Feingold: Let’s Dump the Phrase ‘Judicial Activism’
Monday, July 13, 2009 at 11:17 am
Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) just wisely suggested that the phrase “judicial activism” be dropped from the lexicon of judicial nomination hearings, where it’s so frequently batted around to attack one side or another.
“I suggest we be wary of the phrase ‘judicial activism,’” he said. “So many of the rulings of the current conservative majority on the Supreme Court can be described as activist.” Meanwhile, some of our greatest Supreme Court decisions, including those that ended racial discrimination in education and guaranteed the right to vote, were surely considered “activist” at the time, yet are now considered some of our most important cases in the history of the court.
Today, it seems, “the best definition of a judicial activist is when a judge decides a case in a way you don’t like.”
Perhaps, noted Feingold, it’s time to retire that attack phrase and concentrate on a candidate’s judicial philosophy and record.
–
3 Comments
Pingback posted July 13, 2009 @ 3:03 pm
[...] Russ Feingold is my hero. “I suggest we be wary of the phrase ‘judicial activism,’” he said. “So many of the [...]
Comment posted July 13, 2009 @ 4:39 pm
Give up a cherished tool that helps limit bench membership to only Federalist Society types? About as soon as they drop the “liberal media” myth…
Comment posted July 13, 2009 @ 5:14 pm
Hurrah for the Democrats going after Republican activism on the court. Amidst all the talk of Republican attacks and attempts to debunk, the Democrats found a way to attack.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss