Maliki Comments a Blow to McCain

By
Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 8:02 am
Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki (AP Photo)

Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki (AP Photo)

For five years, the reasoning behind the U.S. occupation of Iraq has been that the Iraqi government believes that a U.S. military presence is needed to bring stability to the war-ravaged nation. Popular sentiment in Iraq may run heavily against the American presence — as it does in the U.S. — but as long as the Iraqi leadership, brought to power through elections regularly praised by the Bush administration, did not call for a U.S. withdrawal, the administration had a pretext for staying. For five years, that has been a safe bet: after all, three successive Iraqi prime ministers have been the beneficiary of U.S. protection.

On Saturday, everything changed.

Illustration by: Matt Mahurin

Illustration by: Matt Mahurin

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki told Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine, “U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.” Within hours, U.S. Central Command — at the behest of a clearly worried White Housereleased a statement arguing that Maliki was misquoted through a botched translation. But Monday, Maliki’s spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, said that the government was talking about “a timetable which Iraqis set.” Asked when that timetable would run out, Dabbagh quickly specified, “2010.”

As a result, the positions on Iraq of the Bush administration, the U.S. military and Sen. John McCain, the presumed GOP presidential nominee, now face numerous challenges. The administration’s plans for a permanent U.S. presence in Iraq have been profoundly undermined. The military will have to adjust to a strategy of extrication. The McCain campaign is presented with one of its nightmare scenarios: the Iraqi premier embracing the judgment of its opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, which strengthens Obama’s bona fides on a national-security issue McCain has largely staked his presidential bid on owning.

“McCain keeps stressing the need to craft strategy with input from those with on-the-ground information,” said Charles Kupchan, an international-relations professor at Georgetown University. “The prime minister of Iraq certainly qualifies.”

“I’ve said all along that Cheney and Bush made a fundamental decision almost two years ago, when they hadn’t a clue what to do on Iraq, to pass it on to the next administration,” added Larry Wilkerson, chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin L. Powell during Bush’s first term, said in a Monday phone call, “and hide behind the skirts of David Petraeus. That has not changed.” It might be the only thing.

For the Bush administration, Maliki’s embrace of what is essentially the Democratic position on Iraq collapses four years of intense effort to portray timetables for withdrawal as irresponsible, unforced defeats with dire humanitarian consequences. In an August 2007 speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, President George W. Bush, for the first time, explicitly compared Iraq to Vietnam. “One unmistakable legacy of Vietnam is that the price of America’s withdrawal was paid by millions of innocent citizens whose agonies would add to our vocabulary new terms like ‘boat people,’ ‘re-education camps,’ and ‘killing fields,’” Bush said. “If we were to abandon the Iraqi people, the terrorists would be emboldened, and use their victory to gain new recruits. As we saw on September the 11th, a terrorist safe haven on the other side of the world can bring death and destruction to the streets of our own cities.”

Yet Maliki, whose population would bear the brunt of the apocalypse Bush envisioned — as he would, personally, for collaborating with the Americans — has rejected that argument. Since November, Bush attempted to strong-arm the Iraqi premier into signing an agreement codifying an open-ended U.S. occupation. But on Friday, he conceded defeat in the face of massive Iraqi political opposition, even to the point of grudgingly embracing a “time-horizon” for U.S. withdrawal that Maliki demanded.

Maliki’s political situation all but demanded that position, according to long-time Iraq watchers. “As a security focus has given way to a political focus, the extent to which you think about what the insurgency might do [in the wake of withdrawal] declines relative to how [occupation] weighs on other Iraqi political actors,” said Marc Lynch, a professor of political science at the George Washington University. Maliki evidently believes that the vociferous nature of the opposition to an enduring U.S. occupation, combined with the upcoming provincial elections, makes embracing a timetable for withdrawal the safe political bet, Lynch explained. “The provincial elections loom fairly large,” he said. “It’s pretty obvious that opposing a long-term agreement pays off pretty well politically, and supporting it doesn’t.”

Wilkerson agreed. “Maliki is assessing his own continuing in power,” he said. “With the [provincial] election coming up, he can’t be seen as pandering to America at all. It’s a combination of politics and strategic reality.”

Maliki’s decision also suggests a shift is in the works for the U.S. military. Under the leadership of the departing U.S. commander Gen. David Petraeus and the coming U.S. commander Gen. Raymond Odierno, the military’s position in Iraq has been that troop reductions should come at their prerogative. “It depends on the conditions, depends on the mission set,” Petraeus told NBC’s Andrea Mitchell on Friday.

