rssEvangelical Vote Enters the Race
Tuesday, September 09, 2008 at 5:58 am
- 24 Comments
Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska) (Zuma Press)
WASILLA, Alaska – Pastor Larry Kroon of the Wasilla Bible Church, where Gov. Sarah Palin attends services, calls on his congregation to make up their own minds about politics.
“I’m not the one you look to for policy—foreign, domestic or local,” Kroon said Sunday morning to a sea of 500 attendees. “I’m not the one you look to for analysis.”
Instead, Kroon challenges church members to hold him to task on his core religious mission, to help them discover the “wonder, glory and mystery of Jesus.” Though Kroon has said he does not push an ideological perspective, when the church faithful study the Bible, they tend to see the world through a conservative lens.
Palin has also been a member of the Assembly of God Church, where she gave a talk in June to high-school students urging them to pray that an Alaska gas pipeline and the war in Iraq fulfill “God’s will.”
In tapping Palin, who is ardently pro-life, Sen. John McCain’s Republican presidential campaign is hoping to galvanize the evangelical base of the party. Since Palin joined the ticket, all indications show that the Alaska maverick has lit a fire under the sleeping giant of the GOP Christian conservative base that had so far shown lackluster support for McCain. Evangelicals, who have often been overlooked in this campaign cycle, are suddenly becoming a critical demographic — thanks to Palin.
Bridging the “enthusiasm divide,” Palin has not entirely spelled doom for Sen. Barack Obama, who has some religious support of his own among progressive evangelicals.
Illustration by: Matt Mahurin
But the Palin pick did boost McCain’s efforts to court the religious right, regarded as among his biggest weaknesses. Back in 2006, McCain was accused of flip-flopping in supporting the late Rev. Jerry Falwell, having previously called him an “agent of intolerance.”
In contrast, conservative religious powerbrokers, like James Dobson, who had expressed scepticism about McCain, quickly took to Palin, a lifelong pro-lifer and card-carrying member of the National Rifle Assn. In the 24 hours hours after McCain announced his selection, his campaign raked in a record $7 million in Internet donations.
“She’s a devastatingly good choice,” said Jacques Berlinerblau, the author of “Thumpin’ It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today’s Presidential Politics” and director of the Program for Jewish Civilization at Georgetown University. “From a religious perspective, Biden gave [Obama] nothing.”
Berlinerblau, who has not endorsed a presidential candidate, pointed out that the evangelical voting bloc does more for McCain than just energize voters in an abstract sense. These active churchgoers have a framework in place to bring out the vote, particularly in large churches. Churches like Palin’s, which enjoy non-profit tax status, are not allowed to endorse candidates, though pastors can freely discuss hot-topics like abortion.
“Infrastructure is almost synonymous with ‘church,’” Berlinerblau said. “Everybody knows what’s going on, [the pastor] just has to roll out the issues and everybody knows what he’s talking about.”
Though Berlinerblau predicts a backlash against such use of religious institutions in future elections, the pulpit could end up being a powerful political tool in 2008.
Obama does have an advantage against such mobilizing, compared to Democratic contenders of the past. The Illinois senator carries extra religious clout. During the Democratic and Republican primary seasons, a Time magazine poll found that among likely voters, 24 percent considered Obama “a person of strong religious faith” out of a list of prominent politicians, while about 15 percent of respondents said the same about McCain.
At the time of the poll, in May 2007, Time magazine pointed to a history of black Democratic politicians being associated with mobilizing their communities through Christian churches. Obama was perceived in this same context.
Considering that Sen. John Kerry appealed to the progressive wing of evangelicals and managed to siphon off about 20 to 22 percent of the evangelical vote in 2004, some experts say Obama has a good shot of holding some ground with the voting bloc.
Martin E. Marty, a prominent religion and culture scholar, said it’s important to remember that evangelicals are not a homogenous group.
“In the last eight years – the Bush years – there has been a great growth in the internal diversity of the group called evangelicals,” Marty said. “I don’t think many of them would depart from the criticism of abortion, but I don’t think they all give it the same priority.”
Marty noted that many evangelicals ascribe to a the social justice ethic outlined by Cardinal Joseph Berardin in 1983, the “consistent ethic of life” or seamless web. This philosophy opposes abortion but also euthanasia, war and the death penalty.
Factoring in these progressive evangelicals, Berlinerblau estimates Obama could be carrying as much as 24 to 25 percent of the voting bloc.
Now in a neck-and-neck race with McCain, Obama needs to hold onto them, particularly in swing states like Ohio.
“If Kerry had won 6 percent more evangelicals in Ohio [in 2004],” Berlinerblau said he calculated in researching his book, “he would have won the election.”
Midwestern evangelicals are perhaps a better target for the Obama campaign than elsewhere in the country, like the Deep South. Marty pointed out that in places like the upper-Midwest, residents are exposed to more of a mix of religious viewpoints that tend to foster less extreme views, making them more likely to support a more liberal candidate.
Just weeks ago, Obama’s Midwestern strategy was aimed largely at another voting bloc — independents. This group was expected to define the 2008 election, particularly with a maverick match-up between Obama and McCain. But. McCain’s choice of Palin has so shaken up the scene that evangelicals may once again emerge as the deciding vote.
