors and calculating moves!!! I’m just saying, the burden of proof is on you to prove she’s not sitting in my lap right now.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:16 am
Bob Robertson:
“While it is true that parents of a Hawaiian child born at home can ASSERT that their child was born in Hawaii, the “Certificate of Live Birth” (and this may be unique to Hawaiian law), does NOT give the name of the city of birth.”
I believe you mean the “Certification of Live Birth”, which is not the same thing as the “Certificate of Live Birth”. (Although just within the past week or so Hawaii CHANGED the term, so that now what was once called a “Certification of Live Birth” is now called a “Certificate of Live Birth”; I’m not sure if the old “Certificate of Live Birth” has likewise experienced a name change, or has simply been discarded, or what – in any case, the change is clearly intended to confuse the issue, and stall for time.)
But it has been my understanding that BOTH the “Certification of Live Birth” and the “Certificate of Live Birth” indicate the city of birth or the city of CLAIMED birth. If you can provide a reputable reference which indicates otherwise, I’d like to see it.
“It simply says the child was born in the state. Obama’s COLB gives Honolulu as the city, which indicates that this was fact-checked against the long form (the only existing original and cannot be reproduced) in the files.”
The existing original CAN be reproduced, from what I understand. Even if not (which would be so incredibly foolish even for a government agency that even I cannot believe it), I know FOR A FACT that if that long-form exists, ALL of the information on it CAN be accessed using a “Letter of Verification” request.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:21 am
Article 2, Section 1:
“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. ”
Nothing in there says you must be born on U.S. soil as you claim it does.
And you also did not address the point that, even if you’re right and Obama is ineligible and gets removed, that means Biden takes over and will continue doing the exact same things. So what’s the birther end game?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:33 am
Fail.
Lots of women have had abortions. We have proof of that, and many speak openly about it.
You’re completely pulling this Kenyan birth thing out of your ass.
No one, not even Sarah Obama, says it happened.
Laws in existence at the time would have had to have been broken to accomplish it.
Physical endurance not seen this side of Greg LeMond would have been required to get from Kenya to Hawaii in the days before direct flights (3 day journey at least).
Countless officials would have been bribed, and those officials or their relatives would now be unearthed by Sean Hannity.
No pregnant woman has ever participated in a ridiculous 8,000 mile journey without any apparent motive and against all logic and evidence to the contrary. Not to mention doing so without leaving a trace, or without having been stopped by customs officers who don’t want to allow third-world disease to spread to America and thus do not allow undocumented babies from Africa to breeze through without so much as a scrap of paper.
Other than that, yeah, your post was completely non-ridiculous and a well-thought-out piece of non-claptrap that never made me laugh aloud.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:35 pm
Ah, so now you're backing down from your false assertion that the State will issue a birth certificate noting the place of birth as in Hawaii even though the person born elsewhere? Without acknowledging you are wrong? I'm shocked.
And now your argument is that sometimes information can be inaccurate? So what? Do you have reason to believe anything on Obama's COLB is inaccurate? No, you do not.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:36 pm
Garrett,
You're deeply confused. Whatever Jerry Fuller and Robert Klein Engler may have written, the Certificate of Live Birth is exactly what the passport service accepts when they ask for a birth certificate. I know this, because it's what we submitted for my son (born in a military hospital in Honolulu) and my daugher (born in a civilian hospital) submitted in order to get their passports. A Certificate of Live Birth is a birth certificate, and the place designation is for the place of birth, not the residence of the parents. That's why it's called a place of birth, not a residence. This is absolutely clear, and if you work your way through the hawaii.gov website, you'll see all this. There is nothing there about obtaining a certificate of live birth to demonstrate your “loyalty” to Hawaii, and there's no reason why the default option in such a case would be Honolulu, which is a county (like Maui, Kauai and Hawaii), rather than Hawaii, which is the state.
As for the Hawaiian Homelands, you might want to find out what they are, and why a simple birth certificate (long form or short form) would be insufficient for an application.
The fact of the matter is, this is stupid. Obama had his birth certificate on-line last year. It's the copy the State of Hawaii issues to anyone who asks for a copy of their birth certificate. When you ask, you get a copy (not the original) for obvious reasons. Obama's birth certificate shows where and when he was born, and who his parents were. It's the document he would have provided to the U.S. Army if he enlisted, and it's the one his mother submitted to the passport agency to get him a passport before they moved to Indonesia.
None of this matters for the purposes of being a “natural born citizen” because that term doesn't refer to being born in the U.S., just to being a citizen by birth (rather than a naturalized citizen). Thus, George Romney was a natural-born citizen, John McCain was a natural-born citizen (military bases are not American soil), and the children of service-men and -women born in Iraq and Afghanistan are natural-born citizens.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:37 pm
Right, because the existence of out of date info on websites is only accepted by kool-aid drinkers. Got it.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:39 pm
Ok. Here you go:
1. PROOF OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP
a. APPLICANTS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES: Submit a previous U.S. passport or certified birth certificate. A birth certificate must include your full name,
the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such
records.
That's what the State Department requires for a passport. Obama's COLB has all that info. Birther FAIL.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:40 am
Man is that convoluted. I prefer to just go with the fact that the United States Congress ruled that he was eligible to be President when they certified the vote of the Electoral College in January. If they would like to undo that decision, they are free to impeach him and remove him from office upon conviction in the Senate. No judge in any jurisdiction has the authority to do anything about that fact, other than the Chief Justice of the United States, who would sit in judgment at any impeachment trial. But since there is absolutely zero chance of an impeachment, we’ll never see that. I will say it again, Obama could come out tomorrow and admit that he’s the illegitimate son of Patrice Lumumba and Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS, and that she gave birth to him in Josef Mengele’s secret Paraguayan hideaway, and there would be nothing to be done about it until 2012.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:40 pm
I called myself and asked, and they said no problem. Why don't you do the same. And learn to link to something besides the top level of a website. I have no interest in wading through all the birther garbage on that site.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:44 pm
Mantis. I do believe you are sincere in your faith of the state of Hawaii, no matter how unfounded.
Yeah, real unfounded. An official document provided by the state, backed up by newspaper announcements at the time, and the confirmation of the state health director who has seen the original. On the other hand, we have all the birther evidence. Wait, all the birthers have is lies, forgeries, and stupidity. Tough call.
If you birthers had any reason to doubt the document, other than the fact that you don't like the president, I might be curious. You don't, and all the evidence points towards Obama's Honolulu birth. Occam's razor.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:45 pm
the scary part for me is that it looks like my old certificate, including the creases!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:46 pm
“mildly retarded” is an understatement. (and i think you meant caVe match). WAKE UP!!!!!!!
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:47 pm
Facts are totally irrelevant if it doesn't comport their Repuglikkan agenda. Sigh.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:48 am
douglasbjender: With all due respect, I have seen Orly Taitz numerous times in videos and print interviews. I think it’s unfortunate that she had a meltdown during the MSNBC interview, and I give her a pass on that one.
But if you look over her conduct in the entire “eligibility” movement — and I won’t insult her with the “birther” tag — she certainly is pretty flaky.
I don’t have the URL site to present here, but there is a very long article in an Orange County weekly, with long comment fields from experts on both sides who have researched this topic, plus comments from people who know her personally. It took me an entire evening to read. You can Google it.
Orly Taitz immigrated from Israel in the 1980s, and has been practicing as a dentist in Orange County, CA. I don’t where she got her dental training, but I assume it was a legitimate school in Israel. Prior to that she was born and raised in Russia, and like many anti-communist immigrants, she has a deep distrust of socialism, which is understandable. But her recent activity is borderline paranoid. She also has a law degree from an online diploma mill, and she has never won a case, and she’s also a real estate agent? Isn’t that enough careers for one person?
She enlisted Alan Keyes in this fight, and while I think he’s brilliant, he certainly is not mainstream, and is a perennial loser because it’s either his way or the highway. That’s not how you win battles or persuade in a democracy.
Orly is a one woman propagandist who has been known to leave her kids behind and drive to Seattle with her pamphlets, just to try to harrass Chief Justice Roberts in a speech he gave in the state of Washington.
She constantly gets tripped up on the truth and can’t handle herself well in interviews. She may be a leader in the movement, but she’s got some personal emotional issues as well as credibility issues.
The latest Kenya forgery may be her downfall. It has been soundly proven a hoax (she herself said she got it “from an anonymous source”), and while I think this topic is all BS, she’s an embarrassment to the serious researchers like yourself who –while I think you’re wrong –are at least trying to do some reasonable, serious intellectual inquiry.
Orly Taitz by contrast is a loose cannon. The longer she keeps up this paranoid nonsense, the more your movement loses credibility.
Just beware. And read that story in that Orange County paper if you can find it. It’s an eye-opener.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:48 pm
Umm… I think I just woke up. as emily potella would say, “nevermind.” LOLOL.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:49 am
“Little financial resources”? Obama’s father was one of a very few Kenyans who received support to STUDY ABROAD, he in Hawaii. Obama’s father was being groomed to be an economist, and had connections in Kenyan government. And Obama’s mother’s parents were quite well off. (Oh, and by the way, it’s not only his original long-form Birth Certificate that Obama refuses to release – there’s about a page of other relevant information that he conveniently keeps hidden from view, such as practically all of his college and Senate records.)
And as far as Obama’s mother is concerned – what I stated about her is a matter of record, and based on her own testimony and that of her friends, along with her own actions. Note as well that I never said she was a tramp, or anything of the sort.
But I suppose you’re right – I can’t prove that my mother is not sitting on your lap right now. If she is, though, then that would make you a necrophile.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:55 pm
Of course, you're ignorant about citizenship rules. If you were born outside the U.S. before 1986,
you have to have TWO parents of U.S. citizenship to be a citizen. So Obama's mother isn't enough. That's why McCain IS a citizen.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:57 pm
Ever heard of Chester Arthur? Oh yeah, he was James Garfield's VP and became president after Garfield died of a gunshot wound. Seems like his father was born in Ireland and settled in Canada for a while with his Vermont borne wife. There was speculation that Arthur was not born in Vermont, but Canada. He served a full term.
As far as I know I was born in the US, but I have a “certification of live birth” which has always been accepted as my birth certificate. Now when transacting any business that requires an official “birth certificate”, I get from the Bureau of Vital Records a computer generated print out similar to that produced by Obama with a raised seal.
It really calls upon one to suspend reality to believe that Stanley Ann Dunham gave birth anywhere else in the world than Hawaii. By all accounts, she was at least on civil terms with her parents, they had accepted her marriage to an African and accepted her pregnancy. Why travel half way around the world to give birth? Madalyn Dunham appears to have been a practical women: I doubt she would have allowed her only child–daughter–to travel to some village to give birth. And to what purpose? American citizenship–more then than even now–was gold, affording you protection wherever you traveled. Additionally, air travel in the '60s was not as convenient as it is now; there were no direct flights from Nairobi (or Mombasa) to New York or LA. To make such a trip from Africa with a newborn would have been long, arduous and unnecessary.
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 11:58 pm
“they can be issues a Hawaiian COLB stating he was born in Honolulu.”
Sorry, it doesn't say that. It says:
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
They shall issue a certificate. No mention of where it will say the child was born. You're kinda putting words in the mouths of the Hawaiian people to the amount of “we will willfully lie to everyone.”
So, if you find a Hawaiian law about how they determine where the child was born, feel free to submit that. All this talks about is the cert not what the cert SAYS.
And for the record, I was born in the state of Texas. If I ever ran for Pres (not likely), I couldn't prove I was born in Texas. I could only prove I was adopted in Texas on 8 August 19XX. All records regarding my birth and adoption (except for the registration of live birth and adoption by my parents) is sealed . . . even (and especially) from me. Nevermind the American people and their “right to know.” I get this reliably from many Texas Bar registered lawyers and State and Federal Judges practicing in the state of Texas. I'll give you three guesses what my step-father did for decades. The first two don't count.
And for what its worth, we're a Republic who does not directly elect our president. The founding fathers didn't trust the “masses.” So about that “right” of the American people to make up their own minds by seeing for themselves. . . not really supported by what the founding fathers wrote about their ideas on the Constitution.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:01 am
No birther besides Orly Taitz is claiming that Obama’s mother posted those birth announcements, you mean?
Because Orly Taitz clearly said that she did. She said that to David Shuster yesterday on MSNBC. Where the hell have you been?
She accused Obama’s mom of posting those birth announcements because Obama’s mom wanted to avoid going through immigration and paying immigration fees, and to help her get on welfare.
No word from Orly about how any of this would have worked, let alone any proof that Obama’s mom was actually on welfare.
But before you get indignant, you’d better check with your movement’s Queen Bee.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:05 am
If you were born outside the U.S. before 1986, you have to have TWO parents of U.S. citizenship to be a citizen.
Wrong. Stop believing what birther websites tell you.
Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock: A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) INA provided the citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.
Some may claim that Obama doesn't qualify because his mother had not lived for 5 years after the age of fourteen, but that is a technicality based on the fact that she was not alive for five years between turning fourteen and her son's birth (she gave birth at age eighteen), and she wouldn't be held to that requirement. This only matters for people born outside the U.S., however, and since Obama was born in Hawaii, it's a moot point.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:13 am
That seal at the top of the purported BC doesn't look like that of either Australia or the State of South Australia. The right-wing sites are saying *this* is fake.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:27 am
Nice lie. PROVE your claim “but that is a technicality based on the fact that she was not alive for five years between turning fourteen and her son's birth…AND SHE WOULDN'T BE HELD TO THAT REQUIREMENT”.
Obama has NOT YET PROVEN that he was born in Hawaii, because the only evidence he has provided has been likely forged documents which, even if not forged, could have been given to infants who were not born in Hawaii. At the time of his birth, Hawaii allowed the parents of children not born in hospitals to simply ASSERT where and when the child was born, and if there was no possibility of verifying the claim was evident, a “Certification of Live Birth”, or a “Certificate of Live Birth” minus pertinent information on that form, was granted. Thus, a parent could simply LIE about the place and time of the birth of their child, and a “Certification of Live Birth” (or equivalent) would be granted; this would also result in birth announcements in the newspapers, so those don't prove anything either.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:31 am
Well, if right-wing sites are saying it, it must be true!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:31 am
Oh, bullwinkle. Very, very few of those seeking for Obama to release his original long-form birth certificate are “lunatics”, and seeking for him to release his original long-form birth certificate is far from “nutty” or “foolish”. Good grief, you liberals are incredibly blind and trusting. One would think you would argue that a legitimate reason Obama doesn't release any of the relevant records from his past is simply because he doesn't want people to realize he's a god.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:34 am
mantis,
“Ah, so now you're backing down from your false assertion that the State will issue a birth certificate noting the place of birth as in Hawaii even though the person born elsewhere?”
No, he wasn't. Can't you read?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:35 am
kpmk,
First, whether Robert Klein Engler was refused a passport with these credentials is not up for public vote. It is a fact.
Second, I'm not contending that Honolulu is the default option. I was using Honolulu as an example since that is where Obama's COLB lists as place of birth. The point is this. If you lived in Hawaii but had a child outside of the country you could obtain a Hawaiian COLB saying you were born in Hawaii. This is the scenario:
A child is born outside of Hawaii and the parents return and request a COLB listing a home birth. All they needed according to Hawaiian law in 1961 was their own word and the word of a midwife or other witness. That's it…the word of 3 individuals would allow you to get a Hawaiian COLB listing Honolulu (used as an example in this instance due to the fact that Obama's COLB lists Honolulu) as your place of birth. However, the long-form vault copy would not list a hospital or physician. Rather it would be listed as a home birth with the statements of both parents and the witness included. Disprove this with applicable 1961 Hawaiian law if you think you can.
Your statement on the Hawaiian Homelands is strange considering they accepted long-form birth certificates prior to 2 months ago and now accept short-form. Note: They added the short-form as acceptable verification after a news artcle was released noting that the short-form wasn't even sufficient for Hawaiian Homelands.
You assertion about the online birth certificate is again half truths. He has posted a COLB which I have shown above has shortcomings.
As far as Indonesia, it is ineteresting you brought it up since Indonesia was on the no-fly list for US citizens at the time Obama travelled there. Anyone using an American passport would not be allowed to travel there.
Your comparison between McCain and Romney's situation and Obama's is disengenious. Both of McCain and Romney's parents were american citizens. Obama's father was a Kenyan citizen therefore the requirements for “natural born citizen” are more difficult for Obama. He had to be born on US soil.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:36 am
That's the one of the most racist and ignorant things I've ever read. And I'm referring to your opinion about “birthers”, not the motto you (falsely) claim is theirs.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:39 am
douglasjbender: Obama has sealed his records? That’s news to me. He won’t release his transcripts, because he doesn’t have to and it would prove nothing about his citizenship.
My brother lives in Hawaii, and there’s a great pidgin’ expression, there, “Got beef?”
You don’t like how Linda Lingle is a Republican governor in an overwhelmingly Democratic state, and she also vouches for the birth certificate? Then go to Hawaii and sue the state, because the federal government, and even Obama himself, has no jurisdiction over Hawaii vital records. That’s why Orly Taitz and crew will lose every time, as they already have, 43 times, in federal courts.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:40 am
That's “disingenuous”. But a skunk by any other name…. (Referring to those who either cannot or will not confront sound reasoning, as exemplified by the lemmings defending Obama here.)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:41 am
I had a feeling I spelled that wrong as I was typing it. :-)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:41 am
“You stay classy. And racist.”
You have difficulty recognizing subtle sarcasm, don’t you?
“So now we can add ‘cannot stay on topic’ to ‘racist.’ ”
One, Obama’s ruining the country with debt and socialism is more “on topic” (in addressing rhonda’s insinuation, at least) than racism. Two, it has been those on YOUR side who have been fairly consistently bringing up the racism issue. And, no, I am not a racist. My “halfbreed” comment was merely a shorthand for “Mostly Arabic” – “halfbreed” fit more fluidly in my sarcastic mockery of rhonda’s post better than “Mostly Arabic”. For instance, compare “Thar’s a White Arabic-halfbreed in the White House….” with “Thar’s a White Mostly-Arabic-on-his-father’s-side man in the White House….”
“After all, what the hell does George Bush’s economy have to do with Obama’s birth certificate?”
Nothing. But it is now OBAMA’S “economy”, and HIS “government”, and he is ruining both. But my quoted comment was in the context of responding to rhonda’s which insinuated that the REASON many are asking that Obama provide his records is because of racism – I pointed out that there is a far simpler and more reasonable reason, one which involves STRONG DISAGREEMENT with his policies. Does that make sense now, or do I need to spell it out more clearly?
“Unless you mean that you didn’t understand the U.S. was a debtor nation with a progressive tax rate before Obama even announced his candidacy. Is that what you mean?”
Nope. I just meant that he is putting us so far and so quickly into such greater debt that it is unlikely we or our children or our grandchildren will ever see the light of not being a debtor nation. Do you know the difference between owing, say, $5000 on one credit card and owing $500,000 on 10 credit cards? (An extreme and unrealistic example, but sometimes hyperbole is needed to get through to those who are having trouble grasping a concept.)
“I hope not. I’d hate to have to add ‘ignoramus’ to ‘racist’ and ‘can’t stay on topic.’ ”
Me too. But I’m afraid I already have discerned you as “incredibly judgmental”, “unjustifiably self-impressed”, and “hopelessly undiscerning and biased”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:41 am
Hardly. Are you blind? The creases do not match.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:45 am
God, you are dense. Unless you believe the Republican administration in Hawaii is *also* in on the conspiracy, then their corroborating statements confirm that Obama's COLB — the one he released before the election — is real and accurate. If his original birth certificate says he was born somewhere other than Honolulu then the COLB would also say so.
If the COLB was a fake, the Hawaiian govt would not perjure themselves by lying to cover up for someone they likely didn't even vote for.
Even if, somehow, Obama's parents lied and managed to cover up the fact that their son was not born on American soil, then there is nothing anyone can do to prove it today. Any birth certificate still in the archives would simply confirm the Honolulu birth place. In fact, if it's all a lie, there is a good chance that Obama himself doesn't know it. Why would his parents ever want to involve him in their criminal actions?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:46 am
Commieatheist, the question is whether the seal is correct, period. It wouldn't be true because rightwing sites say so, but they're saying so doesn't prove it's false either since they will use some facts (very often not, I agree.) It being the correct seal is an independent fact to discover, neither because of affirmation nor in spite of it.
BTW Happy birthday to Barack Obama today, whom I believe was born in Hawaii.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:46 am
Garrett: “A Hawaiian COLB, that states you were born in Hawaii, can be obtained by persons born outside of Hawaii or even the US.”
mantis: “You are a liar. It would state where the person was born. Hawaii would not issue a birth certificate stating someone was born in their state if that person was not.”
Garrett: “And again here is the link to the official Hawaii government website that proves it -
mantis: “Really? Where does it state that the State of Hawaii will lie about your birthplace?”
Amazing. Are you really that dense, mantis? For goodness' sake, Garrett has made it perfectly clear that it would be the PARENTS who would be lying to the HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT. The point remains that a child could be born in another country, that child's parents could then LIE to the Hawaiian government about that child being born in Hawaii, and that child would then be granted a Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” (or something equivalent).
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:48 am
Belief is not the same as knowledge. There are some who require a little more from their leaders than merely “Trust me”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:05 am
tacitus,
“God, you are dense.”
Highly unlikely.
“Unless you believe the Republican administration in Hawaii is *also* in on the conspiracy, then their corroborating statements confirm that Obama's COLB — the one he released before the election — is real and accurate.”
Ever heard of Arlen Specter? Once, he was a Republican. Then, he had a revelation and became a Democrat. However, other Republicans have also affirmed that they trust that Obama's COLB is legitimate, yet NONE of them have actually taken the time to VERIFY that it is – they have simply taken two non-independent websites' word for it, and superficially examined the issue. The same could easily be true for “the Republican administration in Hawaii”, WITHOUT their “corroborating statements” implying they are involved in any sort of “conspiracy”.
“If his original birth certificate says he was born somewhere other than Honolulu then the COLB would also say so.”
Ummmmm, speaking of “dense”, haven't you been reading what we “birthers” have been saying? Obama's original long-form Birth Certificate MIGHT simply indicate that he was not born in a hospital, which would LEAVE OPEN the possibility that he was born in another country (and would indicate that he has lied in many instances about his being born in two hospitals in Hawaii [it seems that he changed his mind recently about which one he was actually born in]).
“If the COLB was a fake, the Hawaiian govt would not perjure themselves by lying to cover up for someone they likely didn't even vote for.”
Even if the Hawaiian government self-identifies as “Republican”, their views are likely “moderate”, and so they could be easily convinced to vote for “one of their own” (someone perhaps born in, and raised in, Hawaii). Ever heard of some Democrats having voted for Reagan? Or some Republicans having voted for Clinton? It happens.
“Even if, somehow, Obama's parents lied and managed to cover up the fact that their son was not born on American soil, then there is nothing anyone can do to prove it today.”
No one that I know of has claimed otherwise. But you are completely missing the point, which I will not repeat here.
“Any birth certificate still in the archives would simply confirm the Honolulu birth place.”
It wouldn't necessarily “confirm” it; it would perhaps only REPEAT it. (In the case where Obama was claimed to have had a “home birth”.)
“In fact, if it's all a lie, there is a good chance that Obama himself doesn't know it.”
And there's a good chance that he DOES know it. Which would explain why he would be so reticent to reveal any of his relevant records from his past.
“Why would his parents ever want to involve him in their criminal actions?”
It would only take ONE of his parents – his mother. And if you know anything about Obama's parents, you would know that NONE of them exhibited anything like real parental love towards him. His supposed father (B.H.O Sr.) apparently abandoned him and his mother, and did not seek him out for years (at which point he met with him for perhaps a day or two, then left him, not to see him again for years, or even ever). His mother abandoned him to be cared for by his grandparents, so that she could study in Washington state (rather than enrolling in a university in Hawaii, or taking him with her); and when she returned with him from Indonesia when he was in grade school, she not long thereafter abandoned him again, leaving him with her parents while she became a sort of “world-traveler” (or at least a country-hopper). He was raised by his grandparents, EVEN THOUGH HIS MOTHER WAS PERFECTLY ABLE TO DO SO.
His mother was also quite the controversial and liberal figure, one who rejected traditional standards and behaviors. She gravitated towards the revolutionary and rebellious, and was both herself. After Obama reached a certain age, there is nothing to suggest that she wouldn't have told him the truth about his birth and father (if what is now being presented by Obama is a lie), and then told him to keep it a secret. She, like Barack, was ambitious and calculating, after all.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:10 am
Is that the same Snopes.com that changed the details on Obama’s place of birth and even the hospital several times in a few hours and then finally said
there was no official record of where he was born? You can get your “facts” anywhere you want, and “factcheck.com” is a creation of the Clintons (check
it out anywhere you choose). Personally, I’m waiting for the sealed records to be opened and examined. Everything else is speculation. What is Mr.
“Transparency” hiding? What will his devotees have to worship in his Presidential Library if he never releases anything?
================================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:11 am
I beg to differ. The Panama Canal Zone was leased land. It has also been argued that McCain was born in a hospital in Colon (not sure without looking it up. It is on his birth certificate). According to what I read, that hospital is not in the Canal Zone. I admit I have not looked at the issue in depth as I believe McCain could easily argue his parentage gives him Natural Born status.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:12 am
And I can't imagine some women having their babies aborted. Especially those who have done so in back alleys, or by individuals who are not doctors. Some people do things most people wouldn't.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:14 am
I should also mention that the reason that “leased land” is significant is that the Bush Administration argued that leased land (Gitmo specifically) was not US territory (so that they could do whatever they wanted to prisoners there and not have to worry about the pesky rule of law and all of that mess).
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:14 am
The statute you listed talks about citizenship, not natural-born citizenship status as required by the Constitution to occupy the office of President. This is a completely unique requirement created specifically for one job in the Constitution. There are many paths to citizenship via naturalization and other means, but that doesn't make one a “natural born citizen”.
Claiming that the law wouldn't be followed in the case of Obama's mother is absurd. Show me in the law where it says this requirement would be waved if you were not alive for 5years before turning 14 and the birth of the child. You have basically decided to overrule state law because it is convenient to your argument.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:16 am
These claims must be backed by some form of evidence. Do you have any?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:17 am
Don't be silly. Belief is all you'll ever have, unless you train yourself in document forensics, fly to Hawaii and travel back in time to when the BC was written.
In the meantime, I assume you “believe” the Hawaiian COLB is a forgery? Funny how belief works.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:18 am
All the more reason for Obama to release his records. Oh, the humanity! Look at the grief he is causing in the lives of innocent people half a world away.
Show us the documents, Mr. “Transparency”.
=====================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:19 am
Hey, Barry, yeah, Barry Soretoro, unseal those records, please, Matt here wants to see what you’re hiding.
=====================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:19 am
So Garrett, which statute does talk about natural born citizenship?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:20 am
Tacitus,
You are confused on the argument. If Obama was born out of Hawaii and his parents wanted to acquire a COLB showing Hawaii as the birthplace they only needed to declare that it was a home birth and have 1 witness.
This would result in a COLB that listed Hawaii as place of birth. However, the long-form would show no hospital or physician but instead would list a home birth. Included with the document would be the statements of both parents and either a midwife or witness.
Under this circumstance, none of the statements that Hawaiian gov't has made would be incorrect if you look at them closely. The first statement confirmed that Obama had a long-form BC on file but didn't mention what was on it. The 2nd statement mentioned his “vital records” show he was born in Hawaii but they don't mention long-form or even birth certificate for that matter.
If the long-form vault copy has a hospital and attending physician listed than there is no argument…Obama is a natural-born citizen.
Just release it and be done with all of this.
My guess is that his long-form lists a home birth, which would prove nothing either way. It would however raise many more questions which Obama would want to avoid.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:23 am
TEWS_Pilot: Have you even been reading this thread (and I agree it’s getting jumbled chaotically).
I said the Aussie had his birth certificate up for years on a genealogy website. He is not involved in any conspiracy nonsense, and wishes it never happened. What’s more to say on this matter, except that a forger used it as a template for Kenya?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:24 am
Hawaii changed the term from Certificate of Live Birth to Certification of Live Birth because they changed their system. The Short Form Birth Certificate is generated automatically from a database and contains all of the information necessary for “all reasonable purposes” to establish Hawaiian birth.
Since Hawaii no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth, it would be idiotic to require them for proof of birth. Some of their old documents that birthers erroneously relied on have now been changed to reflect the current situation.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:25 am
So, you could have just said you don’t like America’s election of a black president. Why beat around the bush?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:25 am
That is exactly what Obama and the Marxists who are now running this country want you to do. Don’t give up, make THEM give up.
=============================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:26 am
Obama ran as “the first AFRICAN-American” President, NOT “the first “ARABIC-American” President. You tell me how he would have fared if he had done the latter.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:30 am
You accept everything posted on Snopes.com and Moveon.org and Factcheck.com and Huffingtonpost and Democrat Underground and Daily KOS and
every other Leftist blog and the constant stream of lies and misinformation and stonewalling and obfuscation coming out of the White House and
“Mainstream” Media propaganda machine and yet you demand evidence from ME? Are you nuts? Unseal your records, Mr. “Transparency”.
========================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:31 am
Translation: “I have no answer for your points. Therefore, you must be a racist.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:34 am
Bob, we’re talking past each other. Someone forged something. The Aussie may well be a victim of “identity theft” in a manner of speaking. He is not
considered a willing participant in a conspiracy as far as I know, although he may be accused of being naive for allowing his birth certificate to be made public
in this day and age. I just pointed out some of the repercussions that may result from what has happened; I did not assess any blame or accuse him of
anything.
====================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:38 am
What stupid question? About how a 4-year old site just happened to be in place for a fake BC? I would consider it stupid to *believe* that. Nor do I have any idea what you mean about “wanting to get the truth”. It seems to me you’re doing your level best to *avoid* the truth.
And again, WHERE did Bomford give permission?
Pingback posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:43 am
[...] And let us not forget that the birth certificate appears to have actually been issued in Australia. [...]
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:49 am
Bob Robertson,
“Obama has sealed his records? That’s news to me.”
Whether he himself has “officially” sealed any of them, or whether he simply refuses to release them, the effect is the same – they are “sealed” to the public.
“He won’t release his transcripts, because he doesn’t have to and it would prove nothing about his citizenship.”
It is not just his transcripts, I don’t think, but also his associations and “published” papers, or course papers. These papers might reveal quite a bit about the “formative” Obama. But some of the “sealed” information from his college years includes things that MIGHT indicate if he received a scholarship as a foreign student, which would result in his being disqualified as President. Certainly motivation for him to NOT release those records, if true. But we can’t know if that’s the reason, because he WON’T release those records.
“My brother lives in Hawaii, and there’s a great pidgin’ expression, there, ‘Got beef?’ ”
I live in Indiana, and there’s an expression made famous in a “Wendy’s” television commercial from a number of years ago: “Where’s the beef?” And I think that applies most definitely to Obama and his past, and his claims about his life (as made in his TWO self-aggrandizing autobiographies).
“You don’t like how Linda Lingle is a Republican governor in an overwhelmingly Democratic state, and she also vouches for the birth certificate?”
Did it ever occur to you that she couldn’t have become a Republican governor in an “overwhelmingly Democratic state” UNLESS she was quite moderate in her Republicanism? Has it not occurred to you that she might have some pro-Obama bias simply because she is Hawaiian (I assume) and Obama was supposedly born in Hawaii, and largely raised in Hawaii, and that that bias might easily be sufficient to overcome whatever “anti-Democrat” leanings she may or may not have?
“Then go to Hawaii and sue the state, because the federal government, and even Obama himself, has no jurisdiction over Hawaii vital records.”
I have absolutely NEVER said or implied that Obama would have the FEDERAL authority to order the Hawaiian government to go against their own laws in this matter. And I have never suggested that he use his authority AS PRESIDENT to force the release of his vital records.
“That’s why Orly Taitz and crew will lose every time, as they already have, 43 times, in federal courts.”
No, that’s not the reason, I’m fairly sure. Besides, there is a very simple way for Obama to have at least the INFORMATION on his original long-form Birth Certificate (if it exists, and is not merely a “short-form” Certification or something similar) released. Do you know how he could do so?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:59 am
Oh? Then why are their leaders all certified moonbats like Oily Tatz – you'd
think if there was some reservoir of sanity within the movement, it would
rise to the top. But it hasn't, and there isn't.
Oily stumbled all over herself for four minutes the other day trying to
avoid an interviewer's very reasonable question about how she accounts for
the fact that Obama's birth announcement appeared in two local newspapers
the week after he was born. In fact, I've never heard any response from the
birthers that attempts to explain how these could exist if he wasn't born in
Hawaii.
When dealing with crackpots, the classic and classy response is to refuse
to engage them in debate, because they're never satisfied with any answer
you provide. That's all Obama is doing here. And that's why this will be my
last comment on this thread.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:01 am
The entire birth certificate “issue” is merely a smokescreen to hide the fact that, even if Obama was indeed born on U.S. soil (in which case he would be considered a *native-born* U.S. citizen), he has never been nor can he ever be a NATURAL-born U.S. citizen SIMPLY BECAUSE HIS (alleged) FATHER WAS A U.K. CITIZEN (of Kenyan birth) AT THE TIME OF OBAMA “JR.’s” BIRTH, rendering Obama Jr. at least a British citizen, and if in fact he was born on U.S. soil, then by the 14th amendment ALSO (read “dual”) a NATIVE-born U.S. citizen. Birth on U.S. soil ALONE is NOT ENOUGH for “Natural-born” status. Both your PARENTS must have been U.S. citizens at the TIME of your birth on U.S. soil.
The writers of the Constitution, most of whose parents held dual citizenship with Britain, rendering these writers NEVER to acquire ‘Natural-born’ status regardless of whether they, themselves, were born within the Colonies, wrote themselves INTOeligibility as presidential candidates in Article 2, Section 1, precisely because they intended that theirs be the ONLY generation of presidential candidates eligible to run as an EXCEPTION to the commonplace understanding that “Natural-born” meant and still means a birth on U.S. soil to at least a FATHER (at that time, the mother’s citizenship was not consequential) who was, at the time of the baby’s birth, a U.S. CITIZEN.
Article 2, Sec. 1, U.S. Constitution:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President …”
Leo Donofrio’s treatment:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12…
The Federalist Papers
By P.A. Madison on November 18, 2008
http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_c…
Citizen at Birth (CAB) does NOT equal Natural Born Citizen (NBC) – Mario Puzzo, Esq.
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/citizen-at-bi…
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:02 am
Until recently Hawaii did NOT accept a Certification of Live Birth as proof a person was actually born in Hawaii for all government uses. For example, Hawaii’s Department of Home Lands required the person to bring their Certificate of Live Birth in. Because their Certification of Live Birth was insufficient proof to demonstrate the person was actually born in Hawaii.
Here is a link to the above example:
http://ngoldfarb.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/state-of-hawaii-says-obama-birth-certificate-not-valid/
The problem you have is you keep using COLB to reference two different documents. Which, I assume at this point is intentional obfuscation on your part.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:09 am
Ouch, good point about Orly. On the other hand, Robard accusing a dentist/laywer of criminal activity might not be wise either. Some might call it slander.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:10 am
Why are you asking me? Barack Obama sealed the records that will answer all the questions; ask HIM. The only “truth” I am interested in is WHO is
Barack Obama? Really. Not who is the facade we see 24/7 on TV still campaigning long after the election is over, but WHO is the REAL Barack Obama.
Granted the Aussie’s BC has been verified. Granted it was naively posted publicly with no restrictions against downloading copies of it where anyone in
the world with good or bad motives could misuse it. Who cares? The topic under discussion is the Kenyan BC, and a case has now been filed to
determine its origin, its meaning, its purpose, was it created recently or decades ago to be used by Obama to apply fraudulently to Occidental College, or
any number of other questions you care to add to the stack. It’s not that hard to understand. Please don’t attribute motives or ideas to me that are not
mine. Do YOU care if the President of the United States of America is legally eligible to hold the office and if he is POSSIBLY a fraud or a liar, either NOW
or when he applied for admission to Occidental College? Do you care if he LIED and committed FRAUD on his application? Do you care if he meets the
legal qualifications to hold the office of POTUS? Do you agree that the American people have a right to know the TRUTH? THAT is the issue. Just
unseal the records and let the truth be known.
=================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:13 am
“Disprove this with applicable 1961 Hawaiian law if you think you can.”–Garrett
Lol. You are reversing the burden of proof. It is YOUR claim, YOU need to cite the applicable Hawaiian law as it was written in 1961 that supports your argument – if you think you can.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:14 am
zeeba,
“Oh? Then why are their leaders all certified moonbats like Oily Tatz – you'd think if there was some reservoir of sanity within the movement, it would rise to the top. But it hasn't, and there isn't.”
Orly Taitz is no “moonbat”. And neither is Alan Keyes, or Philip Berg, or Joseph Farah, or Lou Dobbs. Why are all of Obama's defenders certifiably cultic and clueless?
“Oily stumbled all over herself for four minutes the other day trying to avoid an interviewer's very reasonable question about how she accounts for the fact that Obama's birth announcement appeared in two local newspapers the week after he was born. In fact, I've never heard any response from the birthers that attempts to explain how these could exist if he wasn't born in Hawaii.”
I rather doubt your account of that interview. But if you had done even a very simple search on the issue you raise, you'd have quickly realized that “birthers” have ALREADY explained how those two birth announcements in those two Hawaiian newspapers could exist if he wasn't born in Hawaii. The explanation is simply that those birth announcements were BASED ON either a Certification of Live Birth (or its equivalent) or a Birth Certificate – if Obama was NOT born in a hospital in Hawaii (and thus perhaps born even in another country), then the birth announcements would have been based on a Certification of Live Birth (or its equivalent), and would thus merely be REPEATING information which could be false. That is, if Obama was born in, say, Kenya, and his mother shortly after his birth returned to Hawaii and applied for a Certification of Live Birth (or its equivalent) in Hawaii, and she claimed that he was born in Hawaii, the Hawaiian government would have trusted her claim and granted Barack a “Certification of Live Birth” (or its equivalent). That (false) information about where he was born would then be REPEATED in the birth announcements, because those announcements were BASED ON the false information contained in the “Certification of Live Birth” (or its equivalent), which would have been the only information on file regarding Obama's birth.
Do you finally understand?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:19 am
It appears that some of those seeking the release of Obama's sealed records have a different slant on the plethera of fraudulent birth certificates surfacing these days. One theory is that at least one may have been created by or for Obama himself when he applied to Occidental College…as a FOREIGN EXCHANGE STUDENT! …and a case has been filed to have the FBI and DOJ investigate the source of the suspect birth certificates with that premise in mind. This could be a “smoking gun” no one thought about in the “birther” camp, but it would be just as damaging. What would happen if it is proven that Obama fraudulently applied for and was accepted at Occidental College, and all that has accrued to him as a result of the educational credentials he received? Would he be stripped of any or all of his credentials, and could he be arrested and sent to prison….or has the statute of limitations expired? What if he falsified his citizenship or birth information on a passport? Prosecution may no longer be an option, but stripping him of his fraudulently-obtained credentials is still in play…look at all the “phony soldiers”, “respected journalists”, “tenured educators”, and other public figures who have been exposed and stripped of those credentials and honors……drip, drip, drip….
…but the nighmare scenario that followed would be a Constitutional crisis of monumental proportions…would impeachment hearings be in order? How would the ascention to POTUS be handled? Would there be riots?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:22 am
Garrett,
Discussing Hawaiian Homelands is a non-sequitur. The reason Hawaiian Homelands requested the long-form at one time was to establish the birthplaces and background of the parents. The additional information was not necessary to prove birth, but rather GENEALOGY. The Hawaiian Homelands website explains this:
http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/dhhl…
“The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) and Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth. The Certificate of Live Birth generally has more information which is useful for GENEALOGICAL purposes as compared to the Certification of Live Birth which is a computer-generated printout that provides specific details of a person’s birth. Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:25 am
Fake. Pure and simple. 1) We are suppose to believe this piece of paper is approximately the same age as the original. Yet there is no discoloration or aging of the “Obama” paper. It looks like the paper was recently folded. This page doesn't look like it ever traveled in a wallet, whereas the original looks like it did many times. The only reason to fold paper up like this is to carry it in a wallet. 2) There is a weird pattern behind all text and logos on the “Obama” paper, a tell tale sign that text was copied and pasted then skewed to fit the photo of the crisp paper. I could see how a non-graphics professional might be fooled by such thing, but take it from someone who has spent more than a decade faking photos for the advertising industry, this “Obama” paper is a fake.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:29 am
“Do YOU care if the President of the United States of America is legally eligible to hold the office and if he is POSSIBLY a fraud or a liar”
Quite frankly, I expect that every President we’ve had (or ever will have) is both fraud and liar to some degree. I feel certain that some deception was involved in the run-up to Iraq, for example.
HOWEVER, regarding the specific eligibility issue, of course I care. However, the chances of there being this huge and nefarious (not to mention 40-year old) conspiracy is as unlikely as a meteor killing me dead in the next 30 seconds.
I don’t worry about meteors, and consequently I see no cause for alarm in this instance.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:34 am
Not to jump on a bandwagon here but Orly Taitz is clearly a moonbat. If you can't see that then there is no trying to have a rational discussion with you.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:35 am
ps – do your own simple search and watch the interview for yourself – it's
been all over the net for the past 24 hours or so.
and do you realize just how convoluted your explanation for the birth
announcements sounds? It's like a developmentally challenged 10-year-old
desperately trying to explain how he just *knows* there really, truely is a
Santa Claus.
And Alan Keyes isn't a moonbat? You have a rich fantasy life, don't you?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:36 am
The link you posted has Dr. Fukino (not the Governor and not the State as a body) saying the following:
+++”"I … have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen,” Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said in a brief statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”"+++
No where does it say the State of Hawaii or the Republican Governor have stated Obama was Born in Hawaii.
The Director of Health for Hawaii does make that statement, but that has already been challenged because of time-line and the records being disposed of.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:38 am
I have Obama's real birth certificate which I will sell to the highest bidder at the end of this week.
Please post your bid accordingly.
View Obama's real birth certificate here,…….
http://westernfrontamerica.com/wp-content/uploa…
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:40 am
“You assertion about the online birth certificate is again half truths. He has posted a COLB which I have shown above has shortcomings.”–Garrett
No you have not. You should say you “think” you have shown above…
The State of Hawai'i has stated a COLB is good enough to prove citizenship for “all reasonable purposes”. We can believe them or we can believe you. Unfortunately, you are not an official with the state.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:41 am
You mean, if he had done either.
He most certainly didn’t run as the “First African-American” anything. If anything he ran from that label.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:42 am
It appears that some of those seeking the release of Obama's sealed records have a different slant on the plethera of fraudulent birth certificates surfacing these days. One theory is that perhaps this one may have been created by or for Obama himself when he applied to Occidental College…as a FOREIGN EXCHANGE STUDENT! …and a case has been filed to have the FBI and DOJ investigate the source of at least this one with that premise in mind. What better template to clone from than a UK birth certificate for Obama's fake UK birth certificate from a different part of the extended kingdom? This could be a “smoking gun” no one thought about in the “birther” camp, but it would be just as critical for exposing Obama as a fraud and a liar. If he IS a US citizen and applied as a foreign exchange student to attend Occidental College, he committed fraud. If he is NOT a US citizen and now claims he IS, then he is still a liar and a fraud. Were you lying THEN, or are you lying NOW, Mr. Obama?
What would happen if it is proven that Obama fraudulently applied for and was accepted at Occidental College, and all that has accrued to him as a result of the educational credentials he received from that school and all subsequent schools? What if he fraudulently applied for his passport to visit Pakistan? Would he be stripped of any or all of his credentials, and could he be arrested and sent to prison….or has the statute of limitations expired? Prosecution may no longer be an option, but stripping him of his fraudulently-obtained credentials is still in play…look at all the “phony soldiers”, “trusted journalists”, “tenured educators”, “esteemed members of Congress” and other public figures who have been exposed and stripped of credentials and honors…”Hope” and “Change”….drip, drip, drip….
…but the nighmare scenario that followed would be a Constitutional crisis of monumental proportions. Would impeachment hearings be in order? How would the ascention to POTUS be handled now? Would there be riots? Where is the “transparency” promised during the campaign? The only “Change” being implemented is changing gears from “Forward” to “Reverse” and deconstructing the economy, the housing industry, the healthcare industry, the banking industry, the mortgage financing industry, the investment banking industry, the insurance industry, the automobile and manufacturing industries, the energy industry, the moral and social structure, the military preparedness, and the “Hope” we enjoyed before the Alinskyites took control of the government.
Mr. Obama, Oh Grand Mufti of Chicago, unseal your records.
Meet the new boss; same as the old boss…..
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:47 am
Opey: The constitution does not require that one's parents have to be citizens in order for a candidate to be “natural born”. Slaves were not “citizens” in the true sense of the world, but under the 14th amendment, their children were. Illegal immigrants are not citizens, but their children born here will qualify as natural-born and thus eventually run for the presidency.
There have been over 43 court challenges to date, including from some of the individuals you have mentioned. All have lost or been thrown out.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:54 am
delver: The state seals of many of the Commonwealth countries changed during the 1960s, as many countries gained their independence, or at least acquired an identity which distanced itself from the crown colony status.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:54 am
EVERYTHING anyone does or accepts hinges on a foundational belief of some sort. In that sense, sure, “belief is all [I'll, or anyone'll] ever have”. But at a certain, evidential, level, belief can turn into knowledge – knowledge of mathematics, or of document forensics, and the like. At this level, the facts and evidence suggest strongly that Obama has something to hide. What that is is uncertain, and will likely remain so UNLESS OBAMA CHOOSES TO RELEASE HIS ORIGINAL LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
And, yes, I believe, based on the evidence, that Obama's COLB could very well be a forgery. It might not be, but in either case it is NOT sufficient to prove that he was actually born in Hawaii. It's funny how evidence and logic work.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:56 am
Why not just y'all cut to the chase and say what you really mean, “Thars a nigga' in da White House, and nobody cares! HOLY SHEET!”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:58 am
Judas Gutenberg: And I thought all this time that Obama was descended from giraffes. Shows how much I know!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:02 am
OK, hold that thought for the next year or so and then see how the “Hope” and “Change” are working out for you…and the country. As far as a 40-year-old
conspiracy goes, I have no idea what you mean. Communists have been working to undermine this country since the Bolshevic Revolution; they just
happened to hit the jackpot this go around with Obama and the rest of their wins in Congress. The floodgates are finally opening. If you are a big
proponent of one-party rule, you must be overjoyed about the election results in Iran and what is happening in Central and South America and Cuba. Yes,
during the runup to 9/11, there was a period of eight years of Bill Clinton, fraught with deception, incompetence, missed opportunity, and treachery, but we
can also blame Bush I and Colin Powell for dropping the ball in the first Gulf War…which could have prevented the next ones. If you listen to Coast to
Coast AM, there are “experts” talking about a large number of asteroids heading toward Earth, and perhaps four of them could hit us…anything is possible.
============================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:03 am
“verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii”
There’s that reading comprehension thing again. YOU quoted it and don’t even fucking see that? Or are you willfully obtuse?
You’d have to be either stupid or willfully obtuse not to notice that a press release on official Hawai’ian state letterhead, bearing the Governor’s name, made by the Director of the Dept. of Health, comes from the State of Hawai’i.
Did you mean the fire god who lives at the base of the undersea volcano has not belched out his opinion of Obama’s birthplace in a hail of ash and lava? Because I’d agree with you that the fire god has not done so.
Either way, you should maybe take up drinking or popping pills or sniffing glue. Losing brain cells isn’t exactly on your Big List Of Things To Worry About.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:08 am
Mikelow: I beg to differ. Any child born anywhere in the world to one or more American citizens is automatically a US citizen. However, the constitution DOES explicitly state that one must be born on US soil to qualify for the Presidency. However, the definition is somewhat flexible. A US registry ship can be American soil. An embassy compound or a military base can be considered American soil. Any US territory, like Guam or the Virgin Islands, is American soil. The Panama Canal Zone was a US territory when McCain was born.
But if you are born in a hospital in another country, you are out of luck. Candidate Bill Richardson, the NM governor who ran in the Democrat primary last year, has an American father and a Mexican mother. But as her due date approached, dad shipped his wife to Los Angeles, so he could be born in the US instead of Mexico City. A Mexico City birth would have disqualified him to be President — even if BOTH parents had been Americans.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:11 am
First of all, we’ve all seen that bogus link.
Second, DUMB ASS, did you notice the reference to “top secret clearances because they’re members of Congress…” in YOUR OWN POST?
Third, I’ll post the links when you prove you didn’t get arrested for fucking a tunafish sandwich. Can’t you read, stupid? Those are my terms. If you don’t like them, go to a town hall and tell them how mean I was to you.
Fourth, you cannot read or infer from what you have read to you.
“Note it says they are “Given” Top Security Clearance, meaning they are not vetted.”
If someone said you were given a diploma at graduation, it does not mean you didn’t attend the school. You just take it to mean that. Because you’re really fucking stupid.
God, you’re stupider than I first thought, as a matter of fact. This is boring me. Anyone else want to stand in for darpot?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:13 am
I had to do a little research on your claim that Obama had an Indonesian passport. Snopes does a good job of debunking that here:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/passport.asp
“…[T]he claim that Barack Obama must have set out on that trip to Pakistan using a non-U.S. passport is false: The U.S. State Department did not include Pakistan on a “no travel” list barring Americans from traveling there in mid-1981, and evidence documents that Americans could in fact freely visit that country at that time.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:14 am
You goofballs are so sad. Please get some help for yourselves. Hey, check with Doctor Orly. Maybe she is a psycologist as well as a dentist and a realtor and a high powered attorney.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:17 am
The only thing I agree with you on is McCain. I have not read anything about Romney yet. There is not much there. McCain was not born in the US, but it would be reasonable to argue that he was a citizen based on his parents' citizenship.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:19 am
–”BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a “Delayed Certificate” could be filed, which required that “a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates”, which “evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.”–
Note “up to the first birthday of the child”
The BC3 is used to reference “Certification of Live Birth” by the author.
(http://logisticsmonster.com/2009/07/28/obamas-birth-certificate-which-one-is-it/)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:20 am
douglasjbender: I've got another Hawaiian technicality here. While it is true that parents of a Hawaiian child born at home can ASSERT that their child was born in Hawaii, the “Certificate of Live Birth” (and this may be unique to Hawaiian law), does NOT give the name of the city of birth. It simply says the child was born in the state. Obama's COLB gives Honolulu as the city, which indicates that this was fact-checked against the long form (the only existing original and cannot be reproduced) in the files.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:23 am
Garrett: Obama has no power, even as President, to release his long form. If you want to challenge this, then sue in a Hawaiian court and leave the federal administration out of it, because it is beyond their power, even if they wanted to.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:26 am
From what I have seen Robert Klein Engler is a Chicagoan. Not sure how his being refused a passport has to do with anything. Considering the State of Hawaii only issues the short form birth certificate or COLB these days, I do not see how you could reasonably argue that it is not acceptible for proof of birth. What are Hawaiians supposed to use if they lose their original birth certificates? My entire family have used copies from our own state to get passports. The State Department lays out the requirements:
1. PROOF OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP
a. APPLICANTS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES: Submit a previous U.S. passport or certified birth certificate. A birth certificate must include your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records.
Obama's COLB meets those requirements.
Here is a link to the full application:
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/100…
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:32 am
Complete non-sequitur.
You guys try to have it both ways. You say Obama was born in Kenya and Obama's mother wanted her son to be an American so bad, she committed an elaborate fraud – including posting an identical birth announcement into two different Hawaiian papers less than a week and a half later (that claim the listings came from the Dept. of Health).
If she really wanted it that badly, I cannot imagine why she would not make it on over to US soil. Sorry, but it just does not seem plausible.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:33 am
TEWS_Pilot: The site which the Bomford certificate came from is a genealogy site. Most online sites in genealogy (like Ancestry.com) do not post birth certificates of living individuals. This is for personal privacy and identity theft questions. This site merely had Mr. Bomford's certificate up there as an example of how to pursue research in genealogy, and I presume he gave permission for it to be used.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:39 am
Garret: Indonesia was not on the no-fly list during the period in question. There may have been turmoil with the Sukarno government, and consequently there may have been some travelers advisories, but I remember on my early 1960s passport that the only countries not allowed were Cuba, “red” China, North Korea and North Vietnam.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:40 am
Yes. It would be so terrible for Obama. Now all you need is some credible proof. Go for it, baby! LMAO!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:41 am
Obviously, the australian version is a forgery of the kenyan bc. It came out only after orly taitz published the kenyan version. What better way to cast doubt than by making altered copies of the kenyan version and falsely claiming they pre-dated it.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:42 am
Obviously, the australian version is a forgery of the kenyan bc. It came out only after orly taitz published the kenyan version. What better way to cast doubt than by making altered copies of the kenyan version and falsely claiming they pre-dated it.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:42 am
Ratatatat: McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, which was US territory from before 1914 until Gerald Ford (I think) gave it back. There is no question that McCain was born on US soil. Even had his father not been military, he would have qualified.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:44 am
Ratatat,
“Complete non-sequitur.”
No, it wasn't. It was pointing out that not being able to imagine someone doing something that one wouldn't do one's self doesn't mean that someone else wouldn't do that something. (Sometimes, fluidity is impossible.)
“You guys try to have it both ways. You say Obama was born in Kenya and Obama's mother wanted her son to be an American so bad, she committed an elaborate fraud – including posting an identical birth announcement into two different Hawaiian papers less than a week and a half later (that claim the listings came from the Dept. of Health).”
You guys can't read. No “birther” is claiming that Obama's MOTHER posted identical birth announcments in two different Hawaiian papers – rather, it is that she committed a fraud by FALSELY claiming (perhaps) that Barack was born in Hawaii, when in actuality he was (perhaps) born in Kenya. The birth announcements would have been BASED ON that falsely-supplied information.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:47 am
TEWS_Pilot: How about if all this information about Occidental College and his trip to Pakistan was false, totally made up? I have seen no reputable confirmation of either of those theories.
Anyway, Pakistan was never off limits to Americans during the 1980s.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:48 am
-”"verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii”-
——-
Yeah, I read it. And I dismissed because of the aforementioned issue of the records she supposedly saw in Oct. 2008 having been discarded back in 2001 when Hawaii went electronic.
Dr. Fukino has zero credibility with me and many other people because of the contradiction and her previous vagueness in her Oct. 2008 statement.
If you and others want to go on her word at this point that is your choice but not mine.
Which brings up the issue why do you believe Obama’s claims when he is on public record as lying in the past?
Remember Obama said he would stick with Public Funding, then switched to Private Funding for his campaign. The media was all over that one.
Impeach Obama and Re-Elect** Clinton !
We were better off with Bill !
**Okay, so we would have to change the limits or Ignore the Constitution as we are doing with Obama being a Natural Born Citizen.
RoFL
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:50 am
You ask a lot of silly questions. None of them have the slightest bearing in reality. None of them disposes of the untidy fact that the Kenyan birf sirtifikat fooled Orly Taitz (that, or she's a lying fuckwit who filed a forged document with a federal court, knowing it was forged). And Orly is your spokesperson.
Yay for credibility!
As long as you're asking stupid irrelevant questions based on hypotheticals that get your little gerbil brain excited, let's ask what would happen if Obama turns out to be Poseidon, god of the sea? THEN we could show that he was never born in America and in fact must be banished to the ocean deep from whence he came.
What if Obama turns out to be a Puerto Rican woman who has been wearing extensive makeup and walking on stilts?
What if Obama secretly tunneled underneath the Harvard Law School campus and found a really smart bum who looked like Joe Pesci, and the bum did all his legal assignments and handled all his law review editing duties?
What if Obama had a tractor accident as a teen, like Jerry Seinfeld's girlfriend in one episode, and his toes were grafted onto the stumps left behind when his thumbs got sliced off? So now he's going around shaking hands with people who aren't aware he has toe-thumbs. I think that invalidates all the hand-shakes he has participated in since the Iowa caucuses.
What if Obama secretly hates fried chicken and secretly loves mayonnaise? Then we can prove he's not really black.
What if all this is really taking place in a parallel universe, and in the REAL universe, the Australian birth certificate is the fake, and Obama is really some Aussie, and there's a guy in Adelaide who is really running things in the US, with the help of an Aussie who looks like Karl Rove and smells like Harriet Miers?
Homer Simpson: “What if? What if I'm taking a shower and I slip on a bar of soap? OH MY GOD I'd be killed!”
You're absurd. But it's nice to see how upset you are.
Why not just ask “What is it about the President being a colored fella that you lefties seem to be missing?”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:57 am
Steph, besides the fact that you failed to address one single point, you're subliminal bigotry is showing…..tell us what you really think.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:59 am
If I understand you correctly, you presume a private, here-to-fore-unknown individual in the UK cheerfully gave blanket permission for any “birther debunker”
anywhere on Earth, even on a chatboard, to publicly post his private birth certificate for the entire world to see, knowing it could be used by ANYONE to
create a FAKE birth certificate or used in court as evidence in what could be the most high profile fraud case in history and that he could be called to testify
perhaps in the USA? Really?
======================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:00 am
Obviously.
What better way to show how easily-misled a birther can be than to post an idiotic forgery of a Kenyan document online and wait for the (unaccredited) “lawyer” leading the birther movement to snap it up and throw it out to the birther minions, who then follow her over the cliff like lemmings, rather than stand up and admit that an obvious forgery fooled some of them (“but not me!”)?
And what better way to bolster your own credibility than by trying to throw Orly Taitz an absurd lifeline?
We just invented Mr. Bomford. There's no such man. It's really Richard Wolffe slightly modifying his British accent. No such continent as Australia. It's just a sound stage out in the California desert, near Palmdale.
Rupert Murdoch owns it. Liberals made a deal with him after Bush was re-elected. Rupert knew he would profit immensely from being the voice of the “loyal opposition” and being the network that caters to fringe racists. So in exchange for his help getting Obama elected, we promised to help him pretend that Australia exists and do everything else he needed, like paying people to wave their birth certificates at frightened GOP representatives in town hall meetings to discuss what other federal buildings we can name after Ronald Fucking Reagan.
Rupert claims to pay taxes in Australia, but in fact he just pays the taxes to a Cayman Islands offshore holding corporation that used to be owned by Sammy Davis, Jr. and Elvis in a joint venture.
If only you weren't too damned smart to see through our scheme. I guess you'll soon be posting that Roger Patterson Bigfoot video we've been suppressing since 1968, as well. Patterson will be really pissed off. It will harm him in his custody battle with the Loch Ness Monster.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:02 am
Let me get this straight:
The site has been around since at least 2006, maybe 2005. So three or four years ago, Bomford cleverly created a geneology site, and left an empty link where four years later he could host a clever and stunningly authentic dupe of a Kenyan BC he knew would eventually surface?
I gotta be honest, if Obama plans that far ahead and that well…I'm glad he's got the top job. No other nation stands a chance.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:02 am
Oh, I'm sorry.
The reason I didn't answer your questions is because they are stupid.
Not sure how you missed that. Unless, of course, in addition to asking stupid questions, you actually ARE stupid.
Now it makes sense. Carry on.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:04 am
In other words, you have nothing to show that Pakistan was off-limits to Americans or that any of the Occidental College stuff is made-up?
Got it, thanks.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:06 am
You left out black belt.
And also carnival barker.
Plus I think she and Sally Struthers put on some sort of TV/VCR repair seminar in the spring each year.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:08 am
Obama's not even black. He's half-white, and on his father's side mostly Arabic. So, it would be more accurate to say, “Thar's a White Arabic-halfbreed in the White House who's ruining the country by turning it into a debtor and socialistic nation! Holy Kool-Aid!”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:09 am
No. You do not understand him, or anything thus far, correctly.
Bob Robertson indicated the Australian birth certificate was posted as an example of how to pursue research in genealogy.
Your response contains NONE of those words. Not even the conjunctions.
You are sorely missed at Palin headquarters. She needs you to write the chapter entitled “Quitting is Hard, Thankless Work.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:10 am
stephenperry, you just won.
Frankly, I think the birthers should just burn a lower-case “t” on the front lawn of the White House and be done with it.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:13 am
Bob, I think he wants to ask you out. I would say no. He strikes me as a pretty boring conversationalist. One topic and then he's shot his wad.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:14 am
I like the part where you completely ignore the 14th Amendment.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:18 am
Yep, because Obama has sealed his records. Got it?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:20 am
** There is one striking difference between the two documents.**
The entire section is missing between “Signature, Description and Residence of Informant” and “Signature of Registrar” on the Taitz document (Kenyan image).
On the Bomford document (Australian image) there is a section that has: “Signature and Description of Authorized Person, and Name, Description, and Residence of Informant” with nothing to the right of it.
Strange that an entire section was cut-out of Taitz document if it contained nothing…
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:20 am
1. The crests at the top of the two documents are different. Replacing one with the other would be difficult, if not impossible using photoshop methods.
2. The impressed seals of the two documents are radically different. The seal is placed on official documents precisely because it is nearly impossible to remove and/or replace with another one.
One or both of these documents could be forgeries. However, one cannot be remade into the other as a forgery.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:20 am
Nice specious evasion.
You fail to note that beliefs, even foundational ones, must be tested against objective evidence and further tested against common sense.
If you believe the earth is flat, take a ride in a spaceship. You're free, afterward, to continue believing that it's flat, but your belief has been confronted with the contrary evidence.
If you believe that Obama's COLB is forged, without having any evidence at all that it is, then you are more properly REFUSING to believe what all objective data and all common sense analysis suggests is true.
You say that “based on the evidence,” “Obama's COLB could very well be a forgery.” Sounds like you're just HOPING that somehow, someway, it turns out to be fake. You have no evidence that it is. Otherwise, link to it, cite it or at least describe it. You'd be the first.
And then you'd still need to explain why 100 people or 1,000 people would lie and risk their careers and freedom from jail, all for no tangible benefit to themselves.
You “believe” what you think, without thinking about what you believe.
It's funny how evidence and logic work. You have no evidence and you've abandoned all logic. They usually go together, so it makes sense that if you have none of the former, you've no use for the latter.
There's no evidence sufficient to convince you that Obama is legitimate and eligible. That's evident. And racist, when you strip away your capslock and bullshit. He's black. Thus you are unsatisfied that he's American.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:22 am
“At this level, the facts and evidence suggest strongly that Obama has something to hide”
As a professional politician, and the focus of the entire right wing attack machine….duh. No doubt he does have things to hide. That is completely tangential to his eligibility for President.
What is not in doubt is that he has passed through every legal barrier that requires a birth certificate showing natural birth. Since there is no dispute that he has passed those checks, any question of his eligibility must assume that none of those barriers were effective.
The online COLB is *irrelevant*. Technically he doesn't have to prove anything to YOU. The document could be a complete fake, and that would have no bearing on your assertion that every check and balance has failed.
So. I'd love to hear one FACT that shows how all these checks failed. You are indicting the entire process by which we pick a President. Surely you have some proof? Do you know someone who vetted him and failed to check his BC?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:24 am
Keep watching the right-wing sites. Soon they will be saying that THEY faked the Kenyan birf sirtifikat just to weed out the non-believers and cull the slow-witted from their midst.
Some of them will say they did it to expose the “mole” in the birther operation as a total fraud and doofus. I'm talking about none other than Orly Taint. I'm sure there are those in the birther movement who want to see her go away. What better way than to fool her with a stupid forgery, thus dooming her credibility?
Good luck separating your conspiracy theory from this OBVIOUS and hilarious forged Kenyan birth certificate!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:25 am
The reason I didn't answer “you're” questions is because I have no answer….there, I fixed it for you.
…when you get to 8th grade, you will learn the difference between “your” and “you're”, too….good luck with your studies.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:26 am
“The point is this. If you lived in Hawaii but had a child outside of the country you could obtain a Hawaiian COLB saying you were born in Hawaii.”
False.
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.””
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-…
So, then, what was your point? The President is black? Knew that one.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:27 am
If I understand you correctly, you would have everyone believe a private, here-to-fore-unknown individual in the UK cheerfully gave blanket permission for any “birther debunker” anywhere on Earth, even on a chatboard, to publicly post his private birth certificate for the entire world to see, knowing it could be used by ANYONE to create a FAKE birth certificate or used in court as evidence in what could be the most high profile fraud case in history and that he could be called to testify perhaps in the USA? Really?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:31 am
It is funny how evidence and logic work. For instance, logic would dictate that Linda Lingle, the Republican Governor of Hawaii, would have no vested interest in participating in your posited cover-up. All of the evidence to date, including official documents of the state of Hawaii, as well as the public statements of Hawaiian state officials, indicates that Barack Obama was born in Honolulu in August of 1961.
Basically, you and people like you are a great font of humor for me and people like me. We laugh hysterically at the contortions you put yourself through in order to find some way, any way, to get the black man out of the White House.
The fact is, Obama could call a press conference tomorrow and announce to the world that he is secretly the love child of Dag Hammarskjold and U Thant and that he was born in Moscow on May Day, and he could still only be removed via impeachment in the House and conviction in the Senate. His election was certified by the Congress in January of this year. The question of his eligibility was settled at that time.
Good luck in the future and stay on your meds. They don't seem to be helping, but they probably can't hurt too much.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:32 am
Everyone who has physically held and examined EITHER of these documents, raise your hands….yeah, that's what I thought…..just unseal the records, Mr. “Transparency”…..
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:33 am
-”First of all, we’ve all seen that bogus link.”-
Right back at you. We have all seen Obama’s bogus claim that he posted his “Birth Certificate” when in fact the document in the image says: “Certification of Live Birth” which is not a birth certificate.
Here is a image of a birth certificate so you can recognize one when you see one: http://www.wnd.com/images/090728birthcert.gif
-”"top secret clearances because they’re members of Congress…” in YOUR OWN POST?”–
Sure, and did you read the Note: pointing out the clearances are “Given” vs. the people being investigated.
Oh and I have yet to see you post any links showing that the FBI did a background check on Obama.
Did you know the Federal Election Commission did not investigate or check on Obama’s claims of being a “Natural Born Citizen”?
-”God, you’re stupider than I first thought, as a matter of fact”-
You have proven my suspicions about you. You can not read with comprehension and you jump to conclusions. You are perfect person for Obama’s flock.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:34 am
This most likely is a hoax. The point is, Congress had a hearing to determine if McCain was eligible, and there was much less controversy around him. The right thing to do here is to hold a similar hearing for Obama and address ALL the issues openly and upfront, it was done for McCain so it's no big deal if there is nothing to hide. Why does Obama spend so much to keep everything hidden, why do his supporters resort to name calling, why can't this be investigated out in the open by Congress and officially debunked in a few days, otherwise this will NEVER be put to rest. Why all the obfuscation, secrecy, and avoidance? Why not approach this with the openness, transparency, honesty, and truth we were promised by Obama when he wanted our votes?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:35 am
Cool! What'd I win? I hope I get to shoot Orly Taitz from a helicopter with Sarah Palin and Nicolas Sarkozy!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:38 am
LMAO.
I put “you're' in quotes. See, I was just mocking YOU. Because that's what YOU wrote. (“you're subliminal bigotry is showing”)
God you're dumb!!!
The day I take grammar lessons from an idiotic birther is the day Obama hands you a whip and asks you to use it on him as he is marched out of the Oval Office in chains.
Not gonna happen, doofus.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:42 am
Not yet, sorry. I'm a bit thick.
Let's run through it.
1. You have no evidence.
2. You assert that this is because the evidence is sealed.
3. You ignore the evidence that exists because it doesn't agree with you.
4. You have no hope of ever proving your claims because they are ridiculous and obviously untrue.
5. You take your failure as a sign that the deck has been stacked against you, and the entire machinery of government, Democrat AND Republican, refuses to lift so much as a finger so that the vault can be thrown open and Obama's Negrosity can be exposed for all of White America to see.
6. The more spectacular your failure, the more determined you are to refuse to acknowledge it.
7. You believe in circular reasoning and you think racist suspicion is interchangeable with admissible evidence.
8. You pride yourself on your refusal to admit when you've had your ass handed to you.
Got it? Good.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:46 am
“Arabic-halfbreed”
You stay classy. And racist.
“turning it into a debtor and socialistic nation”
So now we can add “cannot stay on topic” to “racist.”
After all, what the hell does George Bush's economy have to do with Obama's birth certificate?
Unless you mean that you didn't understand the U.S. was a debtor nation with a progressive tax rate before Obama even announced his candidacy. Is that what you mean?
I hope not. I'd hate to have to add “ignoramus” to “racist” and “can't stay on topic.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:48 am
Stop calling Oily's taint a “crease.”
We are having plenty of fun mocking the Kenyan birf sirtifikat as it is. There's no need to be vulgar.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:48 am
Show me proof that Obama has “sealed his records” rather than his records being unavailable due to government and university privacy policies. Saying “He could choose to release them” is not good enough. Why should he release his personal records from before his term of government service just to satisfy the ravings of a bunch of barely conversant lunatics? Show me proof that he has taken steps to make his records less available than those of any other member of the public.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:53 am
See, neither the Aussie birth certificate nor the Kenyan forgery is relevant.
You know which document HAS been physically held and examined? Obama's COLB.
Ask factcheck.org, or Linda Lingle the Republican Governor of Hawai'i. Ask Bill O'Reilly, who claims he examined the document a year ago. Ask World Net Daily, which confirmed on August 23, 2008 that the COLB is authentic.
Or just ask a five year old. They could tell you who the President is. Don't you want to be smarter than a five year old?
I mean, of course, someday… Not now. five year olds are too advanced for you to compare yourself to them right now. I know that's a “stretch” goal but you must set high standards for yourself if you ever want to be “physically held and examined” by any adult human at any point in your life.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:54 am
Holy CRAP! I just realized! The reason Obama has SEALED HIS RECORDS is because they show that he was ACTUALLY born in ROME, and raised by the UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR TO THE UNITED KINGDOM!!!! And then, after a series of freak accidents, he ended up in the care of his NANNY, STANLEY ANN DUNHAM! Who then raised him as her own!! The reason for all the forged birth certificates and whatnot is to provide a FALSE TRAIL for Damien, er, Barack, and the reason so many people are in on it, is that it's a SATANIC PLOT!!11!!1!!!Eleven
Did I get that about right, Douglas?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:55 am
TEWS_Pilot: No, this is just a bloke from South Australia, not the UK, whose birth certificate has been on that genealogy site for maybe years, for all I know. I doubt the guy even heard of this controversy until today.
He didn't post to a chatboard. His birth certificate was “borrowed” to be used on a genealogy site to teach researchers how to read a typical birth certificate. It may have been up there for years, but the forger of the Kenya certificate used it as a template. He has no ponies in this race, and I bet he's embarrassed that the whole world has seen it now. I read some interviews with him this afternoon, and he's clearly dumbdounded. No conspiracy there, mate.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:55 am
Please stop citing random lawyer's opinions as fact. Yes, lawyers have opinions, but it's not until an opposing lawyer and or a judge get involved that it means anything.
None of what you wrote is consequential, unless it was the opinion of a federal judge or higher. If I'm not mistaken, SCOTUS told Donofrio to take a hike. In fact, to quote Donofrio:
“nor do I see that any court would ever provide true justice after what I’ve experienced with my case and Cort’s. I have absolutely NO faith in the US legal system. None. Nada. Zilch. Zippo.”
Sounds a bit like someone's “slam dunk” case got shredded, so they feel they have been denied “true justice” ( as opposed to law).
Again, meaningless opinions.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:57 am
Seriously. If we can get Obama to build a time machine and learn sorcery, he can take over the entire Marvel Universe in no time at all! Dr. Doom will never know what hit him! Come to think of it, I never actually saw Victor Von Doom's birth certificate. Hmm…
Apparently birthers think that Barack Obama is some kind of comic book supervillain, but I'll take that over the Scooby Doo villain reject that is Orly Taitz any day of the week.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:59 am
Steph, you're starting to lose focus. The original topic is whether the Kenyan birth certificate is fake and is the Australian birth certificate the one from which it was created….or was it actually the other way around? No forensic expert had made that determination, and so the case has been filed to force a determination. Pretty clever trick by Orly T. if that is the plan.
The coincidence string is starting to grow longer and longer, so my question about the “lucky find” of the Australian one by a rank amateur chatboard poster at the exact same time as the release of the Kenyan one is on topic, it raises all sorts of other questions, and so is the speculation about the blanket permission to post EITHER of them publicly. Is there a permission statement from the owner of EITHER of the birth certificates prominenly published on their respective sites? Is the Australian birth certificate that of a real person, or “just an example” and not even a real person….which would make IT a FAKE, wouldn't it?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:01 am
Why should he release relevant records from his past? Show you proof that he has taken steps to make his records less available than any other member of the public? Do this for me: Show me ANY of his records from his birth, time at Occidental College, time at Columbia University, time at Harvard University, or his records while a Senator. It is my understanding that he has chosen to NOT release virtually ANY of these records.
“But why should he?”, you apparently ask. Well, besides the fact that he has promised to be one of the most “transparent” President, if not the most “transparent” President, ever, doesn't it seem to you that we, the people of the United States of America, have not only a right but a DUTY to know as much potentially relevant information about someone who is seeking to be, or who actually is, the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth? Good gravy, we know less about Obama than most COMPANIES would know about a potential hire. And why is it that we know both George W. Bush's and Al Gore's and John Kerry's SAT scores, and their (and McCain's) grades, yet we know nothing about any of Obama's test scores or grades?
Thus, he has “sealed” his records in the sense that he refuses to make them available to the public, when he has a moral duty to do so. In this sense, he is ACTIVELY preventing their release, since he has a moral imperative to release that information, so that the American public can better understand who it is they have elected as President, and can do so without resorting to the TWO autobiographies a then-unknown and basically unaccomplished community organizer wrote (apparently with a great deal of help, if they weren't actually ghost-written) to promote himself.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:03 am
stephenperry: You said it more eloquently than I. Thanks. –Bob
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:06 am
Even if you got your hands on Obama's online-posted “supposed” version of his “Certification of Live Birth” and found it to be real, it still would not prove Obama was born in Hawaii, thanks to Hawaii's previously screwed-up system of handing out “Certifications” to adults who merely claim a child was born in Hawaii.
