Yoo’s Personal Lawyer Will Be Paid by Taxpayers

By
Monday, July 27, 2009 at 12:01 pm

Buried in a profile of the controversial former Justice Department lawyer John Yoo in today’s Washington Post is the casual mention that the Justice Department is no longer representing Yoo to fight a lawsuit filed against him by Jose Padilla. Instead, GOP-connected lawyer and former Bush appellate court nominee Miguel Estrada has stepped into the DOJ’s shoes.

As I’ve explained before, the government’s decision to defend Yoo against charges he violated Padilla’s civil rights by authorizing abusive interrogation and detention policies was highly controversial, given that the government itself is no longer defending those tactics, and Yoo’s best defense may be that he was just following orders — from other DOJ or White House officials.

So earlier this month, Justice Department lawyers, who were representing Yoo in the pending case despite the serious potential conflicts of interest, told a federal judge in a court filing in San Francisco that “private counsel will be assuming representation of Mr. Yoo” in his appeal. Yoo and his government lawyers in June lost their attempt to have the case dismissed by a district court judge.

The case, brought by Padilla and his mother, claims Yoo violated Padilla’s civil rights by authorizing the government’s terrorist-detention policies and treating Padilla, an American citizen, as an “enemy combatant.”

By pulling out of Yoo’s defense, the Justice Department has now spared itself from having to defend Yoo’s expansive and much-criticized views of executive power, which would have been an embarrassment to the Obama administration.  And as Carrie Johnson of The Washington Post notes, it also frees Yoo to point the finger at other former government officials he might say were giving him orders — notably Vice President Dick Cheney, President George W. Bush, adviser David Addington and then-White House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales. That would be a sticky, if not impossible, argument for government lawyers to have made.

Yoo hasn’t completely lost his government support, though. His choice of private counsel, who’s defended Yoo in such sticky controversies before, is Miguel Estrada, a former Bush nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit whose appointment was quashed in 2003 by Senate Democrats — a point harped on by Republicans during the recent confirmation hearing of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. Estrada’s fees will be paid by U.S. taxpayers.

Justice Department spokesperson Tracy Schmaler explained to The Recorder that this “is normal practice when the potential exists for disagreement between the government and the defendant over complex legal questions.”

Comments

4 Comments

Swami_Binkinanda
Comment posted July 27, 2009 @ 11:47 pm

Psycho defends psycho in the nuthouse of pretend justice.


Bijan
Comment posted July 28, 2009 @ 5:53 pm

Although the entire matter could be no more then a political theater play…, but I think Yoo has to save his name and name others for what’s been his legalization and thereby a functional system in starting a new era in American fascism…, those who his been defending until now.., in another word.., the militarism regime from the Ronald Regan era and beyond.. That is to say.. A regime behind what is called the “rightwing governments” who control the system…, like bankers the billionaires and those who brought us the present recession and Etc .., a system which we have seen since Vietnam war yet not able to control until the Iraq and Afghanistan war. But personally I think Yoo and people like him are no more then a mimics in what is a neo-fascism. Hopefully the people have defeated them for now…


DarcyKitchin
Comment posted November 2, 2009 @ 11:18 am

It's great that they finally thought to form a comity for minor planning applications?. As owner of a small business I now have more opportunities and the time until I can get started is a lot shorter. I am building and other small metallic structures but not for the municipality because it took to long to get a project started. Now it will be a lot easier.


DarcyKitchin
Comment posted November 2, 2009 @ 4:18 pm

Human rights is an issue we often hear about but not every one knows what these are. I was looking for a new job and I found an employer that stated in the employment agreement that I'd have to under take regular drug tests in order to keep my job. Although I am not a drug user it seemed ridiculous to accept such tests. After asking my lawyer about it I found out that this is actually a violation of basic human rights.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.