But now it also depends on the wishes of the Iraqi government, say military experts. “Odierno is going to have to oversee two things,” said Colin Kahl, a counterinsurgency expert at the Center for A New American Security and a member of the Obama campaign’s Iraq policy group. “One is a set of contingency plans for different paces of American redeployment. He’ll also be overseeing what the U.S. military calls ‘transition to overwatch’: to pull back taking the lead in combat and population-security missions to the Iraqi security forces.” He continued, “Keep in mind that the commander [in Iraq] is very much an interlocutor with Iraqi politicians. He’s gonna have to manage what will increasingly be a post-American world in Iraq. He’ll have to get concessions from Iraqis on hard political bargains in a context where American influence is declining. It’ll be a challenging year for Odierno in Iraq regardless of who his next commander-in-chief is.”

Jon Soltz, an Iraq veteran and co-founder of the veterans-advocacy group VoteVets, wasn’t sure that Maliki’s statement will make so much difference to Odierno. “Odierno is going to keep doing what he inherited, which is a better tactical strategy with less forces,” Soltz said in a series of instant-messages. “He won’t enjoy the forces [Petraeus] had. He doesn’t make policy, he executes it, despite what the Bush administration wants to admit. He will re-deploy when he gets the order from [Petraeus] who gets it from the [secretary of defense], who gets it from the [president].”

The more important consideration, Soltz said, is who wins the presidential election. And there, Maliki’s statement poses an enormous problem for John McCain. Within hours of the Der Spiegel interview being reported in the U.S. media, an anonymous GOP consultant and occasional McCain adviser, surely speaking for many on the right, told The Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder, “We’re fucked.”

And for good reason. McCain has all but predicated his campaign on the idea that Obama doesn’t understand national security. “Sen. Obama’s judgment on Iraq has been universally wrong,” McCain’s top foreign-policy adviser, Randy Scheunemann, said on a morning conference call. (Scheunemann dodged a question from the Politico’s Ben Smith about whether that included the decision to invade, which Obama opposed and McCain supported.) That position is difficult to sustain when the U.S.’s principal political ally in Iraq embraces Obama’s position at the expense of McCain’s desire for a 100-year-or-longer occupation.

Yet McCain has decided to remain with a position that entails remaining in Iraq despite the expressed wishes of the Iraqi government. His campaign blogger, Michael Goldfarb, wrote on Monday that the Obama-Maliki withdrawal plan was “an unconditional timeline we reject not only as being dangerous but unfeasible.” In an interview Monday morning with Meredith Viera, McCain himself suggested that he knew what Maliki wanted better than Maliki himself did: “I have been there too many times. I’ve met too many times with him, and I know what they want.”

“It’s an opening that, hopefully, the Obama campaign will exploit to justify their stance,” said Stoltz, of VoteVets.

Kahl, who has a peripheral role advising Obama, agreed. “Most Americans are not looking for an enduring, permanent presence in Iraq,” he said. “McCain’s 100 years comment — what he meant was a Korea-style presence — [and] 20,000 or 30,000 troops have been in Korea for…50 years — so I don’t think most Americans want that. I think they want some sense of responsible withdrawal sooner rather than later. The remarks out of Iraq probably means that [Iraqis] are increasingly comfortable with Obama’s policy.”

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Categories & Tags: National Security|

Comments

35 Comments

groucho
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 11:35 am

The recent turn in the debate over the “success” of the surge now reveals the clear way in which both sides are talking past each other. The surge was promoted by President Bush as a response to the call last year for prompt withdrawal. The claim was that, if we just sent in more troops and pacified the country, we could then withdraw. But now Bush/McCain admit that the real goal of the surge was to pacify the country enough so that Americans would stop complaining about our casualities and support permanent occupation. Of course, the opponents of the invasion have claimed all along that permanent occupation was the real goal. So at least we have the (modest) satisfaction of this admission. But it does seem unfair for McCain and his allies to claim that the surge worked when they did not tell us that the only goal was to keep us there rather than to get us out. Obama should continue to insist that the surge was a failure if it does not permit our withdrawal–the original goal.


spencer_ackerman
Comment posted July 22, 2008 @ 3:46 pm

I know!!!! It’s almost like Goldfarb is, like, stupid or dishonest or something.


ajm8127
Comment posted July 22, 2008 @ 9:13 am

“Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki told Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine, ‘U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.’”

Obama has stated that he could “refine” the withdrawal based on conditions in Iraq.

So, how can McCain’s weblogger Michael Goldfarb, write about the Obama-Maliki withdrawal plan as being “an unconditional timeline we reject not only as being dangerous but unfeasible.” That is clearly not the case.


ajm8127
Comment posted July 22, 2008 @ 4:13 am

“Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki told Germany's Der Spiegel magazine, 'U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.'”

Obama has stated that he could “refine” the withdrawal based on conditions in Iraq.

So, how can McCain's weblogger Michael Goldfarb, write about the Obama-Maliki withdrawal plan as being “an unconditional timeline we reject not only as being dangerous but unfeasible.” That is clearly not the case.


spencer_ackerman
Comment posted July 22, 2008 @ 10:46 am

I know!!!! It's almost like Goldfarb is, like, stupid or dishonest or something.


groucho
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 6:35 am

The recent turn in the debate over the “success” of the surge now reveals the clear way in which both sides are talking past each other. The surge was promoted by President Bush as a response to the call last year for prompt withdrawal. The claim was that, if we just sent in more troops and pacified the country, we could then withdraw. But now Bush/McCain admit that the real goal of the surge was to pacify the country enough so that Americans would stop complaining about our casualities and support permanent occupation. Of course, the opponents of the invasion have claimed all along that permanent occupation was the real goal. So at least we have the (modest) satisfaction of this admission. But it does seem unfair for McCain and his allies to claim that the surge worked when they did not tell us that the only goal was to keep us there rather than to get us out. Obama should continue to insist that the surge was a failure if it does not permit our withdrawal–the original goal.


cheap mbt shoes
Comment posted May 8, 2010 @ 7:19 am

Thanks for you share the article.Good!


nike shox
Comment posted May 25, 2010 @ 6:11 am

Good.post.I like it.


adidas outlet
Comment posted June 2, 2010 @ 5:11 am

Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.


mbt sandals
Comment posted June 2, 2010 @ 3:43 pm

Thank you for your sharing.I'm very interested in it.


mbt sandals
Comment posted June 3, 2010 @ 1:34 am

so cool


oak bar stool
Comment posted June 8, 2010 @ 8:30 am

Good.post.I like it.


jordan shoes
Comment posted June 8, 2010 @ 9:01 am

This is a real taste of the times


cheap nike shoes
Comment posted June 8, 2010 @ 12:18 pm

cheap Jordan shoes, cheap Nike shoes at http://www.hmsportsmall.com


cheap nike shoes
Comment posted June 8, 2010 @ 12:19 pm

cheap Jordan shoes, cheap Nike shoes at http://www.hmsportsmall.com


nike air max
Comment posted July 8, 2010 @ 9:17 am

air max shoes ever. The Air Max is an extremely comfortable shoe that uses a large air cushioning unit that can be seen from the side. This technology combined with the design of the shoe which is meant to compliment the spinal cord makes the Air Max the ideal shoe for walking, running, last chance cafe playing basketball, or any other sport. air max 2010,nike air max 2009,nike air max shoes,buy air max shoes,Nike introduced its Air Cushioning Technology in 1979. By embedding Air Cushioning in the midsoles of its running shoes, it changed the way athletes approached and reacted to athletic performance forever.


jordan shoes
Comment posted July 8, 2010 @ 9:17 am

The air Jordan brand is a household name and people of all ages and social strata line up eagerly for the release of the latest model. Some of this success can be attributed to the fact that the shoes, from the Jordan III to the most recent model, have always started with their namesake, Michael Jordan. The designers take his ideas, hobbies, and life into account and incorporate these feelings into the air jordan shoes .The “jumpman” is the logo of jordan shoes.


timberland sale
Comment posted July 8, 2010 @ 9:17 am

now,Timberlandlive is online store that professional supply best and newest Men's,Women's and Kid's Timberland Boots and Shoes.We have over 10 years online shopping expeciences,our Timberland products are no wonder your best choice,we promised to offer you genuince Timberland Boots,Cheap Timberland Boots.We are firmly hold the “Customer is God” and “Your Satisfactions,Our Pursuit”princicals,we have a good Customer service teams and best after-service.We hope our professional can satisfy your requirments.Now the Timberland Boots On Sale now,We have Timberland 6 Inch Boots,Timberland Custom Boots,Timberland Chukka Boots and others 2010 newest Timberland for you!It's a good chance to order now.Hope you have a good experience on shopping form us.


Navy
Comment posted July 26, 2010 @ 8:21 am

Nice news,thanks you for this good sharing. welcome to http://www.nflcoltsshop.com/


Xiaopohai769
Comment posted August 13, 2010 @ 1:39 am

thank you for information


usb modem
Comment posted August 16, 2010 @ 3:16 am

Good! I like this post very much,Thanks for your interesting post.


Aaddad11
Comment posted August 18, 2010 @ 7:50 am

Thank you for your sharing.


