<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Michael Scheuer Actually Urging an Attack on America?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:32:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: max191</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-83878</link>
		<dc:creator>max191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-83878</guid>
		<description>My friend suggested me to visit your blog. Very well explained. I would like to say that it is very interesting to read your blog.&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;charcoal grill&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend suggested me to visit your blog. Very well explained. I would like to say that it is very interesting to read your blog.<br />regards<br /><a rel="dofollow" href="http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com" rel="nofollow">charcoal grill</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hoard - The Idiocracy Index &#8211; Meet the Guests &#8211; 101 Days of FNC Idiocracy - True/Slant</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-68105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hoard - The Idiocracy Index &#8211; Meet the Guests &#8211; 101 Days of FNC Idiocracy - True/Slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-68105</guid>
		<description>[...] Washington Independent &#8211; Is Michael Scheuer Actually Urging an Attack on America? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Washington Independent &#8211; Is Michael Scheuer Actually Urging an Attack on America? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Garrett Roth</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-43421</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Garrett Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-43421</guid>
		<description>Because the comments directed toward Mr. Scheuer have generally been emotional knee-jerk reactions, I&#039;d like to propose the following hypothetical alternatives:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a) An isolated terrorist attack which kills 10,000 people but achieves the &quot;wake up call&quot; that Mr. Scheuer advocates&lt;br&gt;b) A series of coordinated terrorist attacks at a later date which kill 100,000 people&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whether these are the real alternatives that we, as Americans, confront is open to debate.  That Mr. Scheuer would advocate &quot;scenario a&quot; in this VERY hypothetical situation and subsequently be called a traitor is an illustration of how comments taken out of context can be overblown by the thin-skinned and naive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;M. Garrett Roth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the comments directed toward Mr. Scheuer have generally been emotional knee-jerk reactions, I&#39;d like to propose the following hypothetical alternatives:</p>
<p>a) An isolated terrorist attack which kills 10,000 people but achieves the &#8220;wake up call&#8221; that Mr. Scheuer advocates<br />b) A series of coordinated terrorist attacks at a later date which kill 100,000 people</p>
<p>Whether these are the real alternatives that we, as Americans, confront is open to debate.  That Mr. Scheuer would advocate &#8220;scenario a&#8221; in this VERY hypothetical situation and subsequently be called a traitor is an illustration of how comments taken out of context can be overblown by the thin-skinned and naive.</p>
<p>M. Garrett Roth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra_Troy</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-41804</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra_Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-41804</guid>
		<description>Yeah this argument doesn&#039;t make sense even if you leave out the crazy bit of hoping that more innocent civilians will be killed. Another terrorist attack would do nothing to make people more willing to accept the conservative security agenda in and of itself. Besides which, why would it have to be Osama Bin Laden? There are plenty of other terrorist groups that could launch such an attack. The guy just has Al-Qaeda on the brain and is forgetting about the many other threats out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah this argument doesn&#39;t make sense even if you leave out the crazy bit of hoping that more innocent civilians will be killed. Another terrorist attack would do nothing to make people more willing to accept the conservative security agenda in and of itself. Besides which, why would it have to be Osama Bin Laden? There are plenty of other terrorist groups that could launch such an attack. The guy just has Al-Qaeda on the brain and is forgetting about the many other threats out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longstreet</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-41589</link>
		<dc:creator>Longstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-41589</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the late response, I missed the incoming.  I think that the  most &lt;br&gt;dangerous thing Americans face is the leadership elite of both  parties.  &lt;br&gt;Think for a moment what has not been done in the last 35 years  and see if &lt;br&gt;you think either party has the best interests of Americans at  heart.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;--Continued dependence on foreign oil&lt;br&gt;--Bankrupting social security and Medicare&lt;br&gt;--No border controls/11 million-plus undocumented aliens&lt;br&gt;--Failure (since 1991) to make sure all Soviet nuclear devices are  under &lt;br&gt;control&lt;br&gt;--Failing to win a single war in which America has been involved&lt;br&gt;--Starting unnecessary wars (Iraq, Somalia, Serbia, etc.) without the  &lt;br&gt;constitution&#039;s required declaration of war&lt;br&gt;--Enormous numbers of billions of dollars in wasted foreign aid ($28  &lt;br&gt;billion in &#039;08) while Americans are unfed&lt;br&gt;--A depth of debt that is almost unimaginable, much of it held by our foes, &lt;br&gt; China and Saudi Arabia&lt;br&gt;--The continuing purchase of weapons systems irrelevant to America&#039;s  &lt;br&gt;defense needs&lt;br&gt;--Sending our soldiers and marines overseas with rules of engagement that  &lt;br&gt;makes them targets not killers&lt;br&gt;--A relationship with Israel that has involved us in the Israeli-Arab  &lt;br&gt;religious war in which we have no stake&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;While there are many dangers in and to America, there is no greater danger  &lt;br&gt;to our republic than our bipartisan governing class.