http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coCDRfh0AWg

And what makes you think that “true conservatives” aren't ALSO “attacking” your beloved Mombasa Messiah “on policy grounds”?

Why wait for “next time” to throw your sordid sonofabitch out of the White House?

As for what the “highly qualified professionals at Reason” would or would not “be happy to be associated with” when it comes to chucking “Brickbats” at statist sonsofbitches like Barry Soetoro, I assure you that it's only a matter of degree, not intention.

I take a rather more National Lampoon/The Onion approach to treating with screaming socialists and similar authoritarian asswipes. Chacun à son goût and all that.

And all this noise about “treasonable” from an Obamaphile, who's asking everybody to set aside the stringencies of the U.S. Constitution in order that his witless fantasies of “Hope” and “Change” be fulfilled upon the corpse of government under rule of law….

Well, the appreciation of irony really isn't your strong suite, is it, wolfie?

A true conservative would be attacking Obama on policy grounds and working to get some else elected next time.

And “factually reporting” on anything pertaining to Barry Soetoro, his ignominious past, his sordid present, and his inmate future is nothing that his partisans – perhaps better to call them “fellahin” – desire.

In fact, the evasion of factuality and their “burden of proof” responsibility to demonstrate that their gadabout golliwog, Barry Soetoro, actually IS qualified to squat upon the Presidential crapper is the sum and substance of the Obamaphile noise yammering on this and other online fora.

My reason for taking Weigel to task on his “prostitute” status is that he is also a Contributing Editor for Reason magazine, a periodical which – I'm sure – you, wolfie, do not read and have almost certainly never heard of.

Were Mr. Weigel a genuinely libertarian individual, he would be delighting in this and all other opportunities to throw a handful of rocks into the meatgrinder through which your Mombasa Messiah is shoving this country. That he's working on this Web site to denigrate the “birthers” is indicative of a certain – well, let's call it “moral flexibility” on his part.

My background (ignominious as being “the VD doctor” was way back when) is pertinent to what I know of “sex workers” – that's the PC term nowadays, isn't it? – an issue raised in wolfie's spelling snerk above.

The clinic wasn't “STD specific” (it was a Health Underserved Rural Area [HURA] program established under Peanut-Boy's presidential administration), but we caught the dirty jobs in the proverbial tri-county area, and “VD clinic” was one of those dirty jobs.

And do I really need proof, zip? After all, “On the Internet, nobody can tell you're a dog.” Little stevie claims to be an ex-English major and a lawyer. Young jackie says she's a high-school teacher with a Master's in history. Who cares?

It's what goes up in the post, zipster. The CONTENT, not the curriculum vitae.

And what's wrong with my medical terminology? Jeez, I work mostly out of Stedman's, but I've also used Dorland's. What, you don't like either of those?

Just 'cause you find N. gonorrhoeae at Wikipedia (where they use “International English” – Brit-speak – instead of the American language) doesn't mean that N. gonococcus isn't a perfectly valid term for the pathogen. Check out the CDC Web site, why don'tcha?

If you're going to perpetuate a medical professional, learn the terminology. Better yet, grow up and stop lying to make yourself sound like something you're not.

I was the medical director of a Public Health Service clinic that had responsibility for handling sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in a three-county area for a couple of years. Got lots of “soiled doves” coming in with “gotta see the VD doctor” as their chief complaint.

Hell, kid. I not only “heard” of 'em but treated 'em. And their johns. And their johns' wives. Being an Obamaphile – and therefore terminally stupid – you almost certainly have no idea how fast N. gonococcus can gallop through a community.

You got content, doofus? No? Okay, on with working through the email. Nice interactive online CME presentation on first-line combination HAART in today's push from CCO….