<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Can Enforce Iran Sanctions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/53567/who-can-enforce-iran-sanctions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/53567/who-can-enforce-iran-sanctions</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mills</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/53567/who-can-enforce-iran-sanctions/comment-page-1#comment-62144</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=53567#comment-62144</guid>
		<description>Robert Naiman&#039;s article in The Huffington Post is interesting and covers why a gas embargo on Iran is a bad idea. In addition to lack of support, which is covered here, he also mentions increased gas prices in the U.S. (which would have political implications for Obama) and a possible Iran retaliation by stopping its oil exports to the West. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/mr-mousavis-gas-embargo-o_b_251938.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/mr-...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Naiman&#39;s article in The Huffington Post is interesting and covers why a gas embargo on Iran is a bad idea. In addition to lack of support, which is covered here, he also mentions increased gas prices in the U.S. (which would have political implications for Obama) and a possible Iran retaliation by stopping its oil exports to the West. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/mr-mousavis-gas-embargo-o_b_251938.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/mr-&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizzieb23</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/53567/who-can-enforce-iran-sanctions/comment-page-1#comment-57743</link>
		<dc:creator>lizzieb23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=53567#comment-57743</guid>
		<description>Gee, the Iranians insist on keeping their right to manufacuture their own nuclear reactor fuel because they are concerned about politically-motivated energy cutoffs and sanctions ... and here we are, proving them right by threatening to cut off their energy imports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, the Iranians insist on keeping their right to manufacuture their own nuclear reactor fuel because they are concerned about politically-motivated energy cutoffs and sanctions &#8230; and here we are, proving them right by threatening to cut off their energy imports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe China And Russia Will Go Along With It If We Give Them A Pony &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/53567/who-can-enforce-iran-sanctions/comment-page-1#comment-57782</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe China And Russia Will Go Along With It If We Give Them A Pony &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=53567#comment-57782</guid>
		<description>[...] Spencer Ackerman: Why would Russia and China agree to such a package? And why would, say, the United Nations agree to a move that would push the Iranians to dare the international community to confront it militarily over a global economic chokepoint? The smart people quoted in Sanger’s piece make the case for the sanctions by saying that the Iranian regime is more vulnerable to sanctions now, after the theft of the June 12 elections exposed popular anger and antipathy toward it, but not how to make those sanctions feasible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spencer Ackerman: Why would Russia and China agree to such a package? And why would, say, the United Nations agree to a move that would push the Iranians to dare the international community to confront it militarily over a global economic chokepoint? The smart people quoted in Sanger’s piece make the case for the sanctions by saying that the Iranian regime is more vulnerable to sanctions now, after the theft of the June 12 elections exposed popular anger and antipathy toward it, but not how to make those sanctions feasible. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

