Is a Shift in Strategy for Fighting Foreclosures Ahead?
Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 9:02 am
Is the Obama administration planning a major shift in strategy for slowing the foreclosure rate? Reuters reported Tuesday that officials are mulling policies to let delinquent owners rent their homes back. On Monday, Reuters said the administration also was considering letting unemployed borrowers defer, delay or skip mortgage payments so they can stay in their homes.
Both ideas are interesting, if not outright promising. And as TWI reported on Monday, the time may be ripe for a shift in strategy in the housing crisis, which is only getting worse despite previous government efforts to curb foreclosures, such as loan modifications.
Reuters had only a few details of how the new ideas, which seem very much like trial balloons, might work.
First, on renting homes back:
Under one idea being discussed, delinquent homeowners would surrender ownership of their homes, but would continue to live in the property for several years, the sources told Reuters.
Officials are mulling several ideas on how to swap a homeowner’s loan for a rental lease without disrupting mortgage markets.
The government could pay mortgage service companies cash to take part in the program — or encourage lenders to sell the homes to a third party that would write rental agreements — under two scenarios under consideration.
Many non-profit agencies manage affordable properties and might be interested in partnering in such a rental program, said John Taylor, the president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.
On allowing unemployment homeowners loan breaks:
The (Obama Administration) official told Reuters it was reasonable for policymakers to consider options for loan forbearance — allowing borrowers to delay, defer or skip payments — that are more effective than those currently available in the private sector.
But the official said the idea, which is still evolving, was difficult from a policy perspective and carries potential hazards. It could help more people struggling with economic difficulty, but it also could create perverse incentives that distort the housing market, said the official, who did not want to speak on the record about internal administration debates.
The official said such a program would be in keeping with other measures to help workers who have lost jobs in the current recession.
At The Atlantic, Daniel Indiviglio was wary:
The logistics get ugly. How long do you allow deferrals for? If unemployment is likely to remain high for another six months, or a year, can you allow mortgage payment holidays to last that long? Maybe by perverse incentives, that source means that if the deferrals extended until employment is finally found, then people would have an incentive to remain unemployed. That’s easily remedied with a time limit, however. But then you also face the problem of just deferring many foreclosures, instead of preventing them: once that time limit expires, those homeowners might still be unemployed and unable to make payments.
Beyond the relative merits of these ideas, the bigger issue is that there’s a sense that it’s time to try some new and far more forceful tactics, even controversial ones. The New York Times today, for example, calls on the Obama administration to go forward some bold action on the economy.
Unemployment is rising. Foreclosures are surging. Lending is still constrained. So why exactly is the Obama administration waiting to act?
A stubborn lack of progress in stopping foreclosures clearly is pushing Washington to consider some stronger responses. Whatever bold action the administration might come up with will run into criticism and opposition. So be it. It’s a little late to get into philosophical discussions about the government’s correct role in propping up the economy. We no longer have the luxury of figuring out a strategy that keeps everyone happy. The time may have passed to ponder moral hazards. Foreclosures are spilling over onto everyone, and dragging the entire economy down, and not just in the short term. As housing expert Alan Mallach told TWI, we’re coming to the realization that we can’t “loan modify” our way out of this.
It’s time for the Obama administration to push forward with another strategy. Actually, as foreclosures pile up and neighborhoods suffer, it’s well past time.
3 Comments
Comment posted July 15, 2009 @ 4:16 pm
wow – the great government incentive to own houses grows even stronger.
and who will pay for this?
more importantly, what do those of us with student loans get? I'd love to skip a few payments.
Pingback posted July 17, 2009 @ 11:10 am
[...] Is a Shift in Strategy Fighting Foreclosures Ahead? [...]
Comment posted July 18, 2009 @ 11:17 pm
wall street lackeys now include the white house
When Geittner and Obama had the chance to push for loan modifications through the courts (bankruptcy judges)they chose wall street over main street. housing would have already started to recover if the legislation would have passed. Obama and Geittner chose to join a group of wall street lackeys – senators kyl, bayh, martinez,spectre and others rather than give homeowners a negotiating tool that would have been far more effective than anything thats been tried.Obama and Geittner are trying to save face by threatening the loan servicers (much the same way that they did with the banks that the taxpayers have bailed out)and no one is intimidated by this.The banking / mortgage interests are running this country and you can look at your elected officials campaign contributions to verify it. as long as wall street continues to pay for our elected officials votes- we don't stand a chance.perhaps next elections we (voters) should VOTE OUT all the incumbents and start over
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss