Palin Claimed Travel Expenses for Nights at Home

By
Tuesday, September 09, 2008 at 10:17 am

The Washington Post reports this morning that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin frequently billed the state a per diem — meant to cover travel expenses on official business — for nights spent at her family’s home in Wasilla, Alaska.

The state also picked up the tab for the first family’s travel expenses when accompanying Palin on state business — and at least once when Palin’s husband, Todd, traveled alone.

First, the most glaring item:

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has billed taxpayers for 312 nights spent in her own home during her first 19 months in office, charging a “per diem” allowance intended to cover meals and incidental expenses while traveling on state business…

She wrote some form of “Lodging — own residence” or “Lodging — Wasilla residence” more than 30 times at the same time she took a per diem, according to the reports. In two dozen undated amendments to the reports, the governor deleted the reference to staying in her home but still charged the per diem.

My job requires me to travel frequently, and I have some experience with claiming travel expenses. I often expense taxicabs to or from airports and the occasional hotel room. However, if I tried to claim, say, my apartment or meals I’ve had here in Phoenix as travel expenses, I would probably find myself unemployed very quickly.

But wait, there’s more. According to The Post, Alaska was billed more than $43,000 for travel by Palin’s husband and children. Palin’s spokeswoman, Sharon Leighow, defended the practice:

“As a matter of protocol, the governor and the first family are expected to attend community events across the state,” she said. “It’s absolutely reasonable that the first family participates in community events.”

The state finance director, Kim Garnero, said Alaska law exempts the governor’s office from elaborate travel regulations. Said Leighow: “The governor is entitled to a per diem, and she claims it…”

Asked Monday about the official policy on charging for children’s travel expenses, Garnero said: “We cover the expenses of anyone who’s conducting state business. I can’t imagine kids could be doing that.”

But Leighow said many of the hundreds of invitations Palin receives include requests for her to bring her family, placing the definition of “state business” with the party extending the invitation.

To be fair, Palin has greatly reduced her travel expenses compared to those of her predecessor, Gov. Frank Murkowski, who used the executive jet the state sold under Palin. However, The Post reports other governors have been more conservative with their per diem charges.

In the past, per diem claims by Alaska state officials have carried political risks. In 1988, the head of the state Commerce Dept. was pilloried for collecting a per diem charge of $50 while staying in his Anchorage home, according to local news accounts. The commissioner, the late Tony Smith, resigned amid a series of controversies.

“It was quite the little scandal,” said Tony Knowles, the Democratic governor from 1994 to 2000. “I gave a direction to all my commissioners if they were ever in their house, whether it was Juneau or elsewhere, they were not to get a per diem because, clearly, it is and it looks like a scam — you pay yourself to live at home,” he said.

Knowles, whose children were school-age at the start of his first term, said that his wife sometimes accompanied him to conferences overseas but that he could “count on one hand” the number of times his children accompanied him.

“And the policy was not to reimburse for family travel on commercial airlines, because there is no direct public benefit to schlepping kids around the state,” he said.

The article does not accuse Palin of wrongdoing. But, if she collected a per diem for 312 nights spent at her home, that’s more than half her total time as governor.

Some things are just basic cost of living. If regular, non-governing people couldn’t get away with it in their own lives, a governor who postures herself as a waste-cutting reformer should probably pay for her own expenses at home as well.

Comments

7 Comments

Richard
Comment posted September 9, 2008 @ 10:10 am

Ummm. Apparently she has an office in Anchorage but no government lodgings there. She could pay for a hotel or she could commute back to her home in Wasilla. She did the latter. And you're accusing her of not working for 300 days of her governorship? What idiocy!


Matthew DeLong
Comment posted September 9, 2008 @ 10:55 am

I certainly did not accuse her of not working for 300 days. I'm not sure why you think I di. Palin chooses to live in Wasilla, which my TWI colleague Laura McGann reports is a 45-minute drive from Anchorage, where her official duties require her to be. How many hundreds of thousands, or probably millions, of Americans commute 45 minutes to and from work each day without compensation? I fail to see why it is unreasonable to expect a public official who claims to be on a mission to save her state money to set an example and not bill the state for expenses that result from her choice to not live where she works. I would refer you to the quote from former Gov. Knowles, cited above.


oregonian
Comment posted September 9, 2008 @ 12:23 pm

if she was really a reformer, she'd have already asked the AK legislators to remove this 'pay yourself to live at home' opportunity from the books.

But alas, any pork that benefits *me* isn't really pork, now is it?


diesel mcfadden
Comment posted September 9, 2008 @ 8:31 pm

hey matt. well, one thing is that the state specifies her 'home' duty station is juneau and i suspect it'd cost the state more than $1800/mo (or $900 if she's claiming half the days) to run the mansion even if that was just the chef she got rid of.

Overall, on the per diems, I don't get it. Why wouldn't you claim a per diem you job rules say you're entitled to? She's clearly traveling 800 miles back and forth, so ONE of the residences is going to be considered 'away'. She has to eat.

The rules say (fin.admin.state.ak.us/dof/travel/resource/rates.pdf) if you have two residences, one is considered “home” and when you're at the other, you're considered traveling get a daily per diem (food, incidentals, $60/day). For the purposes of reimbursement, the state says the governor's home is Juneau. I suppose they could have done it the other way around and said her home is Wasilla and then she'd be collecting a per diem in the governor's mansion which probably would look just as silly.

I've been away on business a lot. It'd be really unfair to have to pay for your own food and expenses in all locations when you're traveling. Shouldn't the employer have to pay a per diem for food and incidentals in ONE of the locations (wasilla or juneau)?

As far as the kids and spouse goes, i guess it's based on the event. it's probably the same for all senators, governors, etc. it's not like it's going to look good for the country to send Biden or Obama stag to some official dinner event and save on the airfare for their wives either.

And I'd say it'd be just as wrong to expect obama to personally pay (instead of the campaign) for michelle and the kids to go to the dnc in denver. what do you think? am i off here?


of courseobama
Comment posted September 12, 2008 @ 2:50 am

May I also put on record the hotels she stayed at were around $700.00/night….real conservative fiscal spending there Sarah….you certainly have public service at heart….welcome to the new lottery…running for VP.


lovingit
Comment posted October 22, 2008 @ 4:39 pm

Holy Smoke, fiddling on expenses is shameful – and she calls herself a reformer – b*llsh*t, she's just shining it on while the good times last. Sorry Baby – they will soon be over and it will be sayonara to you.


lovingit
Comment posted October 22, 2008 @ 11:39 pm

Holy Smoke, fiddling on expenses is shameful – and she calls herself a reformer – b*llsh*t, she's just shining it on while the good times last. Sorry Baby – they will soon be over and it will be sayonara to you.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.