Don’t Be Fooled by New Credit Card Laws; Citi Still Raising Rates
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 at 3:18 pm
If you’ve got a credit card, you can’t be blamed for thinking that the landmark legislation recently passed by Congress to curb abuses by card issuers would mean the end of things like arbitrary interest rate hikes. That was supposed to be the point, after all, of Congress’ belated efforts to put an end to predatory lending practices by credit card companies, following years of complaints from consumers.
But then the Financial Times comes along to report that Citigroup suddenly hiked rates for as many as 15 million holders of cards it co-brands with retailers such as Sears. And Citi did so just months before provisions in the new law that would ban such a move take effect.
Citi isn’t entirely alone. Other card issuers have been gradually raising rates as well, in response to increasing default rates. But the FT said Citi’s hikes have been the sharpest. The paper cited sources close to the situation for its information, not any formal announcement of rate hikes by Citi.
Citi’s rate increases emerged on the day the government proposed legislation to create a new regulator with sweeping powers on consumer protection and a week after the bank was attacked by some politicians for raising employees’ salaries.
Holders of co-branded cards who failed to pay their balance in full at the end of the month saw their rates rise by an average 24 per cent – or nearly 3 percentage points – between January and April, according to a Credit Suisse analysis of data from the consultancy Lightspeed Research.
Citigroup told the FT that despite the fishy timing of the move, raising rates for no particular reason on millions of customers had nothing to do with a new law that would soon prevent it from such an action:
“We have adjusted pricing and card terms for some customers as part of our regular account reviews. This is an ongoing process to ensure we offer terms, interest rates, credit lines and products based on individual needs and risk profiles. [...]
“These changes also reflect the dramatically higher cost of doing business in our industry as we work to preserve the broad availability of credit.”
Yes, it’s that “availability of credit” argument again. For the past decade, whenever anyone dared to mention putting curbs on high interest rates for credit cards or mortgages, the lending industry always warned that any restrictions would lead to less availability of credit.
Things didn’t exactly turn out that way.
If Citi’s strategy of jacking up rates prior to a new law taking effect catches on, consumers with Citi cards would do best to vote with their feet and find another issuer who isn’t playing that game. But it’s not only consumers who might act. Citi famously remains the recipient of government largesse, and this new development has the potential to rank right up there with purchasing a luxury corporate jet right after being bailed out by taxpayers, in terms of public relations damage potential.
Maybe next time Congress takes on legislation to rein in the credit card firms, it should make sure its restrictions go into effect by the time the ink dries on the President’s signature — and not a minute later.
–
6 Comments
Comment posted August 12, 2009 @ 8:04 pm
I just got off the phone with Gary (employee # 38357, he refused to tell me his last name) a supervisor at American Express. (You didn't mention them in your article.)
I had called him because I received a letter stating that my interest rate was going to be increased by 6% on purchases, even ones that were made previous to the letter (dated Aug. 6). That is more than a 50% increase in APR.
He said that the letter is dated 14 days ahead of the new law going into effect, “so it's not illegal.”
When I asked him if he was happy about the increase, he said, “I can't say that I'm happy, because this affects me, too. I have an American Express Card, too. I apologize for the inconvenience, but it's not you specifically. It's across the board. It's affecting all of us.”
I then asked him if he's proud that his employer is sliding this in under the door to screw over their customers. That they get bailed out, but we get shit on by way of thanks for giving them our tax money. He said, “I am so sorry about all of this, but it affects all of us. This was a business decision and this is what we're going to be faced with.”
He then said, “Are you recording this?” I told him no, I'm just taking notes. He then said, “If you are documenting this, then I must let you knoew that we cannot have a recorded or documented conversation.” I said, “I already told you I'm not recording it, but I can document whatever I want.”
He did not respond to that.
Comment posted September 18, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
Being a new blogger, I would like to tell you that you have given me much knowledge about it. Thanks for everything.
regards
sears parts
Comment posted August 31, 2010 @ 8:10 am
Good! I like this post very much,Thanks for your interesting post.
Comment posted August 31, 2010 @ 8:10 am
Good! I like this post very much,Thanks for your interesting post.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss