Publisher: Obama Should Produce Original Birth Certificate

At StatePaper.com, we know by making this statement we will be instantly tagged as “racist,” “birther,” or other pejorative terms by those who defend the President of the United States. We often defend the President and the job he is doing and are regularly lambasted for being “too liberal” or an “Obama lover” by some of our most prolific critics.

The fact in question here is the constitutional qualification of the President of the United States to hold office. With a simple nod, the President could offer the American people the best evidence, the source document(s), as he learned about at Harvard, and dispel those who question his birth as a natural born citizen. His failure to provide this best evidence, when it could be so easily done, raises only more questions, which fuels an ugly public debate.

And now we've got a “Liberal” Nebraska newspaper advising Barry to cough up his birth certificate. I guess our Mombsa Messiah is losing even the root weevils.

If he can. Anybody ready yet to watch our TelePrompTer-in-Chief taking the Fifth?

Aw!

Sure makes you writhe and spume and sputter like a Baptist confronted with a porn store in his neighborhood, doesn't it?

There is only one person here who is angry and that is continuously you. I've been alternately laughing at you and shaking my head in sadness or in just complete disbelief that there are people like you that are so utterly consumed by useless hate. You have nothing to offer here but ranting and whining and childish but ultimately harmless and silly little taunts.

If you hadn't noticed, this thread has otherwise been dead for over a day. The only back and forth has been between us and there is nothing new or of value coming from this conversation, so I'm done here with you and there is no point of wasting time on this or you any further.

All that I've learned from this is that you are not someone who is just going to be unhappy and have difficulty accepting the next 4-8 years, but someone who is terminally unhappy and will probably remain disappointed and miserable for the rest of your life.

I “contribute to society” (I suppose; point to something concrete, G-job, and say “that's society,” willya?) just as I've contributed all my life. What do you do? Work at the DMV?

About as virulently un-American as it's possible to get. “Obedience to the state” my ass!

And of course I “don't respect the democratic process and…don't respect the will of the voters.” When the hell has the majority ever been right on anything?

Throughout the history of these United States, the popular majority has fucked up every goddam time they've gotten their way. I quote:

“Laws are no longer made by a rational process of public discussion; they are made by a process of blackmail and intimidation, and they are executed in the same manner. The typical lawmaker of today is a man wholly devoid of principle — a mere counter in a grotesque and knavish game. If the right pressure could be applied to him, he would be cheerfully in favor of polygamy, astrology or cannibalism.

“It is the aim of the Bill of Rights, if it has any remaining aim at all, to curb such prehensile gentry. Its function is to set a limitation upon their power to harry and oppress us to their own private profit The Fathers, in framing it, did not have powerful minorities in mind; what they sought to hobble was simply the majority. But that is a detail. The important thing is that the Bill of Rights sets forth, in the plainest of plain language, the limits beyond which even legislatures may not go. The Supreme Court, in Marbury v. Madison, decided that it was bound to execute that intent, and for a hundred years that doctrine remained the corner-stone of American constitutional law.” (H.L. Mencken)

So laugh all you want, putzie. If eventually you do learn “the proper role of government in civil society,” you will be as dead to your “Liberal” sputniki as if you had suddenly taken a bullet to what you're presently using in lieu of a brain, and you will be gripped by such a paroxysm of shame and remorse that I expect you to be wearing the mental equivalent of sackcloth and ashes for the rest of your miserable life.

I do find it amusing this pretentious “wrapping yourself in the flag” argument that you haters make while at the same time you can't accept the results of a duly won election, just because you don't like who won. So you don't respect the democratic process and you don't respect the will of the voters and you really don't seem much interested in civil society. So yes, I do dismiss you as simple xenophobic hatred and it comes across as you just trying to couch it in something else to justify your feelings.

Your “simply destroy you” attack I'll just dismissively laugh off. That is great that you feel the need to have to portray yourself as so smugly superior to the rest of the world and that is your right, but I'm not going to play along. It just comes off as someone trying to fluff themselves up to cover up for their own insecurities to me. Go live your life in peace. If you are unhappy with elected officials, get involved yourself and run for office. There are lots of viable 3rd-parties out there and do your best to sell your views and solutions to the voters. That is the proper role of government in civil society, so if you truly care about it so much, then participate instead of just pontificate.

But of what I have, G, you and your fellow Obamaphile fellahin neither want nor value nor even remotely understand anything beyond what you would like to dismiss as simple xenophobic hatred. I've come to the conclusion that if specimens such as yourself could really perceive the motivations of a constitutionalist – and I suppose it's possible, but with your thought-blocking predispositions, it ain't at all likely – it would be impossible for you to acknowledge such motivations, as for you even to honestly consider their quality and character would necessarily oblige to put your own against them in comparison, and that would simply destroy you.