Comments on: Gonzales’ Testimony on Surveillance Was ‘Confusing, Inaccurate, and … Misleading’ http://washingtonindependent.com/50431/gonzales-testimony-on-surveillance-was-confusing-inaccurate-and-misleading National News in Context Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Weekly Web Watch 07/06/09 – 07/12/09 « EXECUTIVE WATCH http://washingtonindependent.com/50431/gonzales-testimony-on-surveillance-was-confusing-inaccurate-and-misleading/comment-page-1#comment-43586 Weekly Web Watch 07/06/09 – 07/12/09 « EXECUTIVE WATCH Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:37:37 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=50431#comment-43586 [...] Independent.  He highlights the finding that Alberto Gonzales’s testimony before Congress was misleading, but not intentionally so.  He also reports that the IGs determined that the majority of leads generated by the program had [...] [...] Independent.  He highlights the finding that Alberto Gonzales’s testimony before Congress was misleading, but not intentionally so.  He also reports that the IGs determined that the majority of leads generated by the program had [...]

]]> By: johnhkennedy http://washingtonindependent.com/50431/gonzales-testimony-on-surveillance-was-confusing-inaccurate-and-misleading/comment-page-1#comment-43490 johnhkennedy Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:03:58 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=50431#comment-43490 "Gonzales’ Testimony on Surveillance Was ‘Confusing Inaccurate and Misleading’ so Prosecute for lying under oath-Do Something! #fb<br><br><br><br><br>A Conspiracy To Deceive Congress for eight years, about a secret CIA program is just like the Conspiracy To Ignore And Render Moot Our US-Federal Anti-Torture Laws.<br><br>It is time our Congressmen, Republican as well as Democrats showed us they support our Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.<br><br>The time is now!<br><br>SIGN THE PETITION<br>calling for a special prosecutor at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG<br><br><a href="http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG" rel="nofollow">http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG</a> “Gonzales’ Testimony on Surveillance Was ‘Confusing Inaccurate and Misleading’ so Prosecute for lying under oath-Do Something! #fb

A Conspiracy To Deceive Congress for eight years, about a secret CIA program is just like the Conspiracy To Ignore And Render Moot Our US-Federal Anti-Torture Laws.

It is time our Congressmen, Republican as well as Democrats showed us they support our Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.

The time is now!

SIGN THE PETITION
calling for a special prosecutor at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

]]> By: Still Writing This Chapter of Bush II | Design Website Easy http://washingtonindependent.com/50431/gonzales-testimony-on-surveillance-was-confusing-inaccurate-and-misleading/comment-page-1#comment-43330 Still Writing This Chapter of Bush II | Design Website Easy Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:29:52 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=50431#comment-43330 [...] Spencer Ackerman is plowing through the joint IGs’ report on domestic surveillance that was just released. Among the conclusions he’s finding in the report: most leads secured by the secret surveillance program were determined not to have any connection to terrorism and — surprise!–then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ July 2007 testimony to Congress about the surveillance program was “confusing, inaccurate, and … had the effect of misleading.” [...] [...] Spencer Ackerman is plowing through the joint IGs’ report on domestic surveillance that was just released. Among the conclusions he’s finding in the report: most leads secured by the secret surveillance program were determined not to have any connection to terrorism and — surprise!–then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ July 2007 testimony to Congress about the surveillance program was “confusing, inaccurate, and … had the effect of misleading.” [...]

]]> By: msfreeh http://washingtonindependent.com/50431/gonzales-testimony-on-surveillance-was-confusing-inaccurate-and-misleading/comment-page-1#comment-43173 msfreeh Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:47:38 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=50431#comment-43173 to view a partial list of crimes committed by FBI agents over 1500 pages long see<br><a href="http://www.forums.signonsandiego.com/showthread.php?t=59139" rel="nofollow">http://www.forums.signonsandiego.com/showthread...</a><br><br>to view a partial list of FBI agents arrested for pedophilia see<br><a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3574" rel="nofollow">http://www.dallasnews.com/forums/viewtopic.php?...</a> to view a partial list of crimes committed by FBI agents over 1500 pages long see
http://www.forums.signonsandiego.com/showthread…

to view a partial list of FBI agents arrested for pedophilia see
http://www.dallasnews.com/forums/viewtopic.php?…

]]> By: strangely_enough http://washingtonindependent.com/50431/gonzales-testimony-on-surveillance-was-confusing-inaccurate-and-misleading/comment-page-1#comment-43163 strangely_enough Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:11:32 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=50431#comment-43163 "The DOJ [Inspector General] concluded that Gonzales did not intend to mislead Congress..."<br>Given the rest of that particular sentence, how does one reach that conclusion? “The DOJ [Inspector General] concluded that Gonzales did not intend to mislead Congress…”
Given the rest of that particular sentence, how does one reach that conclusion?

]]>