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Mike Scheuer &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;In a message dated 7/3/2009 9:07:20 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  &lt;br&gt; writes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;nobody  (unregistered) wrote, in response to Longstreet:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;riiiiigt.. and the  first 9/11 happened... why?  We have only had two major &lt;br&gt;terrorist attacks  on US soil in my time.  One was on a Republicans &lt;br&gt;administrations &quot;watch&quot;  and the other was actually carried out by a Republican.  &lt;br&gt;Right wingers  are dangerous.  You should be far more concerned about them &lt;br&gt;than about  Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link to comment:  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america#comment-12069137&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-micha...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;You  may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off &lt;br&gt;notifications, go  to your Disqus settings at:  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**************Looking for love this summer? Find it now on AOL Personals. &lt;br&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove00000003&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove0000...&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the late response, I missed the incoming.  I think that the  most <br />dangerous thing Americans face is the leadership elite of both  parties.  <br />Think for a moment what has not been done in the last 35 years  and see if <br />you think either party has the best interests of Americans at  heart.</p>
<p>&#8211;Continued dependence on foreign oil<br />&#8211;Bankrupting social security and Medicare<br />&#8211;No border controls/11 million-plus undocumented aliens<br />&#8211;Failure (since 1991) to make sure all Soviet nuclear devices are  under <br />control<br />&#8211;Failing to win a single war in which America has been involved<br />&#8211;Starting unnecessary wars (Iraq, Somalia, Serbia, etc.) without the  <br />constitution&#39;s required declaration of war<br />&#8211;Enormous numbers of billions of dollars in wasted foreign aid ($28  <br />billion in &#39;08) while Americans are unfed<br />&#8211;A depth of debt that is almost unimaginable, much of it held by our foes, <br /> China and Saudi Arabia<br />&#8211;The continuing purchase of weapons systems irrelevant to America&#39;s  <br />defense needs<br />&#8211;Sending our soldiers and marines overseas with rules of engagement that  <br />makes them targets not killers<br />&#8211;A relationship with Israel that has involved us in the Israeli-Arab  <br />religious war in which we have no stake</p>
<p>While there are many dangers in and to America, there is no greater danger  <br />to our republic than our bipartisan governing class.</p>
<p>Mike Scheuer </p>
<p>In a message dated 7/3/2009 9:07:20 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  <br /> writes:</p>
<p>nobody  (unregistered) wrote, in response to Longstreet:</p>
<p>riiiiigt.. and the  first 9/11 happened&#8230; why?  We have only had two major <br />terrorist attacks  on US soil in my time.  One was on a Republicans <br />administrations &#8220;watch&#8221;  and the other was actually carried out by a Republican.  <br />Right wingers  are dangerous.  You should be far more concerned about them <br />than about  Obama.</p>
<p>Link to comment:  <br /><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america#comment-12069137" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-micha.." rel="nofollow">http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-micha..</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />You  may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off <br />notifications, go  to your Disqus settings at:  <br /><a href="http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/" rel="nofollow">http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/</a></p>
<p>**************Looking for love this summer? Find it now on AOL Personals. <br />(<a href="http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove00000003" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove0000.." rel="nofollow">http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove0000..</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darrelplant</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-40638</link>
		<dc:creator>darrelplant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-40638</guid>
		<description>&quot;I had hunch you would avoid the question.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you ask a question about foreign policy or national security? Did you ever answer any of my questions or did you just make up more loony assertions? And seriously, why should I answer the questions of some anonymous crazy posting under Michael Scheuer&#039;s name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I had hunch you would avoid the question.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you ask a question about foreign policy or national security? Did you ever answer any of my questions or did you just make up more loony assertions? And seriously, why should I answer the questions of some anonymous crazy posting under Michael Scheuer&#39;s name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-40615</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-40615</guid>
		<description>riiiiigt.. and the first 9/11 happened... why?  We have only had two major terrorist attacks on US soil in my time.  One was on a Republicans administrations &quot;watch&quot; and the other was actually carried out by a Republican.  Right wingers are dangerous.  You should be far more concerned about them than about Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>riiiiigt.. and the first 9/11 happened&#8230; why?  We have only had two major terrorist attacks on US soil in my time.  One was on a Republicans administrations &#8220;watch&#8221; and the other was actually carried out by a Republican.  Right wingers are dangerous.  You should be far more concerned about them than about Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BSR</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-40614</link>
		<dc:creator>BSR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-40614</guid>