Fendichen2009
Comment posted September 11, 2010 @ 2:02 am

i dont know if there suitalbe to write something good website i meet here, for i hope every body could have a good shopping experience online.

here i want to introduce this website,
mainly selling nfl jerseys,
ghd purple, christian louboutin,
and air max 95.

they offer 24 hours online service, and very very good customer service.
i buy the air max 90 shoes online on the website, nice design and good quality. that is why i strongly introduce you here.nike shox

it is not a advertisment, just share my shopping experience with everybody. hope you have a nice day, and could enjoy the good shopping.air max


nikeoutlet
Comment posted September 14, 2010 @ 1:10 am

Thank you for your sharing.


polo ralph lauren
Comment posted September 17, 2010 @ 6:48 am

Good! I like this post very much,Thanks for your interesting post.


mens nike air 97
Comment posted October 13, 2010 @ 6:57 am

Grey nike air max for men happens that they are not above supporting themselves by dishonest mens nike air 97 means. Which should be more disreputable. Cultivate poverty men air max shoes like a garden herb like sage. Do not trouble yourself much to get new things whether clothes or women air max shoes friends Turn the old return to them. Things do not change; we change. Sell your clothes and keep your thoughts. Today we have higher nike air max white buildings and wider highways but shorter temperaments and narrower points of nike red air max 2009 view. However mean your nike air max 2010 mens life is meet it and live it; Do not shun it and call it hard names. It is not so bad nike air max 2010 as you are. It looks poorest when you are richest. The nike max 2009 on sale faultfinder will find faults in paradise. Love your new nike air max 2009 life poor as it is. You may perhaps have some pleasant thrilling glorious air max 95 black hours even in a poorhouse. The setting sun is reflected from the blue airmax 95 windows of the alms-house as brightly as from the rich man's blue air max 90 for women abode; the snow melts before its door as early in the spring. I do not see but a quiet mind may nike air max 90 live as contentedly there and have as cheering cheap air max 180 thoughts as in a palace. The town's poor seem to me often to live the most independent air max classic womens shoes lives of any. May be they are simply great nike air max enough to receive without misgiving. http://www.sellnikeairmax.com/ XYZ


louis
Comment posted October 14, 2010 @ 4:11 am

hey,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the same theme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.


Louis Vttion handbags
Comment posted December 9, 2010 @ 1:21 pm

The Epi Leather, shiny palladium hardware, rolled leather handles with ring attachments, and Louis Vuitton Canvas engraved padlock on the side of the bag make this handbag truly standout. Instantly, I fell in love with the balenciaga bags Speedy in black! It was gorgeous, sophisticated and I thought it would lovely in my collection. I absolutely loved the Speedy Cube, but due to the ultra high price I turned to the Epi collection for a more affordable take on a black louis vuitton belts handbag. At the moment, I have four different louis vuitton clutches in my collection going on a 5th in two weeks and I thought it was quite senseless to even think to getting lousi vuitton Speedy 30. So I change to search for a black Jimmy Choo clutches I came across the Louis Vuitton Leather Lockit and it was love at first sight! I have been eager to own a Louis Vuitton store Outlet in black for some time now. If the Catier bags doesnt interest you in black, it also is available in Cassis, Ivoire, and Red. My personal favorite is the black, and I just may add the Louis Vuitton discounts Epi Leather Lockit to my current wish collection. By the way, if you think the price is high, you can visit our online store to choose some Louis Vuitton multicolor for you. I change to search for MiuMiu tote I came across the Louis Vuitton Speedy handbag. Epi Leather Lockit and it was love at first sight! The Louis Vuitton Epi MiuMiu online have always been a favorite to me, and when I saw that the lockit came in Epi Leather also I was took. For some odd reason,cheap lv handbags sale, I have never taken notice of this particular lockit handbag before and I must say it is stunning.The features of this handbag are absolutely beautiful. Written by Louis Vuitton Trunk On Sale.


Yangzhifang2006
Comment posted May 12, 2011 @ 7:01 am

We keep talking about spring trends in handbags, clearly there are many. We have brought you stories on coach outlet online and Coach Outlet, and today I will tell you about another trend; floral patterns. Typically we would cover this Coach bag on Coach wallets, but I actually wanted to feature this on PurseBlog.


bikinis sexy
Comment posted May 13, 2011 @ 12:10 pm

http://www.bikinissexy.net/
http://www.visvimserra.com/ 


bikinis sexy
Comment posted May 13, 2011 @ 12:10 pm

http://www.bikinissexy.net/
http://www.visvimserra.com/ 


brm watch replica
Comment posted May 23, 2011 @ 6:42 am

panerai watches luminor in the role of a world-class refusalminate approval magnificent at homelin the company of and abroad,Bulgari-SQ22SS/SE mass trend persons wish this Bell & Ross Watches Collection Instrument BR 01-92 ,this swiss watches sales demonstrable you distinctly unexceptional,qualification you are a attempt of cut with the aim of armani watch strap track boss after that this database is substantially enjoyable,this IWC Portofino watches upright,Bell & Ross Watches Collection Instrument BR 01-92 Black Dial azure mirror it no tranquil on the way to garments,hearten definite of IWC Watches IW504210 impression, breguet watches the worth is very mean,you container procure Gucci watches with promote savoir-faire. 


Ms Office 2007
Comment posted June 14, 2011 @ 2:50 am

Everything is a form


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.