The best way to get to the bottom of all of this is for Obama to release his “Certificate of Live Birth”. But he can't because he does not have one to produce. :o ;)
Which means, unless the F.B.I launches an investigation into the entire matter, we will likely never no the truth one way or the other. It is funny that so many people are willing to believe Obama's posted image of his supposed “Certification of Live Birth” is real; yet will point out how the Kenyan version with far more detail and information has to be a fake.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:07 am
There's no need for a hearing. McCain was born in Panama. Obama was born in Hawai'i.
So says the State of Hawai'i and its Republican Governor, Linda Lingle.
Do you mean we should have a hearing to investigate why the Republican Governor and her state are so corrupt?
Because otherwise, the Tenth Amendment provides that Hawai'i can make up its own laws about birth certificates. They did so. And Hawai'i is satisfied that the President is its favorite son.
The House of Representatives would be unlikely to address your concerns with a hearing. They passed a unanimous resolution declaring, inter alia, that Obama was born in Hawai'i.
So, that leaves the American Grand Jury. They can hold hearings. Get there early before the keg runs dry.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:08 am
Errr…what blanket permission? I read the entire interview, and I didn't see him mention that. I certainly didn't didn't see him offering to testify anywhere. In fact, I'd characterize the entire interview as “rueful indignation”:
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm
Now, to my original question…do you find the 4-year sleeper agent theory credible?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:12 am
“one cannot be remade into the other as a forgery.”
You mean YOU cannot do it yourself.
Because it is beyond serious dispute that someone did in fact make the Kenyan forgery out of the Australian birth certificate.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:12 am
Well, Obama comes by it honestly. Remember, his parents carefully laid the groundwork for their half-black child to be President almost fifty years later!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:13 am
Cause its a one way street with the Left. The Left can ridicule and question the Right, but not the reverse.
Look at how mad the Left is over the Obama Joker Posters. (http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/08…) Yet the same artist who did the famous Obama Hope picture, created a fanged image of Bush that was featured on the cover of LA Weekly and that was perfectly okay. (http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/08…)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:15 am
stephenperry: Does that mean I get to stay behind and hang out with Carla Bruni?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:16 am
The state of Hawaii and its Republican Governor have never stated that Obama was Born in Hawaii.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:18 am
“thanks to Hawaii's previously screwed-up system of handing out “Certifications” to adults who merely claim a child was born in Hawaii.”
False. That system only applied to people who had children that were at least a year old but didn't have a birth certificate. Obama got his when he was four DAYS old.
“Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.””
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-…
Good luck getting the FBI to investigate. They had enough of Obama when they did background checks on him before he became a Senator and before he became President.
The fake detail and fake information on the Kenyan birf sirtifikat beg to be pointed out.
On the other hand, Obama's COLB is so authentic and boring that you're clamoring to see his kindergarten records and his dog's veterinary records in the hope that it turns up something ANYTHING, dear God whatever it takes, just get that uppity nigger out of the White House.
Sorry to disappoint you, darpot. You shouldn't waste your intellect on us. Get on Fox News and make sure they will air your segment. Tape yourself and put it on Youtube. I will help you get your citations to fact and law tidied up.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:18 am
stephenperry,
“Let's run through it.”
Yes, let's.
“1. You have no evidence.”
There is apparently “prima facie” evidence that Obama COULD be hiding information that would disqualify him as President. That evidence is sufficiently strong to result in hundreds of thousands of Americans (and also journalists and editors in other countries) to question Obama's eligibility or legitimacy. Of course it is not evidence which would count as PROOF, but that is why FURTHER EVIDENCE, which Obama seeks to HIDE, is sought.
“2. You assert that this is because the evidence is sealed.”
Partially. And by “sealed” I mean that Obama has EFFECTIVELY “sealed” that information/evidence from being independently examined. Some he has not allowed to be examined at all; while some he has only allowed to be examined by “friendly” individuals or organizations (to whit, the COLB, which has NOT been PHYSICALLY examined by any independent individual or agency).
“3. You ignore the evidence that exists because it doesn't agree with you.”
Baloney.
“4. You have no hope of ever proving your claims because they are ridiculous and obviously untrue.”
Baloney, again. (The title of a Mark Knopfler song, by the way.) I have great hope that the obfuscations and errors of people like you and Obama will be overcome, and the truth will eventually be shown, whether that truth is as I suspect, or as you proclaim. The difference between you and me in this is that I want to SEE the evidence, while you want to KEEP IT HIDDEN.
“5. You take your failure as a sign that the deck has been stacked against you, and the entire machinery of government, Democrat AND Republican, refuses to lift so much as a finger so that the vault can be thrown open and Obama's Negrosity can be exposed for all of White America to see.”
Not at all. Republican politicans have their political careers to consider, and so probably don't want to touch this issue lest they be falsely accused of being “racist”, as you and so many others Obamanuts like you freely accuse those who want to see solid evidence from Obama of being. For your information (as though actual information and truth will have any affect on you), I am far from a racist – one of my best friends (who happens to be a neighbor) is black, and when I first heard about Obama running for President, I was INTRIGUED by him and was ROOTING for him. And it was because of this that I RESEARCHED more about him, and it was THEN that I discovered things about him that caused me to utterly despise him. It had and has absolutely NOTHING to do with his race.
“6. The more spectacular your failure, the more determined you are to refuse to acknowledge it.”
The more blatant your lie, the more you revel in it.
“7. You believe in circular reasoning and you think racist suspicion is interchangeable with admissible evidence.”
It is people like you who are the true racists, using “racism” as a defense against dealing with the issues and the truth. And the only “circular reasoning” being used here is by those who claim Obama is telling the truth because he is telling the truth.
“8. You pride yourself on your refusal to admit when you've had your ass handed to you.”
I would, if I ever had my ass handed to me. Unfortunately, you seem rather unqualified to judge when someone's ass was handed to them.
“Got it? Good.”
You're an incompetent and rude delusional believer in Obama. Yep.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:20 am
When the left mocks Bush for being White, you can bitch.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:23 am
Anything is possible with this bunch of Marxists, but do you believe a native born Causaian American could live his entire life here as a model citizen and neighbor and family man with a “wonderful family” and then we find out he has been an Islamic terrorist for the past 20+ years…oh, wait, wasn't there something in the papers about that just the other day?…..
My point about the permission must be beyond you. Are birth certificates posted publicly on internet sites without permission of the owner of the birth certificate — Yes or no?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:24 am
Obviously you do not know the difference between a Certification of Live Birth and a Certificate of Live Birth, both of which are often referenced as COLB.
Factcheck.org is meaningless, it is private website and has NO legal authority or legal forensic expertise to determine if a document is real or fake. Even if the document the inspected is real it is still irrelevant since it is a Certification and not a Certificate.
Nice try with the school-yard taunt. RoFL
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:26 am
You've won the “Completely Irrelevant and Not-Really-Funny Post of the Year” award. Besides a printout of the post itself, your prize includes a lifetime subscription to “Misguided Comparisons for Dummies” magazine.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:26 am
It was the Democrats who quashed any question about McCain's birthplace and his right to run for president.
The stand-up thing for the Republicans to do would have been to quash this fake controversy about Obama.
Democracy works best when everyone works for what's best for the country, not for the corporations or a particular political party.
Public option health care- the only way to go.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:27 am
Steph, obviously you are not smarter than a five year old if you use that logic. A five year old thinks Santa Clause is coming down the chimney in about 5 months. The rest of your post has already been debunked on this very topic string…read some replies before you hit “Post” next time.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:27 am
Obama is not half-black, a common misconception.
Obama is 50% white, ~44% Arab, and ~6% Black based on a study of his genealogy. As posted here: http://kennethelamb.blogspot.com/2008/02/barak-… (Do a search for “43.75% Arabic”)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:28 am
I am not a document expert. However, the Date and Place of Birth on the australian document shows 10th April. The number 1 in the 10 is an actual 1. The rest of the document uses the lower case L for the number 1.
It was common for older typewriters to not actually have a number 1. Some didn't even have a zero. You used the lower case L for a 1 and the upper case o for a zero.
Here is a link that documents that fact:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Adventist_Youth_Ho…
It includes a picture of a typewriter that has neither numbers one or zero.
I quote from the site:
“Depending on the typewriter you have (if you can find one), there are 26 alphabet keys and some number keys (picture on the right shows only eight – 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), comma, parentheses, period, and other useful keys. The lowercase “L” was used for one (l) and uppercase “o” was used for zero (O).”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:30 am
Ha ha ha. When my parent died, many places wanted original documents, each one costing $20 bucks if purchased from the state. I got one of each, then photocopied them, then embossed them with a raised stamp I got at a garage sale, an old notary public stamp or woman's group stamp or something. Voila! Embossed documents, obviously originals. ha ha ha!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:31 am
You win a certified copy of the flux capacitor that Obama put into his DeLorean when he traveled back in time to 1961 to tell his mother about his master plan to convert America to Islam (you don't think she planned this thing by herself, did you?). I think that was the same trip where he told the current governor of Hawaii's mother that she better remind her daughter not to, and I quote, “fuck this shit up for me.”
On an unrelated note, Joe Biden is really Dr. Emmett Brown.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:31 am
I think Hiliary would have looked into this quite thoroly. I am convinced, along with most normal people, that Obama is a natural born citizen.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:33 am
Snopes says that Barack Obama attended Occidental College in California in 1979-81, under his own name, not as Barry Soetero, an Indonesian foreign student. The original article appeared on April 1, 2009, as an April Fool's joke, and was attributed to the Associated Press, which has never acknowledged this story. Snopes even says that the syntax of the story does not follow the AP journalistic guidelines.
I didn't check where this story was first filed, but it was a hoax.
Are we going to get our facts now from cereal boxes and The Onion?
On the other hand, it might be fun. Tripping up Orly Taitz this week was hilarious.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:34 am
Is that because the Left can dish it out, but they can't take it?
The Left loved to make fun of how Bush talked. Geez, Obama can't even talk with his Teleprompters. Deal with it, get over it. Obama is fair game.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:36 am
Are you kidding? You accept some wild sleeper network theory with a sweeping “anything is possible” comment then ask me some mundane question about posting birth certificates??
http://www.djbcontractors.com/wm/inv/ID/birth/1…
There you go. I picked a name at random (“Larry”) then googled “larry's birth certificate”. Voila. I bet I could do it with “tom”, “dick” and harry”. So what conspiracy are THEY part of?
You casually accept the wildly implausible, and yet seem to think it's UNUSUAL to post personal documents on the Internet. Words fail me.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:36 am
Yes, they did http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/07/28/polit…
That was 2 seconds on google. Do your homework.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:45 am
Do you have any evidence at all to support such a claim?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:46 am
“False. That system only applied to people who had children that were at least a year old but didn't have a birth certificate. Obama got his when he was four DAYS old.” WRONG
Try to get your facts straight. The parent had up to one year from the child's date of birth date to get a Certification of Live Birth. Hawaii was NOT supposed to issue a Certification after one year.
The article has it wrong. Go look at the document that Obama posted on his own website Fight-the-Smears. At the very top of the document in bold it says “Certification of Live Birth” NOT “Certificate”. Additionally, If you click on the link in the article it will take you to another article (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008…) that has an image and if you click on the image you can read the header. (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.shared/image.h…)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:49 am
igotsix: Exactly right. I had a typewriter in high school which was like that. We also had no > or < , { or } or any of those characters. Some early typewriters didn't even have $ signs.
Spanish typewriters didn't advance the carriage when you typed a vowel, so you could type in an accent mark when necessary.
I was in Paris a few months ago and borrowed a friend's keyboard for some e-mails. Although they were still vaguely on the QWERTY system, I had a hard time with the locations of keys. She, my friend, thought I was stupid.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:52 am
I hear you loud and clear. I mean, how dare our president be able to read! And he's not just reading any old thing, he's reading words, too!
The fact that Republicans don't value literacy doesn't mean the rest of us feel the same way. We mocked Bush because his eight-year marathon of incompetence has left the nation worse off. The fact that he sounded like an inbred hick just made the mockery more fun.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:52 am
I stand corrected on the grammar error, clearly I made the original one, and my reply was more a grandfatherly chastisement hoping to prompt you to be more careful in the future. The quotes just caught my attention. I retract my criticism of it. I'm pleased that you do know grammar rules better than I mistakenly thought. I try not to make many, but posting in haste has its dangers. However, commas don't always go inside quotes. The comma goes outside the closing quote if the closing quote is around a single word or phrase prior to a conjunction and prior to “too”, as illustrated in the sentence you criticized — you're probably thinking of quotes in conversation ….we are really off topic. I'll make an effort to ignore pointing out grammar errors in posts from now on — and try not to make any myself — but your bigotry and intolerance are still showing.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:53 am
Fail.
Here's an easy one — Politifact.com and many other sources, including TWI itself, have reported on Lingle and her administration's Dept. of Health having confirmed repeatedly that Obama's COLB is authentic, making Obama Hawaiian by birth.
“Even the governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican who at the time was stumping for John McCain, said it was on the up-and-up.”
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/stateme…
I give you the politifact cite because of the “truth-o-meter” they use. Not that you'll be convinced, of course. Facts are not something you trade in.
Before you go, here's another quote. Read carefully for the words “born in Hawai'i.”
“Hawaii: Obama birth certificate is real
Updated 5m ago
By Dan Nakaso, The Honolulu Advertiser
In an attempt to quash persistent rumors that President Obama was not born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, Hawaii's health director reiterated this afternoon that she has personally seen Obama's birth certificate in the Health Department's archives.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai'i State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-164760.html
You may have missed it, but the headline sort of clues you in – “Hawaii: Obama Birth Certificate is Real” means Hawai''i says his birth certificate is real.
Aren't facts and logic neat?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:55 am
Thanks, Matt. I was afraid I'd have to prove that computers exist or something to satisfy darpot The Mental Giant.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:55 am
You do realize that Kenya is in Africa, right? Anyone with a website can claim anything. http://robertgibbsisthezodiackiller.com/ for example. But does “Kenneth The Lamb” at blogspot have any integrity for such claims? Besides, it wouldn't matter if Obama's parents were both 100% Arab, and he was a devote muslim. If he was born in this country (which he was, in Hawaii), and if he was fairly elected (and he was), then that is the end of it. He is the President of the United States.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:56 am
quote from stephenperry ” …whatever it takes, just get that uppity nigger out of the White House”
As usual with Obama supporters anytime someone challenges, opposes, questions Obama, and the supporters have nothing logical or constructive to say they resort to insults and start playing the Race card.
Well, guess what it ain't going to work.
I give you three reasons I want to see Obama Impeached:
1) Obama has failed to meet the Eligibility requirements to be President as set forth in the Constitution. And, no one even your Messiah is above the law.
2) Obama is an empty suite with almost no leadership experience, and everyday that passes he demonstrates his inability to lead this Republic.
3) Obama is anti-America and is a Socialist.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:57 am
Hear, hear, especially as to the last sentence. Well-stated, raven. Please keep posting.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:57 am
What fresh hell is this?
Yeah, that family tree would soooo have gotten him into University of Alabama.
How about this: If you could drink at the white fountains pre-1964, you're not black. If you couldn't, then you are. It's that simple. Believe me, Obama would have been in the same line as all the rest.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:02 am
On the one hand he has a BC on the internet for everyone to see, yet there is another BC locked in a vault in Hawaii that no one can see! That in and of itself legitimizes the elegibility question. However, for me, the BC question is moot because there is no question regarding the nationality of his Kenyan father. I wouldn't care if Obama was born in the White House Lincoln bedroom on the 4th of July!! At the time of his birth his Kenyan father was a British citizen which under British law automatically conferred British citizenship to his son Obama.. Even if his mother was able to confer her American citizen status to him, which btw she could not because she was too young, at best Obama would have been born with dual citizenship which is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution re. presidential elegibility.The requirement is natiral born WITHOUT dual citizenship, not natural born with dual citizenship!!! He was born ineligible to hold the office of POTUS!! In addition, by his own admission in his book he attended both Catholic and muslim schools in Indonesia. Indonesia is a muslim country which does not allow non-muslim non-Indonesian citizens to attend their muslim schools. This is why Obama's Indonesian school records list him as a muslim AND Indonesian citizen. At the time, Indonesia did not have duel citizenship with the U.S. The only way Indonesia would recognize Obama as an Indonesian citizen would be if he did not have U.S. citizenship, which he did not!! Finally, again as he wrote in his book, he traveled to Pakistan in 1981 as a college student. At the time Pakistan was not permitting Americans to enter their country. Therefore he could not have used an American passport. What passport did he use? Whichever passport it was it would have indicated him as being a citizen of THAT country, again disqualifying him as being elegibile to be POTUS!! His BC? A side issue, at best icing on the cake! He is constitutionally inelegible to be President. Every foreign leader knows it. The media knows it. Every member of congress knows it. But they are moral weaklings and political cowards too handcuffed by political correctness and a paralyzing fear of race riots to admit it. Nevertheless it will be revealed by a foreign entity as the ultimate terrorist act, he will be forced to resign, the country will convulse into chaos.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:04 am
-”Good luck getting the FBI to investigate. They had enough of Obama when they did background checks on him before he became a Senator and before he became President.”-
+++++
Got any links that say the FBI actually did a background check on Obama?
Along with what level of clearance Obama got?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:04 am
What do I need to deal with or get over? Aren't YOU the birther?
Aren't YOU the one who needs to deal with and get over the fact that your man lost the Presidential election?
Aren't YOU the one whining about the left? I'm not whining about name-calling, doofus; you are.
I just pointed out the yawning chasm between mocking a grown man's inability to master subject-verb agreement (“Is our children learning”) and mocking another man's skin color.
Obama is indeed fair game. He's the President. But what about your “game” is “fair?”
You have no evidence, no credible argument for why no evidence supports you, no explanation for the evidence that controverts your suspicion, and no credible spokesperson to advance your non-explanation and non-arguments.
Yet you birthers persist in vile slurs and slanders against various and sundry politicians, government employees, journalists, foreign citizens, dead white women named Stanley, and anyone who disagrees with your decision to pout because a black guy beat a white guy in public and no one lynched the black guy.
Your game is weak. You don't even deserve to ride the pine. Hit the showers and find Larry Craig sitting in the bathroom with a “wide stance.”
Deal with it, get over it. Bush used teleprompters. Sarah Palin uses teleprompters. For that matter, Bush WORE A WIRE into the first debate with Kerry (the White House blamed the distinct bulge in the back of his suit, where the transmitter was, on the “White House tailor” who apparently couldn't fit the President for a suit without leaving a six inch by four inch box-shaped bulge between Bush's shoulder blades.
And Bush STILL GOT HIS ASS KICKED IN THAT DEBATE.
Sheesh.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:06 am
BIRTHER FAIL.
“The state of Hawaii and its Republican Governor have never stated that Obama was Born in Hawaii.”–darpot
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WAS BORN IN HAWAII and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-…
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:06 am
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Do you have any?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:09 am
“However, for me, the BC question is moot because there is no question regarding the nationality of his Kenyan father.”
You don't understand basic citizenship law or the 14th Amendment.
What's the point in trying to get you to understand that Hawai'i considers the matter closed, because Hawai'i issues a COLB as its official birth certificate? Neither the State Dept. nor a private citizen has any recognizable interest in seeing anything beyond a COLB.
Of course, you're too busy blaming “Every foreign leader,” “the media,” and “every member of Congress” for not screaming “There's a colored man in the White House! Eek! Get him before he touches stuff!”
Republicans want to run Obama out of town on a rail. You think they would have let him get into office if they thought his birth certificate was faked?
Oh wait, you still think no one else but you knows that Obama's dad was not a citizen of the U.S.
Never mind. And never mind trying to make paragraphs out of your word blender of a post. No one is going to read it. Except for people like me, who enjoy pointing out the stupidity of racists.
Carry on.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:12 am
Why why why why?
Here's a question. Why do you get to question a legal Hawaiian document, and go on a fishing expedition through a person's life? It may surprise to you know that Presidents, as citizens, have some right to privacy.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:14 am
No, you asked a stupid question, so I gave you a scenario that has played out regarding sleeper cells. My question concerned the SPECIFIC Australian
birth certificate and whether permission had been obtained from its owner to blast it all over the internet and the consequences of its being submited in a
court of law in the US and the owner having to appear in court in a fraud case. Maybe you don't care to get to the truth about who Barack Obama actually
is, we already know he is a radical Marxist, fine with me, but I want to be certain the POTUS is NOT a foreign national…especially since all his policies are
those of a foreign dictator bent on destroying this country.
==============
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:16 am
TEWS_Pilot : Yes, with the owner's permission. For several years, in fact.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:17 am
Yeah and that whole statement was blown out of the water, when the Hawaii Department of Health stated the following:
“*In 2001 – the state of Hawaii Health Department went paperless.*Paper documents were discarded*The official record of Obama's birth is now an official ELECTRONIC record Janice Okubo, spokeswoman for the Health Department told the Honolulu Star Bulletin, “At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting,” she said.”
(Link: http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnn/jon_kle…)
So unless Dr. Fukino had a time machine she could not have inspected Obama's original birth records as she claimed she did in Oct. 2008, because the paper records were discarded in 2001.
Somebody is lying.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:17 am
Aplying the standard rule of forensics, cui bono? (who benefits?), the one inescapable conclusion is that the forgery wasn't the work of a true birther. One then has to ask what motivated the forger? Was it simply someone who saw the chance to make a quick buck or, more sinisterely, was it done to discredit the birther movement? It is hard to believe the former, since any reasonably intelligent person should have become immediately suspicious upon being offered the certificate in return for money. Therefore the forgery was quite likely foisted on the birther movement in order to discredit it. The question is why? If, indeed, Obama has nothing to hide, why take such a risk instead of simply leaving the birthers to stew in their own juice?
Another mystery is the circumstances of the discovery. What are the odds of someone discovering the original by chance or even, suspecting fraud, by diligently searching the internet? It seems much more likely that the the it was the forger himself who “discovered” the original and that it was the intention all along, which is why so many markers of the original were left in place on the forgery.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:17 am
So SAM if I understand you correctly, there isn't anything that would convince you, not a birth certificate, and not an explanation from a lawyer with an :LL.M in international law as to why your long-winded explanation is in short, nonsense.
Glad to know. Won't bother and try
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:18 am
Do you have any links that say you did not get arrested for committing lewd and unnatural acts with a tunafish sandwich?
It's beyond dispute that the FBI does background checks and the CIA issues security clearances.
Remember the Sotomayor hearings? On the 2nd day they went to a closed-door session…to review Sotomayor's FBI BACKGROUND CHECK.
SCOTUS judges, like ALL federal judges, get a background check.
Senators and Presidents, like ALL elected federal officials, get a background check.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee members, like ALL members of Congress who are privy to state secrets, get a special CIA security clearance.
I am tired of doing your homework for you, junior. You post the link that proves you didn't fuck a tunafish sandwich and I'll provide links explaining what is obvious to any middle-school student.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:19 am
“Yet you birthers persist in vile slurs and slanders against various and sundry politicians, government employees, journalists, foreign citizens, dead white women named Stanley, and anyone who disagrees with your decision to pout because a black guy beat a white guy in public and no one lynched the black guy.”
That's right – all dead white women must be treated as saints. Shame on me. Plus, it's common knowledge that being 50% White, 43.75% Arabic, and 6.25% Negro means one is “black”. What a doofus.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:21 am
I hear that Adolph Hitler authored a very popular and influential book. And he had a near-genius IQ. Smooth-talking, charismatic politicians who read lots of racist and socialist books are da bomb.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:23 am
“Obama has failed to meet the Eligibility requirements”
According to who? You? Because the people and entities that decide that question decided that he met them. Take it up with Linda Lingle and the State of Hawaii.
You just want to keep ignoring the evidence that the LAW says is just fine. COLB is an official birth certificate, and it is prima facie evidence of the facts recited therein. Says so right on the face of the COLB.
Got anything to shift that burden of proof? That is what “prima facie” means anyway.
“Obama is an empty suite”
No. Obama is a person. He is not, to my knowledge, an unoccupied deluxe hotel accommodation.
I wrote plenty of logical and constructive things. I've posted all over this board and I have several hundred “points,” so people must have found something I said to be at least a little informative or useful.
When you present any facts, I will counter them with the same. Until then, you're just spinning like mad to avoid falling over. And I am satisfied with what I do to help you wobble.
“Obama is anti-America and is a Socialist.”
Yes. That's convincing. Got any links? LMAO.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:25 am
Dual citizenship is not a barrier to being natural-born, at least as far as Title 8, section 1401 of the US Code (i.e., the law) is concerned. You must be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States – which would exempt a diplomat's children. But you can be a dual citizen.
It's right there in the US Code.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:26 am
Well at least I have been getting my facts right vs. the non-sense you keep posting. You supposedly had looked at Obama's posted image of his “Birth Certificate”; yet you could not even read that the Header on the document which said: “CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:27 am
Or a birther was hoping to get away with it. Don't know why you would not consider that possibility. Sounds like the “No True Scotsman” fallacy to me.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:28 am
Why do you imagine Obama had anything do to with it? I'm quite certain large swathes of the Left would take (and are taking) merciless glee in confounding the birthers.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:31 am
Do you ever post anything you know two shits about?
“The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth program was established in 1911, during the territorial era, to register a person born in Hawaii who was one year old or older and whose birth had not been previously registered in Hawaii. The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth Program was terminated in 1972, during the statehood era.”
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-re…
In case you missed it, that's the State of Hawaii confirming EXACTLY what I wrote above.
You quoted me and just wrote “WRONG” after the quote. Were you talking about yourself again?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:34 am
American Jews are conferred Israeli citizenship at birth because of their parents' religion. Does this mean Lieberman could not possibly be president, nor any Jew for that matter?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:35 am
No. Okubo did not say that originals were discarded. You’re just referring to an email CNN chief Jon Klein sent around referring to his own research.
Okubo corrected him in Hawai’i's newspaper:
“In 2001, Hawai’i's paper documents were reproduced in electronic format but “any paper data prior to that still exists,” Health Department spokeswoman Okubo said.
Okubo would not say where Obama’s original birth certificate is, but said “we have backups for all of our backups.”"
And look at the same article for proof that “original vital records” refers to the electronically-stored data.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:36 am
Knowing that SAM cannot be convinced by logic, fact, reason, or law, I will simply continue to mock the nonsense SAM sputters when questioned.
I don't expect to get anything out of SAM by doing so. But I do expect SAM to go to a town hall and bring his ziplock-bagged birth certificate along.
Just doing my part to keep Democratic candidates from having to spend money on advertising to get re-elected.
Plus, you have to admit it's fun to mock racists. You can't even pick on fat kids anymore.
This birther crap is your only politically-correct pinata, and I intend to whack it until the birthers' candy-assed reasoning spills out all over the place for us all to pick though and point at while laughing heartily.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:36 am
I agree. The birthers are just fishing for more info to create more conspiracies. That is all this is. The State of Hawaii has put this to bed a while ago.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:37 am
Then the birthers are massively stupid. In what sense could they get away with it with such a high-profile victim who would just have happened to be the one person outside of the fraud definitely knowing that it was a fraud. That also leaves us with the question why Obama didn't immediately insitute proceedings against the fraudsters.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:38 am
“Therefore the forgery was quite likely foisted on the birther movement in order to discredit it. The question is why?”
Um, didn't you just answer your own stupid question?
Hint: it's the part where you wrote “in order to discredit it.”
Don't stay up all night trying to solve any more Big Mysteries of Time And Space.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:38 am
I guess Presidents are the only citizens with a right to privacy because this email is being filtered by, you phone calls listened to, and your medical records collected by the government.
____________________________________________________________
The strong, silent type. Click here for great looking bamboo flooring!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/…
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:39 am
That is a possibility. But why did Obama go along with it? Is it fitting for the President to indulge childish pranks?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:40 am
Your first sentence nailed it.
And why would Obama get involved in any way, shape or form? He's a bit busy to be chasing down photoshop kiddies, don't you think?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:44 am
So basically you have no proof that the FBI did a background check on Obama and has verified Obama was indeed born in Hawaii.
And I know why you don't. Because back in 2008, I took the time to research into whether the FBI did look into Obama's claim of being born in Hawaii.
—————————————
CALLER – Do they perform background checks on candidates and fellows who are in Congress and the Senate and perhaps potential presidential candidates?.
FBI – The short answer is no. No we don’t, but they’re given top secret clearances because they’re members of Congress, or Senators, or even higher ranking officials.
HOST – Time out. There are no background checks from the FBI on the people that lead the country, the United States of America?
FBI – Let me emphasize, elected officials. This is a democracy, the people have elected an official to represent them in Washington, and we do not routinely run background checks on those people.
HOST – Even people running for president of the United States of America?
FBI – That’s correct.
—————————————
Note it says they are “Given” Top Security Clearance, meaning they are not vetted.
Link to update: http://citizensagainstproobamamediabias.wordpre…
Keep swilling that Kool-Aid!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:44 am
The question is, why invent something in order to discredit the movement if there is nothing to hide? Surely it is then just a matter of time before they get to be shown up for a bunch of kooks?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:44 am
No one said dead white women must be treated as saints. Well, no one besides the Catholic Church.
A dead white woman you never met who did nothing to you except foist a President on you by giving birth to him before she died a painful lingering death from cancer is not necessarily a saint.
But that doesn't give birthers license to slander her and accuse her of anything from being a whore to being a criminal bent on breaking immigration law and defrauding newspapers by posting fake announcements so she could get on welfare (thanks for that argument, Orly!)
And indeed, it is common knowledge that a man with a single drop of Negro blood is “black.”
I don't expect you to know that this has been the historical test since before the Founding Fathers signed a document that said blacks are 3/5ths of a person.
The reason I don't expect you to know this is that I learned long ago that racists are STOOPID motherfuckers.
Doofus.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:45 am
Perhaps. But I assure you if *I* try and tap your phone, I'm going to jail. Citizens don't have all the powers of government.
Not that I agree with the whole FISA thing, mind you. But that's a different topic.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:46 am
Bzzt! Fail.
You've been cited for stealing too many lines from Orly Taitz. She did the Hitler thing and got called on it by David Shuster.
You also fail for impersonating a white person impersonating a black person. What's “da bomb” is meeting a white person who doesn't use black slang from 1987.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:47 am
“He's a bit busy to be chasing down photoshop kiddies, don't you think?” Or “racist” cops, Portuguese waterdogs and hamburger photo-ops.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:47 am
Lol. Obviously Okubo got it wrong. It is pretty silly to assume someone lied. Are you accusing the Republican administration that backed McCain to bend over backwards to commit a conspiracy to keep Obama in office? Seriously?
Regardless, Fukino said what you said she did not say. Got it?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:49 am
“Dr. Fukino has zero credibility with me and many other people because of the contradiction and her previous vagueness in her Oct. 2008 statement.
If you and others want to go on her word at this point that is your choice but not mine.”
I showed you that there’s no contradiction. You’re just bent on your insane refusal to read a fucking document without slanting it to fit your conspiracy theory.
So, yes, I think I WILL take the word of the Hawai’ian government officials charged with maintaining the records over the word of a birther who cannot even read his own posts.
I would feel bad about mocking you people if you didn’t persist with obnoxious idiocy.
Enjoy the next 7.5 years. Although the subsequent 8 won’t suit you much better. I bet you don’t like Hillary either. Oh well. Sucks to be you.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:49 am
Yeah. You sure get your facts right like “The state of Hawaii and its Republican Governor have never stated that Obama was Born in Hawaii.”–darpot
Hahahaha.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:49 am
I'm not sure what you mean by “go along with”. I certainly don't expect him to post on DailyKos saying “Ok guys, now stop teasing the birthers”. Seriously, let him deal with important stuff, this is trivial internet boogery.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:51 am
You don't know who invented it.
If it was a non-birther, they could have done so just for the sheer joy of watching dumbfuck birther lawyers like Orly Taitz file it in court.
Do you ever ask yourself why people hack computer programs or write malicious code? Some of them do it JUST TO PROVE THEY CAN.
Of course, a non-birther could also have done it just to show how stupid birthers are. Or to show what a REAL forgery looks like.
A birther could have done it, just to expose the stupidity of Orly Taitz and get her out of the way so that the real “leading lights” of the birther movement could run the show.
But you aren't serious. Otherwise you wouldn't persist with the “matter of time before they get to be shown up for a bunch of kooks.”
Don't know how else to say this so I'll be blunt. The birthers have been shown to be nothing but kooks since the day Obama posted his birth certificate online. Shortly after that, but well before the Hawai'ian newspaper birth announcements were discussed in the media, birthers became commonly perceived to be nothing more than racist kooks.
Gee, this is getting to be fun again! There's a whole new crop of you chowderheads. And here I thought that being humiliated repeatedly in the media, even by conservative publications like WSJ and NRO, would make you go back to your Civil War re-enactments and Renaissance Faires.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:55 am
Sorry, but your “Fail” comment is getting old and annoying. I don't think it's as cool and clever as you think it is. Even if it is, using it a thousand times lessens its impact.
“You've been cited for stealing too many lines from Orly Taitz. She did the Hitler thing and got called on it by David Shuster.”
I was not aware of that. Perhaps the “Hitler thing” is something that is unusually relevant to Obama and his autobiographies and his unthinking mass of fanatical followers and his charisma and use of lies. Nah, it must be that I copied Orly Taitz.
“You also fail for impersonating a white person impersonating a black person. What's 'da bomb' is meeting a white person who doesn't use black slang from 1987.”
And how do you know that I'm a white person? Are you psychic? Besides, “da bomb” is still in use within some non-white communities today; and even if it wasn't, its slangish meaning was and is quite recognized, even by someone like you.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:55 am
cop thing = politics
hamburger = good PR
the dog = when you're a father you'll understand
birthers = toxic nonsense. Frankly, most of us posting here are only doing it for some sort of shameless catharsis. Even the *GOP* is embarassed by those kooks, and you expect Obama to get involved? I mean, really.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:57 am
Oh, now you've done it.
SAM is catatonic somewhere anticipating the possibility of a Jewish “OMG dual citizen” President.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:59 am
“But why did Obama go along with it?”
You have a fascinating habit of assuming spectacularly improbable facts.
Do you even CARE that you have no evidence whatsoever that ANYONE in the Obama Administration, much less Obama himself, knew about the forgery of the Kenyan birth certificate before Orly Taitz posted it online?
You can direct that “childish pranks” thing to your frat boy beer-drinkin' buddy, Dubya.
For all you know, BUSH is the one who forged the birth certificate. As long as you're making up outlandish shit and writing about it in a somber voice (“Is it fitting for the President to indulge childish pranks?”), may as well say something interesting.
You know, you birthers really crack me up.
You think Obama is omnipotent. You think he hears every conversation before a word is spoken and that he knows if you've been naughty or nice.
He kicked McCain's ass in the election.
No Republican official has the balls to say to a television camera that his obviously forged COLB is forged. No Republican has the guts to say he's not a citizen because his dad was not a citizen. No Republican has the guts to demand to see his kindergarten records.
And yet, you think that you're going to be able to beat him by whining in left-wing comment boards?
Reminds me of Batman Returns. Morgan Freeman's character shuts down the M&A lawyer who discovered Bruce Wayne's secret:
“Let me get this straight. You think your boss, one of the world's richest men, spends his nights beating criminals to a pulp with his bare hands. And your plan is to BLACKMAIL this person? Good luck!”
Keep on sniffing your fingers and lighting each other's farts. You're sure to bring about a Constitutional crisis one of these days, losers.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:59 am
Surely you don't want a President who turns a blind eye to crimes, as forgery is? On the other hand, this is perhaps small potatoes compared to his profitable dealings with the shady Tony Rezko.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:06 am
Hmm, you have a point there. I saw them bust that crime ring in New Jersey and Obama was NOWHERE to be seen What a slacker!
You do realize that Presidents don't actually *arrest* people? They have, what do you call them…oh, police and federal agents to handle crime?
Come on, the “blind eye to crime” bit was sort of weak sauce. If you're going to be ironic, put some effort into it.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:06 am
“shameless catharsis”
Oh no, there's lots of shame involved in being a birther.
I don't know what you mean about catharsis. I'm not in this to be transformed or relieved of anything. I'm just in it to mock dumbasses who don't understand they're being mocked half the time.
Well, that and it pisses me off royally that these people try to divide and distract us at a time of economic peril and military strain. Not as though we could be focusing on things like health care and employment or anything.
No, no, let's have a Congressional investigation into whether Hawai'i is lying. Surely Hawai'i just hasn't looked closely enough at the records to notice the part where Obama admits to being a black guy.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:10 am
“No one said dead white women must be treated as saints….”
Well, you are all beginning to ACT like at least Stanley Ann Dunham should be treated as some sort of saint.
“A dead white woman you never met who did nothing to you except foist a President on you by giving birth to him before she died a painful lingering death from cancer is not necessarily a saint.”
Therefore, I should not form an opinion about her based on her own words, the words of her friends, and her own actions? At least if that opinion is not positive?
“But that doesn't give birthers license to slander her and accuse her of anything from being a whore to being a criminal bent on breaking immigration law and defrauding newspapers by posting fake announcements so she could get on welfare (thanks for that argument, Orly!) “
I have not accused Stanley Ann Dunham of having been a whore (nor have I said she was not); and I have not accused her of being “a criminal bent on breaking immigration law and defrauding newspapers” – rather, I have stated that she MIGHT have fraudulently claimed that Barack was born in Hawaii, when he might have actually been born in Kenya. She might have done this only thinking that it was what was best for Barack, without any primary intent on “breaking immigration law and defrauding newspapers” (it would have been a “secondary intent” in that she would likely have realized that would be the result).
“And indeed, it is common knowledge that a man with a single drop of Negro blood is 'black.' “
Amazing. If that's the case, there's a good possibility that many white people who have had blood transfusions are actually “black”. But your above comment is so foolish as to hardly deserve a response – but I will respond anyway, if only for the sake of others who might be reading. By your logic, it would also follow that “a man with a single drop of [Caucasian] blood” is “white”. Which would make Obama the first “Black and White” President ever.
“I don't expect you to know that this has been the historical test since before the Founding Fathers signed a document that said blacks are 3/5ths of a person.”
References or actual evidence of the veracity of your claim regarding that being the “historical test”, and the unstated implication that it still holds today, would be nice, but not expected.
“The reason I don't expect you to know this is that I learned long ago that racists are STOOPID motherfuckers.”
Don't be so hard on yourself. I think it's possible that not all racists are attracted to their mothers. But just in case, perhaps you should avoid family reunions.
“Doofus.”
I know who you are. You don't need to sign your posts.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:13 am
Absolutely. “Show us your records” can loosely be translated as “we've worn out the old talking points, we need new ones!”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:14 am
Forgive me for prying, but you rarely meet anyone who so casually admits to acute paranoia.
Do you think the government is reading your text messages begging your ex-girlfriend to let you come over and cuddle with her?
Are you convinced your Grandma's birthday card had a $5 in it before the CIA intercepted your mail?
Have you ever noticed a “click” when you're on a telephone call and realized that the National Security Agency is getting sloppy when it listens in on your discussions of who really should have won America's Next Top Model?
Do you think Obama reads your medical records before deciding whether to allow you to enter a federal building?
Pass the tinfoil hat. I have some barbed wire and black sunglasses I can give you.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:15 am
-”I just pointed out the yawning chasm between mocking a grown man's inability to master subject-verb agreement (“Is our children learning”) and mocking another man's skin color.”-
You played the race card and just admitted.
The poster is white faced because of the white face used by the Joker.
(http://www.popartuk.com/g/l/lgmp0907+why-so-ser…)
People like you would have played the race card even if the creator of the poster had changed the white face to black. And in that case I might agree.
—————
-”You have no evidence, no credible argument for why no evidence supports you, no explanation for the evidence that controverts your suspicion, and no credible spokesperson to advance your non-explanation and non-arguments.”-
Blah, Blah, Blah. Getting in a Tis…
—–
-”Your game is weak. You don't even deserve to ride the pine. Hit the showers and find Larry Craig sitting in the bathroom with a “wide stance.”-
Yep, nothing left to say, so start with the Insults.
RoFL
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:21 am
Do you ever write anything you know anything about?
I will be glad to read it, if so.
Until then, keep doing what you're doing. You're a breath of fresh air.
I never said YOU said anything about Obama's mom, stupid. I said “birthers.” If you need me to search the threads at this website to find the birthers' own revolting words, say so.
You don't know the one drop of black blood rule? Wow. Even fucking Wikipedia knows that…
“In its most extreme form in the United States, hypodescent was the basis of the “one drop rule”, meaning that if a person had one drop of black blood, he was considered to be black. New laws arose long after the end of slavery, such as the Virginia's 1924 Act for the “Preservation of Racial Integrity”, which defined as white a person with “no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian.” This may have been in reaction to general social tensions of the post-WWI years, and to increasing agitation by African Americans to regain civil rights.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypodescent
You're too stupid to be interesting anymore. Apologies if I no longer take the time to give you specific personal attention. I will continue to mock you generally as one standout in an all-star class of birthers.
You're better off if I leave you alone. You need a chance to rebuild your self-esteem after getting your ass handed to you repeatedly like this. Too bad there's no mercy rule on liberal blogs like there is in t-ball.
Dumb. Ass.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:22 am
Fake BCs & COLBs do not change the actual location of Obama's birth or that he was a dual-citizen before he became Indonesian. His adoption and namechange were beyond the juvenile Soetoro's control. Stannie didn't want the kid home all day and he had to be Indonesian for the school system to babysit him. Giving birth in Kenya, at least two uncircumcised third-world sex-partners, no wonder Stannie died of ovarian cancer. If the Usurper resigns now his presidency, appointments, etc. might not get nullified. He should grant Bill Clinton a full pardon for his perjury conviction and all the other crimes he was accused of.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:27 am
Dumbass.
I never said the joker thing was about race. You did.
If you want to deny that the racist emails and racist “jokes” about Obama that have been circulating on the right-wing are not about race, go for it.
Until then, you're just proving me right. You're a dumbass. Wish I could give a shit.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:30 am
Dumb ass.
I hope you find my posts annoying. Get out there to a town hall meeting and complain about that too.
I never said you were a white person. I said you fail for impersonating a white person.
You failed reading comprehension too.
Aren't there any birthers out there worth mocking? Even naturalborn, AristotletheHun, Tuci78, d2i, kwiley123, RandWulf could understand, most of the time, written English.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:36 am
Read the ARTICLE that TWI posted again. It says “certificate of live birth.”
“Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.””
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-…
Did you see where it says “certificate of live birth?”
Good. Now get back to making up gibberish.
If you want to argue with Hawai'ian officials that's fine. But stop arguing with what your eyes see.
In fact, that's the birthers' whole problem. They constantly try to deny reality.
Good luck with that.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:45 am
You played the race card with the following:
–”When the left mocks Bush for being White, you can bitch.”
The Left has been using this tactic since it came down to Obama & McCain. If you were not for Obama you were labeled or called a Racist.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:47 am
Dual citizenship is fine. US Code, Title 8, section 1401. Sole jurisdiction at birth is all that's required.
Hawaiian officials have specifically confirmed the location of his birth (give you one guess).
Glad that's all cleared up!
(agree about Clinton though)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:55 am
No one is lying. Except you. Hard to tell. You could just be stupid. I'm feeling charitable. I'll go with that.
Okubo said she viewed the “original vital records.” These are stored electronically and these are the records used to generate a COLB when an official birth certificate is requested. She didn't say she reviewed the hard copy of the original. Nor did she ever say the originals were discarded. They have the originals. You just cannot see them. Sucks, huh?
Have you ever used an electronic doo-hickey to look at stuff? Some call it a “computer.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:57 am
That is not playing the race card. You're silly and disingenuous.
There is a distinct difference between the mockery of Bush and the mockery of Obama.
It is the RACIST jerks who send around emails and other offensive “jokes” that are playing the race card.
Your argument would be the same as telling a rape victim that she is playing the gender card.
Grow up.
Pingback posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:23 am
[...] look away as birther loon Orly Taitz goes nuts.RELATED: The Washington Independent thinks they’ve found the original Kenyan document that may have been altered to show Barack Obama’s name. [...]
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:26 am
Original records does not mean electronic version.
If she meant an Electronic images of the Original records, then she should have stated so.
-”Nor did she ever say the originals were discarded.”-
Correct Dr. Fukino did not. But Janice Okubo, spkeswoman for the Helath Department did.
From the above quote.
++”*Paper documents were discarded*”++
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:33 am
–”Have you ever used an electronic doo-hickey to look at stuff? Some call it a “computer.”–
Yes, in fact I am using one right now to show how badly informed you are.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:45 am
your friend “found it” cause he made it. the ABC aka “Bomford” has already been debunked and pulled off sites. Photoshopped and not very well done.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:55 am
-”That is not playing the race card. You're silly and disingenuous.”-
Really? Then why do you bring Bush's skin color into the topic? Why didn't you just say “When the left mocks Bush for being a Texan”?
Not so funny now is it?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:16 am
I hate to even comment on the birther stuff, but I'll take the bait and put in my two cents. Let's just assume that everything that supports him being born in HI is unreliable. Let's assume he wasn't vetted by the FBI or CIA. Let's assume that every political opponent he faced in the two year long presidential campaign missed some crucial piece of evidence. Use some common sense. Why would his parents travel across the world to a third world nation (not cheap BTW) when his mom was 9 months pregnant? Why would they be in Mumbasa (if you believe Ms. Taintz document) 1000 miles from his father's home village? If he was born in Kenya, why would he have gone through his entire life without telling anyone; unless you believe everyone he did tell has stayed quiet? If he was born here it doesn't matter what his parents' citizenship was. Even the children of illigal immigrants are given citizenship if they're born here.
Attack his policies. I'm sure you have some serious idealogical and practical concerns over his policies. Well-articulated, these would merit debate. Ranting about birth certificates and socialism (not that us moonbats are above a good rant sometimes) isn't constructive for your party or the nation.
Okay I'm done.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:19 am
Well stephenberry, you did reply to me and you did lop me in with all the “birthers” by using “you” and “your”.
–”Yet you birthers persist in vile slurs and slanders against various and sundry politicians, government employees, journalists, foreign citizens, dead white women named Stanley, and anyone who disagrees with your decision to pout because a black guy beat a white guy in public and no one lynched the black guy.”–
I never said anything bad about Obama's mother.
Now I have said somethings you may consider vile slurs and slanders, but that is just a matter of being on the Left vs. being on Right.
You also went on to play the race card with “white guy and lynched the black guy”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:46 am
Only when the Jew arrives in Israel, applies for it and passes the local police inquiry.
Otherwise should have Israeli parents, who could apply on his behalf at the embassy.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:59 pm
Sarah Palin is about to write what is sure be a very popular and influential book (among conservatives anyway…the few that can read). And much like Hitler, Palin has an amazing control over stupid, racist people who vote against their own best interests every two years. Elect a politician too stupid to correctly pronounce the word “nuclear?” You betcha!
Pingback posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:19 am
[...] Obama hoax certificate based on South Australian certificate [...]
Pingback posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:53 am
[...] here for what might be the source of Pres. Obama’s fake Kenyan birth certificate — or, [...]
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:02 am
Real simple, are there other Kenyan birth certificates like this? Is so, then it is real. World Net Daily claims they have seen others and they are identical. They need to post these other birth certificates.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:10 am
This Kenya birth certificate is pure genius.
The Democrats have been able to cast us as cranks, and as the “angry right”. Add to the mix the racist emails and Twitters by staffers of Tennessee Senator Diane Black and SCGOP activist and former State Senate candidate Rusty DePass and it should be no surprise if we get massacred in 2010.
Between successfully getting us to chase our own tails and our shooting ourselves in the foot, they only have to get out of our way to win the next elections. Focus, people!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:18 am
The CIA has to approve security clearances for Senators on the Foreign Relations Committee.
The FBI does background checks of high-level Federal officeholders and judges. Don't you remember when they went to closed-door session on the 2nd day of the Sotomayor testimony (3rd day of hearings)? That was to go over the results of her FBI background check.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:21 am
You cannot be serious.
I brought Bush's skin color into the topic precisely because NO ONE on the left used Bush's race against him, but a LOT of people on the right use Obama's race against him.
There is a qualitative difference between racism and mere derogatory comment about someone's intelligence.
No, it's not so funny now. I am actually a bit sad for you. You're dumber than I thought if you really don't get any of this.
Ah, that's better. I see the humor in it again. I remembered that you're the stupid one.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:24 pm
You lied. Again. Before you stated “If you send me another message, I will look at that and that will be the end of our communication.”
You have not presented any evidence to your concerns about the President of this country. You just rant and cast doubt. The one “fact” you present in your arguement was shown to be wrong.
I present an article with quotes from someone who is clearly very religious….and a similar religion to yours….One of the 300+ recognized religions that consider themselves “christian”….Then you try to quote a book that I personally consider to be fiction…with references to some true events, as evidence to prove your point, even though I clearly state before I do not believe the book you quote is sufficient evidence….of anything.
“Jesus is God, but you do not yet comprehend that.”…..or maybe you do not comprehend that your belief may be wrong. Rememeber all religions disagree with each other. With so many versions of so many religions out there much more than 95% of people are bound to be wrong. The odds are not in your favor.
“It is not as in the Bible, that God created man in his own image. But, on the contrary, man created God in his own image.” – Ludwig Feuerbach
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:27 am
You continue to post things that demonstrate you cannot understand what you read.
I said “you birthers.” Unless you seriously contend that I mean a group of people is standing and speaking in unison with one voice, you understand that I am positing that “this group of people, of which you are one, says X.”
You have literally no idea what “play the race card” means. If you get your information from Fox News, I would not be surprised. Just because someone mentions race does not mean they are “playing the race card.”
Certainly, in your bogus Left vs. Right scenario, it would be absurd NOT to mention the fact that there were no racist attacks on Bush, but the overwhelming majority of attacks on Obama are race-based.
You call that “playing the race card,” don't you?
Stop putting gas in your car but keep driving it everywhere. When your car runs out of gas, just sit there motionless. If your wife opens her mouth, accuse her of playing the “out of gas card.”
You're really too simple for this conversation.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:53 pm
Just more SPIN. More Insults. As I said before the Left can dish it out, but it can’t take it.
You dished out the Race card twice, and you can stand being called on.
I feel bad for this country when there are people like you so willing to bring race into a discussion in ongoing attempts to belittle anybody who dares say anything negative about Obama.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:54 am
That's nice, but they still don't vet presidents. And you don't want them to. The FBI answers to the President. The CIA answers to the President and Congress, but that's speculative.
If you have the current President vetting out the candidates for President, then it would be too easy for the current President to eliminate the candidate of the opposing party, and give the candidate of his own party a pass.
The POTUS has security clearance by default. What? The FBI or CIA is going to deny the elected leader of the free world the security clearance to know the launch codes?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:00 pm
One clear way to solve this issue is to produce the original, signed copy of live birth, if it exists.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:14 pm
Why would Obama do that? This “movement” marginalizes it's supporters and distracts them from his health care initiative. The birther movement is a godsend, and I support it enthusiastically. I have been active at freerepubllic, pumping up the rubes and praying that no one produces a real Kenyan birth certificate. It will be a while before anyone does, because the conservatives hate to break the news to their followers, and their opponents need to keep this nut-log rolling as long as possible. I am that it's almost over, as there are now entirely too many smarty-pants (me included) are popping the bubbles, because the urge to point and laugh is too much to bear.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:22 pm
Classic. I feel sorry for the guy who posted his (never post your personal info online anywhere…don't even do online banking…too risky) because nutbags like this “Dr. Taitz” will use it against you. He was BORN IN HAWAII. The Clintons would have busted him if they could have, but they knew he was BORN IN HAWAII and didn't make an issue out of it. Cause he was BORN IN HAWAII. Jesus Christ Almighty Himself!!!! Drop it! Drop it! Drop it! the GOP and their Prayer House and a$$hole followers have got to move on. Go to your chili cook offs and Junior League crap and leave Middle America alone. Go away. Destroy yourselves like the Romans. Let the Trojan horse in and completely decimate yourselves you bunch of lying, paranoid, uneducated, hypocritical nutjobs. And the world will all collectively thank you for finally being gone from the planet!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:27 pm
More SPIN.
You replied to me with “you birthers”.
You did not reply to a group.
-”Just because someone mentions race does not mean they are “playing the race card.”-
Depends on how they mention or use race.
–”and anyone who disagrees with your decision to pout because a black guy beat a white guy in public and no one lynched the black guy.”–
In this case you did play the race card. Continuing to try SPIN it, only discredits you further.
This is what is wrong with this country. People like you will use accusations and implications of racism in attempts to discredit anything someone says negative about someone like Obama.
I will acknowledge that some people on the Right have said derogatory remarks about Obama with regard to his race. However, even a few on the Left have done the same.
One an example, came from none other Rev. Jesse Jackson when it went into a derogatory rant using the N-word against Obama. Yet, Rev. Jackson is the same man who has played the race card against the Right numerous times. Remember the entire flap over a cartoon where the cops shoot a monkey?
-”Stop putting gas in your car but keep driving it everywhere….”-
More blathering non-sense, nothing more needs to be said.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 12:30 pm
Ultimately, though, we have to recognize that the birther movement isn't about Kenya, or Indonesia, or Australia, or even Israel. It's about the fact that an intelligent black man is in the White House, and that scares the living crap out of racist hayseeds from sea to shining sea. They can't attack his education, they can't attack his diction, they can't attack his work record, they can't attack say any of the things that they normally say about black people they're trying to crap on (although I'm sure some bigot has pulled out the phrase “affirmative action President”) so instead, they're trying desperately to convince themselves that he wasn't duly elected.
Imagine what would happen if a gay President got elected! They'd be trying to tell us that the Constitution doesn't allow a President who isn't married (yes, I know we've already had one) or that he might get AIDS and bankrupt the country to boost his T-cell count, or they might just go to that old-fashioned fallback and try to kill him.
Amazing that people are so afraid of a charismatic, eloquent black man who actually managed to overcome the entrenched racist machine and get himself this far.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
“it was a Republican, Abe Lincoln who freed the slaves”
Yes, a liberal Republican. Such things used to exist.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:56 pm
–”And look at the same article for proof that “original vital records” refers to the electronically-stored data.”
——————
This is from the article: “”We don’t destroy vital records,” Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo said. “That’s our whole job, to maintain and retain vital records.”"
Which implies that “vital records” would be paper records, not electronically-stored data.
The above is followed in the article with this:
“”I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file”"
Which would seem to mean Dr. Fukino has seen the original paper records maintained on file; again not electronically-stored data.
The question is when Dr. Fukino says she has seen the original paper records, what are the records?
Is Dr. Fukino referring to:
a) “Certification of Live Birth”
b) “Certificate of Live Birth”
c) a filled out form dealing with births
d) something else / other / ???
Again, the problem with Dr. Fukino is she has been vague on details and I (and others) no longer will trust what she has stated. At this point, I (and others) want to have someone with credible legal authority and forensic document expertise (FBI agents for example) inspect the records and state what kind of records.
What does not make sense is why Obama has refused to release his Certificate of Live Birth. Unless there is something on the records that are personally embarrassing. Still he could block-out that embarrassing aspect, then release hi-res images.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:03 pm
You are aware that Kenya and Australia are both ex-British colonies, and that it is not especially surprising if official documentation was similar back in the 1960s?
The similarities between the names is a little suspicious but certainly not enough so as to prove this a fake.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:11 pm
“I believe your the racist.”
This from the guy with the screen name “KeyanMuslimsMakePoorLeaders”
Project much?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 1:12 pm
What a relief. Now Obama can get back to bombing peasants in Afghanistan and giving away American social services to illegal aliens invading at the Southern border while he pretends he's fighting an endless War on Drugs and War on Terror.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
I am sorry about the way I write, english was never my strong suit in school. But sorry to say I am one of those people that this government and there supporters do not like. I am a self made man with alot of money and I want to keep what I made with my hard work.
Pingback posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:34 pm
[...] Posted by wecogitate on August 6, 2009 One of my friends in the small community of Obama “birther”-debunkers passes on quite the discovery: a 1964 “certified copy of registration of birth” from Australia, easily available on Bomford.net, a genealogy site. There are striking similarities between this document and the one Orly Taitz is passing off as a “Kenyan birth certificate” for Barack Obama. Click Here [...]
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:37 pm
What the hell else do you guys want. The state confirmed the b.c. the newspapers of the day printed the birth announcement. Since he moved a lot, I doubt if he even knows where the original b.c. might be. I am 65 and mine had long ago been lost so to get a passport I sent to the state for a certified copy. That is what he has shown. So much time spent on this, Why? He had done what he needed to do. You guys would not believe anything I guess.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
Australia has been an independent Commonwealth since 1901. South Australia is a state.
Kenya was a constitutional monarchy at independence in 1963 with the Queen has Head of State represented by Governor-General Malcolm MacDonald, with Jomo Kenyatta as Prime Minister. At the time this birth certificated was dated, Kenya was not a republic (with an elected President) but a constitutional monarchy. Kenya became a Republic on 12/12/1964 when MacDonald resigned as Governor-General and Jomo Kenyatta became President. Also Kenya used the East African shilling which was subdivided into cents, not the British Shilling, subdivided into pence. So the currency is wrong.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:45 pm
The desperation of your arguments, the vehemence of your claims, and the steadfastness of your clinging to this ridiculousness is truly admirable. You are quite prodigious in your wingnuttery (not to mention your fuckwittery). Really, you all get an 'A' for effort. Judging by the extreme illiteracy, lack of basic reasoning skills, and refusal to accept facts, I'm pretty sure it's the first and only 'A' most, if not all of you birthers have ever or will ever get.
Keep it up though. Please. Not only is it entertaining as all hell, but it has helped to shrink dumbfuckstan to the point where we can safely snuff it out entirely and not really miss it. http://davidgs.posterous.com/dumbfuckistan-gets…
Thanks!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 2:50 pm
Is there going to be some kind of retraction on this? The Bomford birth certificate has been shown to be an amatuerish fake.
Anyone looking at the document closely can see that the text above the fold mark is not distorted at all – the text is layered above the image with the folds!
Then when someone showed that the document when brought into photoshop elements, it will easily find the layers in the document!
LOL
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
or maybe this is a standard form of the British empire as both australia and kenya were colonies?
why would someone hide all of thier records? He's hiding something . was he a D- student who got where he is because of affirmative action? A D- student, an F president.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:09 pm
I agree with you in part. This birther nonsense will make it easier for Democrats to keep the House and the Senate for the next few elections, but the only people fueling this thing now are conservatives.
Maybe both sides will get lucky in the next few weeks and see Orly Taitz permanently disbarred from what she considers the practice of law. Whether it's filing frivolous lawsuits, knowingly submitting false evidence to the court, talking to judges ex-parte, or making up the law as she goes along, she is a perfect example of how not to be taken seriously.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:14 pm
“and you can stand being called on.”
Yes, I can. But we’re not in a classroom. Who’s calling on me?
By the way, Mental Giant, I just got an email notifying me that you are now “following” me on Disqus. I wish I could say that I’m flattered. Always nice to have a new fan.
But I wonder why you thought you needed to “follow” my comments? Surely you have better things to do than read the name-calling, content-devoid ravings of an Obot libtard?
Please explain yourself.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:24 pm
Conservatives should cut out the middleman and start yelling “There's a niggra in the White House and no one's doing anything about it!”
Wait, I forgot…that's the theme for the Republican National Convention in 2012.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:26 pm
How many documents have you seen from former presidents? Obama has posted his birth certificate, issued by the state of Hawaii, NO ONE not even the president gets to choose what docs gov issues. Why not sue the gov to release whatever doc you want to see? The birther woman is an immigrant and she touts her citizenship based on documents issued by the same gov she thinks is a fraud, what a fraud!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
I have one issued in 1966, nowhere, nowhere near this crap!!!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:30 pm
I was right. You’re not serious.
“One an example, came from none other Rev. Jesse Jackson when it went into a derogatory rant using the N-word against Obama.”
The N-word that Jackson used was “nuts.” You should look that one up.
You’re right about one thing. Nothing further needs to be said.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:40 pm
I’m pretty sure that a 5 year old doesn’t think there’s an “e” on the end of “Santa Claus.”
Care to point out any specific item in my post that has been debunked, as you claim?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:50 pm
I posted a link to the Hawai’ian state government’s law directly confirming my point.
Your link is to a partisan blog that prominently and on its first page cites “The Center for Western Jounalism,” also known as westernjournalism.com.
I will stick with my delusional fantasy that Republican Hawai’ian state officials are telling the truth here.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:03 pm
Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution states, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president; neither shall any person be eligible who shall not attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United Satates.”
The addition of a grandfather clause in this paragraph says a lot as to the meaning of natural born. The first thing it says is that being born in the US is not enough to be natural born, otherwise the grandfather clause would not be necessary. The writers and delegates, having been born in the US, wanted to be eligible for the presidency, but most were the children of British subjects. Knowing that that eliminated them from being natural born and, thus, from eligibility, they included the grandfather clause which expired when the last person alive at the time of the ratification of the Constitution died. So, being a native born citizen is not the same as being natural born. If it were the framers would not have included the clause.
When asked to define natural born citizen, John Bingham, the author of the 14th ammendment which extended the bill of rights to former slaves, stated, “Any human born to parents who are US citizens and are under no other jurisdiction or authority.” The Naturalization Act of 1790, also passed by this congress, declared “And the children of citizens of the US shall be considered as natural born, provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been a resident of the US.” Neither of these definitions, one from US law, mentions birthplace, only the parents’ citizenship.
This concept of citizenship by blood as opposed to citizenship by geography is a concept with a long history in British common law. A law passed in 1677 says that natural born citizens are those persons born to British citizens, including those born overseas. Alexander Porter wrote an article over 100 years ago in which he declares that the framers drew upon this difference in the law of heredity and territorial allegiance to define a third class of citizen applicable only to the eligibility to hold the office of president. According to Morse, “the framers thought it wise to provide that the president should at least be the child of citizens owing allegiance only to the US at the time of birth.” He goes on to say that the the eligibility of the president “was scarcely intended to bar the children of American citizens, whether born at sea or in foreign territory.”
The concept of citizenship by blood also precludes the equation of natural born with native born as the latter strictly demands geographical requirements.
Many argue that Barack Obama was eligible to be a state senator and a US senator and could not suddenly be ineligible to be president, but that is exactly the case. If this premise were true, Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor of California, would also be eligible to be president, and it is established that he is not.
Barack Obama has proudly and publicly stated that his father was a citizen of Kenya. We know his mother was eigteen years old when he was born. These two facts make Obama ineligible to be president. No birth certificate is needed as proof, and it doesn’t matter at all where Obama was born. His father’s non-citizenship is all the law requires. He is ineligible from the beginning, meaning he is NOT the president and can be removed from office without any impeachment or trial, it requires only a ruling by the SCOTUS. HE is, in fact, a usurper, a pretender or a fake.
So why has Obama been shepharded into our highest elected office regardless of the fact that he is, according to his own statements and the law of the land, ineligible for that office? It is because those whose responsibility it is to insure the eligibility of the president, the SCOTUS, has chosen, in violation of the law, not to override the voters that voted for Obama. They are are cowards who violate their sworn oath rather than make an unpopular ruling. We are no longer a republic ruled by law, but, instead have become a democracy with rules made up as we go along, never to be written as law.
POSTSCRIPT: In each and every case dismissed by the SCOTUS challenging Obama’s eligibility the reason for dismissal had nothing to do with the merits of the plaintiff’s claim. Not once did the SCOTUS rule Obama was eligible or even consider whether he was or not, rather they dismissed each case on the technicality of plaitiff’s lack of standing to file the case.
> Subject: [washingtonindependent] Re: Is This the Source of the Forged ‘Kenyan Birth Certificate’?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:15 pm
Me thinks you’ve done a pretty good job of casting yourselves as cranks all by yourselves without any help from anywhere, other than perhaps the full moon. William F. Buckley was fond of saying he had rescued conservatism from the kooks. He seems to have declared victory over kookdom a bit prematurely!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:15 pm
As a Photoshop expert, the Obama Cert can be identified as a fake upon first glance… It's hilarious that this has gotten as far as it has! Seriously.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:44 pm
http://www.operationtyranny.com
It makes no difference anyway Obama is a facist and he will soon be dictator if we do not spead the word!
He could be born on the moon if we do not rise up and make damn sure we are heard
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:50 pm
Show the fucking birth certificate, until the the united states government is illegitimate.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:54 pm
A self proclaimed expert. seriously! Just like I believe everything Ozero says I believe you.
Do you have any facts or should we believe you because you are a democrat?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 4:58 pm
Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution states, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president; neither shall any person be eligible who shall not attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United Satates.”
The addition of a grandfather clause in this paragraph says a lot as to the meaning of natural born. The first thing it says is that being born in the US is not enough to be natural born, otherwise the grandfather clause would not be necessary. The writers and delegates, having been born in the US, wanted to be eligible for the presidency, but most were the children of British subjects. Knowing that that eliminated them from being natural born and, thus, from eligibility, they included the grandfather clause which expired when the last person alive at the time of the ratification of the Constitution died. So, being a native born citizen is not the same as being natural born. If it were the framers would not have included the clause.
When asked to define natural born citizen, John Bingham, the author of the 14th ammendment which extended the bill of rights to former slaves, stated, “Any human born to parents who are US citizens and are under no other jurisdiction or authority.” The Naturalization Act of 1790, also passed by this congress, declared “And the children of citizens of the US shall be considered as natural born, provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been a resident of the US.” Neither of these definitions, one from US law, mentions birthplace, only the parents' citizenship.
This concept of citizenship by blood as opposed to citizenship by geography is a concept with a long history in British common law. A law passed in 1677 says that natural born citizens are those persons born to British citizens, including those born overseas. Alexander Porter wrote an article over 100 years ago in which he declares that the framers drew upon this difference in the law of heredity and territorial allegiance to define a third class of citizen applicable only to the eligibility to hold the office of president. According to Morse, “the framers thought it wise to provide that the president should at least be the child of citizens owing allegiance only to the US at the time of birth.” He goes on to say that the the eligibility of the president “was scarcely intended to bar the children of American citizens, whether born at sea or in foreign territory.”
The concept of citizenship by blood also precludes the equation of natural born with native born as the latter strictly demands geographical requirements.
Many argue that Barack Obama was eligible to be a state senator and a US senator and could not suddenly be ineligible to be president, but that is exactly the case. If this premise were true, Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor of California, would also be eligible to be president, and it is established that he is not.
Barack Obama has proudly and publicly stated that his father was a citizen of Kenya. We know his mother was eigteen years old when he was born. These two facts make Obama ineligible to be president. No birth certificate is needed as proof, and it doesn't matter at all where Obama was born. His father's non-citizenship is all the law requires. He is ineligible from the beginning, meaning he is NOT the president and can be removed from office without any impeachment or trial, it requires only a ruling by the SCOTUS. HE is, in fact, a usurper, a pretender or a fake.
So why has Obama been shepharded into our highest elected office regardless of the fact that he is, according to his own statements and the law of the land, ineligible for that office? It is because those whose responsibility it is to insure the eligibility of the president, the SCOTUS, has chosen, in violation of the law, not to override the voters that voted for Obama. They are are cowards who violate their sworn oath rather than make an unpopular ruling. We are no longer a republic ruled by law, but, instead have become a democracy with rules made up as we go along, never to be written as law.
POSTSCRIPT: In each and every case dismissed by the SCOTUS challenging Obama's eligibility the reason for dismissal had nothing to do with the merits of the plaintiff's claim. Not once did the SCOTUS rule Obama was eligible or even consider whether he was or not, rather they dismissed each case on the technicality of plaitiff's lack of standing to file the case.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:01 pm
This entire forgery probably was an Obama plant made to make the birthers look foolish.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:08 pm
Orly Taitz is a agent deployed to destroy the legitimate issue concerning Obama's eligibility to be President first brought forth by attorney Philip J. Berg, a Democrat, former Assistant DA in Pennsylvania who is a life long member of the NAACP.
Taitz provides Obama with cover, where this case becomes but just a right wing attack that provides Obama with political sympathy at a time when his base is catching on to the fact that Obama is but a puppet of the Wall Street Zombie banks and a face lift for imperialism as he escalates us into further war.
Obama is a foundation funded operative designed to destroy the USA. Obama is a complete failure. He could have revived the American School of Economics of FDR, Lincoln, Henry Clay and Ben Franklin & Hamilton, against the banking interests of the free market Austrian School confederates and derivatives pimps that have been destroying the industrial capabilities of our nation through the false left right divide.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
1 Muslim men are usually circumcised.
2 The president’s mother was married to these two men.
3 Bill Clinton wasn’t convicted of perjury or anything else.
4 Obama is president. Your guy lost. Learn to live with disappointment.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:20 pm
If the government and Obama’s supporters don’t like self made men with a lot of money, how can they like Obama? He’s a self made man with a lot of money.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:23 pm
Real simple, are there other $100 bills like this? If so, then this one is real! Yeah, counterfeits never look like the real thing. LOL
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 5:25 pm
Glad to see that you are here to add an intelligent comment to the conversation. That's the best you came up with? It may be helpful if you scream at your interwebs talkie screen too.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:29 pm
Wow, that’s one of the dumbest arguments I’ve seen. By that logic, the one inescapable conclusion is that Joe Biden is behind the whole birther movement! If Obama is forced to step down, then Biden becomes president!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:50 pm
Ronald Reagan was a smooth-talking charismatic politician too. Lucky he’s dead, huh? We should stick to politicians who can’t speak well in public and don’t read books and stuff. Probably safer that way. After all, look at the amazing job the last occupant of the White House did.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:04 pm
1 Obama is duly elected and confirmed by the Electoral College. He is a natural born citizen and over 35 years old, the only two requirements set forth in the constitution.
2 A president can only be impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Inexperience and inability to lead aren’t crimes.
3 A president can only be impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors.” America is a free country and being a socialist isn’t a crime.
Get it into your head. Obama is the president. Not liking him isn’t grounds for impeachment.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:11 pm
They really don't need an assist.
Team Obama is simply employing the famous old political adage; Don't interrupt your enemy whilst he is shooting himself in the foot.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
He graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School.
In case you didn't realize it, Harvard doesn't award it's highest honor ranking to D- students.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:19 pm
“The FBI answers to the President. The CIA answers to the President”
and since the prsident during the election was George W. Bush, are you claiming he is in on this 48 year conspiracy?
Wow.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:20 pm
Yes, but Alan Keyes will be there, and that will prove that they only mean it in the most respectful and kind way.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:23 pm
Applying Occam's razor, which requires that we accept the simplest possible solution,
it becomes completely obvious that this is the work of a birther,
because they are so unfailingly stooooooooopid.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:24 pm
“another BC locked in a vault … that no one can see! “
You do realize that this is true for just about every American born citizen, right?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:32 pm
Wrong.
The parents of the writers of the constitution did not hold dual citizenship with Britain. George Washington was not a natural born citizen of the United States because he was born a British subject. He was eligible to be president because he was a citizen at the time of the adoption of the constitution. Natural born has always been interpreted by the courts to mean a citizen at birth, either by being born in the US or by being born to a US citizen. Obama was born in the US and his mother was a US citizen. That makes him a natural born citizen on both counts.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 6:56 pm
If you must be “natural born” to be eligible for the Presidency, does that mean that if you became separated from your mother by Caesarean section (which is certainly not a natural birth) you are not eligible to be President?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:12 pm
I agree with quark. Any group of people led by a woman to stupid to realize that Steven Colbert was mocking her doesn't need anyone else's help to look like dumbasses.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:18 pm
The only affirmative action President that we've ever had is Bush. Despite having the best education that money can buy, the man was a complete failure at everything he ever accomplished in life. If his daddy hadn't been vice president dubya would have been lucky to get a job shining shoes at the bus station. After watching him destroy the country for eight years, it's obvious that he was too stupid to make it through life without his daddy's money; it's just a shame that America is so much worse off because of his incompetence.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:19 am
Not exactly true. Obama has refused to request and produce the long form of the document (you know the one you and I have to produce to get a passport to the State Department) – i.e. something we or the press could hold in our hands. (The difference in past presidential elections were that all these birth certificates were equally available to anyone – but now access is restricted to the originals due to privacy concerns) The form “published” on the internet is not the physical document like McCain produced. Look, I believe he was born in Hawaii and is qualified to be president by citizenship from his Hawiian birth. Obama’s ego is getting in the way in just not producing it to end this silly story. But when one is in pubic office you waive alot of your privacy rights - public service is a fishbowl. I do believe the Governor of Hawaii affirming that the document exists. However, there are wing nuts who will never give up on this until they see the
actual document held out in some type of press conference. Obama appears to be of the school of thought that it is somehow “beneath him” to have responde to this – but all it does is fire up the wingnuts out there. The “birthers” are an interesting bunch – but bright lights always end talk of conspiracy. He should just produce the physcial copy of the birth certificate and be done with all this nonsense suggesting he is some type of “Manchurian Candidate”.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:19 am
“court-legal evidence that he meets the Eligibility Requirements as set forth in the Constitution”
That’s a COLB. Prima facie evidence. Ask Hawai’i.
Your hypothetical about the Left is demonstrably false.
When McCain’s eligibility became an issue, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were among the first to say that it should not be a factor in the election and they fully supported an Act of Congress recognizing that McCain is eligible despite having been born abroad.
NO commercials from MoveOn.org blasting McCain’s eligibility. NO Code Pink protests. Not even a lousy Huffington Post journalist running around asking Democratic Congressmen if McCain was eligible.
We just went out and out-campaigned your man. We didn’t try to disqualify him from running.
I will keep writing “Fail” until one of you birthers can earn a passing grade.
EPIC FAIL.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:20 pm
They seem to look foolish every day all by themselves. They are mentally ill. They are filled with hatred that a man of color is president. They are sad people who will never stop. They are the worst of the very conservative right wing nutters.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:22 pm
It is out there to see, if only you have the eyes to do so.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
Where do you get this information? Fox news.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:51 am
Steph, I honestly don’t have time to educate you. If you actually trust Snopes and Factcheck KOS and HuffingtonPost and the other questionable, left-leaning
sources you cite, fine with me, live in your fantasy world. I can take each of your points and explain the error in it, but I don’t have time to dig through the pile
and find your original post, and with currently approaching 1400 comments on this topic by now, I think every point has been made and remade several
times. You just aren’t paying attention, or maybe you just don’t care about truth. Nice catch on my hasty spelling error. Maybe I should drop one in every
now and then to see if you are still obsessed with them; I must have really struck a nerve. You are on pace to win the site spelling bee. If you were as
concerned with content as with spelling and grammar, you might actually learn something. I explained my motive for posting a one-time critique and
acknowledged the original error. Clearly the courtesy was wasted on you.
==========================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:52 pm
If Democrats forged it to fake Conservatives out, good for them. Americans have had 911 forgeries by the right wing designed to undercut legitimate facts about how Bush stonewalled the 911 commission, opposed setting up the 911 commission, tried to appoint Henry Kissinger to head the 911 commission up until Henry refused to disclose his Saudi client list – - Bush refused to read his CIA briefing about Bin Laden Determined to Strike and had Ashcroft over here making Thomas Chong his top priority – and anyone asking legitimate concerns about all this gets tarred with the fake, CIA-orchestrated phony conspiracies such as the one about how it was missiles instead of airplanes on 911.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:55 pm
Its a time of war, Conservative – so support the Commander in Chief – period.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 7:56 pm
Affirmative Action? I got 2 words for you Conservative: Michael Steele.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:01 pm
You forgot to mention that Mr. Berg is a 9/11 Truther. Kind of undercuts his credibility.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:04 pm
Thank you. That's one of my biggest pet peeves about birthers.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:06 pm
We ARE discussing a man who could not find oil in Texas or manage to run a baseball team when his only job was to shake hands and get money from his father's friends.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:09 pm
Funded by an organization, but which one: Opus Dei or the Illuminati? I'm a proud Stonecutter, so I know he's not being funded by us.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:10 pm
Agreed. The only way this gets funnier is if the birthers fall all over themselves proving that the Kenyan birf sirtifikat isn't really fake.
How do we know this Bomford character's mother wasn't sent to Australia when she was pregnant, just to lay the groundwork for this birth certificate to surface at the appropriate time to shout down any questions about Obama's legitimacy to run for President?
I think our GOP representatives need to set down their detailed, well-explained healthcare plan and get to work resolving this mystery!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:17 am
“Many argue that Barack Obama was eligible to be a state senator and a US senator and could not suddenly be ineligible to be president, but that is exactly the case. If this premise were true, Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor of California, would also be eligible to be president, and it is established that he is not.”
Arnold was not born in America. If he was, he would have run for President by now.
Where do you get your information? Lots of paragraphs, lots of legal assertions, no citations whatsoever, no links. Ever hear of the 14th Amendment, by the way? Just curious.
Actually, considering your obfuscation about Arnold, I’m not surprised.
There are various rules about natural born citizenship if you were born abroad. It gets into an analysis of whether your parents, or one of them, was a U.S. citizen and if so for how long.
But when you’re born here, there IS NO FURTHER ANALYSIS. If you are born here, you are a natural born U.S. citizen, even if your parents are KGB spies. (They would have to be diplomats, and thus not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, for you not to be a U.S. citizen who is eligible to run for President. Covert spies are not diplomats and are subject to our jurisdiction, else we would not execute them when they are caught.)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:20 pm
I'm not going to hunt down the post in which you made the following comments which I will quote – it would take far too long, and you're not that important.
“Do you ever write anything you know anything about?“
Indeed I do. Do you ever read anything that you actually understand?
“I will be glad to read it, if so.“
Liar.
“Until then, keep doing what you're doing.“
Refuting your foolish lies and half-truths? Will do.
“You're a breath of fresh air.“
Thanks. The truth is refreshing, isn't it?
“I never said YOU said anything about Obama's mom, stupid. I said 'birthers.'“
And you have included me as a “birther”, as you do in this very post from which I quote you, at the end. Nincompoop.
“If you need me to search the threads at this website to find the birthers' own revolting words, say so.“
Yes, I need you to do so. Have at it.
“You don't know the one drop of black blood rule?“
Must I repeat myself again?
“Wow. Even fucking Wikipedia knows that….“
It doesn't count if you yourself went and created that entry out of thin air, you know.
“'In its most extreme form in the United States, hypodescent was the basis of the 'one drop rule', meaning that if a person had one drop of black blood, he was considered to be black. New laws arose long after the end of slavery, such as the Virginia's 1924 Act for the 'Preservation of Racial Integrity', which defined as white a person with 'no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian.' “
Wowzers. You've just shown, via Wikipedia (that bastion of error-free information), that a particular strain of extreme racism in the United States considered a person to be black if he had “one drop of black blood”. Do I need to walk you through the fact that this does NOT prove that that extreme racism was accepted as law throughout the United States, nor that that extreme racism is NOW accepted as law throughout the United States? Are you really that clueless?
“You're too stupid to be interesting anymore.“
That's just crybaby wailing when it realizes it can't get what it wants. In your case, you have apparently realized you can't address, let alone refute, my points. And as far as “stupid” is concerned – well, let's just say your accusation is laughable.
“Apologies if I no longer take the time to give you specific personal attention.“
I hope that's a promise, because having to correct your multitude of errors and misunderstandings and falsehoods and juvenile attacks has been giving me a headache.
“I will continue to mock you generally as one standout in an all-star class of birthers.“
Whatever floats your boat.
“You're better off if I leave you alone. You need a chance to rebuild your self-esteem after getting your ass handed to you repeatedly like this.“
You seem to have an obsession with my ass. Pervert.
“Too bad there's no mercy rule on liberal blogs like there is in t-ball. Dumb. Ass.“
Impressive. I didn't know you went by anything other than “Doofus”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:22 pm
I have no idea where you get your information.
Your logic is specious and internally inconsistent.
The current President holds ungodly power over the fate of his successor.
The Office of the President can shape the outcome of the next election through the bully pulpit, for example. Just by deciding what issues to push (Bush harping about the war on terror, for example), the President can push the electorate into a debate that favors his or her own Party.
The President's Administration employs hundreds of thousands of people, some of whom are political appointees loyal only to the President and some of whom are careerists who have worked in government loyally to the American people, for decades.
It's this latter category that I WANT to believe makes up the professionals in the FBI and CIA who are tasked with background checks and security clearances.
You don't dispute, do you, that Senate Foreign Relations Committee members need special security clearance from the CIA to hear the foreign intelligence that it is the Committee's business to discuss?
The CIA and FBI both answer to the President. But both entities are involved in the Justice Department's evaluations of office holders or judges.
I most certainly DO want the people who run for President to have their backgrounds checked to ensure that they do not have, for example, ties to Russian gangsters or third-world religious terrorists. I want to know that they did not funnel money to South American paramilitary rebels before running for office, for example.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:30 pm
And since Obama is not legitimately President, he is likewise not legitimately the Commander-in-Chief. Period.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:30 pm
We speak the truth. Yes, I imagine you find that rather “peeving”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:32 pm
Interesting to note that you went to a heap of trouble for a guy who you claim is “not that important.” And you did so in response to a post that isn't even directed to YOU.
Wow. You have even more free time than I do. Can you pull some weeds for me?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:34 pm
No, I don't mind reading the truth. I don't even mind the birther conspiracy theory gibberish.
But I do find the anti-Amercanism inherent in being a birther and slandering your President and Commander in Chief at a time of economic peril and in the midst of two wars to be a tad off-putting.
I understand. You don't get it. It's ok.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:39 pm
It wasn't that much trouble, as I don't find you all that challenging. The “trouble” would have been trying to find the post of yours which I quoted, and I find that you aren't worth THAT much trouble.
I have more free time than you? Perhaps. But I refuse to touch your weeds. My hands are refined instruments and Internet weapons.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:42 pm
I got bored of dealing with the issues a long time ago. I still do post facts and cite to the sources of same, and I still do present my arguments using logic and reason.
But I cannot help mocking people who tell me their hands are “refined instruments and Internet weapons.”
Seriously?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:47 pm
No, not seriously. But my humour is known far and wide for being so subtle that no one recognizes it.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 8:52 pm
“But I do find the anti-Amercanism inherent in being a birther and slandering your President and Commander in Chief at a time of economic peril and in the midst of two wars to be a tad off-putting.”
Did you find the virulent anti-Bush rhetoric coming from the Left, also during a time of “economic peril” and “in the midst of two wars”, to be similarly “off-putting”? In any case, seeking to find the truth, and believing (rightly or wrongly, but SINCERELY) that the current President is illegitimate, is NOT the same thing as being “anti-American”. In fact, if anything, it is completely the opposite, in that loyalty to the foundation of America, the Constitution, transcends loyalty to any individual or group.
The issue should not be clouded with unfair claims of “anti-Americanism” or “racism”. The issue should be resolved on the merits of the evidence. And in this, Obama has been less than helpful.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:03 pm
Wait, I thought he was a Socialist? Which is it? A Fascist or a Socialist? Or a Communist? Is he a Muslim? Or following a crazy Christian Preacher?
You can't have em all, so for the love of all that's holy, pick one crazy theory and stick with it. (Socialism/Fascism/Communism are, after all, mutually exclusive).
Sorry to interrupt your nonsensical ranting. Carry on.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:11 pm
———–AUSTRALIAN BIRTH CERT PROVEN TO BE A FAKE ONE——–
This guy David Bomford is a TOTAL FRAUD !
1) His website is down – bomford.net
2) South Australian birth certificates don't look anything like a Kenyan one !
3) The seal at the top of the page is cut off so you can't see it very good. This is not the seal of the South Australia at that time. Funny !
4) Here is what a real Australian Birth Cert really looks like: see link below !
http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/2308687/posts
THAT MEANS SOMEONE CHANGED THE KENYAN BIRTH CERT TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE ITS REALLY AN AUSTRALIAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE. OBAMA SUPPORTERS WILL GO TO GREAT LENGTHS TO PROTECT THE FRAUD AGAINST AMERICA !
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:11 pm
The writers of the constitution were not born in the US. The “grandfather clause” has nothing to do with their parents. That clause was to allow people, like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams who were born British subjects to be eligible to be president. So to be clear, George Washing wasn't a natural born citizen because he was born a British subject, but he was eligible to be president because he was a citizen when the constitution was ratified. That clause has nothing to do with who your parents are. Do the birthers even read history?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:15 pm
Obviously, the Australian document is fake – after all, it's dated AFTER the Kenyan one :-) Never mind the fact that Kenya didn't become a republic until 1963. In 1961 it was still a dominion of Great Britain. (But facts are overrated as sources of *real* truth)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:15 pm
He's the president. He was elected. By the majority. I voted for him. You didn't. You lost. Get over it.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:22 pm
Austrian School confederates? The Austrian school people have been very critical of the economic policies of both Demoncraps and Rethuglicans – which are typically Keynesian. The “Austrian School” people do not like the Federal Reserve or Wall Street controlling the economy and our country. That's like John Kerry calling Bush a Libertarian back in 2004.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:22 pm
Yes, just another example of Obama's amazing ability to time travel. He went forward in time 2 years to have his “Republic of Kenya” birth certificate back dated to 1961. This is the obvious answer since in 1961 Kenya was a Dominion of Great Britain. And then, when it became apparent that the “secret” of his birth would be revealed by this damning document HE TRAVELED BACK IN TIME to post his own birth announcements in the Hawaii newspapers – cleverly listing his parents' address!
Mark – I've got this bridge I'd like to sell you cheap. :-)
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:23 pm
Except that the forgery clearly states “Republic of Kenya” at the bottom. And anybody with access to google could tell you that the Republic of Kenya was founded in 1964. Three years after the date on the forgery. You birthers are so desperate for facts to support your prejudice that you'll accept forgeries that a middle school student with an encyclopedia could disprove.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:31 am
Eh, it’s like talking to a 2 year old who has suddenly learned a couple of swear words.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:33 am
Please keep your perverted fantasies to yourself. Thanks.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:35 am
I know. But his supporters are apparently color-blinded.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:45 pm
i'll 'second' that thought, stephen. mr. droll (as he seems to think he's 'known', far and wide) you'd 'think, would be more looking to more assiduously apply those 'weapons' of his on more 'important' tasks/targets. typical. say one thing do another (after)'birther'.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:46 pm
May I call you Doug?
Of course I found any out-of-bounds rhetoric about Bush off-putting. Let's be clear: I don't care if you call Obama “stupid.” I don't care if you say his policies “suck.” But that's not what is happening here.
Take a look at a post I wrote on the “Birther Movement Dogs Republicans” thread two weeks ago – I think it sums up my view:
“One thing that ticks me off about this is that the birther thing distracts from national unity in a time of war by dividing us AGAINST our Commander in Chief.
Look at recent history. When Bush was put in power in 2000, people on my side were mad. They (and I) blamed a partisan Supreme Court and partisans in Florida for the outcome. But they, and I, put all that stuff aside whole-heartedly in the days after 9/11. It isn't just other countries around the world that supported America in the days and weeks after 9/11; Americans supported America. We rallied around the flag and we rallied around our leader.
Bush was our President and he had our full support to get the bad guys. Notice I said the bad guys. But anyway, we gave him our votes when he said he needed them for national security purposes. We let him manage the War on Terror in his Constitutional role as The Decider. Liberals and Republicans and everyone in between. Because we were at war.
Which brings me to my point. We're still at war. 2 of them. AND, unlike in the days after 9/11, our economy is shot to pieces and we need help. America needs help from Americans. Think about it. We still have every problem we had on Sept. 12, 2001 plus a whole host of new ones.
And, now that it's their turn, the fringe element of the other party won't rally around the flag as we did. The WHOLE element of the other party, won't for that matter.
And it's just un-American. So even if you guys weren't racist, which you are, you still suck.”
Now then, Doug, I completely disagree with what you say about loyalty to the Constitution. Birthers don't have Constitutional arguments. In fact they are trying to get around the existing laws, and claim that everyone in government is lying for Obama. Our Constitutional system supports the legal system. Obama has been a DEFENDANT in the legal system. Yet the very fact that he defends himself from suit is, to birthers, cause for suspicion and in fact, to birthers, evidence of wrongdoing.
Which of us is hiding behind the Constitution and which of us wants to see the laws upheld?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:48 pm
“Facts, schmacts! You can use facts to prove anything that's even REMOTELY true!” – Homer Simpson
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:50 pm
bender, prove it. it's that simple. well, NOT if you follow the trail of DISmissed cases of Taitz and Berg. but, saying it: “…not legitmately President…” don't make it 'so', so… 'pull a rabbit outta you hat' there moose and prove it. simple, even for an (after)'birther'.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:51 pm
His website is down because of the insane level of traffic. The site's server was unable to handle it, sort of like the TWI server these past few days. Haven't you noticed the glitches and multiple posts?
South Australian birth certificates don't look anything like Kenyan ones. You are right. That is what makes it so easy to tell that the Kenyan one is a fake, since it clearly was copied, right down to the pence, from the Aussie one.
If the seal at the top is cut off so you “can't see it very good,” then why would you profess to know what it is?
And what, by the way, are your credentials as a forensic document examiner? Better, one hopes, than those of “Dr. Ron Polarik,” who isn't really a doctor, is not named Ron Polarik and in fact is only good at doing market research. Of course, this is only true if you believe his lawyer, 9/11 Truther Phil Berg.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 9:52 pm
WB ken! Missed you, buddy.
So did the birthers. The Kenyan birf sirtifikat breathed new life into them. They've been born again.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:59 am
Go to Berlin and stand under the Berlin Wall until a brick hits you on the head, forever damaging your logical brain function and ability to present your thoughts in anything but a stream of consciousness that would make Allen Ginsburg and Jack Kerouac stay off the road for fear of being run over by a batshit crazy birther doofus.
Then come to America and start practicing dentistry until you spot an opportunity to make a quick buck fleecing the ignorant, the racist, and the stupid, none of whom will care that your law degree came out of a Skee-Ball game at an amusement park.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:00 pm
I thought you were just full of shit until I saw that reference to the NAACP.
NOW I understand why we should discount anything Berg says. He's a nigger lover.
Makes perfect sense! Thanks.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:02 pm
“Who robs capefish of their sight? Who rigs every Oscar night? We do! We do!
Who keeps Atlantis off the maps? Who keeps the Martians under wraps? We do! We do!
Who holds back the electric car? Who makes Steve Gutenberg, a star? We do! We Doooo!”
Excellent reference. If only you could verify that you have actually seen the Sacred Parchment, and not some lousy Certification of Sacred Parchment.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:04 am
Careful Bob. Mister Bender up there wants you to be the Sober, Dignified one, remember? You’re the designated serious poster. I get to drink and insult and call names. Next time, just don’t draw the short stick.
Because that’s the stick Dougie had up his ass until he sat down to post here.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:04 pm
'turths', bender, are provable. everything esle? opinion (charitably, BS actually).
http://www.humantruth.info/science.html
“…we must first admit that all thought is subject to personal analysis. It must be remembered that the whole scientific method serves, more than any other way of searching for truth, of removing personal bias and subjectivity. In that sense, science has proved itself to be by far the superior method of gathering facts about the world. No other system of thought has produced technology, accurate communications, accurate measurements and accurate predictions.”
“By all these criteria, the scientific method has shown itself to be the best way to counteract the shortcomings of Human delusions.”
____________
'opinions', like 99.9% (you guys if nothing, are 'pure') of (after)'birthers' are like assholes, everyone's got one, and everyone else's 'stinks'.
so, prove it. and/or in the meantime, spare us the 'stink' of your 'opinion'/delusion stated as 'truth'.
we KNOW it's all actually just about a black man occupying the white house. take a DEEP breath (after)'birther', you've got 3.5 – 7.5 MORE YEARS of 'dealing' with that black man in the white house. SUCKS to be you, you betcha! WINK !!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:06 am
Nope. You’re wrong about the comma rule. Pick up Strunk & White. Put down the birther literature. Breathe deeply. You made it.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:11 pm
You should have posted my whole post, rather than misconstruing it.
For example, JUST below the portion you cut out about the other birthers saying BULLSHIT about Obama's mom, I cited an example from RedGraham which was then at the top of the post.
So you were just deliberately misconstruing what I wrote. You're full of shit and not worth further time. However, I will donate any free time I can spare, when I'm not mocking other birther dumbfucks…
Here's the full post, doofus:
“Do you ever write anything you know anything about?
I will be glad to read it, if so.
Until then, keep doing what you're doing. You're a breath of fresh air.
I never said YOU said anything about Obama's mom, stupid. I said “birthers.” If you need me to search the threads at this website to find the birthers' own revolting words, say so.
Here, for example, is Red Graham, at the very top of this thread:
“Stannie didn't want the kid home all day and he had to be Indonesian for the school system to babysit him. Giving birth in Kenya, at least two uncircumcised third-world sex-partners, no wonder Stannie died of ovarian cancer.”
Ouch. Seems uncalled for to me, but then I'm not sick to my stomach about the President being black. DUMB FUCK BIRTHER DOOFUS.
You don't know the one drop of black blood rule? Wow. Even fucking Wikipedia knows that…
“In its most extreme form in the United States, hypodescent was the basis of the “one drop rule”, meaning that if a person had one drop of black blood, he was considered to be black. New laws arose long after the end of slavery, such as the Virginia's 1924 Act for the “Preservation of Racial Integrity”, which defined as white a person with “no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian.” This may have been in reaction to general social tensions of the post-WWI years, and to increasing agitation by African Americans to regain civil rights.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypodescent
You're too stupid to be interesting anymore. Apologies if I no longer take the time to give you specific personal attention. I will continue to mock you generally as one standout in an all-star class of birthers.
You're better off if I leave you alone. You need a chance to rebuild your self-esteem after getting your ass handed to you repeatedly like this. Too bad there's no mercy rule on liberal blogs like there is in t-ball.
Dumb. Ass.”
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:11 pm
being 'born again' is REAL popular with folks that keep fu*king up their lives. ask: Bush (drunk/druggie/mulitiple biz failures, oh yeah and completely fu*cked up America and the middle east! ) > Glenn 'Herr' Beck (drunk, druggie, suicidal [runs in the 'fam'], multiple wives), Bill Bennett (drunk, druggie, gambling junkie) …. Gingrich, Rudy, the list goes on and on and on so…
no 'surprise', i'm thinking about spending some time on planting some DISinformation 'mines' here and there to HELP them get second/third/fourth 'winds' . i must admit, a 'pleasure' in watching these 'little brains' get all 'breathless' and wound up when they think they've been handed [false] 'evidence', it IS 'entertaining.
is that 'wrong'?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:17 pm
LOL Now the birthers are turning on each other! Taitz is a secret Obot! So desperate to disbelieve the simple fact that Americans would actually elect a black man president.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:18 pm
truth? looks like 'douglasjbender', bender for short (perhaps ANOTHER 'do over' 'born again' type still hanging onto that previous addiciton, at least in name?) needs some help. let's start with his confusion/delusions:
“And since Obama is not legitimately President, he is likewise not legitimately the Commander-in-Chief. Period.” — “We speak the truth. Yes, I imagine you find that rather “peeving”.
and, now set the rulz:
_________
'truths', bender, are provable. everything esle? opinion (charitably, BS actually).
http://www.humantruth.info/science.html
“…we must first admit that all thought is subject to personal analysis. It must be remembered that the whole scientific method serves, more than any other way of searching for truth, of removing personal bias and subjectivity. In that sense, science has proved itself to be by far the superior method of gathering facts about the world. No other system of thought has produced technology, accurate communications, accurate measurements and accurate predictions.”
“By all these criteria, the scientific method has shown itself to be the best way to counteract the shortcomings of Human delusions.”
____________
'opinions', like 99.9% (you guys if nothing, are 'pure') of (after)'birthers' are like assholes, everyone's got one, and everyone else's 'stinks'.
so, prove it. and/or in the meantime, spare us the 'stink' of your 'opinion'/delusion stated as 'truth'.
we KNOW it's all actually just about a black man occupying the white house. take a DEEP breath (after)'birther', you've got 3.5 – 7.5 MORE YEARS of 'dealing' with that black man in the white house. SUCKS to be you, you betcha! WINK !!
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:22 pm
-”Birthers don't have Constitutional arguments. In fact they are trying to get around the existing laws,”
—-
That is where we are going to have agree to disagree.
Because us “birthers” are asking Obama follow the Constitution by bringing forth court-legal evidence that he meets the Eligibility Requirements as set forth in the Constitution.
Where as the anti-”birthers” are saying Obama does not have to prove anything, we elected him. Which also says they do not care what the Constitution says, because Obama is above the law.
IF Obama were a Republican, the Left would have refused to accept the Electoral college vote, refused to let him be sworn in, and would be doing everything in their power to Impeach him over the same issue.
All this lays at the feet of Obama and his supporters. Obama promised he would run an Open & Transparent government. So far Obama has refused to provide his “Certificate of Live Birth” and Obama's supporters have backed him. White House Press Secretary Gibbs has gone so far as to make fun of those who have raised the question. Which does not say a lot for their ethics and morals.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:27 pm
“A lawyer's primer: If you don't have the law, you argue the facts; if you don't have the facts, you argue the law; if you have neither the facts nor the law, then you argue the Constitution”
taitz, must have gotten a copy of the 'primer' from that online correspondence law school. that's what most of her arguments and the (after)'birther' 'jibber jabber' ('Early Cuyler* fav phrasing for cutting someone off) is 'based' on. wrongly, but that doesn't stop them cuz: a) the don't have the law, and b) they don't have the facts.
* Squidbillies > http://www.adultswim.com/shows/squidbillies/ind… Must C TV.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:29 pm
“And since Obama is not legitimately President, he is likewise not legitimately the Commander-in-Chief. Period.” – douglasjbender
That's the great thing about being a conspiracy theorist. Intellectual laziness that would put Bush to shame.
Where's the proof that he's not legitimately President? Oh that's right. You just assumed it and went on headlong from there.
As a birther, you don't need to prove a single outlandish claim. The world is your Accusation Oyster.
Pesky government official saying things you don't agree with? ON THE TAKE.
Official, authenticated document says something you don't like? FORGERY.
Laws written hundreds of years ago by slave-owning white men come out against your position? WHITE LIBERAL GUILT. WE NEED SOME SCOTUS JUDGES WITH THE BALLS TO REALLY LOOK AT THIS CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS.
Rules of physics prevent your claim from being even theroetically possible? EINSTEIN WAS A HOMOSEXUAL JEW LIBTARD. RULES WERE MADE TO BE BROKEN. TIME TO START NOW, UNLESS YOU WORSHIP YOUR USURPER MESSIAH.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:34 pm
Here's how I learned it, but it came from the backs of sugar packets, not no high-falutin' whiz bang electronic law school:
If you have the law, pound the law.
If you have the facts, pound the facts.
If you have neither, pound the table.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:42 pm
I prefer to be called “Douglas”.
“You should have posted my whole post, rather than misconstruing it.
For example, JUST below the portion you cut out about the other birthers saying BULLSHIT about Obama's mom, I cited an example from RedGraham which was then at the top of the post.
So you were just deliberately misconstruing what I wrote. You're full of shit and not worth further time. However, I will donate any free time I can spare, when I'm not mocking other birther dumbfucks….“
No, I was just in a hurry (I need to make sure I have time to pull some weeds), and I was greatly offended by your huffy tone and foul mouth and your APPARENTLY implying that I, as a “birtther”, agreed with the types of things you were accusing “birthers” of engaging in. I did not intend to quote your ENTIRE post – I actually didn't even READ the portion where you mentioned “Red Graham”. But that wasn't an intentional overlooking on my part. I think I was just skimming portions to find what I considered most relevant to refuting claims I felt you were making about me and others. So I was mistaken – you already HAD provided ONE instance of ONE “birther” making such an accusation as you claimed. Bravo. So I technically shouldn't have said you needed to hunt through this thread for an example (though it might strengthen your point if you could find MORE THAN ONE).
Like I said earlier, you are quick to judge, not as discerning as you think, and quite foul-mouthed and juvenile. You have misread and misjudged me. Much like you have the “birther movement” itself. But you seem to get a kick out of hating others and venting your hatred with foul language. Perhaps some day you will grow out of that.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:42 pm
–”we KNOW it's all actually just about a black man occupying the white house….”–
–”YEARS of 'dealing' with that black man in the white house”–
++++++++
Here we go again. With the race-card implication/accusation that if your against Obama then it is because he is black. The same old lame rhetoric that some (not all) Obama supporters have been using since Obama won against Hillary. Actually seen even before that when Obama & Hillary were still duking it out.
Congratulations you have lowered yourself to the very thing you are implying/accusing others of.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:43 am
OK, I don’t normally spend this much time on minutia, but
since you seem obsessed with picking at this nit:
The period and the comma should go inside the quotation marks;
however, this rule is often broken by novelists and journalists, usually
for effect. Commas are often inserted in phrases and clauses even
when not needed, usually for effect.
“To err is human; to forgive, divine.”
The dash, the exclamation point, and the question mark go inside
the quotation marks when they apply to the quote only. When they
apply to the whole sentence, they go outside the quotation marks.
Some people adopt a style based on the second rule and break the
first rule…they shouldn’t.
Happy now?
…Come up out of the basement, and put on some clothes.
Your ride to the “Romance without Partners” class is waiting.
=======================
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:44 pm
Nah. It's not wrong. Someone on this thread called it “shameless catharsis.”
Oh, and don't miss, further down this thread, randypuppy absolutely losing it over being taunted with the very same racist insult he tried to dish out to non-birthers.
I cannot decide which of my pet birthers is my current favorite. A few of them are getting a bit long in the tooth. Someone named “darpot” is now following my comments, according to an email notification I've received. You'll notice that darpot is the one who doesn't understand what “playing the race card” means, further down the thread.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:44 pm
Unlike kennethetucker, who has no sense of humour that can be discerned, and has found his “niche” here on this forum, where nothing that is said is really “important”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:46 pm
Yes, it's wrong. Taking pleasure in deception is a hallmark of liars and narcissists, which might explain your adoration of Obama and hatred for those who oppose him.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:48 pm
Note to kennethetucker: Please re-read my above post. Please ponder what “so subtle that no one recognizes it” might mean in the context of “not being serious” and “humour”.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 10:55 pm
Google “is the birther movement about racism” and this is what you get on the first page:
#
Is racism fueling the 'birther movement'? | Opinion | theGrio
But I was asked whether or not I feel that racism plays a role in the birther movement, so I will directly address that possibility. …
http://www.thegrio.com/…/is-racism-fueling-the-birth... – Cached – Similar -
#
Is President Obama's race behind the 'birther' conspiracy movement?
The issue of race has all but disappeared from the public discourse but racism may be what has spawned the birther movement. The embittered remarks by …
http://www.examiner.com/x-5890-Obama-Administration-Ex...… – Cached – Similar -
#
Politico 's Thrush: Birther movement is “a proxy for racism …
Jul 31, 2009 … When do we start a serious dialog about the Birther movement being a proxy for racism that is unacceptable to articulate in more direct …
mediamatters.org/blog/200907310013 – Cached – Similar -
#
The Birther Movement Gains Steam (It's just racism, of course!)
The Birther Movement Gains Steam (It's just racism, of course!) The American Prospect ^ | July 21, 2009 | Adam Serwer. Posted on 07/22/2009 4:54:03 PM PDT …
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2298717/posts – Cached – Similar -
#
The Birther Movement Gains Steam (It's just racism, of course!)
Jul 21, 2009 … I'm not sure what the ultimate consequences of the birther movement will be, either for the Republican Party or the country as a whole. …
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2298717/posts – Cached – Similar -
Show more results from freerepublic.com
#
The Birther Movement is Racism | buzz twang
DJ Lanphier is a filmmaker and writer in New York City.
http://www.buzztwang.com/2009/…/the-birther-movement... – Cached – Similar -
#
Did the birther movement spring from racism? – Susan Campbell …
I heard one of the “birthers” (and who made THAT name up) on NPR the other day. Talk about not so thnly veiled racism! …
blogs.courant.com/…/did-the-birther-movement-sprin.html – Cached – Similar -
#
Malignant 'White Hegemony' and Racism — Primary Driving Forces …
Malignant 'White Hegemony' and Racism — Primary Driving Forces Behind Backward 'Birther Movement'-. Posted on 30 July 2009 Bookmark and Share …
http://www.politicalarticles.net/…/malignant-white-h... – Cached – Similar -
#
Is racism fueling the 'birther movement'? |… – US Politics …
Is racism fueling the 'birther movement'? | Opinion | theGrio. … “The “birther movement” is an organized effort by individuals across the nation who have …
friendfeed.com/…/is-racism-fueling-birther-movement-opinion – Cached – Similar -
#
YouTube – Thom challenges Gary Kreep – Isnt the birther …
10 min – Jul 28, 2009 -
Rated 5.0 out of 5.0
Thom challenges Gary Kreep – Isnt the birther movement really about racism? ….. The ONLY reason John McCains' birth record was brought up is …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOWZdNoB-hs –
________________________
Got all that? Ok. Now stop whining about being called on your movement's racism.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:02 pm
What's more likely is that the purported Kenyan Certificate Certificate offered into evidence in court in California is actually the source of this hasty South Australian forgery done in a blatant but futile attempt to somehow discredit the Kenyan Certificate of Birth. Nice try, but the links to the SA document are already down and if the graphic file of that document is analyzed it will likely turn out to be a complete fraud.
Oh when we seek to deceive what a web of lies we weave – and the liars always get caught in their own web.
This whole affair is going to come crashing down on Obama who continues to refuse to discuss or release his original 1961 Certificate of Live Birth from the State of Hawaii. Obama has lost all credibility on this issue, and it can be presumed that he is terrified of the truth coming out which is why he and his minions are working so hard and desperately to hide the truth and instead create a whole series of lies.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:02 pm
–”Where's the proof that he's not legitimately President?”–
+++++++
You got it backwards. It is not up to “birthers” to provide proof.
The Constitution requires a President (current time frame) to be a “natural born citizen”.
By Obama refusing to prove he is a “natural born citizen”; he is saying the law does not apply to him by his refusal. Fortunately for Obama, so far no Judge has decided to ask him to demonstrate he is in compliance with the law.
If you do not understand this concept, trying getting on an Airplane without a government issued photo-id. A TSA agent does not have to prove you are not who you say you are. All the TSA agent has to do is say show me your photo-id or take a walk, because that is what is required.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:05 pm
“Like I said earlier, you are quick to judge, not as discerning as you think, and quite foul-mouthed and juvenile.”
RedGraham's post was THE TOP POST in the thread when I wrote. There are many other examples of cruel words about Obama's mom. Look at Tuci78's words, for example.
You are quick to judge ME. I've been posting here for two weeks. I've posted innumerable times and whenever someone presents facts, I counter with the same. I have carefully and politely explained my reasoning where requested, and carefully explained it, if not politely, in all other instances.
I have also cited binding U.S. law where necessary, and posted links where I've claimed that such and such is a rule.
I didn't accumulate over 230 points by being juvenile or profane.
You have 2 points. Come chastise me when you have two more orders of magnitude.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:16 pm
Oh thank God. I was afraid the birthers would give up and Democrats would have to go back to paying television stations to air anti-Republican commercials.
Keep up the good work!
Whatever you do, don't give up. And don't believe any news media. Trust your own eyes. Say it with me: “WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?”
Also, it would help if you could learn the words to “Nearer, My God, to Thee” and sing it outside of your local Congress representative's office while wearing a sandwich board that tells us which American battles your deceased relatives fought in.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:23 pm
“You got it backwards. It is not up to “birthers” to provide proof.
The Constitution requires a President (current time frame) to be a “natural born citizen”.
By Obama refusing to prove he is a “natural born citizen”; he is saying the law does not apply to him by his refusal.”
Wow.
No wonder you started “following” my comments, darpot. You need serious remedial education.
It is in fact up to the birthers to provide proof. Your side bears the burden of proof, both in court and in the court of public opinion.
As to the official court, all you need to do is examine any of the cases to see that you are wrong. Obama does not need to prove anything. His accusers do. They cannot do so, as they have no admissible evidence, and they don't have standing anyway.
Obama has the COLB, authenticated by Hawai'ian officials tasked by the government with doing precisely that. Thus, as the COLB recites on its face, it is prima facie evidence of any fact it purports to state. Look up “prima facie” and you'll find that prima facie evidence has two key features:
1 – it shifts the burden of proof to the other side, and
2 – if the other side cannot refute it, it is enough to allow the bearer of the prima facie evidence to prevail.
Obama has not refused to prove he is natural-born. He posted his COLB online a year ago. You're just ignoring that fact.
He's not acting above the law. He is being sued in federal court. He is defending himself in those suits. Pretending he did not have to respond at all would be “saying the law does not apply to him by his refusal.”
See, douglasjbender, I didn't insult darpot once. What do you want to bet darpot will just make the same gibberish assertions again?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:30 pm
Just searching for “is the birther movement about racism” and posting the results does not prove birthers are questioning Obama's eligibility because of race.
Taking a look at the links…
First two links come up 404.
Third link was some one like you making race accusations with no justification.
The fourth was about Sotomayor making race remarks.
The fifth link jumps to the conclusion it has to be about race because there are “no actual facts”, along with it being an “extreme right wing disinformation campaign”
The sixth link is 404.
The youtub link is to Liberal Talkhost who replaced Al Franken. In that talk, Gary Kreep states he is representing an African-American non-Republican.
I stopped listening at 5 minutes and 30 seconds when Gary Kreep starts making claims about the posted imaging being a “Birth Certificate”.
Given the results, it is clear you jumped to conclusions. Especially, when you didn't provide specific quotes, credible sources, and didn't even bother to listen to the YouTube video and point out the time period.
Thus Congratulations are in order. You just lowered yourself to the very thing you are implying/accusing birthers of.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:32 pm
Sorry but Obama was made not self made. I bet the truth be known the taxpayers paid his college but we will never know that either. So keep fooling yourself how great he is. Now the white house wants every one to turn in your fellow man if he disagrees with the President. We just became Russia. Thank you
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:41 pm
Did the taxpayers write his homework assignments and take his tests for him?
Did the taxpayers edit the Harvard Law Review for him?
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:42 pm
–”He's not acting above the law. He is being sued in federal court. He is defending himself in those suits. Pretending he did not have to respond at all would be “saying the law does not apply to him by his refusal.”–
He is not defending himself in those suits. So far all he has done is hide behind “lack of standing”. And his refusal to provide the evidence, does demonstrate he believes he is above the law.
Obama's COLB as you call it, is a Certification of Live Birth and does not prove he is a “natural born citizen”. As such, Obama has failed to provide proof. The fact a Judge has not asked him to produce his “Certificate of Live Birth does not mean Obama is not in violation of the Constitution. Obama could end all this if he would just be Open & Transparent…
As for the continued personal insults: Is it beyond your capability to hold a discussion with out acting childish? Okay that was a stupid question since you have already shown you can't. RoFL
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:43 pm
Heading out, so have fun playing by your self for a while.
Comment posted August 5, 2009 @ 11:53 pm
McCain's campaign also used “lack of standing” when sued by cranks.
Was he also acting above the law by USING THE LAW?
““We monitored the progress of these lawsuits against the Obama campaign,” said Trevor Potter, a Washington attorney who served as general counsel to the 2008 and 2000 McCain presidential campaigns. “The McCain campaign faced a series of lawsuits like this, too, alleging that he could not be president because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone. Both campaigns took the position that these plaintiffs lacked standing.”
But the flawed conception of the many “birther” lawsuits, coupled with the inexperience and foul-ups of “birther” lawyers, have only fed the frenzy over Obama’s legitimacy to serve as president of the United States. A survey of the lawsuits filed against Obama reveals a reliance on widely debunked rumors, bogus stories sourced back to web sites, affidavits from “experts” who refuse to provide credentials or even their real names, and frequent and blatant misunderstandings of basic constitutional law. The dismissal of “birther” lawsuits has allowed conspiracy theorists to believe that the information in those suits is accurate–a belief that manifests itself in the emails, phone calls, and town hall meeting rants that have pushed the theories into the mainstream media and the halls of Congress.”
http://washingtonindependent.com/52474/mccain-c…
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:00 am
Is water wet?
Your inability to look at links is your own problem.
Read the threads and then come back and tell us that it's not about racism.
Pingback posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:08 am
[...] many interesting facts about the supposed Kenyan Registration of Birth. First, the fact that it is almost an exact duplicate of an Australian Registration of Birth, even down to the same last names of officials. Or the fact [...]
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:26 am
“That's just crybaby wailing when it realizes it can't get what it wants. In your case, you have apparently realized you can't address, let alone refute, my points. And as far as “stupid” is concerned – well, let's just say your accusation is laughable.”
Funny. Your post doesn't come out as laughter. More like indignant bitchy whining.
Might want to enlist the aid of an English tutor to assist you with voice and tone.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:39 am
I posted this last week on another thread. This thread's discussion is a bit stagnant, so I'd like to find out what you think…
____________________________
Ok. Time out.
We know you birthers have fun here. It's amusing and cathartic to vent, pose questions you don't intend to have answered, and insult the collective intelligence of not only state and federal government and national journalists, but highly-paid professional campaign personnel tasked with doing opposition research. You may even get to sneak in a little overt evidence of racism or xenophobia or weird biases against Teachers' Unions (TV announcer: “you're against discount bus fares for war widows?” Lisa Simpson: “uh, you bet I am!”).
But I'd like to know, for my own information, just what you birthers really expect to accomplish in the near term (4 years) by dint of this birtherism thing. Note carefully that I said “expect.” So your answer cannot contain any of the following words: guillotine, deported, “massive coverup,” or Sarah Palin.
Naturally, this would be less fun if only birthers got to answer. So I throw it open to all, to take a REALISTIC look into the crystal ball and see what the birthers will accomplish. Your responses cannot contain the phrase “rum, buggery, and the lash” but that is because I just stole that phrase from a colleague here and my royalty payments will be for nothing if you rip off MY rip-off.
I'll go first.
I think the birther movement will do two things simultaneously, on parallel tracks.
First, it will force the base of the Republican party to solidify and harden around a false construct, like layers of pearl over a grain of sand. This grain of sand, an irritant, is the notion that Obama is illegitimate as ruler. It will never entirely disappear from the inner philosophical workings of the Republican party's base. So when the country moves on from this conspiracy theory, which I predict it will do in less than a month, it will force the birthers and Republicans in general instead to swallow something they don't want to digest. That is, not only is Obama legitimately President, but the country does NOT care as much as the birthers/Republicans do to have a Grand Examination of the Long Form. The rest of us are willing to be “duped” by numerous officials and nifty forgeries that are authenticated by “experts” and other associated white people. In other words, we fundamentally accept Obama's right to be President. They do not. Birth certificates and Constitutional implementing legislation has nothing to do with it. They just don't want him in the office, and any pretext at hand will suffice.
On the other, parallel, track, I think the country in general will recognize that the birther movement, crazy spectacle and easy target for mockery though it is, is nothing but a species of xenophobia and racism, and it is indefensible on any level. You can say crazy things about how global warming is a myth and polar bears really like swimming better than walking. You can cite to all sorts of right wing creationist websites to help back up your “Earth is only a day older than the Pyramids” theory.
But there isn't any body of evidence that supports the birthers. And so, as with the arrest of Skip Gates in his own home, when he was on the phone with his own home security company, after he showed his Harvard ID and identified himself as the home owner (never mind the 50 honorary degrees and the status as our nation's top black scholar — think about Stephen Hawking going to jail in a wheelchair for rolling into his own house and you'll begin to understand), people will look at this and say “if THIS isn't clear-cut, then what is?”
And so it will force us to take a clear look at how things really are in this country. In November a lot of us voted on the basis of what we WANTED the country TO BE. Whether you voted McCain or Obama, I feel that is true.
But not many of us were objective about what could be done. So now that President Obama continues certain executive privilege-oriented decisions of the former Bush Administration, and dawdles about closing Gitmo, etc., we find ourselves accepting certain political realities. Blue Dog Democrats will be the ones to stop health care, if anyone does. It won't be Michael “I don't do policy…I'm here to set a tone” Steele and the Republicans.
But we have yet to accept, in my view, racial and socioethnic realities. Face it, as Charlie Pierce from the Boston Globe said on Countdown tonight, “there's a nasty stew of racism and xenophobia at the bottom of this [birther issue]. I don't think there's any doubt about that.”
[bear in mind I originally posted this last week]
But a lot of people are invested in pretending that either it's not racism at all, or just that there is no way to be sure (in other words, there's doubt about whether there is in fact racism and xenophobia at the bottom of this issue). And I think those people will have to accept reality as they see the Ziplock Bag Lady With Better Veteran Relatives Than Your Veteran Relatives Because Her Veteran Relatives Fought In The Same Battles That Yours Did.
I don't think this will have stark political consequences at the Presidential level, other than to make Independents feel that much less comfortable voting Republican. Of course, there's not much reason for an Ind. to vote R these days anyway… I think it will raise money for both sides, but a LOT more for Democrats.
Ultimately we will look at birtherism as a footnote to history, an unpleasant QED to the question whether racism still exists in the 21st century. An example of the fringe who would say anything at all to avoid accepting reality. President Obama, after all, put his b.c. up on the web to dispose of a fringe-driven controversy about whether his middle name is actually Mohammed or Hussein. (You'd think the guy would have made up a name like “Winston” if he was gonna make it up — BIG leap all the way over to Mohammed, huh?)
Ok, I throw the floor to you as I resume the search for a tutor for my friend the test-taking assassinator, Tuci78.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:02 am
darpot the Grown Up Somber Debater is steadfastly denying that birthers are racist.
I posted the following response. It should apply to any of you birthers who come here and get sensitive about being called out for being what you are:
“Is water wet?
Your inability to look at links is your own problem.
Read the threads and then come back and tell us that it's not about racism.
You might look at my post referencing what Charlie Pierce from the Boston Globe said on Countdown recently: “there's a nasty stew of racism and xenophobia at the bottom of this [birther issue]. I don't think there's any doubt about that.”
Or look at what Jonathan Martin of Politico said on Hardball last week, talking with Matthews and Lois Romano:
“ROMANO: You know, Chris, I think you‘re on to something there. I think the far right has picked up on all these racial overtones. You know, I did a piece on Michelle Obama, I guess, a few weeks ago. It had about 400 comments on the Internet. And some of them were so vile, we had to take them down. They were so racist.
They know they‘re hitting a core segment of society. And they‘re trying to inflame these racial feelings.
MARTIN: Right.
MATTHEWS: Your thoughts, Jonathan? Why is party politics—we know he‘s African-American. That‘s fact, manifest from the day we first met him in his big speech. Why is it news that they‘re playing the racial card the way they‘re playing it?
MARTIN: Well, the birth certificate offers a certain segment out there some degree of reassurance that this country didn‘t actually elect somebody who is African-American. Look, it‘s not even thinly veiled. The whole birth certificate issue is totally driven by this sense on denial by this small fraction of American society. They can‘t except the fact that he‘s our president, so they‘re grasping at this, even though, obviously, it‘s totally debunked. Of course it‘s about race. They don‘t want to accept—
MATTHEWS: So it‘s not about documentation? It‘s about pigmentation, is that what you‘re saying?
ROMANO: It‘s about race and it‘s about patriotism. It‘s just a take on what the far right has always done. It‘s this whole thing about when they call—they said John Kerry looks French, and they questioned John McCain‘s commitment to his country. It‘s putting doubt in people‘s mind about people‘s loyalty and who they are. “
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32218822/ns/msnbc_t…
I suppose you'll say he's lowering himself, too? I could give you the same quote from many other respected journalists. But it's boring and pointless. So I made the same point by showing you just ONE page of a simple Google search.
After all, I just gave you the FIRST page of google links. If you need to see 200,000 cites to satisfy yourself, fine. But you're in denial.
I've argued again and again with racists who came in here with pretexts before admitting their real problem with Obama. I'm amused that you would even try to deny it.
So spare me the gibberish about what those links say. Stop denying that water is wet just because I didn't rub a wet finger right under your birther doofus nose.”
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:05 am
Not being one, I have no idea what the “birthers” expect, but every American citizen has a right to receive assurance that the man occupying the office of President of the United States is legally eligible to hold that office and to know whether he is a liar and a fraud. No such assurance has been provided. He has proven himself to be a liar and a fraud by means of his campaign promises vs. his policies and even his speeches to this very day, so why should his legitimacy be taken based on promises backed by nothing but forged or locked up documents? Why has Mr. “Transparency” sealed all of his records and spent millions of dollars to hire lawyers to fight every inquiry? What is he hiding? Why are you so obsessed with being his protagonist? Are you a member of his new snitch brigade yet?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:08 am
You sure get bent out of shape a lot over postings “where nothing that is said is really 'important,'” Mr. “I prefer to be called Douglas.”
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
If you don't like it here, find something more constructive to do with your time. Maybe you can help Orly find the REAL fake Kenyan birf sirtifikat.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:10 am
You certainly are a birther. A Paulbot Troother too, I'll bet.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:12 am
I think the stick up your ass has a stick up its ass.
How do you manage to type while sitting down? You must have to stand upright and perfectly still.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:12 am
So then Obama went to college as an American? How do you explain the passport to Pakistan? Indonesian namechange that was never changed legally back to Obama? The Jews are God’s chosen people. Israel should start bombing moslems again. Our Comrade-in-Chief is Hitler incarnate not the messiah. The Obama kool-aid drinkers are the ones we should be worried about. I’m sick of being tolerant of the anti-birthers. First they ignored us, then they ridiculed us, now they are fighting us, what next?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:14 am
Wow, Stephen. You're a true fruitcake. I mean really, you are so off track it's laughable. You not only can't stand the truth, you have obviously obsessed about it a very long time because you want to make sure you have a believable argument against it. The problem is, you have only your own mind and all those voices in there to tell you if it's a good argument or not. LOL It's really hysterical!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:15 am
Wow Mark, you're really smart! (sorry, that should probably read 'your real smart' so you understand it). So, by this kind of logic:
1) Birds can Fly
2) Cats eat birds
THEREFORE: Cats can fly.
Well done Gomer. You may not have been smart enough to get that GED, but I'm pretty sure you can still get a law degree from the same box of fruit loops from whence Orly Taitz got hers. I suggest you get right on that.
Jeebus, the stupids! It burns!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:22 am
“but every American citizen has a right to receive assurance that the man occupying the office…”
Okay. Let's flesh out what you mean by “assurance.” I saw his COLB online. I read the words of the Hawai'ian officials confirming that the COLB's information is the same as what the original vital records say: he was born in Hawaii.
I don't need further assurance. And I'm not entitled to any. You don't have the right to make a sitting President show you, a private citizen who isn't even suing him, his birth records. Those records are private. Laws prevent you from marching to Honolulu and demanding to inspect them.
Even if they weren't private, you have no legitimate interest in seeing them, unless you have proof that his COLB is forged.
“Every American citizen” does not have the right to make Obama bring his birth certificate to their front door so they can sniff the parchment and rub it to see if the ink is dry.
Your turn, PontiusPilate.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:28 am
Breathe.
People like you.
It's okay that you have utterly no argument to refute anything I have written.
You're a good person and people would have come to your birthday party if the invitations had been sent further in advance.
Get back in there and give 'em hell, tiger!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:29 am
The surest sign a debater is losing is his resorting to the device known as “ad hominem attack”, which you use almost constantly when a legitimate argument defeats your position. Spirited “jabbing” is one thing, and it adds spice to the debate; constant, crude, vicious attacks detract from it. Time after time you ignore the point and attack the individual. Reply to my post or defend your argument, as others are doing. By the way, I have no idea what a “Paulbot Troother” is, but apparently you do, and clearly you used it as another “ad hominem attack”.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:42 am
1. Usually.
2. First guy already had a wife. She gave up her citizenship for #2 who adopted little Barry.
3. So why did he lose his law license?
4. Obama(Soetoro) is illegally in the Whitehouse and I am never going to be content with that but anti-birthers obviously don’t mind.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:50 am
Please point us to a “legitimate argument” made by any birther.
Take your time. We'll be here.
When you get back, I will point you to a post made either by mantis or myself that refutes it.
And then I'll get back to calling you names for shits and giggles because you're disingenuous, slow-witted racists.
As I said, there's no rush. Take your time. You cannot fix stupid.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:58 am
David!
I'm surprised at you.
You're using ad hominem attacks.
Just because the birthers come in here and slander the sitting U.S. President without evidence; slander the Hawai'ian state government's veracity without evidence; mock the virtue of the President's mother without evidence; and spew racist bile about the President and his army of brownshirts and Obots…
does NOT mean the birthers do not have delicate sensibilities that you should be respectful of.
Tend to these birther dumbfucks as you would a hothouse flower.
Shit. I did it too. Well, at least stay vigilant. We know that truth is not as important as manners.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:00 am
Until the truth is not on your side anymore, at which point it's the other way around. Or something like that. I have to go huff more glue so I can think like a birther … be back in a bit.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:02 am
Please. Read this.
http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualin…
Number 1:
The Short Form is the ONLY document available. There's no such thing as a Long Form in the State of Hawaii. Quoting from the link above.
“the Health Department “does not have a short-form or long-form certificate.”"
Number 2:
There is a notice in the Hawaiian newspaper that says a boy named Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu that day.
Number 3:
What do you mean a Certification of Live Birth does not prove that he is a “natural born citizen”? The document provided by Obama is OFFICIAL and recognized nationally in the US as a legitimate proof of citizenship! What more do you want? the Long Form Certificate? Please see Number 1.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:05 am
Amen. I see you have “met” the esteemed stephenperry, purveyor of truth and filth in equal and mixed measure.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:06 am
James, I know you mean well.
But giving facts to birthers is like feeding Gremlins after midnight.
You obviously must have seen my (admittedly juvenile and profane) attempt to parcel out facts to Grown Up Somber Debater before you made your own attempt to do the same (minus the profanity and childishness).
Ah well, you're a brave soldier. Carry on.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:06 am
At least he doesn't refer to your ass in every other post.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:08 am
Ehm… where's the one from South Australia? On that link, there's one from NSW, one from QLD, one from VIC.. where's the one from SA?
Also, ABC from Australia actually interviewed David Jeffrey Bomford. But I guess that he's a fake too. Him, ABC and Obama people are in this together!! :)
IF a long form is produced, what makes you think that you will not say that the long form provided by Obama is a fake??
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:08 am
I pray you are a chatbot, and not a real human being, because the latter would be, well, quite disappointing.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:08 am
Still stuck on 2 points, eh, Douglas? Oh, sorry. Mister Bender.
Keep trying. You'll get another point someday. Not likely by being snarky, though.
Too juvenile, when you get down to it.
RoFL
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:10 am
wow… JUST when i beginning to think these (after)'birther' little brains couldn't POSSIBLY 'dig themselves in any deeper' this… wow.
so, NOW these delusional racists are claiming the forgery was done by some Obama supporter to 'protect' the fraud???
wow… break out those BushCheney illegal wiretap/surveillance tools and tap this guys line, bug his computer, intercept his cell phone freq, open his mail and swoop him up for internment. he's got us ALL figured out, comrades! ROTFLMAO you fu*king TOOL, Mark.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:11 am
Sure, there are some racists who resent Obama being President. And they would NATURALLY latch onto the Birth Certificate issue. But that is FAR from proving that the issue itself is the result of racist attitudes. Learn to think, stephen.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:12 am
Wait, who has been referring to my ass? I just have missed that. I was too busy reading your serious and well-thought-out factual assertions backed up by impeccably objective sources.
I will do my best to notice all such references to my ass in the future, Mister Bender.
Meanwhile, please do point me to some evidence that would support ANY point you wish to advance. I will be delighted to bargain with you in the marketplace of ideas. I'm just waiting to see something besides whining from you.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:14 am
“Points”? Is that sort of like what you get when playing a video game? Sorry, but if amassing “points” on a liberal blog like this which draws such impressive intellects as yourself and kennethetucker requires using foul language as freely and easily as the two of you do, I think I'll carry my two points with pride, and hope I do not gain any more.
And I wasn't being “snarky”. I was being sarcastically truthful.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:14 am
:D
I'm still charged up at the moment. But I bet in no time, I will resort to childishness and sarcasm as well
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:15 am
Hey Ken — we have a d2i alert!
Now all we need is Florida Christian. He's probably on a missionary adventure to Mombassa by now to bring back Pat Boone and his pet dinosaur.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:16 am
Again you err.
“I saw his COLB online” — nope, you saw the debunked, fake, posted COLB, but even if he has a genuine one somewhere, he could have been born on MARS and received one. His half sister Maya, indisputably NOT born in Hawaii, has a Hawaiian COLB. How did she get hers? The COLB posted online lists his father's race as “AFRICAN”. African is not even a recognized designator of country of origin — Africa is a CONTINENT. In 1961, his race would have been listed as “NEGRO”, or “MIXED NEGRO CAUCASIAN”.
“I read the words of the Hawai'ian officials confirming that the COLB's information is the same as what the original vital records say: he was born in Hawaii.”
Wrong again, she parsed her words carefyully to give that impression. In fact, by even saying what she did, she violated Hawaiian law about disclosing such private information — and she issued statements TWICE. If she was willing to break the law to HIDE the birth certificate from legitimate inquiry, why didn't she just release it? Doing either was illegal, but one protects Obama and the other attempts to dissuade others from examining it. Even CNN and World Net Daily published the “official” statement from Hawaii's health director, Chiyome Fukino, who claimed to have seen “original vital records” that prove “Barrack [sic] Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen.” …she couldn't even spell his first name correctly, and she did not state the specific document reviewed, and she was NOT under oath. Will she be more specific is she has to testify under oath in court? Was it the actual long form certificate, was it the record from the hospital with the attending physician who delivered him, or was it just a record of his birth submitted by family to obtain the COLB or a summarized listing of every birth recorded on Aug 4, 1961 for which accompanying requests for a COLB had been submitted? All that was required to obtain a COLB was a statement from an adult saying that the birth took place…no proof required. There is NO information about WHERE, which hospital — both hospitals have denied they have any record of Obama's having been born in their hospital — the attending doctor, or any of the specifics needed for proof. The COLB would lead one to believe the named party was BORN in Hawaii, but as has been disclosed and verified by numerous others who also have Hawaiian COLBS, including his sister Maya, that is NOT a requirement to obtain a Hawaiian COLB.
One refutation is enough to prove you really don't have any original evidence or ideas; I gave you two. The rest of your post doesn't even deserve a reply if you don't understand the rights of American citizens to KNOW that the President of the United States is legally eligible to hold that office.
Do you just read the Obama talking points and regurgitate them?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:19 am
Fortunately, Mister Perry, no one has been referring to your ass. That's not what my post was regarding; rather, I was making a reference to YOUR habit of obsessively bringing up MY ass in every other post of yours.
I would love to point you to some evidence that would support my points, but I have already tried, and your response is to ignore, misrepresent, mock, insult, and use foul language. I assume that even you would recognize that after awhile such responses would result in no further evidence being presented. “Pearls before swine”, you know. (By the way, that's a Biblical reference.)
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:28 am
You are becoming incoherent, and you keep attributing ideas to me that are not mine. Let the courts decide which arguments made by any party are
legitimate. The mystery surrounding the legitimacy of Barack Obama to hold the office of President of the United States warrants an investigation and full
disclosure. It was important enough for the Congress to investigate John McCain, clearly a natural born U.S. citizen, so it is certainly equally important to
fully vet Barack Obama, the “transparent” obfuscator. The rest of your post is more juvenile rubbish, and you are boring most of the adults participating in
this discussion.
==============
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:34 am
Time for Fun With Birthers, my favorite part of the comedy show that is this website.
We will start with RandWulf and then move on to d2i.
First, randypuppy.
Some of you may wonder why I persist in telling him about monkeys. Sit tight. All will be revealed.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:35 am
Here, for your reading pleasure, some exemplary and profoundly mature writings by the esteemed monkeyfucker known to us all as randypuppy…
This appears on the “Birther Movement Dogs Republicans” thread, 2 weeks ago, from Randwulf. No word on whether he was being touched by a monkey as he wrote:
“Wow. Well, I may have to re-think my earlier assertion that I am (or was) a “good American”. After reading all of this drivel today, I am totally convinced that it's all a lost cause. What a bunch of TV inspired SMARTA$$ES. American is done. At least 52% doomed. The monkey majority is now running the zoo. What made the US a great nation is gone. What has always been it's main weakness now is a dominant force. You're all (or at least 52%) brain-washed main-stream-media zombies. All you can see is your stupid little Demican/Republicrat world. You are all (DEMS and REPUBS) controlled by forces you can't see and don't understand. Just a bunch of stupid Goyim. You really don't deserve a country any more. Go ahead. Self destruct. Whatever. There's no way to fix it. You're fat. You're stupid. You're ugly. You're misbegotten and badly bred. You have no morals. You have no courage. You have no work ethic. Your kids can't read. And if they could, they'd read garbage. They don't know math. They don't know science. They know no real history. They only know how to dress like “gangsta” and talk jive. They are filled with “political correctness” though. Great. Fine. The end.
Rome took a couple of centuries to go from a world super power to a decadent, powerless, mish-mash shithole. We (or you rather) will accomplish the same feat in a couple of decades. I secede. I don't want anything to do with you mongrel, perverts. Just keep printing up that funny money and throwing it around like idiots. More national debt will only hasten the decline. You all deserve the lying, crooked and evil government you have allowed to be created here. And now you can just sink into the $hit with it. If you listen very closely, you can hear the Gods, and the rest of the world laughing. Disgusting monkeys.”
After reading his post, Road Scholar posted the following:
“Well. After your 'monkeys' and 'goyim' rant, I retract my retraction.
You're an asshole.” –Road Scholar, 2 weeks ago.
Never at a loss for words, although occasionally at a loss of a badly-needed change of women's frilly underwear, Randwulf retorted as follows:
“Well I'm just all broken up about your “retraction”. And as far as being an “asshole”, you ain't seen nothing yet! I don't need your f@cking approval. I've EARNED my right to say what I think. I was a part of your sick system for years. I want nothing more than to see it all fall and burn now. It's like living in a ghetto. The best thing that could happen is for a bulldozer to just scrape it up and bury it in a landfill, detox the land and start over again with something useful. You all like to say that if we don't like Obama, it is just because he is Black. You never talk about the percentage of Black voters that voted for him being 95%. I'm pretty sure they voted for him in those numbers entirely BECAUSE he is Black and not so much for any other reason. Sounds pretty “racist” to me. The only reason no judge has yet ordered his records produced in one of these lawsuits is that none of them have wanted to be the one who initiates the race war that will surely ensue once that is done. I don't give a $hit! I say LET ER RIP! It will be more fun that fishing with dynamite!”
Just figured you could use a little context, since on the “Surprise! Orly Taitz Still Lying…” thread, randypuppy offered his “Dissertation on Birther Morality and other Oxymorons.”
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:36 am
Part 2 of randypuppy's dissertation is about “Race, Racism, and Racists: Time To Fling Poo At the Zoo.”
I present here a little compilation of racist quotes I slapped together after reading some of randypuppy's lighter works… And his delightfully mature response follows… Note that he's offering to put steel up all of our asses. No word on whether he intends to clean his own feces off said steel first or not…
_________
“Birthers are racist.
For those who say birthers aren't racist, I present here a few quotes from Randwulf. They all appeared on one 109 post thread. I haven't bothered to look at any of his racist comments made in other threads, like the one with 2,869 comments. If you fuss about it someone will compile a master list including comments from others as well, and prove you that much MORE wrong.
Oh, and he also gives away birther philosophy. So this is a Birther Rosetta Stone. Every other word after this sentence is a direct quote of Randwulf, and the last quote is a nod to Florida Christian, so enjoy!
“I think he is an Indonesian wetback, an illegal alien in every sense of the word.” [posted twice on same thread, days apart]
“Monkeys are experts on where to find nuts. Aren't they ALFTURD?”
“Monkeyf@cker.”
“Yes like when you call me a “racist”. Turnabout is fair play MONKEYF@CK!”
“But, its all good. Laugh away. Eat bananas and fling pooh! The monkeys can never run the zoo for very long before more advanced primates must move back in, hose down all the $hit and restore order. Looking forward to that!!”
“Wack-a-doodle? Hmm is that some new kind of mongrel breed or something? Why don't you guys run one of them for office! Oh and this time, make sure he has all his records, so we don't have to go through all this again.”
“I don't remember mentioning race at all, so it is you “making it clear” that I must harbor “racist” sentiments.”
“Man have I got a list of who's been naughty and who's been nice. Got ammo?”
[Birther Philosophy revealed below!]
“Whatever they have, we want to see it. We won't stop until we have it. Argument over it is pointless. The original documents will tell all. And then we will go for all the rest of the documents that he refuses to release.”
[Florida Christian Alert!]
“This whole sick episode would have been laid to rest long ago if…”" -stephenperry, 1 week ago
_______
And, his witty retort to me:
“Thankyou!! That was all ME! I freely and proudly take credit for all of it. I stand by all of it. I am right in saying all of it. And the best is yet to come because I am getting some really good original source material to endorse my claims and statements. So have a banana and wait. I will not be long. Don't cross swords with me. You will all end up with steel up your asses. COPY THAT?” –randypuppy the monkeyfucker, 1 week ago
So, this is a bit of background between the two of us. It explains why I do my part to establish commonality with randypuppy by talking to him in words he understands.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:37 am
The COLB was never debunked. In fact, it was affirmed as real by Hawaiian officials and people who put their hands on it at FactCheck.org. As well as corroborated by 2 Hawaiian newspapers on the day of his birth.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in…
I'm sure you've seen that 100 times by now, but how you can still insist that something that has been carefully examined by multiple third parties is fake, while immediately accepting the forged Kenyan (and yes, it's been proved fake and admitted to be fake by Orly Taitz herself at this point) blows my mind.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:48 am
As promised, time for d2i. What follows is a chronologically-ordered sequence of posts from a birther doofus named d2i, who became comically paranoid about whether I and several other posters are actually paid by the Obama campaign. I posted them all together on the thread where they appeared (“Birther Movement Dogs Republicans”) and I re-post them, together with my original responses. I have added nothing new to the posts themselves.
I present them here just to let new birthers know that if they want to compete, they will have to step up the game. Far better whack jobs have already stepped up to the plate and whiffed.
1.
“stephen this is my last comment tonight. you are a loser. spending 10 hours straight on one board would classify you as obsessive compulsive. not saying you are but by george all of the tell tale signs are right there waving like a big red flag.
you apparently are off your meds. so i suggest you call it a night and consider you had a good day b/c you made a ton of mullah with all of those souls who believed you to be real and genuine. you are not. you and i both know it. you are a paid 0 blogger.
give it up. you lost tonight. no one gives a rip what you think or what your opinions are. call it a night. go out and grab a drink and enjoy life with humans. really. you deserve it. you faked out so many innocent seekers for the truth so therefore go celebrate. you deserve it.
btw, you lost this round. and you will lose the next round and the next and the next b/c the truth is the truth and it will prevail. give it up. find a job that you can apply your skills too that won't make you look so small. you certainly deserve better than the $11 or $14 an hour you're being paid with taxpayer stimulus funds. get a life. find a partner and live happily ever after. you deserve nothing less.
sleep tight.” — d2i, one day ago
Is it just me, or does he sound drunk?
He tells me I “made a ton of mullah” (now there's an ironic slip, a guy who thinks the Prez is Muslim doesn't know how to spell “moo-lah” and instead uses a word for a muslim cleric. nice!) being a paid Obama blogger by getting people to respond, thus I got paid per response. But he also thinks I'm being paid by the hour with stimulus funds. Double-counting the Chicago way, baby!
Then, in the next paragraph, he starts by telling me to “give it up” because I “lost tonight” but ends by telling me I should “go celebrate” because I “deserve it.” What are we celebrating again?
But that paragraph also has him go from telling me that “no one gives a rip what you think or what your opinions are” to telling me to “go out and enjoy life with humans.” But who would have me as company?
And then in the very next line, he tells me, as an aside, “btw, you lost this round.” I know, you just told me, don't you remember? And since I lost, what am I celebrating again?
The most telling accusation is when he said “you apparently are off your meds.” Several people have commented on this board about how curious the phenomenon is by which people often reveal themselves through their accusations of others.
To me, d2i was either:
1 – sitting there boiling with rage and trying to tell me that I lost even though he really doesn't think I did, so he feels the need to keep saying it as though he's justifying it to himself but he forgets that he already offered grudging congratulations; OR
2 – sitting there off his meds. Or on his something. Because from what he wrote, all I can say is, “that boy ain't right.”
And we didn't even discuss his paranoia about how I'm supposedly a paid Obama blogger…I just accepted it for the sake of argument.
Geez. He was fun. I miss d2i. But I think this last post made his head overheat and some of the circuitry melted together.
I re-post this to illustrate the psyche of some of the more extreme variants of…
Who am I kidding? I re-post this to show you what a tool d2i is.
2.
“kwiley and JT – I go out for dinner and come back to check on y'all and here you are debating this nimpcompoop or knucklehead, stephenperry. Do not let him play you. Everytime you respond he makes money. This ass hat hasn't a clue and will only speak from the negative and dismissive voice. You will NEVER GET HIM TO AGREE WITH YOU! Stop helping him make $$$$$$$!!!!!” –d2i, one day ago
Ok people I was wrong. “Drunk” was the wrong word. I should have used “hysterical.” He really seemed to take a personal interest in the nickels I might be making by getting them to respond. In multiple posts he pleaded and pleaded with people.
And yes, he's right about one thing. I didn't agree with anything they said. Gee, this was fun.
3.
“stephen – you are an idiot. 0 is not eligible. live with it. you lost. you are a total f – ing loser. baaahhhh
that felt good! :-)” — d2i, one day ago
See what I meant about him sitting there boiling with rage? I bet he was really good company at dinner last night! “baaahhh!”
4.
“Add Florida Christian to the list of paid bloggers. Geez, 0's team is really afraid aren't they. To have four maybe five paid bloggers attacking posters all day and now four on the night shift.
wayoutwest, jilly82, intelligiant08 and Florida Christian are ALL paid bloggers! If you respond to their ugliness they get paid. Please do not respond to them under any circumstance. Isolate them and shut them down.” — d2i, one day ago
Can you imagine the scenario by which the highly popular new President would need to have FOUR paid bloggers in this obscure liberal newspaper 3.5 years prior to re-election — and all about an issue that no one is going to change votes over? If you are a birther, you aren't voting Obama. And if you're not a birther, you won't become a birther.
There's not any evidence that would convince anyone; the conspiracy theorist plays upon the perceived ABSENCE of some supposedly critical information as a means of keeping the conspiracy theory going.
And, of course, just because your name wasn't on the list, don't despair. D2i probably fears you, too.
5.
“Night shift trolls are – wayoutwest, jilly82 and intelligiant08, Florida Christian and stephenperry. shifts may overlap so stephenperry and jjfritz may remain on site for awhile.
DO NOT RESPOND TO THEM. THEY ARE PAID BLOGGERS. THEIR SOLE PURPOSE IS TO DISRUPT AND DISMISS ALL DISCUSSION ABOUT 0BAMA'S INELIGIBILITY. THEY GET PAID FOR EVERY RESPONSE.
I REPEAT. DO NOT RESPOND TO THEM. I KNOW YOU REALLY WANT TO BUT DON'T LET THEM PUSH YOUR BUTTONS.” – d2i, one day ago
See, there was a reason I said I got under his skin. Apparently we pushed his buttons! “I REPEAT,” apparently we pushed his buttons!
And new names made the list!
6.
“0bama paid bloggers stephenperry, jjfitz, xscott, joe_heathen and kennethetucker were directed to invade this site b/c of the birth certificate story. For over a year now, these 0bama paid bloggers have invaded and dominated every site that dares to post a story about 0's eligibility. Their standard modus operandi is to stay at the front of the postings and attack the new posters character, demean and dismiss their content and use derogatory language when the new poster defends their post.
They get paid for every response which means stephenperry is making a ton of cash today. If you don't respond THEY DON'T GET PAID. :-)
Hey stephen you are a real piece of work. You are a liar and you haven't a clue what you are talking about. Dumbass doesn't come close to describing your shallow intellect.” –d2i, one day ago
Can you tell how much fun I had reading this for the first time?
Can we say “paranoia?” What'd I tell you about how any new facts get assimilated into the conspiracy theory? Now he has an explanation for every single person who posts an anti-birther argument: we're all paid bloggers who have been at this for a year, devoting our lives to issuing profane smackdowns in hopes of keeping the birther story from coming to light.
This is neat, because it also allows them to explain why the story hasn't taken off. No one has been able to comment; we've stifled all chance that the story might see the light of day.
See, being a conspiracy theorist is the world's easiest job. If you succeed, it's because of your talent. If you fail, it's because of the conspiracy against you.
And I see some new faces out there!
7.
“kwiley – do not respond to the trolls. they slander and challenge all new posters. if they get a response they get paid. please do not respond to them. jilly82 and intelligiant08 are replacing the day shift featuring stephenperry, jjfritz, and kennethetucker.” –d2i, one day ago
What does this guy have, an org chart or something? Does he watch us clock in and out?
8.
“Don't respond kwiley – stephen is a troll and is being paid by 0bama to demean you and call you a liar so as to provoke a response. he gets paid for every response. please, please, please don't respond!” — d2i, one day ago
Can you see why I said “hysterical?” I mean, really, “Please, please, please, don't respond!”
Whatever I did to that boy, I wish I could bottle it and sell it.
Okay, that's the last one I'll show you unless there's a rousing call of Encore! I certainly haven't shown you all of his desperate pleas that no one respond to me and my merry band of liberal crimefighting shape-shifting superheroes.
Goodnight folks, it's been a blast!”
______________________________
Ok, got all that? I encourage any birther who wants to argue that his debating opponents are paid by the Obama campaign to read this carefully so as not to come in here with anything that isn't up to snuff.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:07 am
I see more it just more SPIN from you and Alinsky's Rule #12.
You tried to post nonsense links hoping I would not bother checking. But I did and nailed you on them. The very idea of simply doing a search like “is the birther movement about racism” and what ever turns up would prove your point, was ignorant.
But here is the nail in the coffin for you. At the start of this thread: You actually came to the defense of a person who was playing the race-card with the following:
–”we KNOW it's all actually just about a black man occupying the white house. take a DEEP breath (after)'birther', you've got 3.5 – 7.5 MORE YEARS of 'dealing' with that black man in the white house.”–
You have shown you not only will make implications/accusations of false racism – you will back people who do. As such, you are worse than a racist, because you do use race to underhandedly try to discredit people as a way to win an argument. How sadly pathetic.
It is people like you that make what racism does exist (and it does) even worse. Progress in reducing racism will never be made when people like you go around falsely crying Wolf, Wolf, Wolf.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:09 am
Anthony,
You are simply mistaken. I and everyone on this board can post all the rebuttal in the world, but unless you figrure things out for yourself, what someone
else says is not going to convince you if you won't open your mind to facts. “Factcheck.org” is run by Clinton people, and it is unreliable. It, too, has had
to retract a number of “facts”. Look at your own birth cetificate. Does it list your father's “RACE” as “AMERICAN”…if your father is an American?
Obama's COLB lists his father's “RACE” as “AFRICAN”. Africa is a CONTINENT, and it doesn't even qualify as a designator for country of origin. It is
comprised of many “countries” and many “races”. The forger couldn't even bring himself to put “NEGRO” or “MIXED NEGRO CAUCASIAN” as it would
have been listed in 1961. Do some original research using legitimate sources, original sources if possible, and you will be surprised at what you discover.
==================
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:20 am
Oh I couldn't resist showing you what randypuppy thinks President Obama should do: put his original long-form paper birth certificate on public display in the Capitol Rotunda, guarded and under protective safety glass.
Seriously! This is from yesterday, on the “Surprise! Orly Taitz Still Lying…” thread
“They are BOTH COLBs. Only one is original and in the files and the other was spit out by some computer. One has the doctor and hospital mentioned on it and the other doesn't. If the original is in the files, then a photocopy can be made of it and released or better yet, the state of Hawaii can take it to Washington and put it on display in the Capitol rotunda for public viewing under a guarded safety glass case. Oh, and I think the Hawaiians are lying to cover for Obama. I think the Kenyans have purged their files. The whole paper trail has been erased and scrubbed as much as possible for about a year now. Soon, there will be nothing left to see even if Obama agreed to release anything. And the media just goes along with it all as if it were nothing and attacks anyone who says it IS SOMETHING.” –randypuppy, 1 day ago
________________
“Oh, and I think the Hawaiians are lying to cover for Obama. I think the Kenyans have purged their files.”
And I think you are the product of a remorseful monkey and a very happy codfish.
Let's see your birth certificate. Not your certification of live birth. I will display it in the Capitol rotunda for public viewing.
After all, we're very very proud of you, randypuppy! None of the previous monkeyfish survived long enough to post dumbfuck birther comments.
Like this one:
“or better yet, the state of Hawaii can take it to Washington and put it on display in the Capitol rotunda for public viewing under a guarded safety glass case”
What the fuck? Look, randypuppy, I know you are a racist prick who slings monkey-oriented insults at people. But the President is not a monkey, nor is he a curiosity to be on display for public inspection by those who just cannot accept that he could be for really and truly an honest-to-goodness American.
He does not have to jump when you tell him to. He does not have to show you his papers.
You cannot imagine how grotesque normal people would feel at the notion that the President's birth certificate should be on guarded display in Washington, not to honor him as a measure of prideful reverence, like Washington, Lincoln, or Jefferson…
but to show the UNCONVINCED racist jerks out there that, “gosh darnit, I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen for myself, but the nigger was really born here!”
You seriously posited the notion that the President's ORIGINAL birth certificate (you couldn't bring yourself to settle for a mere copy) should be forcibly taken from Hawai'i and put on guarded public display under protective safety glass.
That can only mean you imagine a horde of unconvinced citizens coming up to get their grubby hands on it to see for themselves. You think there need to be guards there.
What's the difference between making a traveling slave show you his papers and forcing the President to keep his birth certificate on permanent display? This is not a mocking question, I really want an answer from someone. That's what it really looks like to me.
See, Randwulf, THIS kind of bullshit, along with your putrid racist insults, is what I mock you for.
I know you're stupid. I know you cannot write competently. Neither of those things would matter to me in the slightest if you didn't couple your stupidity and functional illiteracy to the Racist Conspiracy Theory train.
But you did.
I'm an American, and you're trashing America. You're also trashing our most prominent American. You're doing this without a shred of evidence. Just speculation and naked racism.
So you should stop whining about name-calling. You bring that on yourself, and you started the name-calling before I ever even posted here.”–stephenperry, 1 day ago
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:26 am
oh stephenperry…..you rock!
Keep kicking butt with facts..not rumors nor opinions…as neither are facts.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:30 am
Is Orally a real American? I can't understand a word she says….maybe she needs to go back to Russia and find a real job..so far she isn't doing anything worthwhile here.
Let's all put our futures in the hands of a dentist/online atty/realtor…maybe she needs to pick ONE job she's good at..because she isn't there yet.
All hail Orally!!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:43 am
Thanks, pitbull with lipstick part deux. I wish Sarah Palin hadn't ruined “hockey Mom.” I have a friend who is a HUGE hockey fan and he turned me on to the sport. I can barely skate, but I do like to watch it. I didn't understand the rules very well, and, growing up in New Mexico, I didn't see it on television.
But it's a great game.
Speaking of great games, poking the birthers with their own words is amusing and satisfying, in addition to being effective. But I actually do post with law and factual citations to objective or right-wing evidence. Nothing like the words of the Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico, and World Net Daily ALL saying the birther thing is bogus and the COLB is authentic.
Yes, even World Net Daily! On August 23, 2008, almost a year ago…. I've cited them throughout this thread, but let me know if you want to see any.
Welcome to the thread and I hope you enjoy your time here. I certainly do.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:51 am
I just have one question. Do we know that the Austrailian BC did not show up AFTER the Kenyan one did? Have to admit, what are the chances this person just happened to find this BC on a geneology site that matched exactly? I think this may be a case of the chicken and the egg which came first? This could have been created FROM the Kenyan BC and then flipped around and presented that the Kenyan one was actually created from it. If you are a birther or not, if you have any logic at all, you have to admit that is a good point.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:53 am
Well, she'll probably get disbarred sometime in the near future. Apparently the complaints that she's been getting about what she considers the practice of law (ignoring statutes and precedent, refusing to follow basic rules of civil procedure, and submitting to a court evidence that she knows to be fake) are starting to add up.
That should give her plenty of time to destroy people's teeth and then sell them houses in bad neighborhoods.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:56 am
PontiusPilate, why do you post obvious nonsense?
Let's just take one example. THIS WEBSITE, WHERE WE ARE POSTING, CORRECTS YOUR POINTS! Here's one — the notion that you could be “born on Mars” and get a Hawai'ian COLB:
“It’s crazy,” said Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health. “I don’t think anything is ever going to satisfy them.”
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.””
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-…
I notice that Anthony, infra, has picked up the main thrust of the argument. I doubt that I need to correct every single error you've continued to post again and again. Anyone who still cannot tell which of us is telling the truth can read the thread or just read the National Review Online:
“
The fundamental fiction is that Obama has refused to release his “real” birth certificate. This is untrue. The document that Obama has made available is the document that Hawaiian authorities issue when they are asked for a birth certificate. There is no secondary document cloaked in darkness, only the state records that are used to generate birth certificates when they are requested.
If one applies for a United States passport, the passport office will demand a birth certificate. It defines this as an official document bearing “your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records.” The Hawaiian birth certificate President Obama has produced—the document is formally known as a “certificate of live birth”—bears that information. It has been inspected by reporters, and several state officials have confirmed that the information in permanent state records is identical to that on the president’s birth certificate—which is precisely what one expects, of course, since the state records are used to generate those documents when they are requested. In other words, what President Obama has produced is the “real” birth certificate of myth and lore.”
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTRjMTFhMz…
The NRO editorial, like the Wall Street Journal editorial from last weekend, thoroughly and completely destroys the birther arguments.
Do you have ANY proof that the COLB is fake? Didn't think so. I look forward to reading more unsupported bullshit from you, PontiusPilate.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:06 am
Factcheck is NOT run by Clinton people. You're a total jackass for lying to people. All I do is mock idiots. I don't insult reasonable people's intelligence.
Factcheck.org is run by the Annenberg Foundation. Walter Annenberg was an insanely wealthy RIGHT-WING political heavyweight. He was Ronald Reagan's close personal friend, and he served Reagan's Adminstration as Ambassador to Britain.
Annenberg gave my university $110 million while I was attending. I remember him landing on campus in his helicopter. I was hoping he'd throw dollar bills to the peasants like me.
He controlled the Annenberg Foundation until his death in 2002. NOTE, this is AFTER Barack Obama and William Ayers were seated on the Foundation's Board of Directors, along with other notable Chicago politicians on both sides of the aisle.
NO Clinton connection whatsoever. More to the point, Annenberg, a right wing patriotic American who loyally served a right-wing deity as Ambassador to the only country that is more white than America….
WAS NOT A COMMUNIST. Nor was he a terrorist sympathizer. Nor was he a fringe wacko. He's old money establishment GOP. And he was thrilled to have Obama and Ayers on his Foundation Board of Directors.
He died in 2002. So don't you think he'd have kicked Obama and Ayers off the Board if he thought they were terrorists or otherwise un-American?
Never mind. You're still pulling shit out of your ass about the Clintons.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:09 am
“Let the courts decide which arguments made by any party are
legitimate.”
What are we up to now, 40 birther suits that have each been dismissed now? Do we need to go for a nice round 50 before you shut the fuck up about nonsense like “let the courts decide?”
Newsflash, PontiusPilate. THEY DID.
And you call ME “incoherent?” Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. At least I don't post LIES.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:12 am
From what I could tell by the other article on this website, the guy whose document got ripped off posted his online a few years ago. What you're thinking of could have happened, but even if I was to give the birfers the benefit of the doubt, that would take a LOT of planning on someone's part to pull that off. Plus, the reward for doing so wouldn't really be worth the effort.
I think the guy behind this is some entrepreneur that looked at Orly Taitz, saw the word “duh” written across her forehead in big red letters, and thought to himself “What the hell? Her crazy ass will probably fall for it. Might as well give it a shot.” He probably had no idea that it would actually work.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:18 am
Roger, I agree with you that in theory, it is mathematically possible that the Aussie birth certificate showed up after the Kenyan one.
But the facts don't seem bear that out. Mr. Bomford's certificate has been online since 2007 or even before that, from what nbc1 and other reliable sources commenting on this site have written. I don't know for sure and haven't researched that.
The reason I have not done so is that figuring out which came first is irrelevant. The Kenyan document has SO MANY errors on its face that it is an absurd joke. You have seen the list of flaws so I won't repeat all of them.
But Mombassa wasn't part of Kenya then, it was part of Zanzibar. Why would his mother go to a hospital 1,000 miles from his father's village? Why would the Kenyan government issue a birth certificate for a kid born in Zanzibar?
Also, why would the document call the country a “republic” when at that time, it was undoubtedly a British “dominion?”
Why use shillings and pence (upper left corner) when Kenya uses CENTS?
Why would there be no signatures where “registrar” and “informant” are each requested to give one?
Who ever heard of a Kenyan man named Joshua Simon Oduya? Was Rutherford Winston Mutombo on vacation?
Et cetera.
So it's an interesting logical puzzle, but really a side-issue. I'm more interested in finding out who forged it, and why. It would be interesting to find out that someone sympathetic to the birther cause sent it to Orly, knowing it would discredit her and thus get her off of the network news. She's killing the conservative movement!
“Conservatives see that hazard.
The conservative talk show host Michael Medved recently referred to the movement's leaders as “crazy, nutburger, demagogue, money-hungry, exploitative, irresponsible, filthy conservative imposters” who are “the worst enemy of the conservative movement.”
“It makes us look weird. It makes us look crazy. It makes us look demented. It makes us look sick, troubled, and not suitable for civilized company,” he mourned.
One of the lead anti-Obama lawyers, Orly Taitz, a California dentist with a degree from an online law school, promptly threatened to sue Medved for defamation.”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19450…
Anyway, happy reading. See you around the thread, roger.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:20 am
Damn, I wish I had seen your post first. Good going.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:22 am
Let's not forget that she told Stephen Colbert that she is a black belt, as well.
I just cannot see her hands moving in blurry-fast motion as she goes through the “forms” for the black belt. Allah knows her MIND doesn't move that fast.
Oops, I meant “Jesus.” Whew, that was close.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:40 am
Of course they look similar stupid,Africa and Australia belong to the CROWN.(Britain)
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:57 am
Well, that's certainly going to be upsetting news for the “country” of Africa to hear.
Sarah Palin, I would have expected you to have a cool avatar of you shooting a wolf from a helicopter or something like that. Don't you have enough time on your hands to make one?
Oh, my bad. Forgot how busy you are with Twitter. Carry on. Don't quit!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:04 am
“What does not make sense is why Obama has refused to release his Certificate of Live Birth. Unless there is something on the records that are personally embarrassing. Still he could block-out that embarrassing aspect, then release hi-res images.”
Why, so you can have something else to cry “conspiracy” about? If something were “blacked out,” y’all would be saying that whatever piece of information was not visible is the ‘missing link’ that would blow his deception wide open.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:16 am
You’ve got to be kidding me. You seriously think an individual could RUN, much less be elected, if he had such a skeleton in his closet? The media/public rode Palin so hard just because she used unalocated funds on clothing – this birth certificate thing would’ve been all over the damned place within minutes of him being a serious contender. But I suppose that’s part of the conspiracy, too.
The words “delusional” and “paranoid” are coming to mind.
Incidentally, I’m not coming down on one side or the other…I just have a serious issue with such ludicrous arguments.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:21 am
Factcheck.org has very little to do with the late Annenbergs — fine folks — other than the grant that established the organization. Some of the offshoots are
a bit suspect, but if you like Obama and William Ayers, that's your business. I may have the wrong leftists in mind associated with Factcheck…some of
their writers and “fact checkers”…and I may be thinking of another front organization run by Clinton operatives. If I am wrong, I apologize for besmerching
the fine reputation of Factcheck.org. Nevertheless, they still get some “facts” wrong, and if they still approve the Obama COLB after all we now know
about it, they blew it. Nobody is perfect. “Reverend Wright” fooled Obama for 20 years into NOT recognizing him as a racist, America-hating Black
Liberation psychopath, so why are you surprised Obama fooled the Annenbergs…like he is fooling you and all the rest of his drones?
==========================
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:47 am
“Communists have been working to undermine this country since the Bolshevic Revolution”
I’m sorry…what?
It’s my understanding that Lenin and his ilk were intent on undermining (and stomping all over any remnants of) Czarist Russia in the years since the Bolshevik (yes, with a ‘k’) Revolution. Communism was just a(n) (un)happy by-product.
Apologies for the multiple ()’s.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:24 am
The COLB is not primary evidence. It is secondary evidence, just like the newspaper announcements. Obama has stated in writing and in public that he was born in a specific hospital in Hawaii. That is left off the COLB. That informaton is only found on the original birth certificate that Obama claims is lost, the vault records that the State of Hawaii has announced they are holding, or the hospital records. Obama could sign a release and a copy of the vault records could be produced, or the hospital records could be released. To date Obama has refused to release any of these records. The primary evidence would either confirm Obama's statement that he was born in a hospital in Hawaii or not. The COLB is not sufficient evidence to prove he meets the natural born standard. The bottom line is that Obama was never fully vetted. We all know the State of Hawaii has the records. There are provisions under Hawaii law that would allow for a photostatic copy of the vault records if Obama signs a release. So far Obama has refused to have the vault records released or the hospital records released. So at this juncture we have an incomplete vetting process and we have a growing number of people that understand Obama is stonewalling on the relevant birth records.
So there are those that say we should accept Obama at his word that he was born in Hawaii and rely on secondary evidence to prove the highest birth standard in the land reserved for the President of the United States, or we can ask that Obama be transparent and produce the records that the State of Hawaii has announced they are holding.
If the vault records do not confirm that Obama was born in the hospital where he claims, that will require further vetting or proof of where he was born. No conspiracy, just the recognition that Obama has not produced the relevant evidence to prove or disprove his birth place.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:40 am
Time to spring the trap…I've run out of time for playing “rope a dope” and sending the kiddies on “snipe hunts” and “wild goose chases.” Much of what I posted is accurate, but clearly some of it was pure “cheese on the cracker,” and it netted several “rodents”…no names necessary, those of you with red faces should be obvious. You may keep the “snipes” and “geese” you caught.
For those of you who still have integrity and love your country and want to see it preserved and not “Changed” into a totalitarian tyranny with no “Hope” of ever restoring it to its former greatness, keep up the fight…but don't get sucked into the “birther” vortex. Obama may or may not have been born in Hawaii, and he may or may not be legally eligible to be POTUS, but nothing short of an armed insurrection and total chaos will result if he is removed from office now on the basis of his “place of birth”. The time to have vetted him properly has long passed. The Marxists have inserted their man, home grown or usurper. Your job is to defeat his destructive policies, and some day, if he truly cares for this country, he just might even see the light himself and realize that he, too, has been a victim of Marxist lies and bigotry from those he associated with instead of being a great leader who took advantage of the opportunities he was given on a silver platter. What a wasted life and wasted opportunities he will have to look back on someday. He will be lucky to have Jimmy Carter's numbers by the end of his first, and hopefully only, term of office. He had a once in a century opportunity to do good for the country and himself…and he chose to do evil instead….pity.
The real front in this war of ideas and ideologies is at the ballot box and at the local level, starting within each family, then each neighborhood, then precinct, county, district, state, and all the way to Washington, D.C. and beyond if the United Nations or any other foreign body tries to deny us our sovereignty. Saddle up, and move out.
….and for “stephenperry”, thanks for being a good sport. As a gesture of my good will, for every spelling and grammur error you find, you win one pound of government cheese pluse (<—note the “e” on the end) a voucher to trade in your '91 Volvo under the “Cash for Clunkers” program…hint, there is at least one of each in this sentence.
Click “HERE” to redeem your prizes.
Oh, sorry, my real name? U. Ben Hadd
…heel, Phydeaux.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:52 am
Just a side story:
“Security Breach May Lead To Obama Natural Born Status
A series of 2008 security breaches at the US State Department may indicate that someone knows Barack Obama’s true status as a natural born citizen – and is waiting for the right time to reveal it.
The breaches, which occurred on January 9, February 21 and March 14 of 2008, were done by two “low level” contractors and another in a mid-level position with no management role. Then- State Department spokesman Sean McCormack admitted that officials only became aware of the incidents on the afternoon of March 20.
According to a CNN report of the incident, “a State Department source said passport files contain scanned images of passport applications, birth date and basic biographical information, records of passport renewal, and possibly citizenship information.”
It was shortly after this security breach that Internet rumors that questioned the “natural born” status of Barack Obama began circulating.
An investigation of the incidents revealed that all three major presidential candidates – Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain – had their passport files compromised. In addition to the the contractual employees, the investigation revealed that a State Department employee had also looked at Mrs. Clinton’s file. That individual, a passport office trainee who inadvertently breached Mrs. Clinton’s file during a training session, was “immediately admonished, and it didn’t happen again,” said McCormack.
At the time, McCormick said the breaches seemed to be “impudent curiosity” among the contract workers, who were not connected. Despite a very vocal call for a full investigation of the breaches by all three presidential campaigns, the incident was quickly forgotten.
News of the security breaches prompted a statement from then-Senator Joseph Biden, who had not yet been chosen as Obama’s running mate. Biden, who was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had oversight of the Foreign Service and the passport office.
“I am deeply troubled that State Department contract employees sought access to Sen. Barack Obama’s passport files,” the statement from Biden read. “Firing or disciplining those responsible is an important first step. But we need to understand why these employees had access to this information in the first place, why they sought the information, and why it took over two months for this matter to come to light. I urge the Secretary of State to promptly refer this matter to the State Department Inspector General for investigation.”
The Washington Times reported on March 22 that the two low-level contractors who were fired worked for Stanley Inc., a 3,500-person technology firm based in Arlington that had just won a US $570 million contract to continue providing passport services to the State Department.
Although dismissed as “low-level” employees, The New York Times reports Stanley Inc. prides itself on extensive background checks for its workers. Approximately 53% of its employees have security or top secret security clearances, which means their employees didn’t just “walk in off the street and are now curious about Senator Obama’s files.”
A third contractual employee working for The Analysis Corp. (TAC), a McLean-based information firm that has helped the State Department automate the Terrorist Watchlist over the last several years, was reprimanded. TAC is headed by Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies. Brennan is also a former CIA agent.
“This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at TAC and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,” the company wrote in a press statement at the time.
Newsmax tied the security breach to the Natural Born Citizen issue back in January 2009:
Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.
“They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”
At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.
On March 22, 2008, The Washington Times reported the investigation, lead by Acting Inspector General William E. Todd and the chief IG branch investigator, James B. Burch, a former U.S. Secret Service agent, focused on the mid-level employee of The Analysis Corp. who was not terminated. The employee inadvertently triggered alarms that finally alerted State Department officials after he looked into the passport files of both McCain and Obama.
On April 5, 2008, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Passport Services Ann Barrett resigned from her post after a credit card scheme using US passport date was uncovered by the security probe. State Department Spokesman Tom Casey told The Washington Times that 24-year-old Lieutenant Quarles Harris Jr. told federal authorities he obtained “passport information from a co-conspirator who works for the U.S. Department of State.”
From The Washington Times report:
The investigation began after Metropolitan Police on March 25 pulled over Mr. Harris in Southeast on suspicion that the windows of his vehicle were tinted too darkly.
After searching Mr. Harris and his vehicle, police found marijuana and 21 credit cards that were not issued in his name or the name of a female passenger with him. Police also found eight printouts of State Department passport applications, and four of the names on the applications matched four of the credit cards.
Upon questioning by agents from the U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Postal Service and State Department, Mr. Harris “admitted he obtained the passport information” from a State Department employee, court documents say.
Mr. Harris also said the fraud ring submitted credit-card applications using the names and “identifying information” of the persons listed on the passport applications, and that a postal service employee then would intercept the cards before they were delivered to the appropriate residences.
Then, on April 17, 2008, Lt. Harris was found fatally shot dead slumped over the steering wheel of his car in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast DC. The Washington Times reported that Lt. Harris was a key witness cooperating with the federal probe into the State Department security breach. Lt. Harris’ mother, Cleopatra Harris, told ABC affiliate WJLA-TV that she believed her son’s murder may have been due to his role in the federal investigation.
“Yes I do. I think it had a hell of a lot to do with it,” Mrs. Harris said. “[The story] made my son appear to be a snitch.”
The incident was reminiscent of a breach of Bill Clinton’s passport information during the 1992 presidential campaign, when an FBI investigation was launched after the State Department reported that someone had ripped out pages from his passport file from the late 1960s and ’70s.
The department concluded that a search of Clinton’s passport records was an attempt to influence the presidential election, reportedly by trying to show that Clinton tried to seek citizenship in another country to avoid the draft.
Then-State Department Inspector General Sherman Funk found no evidence the White House ordered department staffers to dig for political dirt in Clinton’s passport files. However, Funk said the White House probably knew it was happening.
http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/07/24/s…
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 7:02 am
I have a South Australian birth certificate, May 30 1959, which is a certified copy of the entry kept in the register, issued Decemeber 5 1986, and it don't look anything like that one:-)
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:24 pm
so, help this poor ‘wretch’ and/or chatbot out here ‘bender’, was it the ‘truth’ thing that hurt more or the ‘bender’ reference? MOST (after)’birthers’ it’s ‘truth’ and science, and, they most often go off on some ‘praying’ to one of their ‘sky gods/baby jesus’ tangents. spare me the ‘sky god’ BS little brain. if you can’t deal with the ‘truth’/science then jibber jabber away if it keeps you occupied, the adults ‘get it’, delusional.
NOW i know who/what you remind me of! ‘Bender’ of Futurama. ALSO an irascible, drunk.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:15 am
Erm, Orly Taitz is currently in Israel. I don't know about you, but that rings some alarms bells for me.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:07 am
PontiusPilate, have you been getting into the horseradish again? Your posts have always been a wild and erroneous ride, but I've never needed a Secret Decoder Ring to understand what the hell you just wrong before this oen.
Can you take another swing at that post, and translate all your Super Secret Splendiferous Code into English, when you've come back down?
Until then, “we're with you AquaBoy! Godspeed!” –Jerry Seinfeld
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:37 am
No, I meant Phydeaux, and you figured it out…faux French. It's clever, isn't it?
==================
Pingback posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:40 am
[...] If you’ve been following the whole nutty birther controversy, you might know that one birther recently claimed to have possession of President Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate. You can see the “evidence” here, but that forgery has been pretty well debunked. [...]
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:23 am
Well, it's getting out in the drive-by media now.
From David Hahn, “Publisher StatePaper.com ” August 5, 2009.
Publisher: Obama Should Produce Original Birth Certificate
At StatePaper.com, we know by making this statement we will be instantly tagged as “racist,” “birther,” or other pejorative terms by those who defend the President of the United States. We often defend the President and the job he is doing and are regularly lambasted for being “too liberal” or an “Obama lover” by some of our most prolific critics.
But, here is the issue:
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of our country. Article II of the Constitution requires the President to be a natural born citizen. Without reciting them here, there appears to be some serious questions raised about whether President Obama was born in the United States or Kenya. We have not checked sources, but there are reports that some witnessed his birth in Kenya.
The President's campaign staff and then his administration have released and placed on the internet a “Certificate of Live Birth.” We do not dispute the validity or correctness of that document as others have tried to do, suggesting the use of computers to alter seals and names. By releasing this document the President agrees that the claims about his status as a natural born citizen is an open, important, public issue.
But, this “Certificate of Live Birth” is simply not the best evidence that the President and his administration could offer to lay to rest any doubt about his status as a natural born citizen.
Barack Obama is a lawyer and a graduate of Harvard Law School. All law students study the body of law we call “Evidence.” One of the core tenets of American law is the “best evidence rule” which requires the production of original, or certified copies, of original document to prove a fact. Abstracts and summaries are not original documents.
The President has offered an abstract (Certificate) of his birth, but not an original birth certificate which would be the best evidence of his birth. We need the best evidence so that it can do what the best evidence is meant to do; dispel the doubts about a fact. We need to see the Birth Certificate. That's the one that is often handwritten and signed by the doctor.
Lawyers and legal thinkers will, obviously, argue the finer points of the “Best Evidence Rule” and its applicability to this matter. But, that misses the point. The notion of “Best Evidence” is solidly-grounded in law. This is an important public matter and it seems now that the President has started down the path of offering some evidence (Certificate of Live Birth), he should offer the “best evidence” (Original Birth Certificate) which is the source document for his birth. The document behind the document which has been released. This is what is needed now in the court of public knowledge.
The fact in question here is the constitutional qualification of the President of the United States to hold office. With a simple nod, the President could offer the American people the best evidence, the source document(s), as he learned about at Harvard, and dispel those who question his birth as a natural born citizen. His failure to provide this best evidence, when it could be so easily done, raises only more questions, which fuels an ugly public debate.
I guess there are some things that not even a journalism school graduate can stomach.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:50 am
So we're not to believe what you post? Is there some code that we'll all know that stephenperry doesn't? I'm confused. For the record, I'm in the “love your country ” group.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:51 pm
the depth of this one’s wit and contribution to the (after)’birther’ ‘argument’ (such as it is[n't]) is the lame ass ‘nic’. if i was as stupid as this non-contributor, i’d want to remain anonymous too. he’ll wind up never getting laid like George Sodini if he get’s that stupid stink sniffed out.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:18 pm
Is this where you're “sending the kiddies on “snipe hunts” and “wild goose chases.”" or are we done with that?
“Clinton tried to seek citizenship in another country to avoid the draft.” I thought this was debunked a long time ago? Many would be surprised at all the politicians that avoided the Vietnam War when they were young. The list is very long. Some may have had a good excuse.
President George H Bush served honorably in WW2. But starting with VP Dan Quayle there was a string of POTUS and VP that were eligible. Can you name the only one person from the list below that served in Vietnam?
Dan Quayle, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Joe Biden. (President Obama was too young)
The answer is Al Gore.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:26 pm
” One of the core tenets of American law is the “best evidence rule”
'evidence', which, a prosecutor, NOT a defendant, would have to produce to 'make a case.'
it's STILL simple Queen Bee loving (after)'birthers', prove it. oh, yes… you just tired to w/that ridiculous Kenyan forgery. not going so well, is it? SUCKS to be you, you betcha! Wink@!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:32 pm
Yep. I'm just providing folks with an opportunity to read Mr. Hahn's editorial. Like the majority of the U.S. population, Mr. Hahn isn't a lawyer. The Kabuki theater rituals of court proceduralism don't cloud his understanding of the facts in this matter. He's just skating by on common sense, like the other millions of honest (as opposed to Obamaphile) citizens of this country.
What he's asking (and can the editorial staff of The New York Times be far behind?) is that your Mombasa Messiah yank out his “birth certificate,” slap it down on the bench in front of a judge, and allow said judge to put it into the hands of a panel of competent, experienced, qualified forensic documents examiners to complete an evaluation that they're prepared to offer in testimony – under oath – as to their considered opinions of that document's “genuineness or non-genuineness” as support for Barry's contention that he should be allowed to continue living in the White House and not in a snug little room somewhere in Marion, Ohio.
Really “SUCKS to be you,” don't it, kenny?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:32 pm
anyone w/half a brain (excuse 99.9% of the (after)'birthers') SHOULD have 'alarm bells' gong off as relates the 'Queen Bee'. I didn't think she could be any more ridiculous UNTIL i caught her 'act' on MSNBC w/Shuster. wow… cuckoo-cuckoo-cuckoo X10. in the 50's she would have been 'sent away' and electro-shocked. THIS (giving raving loons a MSM 'saopbox') is progress (over straight jackets & electro-shcock)…?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:40 pm
the list is MUCH MUCH longer and inglorius (for rethugs anyway) than your excerpt, jim:
http://www.liberalslikechrist.org/about/chicken…
this site (among others) offers more 'clarity' into just who 9 or 10 : 1 actually 'serves' and who jibber jabbers about serving while sending someone elses kids to bleed and die.
hint: the reich-wing talks and the dems volunteer. now, what does that say?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:41 pm
This is a bunch of crap and lies about Mr. Obama because he is black why not be honest about it? Look I can not an many American can believe who is telling the trues because of so many false rumors and the one on Obama is the most radical from he white REd Neck get over and stop the ‘bull shit. If you are going to talk about conspirance you can not lie about anything because your credibility is gone. Renz should not be allowing to post this crap if they want to be believe on thier other isues. Any American with a little smart can be able to see how the Republican are liying about Obama and doing everything they can to stop his Agenda good or bad is very noticible. Every one spreading this issue is sick.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:42 pm
PALIN – PREJEAN – 2012 !!
DRILL us BABY DRILL us !!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:49 pm
'they' (apparently 'us') are coming to take them away ha-ha…
well, 9the other) 'they' (after'birthers' COULD use a good mind scrubbing/reeducation…
and, we do have an idled SAC AF base nearby. and, it WOULD be good for the local economy…
hmmm thinking…thinking…
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 12:56 pm
again, for the very slow, past-eaters in the room, like tuci. if the (after)'birthers' have some real evidence, THEY are welcome to present it in any federal court (well, at least the ones they haven't already been thrown out of for presenting hearsay and jibber jabber AS 'evidence' and, the court(s) will make a ruling. in the meantime the POTUS has other matters to tend to, like running the contry for another 3.5-7.5years so… take a deep breath (after)'birthers' it is, apparently, going to be a very long 3.5-7.5years of 'dealing' with that black man in ('your') white house. i'm fine with it, so no, it doesn't SUCK to be me. you on the other hand, i'm thinking… not so 'happy'
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:04 pm
Thanks, and your point is? Yes or no, was Communism a threat to the USA and to the world during the majority of the 20th Century? Is it a threat today?
I suppose I could have called it “Hope and Change”….that’s Obama’s new term for it.
=====================
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:07 pm
Nothing that has come out of Obama's mouth has been the truth. If he refuses to come up with a real birth certificate, passports, school and college records, and continues to blow a lot of taxpayer money on lawyers to prevent the disclosure of the above documents, then he is ILLEGAL and covering it up. WHY ELSE WOULD HE NOT GIVE THISE RECORDS UP???? He is pushing communism and socialism on our country. Why, under those circumstances are we not impeaching him?? Is it because he has the supreme court, congress and the senate in his pocket, along with the news media? What are they afraid of? If anybody can answer these questions to my satisfaction, or anyone else's, I will shut up. Until then, I will do everything in my power to get him out of office before it's too late to save our country. I suppose someone reading this will “snitch” to Obama's website and tell him what I said. PLEASE DO! Give the information to the brown shirts or the gestapo, if it makes you feel better.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
Aw, kenny. Got that “talking point” in this morning's email push to “left-wing bloggers” out of Messiah Central?
Shit-for-brains kenny, the evidence has to be presented to support the claim of your Marxist Mahdi that he's qualified to sit as POTUS instead of bending over for his cellie somewhere in the dank recesses of Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary.
He's welcome to “present it [his birth certificate] in any federal court” any time.
He's also welcome to plead the Fifth. I'm pretty sure his handlers can get it up on the TelePrompTer for him, aren't you?
Still SUCKING to be you, ain't it, kenny?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:37 pm
Yes congratulate America and Americans for having voted a black or colored man President of the United States as it could well have elected a woman President, though I would have preferred a black woman President, for Cynthia Mckinney would not have been the uncle tom
call boy whore that Obama most certainly is.
What we have here is true tragedy being played out against the very good people who voted for Obama, for the issue is not the birth certificate, the real issue is the fact that Obama has been an absolute failure in dealing with the very crisis of our time. Yes Obama has acted, acted as a complete yes man for Wall Street at the expense of the productive economy and people of the United States. Trillions for Wall Street and more imperialist wars….O-bomb-em
bombing Pakistan, etc…
Now as to Taitz and the birther issue, She is a wrecker and helping Obama, just as Rush and Hannity provide cover for Obama. Also Hannity, Rush and O’Reilly could have brought up the birth issue during the campaign. Remember Hannity, etc never brought up the fact that Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground where agent provocateurs funded by the Foundations to destroy the legitimate peaceful antiwar movement and create division between the races as was seen by Bernhadine Dohrn’s Weather Underground support for Charlie Manson. Of course the Ayers and gang are foundation funded professors… etc.
People need to realize the whole left/right paradigm is mind control. Obama is a right wing fascist, put forth by the media elite to the public as this great saviour etc and all he does is bail out bankrupt parasitical gambling houses called banks, while no credit goes to the productive economy. Obama is left like Mussolini, who came from a left based popular movement that like Obama was funded by finance capital.
Leibniz 09
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:10 pm
the evidence has to be presented to support the claim of your Marxist Mahdi that he's qualified to sit as POTUS instead of bending over for his cellie somewhere in the dank recesses of Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary.
========================================================
Jesus poplocking Christ, you have got to be the stupidest birfer of all! When will you birfers learn about the burden of proof? It's not that hard to comprehend…the burden of proof in any case lies with the plaintiff, not the defendant! If you're gonna be a hateful racist, the least you can the other conservative wingnut birfers could do is stop making up your own laws to replace the ones that you don't like.
You know, the laws that let a black man be president.
A little tip about your writing: using big words doesn't make you sound smart, it makes you sound stupid. I mean, the word “marxist” wouldn't be big for anyone else, but in the mind of a birfer…
And what's with all the prison rape fantasies? You conservatives sure have some sick tastes. In any event, you might want to quit talking about committing acts of violence against the president, unless you want the Secret Service to come pay you a visit.
They wear black, and I know how much you birfers hate that color.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
Is it because he has the supreme court, congress and the senate in his pocket, along with the news media?
=======================================================================
Yes, that is exactly it. A moderately wealthy black man raised by a single mother is paying off the entire federal government, plus every state legislature, plus the entire federal court system, plus every state court system.
He's also paying off the nation-state of Kenya/Zanzibar/Indonesia so that they don't release any of his records that would place him in Indonesia during the travel ban that never existed. You probably thought that all of those were separate countries, but Obama is so powerful that he made them all agree to be one nation; that way, he would only have to write one check every month.
He also paid off John McCain AND Sarah Palin last year, so that they wouldn't mention any of this. This is true even though McCain's wife is a multi-millionaire. Obama gave him billions, because at the time McCain only had millions and it makes perfect sense if you stop and think about it. He also paid off both Bill and Hillary Clinton, as well as the entire western media establishment, because he has the resources and influence to do so. In order to further his nefarious scheme, he's also considering the option of personally bailing out the entire print media industry. After all, you never can have too much positive press.
And just to be on the safe side, he has also paid off every Muslim in the world so that none of them will come forward and reveal the information that he is really one of them.
He is also covering up every trace of evidence that he even got a passport, went to school, or even existed. That's because he really doesn't exist and he never has. Obama is so powerful that his soul has found a way to exist outside of his body. He lives in all of our heads. Obama is so powerful that he can only exist as an idea, as no physical form can contain his powerful essence.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 2:47 pm
steve x, because most of these lovelorn (after)'birther' reich-wingers get 'it' about as much as George Sodini (1X in 29 years according to his blog:
one less reich-wing racist gun nut, and a dozen more innocent victims, George Sodin: “…30 million women rejected me – over an 18 or 25-year period. That is how I see it. Thirty million is my rough guesstimate of how many desirable single women there are. A man needs a woman for confidence. He gets a boost on the job, career, with other men, and everywhere else when he knows inside he has someone to spend the night with and who is also a friend.”
they're ALL pretty much fixated on getting it in the ass, ASSk (int sic) larry (I'm NOT gay, I just LOVE to SUCK cock) Craig.
and, as for 'burden of proof' ? the only time these shriveled up wastes of man space 'get that one' is when THEIR ASS is on the line. Just ask that bloated bag of hate pus, Rush LimpBalls. He, of course, an ACLU hater from wayyy back, RAN screaming into their arms for protection from the state of FL when he was trying to cover his doctor shopping FAT ASS when he was (then) partying hearty on the hillbilly heroin.
then of course, it's not “if he doesn't have anything to hide, why NOT let anyone have access to any/all of his records” it's: “That's PRIVATE and ACLU protect my constitutional rights!”
'soft', hypocritical, and soooo lame. it most certainly DOES SUCK to be 'them', you betcha ! wink!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:00 pm
really tuci 'bending over', prison rape fantasies, 'get it up'…
NURSE, grandpa's off his 'meds'. seems there's an obvious need (as pointed out by Steve X and others) for his male prostitute supplied viagra and cock 'wake up'. ture-ture Haggard wanna be.
obviously, a 'cry for help' that you should save for an airport terminal, train/bus station, tuci. call Larry (I'm NOT Gay ! I just LOVE cock) Craig for 'tap codes'.
of course, the point lost on grandpa tuci is that whole 'burden of proof thing, asked and answered several times already (not counting SS/FBI background checks and security clearances for the Foreign Relations (TS-Top Secret) Committee file access. just turning up th evolumeand screaming a little louder does nothing except get the attention of a few more moderates and independents that perhaps hadn't heard yet that the reich-wing of the rethug party is gone completely bat shit. see ya in 2010 and 2012 — PALIN – PREJEAN 2012 > DRILL us BABY DRILL us !!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:26 pm
Yahoo has reported this fake as well.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090806/tpl-austra…
David Bomford has asked for his document to be taken down. He can't believe the silliness of it all.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:52 pm
That is your evidence that your not a paid Shill for Obama?
You would be laughed out of day-1 of law school!
He who complains first, let the stephenperry. LoL
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 3:53 pm
I think you need to look at the birth certificates of all English colonies at the time, I would guess that many of them look the same.
Likely this is a forgery, but it wouldn't surprise me if the Kenyan birth certificate used the same form as the Australian birth certificate
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:57 pm
You must have some EGO to think this is your personally owned forum and everybody wants to hear from you like they are your biatches.
Time to for a DNS name change for this website to http://www.stephenperryswashingtonblog.com
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:15 pm
–”Here, for your reading pleasure, some exemplary and profoundly mature writings by the esteemed monkeyfucker known to us all as randypuppy…”–
Kettle calls Pot black.
Like you have any room to talk, Mr. Immature Potty mouth ranter himself !!!!! LoL
Your becoming the daily reading joke for us!!! :-D :-D :-D
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:19 pm
Even if one accepts the birthers' ridiculous claims, what difference would it make if
Obama was born in Kenya? As long as his mother was an American citizen at the
time, her son would also be one. It seems to me there are only two ways of becoming
a citizen of the USA, either natural born or naturalized. If the birthers think the key is
to be born on American soil, then presumably they have no problem with the child of
two illegal aliens becoming president, since such children attain that status simply by
being born here–cf. the news stories of Mexican parents being deported and leaving
their children behind.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:21 pm
Did Obama do his own homework assignments and take his own tests?
;)
Did Obama edit the Harvard Law Review all by himself?
;)
Did Obama attend college as Foreign Student or on a Foreign Student Grant?
;)
Oh that is right we don’t know since Obama refuses to release his College records…. :D
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:25 pm
Nice tips – must come from years of your experience working as ACORNer.
How much did you make a day? Couple of packs of Cancer Sticks?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:27 pm
claim shmame. POTUS Obama invites you to 'bring it', evidence that is, we KNOW you ain't bringing nothing else but jibber jabber grandpa so… 'bring it'.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:30 pm
–”F*** you and the horse you rode in on.”–
Getting into Bestiality now, ehh stephenperry?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 4:35 pm
georgegood, nope. to 'qualify' you have to be born in the US, even if McSame was born in the panama Canal zone (it was under US 'occupation' at the time, like most any/all other US military bases, it's generally considered same-same as good old US of A 'terra firma'…like Hawaii, where Obama was born 2 y after statehood was granted. It is a constitutional difference, but, he does 'qualify'. now, as to the (after)'birhters' 'qualifying' as sentient beings…? not so much, if they actually believe any of their own jibber jabber. but, we ALL know NO ONE could be THAT stupid. it's really about race and that black man in the white house regardless of how much they try to cover that trail and protest to the contrary. racist is as racist does, acts, sounds. SUCKS to be them, you betcha ! wink!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:37 pm
I get a good chuckle out of this one for multiple reasons:
–”I didn’t accumulate over 230 points by being juvenile or profane.”
1) His way of compensating for his “Inadequacies.”
2) Mine’s bigger!
3) Any half-decent shill would have far more points than 230!
(Must be to lazy to make 20 alias logins and give himself “Likeys”.) RoFL!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:47 pm
–”That’s a COLB. Prima facie evidence. Ask Hawai’i.”–
Hawaii Confirms Obama Birth Certificate Not Released
————————————-
Contrary to widespread media reports, Hawaii’s health officials have not publicly released President Obama’s original, “long-form” birth certificate, state officials confirm to Newsmax.
Many media reports have insisted the president’s actual birth certificate is available on the Internet for anyone to download. It is not.
————————————-
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_hawaii_birth_papers/2009/08/06/244836.html
EPIC FAILURE for your Disinformation/Propaganda Campaign!!!
My side is hurting from this one!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:00 pm
–The N-word that Jackson used was “nuts.” You should look that one up.–
Okay technically he did not call Obama the n-word, This what he said:
“Barack … he’s talking down to black people … telling [black people] how to behave.” Only Jackson used the plural form of the “n-word,” not “black people,” in the second part of his comment.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/what-else-jesse.html
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:02 pm
agreed (on crown colonies not having different BSs for different pats of the empire but… same [registrar 'signature' tho it wasn't 'signed',last name] 'Lavender', same [district registrar last name] Miller and, SAME book AND page number too…. ??
how MANY billions to one do you think that the odds are on that?
or, going ocam's razor. if it (Obama fake) is actually a photoshopped rev of the the Aussie doc that's posted up on a geneology website where more than one rabid birther may have found his/her way to find 'eveidence' that Obama was born in Kenya?
that's probably closer to 1 : 1
even for the brain dead (after)'birthers' you'd think SOME of the not yet rabid (after)'birther' types would at least start to question the footing for the 'foundation' for their contentions. but nooooo… the little brains are gonna hang in there cuz.. the only 'fact' that matters is that there is a black man in the(ir) white house!
Pingback posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:03 pm
[...] from: The Washington Independent » Is This the Source of the Forged … This entry is filed under http, yahoo. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS [...]
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:14 pm
It doesn't make sense to say that one must be born on some form of US soil
to be a natural born citizen. What if a woman who is 7 months pregnant goes on
a short holiday to Canada and gives birth prematurely. Are you telling me that
this accidental “foreign” birth disqualifies that child from natural born status and
the chance to be POTUS?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:16 pm
“It's so laughable, it's ridiculous.” (which, makes it PERFECT for the (after)'birthers.
i figure that the Brits being pretty pragmatic, explains the crown colonies not having different BCs for different pats of the empire but… the same [registrar 'signature' tho it wasn't 'signed',last name] 'Lavender', the same [district registrar last name] Miller and, SAME book AND page number too…. ??
how MANY billions to one do you think that the odds are on that?
or, going Occam's razor*. if it (Obama fake) is actually a photo-shopped rev of the the Aussie doc that's posted up on a genaology website where more than one rabid birther may have found his/her way to find 'evidence' that Obama was born in Kenya?
*Occam's razor, also Ockham's razor,[1] is the principle that “entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.” It is apocryphally attributed to 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar, William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
those odds, probably closer to 1 : 1 – especially given the Aussie's take:
“it's so laughable it's ridiculous,”
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090806/tpl-austra…
Aussie says: Bomford said he knew nothing about the “birthers'” claims.
He said the fake Kenyan birth certificate contained his personal details and was clearly based on his own South Australian document.
“It's definitely a copy of my certificate. It's so laughable it's ridiculous,” he said.
____________
even for the brain dead (after)'birthers' you'd think SOME of the not yet rabid (after)'birther' types would at least start to question the footing for the 'foundation' for their contentions. but nooooo… the little brains are gonna hang in there cuz.. the only 'fact' that matters is that there is a black man in the(ir) white house!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:23 pm
jibber jabber away ‘constitutionalist’… your ‘clicking sounds’ are most amusing.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:31 pm
Obama has already been sworn in. The electoral votes were certified. It is now your burden to provide positive proof of YOUR assertions as no one of any legal standing has done so to this point.
Obama has provided his birth certificate already. ‘Nuff said.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:34 pm
Well I think her argument is not too bad, but since she is Israeli she may be carrying out a false flag. I.e. Being a straw woman to knock down and then the much more serious and professional Phil Berg case will get confused with her in the minds of the media and the public.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:34 pm
the US Constitution is specific: Section II Para 5
“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constit…
so, no he/she won't be 'natural born', STILL a citizen but, not 'natural born' and, that would exempt him/her from qualifying for President. but, with only 44 over two + centuries, and a current population of 304 million, the odds are, it isn't going to be an issue.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:49 pm
Precisely right. ANY theoretical possibility, no matter how absurd, strikes a birther as MUCH more plausible than the notion that America chose a black President to lead them out of the thornBushes.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 5:56 pm
NO one on the reich-wing (even Glenn 'Herr' Beck and Karl 'Mr False Flag' Rove will acknowledge her 'argument') EXCEPT the rabid (after)'birthers' that are gathering on the fringe, sucking their thumbs, pitching a fit, thumping their bibles, praying to the 'sky god' / baby jesus of their choice, and clutching their guns.
It's even MORE of a 'stretch' to my way of thinking that the Bergophiles have created/encouraged this wack-job Israeli by way of USSR of Moldavi, as a 'straw [wo]man' to obscure the REAL 'case' (DISmissed by SCOTUS for lack of standing, NOV '08) from 'taking root'/finding allies.
facts FOR the 'case' [regardless of whose case it is] are hard to come by; supposition, hearsay, hyperbole, conjecture, and unsubstantiated claims ABOUND because the one fact that the (after)'birthers' 'get is that there is a back man in the[ir] white house.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:05 pm
“WHY ELSE WOULD HE NOT GIVE THISE RECORDS UP????”
take a DEEP breath…. and release. now, another…. and… release. there now, norman, would you like to know ‘why’ he’s NOT giving up these ‘records’?
for the same reason(s) he and Rahm do everything, it’s cold hard political calculation. and, they are ‘calculating’ how to help the reich-wing can permanently disable the rethug party.
like nominating Judge (now Justice) Sonya Sotomayor, standing back, and watching Senator after Senator in states with large and fast-growing Hispanic populations, Cornyn, Kyl, McSame, Vitter FU*K themselves.
these guys ARE good.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:30 pm
Is there a test? I voted for President Reagan in 84. President George HW Bush in 88 and 92. President George W Bush in 00. But I voted for President Obama in 08. I know you’ll deduct points for my vote for President Carter, Ross Perot and John Kerry (that was a tough one, but I didn’t like what President George W Bush was doing)
I know you served in the military and I did not. After 9/11 I got in great shape and tried to enlist but was told I was too old.
I’ve always paid my taxes without complaint because I know I’m paying for the military, infrastructure etc. I’ve been to other Countries and know that we have it better that anyone else.
I never missed voting even in the obscure elections and try to always educate myself on the candidates. I research both side of an argument and use deductive reasoning to reach a logical conclusion that isn’t set in stone. I know the joy of the “up is down and down is up” moment.
I truly believe President Obama meets the requirements and is our President.
Did I pass?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:33 pm
Hey Kenneth. Watch out for Stephen. He isn't staying on the bullet points from the email pushes. TEWS_Pilot sent him on a wild goose chase and he came back with lame ducks. Now Stephen says he isn't wired to operate under the same old politics as usual and keeps posting about Salma Hayek. Last I seen Stephen was on a Mac users forum.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:34 pm
Yes, you can believe the things I post if they are true, and the same goes for posts from every other poster. I sometimes post questionable or outright
bogus claims just to see whether anyone will really take time to investigate, and I don't mean a 30 second Google search, and then reply with an honest
rebuttal. There are a lot of ignorant people posting online. Consider it an attempt to force them to do some critical thinking, if they even know how. I'll bet
they sometimes learn something they didn't know before, and some of them follow up with more research…at least the smart ones do.
When I posted some of the highly charged and questionable “hot button” contentions regarding Obama's birth and that Factcheck.org was operated by
Clinton cronies, I was laughing so hard, I nearly couldn't type — I have a lot of relatives in Illinois, and I am quite familiar with the Annenberg history. Some
of the theories might even be partly true, but in any case they certainly make good “bait” for the Obamesiah devotees whose main purpose for posting
here is to blindly defend Obama even when they are dead wrong and be obnoxious and rudely reject everything that doesn't fit the Obamesiah template
out of hand and insult the poster instead of using it as a “teachable moment”. I can count on “stephenperry” and a few of the other must-not-have-a-day-
job types jumping on them like piranha on red meat. Sometimes the best way to deflate egotists is to “put a little cheese on the cracker” and set it out in
plain view or play “rope a dope” with them and send them on “wild goose chases” or “snipe hunts”…figuratively speaking. They waste a lot of energy and
become angry and frustrated and curse and berate you and accuse you of being an idiot, all the time acting like one themselves until it finally dawns on
them they have been debating “U Ben Hadd”. Comprende?
Glad you are in the “love your country” group. Can you prove it?
=============
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:48 pm
One fact remains … Barry Sotero (aka Barrak Obama) has refused to simply show us all his birth certificate. Wouldn't you like to see his birth certificate? Proof that he is a Natural Born US Citizen? That would shut us all up immediately!
“reich-wing” … are you stuck in the left-right paradigm? You poor thing!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
Not clear to me how the quoted language means that you have to be born physically in the country to be a “natural born citizen.” Isn't it more likely that that means a citizen by birth as opposed to someone who is later naturalized?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:42 am
jim, this is really good.
Except the part where you use the name of a made-up country. I have never heard of “Nigeria.” Judging from the name, it’s full of big-lipped, woolly-headed black people.
Maybe I’m giving the birthers too much credit. Maybe the birthers will be dumb enough to believe there’s a “Nigeria.” They do, of course, think there’s a “Wetbackistan.”
It’s right next to the well-known sovereign territory of Rand McNally. I think Rand McNally gained independence from Webster’s in the War of the World’s Fair.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:50 am
Do you remember how ridiculous Truthers sounded a while ago? That’s how people are looking at Birthers right now
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:02 am
When a long form is produced in the future, you will say that it’s fake one as well.
When a time machine is invented so that people can go back to August 4th, 1961and you can see that Obama is right there coming out from his mother’s womb, you will say that the machine’s operator brought you to the wrong universe and therefore, part of the conspiracy.
Hence, there’s no point of actually presenting more evidence, is there? It’s all right there for you guys to see.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:05 pm
The burden of proof, Steve, is – as always – upon the disputant making the positive assertion.
The positive assertion in this case is – as always – on the part of Barry Soetoro and his partisans (that's you and your Obamaphile buddies, Steve) to wit:
“The individual operating under the current alias of 'Barack Hussein Obama' is a natural born citizen of these United States, and as such was qualified to run for, and is qualified now to occupy, the office of President of these United States, and not spending the rest of his life working in the prison laundry in Leavenworth, Kansas, trying real hard not to get dragged off into a storeroom and gang-raped by the Aryan Nation guys.”
What you'd like to make people think of the “birther” position is that an entirely secondary positive assertion (“Barry is a fucking liar!”) has been voiced, when in fact the “birther” movement consists merely in calling the question:
So if the stinking socialist sonofabitch has a birth certificate proving he was born in this country, WHERE THE FUCK IS IT?
And, of course, the good old:
So what is this lying sack of shit HIDING, anyway?
So the “burden of proof” is right where it's always belonged.
On your Mombasa Messiah and you Obamaphile fucktards. You got that, Steve?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:11 pm
Tsk. You get that from Messiah Central, kenny, or are you now psychically “channeling” your Mombasa Mahdi?
The “poverty pimp” shitwad has been dodging, quashing, or running like the proverbial scalded polecat from subpoenae for more than a year now, and you're inviting people to “bring it,” bubbie?
Considering how little you've obviously got down there between your legs, kenny, ain't it remarkable how tight in the crotch you're getting right now?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:16 pm
Aw, kenny. More “burden of proof” shit? Jeez, I thought they were trying to keep your kind off the “talking points” email push to “left wing bloggers” out of Messiah Central.
You trying to copy that off Steve? Well, he's not doing so good with it either.
Y'see, dickweed, “burden of proof” is always upon the disputant taking the positive side of any argument.
Like: “Barry Soetoro, that lying sack of shit, is despite all appearances really qualified to be POTUS 'cause he was born in Honolulu instead of his native Mombasa.”
To that, the question called is: “Okay, shit-for-brains. Pull out the birth certificate, put it in front of a judge, and let's get a qualified opinion – under oath – as to whether or not that 'birth certificate' is as phoney a everything else about your asshole Messiah.”
Us constitutionalists call the question.
You shit-eating Obamaphiles have the burden of proof.
See how it works, you pimple on a syphilitic whore's twat?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:18 pm
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in…
There it is, Obama's Birth Certificate.
And there is no such thing as a long-form Birth Certificate in Hawaii.
http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualin…
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:22 pm
All of that typing, and all you had to say was “I don't like having a negro president.”
It's a silly racist statement, but it's much easier on your wrist than typing a long-winded rant with several overtly racist statements like yours did.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:24 am
Yes, but at least Truthers had a coherent explanation for what they THINK happened. It’s absurd, but it’s internally consistent and only requires that ONE political party was in on the absurd conspiracy.
Birthers, by contrast, cannot get their story straight. And their various versions of the stories ALL involve BOTH political parties, as well as foreign governments, foreign citizens, American journalists, and maybe a vampire or two.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:27 am
Birtfers really aren’t all that bright…that’s why they take sixty words to say what a non-delusional person would say in six. See, the birfer mind thinks that by using lots of big words and bold type (AND IF NECESSARY, ALL CAPS) to make a point, it can fool the untrained eye (commonly known as “children above the age of three”) into thinking that it actually has something important to say.
The birfer mind, being delusional as it is, is easily frightened by things that wouldn’t bother normal humans. You may know these things by names such as “facts” and “logic.” When birfer minds are confronted with facts and logic, they become terrified and scurry off into the woods to bitch and moan with the other birfers. It’s the same thing that Sarah Palin does when she gets too close to a book that doesn’t have any pictures in it.
Birfers are a strange creature, indeed.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:28 pm
No. That is not a Birth Certificate. Nice try with the perpetual “it's settled” lie though. Do you work for the Barry's administration?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:30 pm
WOW! Check out these images. Who would have thought such things existed or that anyone could have gotten their hands on them? These are actual images of Hawaiian CertIFCATES of Live Birth!! Oh, my god! How did these insignificant little people manage to have these in their own possession? Some may even be photocopied from the originals in Hawaiian records vaults. You know what this means? They have even said in Hawaii that something like this exists there for Obama. Check them out. For those of you who can't quite grasp the difference between a CertIFICATION of Live Birth and a CertiFICATE of Live Birth, click on the links and look at the pretty pictures. Dave Weigel, this means you!
http://passportsusa.com/wp-content/gallery/pass…
Edith Costa
http://www.cfourstrategies.com/colb.jpg
Blank
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
Alan ? 1963
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-content/upl…
Nordyke 1961 (A day after Obama)
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/HawaiinBirt…
anonymous from 1978
http://patriotpost.us/images/broadcasts/humor/i…
Only doctor signed birth certificate yet to surface for Obama but could be a forgery.
Oh, yes, and then there is this “Certification” from “Factcheck”(?)which has not been seen or handled outside of any of the Obama-friendly sources that have posted different versions using scans and digital photos posted on line. This is all Obama has ever offered as proof that he was born on US soil. Notice there is no mention of a hospital or the name of any attending physician. Hawaii has now admitted that an original long form exists or have lied and said there is one when there isn’t. Since it has never been posted or released by Obama, there is no way to know what it might say. But here is what Obama’s people offer.
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
Obama’s version of a CertifiCATION of Live Birth (probably a forgery).
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:38 pm
First, accepting the constitutionalists' contention that calling the question – especially such a question of qualification – of a public servant is not only the right but the duty of the private citizenry.
For the sake of our republic, this alone is a very good thing. Public servants – even high elected officers are public servants, not civil masters. The are not gods. Not even demigods. They are, in fact, something less than citizens, because in their roles as public servants they may lawfully do nothing except that which is specifically prescribed in the Constitution. The citizen may do anything – anything – save that which is specifically proscribed by law. Big difference.
Second, if Barry Soetoro (operating currently under the alias of “Barack Hussein Obama II”) is demonstrated to have lied to the entire nation and in each of the states in which he enrolled himself as a “natural born citizen” in the presidential primaries of the National Socialist (formerly “Democrat”) Party in 2008, the people of this country will know him irrevocably as a duplicitous sonofabitch who cannot be trusted unwatched in the presence of the family dog or hot stoves, the former which he can be counted upon to rape, the latter to steal.
Third, his failure to prove “natural born citizen” status will precipitate a constitutional crisis that could well see him dragged out of the White House in chains to face indictment on literally thousands of criminal counts. This would be extremely good for our republic, demonstrating that the office of the presidency is not a power center for the “salvation” of this country or our people, and we can get back to taking responsibility for ourselves instead of trying to thrust it off on whatever Adolf Hitler clone comes goose-stepping up Pennsylvania Avenue.
Fouth, chopping off that counterfeiting, bankster-feeding, thieving, socialist sonofabitch at the nutsac will be one of the most wonderfully fulfilling achievements of our nation's long and somewhat troubled life.
Think of it as a cleansing moment, and the first step toward a better world for all mankind.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:41 am
“If anybody can answer these questions to my satisfaction, or anyone else’s, I will shut up.”
Obama didn’t do any of the things you accused him of doing.
He posted his COLB online over a year ago.
He isn’t using taxpayer money to defend himself in any lawsuit. Nor is he spending “a lot of money” to get suits tossed at the beginning of litigation on motions to dismiss.
He is not obligated to release any of the records you demand.
He isn’t pushing communism or socialism on us. We have had a progressive tax system for decades. George W. Bush started the bailouts.
The Supreme Court refused to hear a birther case because the birther did not have standing. Same thing happened to McCain’s critics when they sued HIM.
Congress isn’t in his pocket; an incoming President is judged at mid-terms, so he is actually in Congress’s pocket right now — ask the Blue Dogs.
The Senate listens to no one but Senators. Try pushing John Ensign out if you’re a disgruntled Republican. Try getting Ted Kennedy to shut up if you’re a disgruntled Democrat.
The news media chases stories and ratings. They’d like nothing better than to cover a Presidential scandal of unprecedented proportions. Trouble is, there is not one. So they’ve settled for covering the birthers as sideshow freak entertainment.
Ok, I answered your questions. And I’m satisfied with the answers. You said you’d shut up if “anybody can answer these questions to my satisfaction, or anyone else’s.”
So, I guess we won’t be hearing from you again, huh? Pity that you didn’t choose your words more carefully. Of course, how could you have done so? You’re a birther and therefore you’re stupid.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:41 pm
Recently reported:
–”The Kenyan birth document released by California attorney Orly Taitz is probably not authentic, according to WND's investigative operatives in Africa, though officials in Nairobi do not rule out the possibility President Obama may indeed have been born in their country.–”
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:44 am
James, nothing would have made me happier…a few years ago when it could have made a difference.
====================
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:44 pm
Well, just speaking for myself, I must say that I don't like having a LYING NEGRO for president. And if he had been some Irish shit-for-brains socialist running on Obama's silly fucking Marxist platform on the “Democratic” ticket and had red hair and green eyes, with lily white skin and a name like O'Banion, do you really think 95% of the Black population and all the White-guilt libs and other various types of gutter spew retards would have voted for him. He was elected precisely because he is a NEGRO. If that isn't racist, what is it? (Copy that Stephenmonkey! Another original Randwulf “racist” quote for your collection.)
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:48 am
Assumptions assumptions assumptions.
“He was elected precisely because he is a NEGRO”
To make assumptions is to make an ass out of yourself
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:48 pm
it (the letter of the 'law' as laid down by the constitution is what it is. additional interpretation / clarification at the Immigration web site:
http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVAP.jsp?docke…
INA: ACT 308 – NATIONALS BUT NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
Sec. 308. [8 U.S.C. 1408] Unless otherwise provided in section 301 of this title, the following shall be nationals, but not citizens of the United States at birth:
(1) A person born in an outlying possession of the United States on or after the date of formal acquisition of such possession;
(2) A person born outside the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are nationals, but not citizens, of the United States, and have had a residence in the United States, or one of its outlying possessions prior to the birth of such person;
(3) A person of unknown parentage found in an outlying possession of the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty- one years, not to have been born in such outlying possession; and
(4) A person born outside the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a national, but not a citizen, of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than seven years in any continuous period of ten years-
(A) during which the national parent was not outside the United States or its outlying possessions for a continuous period of more than one year, and
(B) at least five years of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.
The proviso of section 301(g) shall apply to the national parent under this paragraph in the same manner as it applies to the citizen parent under that section.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:49 pm
Oily Taint should be deported. The story emerging about her relationship with the KGB as an informant is fascinating. Let's send her home!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:51 am
Bravo. Especially like the part where Obama made them all be one country so he could simplify his bill-paying.
See, efficiency and government. No longer mutually-exclusive. All hail President Obama!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:53 am
Please. Read this.
http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html
Number 1:
The Short Form is the ONLY document available. There’s no such thing as a Long Form in the State of Hawaii. Quoting from the link above.
“the Health Department “does not have a short-form or long-form certificate.”"
Number 2:
There is a notice in the Hawaiian newspaper that says a boy named Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu that day.
Number 3:
The document provided by Obama is official and recognized nationally in the US as a legitimate proof of citizenship! What more do you want? the Long Form Certificate? Please see Number 1.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:53 am
Let us know when the NYT writes the same thing as a dumbfuck who blogs for a college newspaper, test-taker.
Of course, the Times is unlikely to smear egg on its face by fucking up something as simple as the Best Evidence Rule.
Don’t hold your breath. Wouldn’t want you to pass out. It could be weeks before your wife misses you enough to come check on you, miserable wretch that you are.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 8:54 pm
when the World NUT Daily goes against the 'breathlessly offered' PROOF… not so good for the (after)'birthers'. this is tantamount to the 'golden egg' laying Goose disavowing it's own [FOOLs GOLD] 'egg' as a someone elses turd and backing away quickly. tainted they are, fairly.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:00 am
“‘best evidence rule’ which requires the production of original, or certified copies, of original document to prove a fact. Abstracts and summaries are not original documents.”
See, this is why you can’t get your understanding of law from a dumbfuck, test-taker.
A COLB is indeed a certified copy. Your college newspaper blogger doesn’t seem troubled by that niggling detail. Neither do you. In the blogger’s case, I will say it is because he doesn’t know two shits about legal evidentiary standards.
In your case, you’re disingenuous. You skip past everything that exists but is unfavorable to you. Sort of how you persist in making up gibberish about online documents needing verification, as though the State of Hawai’i had not confirmed, MULTIPLE times, that the COLB says the same thing as the original vital records – Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i.
This makes you uninteresting. Stupid is interesting. Disingenuous is merely annoying. But don’t let me stop you. I know this whiny ranting of yours is the only outlet you have for the immense racist frustration you feel at being powerless to stop a black man from running the world in ways your worm-riddled shit-pumping heart cannot abide.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:01 pm
“Since it has never been posted or released by Obama, there is no way to know what it might say.”
and, obviously, this really bugs you. SUCKS to be you, you betcha! wink!
only 3.5-7.5 MORE years to go, (after)'birther'. here's a nice comfortable spot for you to curl up with your bible and guns and 'thumb': http://www.thumbsuckingadults.com/
see ya in 2012!
PALIN – PREJEAN 20012 – DRILL us BABY DRILL us !!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:03 pm
Really helpful, huh?
Like that has squat to do with configing an Apple Airport.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:07 am
Evidence = COLB. Says so right on the document. Prima facie. Means it shifts the burden to the other side to prove that it is false.
Wouldn’t expect you to let a little thing like reality get in the way of your graphic sodomy fantasies, wretch.
Sucks to be a birther who can’t even tell his wife he wants to take it in the ass from a black man, eh, test-taker?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:11 pm
jibber jabber jibber jabber
i FINALLY figured out where i recognized that knuckle draggin' rap from,Early Cuyler.
http://www.thesquidbillies.com/squidbillies_cha…
'The patriarch of the squid clan. Spent 15 years in the joint. Owns three teeth and a hair-trigger temper. Inbred to the point of blacking out. Fun to drink with.”
Earlie Cuyler: What did I tell you about drinking underneath the age, huh?
Rusty: You said if I could afford to bring back enough for you then you don't care what I do. And it's my body and I can kill it however I want to. And America's about freedom.
Earlie Cuyler: Allow me to explain the contamination process. Pine cones go in here, party liquors comes out here and proceed to here.
[points to mouth]
Earlie Cuyler: Fights begin, finger prints are took, days is lost, bail is made, court dates are ignored, cycle is repeated.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:12 am
My favorite part was when I said he didn’t even exist. Birfers make it so easy to mock them that I would do this even if Obama didn’t invent the internet.
Obama is truly an amazing man/idea/sentient cyborg sent from the future. Did I mention that we’re living inside him right now? Because we are.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:12 am
“Y’see, dickweed, ‘burden of proof’ is always upon the disputant taking the positive side of any argument”
Did you learn that at an American Grand Jury meeting?
You know less about law than I know about your mother. And I know that your mother is convinced that the best part of you ran down the crack of her ass and ended up as a brown stain on a filthy mattress in Hoboken, New Jersey, test-taker.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:18 am
I think he was looking over Orly’s shoulder at Starbucks while she was using their free wireless to “earn” her law degree. He doesn’t understand the burden of proof because she didn’t click on the hyperlink that would have taken her to the “Civil Procedure” message board.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:22 am
Yep. So where’s the COLB, stevie?
The image of a thing is not the thing itself.
If that particular document is the only “evidence” upon which you Obamaphile pimples can predicate an argument that your Mombasa Messiah had been born in Honolulu instead of in his native Africa, then by all means see that document – that physical, print-on-paper, signed and sealed legal document – into the hands of a judge who is empowered and duty-bound to pass it along to trained, experienced, and therefore qualified forensic documents examiners to evaluate as to its “genuineness or non-genuineness.”
Burden of proof is where it’s always been. On Barry and the Obamaphiles.
And, stevie, aren’t you doing all the sucking? With the knee-pads and the application for the White House intern program, and your puckering-up practice for the service you long to do your Messiah?
Hey, it’s your hopes and dreams, stevie. Can’t let a little thing like reality get in your way, can you?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:22 am
You boys must not know the test-taker. (so named because of his absurd bullshit in a early post about how well he performed on a non-existent test)
But you hit the nail on the head with the sixty words part. I have written previously about the joy I take in poking that fuckwit and watching him take 50 words to say “ouch.” I’ve also explained to him that misuing big words is a sign of stupidity, whereas correctly using plain language takes intelligence.
None of this, of course, registered with him in the slightest.
Just as Randwulf the monkeyfucker is a racist who is preoccupied with Civil War reenactments and games of “Patriots and Commies” (not kidding as to either), Tuci the test-taker is a racist who is fixated on watching or participating in interracial sodomy behind prison walls.
These two are merely part of the Birther All-Stars. Their colleagues like naturalborn, AristotletheHun, and franknowzad round out the starting five that I usually field when I need dumbfuck birthers to help recruit new Democrats.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:22 pm
'oily taint'… thanks for that, enjoyed much. so, this (dated) modern day Mati Hari was banging the KGB or…?
regardless, i think 'same-o, same-o for and 'end' for her would 'work' for me:
“…a Dutch-Frisian exotic dancer and courtesan who was executed by firing squad for espionage during World War I.[1]” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_Hari
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:26 am
I never tire of being proven right. You, fuckwit, are OBVIOUSLY “just speaking for [yourself.]”
NO one, not even that ridiculous libertarian rotting husk known as test-taker, ever agrees with anything you said.
Even the “woman” to whose aid you tried vainly to come by attempting to chastise Humanity Critic, never ever wrote anything to you. So you can continue to make yourself look foolish. It’s fun for the rest of us.
Just don’t leave your pet monkey too long. He shits in your shoes when you don’t give up that ass on the regular, fuckwit.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:26 am
Oh, I don’t claim to have the truth.
Just a question or two that haven’t been answered.
The truth – awkward and inconvenient though it may be for your Fraudulence-in-Chief – is revealed with the simple act of putting his birth certificate – “long-form” print-out of what the state of Hawaii has “backed up on hard drive” in Honolulu, or the “short-form” COLB supposedly used to create those computer graphic images back in June 2008 – and say:
“Here y’go, your honor. Can I have ‘em back when you’re done with them?”
And that’s the truth, ain’t it?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:29 am
Nah. The story sums up in one line.
The image of the thing is not the thing itself.
The images of that supposed COLB don’t even prove that there ever was such a legal document issued to “Barack Hussein Obama II” in 2007.
To get surety on that, the real document itself has to be put before a judge and thence conveyed to qualified forensics evidence examiners.
Okay. I’m with that.
So why the fuck isn’t Barry?
Hm. “Damn. That’s funny….”
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:29 pm
I guess you don't see the irony in trying to debunk Obama's jpeg image with other jpeg images.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:33 am
What, a private citizen has no right to demand of a public servant – a government employee, a tax consumer – proof of his bona fides regarding qualification to serve in the post to which he has been elected or appointed?
Tsk. Little stevie, before you go on with this “You have no such right” line of shit, try reversing it, and explain how your beloved Mombasa Messiah has any such privilege to ignore a legitimate question of this nature, or immunity from responsibility to account for himself to the people of the nation he serves.
You go right ahead with that. I want to hear it. And then I want you to start ragging on Dubbya again.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:34 am
We would all be much better off if Conservatives got laid as much as liberals and Democrats do. I mean, look at the 90s. I think part of the reason that the country was in such great shape during that time is because Clinton was getting more ass that an twelve-pack of Charmin.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:35 am
Doesn’t matter what you think they are, Rat-boy.
I’m merely calling a question or two. The “facts” are in Barry’s possession, and inasmuch as those “facts” are not a matter of national security (he was born; he claims it happened in Honolulu; of him is being demanded proof positive of his claim), just what the fuck is he HIDING, anyway?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:36 pm
and, i 'don't rule out the possibility that the World NUT Daily researchers in Nairobi are all AIDS infected, monkey-banging delusionals' so… i would take their disavowal with a grain of salt (peter).
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:38 am
Nah. Just persistent. Drives you bugfuck, don’t it?
Again: the image of a thing is not the thing itself.
If the COLB existed in June 2008 to be scanned to make those crappy computer graphic images, where the fuck is it?
Just what the fuck is that sad sack of shit HIDING, anyway?
Hey, great content for a really “edgy” tee-shirt, don’tcha think?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:39 am
Dunno. Ask little stevie. He’s the Mombasa Messiah’s official cocksucker in your team, isn’t he?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:39 pm
Zut alors! At last, something approaching honesty from the primate-prober we know as randypuppy. I present a bit of telling evidence from the “Surprise! Orly Taitz still lying…” thread.
Below, Animal chews on randypuppy's fatty ideas before spitting them out at the end of his post, thusly:
“I wish the birthers would fess up and say what this is about: they hate the thought of a democratic black president and would rather see him fail than do something good for America.” — Animal
randypuppy's first words in reply were:
“Yes, I agree.” — Randwulf the monkeyfucker
What took you so long to admit that you're a racist fuckwit, randypuppy? I mean, we all knew it. But you kept being coy. Sort of the way you were coy about your feelings for King Kong. You pretended to be interested in Naomi Watts. You said that's why you had a chubby during the movie. But your tears when Kong died were cries from a wounded, tender heart. You can't fool us. We know true love when we see it.
But back to you being a racist prick. Glad you finally admitted it. Now I can move on to other business. Until your stupid monkeyfondling ass posts something again.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:42 pm
No no, Steve. Obama's jpegs are suspect. You can trust the other jpegs. If you don't get that you're some kind of libtard.
Only a libtard would need to have proof of something so obvious as the fact that Obama is the socialist reincarnation of Beelzebub, Xerxes, Macho Man Randy Savage, and Sammy Davis Jr. all rolled into one.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:47 pm
Ken, I disagree with you, for once. You can be a natural-born U.S. citizen if you are born on foreign soil. You just need one parent to have been a U.S. citizen for 5 years.
(This is under present law; under the law in existence in 1961, if only one parent of a foreign-born child was a U.S. Citizen, that parent had to have lived in the U.S. for 10 years, including 5 years past the person's 14th birthday. That law, for obvious reasons, was changed.)
I've seen the law posted on these threads. Let me know if you or anyone else need a hand digging up the cite. I have some time on my hands now that randypuppy is off looking for monkeys that don't know enough to raise the general alarm upon catching wind of him.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:48 pm
steve X
these ARE (after)'birthers') we're talking about here…
c'est impossible!
irony (plural ironies)
1. A statement that, when taken in context, may actually mean the opposite of what is written literally; the use of words expressing something other than their literal intention, notably as a form of humor.
2. (colloquial) The quality or state of an event being both coincidental and contradictory in a humorous or poignant and extremely improbable way.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/irony
the definitional restrictions imposed (eg contextual juxtapositon, humor and/or poignancy) 'thins' the (after)'birther' 'herd' w/extreme prejudice, so… no, trying to debunk a jpeg w/a jpeg is 'lost' on the 'little brain' (after)'birthers'. all they know/care about it that there's a black man in the white house.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:49 pm
See, the problem with this set of laws is that it pertains to people whose PARENTS are not citizens. (nationals, but not citizens) Please read it again.
If your parents are in fact citizens, or one of them is (and has been here long enough), you are a natural born citizen.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:50 am
Hmmm.. just want to ask… do you know what I am referring to by “Truthers”?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:50 pm
Please provide evidence of the “little bit” part. I have a friend who wants to tell her parents that she's “a little bit pregnant” and she could apply your argument to her own situation.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:52 pm
left out Baal, sp.
let's NOT exclude the baby eater.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:56 pm
that's INA ACT 308 Immigration law, and I think I posted it below too, but my 'take' was Obama's mom didn't 'qualify' under section: (B) at least five years of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years. because she didn't meet that threshold.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 9:58 pm
See, here's why I'm so pleased that darpot has begun “following” my comments (I got an email alerting me to this fact).
Not only does darpot not understand anything about the birther nonsens, darpot ACTUALLY BELIEVES that jim is being serious.
Not only that, darpot does not recognize the quote as the verbatim words of Sarah Palin, expressed originally in tweets and recited as Beat poetry, to comedic effect, by William Shatner on the Tonight Show.
Talk about birther dumbfucks.
Hey jim, WB. Low blow calling me out for the Salma posting. A man has needs. What do YOU do when you're between paid blogging shifts?
Did you see the d2i and randypuppy recaps? I still crack up reading d2i's hysteria to kwiley about “please please please do not respond to them!”
Speaking of which, anybody seen kwiley lately? I guess “she” must be off with “her” “black” “husband,” because “she” says “she” is “his” “slave.” Pity that he won't allow her back on the internets…
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:02 pm
cue the bongos, and, alert the re-education brownshirts, we've got another one (darpot) for 'processing'.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:03 am
James, you are very late to the party. Citing a “Dear Reader” column in a newspaper is hardly proof one way or the other. Is the writer a recognized
forensic expert on birth certificates? If Hawaii does not issue long form birth certificates, are the scores of Hawaii long form birth certificates examined
during this circus ALL FAKES? Here’s just one.
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/longform.jpg
…and here is a photostat of Susan Nordyke’s actual 1961 long-form Hawaiian birth certificate from the same hospital where Obama reports he was born
dated the day after Obama’s birth — one of TWO hospitals he has claimed, and BOTH deny they have ANY record of his birth at their hospital. This lady’s
mother entered the hospital the day before Obama’s mother aledged did but took longer to deliver:
http://www.wnd.com/images/090728birthcert.gif
As has been pointed out before, all that is required to post a notice of birth in the newspaper in Hawaii is a statement from an adult saying it took place.
Another source is the summary record sent out by the Department of Health, which also contains birth notices that are accepted if an adult simply says
the birth took place.
According to Jerry Fuller and Mike Persons of the passport services division of the U.S. State Department, a document such as the online COLB could be
acceptable to prove U.S. citizenship for the purposes of getting a passport if it contains a certain number of components, such as time and date of birth,
location and name. Robert Klein Engler, who writes at Chronwatch-America.com, said he called the State Department to ask about obtaining a U.S.
passport with only a “Certification of Live Birth.”
“I was told flat out, ‘No!’”
Since you like to read articles at internet links, here is one you might enjoy:
Guess how many ways to get Hawaii ‘birth certificate’
Some required nothing more than assertion from an adult
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105371
As I have pointed out numerous times before, look at your own birth cetificate. Does it list your father’s “RACE” as “AMERICAN”…if your father is an
American? Obama’s COLB lists his father’s “RACE” as “AFRICAN”. Africa is a CONTINENT, and it doesn’t even qualify as a designator for country of
origin. It is comprised of many “countries” and many “races”. The forger couldn’t even bring himself to put “NEGRO” or “MIXED NEGRO CAUCASIAN” as
it would have been listed in 1961. Obama’s mother is listed as “CAUCASIAN”, not “AMERICAN”. Do some original research using legitimate sources,
original sources from experts on the subject if possible, and you will be surprised at what you discover.
If “Dear Leader” would simply unseal ALL his records the way other Presidents have, the truth could be known. Even John McCain’s long form birth
certificate is still posted online today. What is Obama hiding?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:05 am
Nope.
test-taker, you still need to come up with a theory that explains why Hawai’ian Republicans, as well as U.S. mainland Republicans, are lying to cover Obama.
You also need to invent a reason why RIGHT WING journalists from all over the spectrum, from World Net Daily to Wall Street Journal and National Review Online, from Ann Coulter and Bill O’Reilly to Jonathan Martin and Charlie Gibson (to say nothing of independent or left-wing journalists), continue to tell us that the birther conspiracy theory has ZERO basis in fact.
So, back to my post. You dumbasses can’t get your story straight.
I’m glad you keep trying though. It gives everyone a crystal clear look at the idiocy traipsing through the recesses of your cranium. I see you’ve made some new friends. Pity that they cannot stop insulting you or asking you if you even fucking know what is meant by Truther.
LMAO
And you’ve even got other people addressing you as “test-taker” now. I’m so proud. Little ol’ team leader me, having an effect on big ol’ dumbfuck you.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:06 pm
Hawaii Confirms Obama Birth Certificate Not Released
–”Contrary to widespread media reports, Hawaiian health officials have not publicly released President Obama's original, “long-form” birth certificate, state officials confirm to Newsmax.
Many media reports have insisted the president's actual birth certificate is available on the Internet for anyone to download. It is not.”–
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_hawaii…
PS: I am the one who posted the –”The Kenyan birth … … is probably not authentic …”–
(I had to post it as a Guest, because of problems with the login system.)
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
what IS that 'stink'… snif… check your diapers, grandpa and, save that pant/crotch homoeroticism for your (too) young friends, Terd Haggard wannabe.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:10 am
“What, a private citizen has no right to demand of a public servant – a government employee, a tax consumer – proof of his bona fides regarding qualification to serve in the post to which he has been elected or appointed?”
Wow. I never thought you’d understand. By George, I think he’s got it!
I am glad you have expressed your wants. You forgot to say you want the black guy to get bent over in Leavenworth again. Don’t know how you left that out; you must have an Autoformat-as-you-type function in your word processor that puts that in all your posts. Sort of how you type “Mombasa Messiah” by typing “MM.”
“You go right ahead with that. I want to hear it.”
Hmmm. How to put this… test-taker, when I TYPE something to you, you cannot hear what I write. I know that you’re cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. But I refuse to indulge your insanity any more than necessary to mock you.
What does Bush have to do with your idiocy? I’m sure there’s a connection. Just lost the sequitur. Little help?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:14 am
Wow. Doesn’t matter what YOU think, either, test-taker!
That little fact seems to escape you. I used to wonder why you don’t post at some libertarian or right-wing nutjob site. At least there people wouldn’t disagree with you.
And then it hit me. You’re here because you WANT people to disagree with you. Sort of how randypuppy wants people to associate him with Civil War reenactment and fondling monkeys.
You apparently enjoy being told you’re stupid and your ideas are absurd. Sort of like how some men pay prostitutes to stomp on them while wearing stiletto heels.
I don’t claim to understand you, test-taker. I just claim to understand some of your motivation. I still don’t know, for example, precisely how MANY times you were “interfered with” as a boy.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
Your posts are just speculation piled on a heap of bombast. Or is it the other way around. Anyway, please start posting actual facts that make some sense.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:17 am
Your penis envy is showing again, test-taker.
Just because I steadfastly refused to suck YOUR flaccid cock doesn’t mean I’m sucking anyone else’s.
You probably think that the women who don’t find you attractive are lesbians, too.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:21 am
Actually, Steve, when I read your post and got to the end, I thought of The Usual Suspects, at the end where Kevin Spacey says “the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.”
One of my favorite movies. You’re all right, Steve!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:22 pm
Paranoid much? My God you folks are strange. Keep it up. You will eventually make it nigh impossible for a conservative to ever get elected again.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:25 am
I copied almost work for misspelled word from the Nigerian email SCAM.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:25 pm
You are right. Birther claims are never about what is plausible. That would be too hard. They focus on mere possibilities – no matter how far-fetched.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:28 pm
Lol. A birther talking about “common sense”. When your entire argument is built on the basis of supposed conspiracies, lies, suppositions, forged documents and improbabilities of the other side, while you fail to recognize the most plausible explanations for the most inane disputes.
Next: Goebels discusses Human Rights.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:29 pm
Ken, recently on Countdown, I think it was Monday's episode, Keith Olbermann repeatedly and unwittingly referred to Orly as “Orly Taint.” The comedian Keith was talking to had to correct him!
Keith said “what have I been saying?” And then he said “Taitz. Taint. What's the difference?”
No answer from the comedian. I guess he wants to get work from Republican crowds.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:31 am
See, YOU are the one preoccupied with monkeys.
And what is it that you need the monkey to be drunk for, randypuppy? Obviously something that it would never agree to participate in with you if it was sober.
Stop pulling back the curtain on your depraved sex life. Who knew that your game is so weak that you cannot even pull a WILLING monkey?
Oh, wait. We all knew that.
At the risk of repeating myself, God, you’re dumb.
Here’s a quote from you: “Disgusting monkeys!”
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:31 am
*sigh* can u give me a reference that is not from WND please?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:31 pm
“What took you so long to admit that you're a racist fuckwit, randypuppy?”
It's ALL about maintaining the (false) image for most of these reich-wingers that they are 'normal' (eg NOT hate speechifying racists jibber jabberers) you know, for 'appearances' sake. Same 'cloaking tactic' that they employ using religion' / christianity' to cover the FACT they're actually small, hatelful, twisted MFrs from the get-go for the most part and..
occasionally they let down that 'guard' when they think they aren't being 'overheard' by one of us 'paid obamabots'.
i've got a story i'll share in a bit about my local county rethug chairman that will help you appreciate this.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:33 pm
darpot, ordinarily I would just mock your source, newsmax, before posting my favorite quote from the National Review Online.
But since you're special, and apparently differently-abled, I will just use a quote from the very same article you are misconstruing:
“The certification of live birth qualifies an individual to receive a passport, a driver's license, or otherwise establish residency for official purposes, Hawaii says.”
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_hawaii…
Did you notice that part at the end about “establish residency for official purposes, Hawai'i says?”
That means Hawai'i says the COLB establishes Obama's birthplace as Hawai'i.
Let's see you chew your way out of the shithole I just pushed you back down, darpot.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:35 am
“You need to did a deep hole and get into it and stay real quiet.”
You need to “dig” out a dictionary, monkeytoucher.
You can sit in a hole and read it. Just crawl out when you need help with big words. Like, for instance, “dig.”
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:35 pm
Obama has posted his birth certificate. Newsmax gets it wrong as usual. Big surprise.
There is no valid reason that the “Short Form” birth certificate or COLB is not acceptable.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:36 pm
Ah, good catch. I did leave that one out.
As I recall, that one came courtesy of our birther pet, Queen of Comedy Navigator 7.
He of the “blacks owe whites an explanation for their collective failure to launch” fame…
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:39 pm
Oh, randypuppy? Is that another threat? Are you gonna “put steel up his ass” for daring to “cross swords” with you?
See, one difference between you and Ken is that he actually served in the military.
One difference between me and Ken is that I just really enjoy teasing you about beating the shit out of you. Ken wouldn't waste time with words.
I mean this in all sincerity. Be careful who you threaten, when you know nothing about the people you are talking to.
Ok, I've done my humanitarian duty. You may now return to shoving frozen bananas up your ass.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:40 pm
I agree that Obama's mom didn't qualify. She was 18 and thus hadn't lived in the U.S for 5 years past her 14th birthday.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:41 am
The fact that people on this site…back up a bit…BIRTHERS on this site… are fooled by the Nigerian bank scam (I’ve seen responses that indicate people take it seriously!) is friggin’ scary.
What is also friggin’ scary is the thought that you had to read all of the sordid details of my conversations with the wretched test-taker QUITE closely, or else you’d never have seen that Salma Hayek thing.
I would love to be able to deny that I ever communicated with test-taker. I always come away from reading his posts feeling dirty, sticky, and vaguely ashamed. But then I read more of his insipid crap and can’t stop myself from mocking him again.
Let’s keep this between us. I wouldn’t want darpot to find out, for example, that I have other pet birthers besides him.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:42 am
James – I had to look it up. Now I remember.
“Truth movement” is the collective name of loosely affiliated organizations and individuals that question whether the United States government, agencies of the United States or individuals within such agencies were either responsible for or purposefully complicit in the September 11 attacks.”
I agree that the Birthers are looking like the Truthers.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:42 pm
i caught that. and, “what's the difference' is: a 'taint' will go away after a while, taitz…not so much.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:45 pm
“First, accepting the constitutionalists' contention that calling the question – especially such a question of qualification – of a public servant is not only the right but the duty of the private citizenry.”
Nonsense. You have no such right, and you have no law that supports your premise. Which is why you always just take it as a given that you DO have that right.
Accepting Superman's contention that Bush flew planes into the World Trade Center as a way of stopping time, it is the right and duty of any private citizen to steal a B-2 Stealth Bomber and fly it to Krypton for a galactic battle between libertarianism and sanity.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:50 pm
I thought it was that a taint is neither an asshole nor a pussy (It “taint” ass and it “taint” pussy), whereas Orly is both.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:51 am
Wow. I can only assume you’re joking.
You don’t often read “much more serious and professional” followed by the name of a 9/11 Truther.
I guess, relatively speaking, you are correct. But only because birthers are dumber than the people who pay 99 cents to respond to polls via text message, but only indicate they have “no opinion.”
Yikes.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:51 am
Sure, James, and can you do some reasearch yourself? Kinda reminds me of the guy who went to the doctor and was told he had only two weeks to live.
He asked if the doctor minded if he got a second opinion. The doctor said, “Sure, you’re ugly, too.”
Is it the website that bothers or the FACTS? Can you cite some error in what you read there? Obama could shut down the issue in a day if he just unsealed
his records. He has now asked everyone in America to inform on each other about opposition to his “healthcare” proposal. If he expects US to participate in
such an UN-American activity as that, why can’t he at least set an example by unsealing his records and showing US some of that “transparency” he talked
so much about when he was campaigning for our votes? What is he hiding?
================
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 10:52 pm
agreed,born in Hawaii is born in Hawaii. this 308 'fill in' was for clarification for georgegood and johnson. but, darpot, don't let that keep you from going 'scanner' victim on us.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:59 am
Your reply to the Docs allergic peanut reaction and was priceless.
This new wave of birthers are darker and more disturbed.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:02 pm
“Not only does darpot not understand anything about the birther nonsense, darpot ACTUALLY BELIEVES that jim is being serious.”
Stephen I was getting darpot ready for my:
I have proof that President Obama isn't a citizen. He was born in Nigeria. I can send anyone the ORGINAL birth certificate but the transaction requires maxiimum confidence. I'm getting it from a top offical of the federal government of Nigeria. I'm solicating your help because the documents are in the possession of the last military regime. Please note that the transaction is 100% safe.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:03 pm
Don't tell darpot, but word on the street is that Obama is sneaking into the National Archives at night and stealing priceless historical papers.
He puts them on eBay to pay the skyrocketing costs of funding a paid blogger disinformation campaign.
I think that Betsy Ross's sewing needle fetched 8 grand.
The condom that broke on Thomas Jefferson and Sally went for a cool million.
If I'm not mistaken, the axe that George Washington chopped down a cherry tree with was bartered to the Black Panthers in exchange for security at the next Obama town hall meeting.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:07 pm
“WHY ELSE WOULD HE NOT GIVE THISE RECORDS UP????” asks normancutsail
my answer:
take a DEEP breath…. and release. now, another…. and… release. there now, norman, would you like to know 'why' he's NOT giving up these 'records'?
for the same reason(s) he and Rahm do everything, it's cold hard political calculation. and, they are 'calculating' how to help the reich-wing can permanently disable the rethug party.
like nominating Judge (now Justice) Sonya Sotomayor, standing back, and watching Senator after Senator in states with large and fast-growing Hispanic populations, Cornyn, Kyl, McSame, Vitter FU*K themselves.
these guys ARE good. REALLY sucks to be you, you betcha! wink!
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:11 pm
i stand 'corrected'. half-way between slot a or whole b it is.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:20 am
“Not only that, darpot does not recognize the quote as the verbatim words of Sarah Palin, expressed originally in tweets and recited as Beat poetry, to comedic effect, by William Shatner on the Tonight Show.”
Ex Governor Palin also used the quote in her farewell speech. It has to be some coded message to Vladimir Putin or it’s like rock and roll lyrics that you have to be high to understand them. Either way I’m clueless as to what she is talking about.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:23 pm
Stick you own thumb up your own ass and then suck away.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:29 pm
Oh come up with something new will you! Geeeeeez. Don't worry about my military experience. You don't have time to catch up. (Or the balls.) You need to did a deep hole and get into it and stay real quiet. Or think about immigration.
Oh that reminds me. I have a joke for you. What do you call a thousand little pussy lawyer wanna-be types, all chained together and dead on the bottom of the ocean?
Answer: A good start.
And again, here is the only doctor signed birth certificate yet produced for Obama:
http://patriotpost.us/images/broadcasts/humor/i…
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:31 pm
Waiting for what dumbfuck? Why you won't be here in 2012? Because you are TFSTL. (Too Fucking Stupid To Live)
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:32 pm
What an idiot. Don't you have anything better to do? Cause you definitely don't have anything intelligent to say apparently.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:34 pm
what a charmer. now that we have the 'pleasantries' out of the way. how about elaborating, susie. tell me how/why i 'won't make it to 2012'?
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:39 pm
that would be emigration, dipstick. these 'little brain' (after)birthers' are obviously inbreeding and leaving school early in the fly over states, stephen.
JUST the kinda guys you (don't) see taking over the world. this one STILL won't elaborate for me, either. didn't figure him to be the shy type, oh well, must be part of that thumbsucking syndrome.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:43 am
http://www.hambiltonian.com/domain/agk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/naturalbornchart072920091.jpg
Native Born
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:45 pm
FINALLY !! It 'speaks', not very clearly, but that's a start, susie. Come on, be the anonymous 'man' and say what you wanna say, susie. out with it. come on…
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:46 am
Is that the best you can come up with?
Curtsy Sniker Time !
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:46 pm
are you this 'coy' with all your threats? WHAT a pussy.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:51 am
Come on stephenperry you can do better than this. Oh, sorry I meant jimpa. Or is stephenperry-jimpa.
RoFL.
Comment posted August 6, 2009 @ 11:51 pm
anything 'intelligent' would OBVIOUSLY be wasted on a 'little brain' (after)'birther' like you, susie. that's a fact you've demonstrated several times on several 'birther' related forums over the last couple of weeks. so, nope. 'nogots' for you, susie. just mind your manners, and your place and we'll just continue to ignore you ignoring ALL the facts, EXCEPT that black man in the white house which we KNOW is the real 'problem' here for you, susie, now isn't it? it's ok. we know. just say it. come on. sack up jackoff.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:57 am
Barry a negro? Nah. Never. He’s half-white, so that might make him a mulatto, but his father was a big chunk Arab, and only a bitty-bit Luo tribesman.
Sand Nazi counts as white, doesn’t it?
So figure he’s what my father’s generation (and mine) have always called a “quadroon.”
Yeah, I know that’s politically incorrect for some asshole leftist reason, but fuck all you shit-for-brains anyway. Quadroon is a perfectly applicable and non-pejorative term for describing a person sired by a mulatto male upon a white female.
What the hell else would you prefer? “Quarter-black”?
Sounds like a football position on offense.
And that definitely means you, little stevie.
And who says I’d mind having a negro president?
Give me Thomas Sowell in that office instead of that sorry sack of shit, Barry Soetoro, and I’d be happy as a clam.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:02 am
Aw, little stevie. You asked how I’d done on standardized testing, remember? And how come you care what I’d responded? “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog,” right?
What could it matter? Shit, I even believed you when you confided your deep and heartfelt hopes to be accepted into the White House Intern program, so you could go off to Washington City with your knee pads and service – er, serve – your Messiah as the good little cocksucker you truly are.
And you’re supposed to be black, ain’tcha? You think your Mombasa Messiah is kinda black, right? So it wouldn’t be interracial sodomy between you two at all!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:35 am
Eh, I'm not convinced that susiemonkey is an American.
Until I see definitive (not merely an online jpeg) proof in the form of his long form birth certificate, I stand by my working theory.
The simian slurper usurper is really just the offspring of a remorseful monkey and a very happy codfish.
That, or he's frank nowzad's dimbulb cousin from Frankfurt.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:56 am
i'm not convinced either, and because she/susie couldn't be more specific, nutless as 'she' is about how/why i won't make it to 2012 than: 'i'm to stupid to live', i'm not even convinced it's not some 'skirt' acting out. could be canadian, no offense to the other 30Million of ya, eh? but, NOT smart enough to be brit schooled like (not so)Frank. this thumbsucker is some kinda fly over country, shallow end of the gene pool 'product', i'm afraid.
we (collectively speaking as Americans NOT AmeriKans) 'won' this mutant. are those re-education camps finished yet, sp? tag this one for pick up.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:02 am
Latina Justice Sonya Sotomayor is confirmed, 68-31.
Results announced by LIBERAL JEW Al Franken
BLACK MAN IN THE(IR) WHITE HOUSE CONGRATULATES!
(AFTER)'BIRHTERS' heads explode all over the US !!
It's a great day in America.
And, from the Bronx neighborhood where she was raised to downtown Manhattan where she volunteered as a young lawyer, Latinos celebrated the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor as the first Hispanic justice to the U.S. Supreme Court.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124955682673110…
Party on 'Garth'!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:03 am
The forensic meaning of “best evidence” comes during the criminal proceedings, stevie. Not there yet. In clinical medicine, “best evidence” has yet another meaning; look up evidence-based medicine sometime.
Much of the world, little lawyer, goes on outside the Byzantine rituals of your racket, and gets to fact-finding without the duplicity and mendacity in which you were trained.
“If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble,… “the law is a ass—a idiot.”
Don’t that just beat the Dickens?
Now, a real, print-on-paper, signed and sealed Hawaii state Certification of Live Birth “is indeed a certified copy.”
Okay, stevie. But a JPG image of such a certified copy is not the certified copy itself, is it?
So where’s that “certified copy,” stevie?
That “certified copy” needs to be put before a judge or other competent officer of justice who is capable of determining – through expert witness testimony and other means of verification – that said “certified copy” is an unaltered, valid, and true copy, reflecting accurately the contents inscribed thereupon by the issuing agency.
So your Mombasa Messiah has that “certified copy,” right?
Fine! Let him bring it forth, and let it be verified, and clear his good name – whichever in hell he’s using at the moment – and resolve this issue.
Or are you going to continue lying your ass off, stevie, about how your beloved Barry is under no such obligation in law, and how he is privileged to refuse all such requests, and immune from any responsibility to respond to the private citizens whose public servant he has sworn an oath to be?
Aw, stevie. You’re looking so very, very “stupd” right now. Truly.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:07 am
Why not? All journalism school majors are created equal.
And “best evidence” (as I’ve observed) in the parlances of non-lawyers is not “the Best Evidence Rule.” You’re constipatedly fixed upon the world of ritual in which you shysters lurk and from the shadows of which you pounce upon honest citizens that you think it the world entire, don’tcha?
And stevie? Do hold your breath. Hold it until I tell you to exhale.
I’ll get back to you real soon, I promise.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:17 am
Now, THIS is interesting:
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/…
FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds Subpoenaed, Set to ‘Break’ Gag Order Unless DoJ Intercedes
Former agency translator called to testify in Ohio election case this Saturday on Turkish infiltration of U.S. government…
Unless the Dept. of Justice re-invokes their twice-invoked “state secrets privilege” claim in order to once again gag former FBI translator-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, her attorneys have notified the department by hand-delivered, sworn letter of declaration [PDF] this week, that she intends to give a public deposition, open to the media, in response to a subpoena this Saturday in Washington D.C..
Edmonds has confirmed her intentions to answer any questions asked of her during the sworn proceedings, fully and publicly, during conversations with The BRAD BLOG this week. She notes that her agreement with her former employer, the FBI — who fired her illegally after she filed whistleblower allegations about corruption and foreign infiltration in the linguistics department — includes certain non-disclosure requirements. However, those requirements do not preclude her answering to a legally issued court subpoena.
______
don't be disabused, (after)'birthers', i'm not saying your incessant jibber jabber doesn't 'amuse' me, but, until and unless you come up with something like 'proof' i'm 'outtie'.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:20 am
Tsk. For an “ex-English major” you got precisely zip in the way of philology, didn’tcha, stevie? In the Western world, all writing is designed to convey phonetic significance, word-symbols used in vocalization. Only those crippled by “look-say” training take words as the equivalent of ideograms; normal people sound them out, if only subvocally, and interpret them with the involvement of Broca’s area in the temporal cortex. Electroencephalographic evaluations established this decades ago, and positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning has confirmed it.
Only the congenitally deaf – and the hearing unimpaired who had been wrongly inculcated with the “look-say” method originally devised to teach deaf children how to read – do not “hear” what they read.
And thank you for the open expression of your arrogance, counselor, and your formal acknowledgement that in your personal view of society and its relationship with civil government, the officers of said government are above and beyond the law.
That says all anyone will ever need to know about you, little stevie. Back in 1776, I’d've looked for you in a green jacket, a thoroughgoing Tory, and an enemy of your neighbors’ liberties. Good on ya, stevie. You know your place in the great scheme of things, don’t you?
As for Dubbya, you silly sack of shit, once you’ve acknowledged that a socialist “public servant” cannot be held to any responsibility to the citizenry, you’ve conceded that a Republican malefactor-in-public-office can’t be held consequent either. Ain’t that nice?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:26 am
Aw, stevie. You got the mistaken impression that I consider Obamaphiles people? Nah! Plastic dummies at best. Animated puppets with strings being jerked out of Messiah Central. The best I can say about you asswipes is that you seem to have at least a leechs capacity for suffering.
A leech’s appetite, too.
I just enjoy the endless opportunities to grind it in. You keep pushing that “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!” horsehockey, and I get to observe that you – like your Mombasa Messiah – are a bunch of fucking frauds slithering from shadow to shadow, terrified of the daylight.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:29 am
Little stevie, since you had the penectomy en route to the completion of your sex change, who are you to be talking about phallic structures except in your fellative capacity?
And who would want to irrumate you, stevie? Jeez, I gotta piss through that pizzle of mine. You think I’m gonna unzip anywhere near your face? Gak!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:34 am
The best part? Republicans only hate her because they think she's Mexican. Once they find out that she's Puerto Rican, then…well, they'll probably still hate her. These are Republicans we're talking about, after all. Unless a Spanish-speaking woman is either raising their kids or willing to go “south of the border” while the wife is somewhere screwing the poolboy, the 'publicans don't have have a whole lot of use for brown people.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:43 am
Nah. In June 2008 Barry had one of his ACORN flunkies supposedly – that word is “supposedly” – scan an alleged (repeat: “alleged”) Hawaii state certification of live birth apparently issued in 2007 to one “Barack Hussein Obama II” and send computer graphic images> of that purported document to a couple of Obamaphile Web sites, DailyKos and FactCheck.
And then – surprise! – that 2007 COLB just vanished into thin air!
Except for a wonderfully unverified (that's “unverified”) orgy of Obama worship in the office of the Annenberg Foundation employees at FactCheck a bit later in June 2008, where these “impartial” (that's “lying bastardly”) ex-journalism school crank-yankers claimed to have seen and fondled and masturbated over their Holy One's “birth certificate.”
Now, these ex-journalism school crank-yankers – precisely none of whom are qualified, trained, experienced forensics documents examiners – neither attested under oath nor presented themselves in a court of law to offer whatever their opinions are worth (read: “not one fucking little bit”) on the validity of whatever it is they were given to ooh! and aah! over.
And whatever in hell had been ooh'd and aah'd over in the office of FactCheck in June 2008 – which must exist if the claims of that lying, worthless, “poverty pimp” sad sack of shit currently masquerading as President of these United States to “natural born citizen” status are to be proven (as in “burden of proof”) – has yet to be put before an impartial, objective, duly authorized officer of any court of law for conveyance to one or more properly trained, experienced, and qualified examiners of forensic documents for evaluation and sworn opinion in testimony as to it's “genuineness or non-genuineness.”
Y'see, Rat-bopy, having “posted” computer graphic images of something does not equal having put the real, print-on-paper, signed and sealed legal document itself into the hands of anyone qualified to tell whether the fucking thing is or is not valid proof that your Mombasa Messiah had been born in Honolulu or in his beloved native Africa.
So there is no valid reason for Rat-boy to continue breathing. You dead yet, Rat-boy?
What, no sense of decency?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:44 am
Not so. What about fantasy sports leagues? Those, which are popular with Republicans, are chock full of brown people. I mean as athletes, not as fantasy players.
Brown people tend to play sports. Republicans tend to fantasize about playing sports, or about the brown people who play them.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:51 am
It amazes me that the top 1 percenters have this army of white trash (birthers, tea-baggers, town hall meeting shouters, abortion doctor shooters) running around doing their dirty work so they can get their tax cuts back. They could care less about these plumbers and six packers who are loosing their health care so they can keep sending their money away to UBS and avoid paying thier share. When will these bottom feeding Republican common folk figure out that they are just being used by the right wing?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:09 am
Here again for all you freaks to look at are pictures of what real birth certificates from Hawaii look like. I'm not going to waste more time with Steviemonkey and Kenthemonkeyfucker, letting them be “big men on the keyboard” by being soooooooo brave and cheeky. Back to the facts. No long form from Obama. No proof of US birth. No eligibility for POTUS. Period. End of story. He is done. Get used to it or fuck off and die. Check out these images. Who would have thought such things existed or that anyone could have gotten their hands on them? These are actual images of Hawaiian CertIFCATES of Live Birth!! Oh, my god! How did these insignificant little people manage to have these in their own possession? Some may even be photocopied from the originals in Hawaiian records vaults. You know what this means? They have even said in Hawaii that something like this exists there for Obama. Check them out. For those of you who can't quite grasp the difference between a CertIFICATION of Live Birth and a CertiFICATE of Live Birth, click on the links and look at the pretty pictures. Dave Weigel, this means you!
http://passportsusa.com/wp-content/gallery/pass…
Edith Costa
http://www.cfourstrategies.com/colb.jpg
Blank
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
Alan ? 1963
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-content/upl…
Nordyke 1961 (A day after Obama)
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/HawaiinBirt…
anonymous from 1978
http://patriotpost.us/images/broadcasts/humor/i…
Only doctor signed birth certificate yet to surface for Obama but could be a forgery.
Oh, yes, and then there is this “Certification” from “Factcheck”(?)which has not been seen or handled outside of any of the Obama-friendly sources that have posted different versions using scans and digital photos posted on line. This is all Obama has ever offered as proof that he was born on US soil. Notice there is no mention of a hospital or the name of any attending physician. Hawaii has now admitted that an original long form exists or have lied and said there is one when there isn’t. Since it has never been posted or released by Obama, there is no way to know what it might say. But here is what Obama’s people offer.
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
Obama’s version of a CertifiCATION of Live Birth (probably a forgery).
Where is Obama's long form you fucking monkeys?? Answer that or shut the fuck up!
You stupid, cowardly, twisted, fucks. I deleted all your fucking replies below and won't even waste my time with them any more. Just morons, all of you. Can't answer a question so you always just attack with your stupid school yard obscenities. Pathetic wastes of protoplasm. None of you are worth the cost of the bullet it would take to relieve us of you. But I would gladly pay the price and do the deed myself anyway. It is coming. It is coming soon.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:30 am
most of the poor bastards, the (after)'birhters' populating this thread, and tea baggers on others aren't 'capable' of independent 'thought'. so… the short answers is, they aren't going to 'figure out' they are being used…ever.
the reich-wing of the reTHUG party, and the theocrats of the AmeriKan Taliban/C Street denizens, the Family know this and have no compunctions about using these 'proles' to their own ends.
what progressives have to FINALLY decide is whether we want to 'get into the game' and, fight fire with fire or, sit on the sidelines lamenting how fu*king stupid the 'proles' are and arguing about how best to educate/enlighten them.
i say, use 'em. and, they'll be better off for it. just STOP trying to talk sense to 'rocks', it's a guaranteed waste of time. 2X4 'em, then, when you have their attention, turn 'em.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:31 am
“Back to the facts?”
Two problems.
Back is a preposition that implies you were EVER dealing with facts. You were not.
Secondly, none of what you posted has the slightest intersection with any fact. I like how you ignore reality and the oft-repeated words of Republican-governed Hawai'ian officials.
You did, however, manage to repeat your juvenile “reply to all” threats. Last time you were going to “put steel up all [our] asses” for “crossing swords” with you. Now you're saving your allowance for a silver bullet to kill us with.
We're not vampires, dumbfuck. We're just not idiotic racist birthers, like you.
Enjoy your paranoid bullshit ranting. What ever happened to your sniveling attempt to tell me that “none of [my] insults could ever affect [you] in the slightest?” Looks to me like you're pretty upset, big fella! Did you bring a change of panties, now that you've gone and soiled yourself again?
Keep it up. The posting, that is. I know that despite your monkey's best techniques, you cannot keep your flaccid flag at anything more than half-mast.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:32 am
Orly should hang her head in shame and disappear, much to the joy of everyone.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:35 am
'cheeky'…? susie, you are SO fu*king gay. and, reposting that trash, again. complete with a threat 'without a veil' this time. must be back from a 'liquid dinner' like that fag George Sodini needed to attack helpless women. not impressed, susie.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:38 am
Me too.
Oops. We gotta be careful, Jim. If you keep writing the same kind of thing I write, darpot the Joker will think we’re the same person.
Wait a minute. Joker already thinks that. Carry on.
Palin for Primary Wrecker in 2012! Can you imagine the carnage she’s going to do to moderate Republicans, and thus the GOP’s chances to win a meaningful number of House seats or ANY national election?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:44 am
Eh, I think we're now 40 years into the Southern Strategy, henry.
The rural poor whites need to be told that they're better than SOMEONE or else they won't do the low-paid, dangerous work required of them by urban rich whites. (See, e.g., Irish-American immigration in 19th Century East Coast towns – why do you think there are so many Irish cops? Because established whites told Irish people that they couldn't hang out with them, but at least they weren't niggers…)
People who are xenophobes and cling to guns and thump Bibles need to be told that the Other is out there and wants in, so that they will keep donating money to the NRA and supporting the Christian Coalition.
People who are afraid of being bred out of the majority by immigrants from brown countries need to be told a fiction of a lily-white American History that makes them believe the U.S. became an industrialized nation without slave labor; that the railroads built themselves while the lazy, shiftless Chinese played their own version of checkers and drank tea; and that white men and ONLY white men fought in every major battle of every war since the American Revolution.
So we're 40 years into it. I don't see the Southern Strategy ending any time soon. Look what they did to Sotomayor. Jeff Sessions, who LOST his bid for appellate judge when it was revealed that he'd told a white colleague that he was a “traitor to his race” for representing a black person (and also made what he later called “jokes” about not having any problem with the Klan until he learned that they “were a bunch of pot-smokers.”)
http://mediamatters.org/research/200907140058
I couldn't be happier that the Republican party has decided to double down on the Southern Strategy. I want America to progress and I cannot think of a better way than by shining a light on these foul, dark, hideous creatures. Fuck them all. Time for us to get our country back.
The birthers are the best advertising (FREE, no less!) that Democrats and Independents could hope for. Just with the Sotomayor debacle, the GOP cost itself any shot at recapturing the Hispanic vote that they lost to Obama.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:49 am
Upon reflection, my favorite part is where he tries to include David Weigel in his gibberish.
The only other birther doofus to do that is 24ahead dot bomb.
But it's good to know that he has such a way with words. Very persuasive, especially where he starts out by addressing the readers of his post as “you freaks.” Maybe a bit of a risk to tell people to “fuck off and die” if they don't agree with his gibberish though.
Then again, what do I know? He didn't get those six, count 'em six, points on his account by being a birther fuckwit… or did he?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:01 am
See, what I like about you is that you’re stupid. You take a long time to get through saying it (wouldn’t it be “writing it?” not to you, because you’re stupid, remember…). But you’re stupid nonetheless.
You showed it twice here. So I got double the usual fun.
First you confirm your idiocy about what right a private citizen has to demand that an officeholder prove his qualifications to hold office to the citizen’s satisfaction.
You don’t have that right. Not because the British are coming, you dumb fucking birther, but because it’s not provided for in our system of laws. Those laws provide ample assurance to the people that qualifications that have been promulgated as requisites will be checked and established by those best positioned to do so. Government officials, in other words, check for those qualifications.
If you don’t like our system of laws, that’s fine. It doesn’t make sense to focus all your pretzel logic on ME as though I’m somehow a government sycophant.
Libertarians are wondrously inconsistent. Personal freedom is what you’re always on about. But you think the Constitution is a scrap of paper that you can wipe your feet, mouth, or ass with as you please. There are fundamental privacy rights inherent in one’s personal medical and birth records that you just jump right past. Rather inconsistent.
But then I did say you’re stupid. That’s the first instance. You don’t have the right to demand an official provide you with proof that he’s official. Otherwise it would waste everyone’s time.
Then you go on to completely misconstrue your flawed principle (that I somehow think a public official cannot be held to any responsibility to the citizenry) to mean that I should concede that no one could ever have a bone to pick with George W. Bush:
“once you’ve acknowledged that a socialist ‘public servant’ cannot be held to any responsibility to the citizenry, you’ve conceded that a Republican malefactor-in-public-office can’t be held consequent either.”
Once we run that through the wash to get rid of the taint of your socialist fixation, we’re left with a proposition that I never supported and don’t really have an opinion about. It’s nonsense, as usual.
I of course believe officials can be held responsible by the citizenry for their actions on behalf of the citizenry. That says NOTHING about whether citizens can demand that officials show them their ID.
Those two things are apples and oxen. You’re stupid.
See, that’s point two. Our officials are responsible to us, both in the form of a voting booth that is a job interview for new office seekers as well as a performance evaluation for incumbents, and in the form of official actions that take place through proper channels.
Bill Clinton was sued for personal conduct. I never said he was above the law. If Obama breaks the law, he is subject to prosecution by government authorities. If he is impeached, he has to turn in his White House Gym membership card. But that doesn’t mean he has to show it, or anything, to you.
One reason I write things to you is that people might read all your big words, obscure references, inverted syntax, and nonsensical digressions into morbid medical terminology and think you’re smart.
I enjoy reminding them that you’re stupid. Or you think they are.
Because you were all over the place here. You didn’t get away with the sleight of hand you tried to pull if you were being disingenuous. And you didn’t escape without being called on it if you were merely stupid.
Either way, the point remains. Obama doesn’t have to show you or anyone else his birth certificate. He showed it to the world a year ago. No other candidate, let alone sitting President, has done that.
So keep screeching about it. Keep using bold and italic font. Keep insulting him. That’s likely to earn the respect of objective readers and encourage them to take up your cause.
As soon as monkeys fly out of randypuppy’s butt.
Nice talking to you again, as you would say. Even though I’m writing and not talking. God you’re stupid. You really took two bloated and shit-strained paragraphs to defend the fact that your dumb ass wrote that you “can’t wait to hear” what I type to you!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:21 am
Do you see the irony in asking me if that was the best I could come up with, when you contributed nothing except “Curtsy Sniker Time?”
Who, or what, is Curtsy Sniker? I Googled it and came up empty. Please help.
I know what a curtsy is, but I’m not square-dancing with you so that can’t be it.
I know what a Snicker’s bar is. Not it either.
I don’t laugh behind your back, so I’m not snickering.
Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you? You’re too dumb for words. Yet you’re somehow unable to stay away.
First you use the system to “follow” my username and track my comments, so I guess that makes you some sort of stalker.
Then you respond to multiple posts (that are not even addressed to you) with clueless nonsense that demonstrates you have no understanding of reality.
Your Mac users’ forum post is a stark example. Sarah Palin’s tweets about Alaska flew right past you, huh? Stay away from heavy machinery, Joker.
Thinking I’m two people, and that one or both of me is getting paid by Obama to write comments mocking dumbasses in this obscure liberal newspaper 3.5 years before an election and doing so about comments on an issue over which not a single vote will change is another example.
Your selective sensitivity about “school yard taunts” as applied to me but not to the bizarre and unequaled insane death threats issued by Randwulf is a third example.
Your inability to refrain from posting the childish and empty “Is that the best you can come up with?” line is a fourth.
I think we’ll stop there before I start laughing about the fact that you twice revealed that you don’t know the difference between “your” and “you’re.” It’s not a typo when you do it twice. It’s that “your” dumb as a post.
So have fun following me around, Joker. I don’t mind. It’s amusing to watch you struggle to keep up.
I will say you’re going to have to work harder if you’re going to make it. You at least might want to try to work on being able to tell me apart from jimpa. Hard to avoid mocking you if you can’t figure out something that simple.
Then again, you are apparently a birther. Let’s not set our sights too high for what you’re capable of figuring out.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:29 am
I'm interested in finding out why none of your links work. No, wait, none except for the second one. If this is your proof, you need to double-check yourself. It doesn't reflect well on you when you post dead links.
Are you actually threatening people now? Maybe it's time to back away and do some yoga or something. You seem to have an anger management problem. Go break some plates or scream into a pillow. Put your fist through a wall. It might just help.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:34 am
“I'm interested in finding out why none of your links work.” My thoughts exactly. The one like that doses work really doesn't prove anything. Well at least to me.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:44 am
LOL. Good one.
Especially the frauds part. Given that we’re on a thread below an article about the forged Kenyan birf sirtifikat.
I like how you keep trying to write (“say” in test-taker logic) that you’re merely calling the question, when in fact you’re just making up bullshit and putting it in bold font.
You slither from shadow to shadow.
You have no answer for ANY evidence except to posit, as though it means a fucking thing, that the COLB online is not the same thing as holding the piece of paper in your hands and weeping over the fact that it says what you fucking well know it says.
You cannot address why all those right-wing credible and non-credible publications and credible right wing journalists have gone on record indicating the birther conspiracy theory is just flat out refusal to accept the results of a legitimate election.
You cannot address why Republican governed state officials would lie to protect a new Democratic President.
All you can do is throw up your hands and insult everyone with absurd overuse and misuse of the term “Socialist.”
You have no recourse except to post multiple fantasies about how great it would be if your dream of Obama getting forcibly raped in prison came true.
You have no proof and you have no intention of looking for any. You keep ignoring actual law, all while calling yourself a Constitutionalist.
it’s just so fucking stupid I don’t even know why I bother.
Oh yeah, because I loathe you and want to keep reminding you of how stupid you are.
You ignore the law and pretend that it, and lawyers, are somehow inapplicable to the “common man” and the court of “public opinion.”
You continue to run from the words “burden of proof” like randypuppy runs from his mother when his panties get soiled.
You can make up nonsense all you want.
Doesn’t change the fact that you are a disturbed conspiracy theorist with no scruples, no logical reasoning skills, and no sense of when you’re being exposed over and over again as an utter fool.
I never tire of reading the posts of other people who tell you that you’re the craziest birther here.
Keep pissing into the wind, wretch. I want to “hear” it. Dumb fuck.
I haven’t seen proof that you’re a doctor. What are YOU hiding, you slimy sonofabitch?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:57 am
Like I told you, wretch, you’re stupid. And only you would rhapsodize on and on as you do about prison sex and who you want to “irrumate.”
Calling you stupid is insulting to the other birthers I have called stupid.
Which, come to think of it, is precisely what I want to do. You’re all stupid.
You’re just a special, extra-concentrated variant of stupid.
Keep it up. We all know what your interests are. Prison sex! Dumb fucking closet fag birther.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:00 am
I’m gonna go with the coded message to Putin not to rear his head over Alaskan airspace.
If it was the “you have to be high” thing then I gotta believe our friends on the left (and a few on the right) would have translated the “lyrics” to English from Palinese for us by now.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:10 am
Tsk, tsk, Private Joker!
You already used the “Is this the best you can do thing” on ME, remember?
Now you’re writing the same thing to jimpa, who you continue to think is me.
Does your mother leave you alone in the house at all? Because there are a lot of hazards around the house that might hurt you. Any electrical outlets should be covered. Pot handles on the stove should be turned toward the back of the stove. Cabinet doors should be child-proofed.
Let’s see…
randypuppy is a monkey-addled Armageddon-predicting racist doofus…
test-taker is a rotting racist husk who pretends to be libertarian when it suits him but abandons law, logic, and reality in frequent and amusingly overwrought hysterical postings….
and Private Joker is too stupid to recognize overt sarcasm OR contribute ANYthing, even something stupid, to a conversation.
“Is that the best you can do?” Indeed. I would ask you the same thing. But I wouldn’t want to make you cry. This IS the best you can do, isn’t it?
I will go out on a limb. So far, Joker, I have seen no evidence that you are a racist. I don’t recall any post where you actually advanced a birther argument. You merely snark, or try to.
So I will not call you a racist unless I see confirmation of that issue. I will just stick with calling you a dumb ass. You have confirmed that for us multiple times.
Keep ‘em coming, Joker!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:13 am
Agreed about the new wave, jim.
You know what it is? I think it’s an influx of people who came here from right-wing sites like RedState and TownHall. Weigel posted articles about the comment boards there, and showed how a lot of people were referring to TWI and to Weigel, and I think a lot of them are cruising through here.
And I think new publicity in the form of the explosive story of the Kenyan forgery has brought new traffic to the site.
Third, the existing birthers and the new wave are really getting calcified and dug into their positions. They can see that their movement is being mocked and discredited, that the right wing establishment does not support them, and that their cries fall on deaf ears.
This pisses them off. Randwulf and Tuci78 come to mind.
But it’s ok. Better to have them come here and identify themselves and their thoughts than sit at home stroking a gun. Or a monkey.
Oh, and the peanut reaction thing. Yeah yeah, don’t remind me that I was civil to the test-taker.
But are you referring to the part about “irresponsible would have been pretending not to have birth control?”
Far be it from me to pull a scoundrel move like that. Unless, of course, Salma showed up, with or without the PB sandwich. Then I’m not responsible for my actions. She’s older than me. She can make up her own mind!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:14 am
Aw, stevie. How cute. Using “stupid” as if you understood two-syllable words, and everything. I’d give you a cookie, but I know your keepers don’t want you eating after midnight.
They getting enough of that fluphenazine decanoate aboard your aching little ass, stevie? Taking your haloperidol like a good boy? Not sedating you enough, are they? Well, that can be adjusted….
Let’s see; anything of substance? Nope. Squealing, grunting, howling, trying to fling poo but failing for lack of manual dexterity – those antipsychotics really fuck up your ability to focus your eyes, don’t they, stevie?
Just the usual and customary stevie. Such a little “team leader” he is!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:29 am
You’re halfway there, wretch.
You remembered to direct a sexual reference at me, but you forgot to do the same thing to Obama.
Oh and more asinine medical terminology. Never gets old!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:30 am
Okay, psychotic little weasel stevie is decompensating again. What’s he free-associating this time?
Hm. More about how private citizens have no rights that any elected or appointed officer of civil government need respect. Heard that before.
More crap about how the Constitution is somehow supposed to be binding on the private citizen instead of upon the officer of civil government. The perfect reverse of what is, in fact, the reality of government under the prescriptions and proscriptions of that charter. Not only a psychotic but a psychotic lawyer. Gawd.
More running away from the realities of socialism, and evasion of acknowledgment of how government control of market activities for any purpose is not capitalism – a government free of such violent extortion to “pick winners” for political purposes – but (when done “in the name of society”) socialism no matter how great or little the degree of government intrusion….
Well, hell, he’s supposed to be an “ex-English major,” and as innocent of political economics as the proverbial beasts that perish.
Crap about “If Obama breaks the law…” when having run for election as the president of these United States under multiple false attestations as to his “natural born citizen” status while refusing to provide proof of said qualification when called upon to do so isn’t criminal in so many ways that not even cock-sucking little stevie can really deny these offenses….
Again and again, claims of privilege and immunity for stevie’s Messiah that no citizen is ever supposed even to dare to question, for this is a sin against the sacred words of the prophet Marx and an insult to Allah himself…
Yeah, stock, standard stevie. Empty noise, lots of rage, an overload of bullshit.
Well, it’s nice to see that some things never change. You can count on old stevie.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:36 am
Means no such thing.
Hawaii policies do not trump Constitutional Law.
Bummer for you.
Now lick your way out of your sh!t hole.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:44 am
Aw, now he’s fantasizing about sexual interests among his caretakers. Projection. I’m two or three thousand miles away from his left-coast rubber room, and little stevie thinks I lust for his (yech!) body. Gawd, I pity his keepers.
Not even in the farm days of my youth, stevie. Only humans for me, and then only of the female variety. Besides, I’m married, and she’s much better with a shotgun than I am.
So they making sure you get enough hand lotion, stevie? You don’t use something to slick up your pizzle, you’re gonna rub it raw, going on like that.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:46 am
Test-taker, you’re so ridiculous it’s not even annoying anymore.
You used to be a bit unpredictable.
“crap about “If Obama breaks the law…” when having run for election as the president of these United States under multiple false attestations as to his “natural born citizen” status while refusing to provide proof of said qualification when called upon to do so isn’t criminal in so many ways that not even cock-sucking little stevie can really deny these offenses….”
I’m going to ignore the repeated reference to oral sex. We know you’re a closet homosexual. As I said, predictable.
But you have NO proof that ANY of Obama’s qualifications are falsified. He DID provide proof. COLB. Last year. Didn’t need to do that. No one else ever has.
You’re a racist fuckwit for even arguing the point.
Period. End of story.
The rest of it is your sister-fucking-crazy bullshit.
I don’t care that you don’t know the first thing about capitalism. Jim whats-his-name wrote a whole dissertation on your idiotic misconstruction of socialism, so I won’t plow furrowed earth by going over it again.
I don’t even care about your obvious mental instability.
I just want to keep poking you to watch your rotting racist husk take 50 words to say “ouch.”
Let’s see…does your post have any content? No.
Does it refute the MULTIPLE challenges I have issued to you to explain why your dumbfuck conspiracy theory has been denounced as such by right-wing credible news outlets and respected right wing journalists as well as prominent if not respected right wing talk show hosts? No.
Does it have any answer as to why all the government officials would lie? No.
But, as I said, you DID work in a sexual reference about me.
Some things never change. You’re still a piece of shit, Tuci. I hope your grandchildren get bone cancer and you kill them in a car accident after they’ve suffered through lingering pain worse than Obama’s mother did. I would use randypuppy’s words, “fuck off and die,” but I want you to live through the experience and re-live it, and your fault for it, every fucking day of your wretched, hate-filled life. Because you deserve that. You are without a doubt the worst person I have ever encountered personally, and I deal with liars and frauds for a living.
I know that you won’t go away just because I insult you and call you on your idiocy.
The more ridiculous your position, the more strenuously you proclaim it. The less evidence you have, the surer you are that you’re right.
So keep coming back here. Many people think you’re an Obama supporter and you just write the things you do so that people will be repulsed from your positions as crudely expressed by you.
I don’t think that. Mocking the handicapped? Not a liberal move.
Reading the news to find out that you killed your own cancer-stricken grandkids? To use a quote you once used, there’s “a consummation devoutly to be wished,” eh test-taker?
Sleep well. I want you rested and fired up for tomorrow. Gonna be another long day of batshit craziness for you.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:49 am
How are those grandchildren, wretch?
Better tell them to buckle up.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:55 am
Anything beyond the same old little stevie shit? Some yammering about how “Jim” had gotten some kind of traction in our exchange about political economics when I’d sent him yelping off into the darkness. Not hard. The laws of economics work – like the laws of physiology – as they must, and there’s no getting around ‘em.
More empty stevie blather, more malicious silliness, more of everything stevie.
It’s communicating with stevie that makes me glad I don’t have to round on the NP ward more than once or twice a month any more.
If he really is a lawyer, what does this say about the California state Bar Association? Gawd!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:59 am
–”Where is Obama's long form you ____ing monkeys”–
——————
Your wasting your time, both cnhaynes & stephenperry-jimpa have no answer.
That is why the two of them switched topics to “… finding out why none of your links work” and went with their usual school-yard taunts.
Say stephenperry-jim do you get paid twice for shilling for Obama?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:01 am
“Much of the world, little lawyer, goes on outside the Byzantine rituals of your racket…”
If that’s true, I suppose I should count myself lucky that the President’s eligibility for office is something that happens to fall within the law’s purview.
COLB. Prima facie evidence. Janice Okubo said the COLB says the same thing as the original vital records – born in Hawai’i, natural born citizen, nothing further to add. Birth announcements settled it for the lingering few people who were actually looking at this as if it could be real and not a conspiracy theory.
You’re one to talk about lying one’s ass off. Never have I seen you post a link that supports your asinine whiny “calling of the question.” Yet you fall all over yourself while slobbering in your haste to show us some obscure bullshit from 1932 from a French theoretical physicist about the best time to plant daffodils. So you know how your computer doo-hickey works. You just don’t have anything on your side but hatred and racism.
You ARE stupid. I cannot help pointing out what I see in front of me.
That is one thing that separates me from you. You cannot help but ignore what you see in front of you, just so you can go on ranting and raving about a birth certificate while you insult the President.
You can lie. You can insult. You can keep trying to direct sexual references at me. That’s all well and good. It does NOTHING to advance your argument. I don’t have to worry about reading any facts from you. We know you’re a worthless fuck who’s just aching with rage over the Presidential election.
That’s nice. When you get enough American Grand Jury members, you can all get drunk together.
Until then, go back to driving your grandchildren around, wretch. Enjoy whatever time you have left together. You’re not getting any younger, and they’re not getting any healthier. Better to enjoy your time rather than sit there paralyzed with idiotic rage about the President’s race.
God knows I enjoy fucking with you about how stupid you are! I know what you will say by now, which does take some of the luster away. But, in this economy, why look a gift horse in the mouth?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:05 am
–”We're not vampires, dumbf-ck. We're just not idiotic racist birthers, like you.”–
———-
Yes, you do exceed your accusation.
Your a dumbf_cking idiotic racist vampire that sucks the life out of any attempt at a civil discussion. :D
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:09 am
Israeli agent Orly Taitz is screwing americans and Obama. Look, israelis want you americans, to attack the Iran and to send the troops there, to speel the american blood, and for what? Just because israelis hate iranians, but israelis have no power, no courage to do it! Now they put a pressure on Obama hoping that he will order U.S. troops to attack Iran.
As simple as that.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:13 am
Show of hands from anyone who thinks test-taker sent Jim Norman (forgot his name at first) yelping off into the darkness.
Ok, that’s darpot the Joker and Randwulf the monkeymolester. Saw that one coming. No one else? Really?
I will refresh your recollection. Three days ago, on the “Andrew McCarthy embarrasses National Review” thread, Jim Norman wrote the following, rather long but well worth reading post about Tuci78′s misuse of commonly bandied-about terms like “Socialism”:
_________________________
“I’m grateful to Tuci78 for continuing to prove my point (see below in this thread) that he’s wearing ideological blinders, and for distilling his argument to its essence. When I point out that he suffers from either-or thinking, he gladly affirms this, thereby proving his faulty logic. Since I am not going to convince Tuci of anything, I’m going to write for anyone who may be undecided on this discussion.
To recap, Tuci overuses the word “socialism.” This is a common problem in American discourse. It’s rhetorical trickery to call something socialism when it isn’t—a bait-and-switch that’s supposed to invoke fear. When someone calls something “socialist,” you’re supposed to think of the totalitarianism of the Soviet Union or other communist states of the last century, and you’re supposed to think of tyranny. But an honest debater will use clearly defined terms and not equivocate. Equivocating is “the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning or sense.” In this case, “socialism” is used in the broadest sense possible, but its use is meant to evoke fears of the tyranny that arose as a result of Marxist revolutionaries taking control of the means of production and distribution in the last century. The traditional meaning of the word is indeed limited to government or collective ownership of the means of production and distribution, as per any number of dictionaries.
Tuci, however, wants to expand the use of the word to mean anything less than a completely free market. In his words, any limitation of economic activity, outside of regulations designed to deter the “violation of market participants’ rights through force or fraud” amounts to directing “the government’s “goons with guns” to compel actions” which a someone else deems favorable, and this person is by definition a socialist. Tuci here is saying that any limitation of economic activity which goes outside the limits specified is socialism, and that it is tyrannical.
When I pressed Tuci on the extreme, either/or, black-or-white illogic to this view, he agreed with me:
Me, characterizing Tuci: “And there is absolutely no room for the existence of the sincerely progressive politician or for the right of a sovereign people to have any say in how its economics are run.”
Tuci: “Precisely. NO RIGHT, and therefore ‘no room.’”
Me, characterizing Tuci: “ALL progressive politicians are corrupt liars, only seeking to fool the electorate and gain more power for themselves, and ALL actions by the citizens of a nation limiting economic activity beyond your strict limits are socialistic tyranny.”
Tuci: “Thank you.”
So Tuci agrees that he sees the issue of free markets vs. socialist tyranny as being one or the other.
This is fallacious thinking, per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dillema): “The informal fallacy of false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy) involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there are other options. Closely related are failing to consider a range of options and the tendency to think in extremes, called black-and-white thinking. Strictly speaking, the prefix “di” in “dilemma” means “two”. When a list of more than two choices is offered, but there are other choices not mentioned, then the fallacy is called the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses.”
So, Tuci’s thinking is wrong.
This all began when I accused Tuci of being trapped in an ideological understanding of the world. More precisely, his model of how the world works is flawed, because his reasoning is flawed, as outlined above. Since this worldview allows for no gray areas or possibilities outside what it predicts, it can’t be correct. If Tuci said, “This is my model of how the world works, and it’s basically true. There are, of course, exceptions,” then that would be one thing. But Tuci has so much faith in his model as to make it a religion or a scientific theory, practically speaking. Put another way, if Tuci’s model were a scientific theory (and Tuci apparently thinks it’s really that strong), it would have to predict correctly all events it purports to predict. If it didn’t, it would be wrong and have to be modified or discarded.
Depending on your politics and life experience, you may or may not agree with Tuci’s model. In my opinion, it’s pretty easy to find exceptions to his model—sincere progressive politicians, government employees who work hard and benefit the public, reasonable regulations that help everyone while not “tyrannizing” anyone, and progressive taxation are just a few examples.
Tuci’s model also has significant parallels with socialism itself, or more precisely, Marxism. Consider that his model and Marxism have the following in common:
-both are intellectual constructs, relying on Enlightenment-era faith in the capacity of man’s reason to understand the world
-both are utopian—Marx believing in a socialist paradise, Tuci apparently believing that only if government got out of the way, things would be a laissez-faire paradise
-both programs, if carried to their logical conclusion, don’t work out as intended
-both are based on a flawed understanding of human nature. Tuci’s understanding of human nature is strictly individualistic, and this is the basis of his entire understanding:
“the ‘basic unit of society’ is not the family – as socialist-inspired government indoctrination systems textbook have sold for generations – but the individual.
Therefore the rights of the individual – not the rights of the family, the rights of society, the rights of the community, the rights of the nation, none of which can properly be said to have “rights” at all, except as each individual participating therein has rights of his own – the rights of the individual is the moral foundation upon which all social order is predicated, and which the agents of government (if government can be said to have any legitimate purpose whatsoever) must work exclusively and diligently to defend.
No individual rights, no society. No protection of individual rights, no legitimacy for any government.
I certainly and strongly agree with the last sentence, as do almost all Americans, regardless of what Tuci thinks. I also believe that all governments which don’t rely on this insight have been failures. In my younger years, I signed up to fight and perhaps die for these values. However, it’s one thing to say that the basic unit of society is the individual, and another thing to then reduce the importance of groups or communities to next to nothing.
The reason that this is a flawed understanding of human nature is that humans are not isolated individuals. They exist in context, whether that context is family or community or nation, or all of the above. This is the experience of ages of human experience, of human religion, and even today of neuroscience, and only came to be questioned during the Enlightenment.
Consider the logical outcome if Tuci’s free market zealotry were put into practice. No longer is it possible to regulate economic activity in any way. Government shrinks to the strictly limited roles Tuci thinks it should be limited to. Do things stay that way? Or do parties with access—the rich and the powerful—start influencing the government to expand those powers in ways that benefit them? And then, now that government power is limited, except for being able to favor powerful, monied interests, who gets screwed?
Consider also the practical effect that Tuci’s politics, deriving from political economists like Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises, have on today’s American politics. I don’t know how Tuci votes, but in general, people of his political persuasion tend to vote Republican. They want “freedom” and “liberty,” but they tend to think of these narrowly, in mostly economic terms, so they go to the party which tends to favor less restrictions on business activity. However, in so doing, they are also supporting the party which likes to limit personal freedoms—the party which wants to be in your bedroom, your e-mail and phone conversations, above all your conscience, which wants to spend your money on illegitimate wars and torture people in your name, the party of social conformity which looks askance at people who don’t look like they do. I’m speaking broadly, but in general this is a good characterization of the Republican party.
But that’s what this libertarian nonsense brings us. I really do appreciate, and listen to, the libertarians when they remind me of the dangers of collectivist economics. But when they scream “socialist tyranny” all the time about things that aren’t socialism, and scare people into running the Republican party of limited personal freedoms, it’s a big net loss. I mean, who really thinks the rights of big corporations are more important than those of individual human beings? Isn’t that backwards? The Republican party’s motto should be: “Regulate people, not the economy.”
This will be my last post in this thread (you’re welcome!) because I have a family who needs me to start spending time with them again. Expect Tuci78’s response to do one or more of the following:
-Try to hurt my feelings by using naughty words
-Show how smart and well-read he is
-Walk a fine line between cheeky “tweaking of my nose” and suppressed anger
Enjoy!”
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:22 am
I am an American.
I am the part you won't recognise.
But get used to me.
Black, confident, cocky.
My name, not yours.
My religion, not yours.
My goals, my own.
Get used to me.
Muhammad Ali
Or President Barack Hussein Obama
You lost, We won.
Get used to it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:24 am
Nope. Not even in the court of public opinion.
You don’t get to break state law pertaining to record keeping and privacy of personal information, or circumvent Federal laws of evidence and rules of civil procedure.
People can clamor to know what killed Michael Jackson. That’s public opinion. No laws provide a right for them to find out on their own.
People can demand that John Ensign or Mark Sanford tell them details about their sexual misadventures. It’s compelling stuff. They’re undoubtedly hypocritical and seamy guys. But there’s not a private right of action.
People, of course, will judge without evidence and form conclusions without analysis. That happens every day and is unimportant.
So you and your fellow conspiracy theorists are free to go on screeching about how there’s been NO PROOF, NONE about Obama’s eligibility.
You’re just lying to yourself. You’re not even lying to us. None of us believes that you’re serious. You’re just unwilling to face reality.
And that’s where I come in. I am here to remind you that you lost the election. My side won. That’s the way it is. If you don’t like it, wonderful.
Make up some more gibberish about public servants having to answer to you. Or go dig up Ayn Rand and fuck her. I don’t care. Either way you can’t get any more pathetic than you are, wretch.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:27 am
Ah, but you well know I’m not relying solely upon a COLB.
Hawai’ian state officials, right wing journalists, right wing newspapers, right wing websites, stop me when you’ve “heard” this already, wretch.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:29 am
Okay, big OCD smoke here, lots of selective cut-and-paste, and a “Nyah-Nyah, I’m gonna run and you can’t find me” at the end. Cool.
Little stevie, can I show some medical students this post? Please?
Funny thing, the silly little twit quotes me as if I’m wrong, and then says to all and sundry, “Look how he’s wrong!”
Wow.
And when I more or less recapitulated Thomas Paine’s Common Sense in a single paragraph:
“No individual rights, no society. No protection of individual rights, no legitimacy for any government.”
…little stevie shrieks in rage as if this is utterly alien to the American spirit, the American mind, and the basis upon which our society and our polity is predicated.
An “ex-English major” who knows nothing about history, either.
Oh, well. Someday they’ll get him properly medicated and he’ll have something to do besides playing with his feces all day long.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:29 am
Lie.
I never asked how you did on anything in your life, fuckwit. And the test you mentioned isn’t standardized.
That’s why I fuck with you about it.
Because it was stupid shit that you shouldn’t have invented.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:33 am
Wrong. It is a birth certificate. Ask the National Review Online:
“The fundamental fiction is that Obama has refused to release his “real” birth certificate. This is untrue. The document that Obama has made available is the document that Hawaiian authorities issue when they are asked for a birth certificate. There is no secondary document cloaked in darkness, only the state records that are used to generate birth certificates when they are requested.
If one applies for a United States passport, the passport office will demand a birth certificate. It defines this as an official document bearing “your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records.” The Hawaiian birth certificate President Obama has produced—the document is formally known as a “certificate of live birth”—bears that information. It has been inspected by reporters, and several state officials have confirmed that the information in permanent state records is identical to that on the president’s birth certificate—which is precisely what one expects, of course, since the state records are used to generate those documents when they are requested. In other words, what President Obama has produced is the “real” birth certificate of myth and lore.”
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTRjMTFhMzQxYmEzNjA2YWIwOTU4YWVjNzRmODE2NTI=
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:36 am
You’re confusing me for Jim Norman, wretch. See the quotation marks?
That said, your “no individual rights” bullshit is alarmist and irrelevant.
No one is talking about taking away all your individual rights. We’re talking about a birth certificate that you cannot prove is forged. Stop dramatizing everything, freak.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:44 am
An order issued by a court of law directing the provision of such archival information does not violate due process, does it, counselor? A private citizen breaking into the vaults – or a state bureaucrat standing up in a press conference to discuss the contents of an individual’s birth records – does. But that’s about it, right?
And the sexual misadventures of elected officials do not bear directly or even proximally upon their qualifications in law – and the Constitution is the law, isn’t it, stevie? – to hold the offices of public trust they occupy.
And when it comes to Barry’s bona fides with regard to his “natural born citizen” qualification to hold the office of President of these United States, said qualification has not been definitively proven until he has presented such a legal document as a birth certificate or even a Certification of Live Birth, printed upon paper, signed and sealed to ensure authenticity, intact and unaltered, complete in its contents, to such an objective authority as a sitting judge, who can ascertain its veracity and completeness by submitting that document – not the computer graphic image of said document, but the document itself – to trained, experienced, and therefore qualified forensic documents examiners capable of testifying under oath as to their impression of said document’s “genuineness or non-genuineness.”
But you’ve read this all before, stevie.
Until Barry humbly, respectfully, and responsibly tenders such a document – a brand new COLB from the government of the state of Hawaii, if he’d lost the 2007 document from which those images had allegedly been scanned, though the originating 2007 document would be better – to such a judge in one of the many cases the “birthers” are happy to bring, there has been provided “NO PROOF, NONE” about Barry’s qualification to have run for election, to have sworn an oath of office, or to occupy the office and exercise the powers of the presidency.
I don’t have to dig up anything out of Mrs. O’Connor’s works for this purpose. I daresay she never imagined that anything like this incredibly bold criminality could happen to these United States, if criminality is what it is.
But, little stevie, how much more pathetic can you Obamaphile fucktards possibly get in your campaign to give that sorry, sad sack of shit the “cover” you think he needs to keep his ass out of the federal penitentiary in which he so obviously belongs?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:48 am
Oh, not just common sense, shit-for-brains, but Common Sense, as in Thomas Paine’s work, published in 1776.
If you can get enough light under that porch in which your mother’s been keeping you since she caught you fucking the goats, you might want to read it sometime.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:57 am
No inventions necessary on my part, stevie. A collectivist like you really can’t get a handle on people who think and act as individuals, can you?
I’m no more part of any “movement” than I am part of some kind of hive mind. I take what I find useful from sources to which my attention is turned, and I evaluate it as best I can. If I err, I err honestly. I make no effort to dissemble or cloud or confuse. I try to be as lucid and complete and free of self-contradiction as I can, your paranoid accusations of “lies” to the contrary. You’re an asshole, stevie. I accept that. I’m bearing with you.
But if the whole world were of one opinion, and that opinion not supported and evidently either in error or potentially in error, and my contrary opinion were sound and satisfies me as to its reliability, I would not renounce my own opinion in favor of any other’s. It’s a matter of integrity.
Which I know, to a lawyer and an apoligist for socialism (in any admixture) and authoritarianism and collectivism and “progressive” government – rather too much like “progressive” cancer, methinks – that kind of personal integrity is utterly alien. Repugnant to you. Hateful to you.
But it’s what I have, and I must follow that sense of personal integrity where it leads.
And it pretty much leads me to the reasonable – if tentative – conclusion that your Mombasa Messiah is a fucking liar, a sneak, and a criminal guilty of myriads of felonies at both the state and federal levels, and for the sake of the Constitution, he must be nailed like the crook he almost certainly is.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:57 am
stephenperry and kennethetucker you are trolls. I mean, you are just trolling through this website insulting people left right and centre. What is wrong with you? Why do you want so badly to stifle any debate? Are you paid to do this?
You keep stating untruths as though they are facts and insult anybody who disagrees with you. Well, however much you try to make this go away (I assume that is what you have been paid to do?) , it won’t. This is spreading like wild fire.
All he has to do is show his birth certificate.
You keep on quoting “sources” who have “inspected” and “verified” but there are so many other, just as valid, sources who say the opposite. But you only define as a valid source anybody who agrees with your position.
You are crazy to give up the constitution for a few pennies. No matter how much they are paying you to do this, don’t you realize how low down the chain you are?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:59 am
Well, the neuroleptics are certainly hitting levels high enough to impair your memory, little stevie.
Looking for therapeutic effect now….
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:11 am
Well, little stevie, lucidity is not exactly your strong suite. Neither – for an “ex-English major” surprising – is consistency in punctuation.
Why don’t you express your own hatreds of individual rights as you see the necessity in order to achieve the Utopia you desire, stevie? Tell all your friends and neighbors why you despise them, and want them set under subordination to government power, and helpless in the presence of the civil masters you yourself worship so slavishly.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:48 am
You're off topic and wildly off base. You have no basis, for example, for referring to Taitz as an “Israeli agent.” Do you have proof that she is Israeli (rather than merely Jewish), let alone that she works for Mossad? Why not make things up about something else?
Because your premise is absurd. Jewish people in Israel are too powerless and cowardly to handle their own dirty work? That's your idea?
You're not only talking about the country that has Mossad, one of the most respected foreign intelligence services in the world, but do you recall the jets that dropped bombs on Osiris, devastating Saddam Hussein's nuclear facilities and forcing him to move the program literally underground?
Who flawlessly executed that bombing run all by itself when no other country had the, for lack of a better term, power and/or courage to do it?
Oh yeah, Israel.
Where, by the way, do you see any evidence of any pressure Israel, let alone Orly Taitz, has put on Obama to get him to use troops against Iran?
If you're going to fly off topic and make nonsense up, at least try not to slander a whole nation of people in the process next time, please.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:52 am
It is the obvious purpose of the shysterate, little stevie, to take every aspect of every American’s life, liberty, and property, into the purview of “the law” so that no man, woman, or child may do anything without the control of lawyers firm and vampirish upon them. That much is clear, is it not?
“Janice Okubo said the COLB says the same thing as the original vital records” in clear breach of Hawaii state statute law after in October 2008 having explained why she could not so stipulate. Had the law changed in the interval? Had Dr. Okubo broken the law more recently? Have you an opinion, counselor? It’s your Kabuki theater of proceduralism. Us lay folk are helpless in spite of our rage and hatred of you and your ilk.
Little stevie, diseased as you truly are, odious before your neighbors, parasitic in every aspect of your shriveled personality, vicious in your vindictiveness, tyrannous in your lusts, mendacious in your every word, and malignant in your very presence in the body politic, you would not know reasoned argument and honest dispute from the cloud of deceit in which you live every moment of your life, even to your forlorn aspiration to sit at the right hand of your Messiah and bask in what you conceive to be his achievements, all of which teeters on the fragile thread of his inability to present a humble, ordinary birth certificate to prove that he is qualified, and has the right to serve in the high elective office toward which he has literally spent his life scheming.
God knows you’re a pitiful little piece of shit, but like shit unflushed, you are a public health hazard, and until somebody yanks the chain and sends you down into the sewer where you belong, people are going to have to beware of you.
They got community notification on lawyers where you live, stevie?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:02 pm
Your “reasonable – if tentative – conclusion” is neither reasonable nor tentative, asshole.
You made up your mind a long time ago. This is why you are so utterly nonchalant about proof.
Lovely to see you wrap yourself in the individualist flag. You’re a birther dumbfuck and you’re lumped in with them.
The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, test-taker. But you’ll always be an idiot racist prick who didn’t have the guts to stand up and say so, but instead made death threats against the President in a liberal newspaper comment section.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:02 am
Please tell me that your new theory is that I'm jimpa. Please tell me that. I'm not as interested in finding out whether you really think I work for Obama. I get that one a lot. Never heard that I'm two people though.
What did cnhaynes fail to answer? Never mind, I'd rather know about the “I'm jimpa” thing, anyway.
But as to the question apparently posed by the monkeyfucker and seconded by you…
His long form is in Hawai'i, stored and maintained by Hawai'ian government officials tasked with doing just that. It is a “backup” and the information is also stored electronically, as stated by Janice Okubo:
“Hawai'i's Health Department confirmed yesterday that it has President Obama's original Aug. 4, 1961, birth certificate in storage, but the announcement is unlikely to satisfy conspiracy theorists who insist Obama was born in Kenya.
“We don't destroy vital records,” Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo said. “That's our whole job, to maintain and retain vital records.”
The Health Department's director reiterated yesterday that she has seen Obama's birth records.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai'i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai'i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai'i and is a natural-born American citizen,” Fukino said in a statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008, over eight months ago.”
Fukino tried on Oct. 31 to put an end to the belief among so-called “birthers” that Obama was not born in Honolulu's Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital. The birthers insist that Obama was not born in the U.S. and is therefore ineligible to be president.
Despite Fukino's statement yesterday — and several court rulings and statements by Hawai'i's Republican governor, Linda Lingle, the issue continued to resonate from Capitol Hill to the blogosphere.
…
Mainland media has also continued to focus attention on the birthers. CNN's Lou Dobbs last week demanded Obama's original birth certificate. That was followed by CNN/U.S. President Jon Klein telling staffers of “Lou Dobbs Tonight” that the issue is a “dead” story, according to a Los Angeles Times report.
In an e-mail, according to the Times, Klein wrote that CNN researchers had determined that Obama's 1961 birth certificate no longer exists because Hawai'i officials had discarded paper documents in 2001 — a claim denied yesterday by Isle health officials.
In 2001, Hawai'i's paper documents were reproduced in electronic format but “any paper data prior to that still exists,” Health Department spokeswoman Okubo said.
Okubo would not say where Obama's original birth certificate is, but said “we have backups for all of our backups.”
“Our Certificate of Live Birth is the standard form, which was modeled after national standards that are acceptable by federal agencies and organizations,” Okubo said. “With that form, you can get your passport or your soccer registration or your driver's license.”"
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090…
_____________________
Ok, so that's the long-form question answered. That was easy. And it totally resolved your question, as well as the birther argument in general. I must have posted that very same link a dozen times trying to be helpful to you birthers who apparently cannot use Google or read a newspaper or look at a television screen.
But this only took me 20 seconds total. Why don't you people just do that for yourselves? Oh yeah, I forgot. You're racist conspiracy theorists. You don't care what the truth is. Your job is to ignore the truth and keep this thing going by saying everything else is part of the conspiracy or untrustworthy. I keep forgetting that.
And some of you are apparently too stupid to tell that jimpa is not the same person as me. Wow, now I've taken on duplicating powers!
Pete, Ken, Jim, JJ, I think this one is going to give d2i a run for his money… Stay tuned to the cartoon network that is The Washington Independent to find out….
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:08 pm
You’re still dramatizing everything. Yet another sign that you have no argument.
You have utterly no basis on which to assert that I despise my friends or neighbors, or anything about subordination to government power. You just make shit up because you’re paranoid and stupid.
Good luck with that. My President is still your President, fuckwit.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:12 pm
Yeah, yeah, the first thing we do let’s kill all the lawyers. Read that before from you, test-taker.
Let’s see the proof for any of your absurdity. Oh right, you don’t need any.
Tentative, reasonable conclusions and all.
Okubo didn’t violate state law by SAYING she saw the records. Post the law or stop making shit up. She could only violate the law by RELEASING the records. Which is what you birthers want her to do.
As usual, you’re full of shit. Surprise, surprise.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:28 am
The first time, I was gonna let it go.
In your earlier post, where you took up randypuppy's question about the long form birth certificate, you wrote:
“Your wasting your time, both cnhaynes & stephenperry-jimpa have no answer.”
I figured it was a typo and I was feeling charitable, plus I was laughing to myself about how you think I'm jimpa.
But now you did it again. “Your a dumbf_cking idiotic…”
You really don't know that “your” is a possessive pronoun, and the word you want is a contraction of “you” and “are,” as follows: “you're.”
I'm no longer interested, Joker, in why you think I'm idiotic. I want to know about your schooling. Where do you come from? Is it somewhere in America? Where did you learn critical thinking skills? Days of Our Lives? As the World Turns? Help me out here.
I would be rather curious to know, if you think I somehow suck the life out of any attempt at a civil discussion, why did you not scold Randwulf, who fantasized about killing his unspecified readers after calling the lot of them “morons,” “freaks,” and “stupid, cowardly, twisted fucks” who could “fuck off and die” if they disagreed with his non-functional links to nonexistent arguments about a nonsensical conspiracy theory that is premised on racial bigotry.
More than rather curious, Joker. I'm not going to take ANYthing you write seriously, and I doubt that neither will anyone else, until you address that rather glaring discrepancy.
Whatever you may think of having your nose rubbed in your own stupidity, I do not insult at random. I do not refer to unknown potential readers of any of my posts as morons or freaks. I do not threaten death for those who disagree with me. And I don't completely fucking lose it right there before your eyes.
Do you really think anyone can have a civil discussion with Randwulf? I would seriously like to know. He was like that before I got here. I didn't make him say, for example, any of the following, which he posted before I ever knew this site existed:
“Wow. Well, I may have to re-think my earlier assertion that I am (or was) a “good American”. After reading all of this drivel today, I am totally convinced that it's all a lost cause. What a bunch of TV inspired SMARTA$$ES. American is done. At least 52% doomed. The monkey majority is now running the zoo. What made the US a great nation is gone. What has always been it's main weakness now is a dominant force. You're all (or at least 52%) brain-washed main-stream-media zombies. All you can see is your stupid little Demican/Republicrat world. You are all (DEMS and REPUBS) controlled by forces you can't see and don't understand. Just a bunch of stupid Goyim. You really don't deserve a country any more. Go ahead. Self destruct. Whatever. There's no way to fix it. You're fat. You're stupid. You're ugly. You're misbegotten and badly bred. You have no morals. You have no courage. You have no work ethic. Your kids can't read. And if they could, they'd read garbage. They don't know math. They don't know science. They know no real history. They only know how to dress like “gangsta” and talk jive. They are filled with “political correctness” though. Great. Fine. The end.
Rome took a couple of centuries to go from a world super power to a decadent, powerless, mish-mash shithole. We (or you rather) will accomplish the same feat in a couple of decades. I secede. I don't want anything to do with you mongrel, perverts. Just keep printing up that funny money and throwing it around like idiots. More national debt will only hasten the decline. You all deserve the lying, crooked and evil government you have allowed to be created here. And now you can just sink into the $hit with it. If you listen very closely, you can hear the Gods, and the rest of the world laughing. Disgusting monkeys.” –randypuppy the erotic primate, 2 weeks ago
If civil discussion is what you're after, you have a strange conception of civil discussion. I addressed your long form question and posed some earnest questions to you. What is your response?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:30 pm
“An order issued by a court of law directing the provision of such archival information does not violate due process, does it, counselor?”
Of course it does. Have you not read our Constitution? Skip down to the Tenth Amendment.
Now then, you take that out of there and you’ll be one step closer to your goal.
We’re waiting…
Meantime, tell us why there have been 40 birther suits but no Judge has ever done anything like try to issue an order compelling Hawai’i to disregard its own law so that evidence beyond a perfectly serviceable and authenticated COLB, which, of course, is prima facie evidence, should be required.
I will give you a hint. It has to do with that Tenth Amendment thingie.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:34 am
Oooh, this must be that civil discussion you were chiding me about in your last post!
Before I lick my way out of a shit hole, whether it's mine or anyone else's, I'd like to get a peek at the Constitutional Law you're referring to. Because my copy of the Constitution has a Tenth Amendment in it. Does yours?
If yours does too, then where do you get the crazy idea that Hawai'i cannot make its own birth certificate laws and its own recordkeeping and retention policies? Can you quote me the text of your Tenth Amendment so we can be sure we're talking apples to apples here?
Thanks, Joker.
Now, then, back to that shit hole for you!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:38 pm
Nothing would shut you up.
He has posted his birth certificate online. That’s it. Period. End of story. IF you were sincere. But you’re not.
It’s okay though. The rest of the world, even the right-wing world, knows you’re full of it. Check out the editors of the National Review Online, from a week ago:
“The fundamental fiction is that Obama has refused to release his “real” birth certificate. This is untrue. The document that Obama has made available is the document that Hawaiian authorities issue when they are asked for a birth certificate. There is no secondary document cloaked in darkness, only the state records that are used to generate birth certificates when they are requested.
If one applies for a United States passport, the passport office will demand a birth certificate. It defines this as an official document bearing “your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records.” The Hawaiian birth certificate President Obama has produced—the document is formally known as a “certificate of live birth”—bears that information. It has been inspected by reporters, and several state officials have confirmed that the information in permanent state records is identical to that on the president’s birth certificate—which is precisely what one expects, of course, since the state records are used to generate those documents when they are requested. In other words, what President Obama has produced is the “real” birth certificate of myth and lore.”
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTRjMTFhMzQxYmEzNjA2YWIwOTU4YWVjNzRmODE2NTI=
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
I posted a link and a quote that refutes YOUR unsupported lie. My link is to a right-wing website, the National Review Online. You claim that I define a valid source as anyone that agrees with me. What’s your evidence on that? I NEVER agree with the NRO. But I cited them.
And I cited World Net Daily in many posts, because on Aug. 23, 2008, they published an article confirming the COLB is authentic.
And all you can come up with is that I’m a troll trying to stifle debate?
Jesus, and another one of you who thinks that anyone who disagrees with you must be paid by the President?
Where do you people come from? Did Pat Buchanan just dial 1-800-BIRTHER and order up a few dozen of you?
You’re silly. You’re trying to tell me I’m “low down the chain.” What does that make you? You’re posting absurd conspiracy theory lies on an obscure liberal newspaper comment section. And being raked over the coals for lying.
I like the part where you have some sort of argument or evidence to show that the President is not eligible.
It’s just sort of hard to find, tucked into your paranoid rant the way it is.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:05 am
That's the spirit! Don't quit just because your movement is a joke and its leader is the punchline.
Stay in there until Orly Taitz is revealed as Rahm Emanuel in a wig and crazy makeup.
Don't quit even then. Obama is a shape-shifting alien who stopped time and robbed us all of our Americanity. So get that message out. Don't settle for Twitter. Face time is real time.
Don't pull a Palin. Don't quit. Do what President Barack Obama did in his 18 month Presidential campaign and just keep pushing, just keep slogging, just keep walking, just keep talking, just keep smiling, and just keep going.
You will reach your goal. Well, you will reach your goal provided that your goal is to get President Obama re-elected.
Oh, and I forgot to tell you…
That bit you wrote about Obama's mom having unprotected uncircumsized sex with two third-world country men so it's no surprise about her dying of ovarian cancer?
You stay classy, big guy!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:06 pm
So… Let’s see.
You posted absurd lies, including one about Clinton involvement with Annenberg’s factcheck.org.
Off the top of my head, I refuted your lies with the actual truth.
You somehow take this as an indication that I am dead wrong (about something just not sure what) and that I don’t have a day job.
PontiusPilate, you’re an odd duck.
Most people who post nonsense don’t have the wit to claim the nonsense was all part of their clever strategy.
So you get points for that, at least.
Ok, makes sense. Carry on.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:21 pm
As for the colorful language, do what you have to do. We need someone to do what it takes arounds the boards. Just don’t get into foul trouble.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
Wow. I don’t remember being laughed out of law school.
That sounds like something I would remember.
Your evidence that I AM a paid shill for Obama, never mind your evidence that I didn’t go to law school, is WHAT, exactly?
And is that a flatulence joke? Gawd, you’re funny! You must be the hit of your elementary school at lunchtime.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:36 pm
yes, you would like us all to shut up wouldn’t you troll … but unfortunately for you this is still a free country (just).
You quote this source as though it is written by God. People are disputing the document he tried to pass off as a birth certificate. That is kinda the issue here dude! Der.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:37 pm
Ah that’s what I needed to hear.
I’ll stay out of foul trouble. Maybe a technical but not two. I know the rules.
So, what’s your take? Am I a “Zionist,” like Golem is mindlessly chanting that I am?
LOL
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:41 pm
Who cares about left-wing right-wing these days? They are the same thing.
Anyway, when he shows his birth certificate, or the Berg case is settled, then I guess the issue will go away.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:43 pm
Oh, so ALL “birthers” are dumb. And this kind of statement is evidence that you are not a troll?
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:55 pm
I wasn’t seeking to provide evidence that I’m not a troll. I’m not a troll. You’re stupid if you think I am. But at least you’re not alone. Many of you birthers seem to think anyone who disagrees with you is a paid Obama blogger. It was flattering until I realized you just say that to everyone. I wanted to be special…
But, seriously, if you want to get down to it, I thought you were joking about the reference to Phil Berg. That’s why I wrote that this had to be parody.
If you were SERIOUSLY positing that Orly Taitz is a “false flag” and that Israel is somehow involved, and that the goal is to discredit Phil Berg, a man who not only already had his suit rejected by every court up to and including the SCOTUS…
but is also a 9/11 Truther….
then, yes. I AM indicating that YOU are dumb. I have already gone on record as to the stupidity of birthers in general.
You, however, are the first one I’ve encountered who made the “let’s save Phil Berg from a credibility attack” argument. Even other birthers don’t think Phil Berg is credible. He’s just willing to say anything to make a buck.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:08 am
Way down below, stephenperry wrote, in response to a message of mine days and days old:
“LOL. Good one.
“Especially the frauds part. Given that we're on a thread below an article about the forged Kenyan birf sirtifikat.
“I like how you keep trying to write (“say” in test-taker logic) that you're merely calling the question, when in fact you're just making up bullshit and putting it in bold font.
“You slither from shadow to shadow.
“You have no answer for ANY evidence except to posit, as though it means a fucking thing, that the COLB online is not the same thing as holding the piece of paper in your hands and weeping over the fact that it says what you fucking well know it says.
“You cannot address why all those right-wing credible and non-credible publications and credible right wing journalists have gone on record indicating the birther conspiracy theory is just flat out refusal to accept the results of a legitimate election.
“You cannot address why Republican governed state officials would lie to protect a new Democratic President.
“All you can do is throw up your hands and insult everyone with absurd overuse and misuse of the term 'Socialist.'
“You have no recourse except to post multiple fantasies about how great it would be if your dream of Obama getting forcibly raped in prison came true.
“You have no proof and you have no intention of looking for any. You keep ignoring actual law, all while calling yourself a Constitutionalist.
“it's just so fucking stupid I don't even know why I bother.
“Oh yeah, because I loathe you and want to keep reminding you of how stupid you are.
'You ignore the law and pretend that it, and lawyers, are somehow inapplicable to the 'common man' and the court of 'public opinion.'
“You continue to run from the words 'burden of proof' like randypuppy runs from his mother when his panties get soiled.
“You can make up nonsense all you want.
“Doesn't change the fact that you are a disturbed conspiracy theorist with no scruples, no logical reasoning skills, and no sense of when you're being exposed over and over again as an utter fool.
“I never tire of reading the posts of other people who tell you that you're the craziest birther here.
“Keep pissing into the wind, wretch. I want to 'hear' it. Dumb fuck.
“I haven't seen proof that you're a doctor. What are YOU hiding, you slimy sonofabitch?”
Ooh, ranting on and on, little stevie. They still covering you with oral haloperidol? The injectables haven't kicked in yet, have they?
Last things first, I suppose. Have I sought proof that you're a lawyer? Or that your black? Or that you're handicapped? Or that your sex change operation isn't completed yet? None of these! I have accepted you for the full-blown psychotic you truly are, and valued that, and given you every benefit of the doubt. Tsk.
Anything of any substance otherwise – not that your doubts of my profession are of substance, but, hey – in your ravings, little stevie?
Nope. Just more unattached, enraged, disconnected, illogical and worthless spew. Par for that twisted golf course laid out in the festering recesses of little stevie's… Well, let's call it a “mind,” shall we?
You just settle down, little stevie. Dream of sucking your Messiah's big, half-white schlong, and taste the semen in your sleep….
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:14 pm
Anybody who has links to Israel has to be viewed with suspicion, given the history. E.g. see “911 Missing Links”. Doesn’t mean they are all bad, e.g. there are some honest Israelis who fight for truth and justice … but in general the fact that she is in Israel rings alarm bells for me. Israelis on the whole cannot be trusted, nor can dual US-Israeli citizens.
Phil Berg is a great patriot, I wish him luck in his search for truth and justice … so should you. His case should be heard.
Why are you so against the idea of Obama just showing the real, actual, birth certificate?
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:20 pm
Der!
You can keep calling me dude. It adds to your credibility.
I don’t quote that source as though it is written by God. It is written by right-wingers who HATE Obama.
If THEY say this birther thing is crap, which they do, and you can see it for yourself, little one, you cannot say it is because they are in Obama’s pocket or they are liberal weenies.
If you have some evidence upon which you are “disputing the document he tried to pass off as a birth certificate,” let’s see it.
Because telling me that the COLB is not a birth certificate, when I showed you the link to the aforementioned right-wing website directly contradicting you, isn’t persuasive.
In fact it makes you look….well, I hate to overuse the word, but it fits… it makes you look stupid.
But, NO, I do not want you to shut up. YOU are the one who wrote “that would shut us all up.”
Florida Christian alert! “This could all be laid to rest so easily!”
I want you to record your views and put them on YouTube. I would tell you to go visit your local GOP representative and hound him or her about this incessantly. But you’re not from here. So we’ll just have to stick with the internet for you.
Calling me a troll is amusing. Your lack of critical thinking skills is what prevents you from understanding that not everyone who disagrees with you is paid by the President of the United States.
Like I told you, you’re stupid. It’s ok if you don’t get any of this.
I’ll still be here to correct you and tell you that you’re stupid.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:22 am
Days and days is a funny way of saying “a few hours.” But then again, I never indicated that your use of English was particularly precise.
So, anything new in your post? Let's whip it out… Not my cock, you closet fag.. My test-taker Checklist!
Let's see…
random obscure medical terminology apropos of nothing….check.
sexual reference directed to me….check.
mocking the handicapped….check.
projecting your “full-blown psychotic” nonsense onto others….check.
oral sex reference concerning Obama….check.
content, substance, logic, reason, fact, evidence, a point, something funny….nope, not here.
It all checks out. It's a genuine test-taker post. No need to show me your short form, wretch.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:27 pm
“Anybody who has links to Israel has to be viewed with suspicion, given the history. Israelis on the whole cannot be trusted, nor can dual US-Israeli citizens.”
You are absurd. You cannot tell me that Israelis cannot be trusted and expect to be taken seriously.
I’m not against the idea of Obama showing his actual birth certificate. He posted it online a year ago, stupid. I’m not saying you can’t go to factcheck.org and look at it until your heart breaks.
As to the original birth certificate, news flash, little one…I am not the one keeping it from you! The Constitution of the United States is the one you have a beef with. Go tell it. Focus on the Tenth Amendment.
Then go tell Janice Okubo to get her boss, Republican Governor Linda Lingle, to come to your house and apologize for telling the world that Obama’s original vital records say what the COLB says.
Why are you so fixated on seeing more evidence when you apparently contend (without evidence) that the COLB is fake?
Me: “Here’s my birth certificate. It got me a passport and driver’s license.”
You: “That’s fake. Show me the real one.”
Me: “Here’s the Original Birth Certificate.”
You: “It’s fake.”
Me: “What the hell makes you say that?”
You: “Israelis cannot be trusted.”
Me: “But I’m not Israeli by any stretch!”
You: “Show me your birth certificate.”
Silly. I won’t even get to the “great patriot,” Phil Berg.
Did you come here from TownHall or RedState or something? You have to be a special kind of stupid to express wacky anti-Semitism on a LIBERAL newspaper comment board. Doofus.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:29 pm
Look, dude. I don’t have time to look at evidence and crazy stuff like that so stop posting links, I just got a set of mantras to repeat. I don’t even think you should be restricted from being president on the basis of “Natural Born”. If we got rid of that restriction then this wouldn’t matter.
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:34 pm
LMAO @ you not having time to look at evidence.
Birther hall of fame answer.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:35 pm
It is not anti-semitic to distrust Israelis. You will find that many semites, including some Jewish semites, distrust Israelis. Doofus.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:38 am
Got it on emal, stevie, but couldn't find it on the Web page, even after going back and back and back. Sometimes the emails come through and the Web posts don't go up. Trying to be polite and responsive.
Okay, paranoid imagining that he's being lied to. Again. Never seems to be capable of appreciating how people can make simple mistakes. Tsk. Roll call through all his fixations and phobias, lack of substance, evasion, thought-blocking. Fine.
Thanks, stevie. Been there, done that. No significant change in any axis, but I really think they can jack up your maintenance fluphenazine dosing. Gotta have something to keep you from screaming all through the night like this. Gotta be disturbing the other inmates, right?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:43 pm
This is how we roll in the conspiracy camp. There are so many issues that we can’t look at any of the evidence, there just is not enough time between getting the word out to the grass roots.
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:58 pm
When you find yourself in a hole, anti-Semite, just keep digging, okay?
And don’t forget my request to put your thoughts on a Youtube video.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:01 pm
The Berg case? That was thrown out by the Supreme Court.
How do you think this works? The court throws out your case so then you can “settle” with the other side?
Berg doesn’t have a case now. You do know that, right? Well, he is involved in a lawsuit against people who used to be aligned with him on the birther issue. I should be more specific. He no longer has a pending case against Obama.
LMAO. You’re a breath of fresh air, anti-Semite!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:05 am
Try again.
You wrote it two and a half hours ago.
You are now claiming that you couldn't find it. It is on the second page of this website, and you can always look at ALL of your own comments just by clicking your own name.
Lies within lies. Dumb fucking birther.
Is it also the case that you cannot remember what you said two hours ago, and instead it seems like it was “days and days ago?”
Oh for fuck's sake. I get no joy out of mocking you if you're really going to be this stupid. Are you indicating that your memory is fading?
You talk about people making simple mistakes. No. Compassion isn't coming your way, conspiracy theorist. You see fault and fraud in every government or journalistic action. You insult everyone with vile racist, sexist, obscene slurs.
Never mind. If you cannot remember what you said two hours ago, then I want to make sure you can remember what I tell you.
Go spend time with your grandkids. Drive them around. Run red lights. But above all, spend time with them.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:06 pm
Look I know you’re jealous. It’s okay. I don’t mind.
I never indicated I own the thread. I’m certain that I have friends here. You’ve posted clueless ignorant nonsense as I communicated with some of them (Mac users’ forum? Seriously, Joker?).
If you don’t like it, I bet you know what I’m going to tell you to do, don’t you? That’s right. Tell me how much you don’t like it. It’s fun to watch you struggle to be taken seriously.
Look at the bottom right side of the end of the post you’re responding to. See that? “1 person liked this comment.”
Ok, so let’s go through this again… Your point is what?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
Wow. Someone’s got a stephenperry fixation.
If you’re so bothered, why did you “follow” my comments on Disqus?
You would be creepy if you weren’t so juvenile.
Your jealousy and intimidation are not my concern. If you think I’m a potty mouth ranter, I still don’t see what that has to do with anything. Just don’t read my posts, or…here’s a laugh…try to post something, ANYTHING, that actually expresses your own opinion about the birther controversy.
I promise I won’t use any profanity, or as you so eloquently put it, “potty mouth.”
Joker, “your” already the daily reading joke. I think there must be something in birther DNA that prevents them from knowing that “your” is a possessive pronoun and not a contraction of “you” and “are.”
“Your” easily the tenth birther to do that in the last 24 hours. No non-birthers do that though. Wonder why not?
Before you go, did you notice that someone “liked this comment” that you’re bitching about having read? I notice that you have 4 points. I have 242 as of this moment.
So, really, keep your jealousy to yourself or you’ll just keep getting embarrassed. It’s really up to you, Joker. I don’t set out to write to you; you keep giving me your inane jealous opinion.
Silly goose.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:22 am
Nah. I couldn't find your post, little stevie. And you gave no real indication of what had been in mine to which you were supposedly replaying. Can you possibly get a grip, you bugnuts little pouch of paranoia? Sheesh.
Let's see; attempts at insult, empty bullshit, more about my grandkids and how much you hate 'em, yadda, yadda, yadda…
Little stevie, did they cut off your Ativan? Is that what's got you frothing like this? For want of a bit of benzodiazepime….
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:24 pm
James, I can go you one better.
Here’s WND, on August 23, 2008, confirming that the COLB is authentic!
Read that again. Or just read their own words:
“A separate WND investigation into Obama’s certification of live birth utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren’t originally there.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214
So even WND knows the COLB is authentic. They just need to make money by drawing eyeballs to their site.
TEWS_Pilot won’t ever admit to being wrong. He will just say he was trying to fool you into defending Obama.
I never said TEWS_Pilot was bright.
I just proved that he’s full of it by using his own beloved WND though.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:24 am
“That bit you wrote about Obama's mom having unprotected uncircumsized sex with two third-world country men so it's no surprise about her dying of ovarian cancer?”
Red that is all I ever need to know about you. Let your wife raise the kids.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:28 pm
Psst! Don’t look now, goober, but I posted the WND link and quote for James that shows that even your beloved WND knows the COLB is authentic…
“A separate WND investigation into Obama’s certification of live birth utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren’t originally there.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214
How does this fit into your revisionist history that you’re not actually a dumbass but instead were just playing with us all along?
jimpa asked you for the code so we’ll know when you’re not serious.
jim is more polite than I am. You didn’t fool me. You’re just stupid and wrong. Clintons – factcheck; WND. My god.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:28 am
“Do you have proof that she {Taitz} is Israeli (rather than merely Jewish), let alone that she works for Mossad?”
Because he doesn't have any proof is what makes this believable to a birther. The Mossad would cover their tracks. And on and on it goes.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:38 am
I don't hate your grandkids. Never said that. You're full of it, especially so today.
I have no opinion about your grandkids. Don't know whether they exist. I hope they do. And I hope YOU love them. And that you feel close to them.
And that they get cancer before you kill them in an auto accident that is your fault.
I don't know how you got that confused with my personal opinion about them.
Personally I think they crapped out in the Grampa Lottery. Other than that they're just tools to me. I hope that you can somehow feel even worse than you already do, that's all.
Apologies if that was at all unclear, wretch.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:43 pm
Nope. That’s an insult, not a request.
As usual, your obsession with me and every word I type does not assist you at ALL in reading comprehension.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:48 pm
And why should he release them? To satisfy his fringe racist critics? Keep trying. Gotta come up with something better than that, Joker.
:D
You’re pretty juvenile, especially for someone who tried to chastize me and act like Grown Up Somber Debater. Doofus.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:52 pm
To borrow your line, “is that the best you can do?”
Seriously, you write the lamest things. You always try to snark a one-liner in at the end of a post that isn’t about you. And it always sucks.
Get some help. Even randypuppy is better at this than you are.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:53 am
Crap. I was hoping he wasn't a birther, but rather just some drunk who wandered in here.
Or, to use one of your lines,
“I was here for the real estate course. Am I in the wrong place?”
I kind of doubted the sincerity based on the word “speel” in the phrase “speel the American blood.” Seemed like someone trying too hard to impersonate a foreigner.
But I'm not really wired to let it go when people say racist or otherwise offensive things without any shred of evidence, and one thing that is demonstrably false is that Israel lacks guts. You can say they use a sledgehammer where a flyswatter is called for, but you can't say they're afraid.
So I had to throw in my two cents. If he's a birther I'm sure he'll be back. Otherwise, maybe just a thing that went “bump” in the night.
If you're here, then either you're up early or I'm up late. I just got stuck in a merry-go-round with the test-taker, trying to work my way back to whatever I may have missed since yesterday, and lost track of time. I'd better hit the hay. Enjoy reading the paranoia and foolishness expressed by Private Joker darbot, who thinks I'm you and you're me and we both get paid by Obama.
What the hell? Do these people never encounter anyone who disagrees with them? I don't live in a world that paranoid. My world is one where I'm stuck making my own peanut butter sandwiches and waiting for Salma to show up.
See you around the threads…
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:57 pm
Hey, “I prefer to be called Douglas.”
Just one thing before you go. I notice you don’t have any evidence of any accusation you make. That’s okay.
That’s not what I wanted to tell you.
I wanted to tell you that the stick up your ass has a stick up its ass, and I wanted to remind you not to take long strides as you walk away, or they both might break.
I didn’t reject truth and fairness. Tell that gibberish to the birthers, doofus. Nor have I mindlessly embraced Obama. I voted for Hillary. I just love my country and respect the uniform, especially that of Commander in Chief Barack Hussein Obama.
This bothers you. I know. I just don’t give a shit.
Enjoy your prim and proper delusional world.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:08 am
“Say stephenperry-jimpa do you get paid twice for shilling for Obama?”
darpot – Stephen (nor I) works for President Obama. If you look at Stephen's posts and usage of “bad” words is the proof. Any organization would pull the plug on someone going off message like that.
You referenced we are the same person, again look at our posts. That should answer that question.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:25 am
Without reading this battle from the very beginning its not possible to know which sides old Stevie and Tuci are on! There's obviously a lot more to this issue than meets the eye. Of course it's only reasonable that Barry's records are open to scrutiny; that's all this is about really, but it seems like here the sides are getting swopped around. If what Orly Taitz has done is really an Israeli stunt; as it might appear to be, we end up having then sympathy with Barry (whatever that means) against our very reason and our own interests! Maybe its all just a double cross on a double cross because Barry's not keen on letting Israel have the entire Temple Mount so they can knock down the Dome and build the Temple. But maybe that's all just BS too!? Best thing to avoid all this is for Barry to allow scrutiny of his records; I mean that's why the rule exists – to precisely avoid complicated divided-loyalty potentially catastrophic situations like this to develop.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:26 am
“Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest all of the questions.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI…
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:30 am
Tsk. More rant and ramble. He hopes my grandchildren die – cancer, MVA, whatever – and then he backpeddles with “I don't hate your grandkids.” Et-yadda-yadda-cetera.
Bullshit fake question about how and why I think and write as I do when I've made all that quite clear from the beginning, and consistently to the present. I'm a moral and methodological individualist, dedicated to the defense of individual rights, fully appreciative of the proclivity for those attaining to government power to abuse that power in the violation of citizens' rights, and therefore jealous – as the Founders were jealous – of unchained, unconstitutional excesses on the parts of those public servants who fancy themselves our civil masters.
This is at odds with little stevie's bugnuts paranoid socialist vision of America as Utopia (“Utopia is not an option”), and therefore he hates me. I'm laissez-faire, stevie is “Believe! Obey! Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!”
And he thinks that wanting to drag down a socialist who is by all indications occupying the highest elective office in the land by dint of criminal machination is “racist” merely because the man is about one-quarter Luo tribesman.
Tsk. Poor little stevie.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:30 am
No, he's not spending hundreds of thousands of dollars… I wish you birthers would stop making shit up.
Read the source of that made-up figure:
“The White House is, presently, ignoring the birth certificate questions, having released an official copy of the Hawaii certificate during the presidential campaign. The press aide once tasked with quashing viral rumors, Ben LaBolt, no longer follows the fringe. But lawyers for the Democratic National Committee and for Obama have been steadily batting down a stream of lawsuits, winning motions to dismiss the suits in courts from Pennsylvania to Hawaii, from the state level to the United States Supreme Court.
To believers, the legal engagement itself is evidence that something's afoot.
“[Obama] is spending hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars to keep this information from getting out,” said Gary Kreep, the lawyer representing former presidential candidate Alan Keyes, who sued Obama in California to prevent the state from certifying its election results.
Keyes recently called the citizenship issue “the greatest crisis this nation has ever seen” and warned of “chaos, confusion and civil war.”
Kreep has been battling Obama's California lawyer, Fredric Woocher, to release the president's records from Occidental College on the theory that they might provide information about his citizenship.
Woocher has threatened to seek sanctions against Kreep for pursuing the case.
“This suit, like all of the others that have been filed challenging Obama's qualifications for the Presidency, is frivolous,” he said in an email to POLITICO, adding that he is, in fact, working pro bono. “There is absolutely no truth to the stories about the untold millions supposedly being paid to us,” he said.”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19450…
Got that? “There is absolutely no truth the stories about the untold millions supposedly being paid to us.”
Just like there's no truth to the birther nonsense.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:42 am
Golem, you don't need to read much at all of the “battle” to know that Tuci test-taker is a birther and I am not. The rest of it is neither here nor there.
It is not “reasonable” that the President's records be open to scrutiny. Where do you get that idea? What records? By whom? For what purpose?
You indicate, without explanation, “that's why the rule exists.” What rule? What are you even talking about? Are you just here to stir up nonsense, like franknowzad? This has all been sorted out over and over. It's a conspiracy theory. Are you daft?
You may have a different understanding in the U.K. You don't have a Constitution. We do. There are privacy rights enshrined in that document, and there are fundamental legal privileges and rules of civil procedure.
All that is way too complex for what is in fact a simple issue.
1. No other Presidential candidate, much less sitting President, has ever been so much as ASKED to show a birth certificate.
2. Obama posted his birth certificate, called, as we know, a Certification of Live Birth, online a year ago.
3. The birth certificate is officially recognized by the government of Hawai'i and authenticated by its Governor, who happens to be Republican, and the Dept. of Health officials who are charged with maintaining such records.
4. Birthers refuse to acknowledge that the rule of law provides a clear roadmap. They have no evidence, no standing to present any evidence if they had any, and no means of refuting the evidence that Obama posted online a year ago.
5. Birthers know this. That is why they clamor for his kindergarten records. They just want to find some way to disqualify or discredit him. It is not about Constitutional eligibility. It is about him being black.
And here you come with your double cross on a double cross…. Jesus. What is it with you people? Now we have to get birthers from the U.K., or writing as though that is where they are from, as well?
Can you all seriously just not accept reality? You LOST the election. There's no massive conspiracy to shove someone down your throat that is illegitimate. What is wrong with you birthers? You are pathetic and disingenuous. Anti-American hypocrites. This is why I feel no remorse at mocking you.
Potentially catastrophic my ass. It's 8 percent of the country, bitching and moaning about what 58 percent of the country is tickled pink about. Deal with it.
Or don't. Either way, the reality is that President Obama is the President.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:51 am
I don't hate your grandkids. You're stupid.
I feel neither hatred nor anything else about them. I told you that. You choose to ignore it like you ignore everything else.
You're not a moral ANYTHING.
I'm not a Socialist. You're stupid for saying that. You cannot point to ONE socialist thing I have written or implied in any post.
You're just a fucking idiot.
“by all indications?” Please. Just give us ONE fucking indication that Obama did ANYTHING “by dint of criminal machination.”
You won't. Because he hasn't. You lying sack of shit hiding behind an absurd misapprehension of “rights.”
You'll just put your usual sexual bullshit in with your usual prison sex bullshit and your usual socialism bullshit and your usual medical mumbo-jumbo bullshit and your usual obscure fucking quotes about shit no one cares about bullshit.
Go on being a fucking jackass. We know it is what you need to do to deal with your racism and paranoia. Jesus, you project paranoia onto ME? I'm not the one who sees Socialism around every corner, you fucking loser.
You can't even tell the truth when it comes to your fucking GRANDCHILDREN. Think about that. You're worthless.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:57 am
Or, maybe, Obama is crafty enough to know that no one would suspect someone so profane of being part of his carefully-controlled political machine….
The plot thickens.
But I will try to ease up on the bad words. It's really not like me. I just get fed up with having to post the same links to the same obvious truths over and over to people who are disingenuous and racist.
“I can't promise that I'll try. But I'll try to try.” –Bart Simpson
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:58 am
Oh, stevie, but what other emotion do you have but hatred? Hatred of children, hatred of your neighbors, hatred of those who confront you with your own hatefulness, hatred of those who catch you in the massive lies you're trying to peddle on behalf of your criminal Mombasa Messiah…
You are a living hymn of malice, little lawyer, frantic in your loathing of the good merely because it is good, and thereby contrasts with the horrors to which you have pledged your perverted allegiance, the reverse racism of your own sense of inferiority, your stupid defensive paranoia about your own race – as if that insignificance mattered, or ever could matter, anywhere but in the minds of bigots not worthy of consideration.
What a sorry, sad little sack of shit you are, stevie.
Trying to feel better by dedicating your life to a much greater sack of shit in Washington City.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:03 pm
Nope. The only person in the whole world I hate is you.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:09 pm
This has absolutely nothing to do with Barry being black (or even part black). If his mom and pop were both black and say from Alabama this question could not arise. The question arises because he has moved around the world on different passports, under different names, and under different religions. I think we have some reasonable right to know where exactly the truth lies here.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:10 pm
I'm on the side of constitutional government, explicitly in this case including enforcement of the provisions of Article II, Section 1. Little stevie is dedicated to playing Fancy Lawyer Tricks to give his “poverty pimp” Mombasa Messiah online “cover” to evade the reach of public opinion demanding that Barry Soetoro cough up the physical, print-on-paper, duly signed and sealed legal documentary proof that he has been born in Honolulu and is therefore qualified as a “natural born citizen” under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to have run for (much less occupy) the office of President of these United States.
Barry has thus far not submitted his physical certified and true COLB or any other similar legal document as supporting evidence of his contention that he is a “natural born citizen,” and has expended something in the vicinity of a million dollars in legal fees to quash more than forty legal cases all over the country – on procedural rather than substantive grounds – demanding disgorgement either from Mr. Soetoro or from the archives of the government of the state of Hawaii those certified and true documentary manifestations of Barry's vital statistics.
This is a straightforward requirement commonly placed upon millions of Americans when taking so much as the routine steps required to renew a driver's license in many states. But stevie's position is that no private citizen may dare press upon stevie's beloved President any such demand, for his beloved Barry is privileged above all others, and immune, and Fancy Lawyer Tricks nullify any possible law by which the Messiah might be obliged to cough up his friggin' birth certificate.
Little stevie is also a socialist, but wants to define socialism as exclusively the sort of “death camp” Bolshevism of the old Soviet Empire, and thinks a “mixed economy” – where the government screws with the marketplace to “pick winners” according to stevie's progressive brand of politics – isn't socialistic in its character, malignancy, and deleterious effects. In other words, little stevie wants to lie about socialism, and have it, too.
That pretty much got it? Yeah, seems so. Also, stevie is a lawyer, and lies for a living. I'm a primary care “gatekeeper” physician, and I get perfect strangers coming to my office, I tell 'em “Take your clothes off, put on the paper gown, and sit on the exam table.”
And they do it, and then I get paid for it. What could be better?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:14 pm
He was born in Hawai'i. The question therefore does not arise.
Unless you're a racist.
Where, exactly, am I losing you here?
You don't have any evidence of “different passports,” for example. Why bother trying to couch your nonsense in reasonable terms when you just make shit up halfway through?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:19 pm
Oh, but it has everything to do with Barry “being black.” Or kinda black. Or a little bit Luo, half white, and a big chunk Arab.
Or, really, about as black as Pat Boone.
But you understand, don't you? The illusion, that's what counts. This is all race identity politics, and Barry has chosen to be “black.” It's a political advantage for him, y'know?
And you're being reasonable about Barry's family and its gadabout ways. Little stevie's gonna just hate for being reasonable. Oh, look!
He already does.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:20 pm
There is no need to be abusive. It is obvious that you have a special interest in this issue which is more important than us getting to know the facts to our own (not necessarily your) satisfaction.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:21 pm
You don't know what I think about Socialism, and you don't even know what Socialism is.
You have less than no idea what I think about a “mixed economy.” All you have to go on is that I think you're fucking stupid. I didn't purport to discuss economic philosophy with you.
I'm rather fixated, as you have noted, on the President's eligibility for office — namely, I want to unearth the reality behind the birthers' pretext. I also want to provide analysis and evidence to those who legitimately request it, so that the campaign of disinformation birthers run as their stock in trade will be that much less successful.
You, on the other hand, have this apparent need to distort what people say or think or MAY think until it fits your deranged worldview. We're not facing the Apocalypse and no one is coming to steal your property and give it to inner-city youth. Jesus fuck, you're five kinds of stupid.
Go back to whining about the birth certificate, where at least you're on familiar ground.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:31 pm
Nah, you've made it perfectly clear, little lawyer. You're in favor of “progressive politicians,” and “progressive” perfectly understandable as code-talk for “socialist.” Government officials fucking with the marketplace to force people at gunpoint (or threat of gunpoint) to do things they wouldn't otherwise do “for the good of the public.”
In other words, picking winners and loosers in the marketplace according to political and not economic purposes, violating people's rights through arm-twisting and “favors” and sweetheart deals and no-bid contracts – y'know, socialism. Or its Republican equivalent, mercantilism. But you're not a mercantilist, are you, stevie?
No, you just want “progressive politicians” to get in there and fuck things up “for the good of society,” don'tcha?
Little stevie, I don't know that you can think. About the American language, about politics, about economics, about anything. What you think you think about socialism is a helluva lot less important than what you clerarly want in the way of processes and outcomes in our American economy, and that's about as truly, passionately, explicitly socialist as it's possible to get.
Either keep your fucking hands off other people's lives, liberties, and property, stevie, or you're an intrusive shit-disturber trying to get government goons with guns to do your extorting for you. It really is that binary. Bugs the shit out of you, doesn't it?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:33 pm
hey, xxcb – what part of ‘pro bono [publico]‘ don’t you ‘get’?
i know, it’s a bit of a stretch to expect to know ANY latin (it is afterall a language that pre-dates when they think the ‘world’ started) but, this one’s pretty common. pro bono [publico] = for the public good. and, that would mean that ALAN KEYES’s (yeah, sure now THERE’S a rational source) own attorney doesn’t even understand the concept which doesn’t bode well for the (after)’birther’s’ chances in court. and, it puts him is the same ‘stead’ as Oily Taints with her know nothing dip-shit online correspondence course legal footing.
life IS good. i LOVE this ‘show’. more. fools, more i say.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
“[Obama] is spending hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars to keep this information from getting out,” said Gary Kreep, the lawyer representing former presidential candidate Alan Keyes, who sued Obama in California to prevent the state from certifying its election results.
Keyes recently called the citizenship issue “the greatest crisis this nation has ever seen” and warned of “chaos, confusion and civil war.”
Kreep has been battling Obama’s California lawyer, Fredric Woocher, to release the president’s records from Occidental College on the theory that they might provide information about his citizenship.
Woocher has threatened to seek sanctions against Kreep for pursuing the case.
“This suit, like all of the others that have been filed challenging Obama’s qualifications for the Presidency, is frivolous,” he said in an email to POLITICO, adding that he is, in fact, working pro bono. “There is absolutely no truth to the stories about the untold millions supposedly being paid to us,” he said.”
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:34 pm
Er, yeah, for stevie, there's much need to be abusive. Get to know him. Express honest opinions about your “take” on “getting to know the facts,” and he'll come at you like the rabid little weasel he truly is.
Those “facts” don't favor his Messiah, and stevie is a real Hoffer-style True Believer.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:36 pm
Oh, good. Transference. You're making progress, stevie!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
Nope. Again, you make shit up. I don't hate Golem Cohen.
I hate you.
Why is this so confusing to you, wretch?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:48 pm
If you wanted to know the facts, you would not be a birther. The facts have been publicly-available for a year.
I don't have a special interest in this issue. You're projecting.
I just don't suffer fools.
Speaking of which…did you have a point?
Oh yeah, you want to know the facts to your satisfaction. Be my guest. But if you post something that is not true, don't bitch when you get called on it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:49 pm
Right. That's all true. Not completely pulled out of your ass.
You make death threats against the President and fantasize about seeing him get forcibly raped behind bars.
And you want to talk about “abusive?”
Fuck you, you ignorant, gutless bastard.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:50 pm
Aw, stevie, 'cause you hate anybody who wants to see your piece-of-shit Mombasa Messiah cough up his friggin' birth certificate.
Scares the piss out of you, and makes you all nervous and upset, and you start biting your nails and playing with yourself, and the other people in the dayroom get upset at the spectacle you make of yourself.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:51 pm
“and 'progressive' perfectly understandable as code-talk for 'socialist.'”
In your world, “progressive” means “socialist.”
Gee, and I thought you misused the word “Socialist.”
Perfectly understandable, just as you say. Idiot.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:52 pm
Er, yeah, stevie. You go right on that way. Just fine. They got your bite piece handy? Don't want you chewing any more chunks out of your forearms, y'know.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:56 pm
You are not. You're still the same useless piece of shit you were when you were born.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 12:57 pm
You are nothing other than a Zionist who wants two-tier Zionist socialism imposed on the US. You simply could not be more deceptive and disgusting.
Pingback posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
[...] According to a posting in the Washington Independent, a “source” said the document was nothing more than an alteration of a “certified copy of registration of birth” from an Australian “Bomford” document that also had been posted on the Internet. [...]
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:09 pm
Nope.
I don't hate anyone but you. I know you cannot understand that. But I'll keep writing it for you anyway.
I am neither scared nor nervous about anything to do with President Obama, but after Dr. Tiller got shot, I will say that assholes like you who make death threats against public figures do make me a bit fidgety.
I don't bite my nails. When I play with myself it has nothing to do with politics.
No one, besides possibly Golem, is upset at watching me bat your nonsense back at you. That is why they tell me to keep doing it. That is why they do the same thing.
As usual, you steer well clear of the facts. Wretch.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:12 pm
Zionist? Oh that's rich.
Tell me, what do you even MEAN by that term? Something to do with Israel? The only people who accuse others of being Zionist are in Arab countries. That's an odd label for you to sling at me before you tried any others.
Deceptive? Not really. I'm a straight-shooter. I call it like I see it. You're basing this on what, exactly?
I don't care if you think I'm disgusting. I'm telling racists that they're racist. The guy you wrote you “couldn't agree more” with has littered this website with racially-charged death threats against our President.
So your opinion, Golem, seems a tad on the biased side to me.
Forgive me for not losing sleep over being in your good graces.
What was that you were saying about no need to be abusive? It got lost in your hypocrisy.
Happy reading.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
I think that a certain degree of paranoia is only to be expected whilst we've got a little shyster Moslem fraud in the White House, with his finger on the button.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:18 pm
Ooh, good zinger!
I'm glad that you were able to take time out of your busy day to add substantive facts and a fresh perspective to our civilized debate, Golem.
Do you take yourself seriously? You called me a Zionist for no fucking reason, so I'm gonna go with “not really.”
Good, because I don't take you seriously either.
If, last year, I said the President is Georgie, you would immediately know I am not trying to be taken seriously. I could say the same about you and your attempt to be derogatory with “Barry.”
So even without the absurd Zionist thing, you don't exactly give off the “dignified, mature, objective truth-seeker” vibe.
But the vibe you do give off is uninteresting. Unfortunately, you cannot seem to tear yourself away from MY every word.
That's what makes it so silly. If you want to have a debate, have it. If you want to seek the truth, seek it. If you want to bitch about Barry, go to TownHall or RedState.
If you're at a liberal website, like this one, expect liberals to disagree with you when you make shit up. That does not make us Zionists.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:20 pm
You know exactly what a Zionist is. You are one; through and through. And it's not abusive unless you make it so, it's just a fact which permeates every thought, every word, every utterance you make. You are not a normal healthy human being.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:22 pm
Maybe, but you are though. You are straight Zionist, and it tells, and it stinks!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:30 pm
That was helpful.
I asked you what you meant by using an absurdly inapplicable term.
You say I know what a Zionist is. Yes…which is why I asked you what you meant by it, because it obviously has zero real-world application to me.
You aren't going to get very far by accusing me of being something, even if you claim it permeates my every thought, word, et cetera…
if you have absolutely nothing to back up your silly claims.
I may not be normal. Depends on what you mean. But I'm healthy. I don't even need your “doctor” friend Tuci78 to tell me that.
Good luck holding up your end of the “debate” you're so concerned about having.
Looks to me like you just sling meaningless insults at people you cannot debate with.
Predictable.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:32 pm
LOL. You called me a “Zionist” and you cannot even spell “Muslim.”
That's the only way your insult could have been any sillier.
We can expect paranoia from birthers, regardless of any fingers on any buttons. You're hilarious! Do you publish a newsletter, by any chance? I'd love to read it and find out how many other zany ideas you're willing to confess to having.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:34 pm
You quote his legal team (an unbiased source of course, since they agree with your viewpoint) as the source of this revelation. Extraordinary! Why doesn't he just show is birth certificate?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:35 pm
These aren't identical, “given under my hand and seal” begins and ends at a different location, the Australian document does not leave much room for the date, but the 1964 document does. Also the vertical lines are located at a different position.
These are probably different due to the realm's use of similar forms for the region, but the local records differ.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:36 pm
Another zinger!
I'm not a Zionist. I know you're going to come back with “yes you are.”
You're silly, Golem. Is that really all you can come up with — that I'm “Zionist?”
That's not just stupid, it is absurd. It “tells” me little other than that your reasoning “stinks.” You think the word Muslim is spelled with TWO different letters — “Moslem!”
You've got to be a parody. I'm going to ignore you until you actually post a factual claim about the birther issue. Until then you're just stuck on Zionist and stupid.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:41 pm
wipinitboss, it's not clear to me what the thrust of your observation about the two documents not being identical is.
I'm just curious whether those discrepancies make you believe that the Kenyan document is fake or authentic.
To me, it's beyond obvious that information and formatting on the Australian document was used to forge the “Kenyan” one.
It seems that you are positing something else entirely. But before I go off half-cocked, I wanted to check with you and see if you could flesh out your opinion at all.
Thanks.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:45 pm
No. I quoted Politico. Politico is a right-wing website that is well-regarded for its credibility.
Besides, the Politico article quotes Obama's actual attorney, who is NOT being paid at all — pro bono. That information is publicly-available. If you claim the source is lying, say so.
Or just admit that you were proven wrong, and grow the fuck up.
He did show his birth certificate. A year ago. Where were you for the last 3 weeks? Everyone knows that.
OH, you mean his original birth certificate. He doesn't show that because he doesn't need to. He posted his COLB online and that's good enough for anyone who is not being disingenuous. Especially considering, as the links I've shown you from the National Review Online and elsewhere make clear, there is no evidence that would possibly convince you birthers.
Oh, and of course, the original is locked up and private pursuant to state law.
Anything else I can help you with?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:54 pm
“He doesn't show that because he doesn't need to.” … he does if he wants this to go away.
“He did show his birth certificate. A year ago. … Everyone knows that.” Er, no due, they don't! That is kinda why we are here, no? + you just said that he hasn't shown it. So WTF are you going on about?
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:55 pm
and will you please get off of the right wing left wing paradigm, there is no difference between left and right these days. They are just colours, blue and red. You don't like X when the blue ones are in? Then vote for the red ones! You don't like X when the red ones are in? Then vote for the blues ones! Yeah!! Some choice!! Blue, or red … but still always X.
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 1:59 pm
Hey, there you are, monkeymolester!
You're just in time.
Well, just in time for making references to my cock. Tuci78 seems to have gone to bed. So you can take over his shift. Learn some new words. He has a better vocabulary than you.
You're also just in time to contribute your impressive civilized debating skills to our little polite gathering. Golem and xxcb will appreciate your presence.
Until, that is, they read that post where you go on a ridiculous rant against everyone in the world and call everyone freaks and morons and things like that, before telling us how happy you would be to kill us all.
Of course, being birthers, they may not abandon you to your fate just yet. But odds aren't good that they'll want to come over and hold that monkey down for you. It has to have sobered up by now, huh?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
“there is no difference between left and right these days.”
I called you “stupid” before.
I'm sorry. I apologize.
I was wrong.
You're crazy.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:05 pm
1. Who the hell says he wants this to go away? I sure never said that. I keep posting about how this is wonderful free advertising for Democrats.
That is why I'm here. I want to make sure you birthers don't give up just because Orly Taitz is drilling holes in your credibility and you're all out to sea.
2. Yes, everyone does know that he showed his birth certificate.
We are here because you birthers cannot accept the fact that he's President.
I never said he hasn't shown his birth certificate. I wrote that he posted it online a year ago. I also wrote that the original is being stored pursuant to state law.
I am sure you are confused by this. Nowhere did I state your real concern. America somehow failed to notice that Obama's black.
Don't worry. You can keep misconstruing what I write and pretending not to understand what this is all about. You're a birther. That's in your job description.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:06 pm
Hey! What about me fuckhead? You hate me! Don't you? Oh and we already knew you play with yourself. We know you bite your dirty little nails, just to get all the poop of of them after you have been flinging it around in defense of your Mombasa Messiah (Thanks Tuci, that's perfect!).
Oh and who keeps telling you “to keep doing it”? Your handlers there at Acorn? Pathetic welfare loser.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:14 pm
I can hear you screeching and rattling your cage from here. Don't they give you banana breaks there at Acorn?.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:18 pm
Well, where are the differences? We have not seen any yet. Who is Barry Sotero's science officer? Oh, it's a well known eugenicist who wrote a whole book about the need for and proposing methods of population reduction. Who is Barry Sotero's cheif of staff? Oh, it's the son of an Irgun terrorist and ex-Israeli army officer … hmmm… very neutral choice wrt the middle east … big change there. Gee, thanks lefties!
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:23 pm
What has this got to do with him being black? Oh, you are playing the race card! How very predictable!
“I also wrote that the original is being stored pursuant to state law.” Well as president he should issue an executive order to get that certificate to prove it … then there would be no argument.
You think you are a “Democrat”. No. You are a human being. Democrat and Republican are just paradigms set up like football teams, it is a distraction for the weak of mind. To make us fight each other. They are the same thing! Just different puppets, same strings.
________________________________
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:44 pm
The question isn’t if you are a Zionist. The question is does Golem know what a Zionist is? .
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:44 pm
Did you hear that everyone? Steviemonkey is a “HATER”!!! OMG!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:44 pm
So, let me get this straight. I think you said once that your mother was a guilt-ridden White girl in Germany when she met your father, a hate-”whitey”, Negro soldier stationed there. They went to the disco. Next thing you know, they made a big mistake. The best part of you ran down your mother's leg. The after-birth somehow survived. You grew up hating “Whitey” (like your Obamessiah). You ended up working at Acorn to help create more “Neighborhoods of Color”, are going to some kind of “affirmative action” law school for elementary school graduates and volunteering for pooh propaganda flinging and Mombasa Messiah diversion and stonewalling on the night shift. Isn't that about it? Or are you some other kind of crossbred atrocity? Maybe a howler monkey and a baboon? Hopefully such a cross would not produce viable offspring. Remember now Chongo, the secret to evolving is to just keep bangin' them rocks together. Oh look! Subsidized peanuts!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
Ok if he has nothing to hide then why is he afraid to show the documents. He is hiding something, does not make a difference if he is black, white, asian, indian or frence. What is he hiding, the people have the RIGHT to know period.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:50 pm
Move over, naturalborn and Aristotle. Time for a new Birther Hall of Fame contestant.
I submit to you: xxcb the anti-Semite.
xxcb posted 1 day ago that Orly Taitz being in Israel sets off “alarm bells” for him/her.
anti-Semite went on to explain that Orly is a “false flag” for Israel and is seeking to besmirch the otherwise-sterling credibility of 9/11 Truther Phil Berg.
anti-Semite went on to tell me that as far as he/she is concerned, “Israelis in general cannot be trusted, and the same thing for U.S.-Israeli dual citizens.”
anti-Semite took issue with my National Review Online quote and link to the effect that Obama's COLB is his “real” birth certificate and that is all that's necessary.
In fact, after a couple of rounds of calling ME a troll, anti-Semite finally told me he/she doesn't have time for evidence, so don't bother posting links. He/she said he/she “only has a set of mantras to repeat.”
FTW
I have never had a birther come right out and admit that. Methinks we're dealing with a Freeper or maybe RedState. My money is on freeper.
I post the best parts of the sequence here, for those who aren't satisfied with the executive summary… The whole thing is on this thread, so I won't put the whole thing here…
“Erm, Orly Taitz is currently in Israel. I don't know about you, but that rings some alarms bells for me.” — xxcb
________
xxcb 21 hours ago
“Well I think her argument is not too bad, but since she is Israeli she may be carrying out a false flag. I.e. Being a straw woman to knock down and then the much more serious and professional Phil Berg case will get confused with her in the minds of the media and the public.”
_______________________
stephenperry 10 hours ago
“Wow. I can only assume you're joking.
You don't often read “much more serious and professional” followed by the name of a 9/11 Truther.
I guess, relatively speaking, you are correct. But only because birthers are dumber than the people who pay 99 cents to respond to polls via text message, but only indicate they have “no opinion.”
Yikes.”
xxcb 52 minutes ago
“Oh, so ALL “birthers” are dumb. And this kind of statement is evidence that you are not a troll?”
________________________________
stephenperry 40 minutes ago
“I wasn't seeking to provide evidence that I'm not a troll. I'm not a troll. You're stupid if you think I am. But at least you're not alone. Many of you birthers seem to think anyone who disagrees with you is a paid Obama blogger. It was flattering until I realized you just say that to everyone. I wanted to be special…
But, seriously, if you want to get down to it, I thought you were joking about the reference to Phil Berg. That's why I wrote that this had to be parody.
If you were SERIOUSLY positing that Orly Taitz is a “false flag” and that Israel is somehow involved, and that the goal is to discredit Phil Berg, a man who not only already had his suit rejected by every court up to and including the SCOTUS…
but is also a 9/11 Truther….
then, yes. I AM indicating that YOU are dumb. I have already gone on record as to the stupidity of birthers in general.
You, however, are the first one I've encountered who made the “let's save Phil Berg from a credibility attack” argument. Even other birthers don't think Phil Berg is credible. He's just willing to say anything to make a buck.”
___________________________
xxcb 21 minutes ago
“Anybody who has links to Israel has to be viewed with suspicion, given the history. E.g. see “911 Missing Links”. Doesn't mean they are all bad, e.g. there are some honest Israelis who fight for truth and justice … but in general the fact that she is in Israel rings alarm bells for me. Israelis on the whole cannot be trusted, nor can dual US-Israeli citizens.
Phil Berg is a great patriot, I wish him luck in his search for truth and justice … so should you. His case should be heard.
Why are you so against the idea of Obama just showing the real, actual, birth certificate?”
________________________________
stephenperry 8 minutes ago
“'Anybody who has links to Israel has to be viewed with suspicion, given the history. Israelis on the whole cannot be trusted, nor can dual US-Israeli citizens.'
You are absurd. You cannot tell me that Israelis cannot be trusted and expect to be taken seriously.
I'm not against the idea of Obama showing his actual birth certificate. He posted it online a year ago, stupid. I'm not saying you can't go to factcheck.org and look at it until your heart breaks.
As to the original birth certificate, news flash, little one…I am not the one keeping it from you! The Constitution of the United States is the one you have a beef with. Go tell it. Focus on the Tenth Amendment.
Then go tell Janice Okubo to get her boss, Republican Governor Linda Lingle, to come to your house and apologize for telling the world that Obama's original vital records say what the COLB says.
Why are you so fixated on seeing more evidence when you apparently contend (without evidence) that the COLB is fake?
Me: “Here's my birth certificate. It got me a passport and driver's license.”
You: “That's fake. Show me the real one.”
Me: “Here's the Original Birth Certificate.”
You: “It's fake.”
Me: “What the hell makes you say that?”
You: “Israelis cannot be trusted.”
Me: “But I'm not Israeli by any stretch!”
You: “Show me your birth certificate.”
Silly. I won't even get to the “great patriot,” Phil Berg.
Did you come here from TownHall or RedState or something? You have to be a special kind of stupid to express wacky anti-Semitism on a LIBERAL newspaper comment board. Doofus.”
_____________________
xxcb 1 minute ago
“It is not anti-semitic to distrust Israelis. You will find that many semites, including some Jewish semites, distrust Israelis. Doofus.”
___________________________
xxcb 19 hours ago
“One fact remains … Barry Sotero (aka Barrak Obama) has refused to simply show us all his birth certificate. Wouldn't you like to see his birth certificate? Proof that he is a Natural Born US Citizen? That would shut us all up immediately!
“reich-wing” … are you stuck in the left-right paradigm? You poor thing!”
________________________________
stephenperry 1 hour ago
“Nothing would shut you up.
He has posted his birth certificate online. That's it. Period. End of story. IF you were sincere. But you're not.
It's okay though. The rest of the world, even the right-wing world, knows you're full of it. Check out the editors of the National Review Online, from a week ago:
“The fundamental fiction is that Obama has refused to release his “real” birth certificate. This is untrue. The document that Obama has made available is the document that Hawaiian authorities issue when they are asked for a birth certificate. There is no secondary document cloaked in darkness, only the state records that are used to generate birth certificates when they are requested.
If one applies for a United States passport, the passport office will demand a birth certificate. It defines this as an official document bearing “your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records.” The Hawaiian birth certificate President Obama has produced—the document is formally known as a “certificate of live birth”—bears that information. It has been inspected by reporters, and several state officials have confirmed that the information in permanent state records is identical to that on the president’s birth certificate—which is precisely what one expects, of course, since the state records are used to generate those documents when they are requested. In other words, what President Obama has produced is the “real” birth certificate of myth and lore.”
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTRjMTFhMz…
______________________________
xxcb 59 minutes ago
“yes, you would like us all to shut up wouldn't you troll … but unfortunately for you this is still a free country (just).
You quote this source as though it is written by God. People are disputing the document he tried to pass off as a birth certificate. That is kinda the issue here dude! Der.”
__________________________________
stephenperry 15 minutes ago
“Der!
You can keep calling me dude. It adds to your credibility.
I don't quote that source as though it is written by God. It is written by right-wingers who HATE Obama.
If THEY say this birther thing is crap, which they do, and you can see it for yourself, little one, you cannot say it is because they are in Obama's pocket or they are liberal weenies.
If you have some evidence upon which you are “disputing the document he tried to pass off as a birth certificate,” let's see it.
Because telling me that the COLB is not a birth certificate, when I showed you the link to the aforementioned right-wing website directly contradicting you, isn't persuasive.
In fact it makes you look….well, I hate to overuse the word, but it fits… it makes you look stupid.
But, NO, I do not want you to shut up. YOU are the one who wrote “that would shut us all up.”
Florida Christian alert! “This could all be laid to rest so easily!”
I want you to record your views and put them on YouTube. I would tell you to go visit your local GOP representative and hound him or her about this incessantly. But you're not from here. So we'll just have to stick with the internet for you.
Calling me a troll is amusing. Your lack of critical thinking skills is what prevents you from understanding that not everyone who disagrees with you is paid by the President of the United States.
Like I told you, you're stupid. It's ok if you don't get any of this.
I'll still be here to correct you and tell you that you're stupid.”
____________________________
xxcb 6 minutes ago
“Look, dude. I don't have time to look at evidence and crazy stuff like that so stop posting links, I just got a set of mantras to repeat. I don't even think you should be restricted from being president on the basis of “Natural Born”. If we got rid of that restriction then this wouldn't matter.”
________________________________
stephenperry 1 minute ago
“LMAO @ you not having time to look at evidence.
Birther hall of fame answer.”
____________________________________________
Ok, people, there you have it. No time to look at evidence. Just wants to troll around repeating mantras and being a wacky anti-Semite. I can't make this stuff up!
Hall of Fame? Jim, Ken, JJ, Steve X?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:53 pm
He's not hiding anything. No other President ever posted their birth certificate online.
What are THEY hiding?
Your suspicion is not evidence.
What “RIGHT” are you referring to that the people have, exactly? And how does it get around the Tenth Amendment? Hawai'i makes its own laws about private record retention and release, as do all other 49 states.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:56 pm
I didn't say any of that.
The difference between me and you, or ONE difference, is that I mock you using your own words. I re-post your nonsense posts.
You invent stuff I didn't ever say and try to pass it off as me. But you're stupid, so it falls flat.
You stole the thing about the best part of you running down your mother's leg from two different people, one of whom is me and the other is kennethetucker.
You actually wrote “Whitey.” God, you're dumb.
Anything else, monkeylover?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
That was indeed teh awesome. But you know you can't post links to the National Review on this board, because it's biased too. Ever since Obama paid off everyone that has ever worked or will for the magazine NR's credibility is definitely in question.
Oh, and I mentioned the future employees of the NR because I think the conspiracy should be officially amended to include time travel. These birfers need to up the crazy because I'm starting to get bored.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:09 pm
What Hawaiian “Long Form” Certificates of Live Birth look like.
Here is one side by side with Obama’s “CertiFICATION”
http://www.youdecidepolitics.com/wp-content/upl…
A blank one.
http://www.cfourstrategies.com/colb.jpg
Some guy named Alan 1963
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
One of the Nordyke twins from 1961 (a day after Obama)
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-content/upl…
An anonymous one from 1978. Yep still using the long form in 1978!
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/HawaiinBirt…
Only doctor signed birth certificate yet to surface for Obama but this could be a forgery.
http://patriotpost.us/images/broadcasts/humor/i…
Oh, yes, and then there is this “Certification” from 2008 which has not been seen or handled outside of any of the Obama friendly sources that have posted different versions using scans and digital photos posted on line. This is all Obama has ever offered as proof that he was born on US soil. Notice there is no mention of a hospital or the name of any attending physician. Hawaii has now admitted that an original long form exists or have lied and said there is one when there isn’t. Since it has never been posted or released by Obama, there is no way to know what it might say. But here is what Obama’s people offer. Again, Obama’s alleged “CertificATION”of Live Birth (probably a forgery)
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:27 pm
Well, I wasn't sure you said that, so maybe you didn't but it's really difficult to read through all the insults and personal assaults that you inflict on people when they are posting ANYTHING YOU don't agree with 100%. I heard and used the “running down mom's leg thing” when you were still actually running down your mom's leg, you stupid little shit. Kind of like you nursery rhyme, “I am rubber, you are glue”. Geez. Fucking grow up. How do you even walk around in the street in public without getting you ass kicked ten times a day? Or is your BRAVE in-your-face-mutha-fucka persona reserved for online, keyboard attacks. Pathetic little pussy. I was right about the rest of it though. I know it. It must “suck to be you”. Thanks Ken-the-monkey-fucker.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:29 pm
Still didn't fix those links, randypuppy!
But at least you took out your wacko threats! That's progress…
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
I know what you mean about bored. How are the birthers gonna top Orly's fake Kenyan birf sirtifikat?
But don't worry, xxcb and darpot, along with TEWS_Pilot, are drinking extra Kool-Aid, judging by their recent communications with me.
Without the National Review, who can I cite?
Oh yeah. World Net Daily:
“A separate WND investigation into Obama's certification of live birth utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren't originally there.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI…
That's from August 23, 2008. Birthers have no excuse. Just racism and stupidity.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:34 pm
LMAO. Your absurdly whiny runt persona must go over well in public.
Get back to plotting your role in that Civil War. Saved up enough for a bullet yet?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:38 pm
No randypuppy.
I don't hate you.
You make me laugh. Isn't that obvious by now, monkeytoucher?
You are a funny little dumbshit, I'll give you that.
Tuci78 isn't funny. Not as dumb as you, either. You're not intelligent enough or wicked enough to hate.
You're just a doofus. A doofus who said a lot of racist things and a lot of tough guy things. Just keep your “steel' in your pants and away from my ass, or I really will have to kick your sorry petticoat-wearing candy ass, loser.
But don't flatter yourself. I don't hate you. I just think you're really fucking funny. Because you write such ridiculous shit.
All I have to do is use your monkey taunts against you and you lose your fucking mind and threaten everyone on this board!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:42 pm
Yes I did dumbass! Just pretend they're bugs and you are a hungry little monkoid and click on 'em. But that wouldn't be much pretending on your part. Would it?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 3:44 pm
Easy, easy. Don't get excited. I'm tired of you wetting yourself.
Don't blame me because you didn't fix your links last time or this time and got called on it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:11 pm
Here's the part where I would that it wouldn't make any sense for World Nut Daily to say that they were for the birth certificate before they were against it. But it IS World Nut Daily, so I can't say I'm surprised that that's exactly what they did.
I think somebody should post Joe Biden's official Mexican birth certificate online. I can't wait to see how these stupid fuckers deal with two illegal aliens in the White House.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:17 pm
no NOTHING (after)'birthers' have no more 'right' to Obama' private information than the State of FL had a 'right' to RushLimpBalls private med record (DAMN you ACLU! – he's STILL be in jail instead of throwing around nazi accusations if they didn't pull his fat, swollen, drug-addled, pus-filled ASS out the 'fire' for doctor shopping for hillbilly heroin).
what are you 'hiding' behind the bible verse 'nic'? “You call me 'Teacher' and 'Lord,' and rightly so, for that is what I am.” 'Teacher', i don't think so. Just another wrapped a little to 'tight' AmeriKan Taliban religious wack-job, probably. or, is some kinda 'foot fetish' thing with that john 13:13 thing, 'teacher'?
i hope he NEVER shows ANY documentation EVER. it will just continue to fuel your delusions and further expose the reich-wing for what they are. fear-based, xenophoibc, racists that are only concerned about one 'fact': the FACT that there is a black man in the(ir) white house and… he's gonna be there for another 3.5-7.5 YEARS, 'teacher' so, you might want to consider adding that to your curriculum. or not, matters not. SUCKS to be you, you betcha !! WINK !
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:36 pm
I still haven't seen Dubya's birth certificate OR his family tree, and under birfer law I'm entitled to see both. I demand reassurance that George H.W. and Barbara weren't first cousins.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
What other president had a foreign parent? I thought Obama once said all 57 states. What, are you now disagreeing with your Obamessiah? You meant to say “all other 56 states” I'm sure. Infidel.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
'crack'? naw…. i'm partial to jim Beam, susie. now, re-insert that IV drip for those fu*ked up legs and 'chill', bro.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:43 pm
Well his family tree is growing near a mud hut village somewhere near Mombasa where he was born. But the shrine that the Kenyans built to honor his birth place is also somewhere near there according to the Ambassador to the US from the Republic of Kenya. I'm sure the local tribesmen would be willing to show you around before they boil you and eat you. Oh yeah, and by your shoddy and shifting definition of “birfers”, most of the Kenyans would qualify as such since most of them KNOW he was born there and have all been more than happy to proclaim that FACT, from the Ambassador on down.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:48 pm
Here, is a perfect example of a pointless, delusional, lunatic, raving. This is how Steviemonkey's mind “works” (or not) He must have gotten hold of some moldy peanuts.
“Why are you so fixated on seeing more evidence when you apparently contend (without evidence) that the COLB is fake?
Me: “Here's my birth certificate. It got me a passport and driver's license.”
You: “That's fake. Show me the real one.”
Me: “Here's the Original Birth Certificate.”
You: “It's fake.”
Me: “What the hell makes you say that?”
You: “Israelis cannot be trusted.”
Me: “But I'm not Israeli by any stretch!”
You: “Show me your birth certificate.”
Silly. I won't even get to the “great patriot,” Phil Berg.
Did you come here from TownHall or RedState or something? You have to be a special kind of stupid to express wacky anti-Semitism on a LIBERAL newspaper comment board. Doofus.”"
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 4:50 pm
drip must already be 'running', susie.
there are 57 states AND territories*. and, the reich-wings constant reference to this jet-lagged misstatement NEVER ceases to amaze. like that's 'it'. we finally 'caught' Obama saying something wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_terr…
now, true Obama doesn't misspeak often so if/when he does it is noticeable, but only because Obama was follwoing a virtual shit-for-brains misspeaking MACHINE in Shrub'.
so, whatever 'works' for ya, little brain (after)'birthers'. enjoy, your 'victory'. moron(s).
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:01 pm
Yes, you're exactly right. I forgot the part of the conspiracy where Obama paid off an entire foreign nation so that his dark secret can never be revealed. Since I voted for the guy, I also really appreciate how he paid off the Bush Administration for telling the CIA and the FBI not to do any sort of background checks on him or try to stop his plot to convert us all to Space Islam.
I really think you should read my post above and incorporate time travel into the conspiracy. I mean, anyone smart enough to pull off a forty-eight year plot to take over the world probably built a working time machine at some point. If you birfers want to keep this thing rolling then you must, I repeat MUST up the crazy a few more notches.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:03 pm
“…to help create more “Neighborhoods of Color”
got a newsflash for ya, susie. by 2040+/- 5y 'whites' will be in the minority in the US.
The Census Bureau projected last August that white children will become the minority in 2023 and the overall white population will follow in 2042. The agency now says it will recalculate those figures, typically updated every three to four years, because they don't fully take into account anti-immigration policies after the September 2001 terror attacks and the current economic crisis.
The new projections, expected to be released later this year, could delay the tipping point for minorities by 10 years, given the current low rates of immigration, David Waddington, the Census Bureau's chief of projections, said in a telephone interview.
“Policies changed,” he said, in explaining why the scientific estimates were no longer valid.
“According to the latest data, the percentage growth of Hispanics slowed from 4.0 percent in 2001 to 3.2 percent last year; their slowed population growth would have been greater if it weren't for their high fertility – nearly 10 births for every death.”
http://cbs2.com/national/census.minority.popula…
so, you might want to increase that IV drip, susie. it's gonna get browner no matter how much you don't like it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:06 pm
Obama is a tyrant and he was born in Kenya! He is a progressive and a liar! People who voted for him hates America! He is not a democrat he is a Facist and Marxist agenda! He will not give up a birt certificate becuse he cannot! Obama deception on google or you tube will show you the truth!
http://www.operatiomtyranny.com watch it on this site! This will show you Obama's agenda and it is very tyrannical! Obama is not an American he is a racist and if you voted for him? You might want to move to France or even Germany! The government is not God!!! Global Warming is a hoax!
http://www.globalwarminghoax.com The Obamacare is all about eugenics! If you voted for Obama your a very very ignorant person! The Hitler mantra of CHANGE was used in 1917 and Stalin used the same! Hope and Change is for real chumps! Wake up and watch the Obama deception on http://www.operationtyranny.com and then comment back if you have the nerve?
America is a republic for the people and is all about Liberty not Change! I did not vote for McCain either? Both of the choices we had sucked! Maybe people will wake up and use the brain God gave them instead of fighting right and left and start becomming Americans and Vote for Freedom and Justice for all!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:14 pm
No he only misspeaks EVERY FUCKING TIME his handlers let his teleprompter malfunction. Then he immediately stutters, and sputters to a stop. Really impressive. Learn how to start the first word in a sentence with a capital letter and put quotation marks around your quotes instead of an apostrophe at either end. You write like a drunken chimp. And for God's sake, at least get off the fucking sauce long enough to try to make a point. Territories are not states. I don't care how tired he was. Fifty states (50). It's been that way for a while now. But then, Obama hasn't always been a US citizen and hasn't always lived here so, being a foreign alien, I can see how he would make a mistake like that. Susie.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:18 pm
I just checked them. They are working fine on this thread. But thanks for pointing out the malfunction on the other thread for me. I'll fix it so that everyone can see what a real Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth looks like. You know, the kind BHO refuses to show.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:29 pm
Well praise the Lord and pass the AMMUNITION!!! I have an idea that when the shooting starts, the trends will reverse in a hurry. That will happen long before 2040 and probably before 2012. So, it is all academic.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:44 pm
Oh. My. God. A progressive?
*jumps out of window*
“Noooooooooo!!!!!”
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:47 pm
” People who voted for him hates America! “
No, paste-eater, we LOVE America, and HATE stupidity, and, of course, this would include you and your little brain (after)'birther' buddies.
FACT: 69 MILLION of us voted for Obama. you need to keep that in mind when you start getting all ful of yourself after some white power fag (like Glenn 'Herr' Beck) gets done pumping some “we surround them' BS up your ass. it's YOU who are surrounded.
so, if YOU don't like it here, YOU can emigrate, though for the life of me, besides Siberia, i can't think of a place on the globe that you'd be comfortable in (more chalky folks than not) or, even ALLOWED into.
LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT ! Don't let the door hit you in the ass 'chalky'.
btw, you misspelled 'operation' in operationtyranny.com
and, for anyone that doesn't want bother linking thru, it's a collage of nazi and commie and the color red and vid and and and it's like Oily Taint/Sara Palin on meth jibber jabber.
and, they are STILL 'brathlessly' promoting the (debunked a week now) kenyan BC forgery…
bottom line? facts don't matter EXCEPT that there is a BLACK MAN in the WHITE HOUSE!!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 5:47 pm
Because there is stronger no proof of a massive, world-wide, decades long conspiracy to take over the world than a link to a jpeg of a birth certificate of “some guy named Alan.”
You should teach Advanced Evidence at Harvard Law.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:09 pm
No, it is just interesting how “some guy named Alan” and a whole lot of other normal, ordinary, everyday type people running around the world today who were born in Hawaii, can manage to have a copy of their long form original, doctor signed, hospital prepared, testimony to their live births, but the so-called President of the United States can't (read as “won't”) come up with one. Obama needs to get a copy onto Judge Souter's desk ASAP. He knows all about “Advanced Evidence at Harvard Law” He should know just what to do with it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
His writing style (not to mention grasp on reality) is more correct than yours. Now crawl on back into your whiskey bottle ya booze hound.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:21 pm
Of course Justice Souter would know what to do with it!
He would look at the president and say “Why are you doing this? You don't have the burden of proof. You know that in any case, the burden of proof rests solely on the plaintiff, unless the defendant raises an affirmative defense.”
Once birfers can get around that pesky burden-of-proof issue, they should be fine.
Of course, since birfers have no proof of anything they allege (shockingly enough, jpges of OTHER people's birth certificates don't count), they will never even get that far.
I'm going to send this response as an email to Orly Taitz, since her online correspondence course didn't teach her Evidence, Civil Procedure, or Professional Responsibility. If she reads this in time, she may be able to file one more frivolous lawsuit before she gets permanently disbarred.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
increase the dosage, gramps or check your IV line, cripple. when i said i was 'partial' to Jim Beam (v 'crack'/oxycontin/meth whatever you fly-over states 'little brains' are 'huffing' now) OF COURSE you ASSume that i've got the same addictive personality flaws that you and your huffing buddies have. nope. now, untangle that drip line or 'bump' the dosage and get back to dreaming about the man-drunks in your life Bill Bennet, George W. Bush Glenn 'Herr' Beck, susie.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:53 pm
on second thought, gramps, you might want to dial back that IV drip. in case you missed it, Sonya Sotomayor is now Justice Sonya Sotomayor and David Souter, retired IDIOT and, has been back in NH since the SCOTUS adjorned back in June. just one more 'FACT' that exceeds your limited 'little brain' (after)'birther' capacities. quel surprise
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
Well, I happen to believe that Orly SHOULD be disbarred in any case. But that aside, eventually the birth documentation will need to be provided at some level of the federal court system in some civil or criminal case. If I were charged under some federal statute that had been signed into law by Obama, the very first thing I would do in court is question the validity of that law by virtue of the fact that there is a question as to the eligibility of the person who did the signing of the bill, making it law. No eligibility, no law.
Any document can be requested by a defense attorney if it tends to or could in any way prove the innocence of the accused or could in any way be used to prove that no law was violated. So if the law was never valid, it is logical to say that there is no way to have violated it. How could a judge refuse to order the production for the court of some public record in a vital statistics office? If he refuses, the defense automatically has grounds for a mistrial.
In a civil case, a document like that (BC) would be something that could be included in a “request for productions” by the plaintiff. Of course, as we have seen, the sticky part of that one is that no federal judge wants to take the brunt of the merciless attacks he would be subjected to for granting standing to any plaintiff who would request such a document pertaining to Obama. It would be a case of professional (and possibly literal) suicide (someone would kill him) and these judges know this.
Just look at what happened to Lou Dobbs and imagine a judge asking the question or ordering the production of Obama's birth records, passport records (already purged), school records,etc etc. It could still happen but there might still be time for the counterfeiters to get the finishing touches on Obama's long form “original” before it has to be produced in court. The aging process and final removal or intimidation of all witnesses is kind of tricky. It must be done just right. A work in progress I'm sure.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:02 pm
I voted.
Surely I hate America.
I also drive a Hyundai.
….yup, I surely hate America.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:06 pm
I'm sure the Obagoons have been in Mombasa and have done all they can do to bribe, threaten and intimidate their way to cleaning up that paper trail. But not all the Kenyans have been bribed yet and I'm sure we haven't seen the last of the Kenyan BCs. My guess is that Phil Berg's people may have found one and it is safely locked up in Hillary's safe deposit box. Maybe the Obamessiah had the godlike ability to have been born in Mombasa and Honolulu at the very same instant. So I won't rule out your time travel theory just yet. But we can't prove this birth in two places theory yet. We still don't have a real long form from both of those places. Well, actually either of them.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:08 pm
sigh… WAYYY too much 'drip' for gramps. no one claiming there are 57 states, susie. because there were Obama campaign assets in all 50 states and 7 territories. for you drug-addled, (after)'birther's here's 'shrub':
“There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.” —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
69 M to 59 M America decided they'll take the misstatement v the McSame so… deep breaths; it's gonna be another 3.5 – 7.5 YEARS more to deal/self-med. SUCKS to be you, you betcha! wink!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:13 am
Machiavelli: “Never interfere with the enemy when he is destroying himself.”
I’ll second that. I’m SURE he’s read Machiavelli, and, he’s a sharp Chicago Pol with a junk yard dog COS in Rham. These guys ARE good, and, when they’re STILL ignoring these fools in the ‘specials’ this fall and in 2010 and 2012, there won’t be ANY indys or moderate republicans left to ‘attract’ by the huffing southern reich-wing and they’ll ‘die’ as a party.
actually, already ‘dead’, they just don’t know it. the ‘republican’ party – born 1854 of the abolition movement, died on election day 2008 when a black man became the 44th POTUS.
In a day and age where even Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, and the National Review are starting to mock the birther movement, it’s becoming obvious that the birther movement is threatening to split the Republican party right down the middle.
you GOTTA know you’re officially ‘fu*ked when ‘Herr’ Beck and that skank Coulter ‘turn’ on ya… but NOT these guys.
party on huffing (after)’birthers’ !!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:35 am
Exactly. Like the Vince Foster “murder” in the 90s and the 9/11 truthers a few years ago, some people just choose to ignore reality at every turn because it’s easier to believe in a lie than face the truth. Orly Taitz is perfect example.
Frankly, Taitz is an embarrassment to the legal profession. She’s already admitted that no evidence will convince her that Obama is legitimate because she steadfastly refuses to believe or accept any evidence that would be factually “inconvenient” to her cause. In her case, that would be all of the evidence presented by either side thus far.
Her gross misunderstanding of Constitutional Law is just one her many flaws. For some reason, she has stated repeatedly that to be a natural born citizen, one must be born to two parents who are also natural born citizens. The problem? That definition of NBC is nowhere in the Constitution. She pulled that definition of natural born citizen out of her natural born ass, and as a officer of the court, it’s her professional responsibility to (among other things) not knowingly misinterpret the law. That’s pretty much all that she has been doing for the past few months ever since her quixotic mission started. I won’t even start on her possibly crimnal attempt to offer as evidence a document that she knows to be fraudulent.
Orly Taitz is the worst kind of shyster. Whether she actually believes in anything she says or whether she’s just taking advantage of skeptical, gullible people in order to become famous, she needs to be permanently disbarred. I have no idea how she passed the California bar exam, generally considered the toughest in the country.
It’s obvious she has no regard at all for established legal precedent or courtroom procedure. She rambles, she’s incoherent, and whenever she speaks it’s obvious that she has more than a few screws loose because even SHE has no idea what the hell she’s talking about. Even if she represents her next client pro-bono, she wouldn’t be worth the money. Orly Taitz is a one-woman, walking, talking lawyer joke, and she has no business ever sticking her head inside of a courtroom ever again.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:36 pm
“The Hitler mantra of CHANGE was used in 1917 and Stalin used the same!” wow…
i'm reminded 'Bluto (John Belushi's character) in Animal House:
Bluto: Over? Did you say “over”? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
Otter: Germans?
Boon: Forget it, he's rolling.
yep. same lack of historical framing and fuax excitement. of course, like all BS (after)'birther' factless rants deserve some MOCKING:
in 1917 corporal Hilter was back in a trench on the western front in 1917
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler
and Hilter didn't have a 'change' mantra, he was ALL about national xenophobia, bitching about losing (WW1) and pining for better times as in the past and a new autocracy. BUT, don't let the FACTS get in the way of a good 'rant', (after)'birther' you huffers do 'amuse'.
and Stalin too? i'm surprised you left out Mao and Pol Pot of your 'boggey men' round up. what a moron. you might want to trying squeezing in some biographical reading into the summer book list, ray.
and because you sound so much like 'them', for your next bumper sticker:
PALIN – PREJEAN – 2012
DRILL us BABY DRILL us
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:38 am
“How bout you…?”
5’11 100Kilos, half marathon fit, armed to the teeth (Rem 700, Rem 870 TAC shotgun, AK-47, Bushmaster 223) + beaucoup rounds [10K +/-, i practice]), on 70 acres in the mountains 50mi from everywhere and and artisan well piped into/thru an earth-bermed 20 shipping container with a ranged and cleared killing field of fire, 2 escape/flanking tunnels, 3 pit bulls, 3yrs survival MREs, and, 3 cases of Jim Beam.
this ain’t the upper west side of manhattan, susie, there aren’t any volvos, no limp wrists, and no fear. so, you can stow that chest puffing, susie. NOT impressed, in the least. you’ll never make it outta Colorado Springs if there is an ‘shit’. i’ll be here or in Central America/Costa Rica, banging some young Latina. it most certainly does NOT ‘suck’ to be me.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:42 pm
I'm 6'2″, 200 lbs, bench press 200lbs, three sets twice a week and then do all the other muscle groups. I'm an expert marksman with a rifle and with a pistol. I am on no medications. I still do all the things I did as a Marine Corps Infantry officer years ago. So you can cut the “gramps” and the IV drip splooge. And as far as fooling people goes, your 69 million dumbass, welfare fucks and self destructive libs just voted to kill what's left of your tax base that has always supported your shiftless fool lifestyles. I don't think your Mombasa Messiah is going to last even one more year and if he does manage to last 3.5 more years, he will be leaving with a dishonorable discharge. But I don't care. I'm having fun with this. It can all fall apart tomorrow. I'm not worried at all. Have water. Have food. Have rifle. Have ammo.
How bout you Susie? Have a banana? It's gonna suck to be you! Nudge nudge grin grin wink wink!
Pingback posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:47 pm
[...] And here. [...]
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 7:53 pm
Did that big long rant make you feel like a man?
What a freak'n waste of disk space.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:05 am
“produce is extremely dangerous for any judge”
Federal judges, and each of them, are appointed for life. You cannot remove a sitting judge just because you disagree with his or her rulings.
I wouldn’t expect you to start letting truth get in the way of flowery paranoia, wretch.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:13 am
Steph, you refuted NONE of the FACTS that I or anyone else posted; you just went for the “cheese” with all the baloney…better put the dunce cap back on
the top of your head before all the air leaks out.
Make a stab at rebutting the FACTS, like the lack of and laughably absurd information on the COLB. For example, is “AFRICAN” a RACE? Apparently
whoever issued Obama’s COLB thought so or made the COLB “politically correct”, yet s/he elected to list his mother as “CAUCASIAN,” not “AMERICAN.”
Why? What’s the difference between “AFRICAN” and “AMERICAN” using the logic employed for listing his father as “AFRICAN”? He’s actually mixed if
you look at his “nationality” and ancestry. “AFRICAN” sure wasn’t recognized as a “RACE” in 1961. Africa is a CONTINENT, and it contains many
“RACES.” Can ANYONE get a passport with ONLY a COLB? NO, according to the State Department. How did Obama obtain a passport using ONLY
his COLB? What other OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS did he have to provide? Why not release them and his long form birth certificate and all his other
records if he has nothing to hide? He should be PROUD of his transcripts and his “professional papers” and his other writings and lectures and the rest
of his blah, blah, blah. He certainly doesn’t have to worry about “identity theft.” No one in the entire UNIVERSE would try to steal HIS identity…they just
might end up feeding the fish. With all that “cheese” on your breath, I wouldn’t be surprised that the cat got your tongue.
…Like the sign on the back of the old truck climbing a mountain road says, “I may be slow, but I’m ahead of YOU.” :)
When you finally get bucked off your high horse and decide to post serious comments like a civil adult, other posters might just begin to treat you with the
respect you will have earned, including me if I decide to post any further in this topic. You appear to be intelligent enough but just angry and stuck in your
ideology. That combination can make for a rough ride in life. Once you get past that first disappointment of finding out something you believed isn’t true or
someone you trusted has deceived you, you’re halfway to recovery…and whatever you do, NEVER let insults from some stranger on a chatboard get to
you….NEVER…that is one of the oldest and most important rules in debate…and the Alynskiites use it constantly. When it fails or when it is turned on
them, they resort to violence. The equivalent in debate is resorting to “ad hominem” attacks, and judges consider that the tactic of the loser in a debate.
The Obama Alynskiites’ motto is, “use the power of persuasion; if that fails, use power to persuade.” You need look no further than the SEIU union thugs
who beat up the black Conservative just for handing out flags with “Don’t Tread On Me” printed on them last night in St. Louis at the Russ Carnahan “open
for union thugs but closed to the 1000 ordinary citizens locked out” town hall meeting.
http://www.gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/08/pajamas-media-article-seiu-thugs-teach.html
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/seiu-thugs-teach-protestors-the-chicago-way-of-politics/
…gotta run,
Regards
======================
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:27 am
Sorry, stevie. I didn’t consider how quickly you’d fasten on a typographical error.
I had meant to write:
“…never ‘had such a document…”
That being the case, your note immediately above is null and void.
Not that that’s a unique characteristic of just that one post of yours, of course.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:29 pm
All those were issued prior to 2001. Post 2001 all certified copies from the state of Hi. are short forms, just as is the case in the majority of states now.
And you still miss the point. He's provided a valid Hi. BC. You can scream and cry for the “long form” all you want, but why should he?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:32 am
…didn’t see this one earlier. This flea is easy to flick. To paraphrase a former POTUS, “It all depends on the meaning of the word ‘authentic’.” A
counterfeit twenty dollar bill is an “authentic” court document if it is presented as an exhibit during the trial of a counterfeiter, now isn’t it? It isn’t a “figment
of someone’s imagination,” it physically exists, so it is “authentic.” It is an “authentic” piece of evidence because it is the one passed by the counterfeiter,
the act of which then became the crime for which s/he is being prosecuted.
Now, go back and address the legitimate discrepancies and lack of required information on Obama’s COLB, the one with which he obtained a passport
from a State Department that says flatly a passport will NOT be issued SOLELY on the basis of a COLB.
Now for the code:
Place a piece of Saran Wrap (Cling Wrap will also work) over your TV screen, have a box of crayons ready, and wait for the screen to light up. When it
does, just connect the dots to spell out the secret message.
…more “cheese” with that whine?
==================
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:43 pm
Well, if you get charged for a violation of a federal statute and your lawyer tells you that the best defense is that the President is illegitimate, then…fire your lawyer. Immediately. That would leave the realm of a plausible affirmative defenses, and it would also be a lot more trouble than it's worth. Being punished under a federal statute may get you into federal court, but you probably wouldn't be able to just back-door your way into seeing the President's birth certificate by raising his illegitimacy as a defense. Even if that did work and you got your hands on it, you would still have the burden of proving beyond a preponderance of the evidence that the president was, in fact illegitimate. From a trial strategy standpoint, it would turn what is likely a simple case in to a much bigger issue with a lot more work involved. On top of that, only Congress can remove the president from office, so it won't happen in a low-level criminal case.
Another potential problem is that Hawaii has a law that expressly prohibits the release of the “real” documents that so many people claim are being hidden; that would raise a number of 10th and 11th amendment issues, since a federal judge (or any federal official, for that matter) would not have the authority to make the State of Hawaii break one of it's own laws for discovery purposes. The only way to get around that problem would be to file a suit against Hawaii, claiming that it's prohibition against releasing people's vital records is somehow unconstitutional. Since many states have had those laws of the books for decades, that outcome is unlikely.
As far as federal judges themselves are concerned, they don't have the authority to “grant” standing to any plaintiff. Standing is a doctrine of federal (and state) law that dates back to English common law, and plaintiffs only have standing to sue the government in a set number of circumstances. There are reams of case law at all levels of the federal court system that define when a plaintiff has standing, and under what circumstances that plaintiff can sue; federal judges are bound by those decisions whether they like it or not.
As far as Dobbs is concerned, he really should have done his research better. One of his guest hosts debunked every myth and rumor about the president's birth certificate that has been raised thus far, and a few days later Dobbs hopped right back on the crazy train to conspiracy town. As a TV show host, the only thing he's bound by are ratings and his bosses at CNN. People boycott TV shows all the time for a number of reasons. Dobbs show wasn't the first, and it definitely won't be the last.
If your defense is the president's lack of citizenship and/or eligibility, you would also have to show how school records and everything else you mentioned would be relevant to that defense. Since school records and passport/travel records can't be used to prove anyone's citizenship (let alone eligibility for president), their relevance to that kind of case would make any of those things inadmissible. It would take a lot more than “I think he's hiding something” to compel the release of those records.
As far as allegations that the president has some secret lab somewhere full of people making fake documents and “intimidating witnesses,” that's just ridiculous and overly paranoid. That type of black helicopter nonsense is exactly why people on all sides of the political spectrum are laughing at the birthers.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:44 am
Now, now. Remember, ACORN is an acronym. All caps, please
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 8:53 pm
Why can't you idiots just join the 21st century? The MAJORITY of states issue certified short forms now. Hi. started doing it that way in 2001, but Pa., as another example, started in the late 70's. In Pa. you can still get a photocopy of the original record that is “suitable for framing,” but not CERTIFIED. I.e. you couldn't use it to get a passport–for that you need a certified short form.
He's shown a valid legal BC, but birther's just keep whining about “the long form, we wanna see the long form! Whaaaahhh!” Just what is it on the long form that you so want to see? Why does it matter how much he weighed? Or how many inches long he was? All the pertinent information is on the certified BC he's already shown.
Get over it.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:58 am
Certainly. In the words of Greg Costikyan, the modern usage of the word “LIberal” is synonymous with “milk-and-water socialist.”
Progressive (and “transnational progressive” or Tranzi), “Liberal,” fascist, communist, Maoist, Marxist, communard, populist – all of these are synonyms for or, at best, weasel-word substitutes for, socialism, a doctrine of political economic organization arising more or less simultaneously in Great Britain and in France in the first half of the 19th Century, and arriving in significant political force in these United States late in the second half of that same century.
The significant difference between socialism and the mercantilism of 18th Century Great Britain and Alexander Hamilton’s party (and the Whig “American System” of Henry Clay and Abraham Lincoln directly descending from Hamilton’s Federalists politically exterminated in the “Era of Good Feelings” after Jefferson’s election to the presidency) is that the excuse for government extortion in the marketplace under socialism is the supposed welfare of “the people” – either as a whole or, more commonly, particular interest groups thereof.
Under mercantilism, it was “the best people” – the self-appointed or hereditary aristocrats, the monetarily advantaged or politically connected or “Old Boy” networked minority – whom Hamilton wanted the central government of this nation to serve at the expense of the rabble.
Socialism passes off the illusion that socialist politicians are working for the rabble even as they line their patrons’ and their own pockets by robbing and enslaving that same rabble. Faction fighting in an economy crippled by government arm-twisting, back-stabbing, expropriation, corvée, penal servitude, hidden taxes, debt peonage, “regulation,” impediments to commerce, and so forth.
The environment of the corrupt Cook County machine “poverty pimp,” Barry Soetoro.
The socialist, knowing that almost two centuries of experience with socialism’s bloody, costly, catastrophic failures has made “socialism” a dirty word, tries to disguise his malignancies with other terms.
“Progressive” has apparently come back into fashion (it was common in the days of Saint Woodrow and his Palmer Raids), and stevie obviously likes this weasel-word. Thinks he can get away with it.
Well, stevie is not only a lawyer (and, as I’ve said, lies for a living) but he’s pretty obviously clinically insane. So…
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:00 pm
Post 2001? So that would have meant he was 40 years old at that point. Right? So when he was born in 1961 and if he was born in Hawaii, or if his foreign birth was registered there of if someone signed and affidavit saying he was born there, there would have been a complete form typed up for him and a number certificate of live birth issued to him. Where is it? Hawaiian officials say they have the original in their vault. Fork it over if it's there. I don't think it is there at all. I think the whole claim is bogus at this point. I'm waiting for someone to come forward with their Hawaiian birth certificate bearing that number. I'm surprised it hasn't already happened. Unless they chose that number because the real person with that number is dead. Another possibility. He is dirty. Something will come out to prove it. It is all closing in on him now. It will suck to be Barry.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:07 am
Now, now. “Zionist” does not mean someone who has painfully caught his penile frenulum in a zipper, though stevie behaves that way almost all the time.
And how could a Zionist ever want to make common cause with a supporter of a part-Arab individual who had been trained as a child to read and understand Arabic, and taught the Holy Qu’uran and the goodness of prayer in submission to Allah, the merciful, the compassionate?
Are not the Zionists and the Faithful at dagger’s point in this world?
Finally, we cannot be sure that Barry Soetoro’s Islamic faith is being concealed in order to advance the coming of the Caliphate (as a deception against the infidels of the Great Satan) or that he is – hateful! – an apostate who has truly abandoned the True Faith to take upon himself the heresies of the Nazrany error.
Surely, the fact that no fatwah has been issued against Barry Soetoro by any mullah or other competent Islamic authority is proof enough that Barry has not turned away from Allah and His Prophet, and is in fact a “secret Muslim” as good as any other enlisted in the great jihad against America.
All praise be to Allah, the merciful, the compassionate!
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:07 pm
That's the kind of straight-jacket, padded-room, batshit insane, Arkham Asylum type crazy that I was talking about. I thank you for not disappointing me. Well done.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:13 pm
Thank you for your courteous reply. I admit, it would be very difficult to get the records produced under any circumstances at this point. It has all, for the most part been hermetically sealed. Still, you have to wonder why the Obama administration wouldn't just rather release everything if there is not something damaging in his personal records. This refusal of him to do so is undermining his presidency in a very damaging way. But I suppose it is entirely up to him in the final analysis so, there isn't much to do about it. I do strongly believe that the “birther” phenomenon will only grow stronger as a result of a continued refusal. Additionally, there may be people out there who have made and kept copies of things about him and will be coming forward from time to time with them. It just won't go away. Only Obama himself can stop or at least reduce it back to an internet rumor level.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:37 pm
You can think what you like, but your beliefs are not only lacking any evidence to back them up, but they also ignore the evidence which contradicts them. Your paranoia is irrational and typical of birthers.
Essentially what you're saying is you reject the evidence he's already shown (more than any prior President) and you believe all these nutball conspiracy theories. Yet you want him to show even more evidence? When you've already shown you won't accept any amount of evidence?
Why would he do that? It's not a good idea for the President of the United States to capitulate to nutjobs throwing irrational tantrums, and that's exactly what's happening here.
BTW, if his foreign birth was registered in Hi. it would list his actual birthplace, not Honolulu. If he was born at home and a relative signed an affidavit that's also plenty good enough considering his mother and father were living in Hi. at the time of his birth. This theory that he was really born in Kenya is completely without any substantiation other than rabid paranoia and wishful thinking.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:42 pm
What? The part about how Obama would rather go on having to deal with this if he actually has a legitimate right to be where he sits, but refuses to produce a $10 piece of paper to prove it? Yes Steve, I must agree with you on that. That is pretty batshit crazy alright!
What is the reason why he won't produce the original? Because Hawaii won't allow it or because their copy machine is broken? They couldn't just put it loan to the Library of Congress or something? They wouldn't allow a Swiss forensics team to just come in and look at it and photograph it and then report on its authenticity? This birther thing is preferable to showing a piece of paper? Sorry but it makes him look like he is lying about it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:44 pm
Actually it's not undermining his Presidency at all. If anything it is helping him by (fairly or not) making his political opponents look crazy by association with the birthers. That may be unfair to his less conspiracy addled opponents, but it is in fact the way it's playing out.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:49 pm
It's not just the recent “short-form” that's issued. Even though Hawaii has gone – very, very recently, apparently just in the past year – entirely to the supposed “convenience” of accepting the short-form Certification of Live Birth (COLB) in lieu of the full-format birth certificate, it's just as easy for most states to issue true and certified print-outs of the greater information contents of digitally archived “long-form” birth certificates, which are the legal records completed in the hospital (or by the responsible caregivers in home deliveries) at the time of parturition.
Given that it takes really no more effort to print out, sign, and impress a seal upon a full-format birth certificate than it does to create a “short-form” document like the COLB, it simply doesn't make sense not to provide the more complete type of informational certificate.
Hawaii's short-form Certification of Live Birth derives from the island state's long history of receiving immigrants from all over the world, and had been devised to provide these new citizens with an expedient equivalent of the usual and customary long-form birth certificate, and for no other purpose. Barry Soetoro's younger maternal half-sister, Mrs. Maya Soetoro-Ng is a good example of someone born in a foreign country – Indonesia – but resident in Hawaii, and who uses a Hawaii state COLB instead of a long-form birth certificate in self-identification and other legal matters.
Here in “the 21st Century,” there is really no reason why any state government would issue any sort of short-form computer print-out instead of the kinds of long-form signed and sealed birth certificates with which Americans all over the nation are familiar. As I'd said, one is as easy to produce and issue as the other.
The exception is in situations – such as that of Mrs. Maya Soetoro-Ng – where the information content associated with the long-form birth certificate is not available in state government computer archives. Situations in which the COLB is uttered on the basis of something like an attestation of an infant's circumstances – date, time, place of birth, and so forth – instead of a record fully completed by an attending physician, midwife, and/or nursing professional, endorsed and sealed by a registrar, countersigned by a parent or parents.
That sort of thing. Whatever is in the Hawaii state archives supporting the issue of her COLB, it is not a long-form birth certificate completed in a hospital in the state of Hawaii.
By extension, given that Barry Soetoro has presented only computer graphic images of what his handlers claim to have been a Hawaii COLB issued to him in 2007, and given that Mr. Soetoro has (puzzlingly) refused even to present this physical, print-on-paper COLB to any competent legal authority to secure validation of its contents, intactness, validity, and other characteristics, only an idiot unable to “join the 21st Century” could possibly conclude that these computer graphic images provide more than an illusion of “a valid legal BC.”
In the case of Barry Soetoro – currently passing himself off as “Barack Hussein Obama II” – what is desired of the examination of a true and complete reflection of the circumstances of his birth is nothing, more or less, than some trustworthy verification that he had been born in the city and state where he claims to have been born, thus supporting Mr. Soetoro's multiple signed attestations of his “natural born citizen” status and therefore his qualification to have run for election to, to take the oath of office for, and to exercise the powers of the U.S. presidency.
This informational requirement has not been provided by Mr. Soetoro, and as the question has been called, and as it is quite a reasonable request – a request to which millions of average American citizens respond every day, all over the nation, with certified and true copies of their birth certificates – there is reason to believe that Mr. Soetoro is evading response to this question for reasons strongly suspicious of criminal intent.
All the information shown on those computer graphic images of what Mr. Soetoro's partisans claim (but are unwilling ever to confirm) to be his unaltered and true Hawaii state COLB could be factitious. Falsified. If confirmation is ever to come, that physical, print-on-paper COLB must be surrendered to a judge or another officer of the legal system for verification.
That's what this “birther” issue hinges upon, and continued mendacity on the part of Obamaphiles won't make this go away.
Get over it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:50 pm
If he actually had a birth document saying he was born at home in Hawaii, he would have already shown it. So I don't believe he ever had such a document in his entire life. It will say Mombasa, Kenya if he has one. That is what the passport records hack job was all about. There was something in there about foreign birth and probably something about Indonesian citizenship. It was deleted and John O Brennan saw that information. That is why he is currently “Assistant to the President” on counter-terrorism. Nice job security there. Huh?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 9:52 pm
My guess is the reason why the Obama isn't doing anything to stop this is because he read Machiavelli: “Never interfere with the enemy when he is destroying himself.”
In a day and age where even Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, and the National Review are starting to mock the birther movement, it's becoming obvious that the birther movement is threatening to split the Republican party right down the middle. Republican Congressman and Senators are terrified to discuss the issue and Democrats know this, which is why they aren't doing anything to stop it.
There is a clip on Youtube of a Republican from Delaware who was confronted by a birther during a townhall meeting. When the Republican eventually told her that the president was in fact a natural born citizen and eligible to be president, he was booed by the audience. Democrats looked at that and laughed. Republicans saw it and cringed. (google “crazy eileen” for the full story)
These rumors have been going around for the past year, and Obama still won the election handily. This birther stuff doesn't worry me at all; this is nothing more than the 9/11 truther nonsense all over again, and that never got anywhere.
I have to say, it sure is great to have a discussion without all of the name calling. It's important to disagree without being disagreeable.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:00 am
Read the application:
http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/dhhl/applicants/applyhhl/
“Primary Documents
Birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth and Certifications of Live Birth) and Certificates of Hawaiian Birth are the primary documents used to determine native Hawaiian qualification.
The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts BOTH Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) AND Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth. The Certificate of Live Birth generally has more information which is useful for GENEALOGICAL purposes as compared to the Certification of Live Birth which is a computer-generated printout that provides specific details of a person’s birth. Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.”[emphasis in CAPS mine]
As you can plainly see and verify with the link. The additional information from the “long form” is not needed for establishing birth (the COLB does that as well), but for GENEALOGICAL purposes.
This is a common birther falsehood.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:01 pm
Again, you can believe whatever you want. You can ignore the evidence if you want. He has a valid legal birth certificate issued by the state of Hi. saying he was born in Honolulu Hi. on Aug. 4, 1961. It's no different from any other certified copies the state has issued since 2001. Just because he doesn't have any older copies doesn't invalidate, or even reasonably call into question, the valid legal copy he has provided.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:04 am
“Obamagoons?”
“Safe deposit boxes?”
“Swiss forensics team?”
What the hell…?
Since we actually found some common ground earlier, I’ll let this one slide.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:11 pm
Funny then that the MAJORITY of states issue a short form by preference, and many of those issue short forms exclusively. I already mentioned Pa. Mo. is another example of a state which does not even offer long forms any more.
Additionally, even for those that do still issue long forms, in most cases it's no longer a photocopy, but simply a computer printout with more information on it. The additional information on a long-form is useless for virtually all purposes (including this one) which require a BC.
You can deny all you want, but short forms are valid legal certified birth certificates for all purposes. They contain the required raised seal and are backed up by the state that issued them just exactly like the long form computer printouts and the older photocopies. The only difference is extraneous information has been removed.
Or to put it more simply–it's the seal that makes it valid, not whether or not it includes how much he weighed at birth.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:19 pm
And BTW, Maya does not have a BC stating she was born in Hi. issued by the state of Hi. That's one of those unsupported rumors that got spread around through right blogostan and which is now taken as an article of faith by birthers the nation over.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:23 pm
Go to the top of this thread and read what Tuci just posted and then just think about it for bit. And then somewhere up toward the top I posted some links to images showing what was issued for years in Hawaii to native born Hawaiians. Just a thought.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:24 pm
You know Steve, I actually agree with most of what you just said here. Especially the last part. Taitz and Eileen are both pretty goofy. I'm not a Republican or a Democrat but I can see that the Republicans are sorely divided on this and it is hurting them. Oh well, I guess it will eventually work itself out.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:34 pm
“Here in “the 21st Century,” there is really no reason why any state government would issue any sort of short-form computer print-out instead of the kinds of long-form signed and sealed birth certificates with which Americans all over the nation are familiar.”
And yet, they do it anyway.
Get over it.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:36 pm
“People who voted for him [President Obama] hates America!”
People who voted for President Obama hate ray1776 idea of America.
“Global Warming is a hoax!”
According to Leonard Weinstein. The majority of scientists believe global warming is real.
“If you voted for Obama your a very very ignorant person!”
Not a very scientific yardstick.
“The Hitler mantra of CHANGE was used in 1917 and Stalin used the same! Hope and Change is for real chumps!”
Hitler and Stalin were two very different people.
“Maybe people will wake up and use the brain God gave them…”
The same hope goes out for you.
“… instead of fighting right and left and start becomming Americans and Vote for Freedom and Justice for all!”
You don't represent your side very well.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:40 pm
Precisely. Thank you!
“'It’s crazy,' said Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health. 'I don’t think anything is ever going to satisfy them.'
Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are 'more like threats,' explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. 'If you were born in Bali, for example,' Okubo explained, 'you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.'”
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-…
Crazy, indeed. Stupid, too.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:44 pm
“If you voted for Obama your a very very ignorant person!” –ray1776
Make that ELEVEN birthers who don't know the difference between “your” and “you're.”
Seriously, do you people all ditch classes at the SAME elementary school? Are you all sitting in the same computer lab? Do you all come from the same broken home?
Because, birthers, it's an awe-inspiring coincidence that “your” all this stupid.
How does that make you feel? Talkative, I hope. Get out there and spread your disgruntled, unfounded, incoherent, badly-formulated message. On TV and YouTube. Please.
“You're” country needs you to do it. Especially the Democrats, Independents, and RINO's.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:46 pm
This supposition – that Barry Soetoro “had such a document [a birth certificate supporting his contention that he had been born in Honolulu] in his entire life” – is perfectly reasonable.
This is why the Obamaphiles – in their various presentations – have such a desperate need to brand “birthers” as kooks and fanatics, as “racists” and Republicans.
For much the same reason, recall, that our bankster-serving politicians and their running dogs in the drive-by media had to label Congressman Ron Paul a “kook” in 2007 when he spoke so presciently of the coming economic collapse and the roots of that collapse in the inflationary irresponsibilities of the Federal Reserve System.
As Dr. Paul no longer looks much like a “kook” since the present recession took it's strangling grip on the nation's and upon the world's economies, so too are the “birthers” hardly coming across as “kooks” – in spite of all the Obamaphiles' propaganda efforts – with regard to Barry Soetoro's increasingly obvious inability to produce tangible bona fides of his qualification to serve as President of these United States.
Other issues peripheral to Barry's inability to document his supposed Hawaiian birth – Kenyan or Indonesian or Tanzanian or even British citizenship, and so forth – are peripheral and inconsequential at this time, which is why the Obamaphiles tend to concentrate on such distractions.
What matters is Barry's burden of proof as to his place of birth. If he cannot provide the common kind of documentary support of his contention that millions upon millions of American citizens are called upon to do every day – simply showing his birth certificate to a competent legal authority – then the suspicion of fraudulence on his part has to be admitted, and can only grow.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:49 pm
Normally, I wouldn't have believed a single thing you said. Normally, I'd just mock you.
Your claims are outlandish and laughable.
Your websites are absurd. You misspelled “operation” in the first link. The middle link obviously takes you to a quackfuckery site that argues global warming is a hoax. The third link is written by people like Navigator 7 who say “you can have this country back when I'm done protecting it.”
You put a question mark on the end of a declarative statement about not voting for McCain. You may as well have written “I do not know what I'm talking about at all either?”
So, as I indicate, I would ordinarily just mock you and move on.
But every single one of your sentences, save the one where you misused a question mark, ends in an exclamation point!
You must be a fucking genius!
It's the most persuasive technique I've ever encountered!
I'm getting excited just thinking about it!
No, wait, I was thinking of Salma Hayek and Naomi Watts making chocolate chip cookies in my kitchen.
You're a funny guy, ray. Not credible or intelligent, but funny.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:51 pm
I already responded to Tuci, and as I already pointed out, those are pictures of what they were issuing in the 60's and 70's. The one Obama has shown is what they are issuing now.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:51 pm
Here is a link from a recent poster here, nbc1. http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/03/…
I agree with nbc1 that the original document shows
1. Evidence of the two folds
2. Evidence of the raised seal
3. Evidence of a date stamped on the back
As Orly Taitz, the birther lawyer stated there is no proof that President Obama can present that will change her mind. You cannot have a rational discussion with the irrational.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:53 pm
Tsk. Should've written never “had such a document…”
Again, it's not a matter of what you (or anyone else) might “believe,” but the plain fact that Barry Soetoro – alias “Barack Hussein Obama II” – has evaded reasonable requests that he submit to a judge or other competent officer of the court the physical, print-on-paper, signed and sealed Certification of Live Birth he claims to have been issued by the state of Hawaii in 2007.
By doing so, Barry would enable that court to secure evaluation of the COLB by qualified forensic documents examiners prepared to testify under oath as to its “genuineness or non-genuineness.”
Resolution of this matter is Barry's responsibility. Only he has the power – at present – to produce this paper document instead of foisting off computer graphic images purported to have been scanned therefrom. The burden of proof (as to his qualification to hold the office he present occupies) is upon him. Absent that proof, it can only be concluded that he is unqualified, that he knows he is unqualified (he's trained as a constitutional lawyer, after all), and that his motives for concealing the definitive information are entirely criminal.
Barry ha provided no “valid legal copy” of any documentary proof of birth anywhere in the world.
Don't you wish he would?
Well, no. Of course you don't.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:55 pm
Well, what the images show (or are purported to show) doesn't seem to matter, really.
What does the document itself show, jim?
Nobody knows. Barry Soetoro hasn't produced the document itself, and there's the rub.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 10:56 pm
Randwulf – “You cannot have a rational discussion with the irrational.”
Don't mean you personally, just birthers in general. Haven't read enough of your posts yet to come to a conclusion.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:06 pm
Perhaps only a lawyer – a person who lies for a living – would expect people to accept a contention to the effect that because Republicans contest elections against National Socialist (formerly “Democrat”) politicians, Republicans can be trusted to police their nominal opponents. Tsk. One hand washes the other. You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours. To get along, go along. All in the spirit of bipartisanship.
What about this usual-and-customary collusiveness is at variance with what every American citizen knows of the supposedly “rival” factions of the permanently incumbent Boot-On-Your-Neck Party, folks? How does one count upon a (nominally) Republican politician in an overwhelmingly National Socialist state – Hawaii – to police the probity of a decidedly National Socialist whore-in-office when that prostitute is the state's current most Favorite Son?
Does the expression “political suicide” ring a bell?
And little stevie expects you, dear reader, to accept his “if the Republicans are good with it, all the rest of us should be, too!” rantings and ravings.
So we're back to the document from which those computer graphic images were supposedly scanned in June 2008, and of which over the past 13 months and more we've had nothing from Barry Soetoro except megabuck expenditures (either in payment for or in a sort of donation-of-service Barry has gotten from expensive, high-powered legal firms all over these United States) to procedurally quash rather than substantively address some forty-plus “birther” lawsuits trying to get him to put down before a judge nothing more than his birth certificate.
His birth certificate. Short-form or long-form, but merely a physical legal document which you and I, dear reader, are expected to produce upon demand as a matter of routine.
And stevie thinks that anyone who asks this of his beloved Messiah as proof of Barry's dubious “qualification” to serve in the office he presently occupies as “deranged.”
Well, you know about people with stevie's constellation of mental disorders as well as his trained mendacity. The only thing reliable about him is his insanity.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:07 pm
Lol! No judhe has asked to see it, they've just dismissed frivolous lawsuits, as they should.
The FEC and the State Department have seen it though. But that's not good enough I suppose.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:11 pm
Oh, no. The Hawaii COLB issued to Mrs. Maya Soetoro-Ng places her birth in Jakarta (though it was spelled “Djakarta” in these United States at the time of her birth). Computer graphic images of her COLB have been published online, and if these images are to be believed, that's the information incorporated therein.
Who had said that her COLB stated that “she was born in [Hawaii]“?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:17 pm
Could you please list the states which “issue a short form by preference,” then? When this whole “birther” controversy began, the natural confusion with which the “short-form” Hawaii COLB was received had been because apparently the majority of Americans had been working with (and currently receiving) “long-form” true and verified print-outs of their birth certificates to present when self-identification had been required of them in legal proceedings.
If “the MAJORITY of states issue a short form by preference” is your contention, support of this assertion is a reasonable request, is it not?
And if “it's the seal that makes it [a documentary proof of live birth] valid,” then the provision of the document itself should resolve much of this brouhaha. Said a seal (and the signature accompanying it) as well as the other physical characteristics of a true and certified COLB can only be verified through the direct examination of the document itself.
The image of the thing – though nice to see – is not the thing itself.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:24 pm
Well, on “global warming” (or “global climate change”) despite the “majority” consensus – and, remember, science isn't done by consensus; look up Semmelweis – the allegation of anthropogenicity (that such change had been or is being caused by human actions impacting the global environment) appears to be mistaken. On the political side, there is definitely a strong “hoax” element. On the scientific side, there's merely flawed collection of data, incorrect interpretation of this information, very bad mathematical modeling, and irresponsible leaps to incorrect conclusions.
Common in the sciences, and one of the reasons why skepticism is a scientific virtue without which no field of inquiry can advance.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:31 pm
@Tuci78, there seems to be one fact you're overlooking: what do you make of the announcements in both Honolulu newspapers at the time of Obama's birth? Given that the newspapers have confirmed that they were simply reporting what the city's hospitals told them — and not, for example, what a parent personally asked the papers to write — doesn't that confirm beyond all doubt that he was born in Honolulu? I know you want to see an original document for completeness' sake, but don't the birth announcements essentially prove he was born in the U.S.?
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:37 pm
A judge amenable to Fancy Lawyer Tricks could reasonably be expected to sigh in relief and let this cup pass. Why not? Demanding of the highest elected officer of the land something that potent potentate obviously desperately does not want to produce is extremely dangerous for any judge.
“The Malevolent Jobholder” of civil government, in no matter what branch, must commonly be held to his duty by the citizenry because doing his duty is onerous, bothersome or – in this case especially – both difficult and hazardous. A firm of well-upholstered, well-paid, high-powered lawyers offering procedural escape could only be gratefully welcomed by any judge.
Curiously enough, neither the Federal Election Commission (FEC) nor the U.S. State Department seem to have the verification of a presidential candidate's qualification for office in their respective baliwicks. Or, at least, these “Malevolent Jobholder” individuals have been able to slough such responsibilities in this regard as they might lawfully be empowered and duty-bound to discharge.
Either for reasons of National Socialist political loyalty or simply self-preservation, their motives for these defalcations are obvious.
So it's only the people with little or nothing but time and effort to lose – private citizens – who have any real incentive or proclivity to press this matter, and there seems to be no abatement of their interest in poking and prodding and pestering Barry Soetoro until something along the “18-minutes' erasure” line forces a prosecutorial “Malevolent Jobholder” to groan and grimace and reluctantly do his public duty.
Fun to watch while it's happening, though. I was there to watch Nixon crash and burn. I'm really looking forward to Barry's destruction.
“I hope he fails.”
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:39 pm
Not to jump into your conversation but I have my own thought why President Obama doesn't do what he did around November 1, 2008 when he allowed FactCheck.org and some journalists to look, touch, examine and photograph the original birth certificate. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in…
President Obama is an analytical person. He though during the campaign that posting the COLB on his web site would end the rumors but instead it only fueled them. He had to learn from that misstep. Plus showing the original BC to factcheck.org and those journalists did little to put this to bed.
Today, if he allowed a group of journalists including Lou Dobbs and other doubters, then who know what would happen. If you just show it to fact check organization then the birthers would say they are a left wing group. Plus like any President, President Obama wants some control over the conversation. Talk about health care and other issues. Who knows where the media would take this and for how long. It would also give all the birther “experts” media time and seem to legitimize their argument to some degree.
Plus I agree with Steve X “Never interfere with the enemy when he is destroying himself.” Probably is another factor.
I think you cannot convince those who believe the Apollo lunar landings were falsified by the government or those who believe the government committed the 9/11 acts of terrorism against itself. You cannot present any evidence that will convince the hard core birther.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:51 pm
Look, we already know you're paranoid. You don't have to keep proving it.
And we already know that I think YOU are deranged. I'm not surprised you fail to understand that your situation is unique.
“His birth certificate. Short-form or long-form, but merely a physical legal document which you and I, dear reader, are expected to produce upon demand as a matter of routine.”
You are NOT expected to produce your long-form original birth certificate. EVER. Any government agency, any court of law, any official requirement that you produce evidence of your citizenship or birthplace, will accept a COLB.
Busted!
Paranoia is fun until you combine it with an utter lack of the ability to tell the truth. Wretch.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 11:54 pm
“facts?! we don't need no steenking facts!! we're (after)'birthers'! susie/tuci/darpot et al
seriously, msystyplx “…your beliefs are not only lacking any evidence to back them up, but they also ignore the evidence which contradicts them.” reasoning doesn't work on 'little brain' (after)'birthers'. save it. between what these fly-over fools are huffing and hate radio 6 hours a day, 'reasoning' would require a full metal jacket to have ANY impact.
on a lighter note, the nic, i thought, was a reference to an old Superman foil, 'Mr. Mxyzptlk'. close. thanks for the memories.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:08 am
Hey! You finally found a non X-rated photo of your gorillagirlfriend to use as an avatar! Nice going, randypuppy!
No need for you to be ashamed now that your secret is out.
So, it turns out your ability to evaluate the clarity and persuasiveness of anyone else's writing is no better than your ability to think or express yourself clearly.
What a surprise.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:11 am
Awesome! Now we have “some guy named Alan.” This exponentially increases the evidence supporting the birther claims. Before they just had a half-eaten breakfast.
Now we're getting somewhere. I'd better roll up my sleeves. Now that they have the Authority of Alan, I'll need to redouble my efforts.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:14 am
Hey Doc. This is one of the sources I based my conclusion on. I know you seen it but don’t recall you take although I know you don’t believe it is legit. The orginal BC was shown to FactCheck and journalists.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in…
FactCheck dismisses a lot of President Obama’s statement on Health Care Plan. This and other work makes me think FactCheck.org is nonpartisan.
http://www.factcheck.org/politics/obamas_health…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:15 am
Here's what's great about you.
You want Obama to get a copy of his birth certificate onto “Judge Souter's desk.”
Most people would correct you and say “Justice Souter.”
But I'll correct you and say “Souter.”
Because, see, randypuppy, Souter retired from the SCOTUS in June.
You had 9 names to pull out of your ass. YOU picked the one who's no longer a Justice.
Good going!
Oh, and the “so-called” President is called that because he's the President.
Chaps your ass, huh? That's ok. You can rub “Randypuppy's Red-Assed Baboon Medicated Salve” on it.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:17 am
Damn. I should have scrolled down before mocking randypuppysusiemonkey.
Should have known you'd beat me to the low-hanging fruit surrounding that panty-wearing primate.
Oh well, it was still fun to pile on.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:20 am
Kenneth – I have to call you on the comment you made on about msystyplx. I think you have the wrong guy. He backs up his posts.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:24 am
Hmmm. Very convincing. You thoroughly proved your paranoia. You did nothing to advance the absurd claims you baselessly continue to recite.
“It is all closing in on him now,” huh? Is that the Eye of Sauron you're looking into, randypuppy?
“It will suck to be Barry.” You mean for all those people who go by the same nickname the President used as a boy? Yeah, I can see where they'd get a bit jealous that they're not the President.
One thing's abundantly clear. It has sucked, presently sucks, and will continue to suck to be randypuppy.
How's that Civil War reenactment planning going? Oh and did you scrape up the cash to buy a bullet to kill us all with yet? Good thing you warned us not to “cross swords” with you. Otherwise I might not have noticed you at all.
Well, it would be hard not to notice a guy who continually wets himself in the process of yammering about nothing in particular.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:41 am
“This supposition – that Barry Soetoro “had such a document [a birth certificate supporting his contention that he had been born in Honolulu] in his entire life” – is perfectly reasonable.
This is why the Obamaphiles – in their various presentations – have such a desperate need to brand 'birthers' as kooks and fanatics, as 'racists' and Republicans.”
Wow. I agree with you, a little bit.
The supposition that he has a valid birth certificate indicating he was born in Hawai'i is indeed reasonable.
That's why you birthers, who refuse to accept what is reasonable because you prefer to believe what is absurd, are kooks, fanatics, racists, and Republicans.
Or some unsavory combination of the four, always including the middle two. Not all of you are kooks. Not all of you are Republican (but those of you who aren't Republican do pull the lever for the R party, if you bother to vote at all).
The affidavit you and randypuppy are going on about only applies to people who are a year old or older in Hawai'i but do not yet have a birth certificate. Obama got his birth certificate when he was four days old. Not applicable.
Even Jerome Corsi, writing for World Net Daily, understands this distinction. I could have pulled the actual law for you, but it's more fun to shove Jerome fucking Corsi at you two goobers:
“'On October 31st, 2008, officials in Hawaii released a statement that they had examined the birth certificate, but failed to declare whether it was a Live Birth Certificate generated by a hospital with signatures of the attending physician or a 'Late Birth' Certificate of Hawaiian Birth that could have been obtained (for a child) who is one year old or older after birth by a simple affirmation of a family member,' wrote investigator Jorge L. Baro, of Elite Legal Services in Florida.”
http://libertynewsradio.com/wire/news/2009/07/0…
Ok, got that? “Late Birth.” World Net Daily. Jerome “Obamaphile” Corsi.
You people are so stupid it's just amusing to watch you scramble and scramble to deny reality.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:42 am
Yeah you should've written that. But you didn't.
Because, see, like I keep telling you, you're stupid.
Did you “hear” that, wretch?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:44 am
jimpa, belay last. wasn't 'thumping' msystyplx, just pointing out that he was wasting his time. these guys aren't 'fit' for re-education. that would, by definition, require an 'education' to being with. and, that let's these 'huffers' out.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:44 am
Since this happened a long time ago and certainly if it was Obama's birth certificate and someone was afraid it would pop up at an embarrassing time, it would be very helpful to have a plausible cover. So now we have a dilemma, which one is the fake or is one a cover for a crime. If Obama really did this, he would be crazy not to have started damage control long ago with a fake to cast doubt on the facts, or not. Who knows at this point. The rich and powerful will remain rich and powerful and there will never be a “change” in that.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:46 am
I think the confusion came about when a reply that msystyplx meant to go to the birther ken was responding to was posted in reply to ken.
I agree with jimpa, in any event. And I think it's an honest mistake.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:49 am
Ok brother. I reread and understand. Been looking at the screen too long. On my way out for the night anyway.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:51 am
Ah shit I just got here. I have to leave already?
Oh wait. You're not me. I'm not you. Where the hell did I get that idea?
Oh yeah. That's what Private Joker darpot thinks. My bad. Have a good one, Jim. See you next time.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:57 am
Tsk. An HTML markup error, little stevie sucks in into the blender of his paranoia, and…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:03 am
Your posts tend to be full of those errors, lately, wretch.
(Is it really an error? You've been using bold, italic, and underlined font since you started posting here, but increasingly so lately…it's almost as if you're trying to talk louder to get attention as people start tuning you out!)
You're leaving out key words and thus changing the whole meaning of your post in unintentionally hilarious ways.
You also claim that something you wrote two hours previous was instead written “days and days ago.”
Are the synapses no longer firing cleanly? Need to sniff some more paint thinner to clear out the cobwebs?
After all, you didn't even finish that last sentence.
Gramps? I'm over here. What are you looking at? Gramps? You awake?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:04 am
Ah, yes. To a paranoid psychotic like little stevie, all his imagined persecutors are “after” him because they're paranoid in their interpretation of stevie's psychotic rants. How self-aggravating.
As for the expectation that one will present a true and verified (signed and sealed) computer print-out of one's “long-form” birth certificate when such is the information used to create the document the average citizen requests from the archives of the state in which one had been born….
Well, this is the sort of “long-form” birth certificate that circulates among these United States, and in lieu of which “short-form” legal documents such as Hawaii's COLB are prepared for those who lack real birth certificates on file in states' archives.
Not that this addresses the question – puzzling, bothersome, much avoided by little stevie and the other Obamaphiles – of why Barry Soetoro refuses to tender to a judge (or, hell, directly to his political enemies) even that physical, print-on-paper, signed and sealed 2007 COLB from which it is alleged that those computer graphic images had been scanned in June 2008.
As always, the images of such a document are not the document itself.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:07 am
Oh, why didn't you ask me before? Obama refuses to release the document because he does not have to release the document.
Besides, it is politically-advantageous for the President and his political party if you birthers continue your stark raving insanity. It makes his political opponents, even those who disagree on policy rather than skin color, look like they're as nutty as you.
Why in the world would he ever want to kill the goose that lays so many golden eggs?
Tsk.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:13 am
The microfiche archives of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin and the Sunday Advertiser do not themselves suffice as qualitative proof for a number of reasons, not least of which is the reasonable and reasoned appreciation of differences in fonts and kerning found exclusively within the section detailing Ms. Dunham's blessed events and strangely absent notification of Mrs. Nordyke's twin delivery in the very same hospital a day before it is claimed that little Barry had been grunted out into the daylight.
Microfiche records – particularly in view of Mr. Soetoro's announcement of his intentions to pursue the presidency in 2004 – can easily be falsified well in advance. Extract one page from a known archive, make alterations, and then reproduce that microfiche page many times. Go to all other known archives, extract the original microfiche page, and substitute the falsified ones.
For these reasons, those microfiche archives are the very weakest sort of “evidence” for Barry Soetoro's contention that he had been born in Honolulu. Far stronger evidence is found in an item like the physical document – the 2007 COLB – from which it is alleged that the computer graphic images of June 2008 had been scanned.
Rather than squealing about the microfiche archives of two small-town newspapers, why not put that physical document into the hands of a panel of competent forensic documents examiners and secure from them sworn attestations as to their professional opinions of that document's provenance, intactness, and overall “genuineness or non-genuineness”?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:23 am
Well, a link to the Wikipedia page on Ignatz Semmelweis is hardly a big deal.
I remember Semmelweis as the example of his efforts to address childbed fever (postpartum sepsis) were highlighted both in Obstetrics classes and in History of Medicine. He's the poster child (if you'll pardon the expression) for evidence-based medicine (EBM), and used as a teaching case history when it comes to lessons about how those condemned as “crackpots” today – because they go against the grain and “threaten” the powers-that-be and their business-as-usual attitudes – must always be received with an open but responsibly skeptical mind.
I've lived long enough to see major “crackpot” ideas go right into therapeutic guidelines as standard-of-care medical management, and a great many uncritically accepted “S.O.P.” stuff permanently and irrevocably discarded. Look into the changes in advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACLS) over the past thirty or forty years for some of the most remarkable examples along these lines.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:26 am
No. That was the claim, but it was always baseless. The confusion comes merely from the fact that this is a changing trend and many people (who've had their birth certificates for a while) assumed it wasn't a valid BC if it wasn't a photocopy of the original. But even those are a minority–you do know birthers are a small minority? If you're contention was accurate there'd be a lot more people questioning his BC.
I don't have a full list of states, but from–
http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf
We have this, “In addition, survey respondents report that, in 20 States, local entities issue full photocopies of actual birth records, 16 States’ local entities issue certified copies from computerized abstracts, 17 States’ local entities issue wallet-sized certificates, and 4 States’ local entities can issue commemorative birth certificates.”
Even that is misleading as there are something like 6,000 separate entities that issue birth certificates and in most states it depends on the county what kind of certificate you get.
And the document has been examined and the Hi. DOH has repeatedly verified they do have his original on file and he was in fact born in Honolulu.
The image of the thing, unfortunately for you, is all you're going to get to see.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:35 am
“Well, this is the sort of “long-form” birth certificate that circulates among these United States, and in lieu of which “short-form” legal documents such as Hawaii's COLB are prepared for those who lack real birth certificates on file in states' archives.”
You can't get a birth certificate in Hi. (or any other state) saying you were born in the state, without producing evidence that you were actually born in the state. In some cases, (like with home births) this can be an affidavit, but that's certainly good enough for cases where the parents were residents of the state at the time of birth, and there's the baby… would you like them to require video tape or something?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:37 am
And as always you don't get to touch and handle the document itself. All your going to get is an image on the computer and the verification from the Hi. DOH. If that's not good enough for you then nothing ever will be.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:42 am
We cannot say with any surety that Barry Soetoro had been born in Kenya.
First, the city of Mombasa was in Zanzibar (now Tanzania) at the time of Barry's birth. It wound up in Kenya – Mr. Soetoro's 57th state of these United States – only some years after Ms. Dunham had grunted him out in the Maternity Ward of Coast Provincial General Hospital.
Second, lacking any sort of true and certified vital statistics document reliably attesting to Barry Soetoro's place of birth, we are no more certain that he had been born in Mombasa than in Honolulu. For all we know, Ms. Dunham could've precipitated her delivery in any country, anywhere in the world. Mombasa is merely the most probable venue of her blessed event.
Third, though Mr. Soetoro most certainly features in his administration many of the qualities of tyranny listed in the “indictment” section of our Declaration of Independence (1776), he is not unique in our recent sordid presidential history, which is replete with “abuses and usurpations” of unconstitutional powers dating back to the infamous American equivalent of Stalin, one Abraham Lincoln, the greatest single murderer of American citizens in the history of our country.
Barry's not quite that bad. Close, but not quite. Given time, I'm confident he'll get there.
This is why Barry Soetoro should not be given time. This question of his place of birth – and his qualification as a “natural born citizen” to occupy the White House – offers the opportunity to (and I love saying this about a lawyer, I really do) get him thrown out on a technicality.
How nice. Almost as good as standing him up before a wall and shooting him to death by musketry, but at my age I've learned to settle for less than perfect outcomes.
And Crash Test Johnnie (John McCain, “the Enemy Ace,” a former naval aviator who was personally responsible for permanently removing five tail numbers from the BuAer inventory in the course of his career) was nominated for the explicit purpose of “throwing” the 2008 presidential election. The concept of “shit scraping” (analogous to scraping manure off one's boots) applies. The leaders of the Republican Party, fully aware that the downside of their inflation-created “business cycle” was crashing upon the nation, and they wanted to make sure that the horrors of the next few years wore a big, bright, blue “D” all over them.
So you were given a choice last November between cholera and bowel cancer.
Most Americans – hoping rather stupidly for “Change” – picked bowel cancer.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:47 am
I know ;) I'm not arguing with the birthers, I'm setting the record straight for those who may not know much about this and are thus at risk of being taken in by the birthers.
I wouldn't change the birthers minds in a million years, even if I could. I have a great deal of faith, though, that nothing I, or anyone, can say will have any effect on them. If the BC doesn't faze them, and the newspaper announcements, and verifications by Republican officials in the state of Hi., and interviews with neighbors who remember him being born, and the sheer absurdity of the notion that Stanley Ann Dunham, 18 years old and 9 months pregnant, got on a 48 hour plane flight in order to have her baby in Kenya then within 4 days was back in Hi. with an undocumented black newborn… well, it's safe. They won't listen no matter what.
BTW, “Mystylplx” was my poor recollection of how “Mxyzptlk” was spelled. When I checked how it was actually spelled I decided I liked mystylplx better–it's at least pronounceable. mis-tull-plix.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:55 am
When you run out, ask von Einstein for some of his stash… He’s the one who wrote that HE “kept on smokin that shit.” He didn’t tell you to do anything.
That, or he’s just too stupid to know the difference between the word keep and the word kept.
Judging by past performance, I’m undecided, actually, as to whether it was an accidental typo or an on purpose admission where he just left out the word “I” before “kept.”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:13 am
Oh, I don't want “to touch and handle the document itself” (though it's kinda funny, isn't it, that Barry had one of his flunkies run “the document itself” over to the office of FactCheck for them “to touch and handle,” and didn't mind that at all?).
If all anybody is “going to get is an image on the computer” and unsworn vague possibly criminal attestations from Hawaii state government bureaucrats, then it's perfectly obvious that Barry is stonewalling for no reason other than that he's terrified of what an honest disputant – especially one of his millions of political enemies – will find when they “get to touch” the 2007 COLB which was ostensibly used to generate those computer graphic images.
Thanks for the confirmation, Obamaphile. You get that straight from Messiah Central, or just blowing it out your own personal ass?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:15 am
“Mrs. Maya Soetoro-Ng is a good example of someone born in a foreign country – Indonesia – but resident in Hawaii, and who uses a Hawaii state COLB instead of a long-form birth certificate in self-identification and other legal matters.”–tuci
Prove it! Supply legitimate links to back up that whopper!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:18 am
“The exception is in situations – such as that of Mrs. Maya Soetoro-Ng – where the information content associated with the long-form birth certificate is not available in state government computer archives. Situations in which the COLB is uttered on the basis of something like an attestation of an infant's circumstances – date, time, place of birth, and so forth – instead of a record fully completed by an attending physician, midwife, and/or nursing professional, endorsed and sealed by a registrar, countersigned by a parent or parents.”–Tuci
Lol. That law did not even exist in 1961. You are referring to a 1982 law.
You birthers are idiots.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:19 am
Any response yet, Obamaphile, as to a listing of that “MAJORITY of states [which] issue a short form by preference”?
I'd asked you to specifically enumerate those states which you claim “issue a short form by preference.” You need to support that assertion with factual back-up.
And of Hawaii's COLB, there's only computer graphic images in which we read a supposed attestation that Barry had been “born in the state.”
The image of the document is not the document itself.
Images can be easily falsified. Legal documents issued by state governments are more reliable. So obviously the proper verification comes only with direct physical examination of that COLB itself.
Would you like me to break that down into words of one syllable each, come over to your mother's basement, and beat each one of those words into your skull with a nine-iron? I've got an old one around here I don't even use as a spare anymore, and I could certainly use the exercise….
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:20 am
First, I am sending a Tsunami to Hawaii to wash away the corruption, if that doesn't work then I will burn it with lava from a volcanic eruption… thus says the Lord Zarkoz
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:25 am
Okay, so we can add another forgery to the long list of things birthers claim are false. The microfiche for two papers. The conspiracy is growing every day.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:29 am
Oh yes. Perfectly obvious. Considering that he's already proven, beyond what any past President has even been asked to do, that he's a natural born US citizen, I'd say that obviously proves he's hiding something. Unless he proves it even more. And more. And more. ad naseum.
Because we all know how all previous US Presidents have been required to submit their birth certificates to inspection by the masses merely to prove what everyone with a sense of reality already knows–that he was born in America.
Isn't it funny how birthers keep arguing that he should just give his BC up for inspection by (yet more) qualified authorities in order to “make this go away?” Yet the whole “this” we are talking about (birther paranoid fantasies) is not required to submit one tiny shred of evidence that they are even worthy of the overblown attention the media has already given them?
Why? Tuci, is the standard of proof being set so much higher for this particular President? Why the baseless demands for more and more proof when he's already gone past what any previous President has been asked to provide?
Ask yourself that. His parents were living in Hi. at the time of his birth. He's shown a valid, legal birth certificate from Hi. THAT alone should be enough, and for any other President WOULD be enough.
And it's MORE than enough for most Americans. Just a few very vocal whackos who won't accept that a black man is eligible to be President of the United States. We've made progress.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:34 am
Gettin a little puffed up, huh Tuci?
Sorry if the truth threatens your belief system. I know wars have been started over less, but why don't you put the nine iron away and try stuff like logic, facts, and intelligence instead.
Oh wait, it's because you don't have any of those on your side.
Sorry, well, if you're gonna use the nine iron you're gonna have to find me first!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:41 am
Sure. The Newark Examiner had a news item on the subject some months ago.
Like a great many other foreign-born residents of Hawaii. the state's practice of issuing “short-form” COLB documents on the strength of parents' attestations is a great convenience, and she had naturally taken advantage of it.
In my own area of the country, I've found that parents who had adopted children from foreign countries secure such “short-form” substitutes for birth certificates in order to enroll their kids in school and undertake such other routine tasks.
And why do you conceive this reasonable observation to be a “whopper,” Rat-boy? What the hell else is Mrs. Soetoro-Ng supposed to use instead of a birth certificate? She was born in Djakarta (now spelled “Jakarta”), Indonesia.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:43 am
I doubt that it’s as simple as the Obamaphiles being “closed minded.”
There is on their part an obviously deliberate effort to lend their Messiah “cover” in online fora like this one, largely as self-appointed thugs pressing “talking points” retailed to them by like-minded partisans of our Marxist Mahdi.
The are definitely True Believers (in Eric Hoffer’s sense) but they fully understand both the nature of Barry Soetoro and the reasons why persistent demands that this Cook County machine “poverty pimp” provide a true and certified legal document supporting his contention that he is a “natural born citizen” and therefore qualified to hold the office of President of these United States must result in his removal from that office.
The Obamaphiles know that Barry is not a “natural born citizen.” They’re absolutely frantic to keep the certainty of that knowledge from becoming prevalent in the general population because they want Barry to continue in office, and accomplish the socialist paradise-on-earth (and the utter destruction of the American economy and America’s political identity as a constitutional republic) that is Barry’s objective.
So they’re not “closed minded” at all. They simply can’t admit the facts of the matter. The facts would – ideally – land their Messiah in Leavenworth for the rest of his miserable life, and they’d be shit outta luck (SOL) insofar as their own malignant hopes and dreams and aspirations go.
Not hard to understand.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:47 am
Hm? Just what has Barry “proven” with regard to his “natural born citizen” qualification to occupy the presidency? You and your fellow fellahin keep repeating this idiot assertion as if your chanting will cause reality to crystallize out of the aether according to your prevaricatory will, but no proof is – well, no proof. As in “nobody believes you any more.” As in “put up or turn it over to Joe Biden, and may God have mercy on the nation.”
The image of a thing – like that COLB document – is not the thing itself.
If Barry has “a valid, legal birth certificate from [Hawaii}” – and those images seem to indicate that he does – then all Barry has to do is produce that “valid, legal birth certificate,” hand it to a judge, and say:
“There you are, your honor. No, I don't really need it back when you're done with it. I can get another quite easily from Honolulu.”
And that's about it. So what the hell are you Obamaphile assholes making such a fuss about?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:51 am
Oh, not just because the arrogant narcissistic personality disorder case “won’t release his original birth certificate.”
After all, there’s so much about Barry Soetoro to hate, stevie. His socialism, his obvious hatred of America, his bankster cronyism, his allegiance to organized labor, his commitment to turning the U.S. dollar into toilet paper, his groveling before Arab princelings, his obvious contempt for the average working American….
But the “birth certificate” business does bring into wonderful relief the essence of what makes Barry exceptional among American presidents, and how he conceives himself to be privileged above his countrymen, immune to even the most reasonable of their demands – “Show your birth certificate” – a demand that is made upon us mere citizens every day in every state and territory and District all over this land.
How could one not hate him?
It has everything to do with “what he has done [and] hasn’t done.”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:59 am
Nah. As I said, I need the exercise. And it's not as if whaling away on your rostral knob could possibly result in damage done to anything functional or of value.
You Obamaphiles and your belief system. How the truth threatens you….
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:05 am
He's shown his birth certificate. That's already more than most Presidents are required to do. His mother and father lived in Hi. at the time of his birth. They were living there when he was born… you do the math. There are birth announcements from the local papers from the time he was born. You do the math.
But no. It's still not good enough. It's far more than any prior President has been asked for but for this one it's still not good enough.
No, you think he was born in Kenya. You don't have the foggiest sliver of a hint of evidence to back that up, but it's still what you believe.
Yet somehow you think that your persistent inability to face facts implies some kind of requirement on the President of the United States to cater to your lunacy and keep proving it more and more and more and…
And if he fails to do so you take that as further evidence that your utterly baseless nutjob conspiracy theories MUST be right! After all, if there was nothing to it he would be paying a lot more attention to you, and capitulating to all your demands! Right?
Lol! He's ignoring you so that proves you right. If he didn't ignore you then THAT would prove you right. If he sings in the shower you'd find away to say that THAT proves you right. If he files motions to dismiss in frivolous lawsuits then that proves you right. If those motions are granted by judges then THAT proves you right. No matter what you'll find some way to say it proves you right.
But what you really want is to get everyone else to join you in your fantasy world. Sorry. That's never going to happen. Grow up. Get over it. Or don't…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:08 am
http://www.operationtyranny.com
To all the brainwashed obamaniacs. Obama is a liberal secular progressive and he has lied about being the anti war president. He thinks his plan to remake America will work? He is sadly mistaken the people are waking up in droves and will stop his commy agenda!
If you call people a racist that disagree then you are a f#ckwad! I am black and I am tired of being treated like a welfare case! Black people have relied on welfare and socialism (Food Stamps welfare and hand outs) This is disgusting! Obama is not black! I know white folk blacker then Obama who actually work for a living! Obama is nothing more then a liar and a tyrant! He wants social health care! Global warming is a hoax! Al Gore is a con man! Scientists that once agreed with Al Gore changed their opinion! It is not fact it is simply an opinion by some fringe left wing maniacs. I hated Bush also because he was a war monger and a liar also!
I have read the constitution and it sounds perfect if followed! Why cannot the government follow it?
POWER grab and that is it! Obama is no friend of the people but if you wan to be a fool then it is your right! Millions of fools voted for Obama out of white guilt and the sick religion of feel good or better then others mentality! The left has no focus on reality and neither does the right.
I do not support either but I know Obama and his cronies are simply wrong for America!
Obama was born in Kenya simple as that! If you resort to calling me names that is because know I am right and you must attack the messenger because the message is to much truth!
Obama is a nasty liar and I hope someone changes him and shows him the error of his ways!
I have been black for 40yrs and Obama was only black for 2yrs to fool you stupid white people into voting for him! White guilt is a real bitch! The PC crap is a violation of freedom of speech!
I have never been to Africa and hate the African American crap! The hell with Africa I am an American and proud of it! I happen to be black but an American first! The way it should be!
http://www.bondaction.org is my site!
Please feel free to visit and remember Obama is half white and he hates white people!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:15 am
Interesting “up is down” inversion there, stevie.
Let's see… Barry Soetoro is encountering hellacious resistance to his Obamacare effort to nationally socialize something like 17% (on NPR I heard yesterday some commentator say “20%”) of the nation's GDP. Even among his legislative supporters, there is growing determination to impose a regular practice of subjecting the Federal Reserve System to Congressional audit (something neither Barry nor the National Socialist Party leadership want at all). Barry's “economic stimulus” plans are being met with growing rage, resentment, and resistance. His “tax and rape” so-called environmentally friendly attack upon the energy sector got through, but promises to meet continued opposition and attack aimed at rolling it back. His takeover of Chrysler and GM attracts hateful attention he cannot escape.
Yes, I can see why Barry would find the “birther” thing ever so “politically-advantageous,” to enroll thousands (even millions) more Americans in the ranks of the aroused and enraged who hate him utterly, and want to drag him down.
All across America – grassroots or AstroTurf – Barry's National Socialist Party colleagues in the Congress are getting their ears blown off in “townhall meetings” where the crowds are calling for blood, and I'm just wonderfully certain that adding the cry “Where's the birth certificate?” to “Read the bill!” and “Keep your hands off my healthcare!” is so much to Barry Soetoro's political advantage.
Yep. Gotta go with you on that one, little stevie. This is just the way your Mombasa Messiah wants things right now.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:17 am
Yep. Remember that line in the Declaration of Independence that speaks about “a long chain of abuses and usurpations,” Rat-boy?
You figure that in the space of no less than four years – since 2004 – Barry Soetoro and his handlers couldn't put together something at least as snugly machined as, say, Operation Mincemeat?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:27 am
And, unfortunately for Barry, the image of his alleged COLB just isn't enough to prove that he qualifies as a “natural born citizen,” meaning that with nothing more than those computer graphic images, more and more Americans are going to arrive at the conclusion that Barry isn't so qualified, and is in fact criminally usurping the powers and prerogatives of an office he knows he is in not lawfully permitted to hold.
And come to think of it, those birth certificates I've got in my files were issued by the county in which I'd been born, not by the state.
Thank you for your information. There is much in that report which your fellow Obamaphiles would profit by were your purposes not to give “cover” to a Messiah who is lying as much to you as to the honest people of this nation.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:31 am
Hahahahahahahah!! ROFL!
You are an idiot. You will not take the oficial statement of an official from Hawaii, but you cite some douchebag's unsourced opinion as your source?
You would have been smarter just to admit the truth that you did not have a “legitimate link” and quit while you were ahead.
Wow. That is a keeper indeed.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:37 am
Not enough to prove it to you, but we've already established that. Confirmations by the Hi. DOH and birth announcements in the papers are also not enough for you. I think we've established that nothing will ever be enough for you. The mere fact his parents were living in Hi. when he was born is not enough for you.
If Jesus Christ himself tapped you on the shoulder and said, “Hey! Dipshit! He was born in Hi.!” It would not be enough for you.
Tell me again why he should keep trying to prove it to you?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:38 am
“What the hell else is Mrs. Soetoro-Ng supposed to use instead of a birth certificate?”–Tuci
The answer as noted above is that you are a complete moron. Maya Soetero has a birth certificate which you already mentioned she was born in Indonesia. You think they don't have birth certificates in Indonesia?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 8:41 am
Sure. Just feeping creaturism, coupled with the usual and customary arthritic changes. Had some surgery on my arm over the past year or so, and between decades of writing progress notes and orders (electronic medical records are creeping in, but slowly and at great expense), the first three fingers of my dominant hand seemed to have grown into a hoof.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:59 am
The idea that you think thousands or millions of people hate Obama because he won't release his original birth certificate is just one in a series of stupid ideas from you, wretch.
If indeed those people hate him, it has nothing to do with what he has done or hasn't done.
It has to do with them being racist idiots.
Keep pissing into the wind. I'll still mock you, dumbass. Don't worry.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:03 am
You're not black. You lie worse than you write. And that's saying something.
“liberal secular progressive?”
Oh, right, because the President is supposed to pass a religious test for office. My bad. I keep forgetting that today is opposite day. We're supposed to disregard the parts of the Constitution we don't like, including the one that says there shall be absolutely no religious tests for office.
Don't waste that shining intellect on us liberals, ray1776.
Take your talent to the Big Apple. Go tour the networks, sharing with them your brilliant deductions about Obama's true character.
But first learn to spell. It's not “commy,” stupid.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:04 am
well the “birthers”and the “hiders” are going to get what's coming to them and that's a bill from a senator from Havaii, who is going to pass that will show Barrack or Barry whatever name he has,his birth certificate so we can end this mess once and for all.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:04 am
No. Florida Christian always has a point. Lord Zarkos just has decent weed.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:08 am
birthplace,birthplace,birthplace, that's what is not being shown on his BC,which would show up on his longform,GET WITH THE PROGRAM…..CAPICH?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:11 am
well said I agree,but the “hiders” don't look at it that way.Ther closed minded,that's why.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:14 am
I agree with nearly everything you wrote. Except that I do think what you/I/we write can have an effect on the birthers. It just won't change their mind. But that's not my goal anyway.
