Comments on: U.S. Will Transfer Gitmo Child Soldier to Civilian Court, But Still Won’t Let Him Go

By: mbt sandals

mbt sandals — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:49:34 +0000

Thank you for your sharing.I'm very interested in it.

By: cheap mbt shoes

cheap mbt shoes — Wed, 19 May 2010 05:56:28 +0000

Thanks for you share the article.Good!

By: mbt shoes

mbt shoes — Mon, 10 May 2010 05:52:24 +0000

DO you like it?

By: Obama preparing to reassert presidential authority and reaffirm indefinite detention - Page 4 - FlyerTalk Forums

Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:51:28 +0000

[...] [...]

By: milman1

milman1 — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:44:04 +0000

Ah, Jason Baur, the simple fact of the matter is that you should demand to testify and put this to rest. You have your identity masked as Soufan did. The government has adopted a program of hiding evidence and requesting multiple continuances. If you truthfully have something to add, why hid?

If you want rely on others to “ask you” then you are circumventing the defense discovery request and you know it. Enjoy life on the dark side and know you are part of what followed for Jawad. I'm sure you can justify your position, but is that really all that matter's?

By: Mr. Jason

Mr. Jason — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:31:42 +0000

coward? Where'd that come from milkman1…
I don't need to come anywhere. If the government wanted us to testify, they knew where to find us. We offered our services and they didn't respond.

By: bruno2u

bruno2u — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:54:31 +0000

Sounds like Mr Jason should offer his name and tell us how badly this KID was beaten. Guess they have to get him anyway they can. I don't believe anything without proof. How many cases has the DOJ lost now?

By: bruno2u

bruno2u — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:28:38 +0000

The Department of Justice is now the Department of Injustice? Get a grip fokes, we could all be in danger of getting thrown in jail with this new type of prosecution. Federal Courts can handle these things. Maintaining human rights is essential to our freedoms. If he was tortured into a confession we are wrong, regardless. My family supports and is in the military. My family supports the constitution and the Geneva Convention.

By: aussielawyer

aussielawyer — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:21:47 +0000

Daphne says, “The only way the government’s latest claim makes sense is if it’s now saying that throwing a grenade at U.S. soldiers is not a crime of war, but an ordinary criminal offense. But if that’s the case, then why did the U.S. government hold him for six and a half years at Guantanamo Bay as an enemy combatant?”

Well,exactly! Throwing a grenade at a US soldier may be evidence of combatancy entitling Jawad to be held under the laws of war until the war is over, but it could never be the basis for a “war crime”. In fact it is difficult to imagine a more paradigmatic example of a classic act of war which cannot be charged as a “war crime”, than throwing a grenade at a soldier (as opposed to a civilian). But the Bush lawyers weren't following the Geneva Conventions. Wake up! The answer to Daphne's question is obvious.

Strange that the reporter and the person commenting both act as though it were actually somehow possible under the law of war – the REAL law, not George Bush's or Congress's – to charge the throwing of a grenade at a US soldier (as opposed to a civilian) as some sort of “war crime.”

By: milman1

milman1 — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:19:13 +0000

Stop being a coward and come forward Jason. Didn't think so.