<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Chief Blair Responds to Feingold on CIA&#8217;s &#8216;Significant Actions&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/52053/intel-chief-blair-responds-to-feingold-on-cias-significant-actions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/52053/intel-chief-blair-responds-to-feingold-on-cias-significant-actions</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgwhiteinfla</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/52053/intel-chief-blair-responds-to-feingold-on-cias-significant-actions/comment-page-1#comment-49746</link>
		<dc:creator>sgwhiteinfla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=52053#comment-49746</guid>
		<description>Sen Feingold just made DNI Blair bow down.  If it really was just a &quot;misunderstanding&quot; you have to wonder why Blair didn&#039;t come out with a clarification the day the WaPo story came out.  I am betting that he is probably hoping that nobody really covers his letter to Sen Feingold and instead relys on the WaPo&#039;s characterization of what he said.  Thanks for shining a light on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen Feingold just made DNI Blair bow down.  If it really was just a &#8220;misunderstanding&#8221; you have to wonder why Blair didn&#39;t come out with a clarification the day the WaPo story came out.  I am betting that he is probably hoping that nobody really covers his letter to Sen Feingold and instead relys on the WaPo&#39;s characterization of what he said.  Thanks for shining a light on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