		<description>Of course he is urging an attack on America.  Someone should be putting this traitorous bastard in jail.  It&#039;s fairly obvious these neocon scum simply do not believe in Democracy and are actively working to get as many Americans killed as they can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They should never be allowed to forget their shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course he is urging an attack on America.  Someone should be putting this traitorous bastard in jail.  It&#39;s fairly obvious these neocon scum simply do not believe in Democracy and are actively working to get as many Americans killed as they can.</p>
<p>They should never be allowed to forget their shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scheuer: Obama Doesn’t Care ‘About Protecting This Country’ &#124; Pure Politics</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-2#comment-40655</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scheuer: Obama Doesn’t Care ‘About Protecting This Country’ &#124; Pure Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-40655</guid>
		<description>[...] however, expressed disappointment in Scheuer&#8217;s comments and hoped that he was &#8220;being taken out of context,&#8221; citing his respect for Scheuer&#8217;s previous national security work. Unfortunately, it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] however, expressed disappointment in Scheuer&#8217;s comments and hoped that he was &#8220;being taken out of context,&#8221; citing his respect for Scheuer&#8217;s previous national security work. Unfortunately, it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longstreet</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america/comment-page-1#comment-40613</link>
		<dc:creator>Longstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49373#comment-40613</guid>
		<description>I had  hunch you would avoid the question.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Mike Scheuer&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;In a message dated 7/2/2009 9:32:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  &lt;br&gt; writes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;darrelplant wrote, in response to Longstreet:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;You of course  have to hit the target, or hit it approximately. Bush did &lt;br&gt;not have the moral  courage to do that...&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He managed to hit the civilian  population of two different countries -- &lt;br&gt;which you seem to endorse -- without  doing anything. I don&#039;t think it was his &lt;br&gt;lack of moral courage that was behind  that. More like sheer stupidity. &lt;br&gt;Probably listening to people like  you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;I wonder, in passing, whether your self-professed  &quot;liberal&quot; views and &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;obvious tender-hearted and genuine concern for  &quot;innocents&quot; ...&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What make you think I object to killing  people? What I don&#039;t think is a &lt;br&gt;good plan is killing people indiscriminately  for no particular reason. If the &lt;br&gt;US had gone into Afghanistan specifically to  capture or kill al Qaeda &lt;br&gt;operatives and leaders after 9/11 (or before) that  would have been one thing. &lt;br&gt;Occupying the whole country eight years after  letting the same people &lt;br&gt;escape? Invading and occupying a country that had  nothing to do with it for six &lt;br&gt;years (and counting)? That just seems like an  idiot&#039;s plan for the &lt;br&gt;destruction of the US military and the  economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sort of like hoping for an American city to be wiped  off the face of the &lt;br&gt;globe, like you do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link to comment:  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america#comment-12055214&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-micha...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--&lt;br&gt;You  may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off &lt;br&gt;notifications, go  to your Disqus settings at:  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the &lt;br&gt;grill. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood0...&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had  hunch you would avoid the question.</p>
<p>Mike Scheuer</p>
<p>In a message dated 7/2/2009 9:32:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  <br /> writes:</p>
<p>darrelplant wrote, in response to Longstreet:</p>
<p>&#8220;You of course  have to hit the target, or hit it approximately. Bush did <br />not have the moral  courage to do that&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>He managed to hit the civilian  population of two different countries &#8212; <br />which you seem to endorse &#8212; without  doing anything. I don&#39;t think it was his <br />lack of moral courage that was behind  that. More like sheer stupidity. <br />Probably listening to people like  you.</p>
<p>&#8220;I wonder, in passing, whether your self-professed  &#8220;liberal&#8221; views and </p>
<p>obvious tender-hearted and genuine concern for  &#8220;innocents&#8221; &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What make you think I object to killing  people? What I don&#39;t think is a <br />good plan is killing people indiscriminately  for no particular reason. If the <br />US had gone into Afghanistan specifically to  capture or kill al Qaeda <br />operatives and leaders after 9/11 (or before) that  would have been one thing. <br />Occupying the whole country eight years after  letting the same people <br />escape? Invading and occupying a country that had  nothing to do with it for six <br />years (and counting)? That just seems like an  idiot&#39;s plan for the <br />destruction of the US military and the  economy.</p>
<p>Sort of like hoping for an American city to be wiped  off the face of the <br />globe, like you do.</p>
<p>Link to comment:  <br /><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-michael-scheuer-actually-urging-an-attack-on-america#comment-12055214" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-micha.." rel="nofollow">http://washingtonindependent.com/49373/is-micha..</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />You  may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off <br />notifications, go  to your Disqus settings at:  <br /><a href="http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/" rel="nofollow">http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/</a></p>
<p>**************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the <br />grill. (<a href="http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood0.." rel="nofollow">http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood0..</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