I couldn't care less what birthers think. Fuck 'em. They're birthers. Disingenuous, weak-minded bigots, every last one of them. I've proven that fifty times in the past two weeks if I've proven it once. That's why they get so upset and accuse me of being a paid Obot blogger, or accuse me of being multiple people posting at once. They just don't like having their noses rubbed in their own shit.
I post here for three reasons.
First and foremost, to set the record straight for anyone who cruises through here trying to get answers to legitimate questions.
Second, to point out the absurdity of the pretzel logic and delusion practiced by birthers various and sundry. This is sort of a subset of reason one, except that I derive great joy from pointing out arrogant stupidity, so it isn't purely humanitarian motives that compel me.
Third, to mock those who set out to be cruel, hateful, divisive, racist, and un-American just because they cannot abide the idea that a black guy could get 69 million votes. They know he will get 70 million or more in 2012.
My hope is that I will encourage as many birthers as possible to proclaim their beliefs on YouTube or, better yet, television news.
I cannot think of a better way to ensure Democratic landslides.
Oh, and a fourth reason. I cannot stand the jerks like Tuci78 who make death threats against our President, so anything I can do to harass and annoy such “people” is well worth the effort.
See you around the threads. Anyone who likes Superman is one step ahead, in my book.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:14 am
you “hiders” are retarded because even his grandmother was interviewed and she said he was happy to be BACK TO HIS ROOTS! which is in KENYA,NOT HAVAII !
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:18 am
Can you post a link to this information, please?
I am aware of the recent House resolution recognizing Hawai'i's 50th anniversary, and, inter alia, confirming that Obama was born in Hawai'i.
But I haven't heard of this potential Senate bill. Which Hawai'ian Senator is sponsoring the legislation?
Your inability to spell the President's first name, coupled with your derogatory decision to refer to him by his first name, weighs against your credibility. But for now I'll humor you.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. But nothing short of President Obama never having been born, or all the birther lemmings following Orly Taitz off a cliff, will “end this mess once and for all.” Let's not kid ourselves.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:26 am
Hey, Barry had to be born somewhere. If not in Honolulu, why not Zanzibar (it wasn't Kenya in 1961)?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:26 am
:)
Interesting thought. We CAN have an effect on the birthers–we can get them even MORE riled up and even crazier than they already are!
I like it! Sorta like throwing fuel on the flame… burn birthers burn!
Too bad none of them are smart enough to stop even after having read this….
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:28 am
Oh for fuck's sake.
First, the COLB does indeed state his birthplace. Honolulu, Hawai'i. If you're going to make up gibberish, try harder.
Second, if you're going to talk down to other people, and especially if you try to do it in a foreign tongue, get your shit together. There is no such word as “CAPICH.”
Capiche?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:28 am
First thing first your wrong,He not black,he's biracial Capich? white mama,black dady=biracial so now I'm rubbing your nose in your own shit! 2) Orly Taitz has now won her first case against Mr.Obamamanure, and how's that,you may ask well Maj.Gen.Frederick Cook was suppose to be deployed to afganistan on July 9,2009 and refused,that's right he refused because the commander of failure has not provided to the american people he he is ALL of his records have been under seal and why? Birth,medical,schools,passport,and why.Well Mr. Cook had his orders revoked ! +1 for the birthers 0 for the” hiders”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:29 am
Y'know, sometimes I can't tell if people who write that way are actual birthers or just people making fun of birthers. That doesn't really bode well for the movement, if you ask me.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:30 am
Well, Barry is certainly a socialist. Third-generation “red diaper baby.” But is he a secular humanist or just a secret Muslim masquerading as a gawd-shouting low-church Protestant? Hard to tell.
After all, he's a lawyer. A Harvard-trained professional liar.
And, yeah, he's about as “authentically black” as Donnie and Marie (you never knew that about them, didja?).
Er, couldn't you be American and amused by the spectacle? Lately, I haven't seen much in this country of which I could honestly say I'm all that proud….
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:32 am
“Ther closed minded,that's why.”
Wow. Impeccable logic, forcefully presented.
Just one problem. “Hiders” don't believe in conspiracy theories. “Ther” not stupid, as birthers evidently are.
Put down the bottle. Pick up a dictionary.
But by all means, don't quit. Don't back down. Don't just post here. Get your message out there. Use YouTube. Get your face on the news. Bring a ziplock-bagged birth certificate. It's crucial that it be in a ziplock bag. You don't want to spill pudding on it again.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:32 am
the closed minded “hiders” will be burning now, HeHeHEHeHeHeHeHeHe !
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:36 am
Nobody has come up to the plate as a witness to his birth in Havaii,..Capich? That's the reason they want the long form,because his grandmother said she was at his birth in kenya,and there was a minister there who witnessed it also.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:37 am
Anyone who thinks Hawai'i has a “v” in it should not go around calling people retarded.
Besides, you're plainly wrong. You don't have to look further than this very website to find that out…
From “The Sarah Obama Myth” as reported by David Weigel:
“I’ve addressed the rumor that one of President Obama’s African relatives 'was there' when Obama was born before, most recently in my story today, but Alex Koppelman has a good take-out in Salon. G. Gordon Liddy has repeatedly said Obama was 'born in the Kenyan slums' because of a doctored audio tape.
'What Liddy was referring to is actually an affidavit filed by a street preacher named Ron McRae, who conducted an interview with Sarah Obama, the second wife of President Obama’s grandfather, through a translator. (Sarah Obama is not the president’s biological grandmother, but he calls her “Granny Sarah.”)
In that interview, Sarah Obama does in fact say at one point that she was there for her grandson’s birth. But that was a mistake, a confusion in translation. As soon as a jubilant McRae began to press her for further details about her grandson being born in Kenya, the family realized the mistake and corrected him. And corrected him. And corrected him.'
This has been one of the most pervasive Obama myths, and because none of the citizenship lawsuits get trial, the ‘birthers’ believe it’s never been disproven. It’s quite telling.”
http://washingtonindependent.com/52519/the-sara…
Got that? A doctored audio tape. Sarah Obama was talking about the President's father, who has the exact same name.
But don't take my word, or David Weigel's, for it. You're RIGHT. You feel it. You know it. You taste it. HOW could you be wrong? Get out there and shout it out! Godspeed!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:37 am
the 2 hospitals in Havaii don't have any records he was born there.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:38 am
If you ever encounter test-taker telling the truth, please wake me up.
And then slap me for dreaming something so outlandish.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:40 am
capich means STOP BEING CLOSED MINDED AND START THINKING WITH WITH AN OPEN MIND you'll get places in life,CAPICH?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:43 am
“then it's perfectly obvious that Barry is stonewalling for no reason other than that he's terrified of what an honest disputant”
Please tell me that you believe this in your heart of shit-pumping hearts.
Please tell me it's not just more in an never-ending stream of absurd hyperbole that you resort to slinging out there because nothing has yet sunk in with the rest of the world.
I would really enjoy knowing that you're really this stupid, and it's not all just an act that would put PontiusPilate TEWS_Fuckwit to shame.
“vague possibly criminal attestations…” LMAO. You're really not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?
There's no law against a Hawai'ian official confirming that the records exist, or that they conform to the publicly-available information in the COLB.
There's a law against RELEASING those records to the public, or allowing the public to inspect them.
Which, of course, is what you keep soiling your Depends about. You want the Hawai'ian officials to break the law so that you can get your semen-covered fingers on it for yourself.
Never gonna happen. You may as well get back to using bold, italic, and underline font, wretch.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:44 am
Opps one more thing,when the obamamanure went to visit africa last month, I saw them waving banners that said “WELCOME HOME”, to me that means “birthplace”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:47 am
“Lately, I haven't seen much in this country of which I could honestly say I'm all that proud….”
Hey, everybody, test-taker hates America. In other news, fire is hot and light is bright.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:50 am
Some of the best ones, like Florida Christian, raise it to an art form. Florida has probably fooled 20 people who are NOT birthers, let along the dozens who ARE.
But then there's a whole middle-class of potentially facetious posters who go too far toward idiocy. You cannot tell whether it's tongue-in-cheek.
My philosophy is that if I cannot tell whether the person is a birther or merely posing as a birther, then I should err on the side of caution and blast away with both figurative barrels. Shoot first and ask questions later. The response you get will always clear it up.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:50 am
Well, since the entire Congressional delegation from Hawaii consists of democrats, that's pretty unlikely. The birthers are the best thing that ever happened to democrats, and they know this. Like other democrats, they'll probably just let the birthers splinter the GOP down the middle, crack open a few beers, and watch the ensuing train wreck from the sidelines.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:55 am
“Your” wrong. It's “you're.”
It's “capiche” not “capich.”
Orly Taitz has not won ANY case against ANYBODY. She even lost the cases where she was sued for dental malpractice. That's the dumbest shit you've written and you could fill Homer Simpson's Pig Crap silo with the dumb shit you've written.
Cook was a volunteer. He is allowed by law to change his mind about the volunteer duty that he volunteered for in MAY 2009, four months after the rest of the world learned who the President of the United States is.
He sued to get out of fighting. The DoD rightfully understood that to be Cook's way of changing his mind.
So his orders were cancelled.
He didn't force Obama to do anything. He didn't “win” and neither did Orly Taitz.
You're really stupid. I hope you keep writing to me.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:56 am
you'll be picking up the bottle and probably more than you can handle after I reveal to you a win by the so “Called Birthers” because you “HIDERS” just lost a big one.*UPDATE*Maj.Gen.Frederick Cook who had a lawsuit against Obamamure was to be deployed to afganistan on 7/09/09 has refused the commander in failures orders and his orders were revoke ! Because the commander in failure has not provided sufficient evidence to the american people who he is.His passport,schoolrecords,medical have all be kept under seal,and ask yourselves why, what is he hiding?His Lawyer?Queen of liberty.Orly Taitz,so pop a few qualudes and a six pack,”cause he's going down.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:56 am
Burn birther burn!
(I don't even care if you're real or not, just keep it coming!)
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:00 am
once again your STUPID I LIVED IN HAVAII AND WORKED AT PEARL HARBOR ON THE USS CHUNG HOON and the true name for that state is HAVAII, STUPID!!!!!!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:02 am
Yes, keit here is proving my point.
I have written that I enjoy poking test-taker Tuci78 just to watch him take 50 words to say “ouch.”
The other birthers are a bit different. Where test-taker is filled to bursting with his own sense of self-satisfaction, the others lack self-confidence.
That's where I come in. I point out that they're wrong, as rudely as possible. This makes them even more certain that they are correct. Or it makes them unwilling to “lose face.” Either way, they dig in their heels.
I don't mind sharing this information with you. I always tell them, “you can't fix stupid.” So it's ok if they read this. Sort of like the Green Bay Packers running halfback sweep right and halfback sweep left every single play from 1942 – 1962. You know it's coming. You just cannot stop it.
I only hope keit sticks around long enough for me to get bored of provoking him.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:03 am
Why are you giggling, keit? Did randypuppy loan you his monkey with magic fingers?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:04 am
Um, keit?
You're cute and all but, that's old news. And of course you interpretation is all “birther crazy” (just like you should be doing–keep it up!) but don't be spreading old news as if it was new… we want drama! We want excitement!
Make stuff up if you have to. You birthers have made up this whole controversy, so don't hesitate to continue that tradition.
Remember! Drama! Excitement!
Now go…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:05 am
let me just add another throne in your side,after the elections on your so called fox network,the ambassador of kenya was being interviewed in kenya and said they were celebrating his “BIRTHPLACE” are you going to twist that one around too!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:07 am
Said by stephenperry: –”Can you post a link to this information, please?”–
Link: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090728_us_ho…
See bottom of story for the following:
–”The issue is not likely to go away, and Hawaii state Sen. Will Espero said he would introduce legislation next year to have birth certificates declared public records.
Espero (D, Ewa-Honouliuli-Ewa Beach) said the Obama fuss has raised questions about public and private records and says it would be in the state's interest to have open public record of births.
“It would be important for relatives and even neighbors,” Espero said.”–
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:10 am
let me just add 1 more piece to the facts,he traveled to pakinstan in '82 pakinstan DID NOT ALLOW AMERICANS THERE Hmmmmm supposedly he was indonesian then,obivously I know more about him than you do…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:10 am
No, his grandmother didn't say that. Yet another part of birther mythology. It was a brief mistranslation which she immediately corrected when she understood it.
But, keit, I was at his birth in Hi. I even have video tape, but I won't release it since it shows… you know… his mothers open…
Well, it just wouldn't be respectful.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:10 am
No, his grandmother didn't say that. Yet another part of birther mythology. It was a brief mistranslation which she immediately corrected when she understood it.
But, keit, I was at his birth in Hi. I even have video tape, but I won't release it since it shows… you know… his mothers open…
Well, it just wouldn't be respectful.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:12 am
No. Actually “capich” means you don't know how to spell “capiche.”
That's actually what that word means…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:19 am
you'll see when this happens on who's right and who's wrong. kept on smokin that shit.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:19 am
you'll see when this happens on who's right and who's wrong. kept on smokin that shit.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:24 am
That's fascinating! So a state Sen. from Hi. is putting up a bill to declare all Hi. records public? Well this would be good news for Obama if it passes, but I doubt it will since it's a really bad idea for other reasons…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:28 am
of course, that would be if he's “hiding” something like any crook would do right?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:31 am
once a druggy always a druggy,so sad,I really feel bad for you closed minde folks who can't think outside of a paper bag.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:44 am
Some food for thought concerning the notion that all the officials who have confirmed the COLB's authenticity are “corrupt” and “in on the conspiracy….”
If we assume the birthers are correct, then government officials in any or perhaps all of the following places are in on the conspiracy to hide President Obama's true birthplace:
Hawai'i, Kenya, California, Masschusetts, Illinois, and Washington, D.C.
These co-conspirators are a heterogeneous mix of people from different political parties and socioeconomic strata.
You have the Republican Governor of Hawai'i, Linda Lingle. You've got Kenyan goat-herders sitting around Sarah Obama and “Bishop” Ron McRae. And everyone in between.
There is an obvious flaw in the logic supporting the birther's corrupt officials argument.
It goes back to the heterogeneity of the population of co-conspirators.
Take Linda Lingle, for example. She is the Governor. She has a staff. Some of them have access to her conversations, writings, and meetings. Some of them have to be in on it, as well. Those people, who signed up to work for a Republican Governor, probably don't have lust for Obama in their hearts.
One of them, by now, would have reached out to someone in the media, perhaps even by anonymously leaking it, with the information necessary to prove the conspiracy exists and Obama was really born on foreign soil.
You wouldn't even have to give away the full answer. Just a hint. Believe me, the right wing would follow the trail to the bitter end, like the dhole chasing Mowgli to the Bee-People.
But you could make MILLIONS for yourself and be a hero to racist white people all throughout the country, if you just slipped a copy of a document proving there's a conspiracy afoot into your briefcase as you're locking up the office one Thursday evening. No one would know it was you. And if they did? So what! You've got millions of dollars and hundreds of 2nd Amendment loving patriots willing to provide you free personal security around the clock.
Take the Kenyan goat herders. Sarah Obama didn't say she saw Obama being born. Or did she? There were other people in that village. Surely some are as old as she is. Is it not possible that one of those older people would also remember having been present at the birth of the world's most famous black man?
Can one of those people not be coaxed into sitting down in some courtroom and saying a few words? Failing that, are they impervious to offers of compensation to tell their story to Sean Hannity? Do they not have dire and urgent need of everything from clean water to Turkish bath towels to food that didn't grow in sand to a house that is somewhere besides this GOD AWFUL FUCKING VILLAGE?
Is Sean Hannity not willing to pay $1,000,000 for this information? I guarantee you that Rupert Murdoch is. In fact, I bet you he'd sell you Sean Hannity for that information.
You can follow this out with the officials who know about his college records, or his law school records, or his law firm records, or his elective office records. Are NONE of those people in foreclosure right now? Are they all Democrats?
Do crabs sit atop one another contentedly in barrels now?
So it doesn't make sense. Too many cooks spoil the broth. Too many co-conspirators in too many political parties in too many continents with too many individualized desires and vulnerabilities spoils the conspiracy theory.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:51 am
I can think outside your entire universe. But that's another subject.
What I really feel sorry for is you gullible birthers who believe everything you read on wingnut blogs and can't distinguish between fact and fiction.
Parents lived in Hi. when he was born. Birth certificate, certified by the state of Hi, and confirmed multiple times, says he was born in Hi. Newspaper announcements placed in papers in Honolulu say he was born in Hi. Neighbors from the time remember that he was born in Hi.
And what have you got?
Nothing…. except ignorance and racism.
Dude, that paper bag seems a little to heavy for you. Come to my gym–I'll teach ya ta think straight! You don't want to be a moron for the rest of your life do you? For just 4 easy payments of $19.95 I'll teach you how to no longer be an idiot!
But act now! Offer only good while supplies last. Void where prohibited.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:55 am
Well, one the problems is whether you want just anyone to have a copy of your birth certificate, because I sure as hell don't. The law, if it is passed, will probably have safeguards against who can request a document, and for what purposes, but the thought of just anyone off the street walking in to a county vital records office and requesting anyone's birth certificate is a little scary.
The positive to this is that people will finally stop pestering the state of Hawaii to release the “real” birth certificate. The problem is that it still wouldn't please the birthers; they would just update the conspiracy theory to account for this as well (if they haven't already). It could also introduce a lot of problems with identity theft.
If they limit this law to only cover elected officials, then it should be okay. It's the millions of other people in Hawaii that don't hold public office who stand to suffer the most collateral damage if this law is passed.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:01 am
No. You weren't paying attention. It would be good news for Obama, but a bad idea for everyone else.
Imagine if YOUR birth certificate was a public record. Then lets say you… oh… I don't know, started a band. Started getting a little recognized. So some fan gets your birth certificate and gets the name of your mother. Looks her up. Starts stalking her. All because your private information was made public due to this law, which only helped Obama….
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:15 am
Hey I hadn't thought of that. Let's see a link to this law, keit.
I have a bone to pick with George W. Bush's mother. All I need is her address.
No, not really. I know she lives on Mars.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:22 am
Oh. Never mind.
Keit. You lied. I'm shocked, shocked! that you were not telling the truth.
You wrote about “a bill from a senator from Havaii, who is going to pass that will show Barrack or Barry whatever name he has,his birth certificate so we can end this mess once and for all.”
But you lied. Looking at Private Joker's link, this is obvious. First of all, the link is just to a story about the U.S. House Resolution that I told you about in my reply to you. It confirms Obama is a Hawai'ian by birth.
But at the very end, there's the part Joker darpot quotes. It is about future (get that, future) legislation that will only affect the state of Hawai'i. The guy being quoted is a Hawai'ian STATE Senator, not a U.S. Senator representing Hawai'i.
It has nothing to do with Obama and will not make him reveal anything.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:24 am
Oh. Never mind.
Keit. You lied. I'm shocked, shocked! that you were not telling the truth.
You wrote about “a bill from a senator from Havaii, who is going to pass that will show Barrack or Barry whatever name he has,his birth certificate so we can end this mess once and for all.”
But you lied. Private Joker tried to help you, by cutting and pasting some provocative (to Joker) text and providing this link:
http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090728_us_ho…
Looking at Private Joker's link, this is obvious. First of all, the link is just to a story about the U.S. House Resolution that I told you about in my reply to you. It confirms Obama is a Hawai'ian by birth.
But at the very end, there's the part Joker darpot quotes. It is about future (get that, future) legislation that will only affect the state of Hawai'i. The guy being quoted is a Hawai'ian STATE Senator, not a U.S. Senator representing Hawai'i.
It has nothing to do with Obama and will not make him reveal anything.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:37 am
In all sincerity, thanks. I would like to learn Italian someday.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:39 am
For the proposition that birthers are stupid, I present the latest in an ongoing series….
keit.
Not only did keit not know how to spell the word…
Not only did keit fail to pick up on my impolitely direct notation to him that he didn't spell it correctly…
But keit came back at me with CAPSLOCK!
QED
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:47 am
keit von Einstein,
mstylplx already corrected you about the false notion that “Sarah Obama said she was at his birth in Kenya.” You can read about that from David Weigel's keyboard instead of mine.
http://washingtonindependent.com/52519/the-sara…
I'd rather focus on this “minister” of yours. You're referring to “Bishop” Ron McRae. He's a “street preacher.” You know what that is. You saw one when you were rushing to catch public transportation and you ignored the guy with the sandwich board talking in three languages at once about the Zionist Crusade Brought to You By Dairy Cows.
That's your minister. I'm glad you have evidence that's reliable.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:53 am
If only Billy Mays were still with us. You could make a mint.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:53 am
“kept on smokin that shit.”
Ah! Now we're getting somewhere. How long did you keep on smokin' that shit? You're telling us about something you did, hence the word “kept.”
As in, “I kept on smokin' that shit.”
I knew you had to be on something prescription-strength when I read your first post.
Oh, and “you'll see when this happens on who's right and who's wrong” is a DEVASTATING rejoinder. It just blows away all of my facts, laws, and real people saying what I told you they said.
“We names our kids after what we think's gonna happen to 'em. Ain't that right, 'Stabbed in Jail?'” — Cletus on the Simpsons
[cut to boy sitting on the steps whittling a stick to a sharp pointed spear]
“We'll see who stabs who!” — Cletus's son
That's what your little come-back reminded me of, von Einstein. Except that you're Cletus. Not the kid with the stick.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:56 am
Well, it’s an easy language. If us Siciliani can puzzle it out, nobody else on the planet should have any trouble with it.
Anent the Sicilian/Mezzogiorno styles of pronunciation, it’s entirely understandable that English-speakers should write some Italian words as if the ultimate syllable were extinguished or otherwise suppressed.
What tends to be heard from Italian-Americans – not just on The Sopranos but throughout the nation – are the dialects of the most recent (circa 1900) wave of immigrants from Italy, and these were almost entirely from the southern provinces – il Mezzogiorno, “the Noonday,” the hot, sunny, horribly impoverished regions like Campagnia, Abruzzi, Calabria, and Sicily.
When a Sicilian says “Capisce,” he commonly slurs the final syllable into near-nothingness, and it comes out sounding like “Ka-PEESH.”
In the mouth of a cultured Wop of Tuscany or Rome or Milano, it sounds more like “Ka-PEACH-eh.”
That’s the schoolroom pronunciation.
In fact, “Sciliani” (“Sicilians,” properly pronounced “See-chee-lee-AHN-ee“) in Palermo sounds more like “See-gee-lee-AHN.”
If you’re going to learn Italian, don’t try to emulate the southern Italians’ pronunciations. It’s tempting because – just as we see with America’s southern drawl – it’s seductively easy.
But as with Dubbya’s highly affected Texas twang, gurgling Italian in the Sicilian style makes you sound like a fucking idiot.
I can get away with it – and I can tighten up my pronunciation to sound positively Florentine if I want to – but it’d be a damned bad habit for you.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:58 am
Thanks for sharing, von Einstein. I was deeply concerned about what a Kenyan banner means to you.
Hey, Steve X, you can now add “Kenyan banner” to “Some guy named Alan” and “a half-eaten breakfast” in the Mountain O’ Birther Evidence.
Now they have a banner. Maybe they can change it to “Mission Accomplished!”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:01 pm
With the possible exception of the “do not resuscitate until finished” advice re: Salma Hayek and peanut allergies…
this is far and away the most useful post you’ve written.
(don’t bother correcting me. I prefer to remember your advice as I creatively construed it.)
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:06 am
Sorry for the spelling snark, but…
The word is spelled “capisce.” meaning “You (polite form) understand.”
With a question mark: “Capisce?“
…the meaning is “Do you understand?”
To say “I understand,” the Italian is “capisco.”
To say “You (informal) understand,” it's “capisci.”
To say either “You (formal) understand” or “He/she understands,” it's “capisce.”
Irregular verb capire, meaning “to understand.”
E va' fa'n culo, faccia di merda.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:08 pm
Feh. The essence of teaching (I discovered when they first assigned a couple of externs to my service as a resident) is remembering all the ways in which you yourself had fucked up, and pointing ‘em out to your students.
“Don’t make the same mistakes I did,” I used to emphasize. “Find entirely new ways to screw up. That’s how the body of human knowledge is expanded.”
Sadly, none of them ever lived up to my advice. I think that’s because my own education and training had pretty much exhausted every possible way to fuck up, and there weren’t any new ways to screw the pooch left.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:11 pm
It’s the weirdest thing.
For about 12 minutes a night, there’s this weird vortex on this site where you write things that are utterly sane.
Quick, before someone turns into a pumpkin, I need your best recipe for lasagna. Or something else where meat and sauce have a sweaty threesome with pasta. Nothing too complicated for a heterosexual bachelor though.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:11 am
Hm. Content? Hatred of this country, assumption that “everybody” joins him in this sentiment, bad temper – yep, same old stevie. Perfect Obamaphile “team leader.”
If one wishes to draw the perfect conclusion of what Barry Soetoro means to America, look no further than our little stevie. The very model of a National Socialist Party stalwart.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:17 am
Hail Mary fulla grace…. randypuppy is giving keit von Einstein a run for his money as Dumbest Birther of the Day. keit von Einstein is here on the “Is this the source of the forged Kenyan Birth Certificate” thread. randypuppy is on the “Surprise: Orly Taitz still lying…” thread.
So we have an AFC Champion, randypuppy the monkeytoucher, and an NFC Champion, keit von Einstein. Who will be the Super Birther? Time will tell.
I present evidence in support of randypuppy, as follows.
randypuppy is bitching in his usual paranoid way about someone re-directing the links he posted to various irrelevant birth certificate examples.
I saw the links yesterday and wrote to him telling him that the links were unpersuasive because they go to crackpot websites.
He REPLIED to me asking me how I redirected his links.
He then posted the links again today.
After re-posting the links today, he subsequently posted his Declaration of Defiant Dependence, in which he tells us that although we (he thinks) keep “fucking with” his links, he will keep posting them. Because he really needs the approval of people who he thinks are fucking with his links.
Absurd in itself, but anyway, it shows that he paid no attention whatsoever to the issue with his links, which is not that they're broken, but that they suck.
Observe and report:
________________________
stephenperry, 14 hours ago
“You don't get it, randypuppy.
You STILL haven't fixed these links!
The problem is they're all to crackpot websites that don't purport to tell the truth; they purport to ask spooky questions.
Except the one with “humor” in the link address. That one doesn't even purport to ask questions.
I know, I know. You don't know what “purport” means. It's okay. I didn't expect to teach you anything this time. You already know you're stupid.
And you already know that no one gives a shit about your whackjob fringe website links. That's why no one cared the last time you posted them. That's why you got all mad and called everyone “freaks” and “morons” before threatening to kill us all.
And that's why I like fucking with you. Because you go out of your way to show that you cannot stand it, but you try to dish it out in absurd and unintentionally-hilarious ways.
Get back to something you know something about – getting monkeys drunk.”
________________
Randwulf
13 hours ago
“How did you do that dipshit? Are you Dave Weigel? Do you know him? All the links were redirected. I posted them again though. They just worked fine 2 minutes ago. We will see how long that lasts before one of your “people” (monkeys with them?) fucks with them again. TRUTH? YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH! (Thanks Jack!)”
______________________________
It goes without saying that I did not Hail Mary fulla grace…. randypuppy is giving keit von Einstein a run for his money as Dumbest Birther of the Day. keit is on the “Is this the source of the forged Kenyan Birth Certificate” thread. randypuppy is here on the “Surprise: Orly Taitz still lying…” thread.
So we have an AFC Champion, randypuppy the monkeytoucher, and an NFC Champion, keit von Einstein. Who will be the Super Birther? Time will tell.
I present evidence in support of randypuppy, as follows.
randypuppy is bitching in his usual paranoid way about someone re-directing the links he posted to various irrelevant birth certificate examples.
I saw the links yesterday and wrote to him telling him that the links were unpersuasive because they go to crackpot websites.
He REPLIED to me asking me how I redirected his links.
He then posted the links again.
He then posted his Declaration of Defiant Dependence, in which he tells us that although we (he thinks) keep “fucking with” his links, he will keep posting them. Absurd in itself, but anyway, it shows that he paid no attention whatsoever to the issue with his links, which is not that they're broken, but that they suck.
Observe and report:
________________________
stephenperry, 14 hours ago
“You don't get it, randypuppy.
You STILL haven't fixed these links!
The problem is they're all to crackpot websites that don't purport to tell the truth; they purport to ask spooky questions.
Except the one with “humor” in the link address. That one doesn't even purport to ask questions.
I know, I know. You don't know what “purport” means. It's okay. I didn't expect to teach you anything this time. You already know you're stupid.
And you already know that no one gives a shit about your whackjob fringe website links. That's why no one cared the last time you posted them. That's why you got all mad and called everyone “freaks” and “morons” before threatening to kill us all.
And that's why I like fucking with you. Because you go out of your way to show that you cannot stand it, but you try to dish it out in absurd and unintentionally-hilarious ways.
Get back to something you know something about – getting monkeys drunk.”
________________
Randwulf
13 hours ago
“How did you do that dipshit? Are you Dave Weigel? Do you know him? All the links were redirected. I posted them again though. They just worked fine 2 minutes ago. We will see how long that lasts before one of your “people” (monkeys with them?) fucks with them again. TRUTH? YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH! (Thanks Jack!)”
______________________________
So now the monkeyfucker thinks I'm Dave Weigel. “How did you do that dipshit?” LMAO.
It goes without saying that I did not re-direct his links. I doubt that anyone else did. But I certainly didn't claim to do that, and his reply shows that he thinks I did.
Who wins, folks? von Einstein will have to swing for the fences.
So now the monkeyfucker thinks I'm Dave Weigel. “How did you do that dipshit?” LMAO.
Who wins, folks? von Einstein will have to swing for the fences.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:20 am
You attack my spelling and me. You cannot attack facts because this would show that your in the wrong? My shining intellect? Your not black? Your very prideful and you do not know me! I cannot be black because I do not support Obama? I be a good nigga fo yoz masta!
Your the racist because you stereotype me because I am black! I must support a socialist Marxist and vote for a black man because I'm black? I do not type very much and this is obvious. You on the other hand condemn me and yes a black man! If you do not think so then you can come an measure my big black dick you racist! You offend me! I have to be a house boy and if not I am not a good nigga? I write pretty good! I type pretty bad.
Obama hates white people! This is a fact! I see it everyday with his supporters!
Obama will not release his birth certificate and this does not seem in anyway out of line?
You must be a liberal? Liberals are a fringe group full of disgusting radicals as the right is full of tax cuts for their friends. I vote for Allen Keyes and I am a member of http://www.bondaction.org
Look at my picture Mr racist and see I am very black?
Obama is a radical progressive and you Mr Perry sound like a faggot? Yes I called you a faggot! I do not like you! Your a racist because you feel your above black people and they cannot help themselves and that is the wort kind of racist!
I would respect a klansman before you because he is at least honest and we are not in a spelliing contest so lets see if you can read FUCK YOU MUTHAFUCKER
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 12:22 pm
Charitable of you to pick up von Einstein’s quote at “closed minded” and thus neatly avoid the whole awkward “ther” business.
Don’t you want to choose up sides again? Remember on the playground at recess, when you’d get ready to play some sport, and two captains pick teammates, and you play for 10 minutes and one side is just beating the other side mercilessly, and you realize you need to choose up new teams?
Here you are, multisyllabic and rarin’ to review some credible evidence. And yet, your side has mouth-breathers and kids who never take out their retainer, even when eating.
You have randypuppy. Can’t decide whether to post links for us or save his allowance for a bullet to kill us all.
You have Private Joker. Can’t decide between hero worship and split personality disorder.
You have Whitebread Tyrone. Can’t decide between being a gay white guy and being a gay white guy.
And then there’s von Einstein. Can’t. Just plain can’t.
None of them could write their way out of a paper bag. At least three of the four of them think Rand McNally is a country near Xanadu.
Meanwhile my side has dozens of intelligent people who do a lot of heavy lifting, freeing me up to harp on randypuppy’s zoological indiscretions.
Sigh. It’s like you have to fight with one hand behind your back. I almost feel for you.
Tell you what. If we ever met in an airport and each had a couple of hours to kill, I would buy the first round as we traded insults. But every one of my words counts as four of yours. And you have to drink some shitty blended red wine that was violently hustled out of the barrel last month.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:27 am
Oh the brainless and the misinformed!
On a 'possibly' unrelated subject, I had a guy recently tell me there was soon to be a “bill to reveal EVERYTHING.” (caps his)
That one really cracked me up. I told him I was pretty sure you had to meditate on a mountaintop for years… and do tantric yoga or something… before EVERYTHING would be revealed to you…
But he didn't get it…. oh well.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:28 am
Your a flaming faggot! Who feels he is important! All the whiles others wish you would go off and die of aids like your former lover! You twisted fudgepacker!
The reason you post is to set the record straight that you would like Obama to fuck you in your brown eye! You sicko communist penis smoker!
Back in the closet! You are a racist! That is the problem! Feel sorry for another you tool!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:30 am
Your” wrong. It's “you're.”
“He not black.” Yes, he is. You not smart.
It's “capiche” not “capich.”
Who the fuck are you a spelling bee?
No your a JERK OFF LITTLE PUNK BITCH AND YOUR IP ADDRESS IS SHOWING?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 7:57 am
Said by stephenperry: –”Can you post a link to this information, please?”–
Link: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI…
Some excerpts – see link for full story.
–”Espero told WND his bill is aimed at “giving citizens access to birth records” under a standard of government transparency which would permit journalists to request in writing the public disclosure of vital birth records including long-form birth certificates of all persons born in Hawaii. He said it would include the release of birth records on those previously born in Hawaii.
“My decision to file the legislation was primarily a result of the fuss over President Obama's birth records and the lingering questions,” Espero said. “–
–”"My motivation is strictly to promote transparency,” he said. “When I found out that Hawaii birth records were not available to the public my first thought was, 'Why wouldn't they be available to the public?'
“As far as I am concerned, records regarding whether a person was born here or not should be in the public domain,” he said.”–
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:03 pm
Whoa, whoa, slow down, von Einstein. Not everyone’s as sharp as you.
You’re referring to the disgraced Major Cook. You say “his orders were revoke !”
Translating that from IGotDroppedOnMyHeadAsAChildese into English, we are left with the impression that you think Major Cook’s orders being cancelled amounts to a victory for Major Cook and his lawyer “Queen of liberty.Orly Taitz.”
More importantly, you see this as somehow a loss for President Obama.
As usual, von Einstein, your fingers type faster than your brain thinks. And your busy little fingers get you in trouble. randypuppy’s got the same problem with a dextrous orangutan he has had his eye on for months.
Cook was a volunteer. He volunteered in May 2009 for service in Afghanistan.
Volunteers are not required to fight. That’s what’s nifty about being a volunteer.
If a volunteer soldier changes his mind, his orders to ship out are cancelled.
Every volunteer soldier knows this. Every OTHER soldier knows this, and resents the chickenshits who back out.
Anyway, Cook and his Queen of Comedy Taitz cooked up the volunteer request for deployment just so that orders would be generated requiring him to be in such and such a place on such and such a date to ship out.
Those orders, of course, are a prerequisite for being able to file suit. Ask test-taker what “prerequisite” means; I don’t feel like waking jimpa up so I can get my Birther Finger Puppets back for you.
So Cook volunteered so he could get orders generated, so he could sue and try to embarrass the President.
When Cook sued the Dept. of Defense, pleading with the court not to make him go fight for a guy 20 levels up the chain of command, the DoD rightfully interpreted that as a volunteer changing his mind.
They cancelled the orders pursuant to law. No big deal.
And, of course, Cook lost his security clearance and thus could not work for Simtech on DoD property anymore. So he’s out of a job and he’s a laughingstock. So is his lawyer. Though she has a job. She threatened to sue Phil Berg AND Michael Medved, both for defamation. Queen of Comedy.
Wait a minute. You indicated this was “a win by the so ‘Called Birthers.’”
Leaving aside your creative punctuation, care to explain how getting fired from a job you really need (he’s suing to try to get it back! LMAO) and becoming hated by every soldier in uniform constitutes a win for Cook and the birthers?
von Einstein, I’m starting to wonder whether you are really smart enough to deserve your new moniker.
I’m sure your fact-based and witty reply will remove all doubt.
What’s that? Yes, you can ask test-taker what a “moniker” is. It’s not what you think. It has nothing to do with that “single eyeglass on a chain” thing-a-ma-bob that rich 19th century Germans used to have.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
See, mystylplx, isn’t this fun?
The fuse is lit, and the fire is on. Burn, baby, burn!
I like the bit about drama and excitement. The birthers HAVE been getting a bit predictable lately. I want to see a birther theory involving an orphanage in Cambodia that has a kid who can bend spoons by realizing that there is no spoon.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 8:15 am
Said by stephenperry: –”Private Joker tried to help you, by cutting and pasting some provocative (to Joker) text and providing this link:”–
I was not being “provocative”; I simply posted a link to one article where the Hawaiian State Sen. talked about the legislation – as you were asking for. Now, despite me being civil about the posting, you have to start with more of your lip. Fine so be it, but all you do is discredit yourself.
Since the first link was not to your liking, I have provided another link to another article with more discussion with the Senator. Of course I know its a waste of time for you, but others here can read it and decide for themselves.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:22 pm
I did that on purpose to see if you would pick up on that,ha ha ha ha, Now I’m trying to figure out if you are stewy,or brian on family guy,’cause your a wanna be NOBODY ! KEEP SMOKIN’ THAT SHIT !
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:28 pm
I have no idea whether he traveled to “pakinstan.”
Where is that? Is it anywhere near “sinsinatti?”
There was never any ban on American travel to Pakistan. That’s a really old birther lie. It has been debunked even by this very website.
But I’ll give you factcheck.org, just so I can see test-taker’s head spin:
“We continue to receive queries about claims and theories advanced by “birthers,” who wish to believe that Barack Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the USA or that he somehow gave up his citizenship and thus is not qualified to hold the office he occupies. One is a claim, first advanced last year, that his trip to Pakistan in 1981 proves he must not have been a U.S. citizen because Americans were not permitted to travel there at the time.
This one is not quite as transparent as the April Fools’ Day hoax that took in many of these deniers of Obama’s birthplace bona fides. That one was a fabricated Associated Press story about Obama’s student records from Occidental College. But the Pakistan theory is just as false. The truth, easily proven, is that American citizens traveled freely to Pakistan in 1981.”
http://wire.factcheck.org/2009/06/05/more-birther-nonsense-obamas-1981-pakistan-trip/
See that? The truth is “easily proven.” Like I told you. Old lie. Yawn.
I’m not surprised you used it. You, according to the Wall Street Journal, are a “lunatic” — see for yourself:
“It would not surprise us if there does turn out to be a racist strain among the birther fringe. After all, birthers are lunatics and racists are lunatics. It does not follow, however, that all lunatics are racists.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/best_of_the_web_today.html
See that? Birthers are lunatics. And racists. WSJ is the flagship conservative newspaper. But even they can’t avoid saying birthers are lunatics. Nor did they say birthers are not racist!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:29 pm
No, von Einstein, you didn’t make any of your obvious fuck-ups on purpose. Nice try.
And it’s “Stewie,” idiot.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:36 pm
No, von Einstein, you are the one who does the twisting around.
Well, you and the “fox network.” At least you didn’t put it reverent holy capital letters.
If your evidence came from Fox, I would invite you to ask someone about what is known in criminal law as the “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” doctrine. Oh wait I found my Birther Finger Puppets.
When you get evidence from a tainted source, the evidence is discarded. It is the fruit of a poisonous tree. And you shouldn’t eat it. Unless you want to be cast out of the Garden of Rational Thought and into the Den of Birther Spelling Hell.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 8:36 am
Hey stephenperry you little Zionist punk, you still here? Every day, defending the indefensible, shouting down reason, you must be paid for this shit.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:39 pm
No. Havaii is the old name for French Polynesia.
You’re dumb as a box of hammers.
I notice you have entirely abandoned trying to defend the absurdity of your birther claims. Now you’re just lying about who you are and where you worked. Interesting. So you’re conserving your resources. No sense expending effort on the birther nonsense. Not after the WSJ called all birthers “lunatics.” That had to hurt, eh, von Einstein?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:49 pm
See that’s the thing; you write “if not in Honolulu.” But, breezy though you tried to be, you have no evidence that he was not born in Honolulu.
Which is why you have to focus on Mombasa Messiah and prison sex. Truth is boring. I realize that.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 8:50 am
Said by ray1776: –”Your a racist because you feel your above black people and they cannot help themselves and that is the wort kind of racist! “–
For what it is worth most of us do not feel that way. I believe black people not only can help themselves, but do help themselves.
Two friends of mine, who are black, are proof. Both are highly successful and well respected. One is a Judge and the other is an attorney working for the state's banking inspector. They got there by helping themselves and working hard. Just like myself, and some of my other friends have done.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:53 pm
No. The truth doesn’t threaten us.
You, on the other hand, did just threaten to beat mystylplx on the head with a golf club.
This must be more of that unbiased, pure reasoning with no attempt at dissembling that you were bragging about employing.
I can’t say that I’m surprised. It’s less graphic than your threats against the President. But just as out of bounds.
Like I told you before. You stay classy, Gramps!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:56 pm
you left out someting very important,stewy…if you read the WHOLE thing they were also revoked because be cause he could of been court martialed which then obabmanure would of then have to provide the courts with his b.c.(long form)
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 1:58 pm
who do you think I hung around with “the polynisians” dip shit! ther the ones that told me that,until you live ther shut your pie hole and get educated “STEWY”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
oh yes I did,and try to prove me wrong.I’m a tad bit smarter than you think,and there’s alot more in store that you don’t know about.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
No no. Not null and void. Carpe diem, test-taker. I seized the moment, and the day.
It was more of a Freudian slip than a typo. And that’s why I wrote what I did.
Anyone smarter than von Einstein knows what you MEANT to write.
Is that “immediately null and void” business some kind of Fancy Lawyer Trick? Those, I have it on good authority, do not fly out here in the sticks where the common people trade in rumor and suspicion.
Tsk.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
a court pathologist examined the document as a fake along with the one that Orly Taizt submitted.Try again!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:07 pm
Um, does that include the posts where he rips the U.S.A. a series of new assholes?
What about the one where he calls all of his readers “freaks” and “morons” who can “fuck off and die” if they don’t agree with him? He ends that one by telling us all how happy he would be to use bullets to kill us all.
Or, of course, the one where he threatens to “put steel up all [our] asses” if we “cross swords” with him?
I re-posted a couple of those gems for public educational purposes.
I would say this post logically proves that you and I are not the same person. Not that Private Joker darpot, being a birther, would be amenable to logic.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
then why don’t you ask your Commander in failure to realease his school records,passport,medical,Hmmmm you know I work closely with the police and were all wondering why he’s hiding all this, the only conclusion we can come up with he’s a crimmnal.Because crimmnials hid stuff. That’s we call you “closed minded people”,”hiders”. Good Day
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:10 pm
WoW talk about uneducated “hint” it’s where the taliban hang out.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
you just gave us birthers an idea when this will be over “mission accomplished” Hiders!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:14 pm
“If I were charged under some federal statute that had been signed into law by Obama, the very first thing I would do in court is question the validity of that law by virtue of the fact that there is a question as to the eligibility of the person who did the signing of the bill, making it law. No eligibility, no law.”
You’re making this way too easy for me, randypuppy.
You’re much better at pretending to be heterosexual than you are at pretending to know jack shit about law.
Your plan is ridiculous. Just ask Orly Taitz, who you think should be disbarred. That’s what she had Major Cook do, with spectacularly miserable results.
Federal judges are appointed for life. They really couldn’t give a fuck what anyone, EVEN THE PRESIDENT, thinks when they get on the bench. Ask Justice Souter, who you didn’t even know was retired. He was appointed by George H.W. Bush and then promptly voted and wrote like a liberal. Oops!
Really, randypuppy, I wish you would make this harder. Remember that mercy rule thing? Doesn’t exist here. Sucks for you.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:16 pm
be cause is not a word.
could have been is not the same thing as could of been.
The orders weren’t “also” revoked for any reason. They were revoked because he’s a volunteer. You just make shit up or pass along made up shit that you’re too stupid to notice STINKS.
And you’re totally full of shit. But keep on going. I’m sure randypuppy likes to watch you strain trying to pull it out of your ass.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 9:16 am
Hi Golem. Still don't know what Zionist means, huh? That's ok.
The idea of being insulted by someone named “Golem” is amusing.
I'm not defending the indefensible. That's what YOU are doing. I'm mocking you for defending an absurd conspiracy theory.
I know that the subtle but distinct difference between those two points is lost on you.
No. I don't get paid to be here. You're imaginative. At least a dozen others have accused me of the same thing.
I'd be flattered, except you doofus birthers think anyone who disagrees with your asinine conspiracy theory must be paid by the President of the United States to be posting profanity and sarcasm on an obscure liberal website 3.5 years prior to re-election on an issue that no one would change votes over.
They wouldn't have to pay me, Golem, to fuck with you. I enjoy it. You're stupid, yet belligerent. Never a good combination for a birther. Keep it coming.
Show me where I have been “shouting down reason.” I have done no such thing. Birthers don't have reason. And you cannot shout in words. Even in CAPSLOCK.
Defending your idiocy, you must not get paid to do anything that involves thought.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:18 pm
von eistein will answer,Ok how many have come up to the plate in Havaii? 0 in the judicial system kenya would of won,and Havaii 0
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:19 pm
“You have Whitebread Tyrone. Can’t decide between being a gay white guy and being a gay white guy.”
LMAO
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:21 pm
LOL.
As dumb as I consider you to be, you would have trouble breathing in your sleep. You may be a tad bit smarter than I think. Let’s reserve judgment until you survive the night, mouth-breather.
There’s “alot” more in store that I don’t know about? Oh. Goody. Because your stupidity is boring.
Can we file “there’s alot more in store” along with “we’ll see what happens on who’s right and who’s wrong?”
They both go under “Bullshit you make up when you have
no response because you’re stupid.”
von Einstein, quit while you’re hopelessly behind! Doofus.
Psst! I really hope you don’t quit. You’re dragging down the test-taker’s collective score since you’re on his team.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:28 pm
“a court pathologist examined the document as a fake along with the one that Orly Taizt submitted.Try again!”
Link?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:31 pm
to stephenberry,then it sucks to be you,keep being closed minded,I wish you the best of luck, I ‘m not wasting my breath on you anymore,we’ll just have to see what the courts will decide. have a nice day.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:31 pm
You try again. Start by posting a link to that nonsense about a “court pathologist.” You cannot, because you’re lying.
You’re not talking about “Dr. Ron Polarik,” are you? He’s not a Dr. and isn’t named Ron Polarik, nor does he know jack shit about document analysis (his field is actually market research). This is why he didn’t sign the affidavit and blocked out his identity on the YouTube video.
So you can’t be talking about him. But who else? Let’s see that link. Oh, that’s right. You don’t have one.
I will help you out. Here’s World Net Daily confirming the COLB is authentic:
“A separate WND investigation into Obama’s certification of live birth utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren’t originally there.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214
That’s from August 23, 2008. So almost a year ago, even the wackiest of fringe right-wing websites knew and admitted something you are still lying about.
Yawn.
Oh and why am I not surprised, von Eintein, that you cannot spell Orly Taitz’s name?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:33 pm
unfortunately that’s what we get when we get the info from two different sources,How can you be a volunteer and a maj.gen.? He was ORDERED that’s not volunteer to me .
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:36 pm
Glad you accept your facetious moniker. Even though you cannot spell “Einstein.” You wrote “eistein.” Seriously, stop trying to change your contacts and insert suppositories while typing.
“would of?” Tsk. Still fantasizing, huh?
In the real world, first of all, we say “would have.”
“Would of” is something children write. Tsk.
Second of all, no one cares about your prediction of what would have happened in some horridly ambiguous scenario (you write, as I’ve noted, as well as old people fuck, so it’s hard to tell what you meant by “in the judicial system kenya would of won.”) involving Kenya facing off against Hawai’i.
Havaii continues to be the name of French Polynesia.
You continue to be a complete and utter fool.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 9:39 am
Joker, you can post it as many times as you want.
You're still writing about a Hawai'ian STATE senator. And he doesn't have a bill.
He is talking about his plans to have a bill. Next year.
If he introduced such a bill, it would be defeated. Hawai'i is quite liberal. People on this thread have already cogently discussed the obvious privacy concerns that would outweigh whatever affirmative argument can be made for the nonexistent hypothetical bill.
Even if the bill was passed, it would not apply to the President. Ex post facto and all that.
But it's not going to happen. The bill won't ever come up for a vote. The State senator just wants to get his name in the paper. And he did. WND, in fact.
Thanks for the link. I'm sure that everyone here is just RUSHING over to World Net Daily to read a story about a gleam in an obscure state senator's eye.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:41 pm
no not him we did our own investigation up here and there were errors, and alot of them,But to verify those errors,we tried to get his school records and medical records or passport and couldn’t.That’s what raised red flags.. Before I vote on a candidate I do a background check,This phony did not pass MY background check
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 9:43 am
I saw your link. I responded to it. I am not going to repeat it here. Not sure why you are compelled to post the same thing three times on such an obscure issue as a nonexistent potential bill affecting only one state that would never even come up for a vote anyway.
If you didn't think the text was provocative, why did you post the text in addition to the link? Did you not think it proved your point?
I didn't give you any lip. I wasn't even writing to you. If you don't like being referred to in the 3rd person, I don't care. Joker.
You never answered my serious questions to you about your selective sensitivity (cf. Randwulf and Tuci78). Why should I care about your thoughts concerning nonexistent “lip?”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:48 pm
“to stephenberry,then it sucks to be you,keep being closed minded,I wish you the best of luck…”
Well. Whoever this “stephenberry” character is, you sure zinged him good! Too bad you’re no longer wasting time on him.
At least that will free you up for more remedial English lessons as well as an introductory course I call “How to Lookit Stuff Up on The Thing What Beeps When I Set My Coffee Cup On The Keyboard.”
Happily, since you never indicated you’re no longer communicating with ME, I can provide both services for you.
However, there’s just one small formality.
Please post your original long-form birth certificate here. I need to be sure of who I’m dealing with.
Thanks, “von eistein.” You’re a trooper.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:51 pm
WB Jim. You’ve missed some fun.
Did you see where randypuppy thinks I’m David Weigel?
I have to say, I am torn between choosing to admitting to being you, and admitting to being David Weigel.
Do you suppose I can get Obama to pay me for blogging as all three of us? I wonder how the health care premiums work? Do I have to pay three times as much for the same coverage a regular ol’ single individual gets?
Luckily, I have time to ponder these issues. von Einstein just ran off to find other people to frighten with the awesome power of his brain.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
Oh thank God. You did your own research. Priceless.
I promise, I pinkie swear, on a stack of Qu’rans and sticky copies of Juggs and Big Butt, that if you post your “research” here, and I mean ALL of it, I will leave you alone. I won’t write a word to you.
Your “research” includes without limitation the “background check” and any other analysis you have done on the Obama birther issue.
I will hold this offer open until you accept. But I will not refrain from posting to you unless and until you accept by posting all the requested material.
This has to be the Summer Reading List of my dreams.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:34 pm
wow… ray…
methink thou des protest (WAYYYY) to much
sounding A LOT like Larry (I’m NOT Gay, I Just Can’t Get Enough Cock’) Craig, boy
you might want to hump on up for a prayer session and some of that ‘special’ absolution @ ‘C’ street w/’the Family’
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 10:45 am
“Hatred of this country, assumption that “everybody” joins him in this sentiment, bad temper”
Wow. The irony…
Coming from the guy who smears American politicians of ALL stripes, who casts aspersions about journalists, philanthropic foundations run by Republicans, insults third-world and first-world women with equally malevolent glee, mocks the handicapped, and lusts thirstily for news that the President has been forcibly sodomized in prison without the “hope” of lubrication…
Coming from the guy who posts in bold, italic, and yes, even underlined font when no one responds to his over-wrought, insulting, and meandering prose…
Coming from the man for whom “delusional” would be four clicks back toward sane…
I would just have to “say” (write, doofus) consider the source.
You're a gem, test-taker. You stay classy. Fuckwit.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:47 pm
Nah. I’m solidly correct 24/7. Like I told you, I used up all possible ways to fuck up by the time I hit my twenty-fifth birthday.
It’s when I’m solidly correct on your Messiah, little stevie, that what you use in lieu of a mind goes completely bugfuck, and you have to scream and rant and rave and otherwise behave like the sad little sack of Obamaphile shit you just about every waking minute of every waking day.
You just had a brief period of lucidity when your interest in the Italian language got piqued, and you wrote – briefly – as if you were fit for human company.
That’s over now. Back to little stevie, as usual.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:50 pm
Ken, never mind Whitebread Tyrone.
Others have already done the “pretending to be a race you’re not” thing.
What do you make of randypuppy having a conversation WITH HIMSELF at the top of the thread?
I would love to think I drove him to this point. But I’m sure it has more to do with his mother repeatedly dropping him on his head when he wouldn’t stop crying as a baby. The unraveling of his pathetic mind was all just a matter of time.
Even so, it’s gonna be a great day for me. I’ve already accomplished my goal for the day. We paid bloggers get a bonus every time a birther’s head explodes.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 10:55 am
I'm shocked that you don't like me.
Most people who lie and get called on it don't like it much.
I did attack your spelling. It sucks.
I also attacked your non-existent facts. Re-read your posts, and re-read my replies. You'll notice my replies are the ones that have actual links to articles. Yours are the ones that just have poorly-formatted gibberish.
You didn't notice the factual discussion, because you're still indignant about being called a liar. Shouldn't have lied then!
You're all over the place. I told you you're not black. You don't have to pretend to have a “big black dick.” Settle down, “Tyrone.” You're a terrible liar. “Obama hates white people!” is not something any black person would say. It's what Rush Limbaugh would say.
If you voted for Alan Keyes, you wouldn't spell his name phonetically. Lies nestled within lies.
See, the thing is, you're trying to gain credibility by posing as a black person. That way, you figure, people will give extra credence and weight to your attacks on Obama.
This is a standard birther trick. Some of you, like Randwulf, pose as military personnel, active duty or retired. Some of you claim to be Democrats who were loyal until they heard Obama is a socialist, and now they cannot abide him anymore. Not very convincing.
So….where does that leave us? Oh yeah. You're a bad liar and I'm amused by your overreaction. The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
We need a name for you. The one you chose for yourself sucks. Some sort of reference to the year America got independence. Yeah. That's really important to black people. Stands out vividly in our minds. Like Juneteenth. So what's a good name for a doofy white guy posing as a black guy?
You are henceforth “Whitebread Tyrone.”
Oh, and Whitebread Tyrone, what's with the statements posed as questions? You write like an idiot? Like you don't know what you are saying? And I believe you are sincere? Doofus.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 10:58 am
“I'm not a racist. Some of my best friends are you people.” — Classic racist line
“I'm not a racist. Just in the last year, three black people have been in my house.” (D.L. Hughley, who goes on to say “if you know how many black people been in your house in the last year, you racist like a muthafucka…”)
You're a good sport, Joker. Kind of you to let us know that you know 2 black people who didn't get wherever they are in life by suckling at the welfare teat.
I know a lot of blacks like the ones you describe. One of them has a funny name. Hard to pronounce. I'll sound it out for you.
Prez-o-dent.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:05 pm
Little stevie, could you please explain how a statute law enacted in 1982 can replace statute law prevailing in, say, 1961, so that looking at Hawaii state statute law in 2009 would leave the impression that measures covered under statute law prior to 1982 can be lied about by a lawyer “giving cover” to a feloniously criminal Mombasa Messiah today?
Thanks!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:18 am
Yeah. See, Whitebread Tyrone, this is why I told you that you're a liar.
Black people don't write things like “flaming faggot.” Nor do they write things like “twisted fudgepacker.” Definitely not “sicko communist penis smoker.”
You know who writes things like that?
Well, another of your quotes provides a telling hint:
“Back in the closet!”
Let us know when you come out, Whitebread Tyrone.
When you do, let's hope you have blown your nose. It started running during your tear-filled foot-stomping rant.
I think you may have soiled yourself when the fussing got good to you. Do you need to borrow a change of panties from randypuppy?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:20 am
Nah. Little stevie, you post the same old “talking points” you've been getting in your “left-wing blogger” email push from Messiah Central, layer upon layer of Obamaphile “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!” lawyerly lie-for-a-living obfuscation, dancing frantically around the simple fact that every minute of every day this “birther” business goes on, more and more of the the American people are looking at Barry Soetoro, thinking about standing in line at the DMV with their own birth certificates in their hands, and wondering:
“Just what the hell has he got in his birth certificate that he wouldn't just hand it over and be done with all this shit?”
Well, there's that vision in your mind's eye, little stevie, of your Mombasa Messiah getting perp-walked out of the White House by federal marshals, his wrists cuffed behind him and fastened to that belly chain, shuffling in ankle fetters, his Secret Service detail glancing all around in confusion and alarm, the Marine guards at the gate grinning from ear to ear and nodding knowingly.
Keeps you up all goddam night lately, doesn't it?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:22 am
Your panties are showing.
I'm not worried about you, Tyrone. Get that through your dented skull.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:26 am
I'm sorry, test-taker. I found it hard to give your paranoid insults my usual full attention.
I'm distracted by the fact that randypuppy thinks I'm David Wiegel, Private Joker thinks I'm also jimpa, and Whitebread Tyrone thinks I'm the anti-Christ and he hopes I'm available on Wednesday night.
But now that I re-read your post, I don't see any of your beloved “content.” Just more whiny questions about what President Obama could be hiding.
When you have something to SHOW us, rather than something to speculate that Obama COULD BE hiding, let me know. Until then, I'll be paying attention to the Three Stooges behind the curtain. Especially Whitebread Tyrone. He seems like he needs round-the-clock observation.
Oh and thanks for inquiring after my sleeping habits. Slept like a baby last night. Woke up quite late, in fact. Thanks for lookin' out, wretch.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:37 am
All that's necessary is the question, little stevie.
A question arrogantly unanswered by your “privileged” Mombasa Messiah, a reasonable request made by millions of American citizens to which you have stated your beloved Barry is “immune,” a constitutional concern which you have repeatedly dismissed as “racist,” and in all ways, all forms, all your posts in these fora ducked and dodged and fribbled and weaseled away from.
I'm just lovin' it, stevie. You're the sparkling poster child for socialist bullshit, racist politics, and Barry Soetoro's utter contempt for rule of law.
Favoring, instead, rule of lawyers.
Y'know. Those fancy lawyer tricks he's either paid for with money tracked by the FEC (long after the conclusion of his campaign) or received as gifts-of-service from high-powered law firms all over the country, quashing citizens' suits with procedural hand-waves in order to avoid substantive address of that one, simple, but absolutely fatal (for Barry) issue.
His qualification as a natural born citizen of these United States to be destroying this nation from that comfy seat behind the Resolute desk.
And I'm sure you'd “Slept like a baby last night.” Incontinent of urine and feces, right? Those horrible dreams of your beloved Barry on his way to the prison laundry at Leavenworth and his close encounter with all those Aryan Nation types in the storage room….
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 11:45 am
“Wrong again, Zod.” — Man of Steel talking to, who else? Zod.
I'm sure you're just lovin' it. I already told you I know that you enjoy being insulted.
What I don't know is whether you enjoy reading the insults applied to other people. I'm sure you root for randypuppy to get something right one of these days. Didn't your heart just break when he fucked up the “Judge Souter” thing”
Wouldn't you have given a kidney to be able to tell Private Joker that I'm not two people?
Don't you want to get a good stiff drink ready when you see that Whitebread Tyrone is all wound up and ready to fuss?
You and I have gone around and around about Obama. You can pretend I've been evasive. It's ok. We know, and everyone else knows, that I've posted the law and the facts and the analysis OVER AND OVER.
I am not the one keeping the original birth certificate from you. And you are never going to be the one who leads a lawsuit to get it.
The Constitution is what is keeping it from you. Tenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, take your pick.
Obama hasn't shown it to you, or anyone else, because he does not have to, and he sees political advantage in not doing so. Anyone who paid attention to how he ran his campaign and how he has thus far run his Presidency has to admit, however grudgingly, that the man is pragmatic.
He also has, as you note, a thorough grasp of the legal system. He knows very well that he does not have to reveal something that the Constitution and his home state both expressly permit him to keep private.
You know that there's no law supporting you. You know that there are no facts supporting you.
That is why you pound the table.
And that is why I'd rather talk about how fucking hilarious the Three Stooges are. Well, not so much Private Joker darpot. Kid follows me around like a sad-eyed orphan.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 4:52 pm
–”Kind of you to let us know that you know 2 black people who didn’t get wherever they are in life by suckling at the welfare teat.”–
I said “Two friends of mine”. I don’t consider everybody I know “friends”.
And I was limiting it to two friends who were “proof” — because they did fall for the Liberal promoted “idea” that “they cannot help themselves”.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:00 pm
–”You’re still writing about a Hawai’ian STATE senator. And he doesn’t have a bill.”–
No sh!t Sherlock.
–”He is talking about his plans to have a bill. Next year.”–
No sh!t Sherlock.
–”Even if the bill was passed, it would not apply to the President. Ex post facto and all that.”–
If the bill passed as the Senator described it, it would allow the release of Obama’s birth records. IF it turned out his birth records did show Obama was not born in Hawaii, the already existing laws would apply to Obama. The fact that the new law allows people to verify the facts has nothing to do with “Ex post facto and all that”.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:08 pm
–”Not sure why you are compelled to post the same thing three times on such an obscure issue as a nonexistent potential bill…”–
First off, I only posted twice and they were two different articles with different information.
Second, you are the one who ask for a link to the information. Then didn’t like the link, so I gave you another one.
–”If you didn’t think the text was provocative, why did you post the text in addition to the link? Did you not think it proved your point?”–
You have gone over the deep end. I posted the text merely as trying to have a civil discussion. If you note, I said nothing about trying to prove a point one way or the other. You are the one who ask for the link and I tried to help.
–”You never answered my serious questions to you about your selective sensitivity…”
Why should I? You ignore questions I have put forth to you.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 5:35 pm
–”Well, not so much Private Joker darpot. Kid follows me around like a sad-eyed orphan.”–
Nobody has to follow Mr. Ego around. You post so much sh!t in here, people can’t help but step on you!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:19 pm
Steve, the way the law works in Hawaii right now is that anyone can request their own birth record. In addition, a parent or child may request a BC for child or parent respectively. Of course, in most cases they would have (since 2001) issued a computer generated COLB but, up until last fall, you could request a photocopy of the original for an additional service fee. It was allowed in the case of a court ordered release of birth records of children who had been adopted and never knew their biological parents but who were trying to find out more about their biological family information for personal or simply genealogical research. Since this Obama flap started, a person can no longer see or handle or get a photocopy of their OWN original BC. This is only so Hawaii can continue to claim that they ONLY RELEASE COMPUTER GENERATED COLBs. So nobody can see their original now. How’s that?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
Bullsht. Liberals don’t claim that “they cannot help themselves”.
Typical rightwing strawman argument.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:49 pm
Huh? You seem to have some basic misunderstanding of the linearity of time. I cannot say that I am surprised at all.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 6:54 pm
Lol. Every time you debuk a birther, they change the subject only to get debunked again.
If Obama was indeed born in Kenya, provide some legitimate evidence or kindly STFU.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:21 pm
to stephenperry, you lied? well this is the info I got,will share.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:23 pm
mine is, it's at the county registry and i'm not ashamed about it,both long and short forms.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:28 pm
well mine is in public records and I'm not afraid of showing who I am,But it also shows who I'm not.Like anything in life it has ups and downs. Have you ever been in a county registry? You just don't go in ther and get people documents and walk out,no,no,no,you can look at the documents,but taking them you will find it's not as easy as you may think.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:39 pm
No. I didn't lie. Thanks for asking.
When you share your info, include the source, please. This means post a link. It does not mean “Aunt Gladys told me.”
von Einstein, I'm beginning to think you're a parody. I wish you were, so that it wouldn't be quite so sad. You're getting humiliated here.
You just type gibberish with no sources and no evidence. You immediately get shot down. You come back with “there's alot [sic] more in store that you don't know about.”
Yawn.
Wake me up when you get your big brother to help you do research and your little sister to help you proofread.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
Did anyone ever notice that the lower the price of bananas goes, the more time Steviemonkey has to compose these columns of meaningless drivel? He can't make a good, logical point of explaining why his Lord and Master, won't produce proof that he is an American, but he will go on and on with these silly simian semantics ravings. It's like a bee buzzing around in a mason jar. Just annoying and pointless noise and flapping. And it won't save his Mombasa Messiah (Thanks Tuci!) anyway. Its only a matter of time Baboonsquirt! The truth will destroy Obama once it is known. He won't be able to survive life in the light. He has always slithered from one dark place to the next, hiding every truth of his miserable existence and pretending to be something he is not.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:52 pm
Big talk from a guy who thinks I'm David Weigel.
You wouldn't know a good, logical point if it shoved a banana up your ass, randypuppy.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 2:57 pm
Luckily, you aren't afraid of showing who you are.
Like you've done in all your posts. Judging by said posts, you are a functionally illiterate 9 year old.
“You just don't go in ther and” start making up new words.
You can try to lie about who you are, and you can try to make up shit about what the facts and law surrounding the birther conspiracy theory are, but fooling us, “you will find it's not as easy as you may think.”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
You sure do have a fixation about things being put into rectums! You fudge packing, mongrel freak. Get the fuck off the thread, stinking little slimeball. You said you wouldn't call me gay because it would be an insult to all your gay friends. I'll bet all your lovers (if anyone could stand to be with you) and most of your friends (if anyone could stand to be around you at all) have been gay! Anyone else that you have ever inflicted your presence upon has probably just kicked your ass and sent you back to ACORN's (or your mommies basement) to angrily peck away on your ersatz bravery machine. And I DO think you are David Weigel. Or the two of you just get together to…….How you say? Oh yes, have him shove “a banana up your ass”!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:05 pm
What Hawaiian “Long Form” Certificates of Live Birth look like.
Here is one side by side with Obama’s “CertiFICATION”
http://www.youdecidepolitics.com/wp-content/upl…
A blank one.
http://www.cfourstrategies.com/colb.jpg
Some guy named Alan 1963
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
One of the Nordyke twins from 1961 (a day after Obama)
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-content/upl…
An anonymous one from 1978. Yep still using the long form in 1978!
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/HawaiinBirt…
Only doctor signed birth certificate yet to surface for Obama but this could be a forgery.
http://patriotpost.us/images/broadcasts/humor/i…
Oh, yes, and then there is this “Certification” from 2008 which has not been seen or handled outside of any of the Obama friendly sources that have posted different versions using scans and digital photos posted on line. This is all Obama has ever offered as proof that he was born on US soil. Notice there is no mention of a hospital or the name of any attending physician. Hawaii has now admitted that an original long form exists or have lied and said there is one when there isn’t. Since it has never been posted or released by Obama, there is no way to know what it might say. But here is what Obama’s people offer. Again, Obama’s alleged “CertificATION”of Live Birth (probably a forgery)
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/20…
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
Hey! Are those real, Hawaiian, long form, original, DOCTOR witnessed and signed, HOSPITAL, prepared, birth certificates like they issued back in the early 1960's when Obama was born?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:10 pm
Yes Randwulf, they certainly are! And my understanding is that anyone born in Hawaii would have been issued one at the hospital and a copy would still be on file in the Hawaiian Office of Vital Statistics.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
So, if you were born in Hawaii, you can just request one if you want to have a copy?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
No. I said I wouldn't call you a faggot.
Gay is fine. I checked.
Knowing that you don't like my posts, and knowing that you don't want me here, makes all this bullshit I have to read from you totally worthwhile.
See, when I first got here and saw all that bullshit posturing you do, monkeyfucker, I realized that you needed special attention. You wrote all that crap about monkeys. You thought you were clever. You were being a racist shit for brains.
And now you're wallowing in it. I'm not about to let up.
You don't like it? Marvelous. I couldn't be more pleased. You got a problem with that? YOU “get the fuck off this thread.”
The day I take orders from a pussy (oh I said I wouldn't call you that because of my reverence for pussy, but I checked with pussy and pussy is cool with it) like you is the day that Obama turns over his original birth certificate.
Glad to know “[my] insults could never affect [you] in the slightest.” Just another in your endless stream of bullshit you didn't mean.
I am also glad to know that you still haven't looked up “ersatz.” Probably shouldn't use words you don't know. But then that would leave you with the following four words:
“Chongo”
“Monkeyfucker”
“Rectal”
“Bleeding”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:15 pm
Well, Randwulf….this is where it really gets weird. You see, since Obama has never produce his long form, the state of Hawaii has adopted this new policy of saying that they can only release these abbreviated, computer generated, short forms that don't contain all the pertinent information to determine exactly where and under what circumstances a person was born. And apparently, they won't even allow the President of the United States to get a copy of his because of this new policy.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:17 pm
Well, that is just fucking crazy! A state public records office that has the original documents in their files but won't allow access or copies of them? Why on earth would they have such a strange policy?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:17 pm
Monkeyfucker! Has it really come to this? Have you come totally unhinged?
I thought your train went off the rails when you wrote about killing us all.
I was sure you were cracking when you thought I fucked up your silly crackpot links.
I laughed when you thought I was David Weigel.
But now…
You're posting to yourself. AND ANSWERING YOURSELF BACK.
“Are my fingers covered in monkey feces?”
“Yes Randwulf they certainly are.”
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:19 pm
“Well, Randwulf….this is where it really gets weird.”
Nope. It got weird about two weeks ago, when you sat there sobbing about how “American is lost.”
Now it's downright sur-FUCKING-real.
What a wonderful day this is turning out to be. Sun is shining and randypuppy is completely losing what was left of his monkey-addled mind.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:22 pm
“Well, that is just fucking crazy!”
Sure is. Batshit.
But I never told you to have a back-and-forth conversation with yourself in front of people you accuse of “fucking with your links” when you're on a paranoid Squishy Bender.
If you were right, and someone WAS fucking with your links, do you suppose that giving public evidence of your weak-minded insanity would cause them to stop?
Wouldn't they just keep fucking with your links, and maybe make your garage door opener turn off your refrigerator, just to see you blame it on the dog?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:22 pm
Well, that's great for you, but so great for everybody else. I have nothing to hide about my medical history, but I still don't want my medical records to be accessible by anyone off the street. I have nothing to hide about my criminal background, but that doesn't mean that I want just anyone to be able do a background check on me.
Some things about a person's life should only be revealed on a need-to-know basis, not a want-to-know basis. It's unfair to Hawaii's private citizens to putt their privacy at risk because the birthers won't accept reality.
And even the law IS passed, the birthers won't be satisfied. To them, this'll just be more evidence of the conspiracy that they believe so strongly in. They'll ignore the fact that this law is being passed in an attempt end this nonsense and bring them back to reality…just another inconvenient fact that they'll have to work around, I guess.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:25 pm
Well how would you be able to find out if someone was in fact really born in Hawaii without actually seeing the information on the complete original birth certificate?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:26 pm
That's the problem Randwulf, without the long form, you can't know for sure, one way or the other.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:27 pm
oooh ooooh aaaaah aaaaah eeeee eeeee tuki tuki!!!!!!!!!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:28 pm
Hey, you weren't invited to this conversation. Go eat a bug Chongo!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
Hey Steviemonkey! Thank your uncle for letting me use his picture in my profile. Okay? Thanks!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:31 pm
See, this is what happens when randypuppy lets the monkey talk during sex.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
Wow. Your zinger sure beats my calling your punk ass out for writing to yourself!
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:34 pm
Holy split personalities Batman!
Professional help would perhaps be something for you to consider at this point…?
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:37 pm
You didn't invite yourself either. Yet you started talking to yourself.
So…I cannot write to you on this public comment board if you say I cannot, huh?
Tell me, does your Treehouse Players' Club have posted rules? I bet I know a few:
1. What happens in the Treehouse Players' Club…stays in the Treehouse Players' Club.
2. No monkey shall be competent to testify against Randwulf in any criminal proceeding involving allegations of Randwulf-monkey intercourse.
3. Pick up after yourself. No one likes walking through a pile of monkey shit…on accident. We all like to do it on purpose or we wouldn't have formed this awesome club!
4. One hand washes the other. We tell Mom the screaming noises mean we're doing “research.” You monkeys go along. Bananas keep showing up in the mail. Everyone wins.
5. Shower off with the side yard garden hose before re-entering the house. No exceptions. Once you have spent enough time around monkeys, you don't notice when you smell like monkey semen.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:41 pm
mystylplx, I think this one just burned out completely!
“I can't help feeling somehow partially responsible.” — Bart Simpson
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:46 pm
I hear his neighbors are all shocked. They say he was such a quiet, well behaved monkey.
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:47 pm
I've been up for a while, had a couple of Jamaican Blue Mtn french-pressed mugs of java and STILL can't for the life of me figure out the how and why of a he/she w/a nic of 'Golem Cohen' gets off on calling someone a 'Zionist punk'.
you 'know' (?) 'Zionism is the international political movement that originally supported the reestablishment of a homeland for the Jewish People in Palestine.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism
right?
so… help me out here? i don't understand the relevance to a guy w/screen name 'StephenPerry' (myfirst thought is Aerosmith and 'Crazy' – cuz YOU ain't 'computing' even twisted up on Jamaican Highland coffee, mr/ms 'cohen)
http://www.songarea.com/mc/14/aerosmith.html
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:48 pm
http://www.songarea.com/mc/14/aerosmith.html
'crazy is as crazy does'
go figure and, enjoy this link to Aerosmith's 'Crazy', stephenperry
Comment posted August 8, 2009 @ 3:54 pm
Hawaii state statute law. Privacy protection. Barry Soetoro could easily give his permission for the government of the state of Hawaii to release all this information – everything that Dr. Fukino has publicly stated gives her cause to believe that Barry was, indeed born somewhere – but for some strange reason, Barry doesn't want to do that.
Neither do Barry's Obamaphile fellahin. They want the Sacred Information kept hidden from all infidels, secure for the next 7.5 years, so that their Messiah – may Allah preserve Him! – will be able to continue in office and even get re-elected (like that's gonna happen with him fucking up the economy by the Marx-and-Enge
rss