In 2004, many observers had expected a less-energized evangelical vote. President George W. Bush, however, won more than 10 percent more of the evangelical vote in 2004 than he did in 2000, according the non-partisan Pew Research Center.
The question now is how much of the vote Obama will siphon off from McCain. It’s difficult to know exactly how the internal divisions of evangelicals break.
At services on Sunday, Kroon noted the difficulty of trying to understand who someone is — whether its Jesus or your hometown mayor.
“Look at us struggle,” Kroon said.
24 Comments
Comment posted September 9, 2008 @ 9:16 am
Don't assume that all Evangelicals vote Republican.
Young, more politically engaged Evangelicals are working hard to get Obama elected. And not so young (I'm 42 and, yes, I am an Evangelical).
Tony Campolo, an Evangelical pastor who is highly respected, contributed to the construction of Obama's platform. Jim Wallis, an Evangelical pastor who wrote God's Politics and is the head of Sojourner's, is pro-Obama.
In fact, the Christian Left is alive and well and we haven't been this excited by a candidate for some time.
The press isn't picking up on it yet (except for a recent small article in Time Magazine). But out here in the trenches? We are fired up for sure :)
But is the Christian Right on board with Palin? Yep. They always vote Republican anyway. No news there.
Comment posted September 9, 2008 @ 6:53 pm
While no party is the party of Christianity Mr Obama is the first Dem Pres Candidate to court the Christian vote seriously in a while.
Wikipedia defines the Evangelical left as such: (Remember Wikipedia is written and added to by contribution of all people.)
Main articles: Evangelical left and Progressive Christianity
Typically, members of the evangelical left affirm the primary tenets of evangelical theology, such as the doctrines of Incarnation, atonement, and resurrection, and also see the Bible as a primary authority for the Church. Unlike most evangelicals, however, the evangelical left is generally opposed to capital punishment and supportive of gun control. In many cases, evangelical leftists are pacifistic. Some promote the legalization of gay marriage or laws protecting abortion on demand.
Evangelicals of both the right and left often utilize modern Biblical criticism (commonly of the lower variety).
Much of this attempt is for the democratic party to regain heavy losses of support in the south (the Bible Belt” due to disagreements with abortion, pacifism and other on the lefts ok list. There is also a growing concern within the party due to the teachings of the Catholic Church being ever increasingly vocal concerning abortion. That's why you now see most democrats now say that they themselves are against abortion but believe it's still a choice that's not theirs to make. (This does not help with me as I believe there is no choice to make with a child's life whether in a mother's arms or inside her body)
To me Christian beliefs would no longer be Christian beliefs if they were watered down as such.
For those reasons is why it's not working real well in the south either.
Most of what is still taking place is that the “Blue States” are becoming bluer and the red states are becoming redder.
Comment posted September 9, 2008 @ 7:06 pm
Please also note that Tony Compolo is self described as a “Red Letter Christian” who believe that while they are strongly prolife, that it would not keep them for voting for a candidate who was not.
A Red Letter Christian would also have been strongly opposed to slavery, but would still vote for someone who thought it was ok to possess slaves.
Visit his site if you wish, as he is an interesting person, if sitting on the fence is your thing.
Comment posted September 11, 2008 @ 9:27 pm
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/9/143710/2…
Questions to ask Palin:
1. Do you believe that it was the intent of the Founders to establish a government that favors Christianity and Christians?
2. In a christian nation like the United States, if there is a legal dispute between a christian and a nonchristian, where the christian's position is grounded in christian principle, should a federal judge always favor the christian?
3. Is it possible that at some time in the future it may be necessary for christians in the United States to take up arms against nonchristians, in defense of christian principles?
4. Is it permissible for a christian to lie to a nonchristian, if the lie serves to help christian principles to prevail?
5. Is there any level of force that should NOT be used by a Christian leader in pursuit of christian goals?
Comment posted September 12, 2008 @ 2:27 am
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/9/143710/2…
Questions to ask Palin:
1. Do you believe that it was the intent of the Founders to establish a government that favors Christianity and Christians?
2. In a christian nation like the United States, if there is a legal dispute between a christian and a nonchristian, where the christian's position is grounded in christian principle, should a federal judge always favor the christian?
3. Is it possible that at some time in the future it may be necessary for christians in the United States to take up arms against nonchristians, in defense of christian principles?
4. Is it permissible for a christian to lie to a nonchristian, if the lie serves to help christian principles to prevail?
5. Is there any level of force that should NOT be used by a Christian leader in pursuit of christian goals?
Trackback posted August 23, 2011 @ 6:38 am
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Trackback posted August 24, 2011 @ 7:09 pm
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 8:50 pm
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 10:22 pm
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Trackback posted August 27, 2011 @ 1:31 pm
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Trackback posted August 28, 2011 @ 11:28 pm
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 12:22 am
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 2:24 am
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 4:25 am
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 5:48 am
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 6:28 am
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 8:17 pm
Sources…
[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 12:59 pm
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted September 1, 2011 @ 4:41 pm
Awesome website…
Thanks for the great information. If you are interested in Ensure Plus, check out my website…
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 4:31 am
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
Trackback posted September 3, 2011 @ 5:30 am
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Trackback posted September 7, 2011 @ 3:29 am
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted September 7, 2011 @ 9:01 am
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted September 7, 2011 @ 12:29 pm
Sources…
[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
